Hypertension: Levi Z

Rachmani R, Bar-Dayan Y, Ronen Z, Levi Z, Slavachevsky I, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir Hospital Kfar Sava and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University, Israel. · Diabetes Obes Metab. · Pubmed #14686965 No free full text.

Abstract: AIM: Acarbose, a glucose oxidase inhibitor, delays the absorption of glucose thus reducing post-prandial blood glucose level, haemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) and insulin resistance in patients with diabetes mellitus and in subjects with impaired glucose tolerance. The effect of acarbose in subjects with normal glucose tolerance (NGT) has hitherto not been examined. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of acarbose in obese hypertensive subjects with NGT. METHODS: A double-blinded, parallel group study was performed on 56 male subjects with hypertension, body mass index (BMI) 27-35 kg/m2, fasting blood glucose < or =6 mmol/l and a normal oral glucose tolerance test. Blood pressure, HbA1c, lipid profile and insulin resistance [homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index] were determined initially and following 24 weeks of acarbose, 150 mg/day or placebo. The primary end point was the change in insulin resistance. Anti-hypertensive treatment and diet were kept constant during the study. RESULTS: Insulin resistance decreased in acarbose users but not on placebo. HOMA index declined from 5.36 +/- 1.7 to 4.10 +/- 1.6 (p=0.001) on acarbose, the corresponding values on placebo were 5.44 +/- 1.9 and 5.53 +/- 1.7. A decrease in serum triglyceride values (2.16 +/- 0.16 mmol/l to 1.76 +/- 0.15 mmol/l, p=0.02) took place on acarbose with no change on placebo. There was no change in BMI, low-density lipoprotein or high-density lipoprotein values in either group. Blood pressure declined equally in both the groups, probably due to better patient compliance. CONCLUSIONS: Acarbose may reduce insulin resistance and triglycerides also in obese hypertensive subjects with normal glucose tolerance.

Rachmani R, Levi Z, Zadok BS, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir-Hospital, Kfar-Sava, Israel. · Clin Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #12235451 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Lipoprotein oxidation, dyslipidemia, and hypertension are important underlying causes of accelerated atherosclerosis in patients with diabetes mellitus. The potential of antihypertensive medications to reduce lipid oxidation is, therefore, an important determinant in the choice of agents for patients with diabetes mellitus. The aim of this study was to compare the lowering effect of a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist, lercanidipine, with that of the first angiotensin-receptor blocker, losartan, on low-density lipoprotein (LDL) oxidation. METHODS: Forty patients in metabolically stable condition who had type 2 diabetes mellitus with hypertension were studied in this single-blind, randomized, prospective crossover study, comprising 2 treatment periods of 16 weeks each, separated by a 4-week washout period. LDL oxidation was evaluated by dialdehyde analysis by means of the thiobarbituric acid-reactive substances assay with and without cupric sulfate, as well as determination of conjugated dienes in the LDL lipid extract. RESULTS: Lercanidipine and losartan both significantly reduced the propensity of the serum to oxidize LDL (P =.001). With one method of estimation (conjugated dienes), the effect of lercanidipine was superior to that of losartan (P =.04). Losartan lowered urinary albumin excretion but lercanidipine did not. CONCLUSIONS: Both lercanidipine and losartan attenuate LDL oxidation in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and hypertension. This observation may offer insight into the mechanisms of the therapeutic effects of these agents in patients with diabetes mellitus.

Rachmani R, Levi Z, Slavachevski I, Avin M, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel-Aviv University and Meir Hospital, Kfar-Sava, Israel. · Diabet Med. · Pubmed #12027926 No free full text.

Abstract: AIMS: Intensive management of risk parameters in diabetic patients may retard the progression of both micro- and macrovascular complications. Intensified care requires expert staff and is expensive. The aim of the present study was to examine whether sharing the therapeutic responsibility with the patients will improve the outcome. METHODS: A randomized prospective study of 165 patients with diabetes mellitus Type 2, hypertension (> 140/90 mmHg) and hyperlipidaemia (LDL-C > 120 mg/dl). Patients were randomly allocated to standard annual consultation (SC) or to a patient participation programme (PP). The medical care for both groups was administered by primary care physicians, who were unaware of the nature of the intervention. RESULTS: At 4 years the mean blood pressure was 148/88 (+/- 6.1/1.7) mmHg in the SC patients vs. 142/84 (+/- 5.8/1.8) mmHg in the PP group (P = 0.02). The mean LDL-C was 124 +/- 8 and 114 +/- 6 mg/dl (P = 0.01) and the mean HbA1c was 8.9 +/- 1.2% and 8.2 +/- 1.5% (P = 0.04) in the SC and PP groups, respectively. The average annual fall in estimated glomerular filtration rate was 3.5 ml/min per year in the SC group vs. 2.25 in the PP group (P < 0.05). Albumin/creatinine ratio > 300 mg/g developed in four SC patients vs. none of the PP patients. There was a total of 36 cardiovascular events in the SC group vs. 23 in the PP group (P = 0.04). All patients in the PP group received ACE inhibitors (or AII blockers) and statins vs. 52% and 43%, respectively, in the SC group. Glucose-lowering regimens were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Well-informed and motivated patients were more insistent to reach and maintain target values of the main risk factors of diabetic complications. The differences between the PP and SC groups were of the same order of magnitude as those between intensive and standard care groups in other studies albeit with, comparatively, a very modest cost.

Rachmani R, Slavachevsky I, Amit M, Levi Z, Kedar Y, Berla M, Ravid M. · Department of Medicine, Meir-Hospital Kfar-Sava and the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. · Diabet Med. · Pubmed #15089793 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The effect of spironolactone, cilazapril and their combination on albuminuria was examined in a randomized prospective study in female patients with diabetes and hypertension. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty female diabetic patients aged 45-70 years with blood pressure (BP) 140-180/90-110 mmHg, serum creatinine (sCr) < or = 160 micro mol/l, HbA(1c) < or = 10%, and albuminuria were treated by atenolol 12.5-75 mg/d and hydrochlorothiazide 6.25-25 mg/d. Titration-to-target helped to reach BP values < or = 135/85 mmHg in 46 patients after 12 weeks. These patients were randomized to spironolactone 100 mg/d or cilazapril 5 mg/d for 24 weeks. Then both groups received spironolactone 50 mg/d and cilazapril 2.5 mg/d for 24 weeks. BP was stabilized by tapering the dose of the initial agents. Urinary albumin/creatinine ratio (ACR), BP, K(+). sCr and HbA(1c) were assessed at baseline and at weeks 12, 16, 36 and 60. RESULTS: The average BP at week 12 was 128 +/- 4/81 +/- 3 mmHg and remained constant, in both groups, throughout the study. ACR declined on spironolactone from a median value (range) of 452 (124-1571) to 216 (64-875) mg/g (P = 0.001), and on cilazapril to 302 (90-975) mg/g (P = 0.001). The difference between spironolactone and cilazapril was significant (P = 0.002). Combined treatment resulted in a further modest decline in ACR. Serum creatinine was unaltered by spironolactone and rose slightly (121 to 126 micro mol/l, P = 0.02) on cilazapril. CONCLUSION: At the doses tested, spironolactone was superior to cilazapril in reducing albuminuria. Combined administration was more effective than either drug alone. These effects were independent of BP values. Hyperkalaemia was the main side-effect.