Hypertension: Dawes M

Padwal RS, Hemmelgarn BR, Khan NA, Grover S, McKay DW, Wilson T, Penner B, Burgess E, McAlister FA, Bolli P, Hill MD, Mahon J, Myers MG, Abbott C, Schiffrin EL, Honos G, Mann K, Tremblay G, Milot A, Cloutier L, Chockalingam A, Rabkin SW, Dawes M, Touyz RM, Bell C, Burns KD, Ruzicka M, Campbell NR, Vallée M, Prasad R, Lebel M, Tobe SW, Anonymous00149. · Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada. · Can J Cardiol. · Pubmed #19417858 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension. OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES: The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on appropriate blood pressure measurement, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, the degree of blood pressure elevation, the method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk and determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2007 to October 2008 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed full-text articles only. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of global risk assessment and the need for ongoing monitoring of hypertensive patients to identify incident type 2 diabetes. VALIDATION: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations were required to be supported by at least 70% of task force members. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.

Padwal RS, Hemmelgarn BR, McAlister FA, McKay DW, Grover S, Wilson T, Penner B, Burgess E, Bolli P, Hill M, Mahon J, Myers MG, Abbott C, Schiffrin EL, Honos G, Mann K, Tremblay G, Milot A, Cloutier L, Chockalingam A, Khan NA, Rabkin SW, Dawes M, Touyz RM, Tobe SW, Anonymous00038. · Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta. · Can J Cardiol. · Pubmed #17534459 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To provide updated, evidence-based recommendations for the diagnosis and assessment of adults with hypertension. OPTIONS AND OUTCOMES: The diagnosis of hypertension is dependent on the appropriate measurement of blood pressure, the timely assessment of serially elevated readings, the degree of blood pressure elevation, the method of measurement (office, ambulatory, home) and any associated comorbidities. The presence of cardiovascular risk factors and target organ damage should be ascertained to assess global cardiovascular risk, and to determine the urgency, intensity and type of treatment required. EVIDENCE: MEDLINE searches were conducted from November 2005 to October 2006 with the aid of a medical librarian. Reference lists were scanned, experts were contacted, and the personal files of authors and subgroup members were used to identify additional studies. Content and methodological experts assessed studies using prespecified, standardized evidence-based algorithms. Recommendations were based on evidence from peer-reviewed, full-text articles only. RECOMMENDATIONS: Recommendations for blood pressure measurement, criteria for hypertension diagnosis and follow-up, assessment of global cardiovascular risk, diagnostic testing, diagnosis of renovascular and endocrine causes of hypertension, home and ambulatory monitoring, and the use of echocardiography in hypertensive individuals are outlined. Key messages in 2007 include continued emphasis on the expedited, accurate diagnosis of hypertension, the importance of assessing the risk of cerebrovascular events as part of global risk assessment, the need for ongoing reassessment of patients with high normal blood pressure, and reviews of recent studies involving laboratory testing and home monitoring. VALIDATION: All recommendations were graded according to strength of the evidence and were voted on by the 57 members of the Canadian Hypertension Education Program Evidence-Based Recommendations Task Force. All recommendations reported here received at least 70% consensus. These guidelines will continue to be updated annually.

Thompson A, Campbell NR, Cloutier L, Costello JA, Dawes M, Hickey J, Kaczorowski J, Lewanczuk RZ, Semchuk W, Tsuyuki RT, Anonymous00022. · Regional Pharmacy Services, Alberta Health Services, 0G1.01 Walter J MacKenzie Centre, Edmonton, AB, Canada. · Can Fam Physician. · Pubmed #19074693 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Grad RM, Meng Y, Bartlett G, Dawes M, Pluye P, Boillat M, Rao G, Thomas R. · Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada. · Fam Med. · Pubmed #16273453 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: It is not yet known if personal digital assistant (PDA)-assisted evidence-based medicine (EBM) courses in postgraduate training enhance knowledge of common clinical problems. This study's objective was to determine if PDA-assisted EBM training would improve clinical knowledge. METHODS: In a controlled trial, intervention group residents received InfoRetriever on a PDA coupled with an EBM course integrated within clinical rotations in family medicine. The effect of the intervention and the rate of use of InfoRetriever on a written test of knowledge were evaluated after adjusting for baseline knowledge scores. The test measured knowledge of primary care management of hypertension and diabetes as well as estimation of disease probability. RESULTS: There was no effect on first posttest knowledge scores of the intervention overall or of the rate with which participants had used InfoRetriever during the intervention. However, when intervention group residents retook the test with access to InfoRetriever while taking the knowledge test, scores increased 7.4% (+2.4 correct test questions). Access to InfoRetriever Clinical Prediction Rules on a PDA, however, had an unclear effect on residents' ability to estimate disease probability. CONCLUSIONS: There was no effect of a PDA-assisted EBM course on knowledge test scores, although using the PDA during the test results in higher scores. It is unclear if using PDA Clinical Prediction Rules can improve residents' estimates of disease probability.

Ma G, Sabin N, Dawes M. · Department of Family Medicine, McGill University, Montréal, Que. · CMAJ. · Pubmed #18299548 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The measurement of blood pressure is a common clinical exam with important health consequences. We sought to determine whether the measurement of blood pressure over a sleeved arm varies from that taken on a bare arm. METHODS: We recruited 376 patients between 18 and 85 years of age from a family medicine clinic between September 2004 and November 2006. They all had their blood pressure recorded using the same automatic oscillometric device, with the cuff placed over their bare arms for the first reading. Each patient was then randomly assigned to either the bare-arm group, for which the second blood pressure reading was also taken on a bare arm, or the sleeved-arm group, for which the second reading was taken with the cuff placed over the patient's sleeve. RESULTS: The mean age of the 376 participants was 61.6 years (standard deviation 15.0), 61% of the participants were male, 41% had hypertension and 11.7% had diabetes. We found no clinically important differences between the bare-arm group (n = 180) and the sleeved-arm group (n = 196) in age, sex or body mass index. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the bare-arm group were 4.1 mm Hg (95% confidence interval [CI] 2.8 to 5.5) for systolic blood pressure and 0.1 mm Hg (95% CI -0.7 to 0.9) for diastolic blood pressure. The mean differences between the first and second readings for patients in the sleeved-arm group were 3.4 mm Hg (95% CI 2.1 to 4.7) for systolic blood pressure and 0.4 mm Hg (95% CI -0.4 to 1.3) for diastolic blood pressure. The between-group differences in these values was 0.76 mm Hg (95% CI -1.13 to 2.65) for systolic and -0.31 mm Hg (95% CI -1.48 to 0.86) for diastolic blood pressure; neither of these differences was clinically important or statistically significant. INTERPRETATION: We found that there was no significant difference in blood pressure recorded over a sleeve or on a bare arm. For practical purposes, the decision to measure blood pressure on a bare arm or over a sleeved arm should be left to the judgment of the health care professional taking the blood pressure.

Stewart AD, Millasseau SC, Dawes M, Kyd PA, Chambers JB, Ritter JM, Chowienczyk PJ. · Cardiovascular Division, King's College, London, UK. · Am J Hypertens. · Pubmed #16461185 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Activity of the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system is thought to play a major role in determining blood pressure (BP) and target organ damage such as left ventricular hypertrophy. In Afro-Caribbean subjects, however, hypertension tends to be more severe despite lower plasma renin activity. We investigated whether this might be due to a different relation between aldosterone and renin in Afro-Caribbean compared to white subjects. METHODS: Plasma aldosterone and renin activity were assessed in the morning after 15 min seated in 383 hypertensive subjects of Afro-Caribbean or white ethnicity (61% Afro-Caribbean, 83% on treatment) attending a hypertension clinic in London, UK. Left ventricular mass index (LVMI) was assessed by echocardiography in 276 subjects. RESULTS: Plasma renin activity was lower in Afro-Caribbean compared to white subjects (0.4 [0.3-1.0] v 1.4 [0.5-3.4] ng/mL/h, medians [interquartile range], P < .0001). Despite this, aldosterone was higher in Afro-Caribbean compared to white subjects (8.0 [6.1-12.6] v 7.4 [2.3-17.1] ng/dL, medians [interquartile range], P < .01). The LVMI corrected for sex and BP was higher in Afro-Caribbean than in white subjects. In Afro-Caribbean but not in white subjects LVMI was independently correlated with plasma aldosterone (standardized regression coefficient, beta= 0.25, P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: In Afro-Caribbean hypertensive subjects in London, plasma aldosterone is elevated despite lower renin and may contribute to increased severity of hypertension and left ventricular hypertrophy in Afro-Caribbean compared to white subjects.