Hyperlipidemias: van der Graaf A

van der Graaf A, Hutten BA, Kastelein JJ, Vissers MN. · Academic Medical Centre, Dept.Vascular Medicine, Meibergdreef 9 (room F4-159.2) 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. · Pubmed #16716095 No free full text.

Abstract: Heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia is associated with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and the development of premature cardiovascular disease. Despite this general statement, data regarding the incidence of cardiovascular disease in young women with familial hypercholesterolemia are lacking. In this review, information of age-specific incidence, risk factors and therapeutic avenues in women with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia are discussed.

van der Graaf A, Nierman MC, Firth JC, Wolmarans KH, Marais AD, de Groot E. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Acta Paediatr. · Pubmed #17062478 No free full text.

Abstract: AIM: To assess whether early initiation of statin therapy for heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia favourably affects lipid profiles or vascular morphological changes. METHODS: Children and adolescents aged 10-16 y with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia were administered fluvastatin (80 mg/d) for 2 y in a single-arm two-centre study. Carotid B-mode intima-media thickness (IMT) and M-mode arterial wall stiffness (beta) were recorded. Eighty of the 85 enrolled subjects completed the trial. RESULTS: The median decrease in low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol from baseline at last study visit was 33.9%; median decreases in total cholesterol, triglycerides and apolipoprotein B were 27.1%, 5.3% and 24.2%, respectively; the median increase in high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol was 5.3%. Changes in carotid arterial wall thickness and stiffness versus baseline were fractional and statistically non-significant (delta IMT -0.005 mm, 95% CI -0.018 to +0.007 mm, n=83; and delta beta = 0.017, 95% CI -0.219 to +0.253, n=79). Adverse events, all non-serious, were reported by 58 subjects (68.2%); four were suspected to be drug-related. Change in hormone levels and sexual maturation were appropriate for this age group. CONCLUSION: Fluvastatin lowered LDL cholesterol, total cholesterol and apolipoprotein B levels effectively over a prolonged period in children and adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia. Carotid IMT and wall stiffness remained largely unchanged.

van der Graaf A, Cuffie-Jackson C, Vissers MN, Trip MD, Gagné C, Shi G, Veltri E, Avis HJ, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #18940534 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). BACKGROUND: Aggressive intervention to achieve lipid goals for adolescents with HeFH is recommended to reduce risk of premature cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 248 male and female subjects ages >or=10 and <or=17 years with HeFH were randomized to receive: step 1: simvastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by step 2: simvastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 27 weeks; followed by step 3: all subjects received open-label simvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day (titrated to maximum 40 mg/day) plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 20 weeks. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin for 6 weeks (step 1) resulted in significantly greater mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (49.5%) compared with simvastatin monotherapy (34.4%; p < 0.01) in pooled dose groups and in individual dose groups (46.7% vs. 30.4%, 49.5% vs. 34.3%, 52.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; p < 0.01). At 33 weeks (step 2), ezetimibe-simvastatin subjects had a mean 54.0% reduction in LDL-C compared with a mean 38.1% reduction in simvastatin monotherapy subjects (p < 0.01). At 53 weeks (step 3), the pooled reduction in LDL-C was 49.1%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated throughout 53 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was safe, well tolerated, and provided higher LDL-C reduction compared with simvastatin alone in adolescents with HeFH studied up to 53 weeks. (Effects of Ezetimibe With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia; NCT00129402).

van der Graaf A, Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Hutten BA, Wiegman A, Trip MD, Stroes ES, Wijburg FA, Otvos JD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #18492534 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine lipoprotein particle concentrations and size in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and investigate the effect of pravastatin therapy on these measures. STUDY DESIGN: Lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes were examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in 144 children with FH and 45 unaffected siblings. The effect of pravastatin therapy (20 to 40 mg) on lipoprotein particle concentration and size were compared with placebo after 1 year of treatment, using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Compared with the unaffected siblings, the children with FH had significantly higher concentrations of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (115.6 nmol/L vs 51.2 nmol/L; P < .001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (1726.8 nmol/L vs 955.3 nmol/L; P < .001), and lower concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (23.2 micromol/L vs 26.9 micromol/L; P < .001). Compared with placebo, pravastatin therapy decreased the concentration of VLDL particles by 35.9 nmol/L (P < .001), of total LDL particles by 342.7 nmol/L (P < .001), of large LDL particles by 189.5 nmol/L (P < .001), and of small LDL particles by 156.2 nmol/L (P = .152), but increased the concentration of total HDL particles by 2.2 micromol/L (P < .001), of large HDL particles by 1.0 micromol/L (P = .006), and of medium HDL particles by 1.1 micromol/L (P = .003). VLDL particle size increased by 1.0 nm (P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their healthy siblings, children with FH have an atherogenic lipoprotein profile based on their lipoprotein distribution and lipoprotein particle diameter. Pravastatin therapy can improve, but not fully restore, these lipoprotein abnormalities toward normal levels in these children.

Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Wiegman A, van Trotsenburg AS, van der Graaf A, de Groot E, Wijburg FA, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. · Academic Medical Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Circulation. · Pubmed #17664376 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We previously demonstrated in a randomized placebo-controlled trial that 2-year pravastatin treatment induced a significant regression of carotid intima-media thickness (IMT) in 8- to 18-year-old children with familial hypercholesterolemia. Subsequently, we continued to follow up these children to explore the relation between the age of statin initiation and carotid IMT after follow-up on statin treatment. We also examined safety aspects of statin therapy during this long-term follow-up. METHODS AND RESULTS: All 214 children who initially participated in the previous placebo-controlled study were eligible for the follow-up study. After completion of the placebo-controlled study, all children continued treatment with pravastatin 20 or 40 mg, depending on their age. Blood samples were taken on a regular basis for lipids and safety parameters, and a carotid IMT measurement was performed after an average treatment period of 4.5 years. Follow-up data for 186 children were available for the statistical analyses. Multivariate analyses revealed that age at statin initiation was an independent predictor for carotid IMT after follow-up with adjustment for carotid IMT at initiation of statin treatment, sex, and duration of treatment. Early initiation of statin treatment was associated with a subsequently smaller IMT. Furthermore, no serious laboratory adverse events were reported during follow-up, and statin treatment had no untoward effects on sexual maturation. CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that early initiation of statin treatment delays the progression of carotid IMT in adolescents and young adults. The present study shows for the first time that early initiation of statin therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia might be beneficial in the prevention of atherosclerosis in adolescence.