Hyperlipidemias: Wood D

Rydén L, Standl E, Bartnik M, Van den Berghe G, Betteridge J, de Boer MJ, Cosentino F, Jönsson B, Laakso M, Malmberg K, Priori S, Ostergren J, Tuomilehto J, Thrainsdottir I, Vanhorebeek I, Stramba-Badiale M, Lindgren P, Qiao Q, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm J, Dean V, Deckers J, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo J, Zamorano JL, Deckers JW, Bertrand M, Charbonnel B, Erdmann E, Ferrannini E, Flyvbjerg A, Gohlke H, Juanatey JR, Graham I, Monteiro PF, Parhofer K, Pyörälä K, Raz I, Schernthaner G, Volpe M, Wood D, Anonymous00256, Anonymous00257. · Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. · Eur Heart J. · Pubmed #17220161 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Wood D. · Department of Cardiology, Charing Cross Hospital, London, UK. · Br Med Bull. · Pubmed #11756200 No free full text.

Abstract: The report of the World Health Organization Expert Committee on Prevention of Coronary Heart Disease considered that a comprehensive action for coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention has to include three components: A population strategy--for altering, in the entire population, those life-style and environmental factors, and their social and economic determinants, that are the underlying causes of the mass occurrence of coronary heart disease. A high risk strategy--identification of high risk individuals, and action to reduce their risk factor levels. Prevention of recurrent coronary heart disease events and progression of the disease in patients with clinically established coronary heart disease. Prevention targeted at patients with established coronary disease and the high risk strategy targeted at healthy individuals at high risk are an integral part of clinical practice. The clinical approaches and the population approaches for coronary heart disease prevention are complimentary, but the population strategy is fundamental to reducing the burden of cardiovascular disease.

Kotseva K, Wood D, De Backer G, De Bacquer D, Pyörälä K, Keil U, Anonymous00065. · Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, UK. · Lancet. · Pubmed #19286092 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The first and second EUROASPIRE surveys showed high rates of modifiable cardiovascular risk factors in patients with coronary heart disease. The third EUROASPIRE survey was done in 2006-07 in 22 countries to see whether preventive cardiology had improved and if the Joint European Societies' recommendations on cardiovascular disease prevention are being followed in clinical practice. METHODS: EUROASPIRE I, II, and III were designed as cross-sectional studies and included the same selected geographical areas and hospitals in the Czech Republic, Finland, France, Germany, Hungary, Italy, the Netherlands, and Slovenia. Consecutive patients (men and women </=70 years) were identified after coronary artery bypass graft or percutaneous coronary intervention, or a hospital admission with acute myocardial infarction or ischaemia, and were interviewed at least 6 months later. FINDINGS: 3180 patients were interviewed in the first survey, 2975 in the second, and 2392 in the third. Overall, the proportion of patients who smoke has remained nearly the same (20.3% in EUROASPIRE I, 21.2% in II, and 18.2% in III; comparison of all surveys p=0.64), but the proportion of women smokers aged less than 50 years has increased. The frequency of obesity (body-mass index >/=30 kg/m(2)) increased from 25.0% in EUROASPIRE I, to 32.6% in II, and 38.0% in III (p=0.0006). The proportion of patients with raised blood pressure (>/=140/90 mm Hg in patients without diabetes or >/=130/80 mm Hg in patients with diabetes) was similar (58.1% in EUROASPIRE I, 58.3% in II, and 60.9% in III; p=0.49), whereas the proportion with raised total cholesterol (>/=4.5 mmol/L) decreased, from 94.5% in EUROASPIRE I to 76.7% in II, and 46.2% in III (p<0.0001). The frequency of self-reported diabetes mellitus increased, from 17.4%, to 20.1%, and 28.0% (p=0.004). INTERPRETATION: These time trends show a compelling need for more effective lifestyle management of patients with coronary heart disease. Despite a substantial increase in antihypertensive and lipid-lowering drugs, blood pressure management remained unchanged, and almost half of all patients remain above the recommended lipid targets. To salvage the acutely ischaemic myocardium without addressing the underlying causes of the disease is futile; we need to invest in prevention.

Kotseva K, Stagmo M, De Bacquer D, De Backer G, Wood D, Anonymous00020. · Cardiovascular Medicine, National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, Charing Cross Hospital 5th Floor, Laboratory Block, Fulham Palace Road, London W6 8RF, United Kingdom. · Atherosclerosis. · Pubmed #17765905 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: During the last decade, the evidence of beneficial effects of cholesterol lowering in patients with coronary heart disease (CHD) has been proven in several clinical trials. This has prompted international guidelines on prevention of CHD to include recommendations on dietary and pharmacological treatment of hyperlipidaemia with set goals on total- and LDL-cholesterol. METHODS: The first EUROASPIRE survey performed in 1995/1996 showed poor adherence to the European recommendations on lipid-lowering in patients with CHD. The second survey was carried out in 1999/2000 in 15 European countries and enrolled 8181 patients with CHD. Medical records were assessed and clinical examinations of risk factors including serum lipids were performed. The aim of this survey is to describe the treatment of hyperlipidaemia among CHD patients in Europe. RESULTS: The proportion of patients not reaching the target of 5.0mmol/l was 58.3% with significant variations between countries. The use of lipid-lowering drugs was relatively high (60.9%). However, the most frequently used doses of lipid-lowering agents were much lower than the doses of proven effect used in clinical trials. CONCLUSIONS: Although the treatment of hyperlipidaemia in CHD patients seems to be improving as compared to the first survey, a significant number of patients do not reach treatment goals. If the full potential of lipid-lowering therapy was utilised with all eligible patients treated and doses titrated correctly, more patients would benefit in terms of reduced morbidity and mortality of CHD.