Hyperlipidemias: Trip MD

Avis HJ, Vissers MN, Stein EA, Wijburg FA, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Hutten BA. · Academic Medical Centre, Department of Vascular Medicine, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. · Pubmed #17569881 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Functional and morphological changes of the arterial wall already present in young children with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH) suggest that treatment should be initiated early in life to prevent premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy and particularly safety of statin therapy in children with HeFH. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a meta-analysis of randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trials evaluating statin therapy in children aged 8 to 18 years with HeFH. Six studies (n=798 children) with 12 to 104 weeks of treatment were included. Total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and apolipoprotein B were significantly reduced, whereas HDL cholesterol and apolipoprotein A1 were significantly increased by statin therapy. No statistically significant differences were found between statin- and placebo-treated children with respect to the occurrence of adverse events (RR 0.99; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.25), sexual development (RR of advancing > or = 1 stage in Tanner classification 0.96; 95% CI: 0.79 to 1.17), muscle toxicity (RR of CK > or = 10 times the upper limit of normal [ULN] 1.38; 95% CI: 0.18 to 10.82), or liver toxicity (RR of > or = 3 times the ULN for ASAT 0.98; 95% CI: 0.23 to 4.26 and for ALAT 2.03; 95% CI: 0.24 to 16.95). We found a minimal difference in growth in favor of the statin group (0.33 cm; 95% CI: 0.03 cm to 0.63 cm). CONCLUSION: In addition to the fact that statin treatment is efficacious, our results support the notion that statin treatment in children with HeFH is safe. Thus, even though further studies are required to assess lifelong safety, statin treatment should be considered for all children aged 8 to 18 with HeFH.

Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Trip MD, Wiegman A, Bakker HD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Semin Vasc Med. · Pubmed #15861313 No free full text.

Abstract: The recommended therapy of hypercholesterolemia in children consists of dietary modification and bile acid-binding resins. Unfortunately, the lipid-lowering efficacy of bile acid-binding resins is modest, and moreover, long-term compliance is poor because of side effects. In contrast, hydroxymethylglutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors (statins) are widely used in adults and are considered to be the first choice in the treatment of hypercholesterolemia in that age category. In the last few years, several randomized trials have been conducted to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of statin therapy in both children and adolescents. In this article, we review statin therapy in hypercholesterolemic children in terms of efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics, and psychosocial functioning. Statins are not only effective in reducing low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels in children with familial hypercholesterolemia but also improve endothelial function and reduce the progressive thickening of the intima media complex of the carotid arteries. Statins seem safe at the longer term in children in terms of plasma levels of liver enzymes and liver function, creatine kinase levels, and muscle function, as well as growth and sexual development. Long-term follow-up studies are needed to assess whether statin treatment started early in children with familial hypercholesterolemia can prevent future cardiovascular events.

Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Wiegman A, Trip MD, Bakker HD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Curr Opin Lipidol. · Pubmed #15243213 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF THIS REVIEW: This review provides an update on recent advances in the diagnosis and management of children with familial hypercholesterolemia. RECENT FINDINGS: A large cross-sectional cohort study of paediatric familial hypercholesterolemia demonstrated that affected children had a 5-fold more rapid increase of carotid arterial wall intima-media thickness during childhood years than their affected siblings. This faster progression led to a significant deviation in terms of intima-media thickness from the age of 12 years and onwards. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was a strong and independent predictor of carotid artery intima-media thickness in these children, which confirms the pivotal role of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol for the development of atherosclerosis. In this condition lipid lowering by statin therapy is accompanied by carotid intima-media thickness regression in familial-hypercholesterolemic children, which suggests that initiation of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol-reducing medication in childhood already can inhibit or possibly reduce the faster progression of atherosclerosis. Furthermore, these trials demonstrated that statins are safe and do not impair growth or sexual development in these children. Conversely, products containing plant sterols reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels by 14%, but did not improve endothelial dysfunction as assessed by flow-mediated dilatation. SUMMARY: Children with familial hypercholesterolemia clearly benefit from lipid-lowering strategies. Statins are safe agents and have been proven to reduce elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels significantly. In addition, statins improve surrogate markers for atherosclerosis. Therefore these agents should become the pivotal therapy in children with familial hypercholesterolemia.

Meuwese MC, de Groot E, Duivenvoorden R, Trip MD, Ose L, Maritz FJ, Basart DC, Kastelein JJ, Habib R, Davidson MH, Zwinderman AH, Schwocho LR, Stein EA, Anonymous00014. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, PO Box 22700, 1100 DE Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · JAMA. · Pubmed #19293413 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: Inhibition of acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase (ACAT), an intracellular enzyme involved in cholesterol accumulation, with pactimibe was developed to assist in the prevention of cardiovascular disease. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of pactimibe in inhibition of atherosclerosis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective, randomized, stratified, double-blind, placebo-controlled study (Carotid Atherosclerosis Progression Trial Investigating Vascular ACAT Inhibition Treatment Effects [CAPTIVATE]) of 892 patients heterozygous for familial hypercholesterolemia conducted at 40 lipid clinics in the United States, Canada, Europe, South Africa, and Israel between February 1, 2004, and December 31, 2005. Study was terminated on October 26, 2005. INTERVENTION: Participants received either 100 mg/d of pactimibe (n = 443) or matching placebo (n = 438), in addition to standard lipid-lowering therapy. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Carotid atherosclerosis, assessed by ultrasound carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), at baseline, 12, 18, and 24 months. Maximum CIMT was the primary end point and mean CIMT the secondary end point. RESULTS: Because pactimibe failed to show efficacy in the intravascular coronary ultrasound ACTIVATE study, the CAPTIVATE study was terminated prematurely after a follow-up of 15 months. After 6 months of treatment with pactimibe, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol increased by 7.3% (SD, 23%) compared with 1.4% (SD, 28%) in the placebo group (P = .001). The carotid ultrasonographic scans of the 716 patients with at least 2 scans and obtained at least 40 weeks apart were analyzed. Maximum CIMT measurements did not show a pactimibe treatment effect (difference, 0.004 mm; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.023 to 0.015 mm; P = .64); however, the less variable mean CIMT measurement revealed an increase of 0.014 mm (95% CI, -0.027 to 0.000 mm; P = .04) in patients administered pactimibe vs placebo. Major cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, and stroke) occurred more often in patients administered pactimibe vs placebo (10/443 [2.3%] vs 1/438 [0.2%]; P = .01). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, pactimibe had no effect on atherosclerosis as assessed by changes in maximum CIMT compared with placebo but was associated with an increase in mean CIMT as well as increased incidence of major cardiovascular events. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00151788.

Kuivenhoven JA, de Grooth GJ, Kawamura H, Klerkx AH, Wilhelm F, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #15842977 No free full text.

Abstract: The inhibition of cholesteryl ester transfer protein (CETP) has recently been shown to effectively increase high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol. This study examined the use of the CETP inhibitor JTT-705 combined with pravastatin. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, 155 patients with type II dyslipidemia using pravastatin 40 mg were treated with placebo or JTT-705 300 or 600 mg. Four weeks of treatment with JTT-705 600 mg led to a 30% decrease in CETP activity (p <0.001), a 28% increase in HDL cholesterol (p <0.001), and a 5% decrease in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (p <0.03). Combination therapy using JTT-705 and pravastatin effectively increases HDL cholesterol levels and is safe and well tolerated up to 4 weeks of administration.

van Wissen S, Smilde TJ, Trip MD, de Boo T, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands. · Heart. · Pubmed #12860867 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Raised plasma lipoprotein(a) (Lp(a)) is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular disease. It is unknown whether increased Lp(a) is an additional risk factor for coronary artery disease in familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) or whether statin treatment can reduce Lp(a) concentrations in the long term. OBJECTIVE: To investigate Lp(a) concentrations in relation to statin treatment and the progression of atherosclerosis in a large cohort of FH patients. DESIGN: A two year, randomised, double blind trial (the ASAP trial). PATIENTS: 325 heterozygous FH patients. INTERVENTION: Treatment with 80 mg atorvastatin or 40 mg simvastatin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Change in Lp(a) concentrations and intima-media thickness of carotid artery segments at one year and two years. RESULTS: At baseline, median Lp(a) concentrations were 327 mg/l and 531 mg/l in the atorvastatin and simvastatin arms, respectively (p = 0.03). In the atorvastatin arm, Lp(a) concentrations decreased to 243 mg/l after one year (p < 0.001) and to 263 mg/l after two years (p < 0.001). In the simvastatin arm, Lp(a) concentrations decreased to 437 mg/l after one year (p < 0.001) and to 417 mg/l after two years (p < 0.001). The difference in Lp(a) reduction between the two treatment arms was significant after one year (p = 0.004), but not after two years (p = 0.086). Lp(a) concentrations at baseline were not related to cardiovascular events at baseline. There was no correlation between baseline Lp(a) concentrations and low density lipoprotein cholesterol concentrations or intima-media thickness at baseline. Change in Lp(a) concentrations was not correlated with change in intima-media thickness after one or two years. CONCLUSIONS: Long term statin treatment significantly lowers Lp(a) in FH patients. However, this reduction was unrelated to changes in intima-media thickness and casts doubt on the importance of Lp(a) in the progression of atherosclerotic disease in these patients.

Trip MD, van Wissen S, Smilde TJ, Hutten BA, Stalenhoef AF, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Cardiology, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #12615272 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

van Wissen S, Trip MD, Smilde TJ, de Graaf J, Stalenhoef AF, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, P.O. Box 22.700, 1105 AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Atherosclerosis. · Pubmed #12417288 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: High sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) has emerged as the best studied and most promising marker of inflammation in atherosclerotic vascular disease. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The ASAP (effects of Atorvastatin vs. Simvastatin on Atherosclerosis Progression) study was a 2-year randomised, double-blind trial with 325 familial hypercholesterolemia patients, treated with torvastatin 80 mg or imvastatin 40 mg. Intima media thickness (IMT) of carotid artery segments and hs-CRP levels were determined at baseline, 1 and 2 years. RESULTS: Baseline median hs-CRP values were 2.1 mg/l (interquartile range (IQR) 0.9-5.2) and 2.0 mg/l (IQR 0.8-3.0) and after 2 years these levels decreased to 1.1 mg/l (IQR 0.6-2.4) and 1.5 mg/l (IQR 0.6-3.0) in the atorvastatin 80 mg and simvastatin 40 mg group, respectively. These changes were significant within as well as between the two groups. No correlations were observed between change in hs-CRP after 2 years and change in lipids. A significant correlation was found in univariate analysis between the decrease of hs-CRP and the reduction of IMT. CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that atorvastatin 80 mg reduces hs-CRP levels to a greater extent than simvastatin 40 mg. Furthermore, we show that the extent of hs-CRP reduction is associated with the progression rate of the atherosclerotic process as measured by IMT.

Smilde TJ, van Wissen S, Wollersheim H, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF. · Department of Medicine, University Medical Center Nijmegen, Netherlands. · Lancet. · Pubmed #11558482 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: High LDL-cholesterol is a risk factor for atherosclerosis. We aimed to determine whether aggressive cholesterol lowering with statins was more effective than conventional statin treatment in this disease. We investigated the effect of high-dose atorvastatin on carotid atherosclerosis progression. METHOD: We did a randomised, double-blind clinical trial in 325 patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. Patients were given either atorvastatin 80 mg (n=160) or simvastatin 40 mg (n=165) daily, on an intent-to-treat basis. The primary endpoint was the change of carotid intima media thickness (IMT), as measured by quantitative B-mode ultrasound, over 2 years. FINDINGS: The overall baseline IMT, combining the measurements of the common and internal carotid artery and the carotid bifurcation on both sides, was 0.93 mm (SD 0.22) and 0.92 mm (0.21) in the atorvastatin and simvastatin groups, respectively. After treatment with atorvastatin for 2 years, IMT decreased (-0.031 mm [95% CI -0.007 to -0.055]; p=0.0017), whereas in the simvastatin group it increased (0.036 [0.014-0.058]; p=0.0005). The change in thickness differed significantly between the two groups (p=0.0001). Atorvastatin showed greater reductions in cholesterol concentrations than did simvastatin. HDL-cholesterol concentrations increased in both groups. Both drugs were equally well tolerated. INTERPRETATION: Our results show that aggressive LDL-cholesterol reduction by atorvastatin was accompanied by regression of carotid intima media thickness in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia, whereas conventional LDL lowering was not.

van Dam MJ, Penn HJ, den Hartog FR, Kragten HA, Trip MD, Buirma RJ, Kastelein JJ, Anonymous00279. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #11318080 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Use of cholesterol-lowering regimens has been shown to reduce the risk of coronary heart disease (CHD), both in primary and secondary prevention. However, there have been few studies of the relative benefits and risks of the various cholesterol-lowering agents in patient groups with specific risk factors for CHD. OBJECTIVE: The primary goal of this study was to compare the proportions of adult patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and a moderate to high risk for CHD achieving National Cholesterol Education Program low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals with titrate-to-goal regimens of simvastatin and fluvastatin. METHODS: This was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study enrolling adult patients with type IIa or IIb primary hypercholesterolemia, LDL-C levels <6.0 mmol/L (<232.0 mg/dL), and triglyceride levels <4.5 mmol/L (<398.6 mg/dL), and either CHD or other atherosclerotic disease (the CHD, or high-risk, group), or multiple risk factors for CHD (the MRF, or moderate-risk, group). After a 6-week washout period, patients were randomized to 18 weeks of treatment at an initial dosage of simvastatin 10 mg once daily or fluvastatin 20 mg once daily. At 6- and 12-week titration visits, the dosage in patients who had not acheived the LDL-C goal could be increased to simvastatin 20 mg once daily and then 40 mg once daily, or to fluvastatin 40 mg once daily and then 40 mg twice daily. Lipid profiles were obtained at each titration visit and at the end of treatment. In addition to the comparison between treatments, secondary comparisons were made between the CHD and MRF subgroups within each treatment group. Statistical significance was assessed using analysis of variance. Results: A total of 478 patients were enrolled, 237 in the simvastatin group and 241 in the fluvastatin group. There were no significant between-group differences in patients' characteristics at baseline. At the end of the study, 60.8% (135/222) of patients in the simvastatin group had reached target LDL-C goals, compared with 35.1% (76/216) in the fluvastatin group (P < 0.001). In the simvastatin CHD and MRF subgroups, 49% and 73%, respectively, reached the LDL-C target, compared with 19% and 50% in the corresponding fluvastatin subgroups (P < 0.001). The proportion of patients requiring titration was higher in the fluvastatin group than in the simvastatin group (87.1% and 64.1%, respectively; P = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: In this study, more patients with primary hypercholesterolemia and CHD or multiple risk factors for CHD reached LDL-C goals with simvastatin treatment and required less titration than those who received fluvastatin treatment.

van der Graaf A, Cuffie-Jackson C, Vissers MN, Trip MD, Gagné C, Shi G, Veltri E, Avis HJ, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #18940534 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The study evaluated the efficacy and safety of long-term coadministration of ezetimibe and simvastatin in adolescents with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HeFH). BACKGROUND: Aggressive intervention to achieve lipid goals for adolescents with HeFH is recommended to reduce risk of premature cardiovascular disease. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 248 male and female subjects ages >or=10 and <or=17 years with HeFH were randomized to receive: step 1: simvastatin 10, 20, or 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 6 weeks, followed by step 2: simvastatin 40 mg/day plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day or placebo for 27 weeks; followed by step 3: all subjects received open-label simvastatin 10 or 20 mg/day (titrated to maximum 40 mg/day) plus ezetimibe 10 mg/day for 20 weeks. Safety was assessed throughout the study. RESULTS: Coadministered ezetimibe and simvastatin for 6 weeks (step 1) resulted in significantly greater mean reduction in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) from baseline (49.5%) compared with simvastatin monotherapy (34.4%; p < 0.01) in pooled dose groups and in individual dose groups (46.7% vs. 30.4%, 49.5% vs. 34.3%, 52.1% vs. 38.6%, respectively; p < 0.01). At 33 weeks (step 2), ezetimibe-simvastatin subjects had a mean 54.0% reduction in LDL-C compared with a mean 38.1% reduction in simvastatin monotherapy subjects (p < 0.01). At 53 weeks (step 3), the pooled reduction in LDL-C was 49.1%. All treatment regimens were well tolerated throughout 53 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Coadministration of ezetimibe with simvastatin was safe, well tolerated, and provided higher LDL-C reduction compared with simvastatin alone in adolescents with HeFH studied up to 53 weeks. (Effects of Ezetimibe With Simvastatin in the Therapy of Adolescents With Heterozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia; NCT00129402).

van der Graaf A, Rodenburg J, Vissers MN, Hutten BA, Wiegman A, Trip MD, Stroes ES, Wijburg FA, Otvos JD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #18492534 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine lipoprotein particle concentrations and size in children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and investigate the effect of pravastatin therapy on these measures. STUDY DESIGN: Lipoprotein particle concentrations and sizes were examined by nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy in 144 children with FH and 45 unaffected siblings. The effect of pravastatin therapy (20 to 40 mg) on lipoprotein particle concentration and size were compared with placebo after 1 year of treatment, using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Compared with the unaffected siblings, the children with FH had significantly higher concentrations of very-low-density lipoprotein (VLDL) particles (115.6 nmol/L vs 51.2 nmol/L; P < .001) and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) particles (1726.8 nmol/L vs 955.3 nmol/L; P < .001), and lower concentrations of high-density lipoprotein (HDL) particles (23.2 micromol/L vs 26.9 micromol/L; P < .001). Compared with placebo, pravastatin therapy decreased the concentration of VLDL particles by 35.9 nmol/L (P < .001), of total LDL particles by 342.7 nmol/L (P < .001), of large LDL particles by 189.5 nmol/L (P < .001), and of small LDL particles by 156.2 nmol/L (P = .152), but increased the concentration of total HDL particles by 2.2 micromol/L (P < .001), of large HDL particles by 1.0 micromol/L (P = .006), and of medium HDL particles by 1.1 micromol/L (P = .003). VLDL particle size increased by 1.0 nm (P = .032). CONCLUSIONS: Compared with their healthy siblings, children with FH have an atherogenic lipoprotein profile based on their lipoprotein distribution and lipoprotein particle diameter. Pravastatin therapy can improve, but not fully restore, these lipoprotein abnormalities toward normal levels in these children.

Kastelein JJ, Akdim F, Stroes ES, Zwinderman AH, Bots ML, Stalenhoef AF, Visseren FL, Sijbrands EJ, Trip MD, Stein EA, Gaudet D, Duivenvoorden R, Veltri EP, Marais AD, de Groot E, Anonymous00010. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #18376000 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ezetimibe, a cholesterol-absorption inhibitor, reduces levels of low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol when added to statin treatment. However, the effect of ezetimibe on the progression of atherosclerosis remains unknown. METHODS: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, 24-month trial comparing the effects of daily therapy with 80 mg of simvastatin either with placebo or with 10 mg of ezetimibe in 720 patients with familial hypercholesterolemia. Patients underwent B-mode ultrasonography to assess the intima-media thickness of the walls of the carotid and femoral arteries. The primary outcome measure was the change in the mean carotid-artery intima-media thickness, which was defined as the average of the means of the far-wall intima-media thickness of the right and left common carotid arteries, carotid bulbs, and internal carotid arteries. RESULTS: The primary outcome, the mean (+/-SE) change in the carotid-artery intima-media thickness, was 0.0058+/-0.0037 mm in the simvastatin-only group and 0.0111+/-0.0038 mm in the simvastatin-plus-ezetimibe (combined-therapy) group (P=0.29). Secondary outcomes (consisting of other variables regarding the intima-media thickness of the carotid and femoral arteries) did not differ significantly between the two groups. At the end of the study, the mean (+/-SD) LDL cholesterol level was 192.7+/-60.3 mg per deciliter (4.98+/-1.56 mmol per liter) in the simvastatin group and 141.3+/-52.6 mg per deciliter (3.65+/-1.36 mmol per liter) in the combined-therapy group (a between-group difference of 16.5%, P<0.01). The differences between the two groups in reductions in levels of triglycerides and C-reactive protein were 6.6% and 25.7%, respectively, with greater reductions in the combined-therapy group (P<0.01 for both comparisons). Side-effect and safety profiles were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with familial hypercholesterolemia, combined therapy with ezetimibe and simvastatin did not result in a significant difference in changes in intima-media thickness, as compared with simvastatin alone, despite decreases in levels of LDL cholesterol and C-reactive protein. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00552097 [ClinicalTrials.gov].).

Meuwese MC, Trip MD, van Wissen S, van Miert JN, Kastelein JJ, Stroes ES. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Atherosclerosis. · Pubmed #17875305 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Myeloperoxidase (MPO), an antimicrobial enzyme of the innate immune system, has been proposed to exert a wide array of pro-atherogenic effects throughout all stages of the atherosclerotic process. In view of the potent anti-inflammatory effects of statins in vitro, we evaluated the impact of statin therapy on plasma MPO levels in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (FH), treated with either intensive or conventional lipid-lowering therapy. Furthermore, we evaluated the relation between MPO levels and atherosclerosis progression, as determined by intima media thickness (IMT). METHODS: We measured plasma MPO levels, lipoprotein profiles, high sensitivity-C-reactive protein (hs-CRP) as well as IMT of carotid artery segments in 122 FH patients at baseline and after 2-year treatment with atorvastatin 80 mg or simvastatin 40 mg QD. RESULTS: Baseline median MPO values were 147pM (interquartile range (IQR) 122-217) and 144pM (IQR 118-216) and these increased significantly to 221pM (IQR 144-290) and 255pM (IQR 152-324) during 2-year follow-up in both the atorvastatin 80 mg and simvastatin 40 mg group, respectively. There was no correlation between MPO levels and IMT progression, change in lipoproteins or hs-CRP. CONCLUSION: In FH patients, statins do not prevent an increase in MPO levels during follow-up. Moreover, MPO levels are not associated with atherosclerosis progression in these patients.

van Aalst-Cohen ES, Jansen AC, Tanck MW, Defesche JC, Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, Stalenhoef AF, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Eur Heart J. · Pubmed #16825289 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIMS: We assembled a cohort of patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) for both basic and clinical research. We used a set of established diagnostic criteria to define FH. Some put forward that a definite diagnosis of FH is made when a mutation in the LDL-receptor (LDLR) gene is identified. We therefore set out to determine in these patients whether patients with a DNA diagnosis would differ significantly from those diagnosed clinically. METHODS AND RESULTS: We randomly selected 4000 hypercholesterolaemic patients from the Dutch Lipid Clinic network database. Phenotypical data were acquired by reviewing medical records. After review of medical records, 2400 patients could be defined as having FH. An LDLR mutation was identified in 52.3% of these patients. Patients with and without an LDLR mutation demonstrated different clinical and laboratory characteristics. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was higher in patients with an LDLR mutation, whereas triglycerides were higher in patients without an LDLR mutation. The phenotypic differences between the groups remained even after stratification for the presence or absence of tendon xanthomas. CONCLUSION: Despite the use of stringent clinical criteria to define FH patients, two cohorts could be identified within our study population, namely those patients with and those without an LDLR mutation. Our findings suggest that among those without an LDLR mutation, patients with other causes of dyslipidaemia may be present. These observations underline the relevance of genetic testing in FH for clinical practice, for screening purposes, and for research involving these patients.

Jakulj L, Vissers MN, Rodenburg J, Wiegman A, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, and Emma Children's Hospital, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #16647412 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the effect of plant stanols on lipids and endothelial function in pre-pubertal children with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). STUDY DESIGN: Children with FH (n=42), aged 7-12 years, were enrolled in a double-blind crossover trial, in which they consumed 500 mL of a low-fat yogurt enriched with 2.0 g of plant stanols and 500 mL of a low-fat placebo yogurt for 4 weeks, separated by a 6-week washout period. Lipid profiles and endothelial function were assessed after both consumption periods. Endothelial function was measured as flow-mediated dilation (FMD) of the brachial artery. RESULTS: This daily intake of 2.0 g of stanols significantly decreased the levels of total cholesterol (TC) by 7.5% and low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) by 9.2% as compared with placebo. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride levels remained unaltered. The reduction of LDL-C levels did not improve FMD, which was 10.5%+/-5.1% after plant stanol consumption and 10.6%+/-5.0% after placebo consumption, respectively (P=.852). CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates that plant stanols reduce LDL-C levels in children with FH without improving endothelial function.

Rana JS, Jansen AC, Zwinderman AH, Nieuwdorp M, van Aalst-Cohen ES, Jukema JW, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, Room F4-159.2, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. · Diabetes Care. · Pubmed #16644652 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

van Wissen S, Smilde TJ, Trip MD, Stalenhoef AF, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Meibergdreef 9, 1105 AZ Amsterdam,The Netherlands. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #15642565 No free full text.

Abstract: In the 2-year Atorvastatin versus Simvastatin on Atherosclerosis Progression extension study, patients with familial hypercholesterolemia who continued to take atorvastatin 80 mg for an additional 2 years had complete arrest of the progression of mean carotid intima-media thickness (0.89 mm at the start vs 0.90 mm at the end of the study, p = 0.58). In contrast, patients previously taking simvastatin 40 mg had significant regression of intima-media thickness (0.95 mm at the start vs 0.92 mm at the end of the study, p = 0.01). Therefore, both placebo- and statin-treated patients with familial hypercholesterolemia are best treated with high-dose atorvastatin, a therapeutic regimen that induces atherosclerosis regression and is safe and well tolerated over a 4-year period.

Jansen AC, van Aalst-Cohen ES, Tanck MW, Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, Liem AH, van Lennep HW, Sijbrands EJ, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · J Intern Med. · Pubmed #15554949 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the contribution of classical risk factors to the development of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). DESIGN: A retrospective, multi-centre, cohort study. Extensive data were collected by scrutinizing medical records and the use of questionnaires. Multivariate Cox regression was used to study the relationship between potential risk factors and the occurrence of CVD. SETTING AND SUBJECTS: We included 2400 FH patients from 27 Dutch lipid clinics. The diagnosis of FH was based upon the presence of a low-density lipoprotein receptor mutation or upon strict clinical criteria. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Cardiovascular mortality and CVD. RESULTS: During 112.943 person-years, 782 (32.6%) patients had had at least one cardiovascular event. Male gender (RR 2.82, 95% CI 2.37-3.36), smoking (RR 1.67, 95% CI 1.40-1.99), hypertension (RR 1.36, 95% CI 1.06-1.75), diabetes mellitus (RR 2.19, 95% CI 1.36-3.54), low HDL-C (RR 1.37, 95% CI 1.15-1.63) and elevated lipoprotein(a) levels (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.20-1.79) proved to be independent CVD risk factors. These six risk factors explained 18.7% of the variation in the occurrence of CVD. CONCLUSIONS: Male gender, smoking, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, HDL cholesterol and lipoprotein(a) levels proved to be important risk factors for CVD in FH patients. In addition to the routine institution of statin therapy, controlling these factors needs special attention in the management of this disorder.

Netea MG, Hijmans A, van Wissen S, Smilde TJ, Trip MD, Kullberg BJ, de Boo T, Van der Meer JW, Kastelein JJ, Stalenhoef AF, Stalenhorf AF. · University Medical Center, St. Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Eur J Clin Invest. · Pubmed #14764071 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Toll-like receptor-4 (TLR4) is a major receptor for inflammatory stimuli potentially involved in the pathogenesis of atherosclerosis, such as lipopolysaccharide (LPS) and heat-shock proteins. The Asp299Gly polymorphism of the TLR4 gene has been associated with a reduced intima-media thickness (IMT) of the common carotid artery in healthy individuals. We have investigated whether the presence of the Asp299Gly polymorphism in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) has a similar protective effect, and whether it influences the effects of HMG-CoA reductase treatment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of 293 FH patients and 200 healthy volunteers were genotyped for the presence of the Asp299Gly allele using polymerase chain reaction followed by restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis. Intima-media thickness measurements, inflammatory parameters and the effect of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors were compared between the patients with and without Asp299Gly allele. RESULTS: The Asp299Gly allele was present in 10.6% of the FH patients and 11.0% of the healthy individuals. Whereas the FH patients carrying the Asp299Gly allele displayed a reduced absolute IMT value compared with the FH patients carrying the wild-type allelle, the difference did not reach statistical significance. In addition, the effect of treatment with HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors was not influenced by the presence of Asp299Gly allele. CONCLUSION: The presence of the Asp299Gly allele of the TLR4 gene does not seem to exert a major influence on the progression of atherosclerosis in patients with FH.

Nolting PR, de Groot E, Zwinderman AH, Buirma RJ, Trip MD, Kastelein JJ. · Departments of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Arch Intern Med. · Pubmed #12912721 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether high-dose simvastatin therapy could reduce carotid and femoral artery intima-media thickness (IMT) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) to prevent cardiovascular disease. BACKGROUND: Imaging of arterial walls with B-mode ultrasonography is increasingly used as a noninvasive surrogate marker of cardiovascular disease. Intervention trials using this modality have shown that by reducing risk factors, progression of atherosclerosis was inhibited. METHODS: After a washout period of 6 weeks, all patients with FH started monotherapy with simvastatin, 80 mg/d, for 2 years. The primary end point was the change (in millimeters) of the mean combined far-wall IMT of predefined carotid and femoral arterial segments at 2 years. RESULTS: We included a total of 153 patients with FH. Mean +/- SD combined baseline IMT was 1.07 +/- 0.23 mm. After treatment with simvastatin for 2 years, this IMT decreased by a mean of 0.081 mm (95% confidence interval, -0.109 to -0.053; P<.001), with its largest reduction in the femoral artery (-0.283 mm; P<.001). An actual decrease of combined IMT was seen in 69.8% of all patients. CONCLUSIONS: High-dose simvastatin therapy reduces arterial wall IMT in more than two thirds of the patients, with its largest effect on the femoral artery. Furthermore, patients with FH who were treated with both statin and antihypertensive medication experienced a significantly greater benefit in terms of IMT reduction.

van Dam M, Zwart M, de Beer F, Smelt AH, Prins MH, Trip MD, Havekes LM, Lansberg PJ, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, University of Amsterdam, 1105 AZ Amsterdam, Netherlands. · Heart. · Pubmed #12181212 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Fibric acid derivatives and HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors are effective in combination for treating patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia and severe combined dyslipidaemia, but combination therapy affects compliance and increases the risk of side effects. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of monotherapy with atorvastatin, an HMG-CoA reductase inhibitor with superior efficacy in lowering low density lipoprotein cholesterol and triglyceride concentrations, in patients with dysbetalipoproteinaemia and severe combined dyslipidaemia. METHODS: Atorvastatin was tested as single drug treatment in 36 patients with familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia and 23 patients with severe combined dyslipidaemia. RESULTS: After 40 weeks of 40 mg atorvastatin treatment decreases in total cholesterol, triglycerides, and apolipoprotein B of 40%, 43%, and 41%, respectively, were observed in the combined dyslipidaemia group, and of 46%, 40%, and 43% in the dysbetalipoproteinaemic patients. Target concentrations of total cholesterol (< 5 mmol/l) were reached by 63% of the patients, and target concentrations of triglycerides (< 3.0 mmol/l) by 66%. Treatment with atorvastatin was well tolerated and no serious side effects were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Atorvastatin is very effective as monotherapy in the treatment of familial dysbetalipoproteinaemia and severe combined dyslipidaemia.

Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, de Jongh S, Kastelein JJ. · Afd. Cardiologie, Academisch Medisch Centrum, DD Amsterdam. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #10932693 No free full text.

Abstract: A man aged 35 and a woman aged 30 visited a lipid clinic because of a raised total cholesterol level, which was also present in a number of first-degree relatives. Apart from the lipid abnormalities they had no risk factors for coronary disease. Both proved to have familial hypercholesterolaemia. The man had vague angina pectoris symptoms and a high dose of cholesterol synthesis inhibitors was prescribed. Coronary angiography showed severe stenoses; a coronary balloon angioplasty was successfully performed. The woman, however, died at age 33 suddenly from myocardial infarction. Familial hypercholesterolaemia may cause unexpected cardiovascular complications and sudden death of young persons. Timely diagnosis of the condition on the basis of adequate anamnesis and thorough physical examination, more rapid administration of cholesterol-lowering agents and alertness for anginous complaints may prevent myocardial infarctions and save lives in these patients.

Lombardi MP, Redeker EJ, Defesche JC, Kamerling SW, Trip MD, Mannens MM, Havekes LM, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Clin Genet. · Pubmed #10735632 No free full text.

Abstract: Mutations in the LDL receptor are responsible for familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). At present, more than 600 mutations of the LDL receptor gene are known to underlie FH. However, the array of mutations varies considerably in different populations. Therefore, the delineation of essentially all LDL receptor gene mutations in a population represents a prerequisite for the implementation of nation-wide genetic testing for FH. In this study, the frequency and geographical distribution of 13 known mutations were evaluated in a cohort of 1223 FH patients. We identified 358 mutation carriers, representing 29% of the FH cohort. Four mutations (N543H-2393de19, 1359--1G-->A, 313 + 1 G-->A and W23X) occurred with a relatively high frequency, accounting for 22.4% of the entire study cohort. Two of these common FH mutations (N543H-2393de19 and 1359 - 1G-->A) showed a preferential geographic distribution. Second, to further expand the array of LDL receptor gene mutations, we conducted mutation analysis by denaturing gradient gel electrophoresis (DGGE) in 141 children with definite FH. A mutation was identified in 111 patients, involving 16 new single base substitutions and four small deletions and insertions, which brings the number of different FH-causing mutations in our country up to 61. Our data indicate that an estimate of the prevalence of specific mutations, as well as the compilation of a database of all FH-causing mutations in a given country, can facilitate selection of the most appropriate molecular diagnostic approach.

Wittekoek ME, Moll E, Pimstone SN, Trip MD, Lansberg PJ, Defesche JC, van Doormaal JJ, Hayden MR, Kastelein JJ. · Department of Vascular Medicine, Academic Medical Centre, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. · Pubmed #10559015 links to  free full text

Abstract: The D9N substitution is a common mutation in the lipoprotein lipase (LPL) gene. This mutation has been associated with reduced levels of HDL cholesterol and elevated triglycerides (TG) in a wide variety of patients. We investigated the influence of this D9N mutation on lipid and lipoprotein levels and risk for cardiovascular disease (CVD) in patients with familial hypercholesterolemia (FH). A total of 2091 FH heterozygotes, all of Dutch extraction, were screened for the D9N mutation using standard polymerase chain reaction techniques, followed by specific enzyme digestion. A total of 94 FH subjects carried the D9N mutation at a carrier frequency of 4.5%. Carriers of other common LPL mutations, such as the N291S and the S447X were excluded. Clinical data on 80 FH individuals carrying the D9N were available and were compared with a FH control group matched for age, sex, and body mass index (n=203). Analysis revealed significantly higher TG (P=0.01) and lower HDL-cholesterol levels (P=0.002). Dyslipidemia was more pronounced in D9N carriers with higher body mass index. Moreover, FH patients carrying this common LPL mutation were at higher risk for CVD, (odds ratio=2.8; 95% CI, 1.43 to 5.32; P=0.002). The common D9N LPL mutation leads to increased TG and decreased HDL plasma levels in patients with FH. These effects are most apparent in those FH heterozygotes with an increased body mass index. Furthermore, this mutation, present in 4.5% of Dutch FH heterozygotes, leads to increased risk for CVD.