Hyperlipidemias: Hadfield SG

Humphries SE, Norbury G, Leigh S, Hadfield SG, Nair D. · Division of Cardiovascular Genetics, British Heart Foundation Laboratories, Department of Medicine, Royal Free and UCL Medical School, London, UK. · Curr Opin Lipidol. · Pubmed #18607183 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Familial hypercholesterolaemia is a common genetic disorder of lipid metabolism in which patients have a significantly elevated risk of early coronary heart disease, which can be substantially lowered by treatment with the statin class of drugs. In many countries in Europe, tracing of relatives using DNA information, once the family mutation has been identified, is being actively carried out. The present review examines the specificity and clinical utility of DNA testing in patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia. RECENT FINDINGS: Technological progress has improved the detection rate in patients with the strongest clinical suspicion of familial hypercholesterolaemia to more than 70-80%. Patients carrying a mutation have, on average, higher low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels and greater risk of early coronary heart disease, and studies have reported the utility of DNA information in the identification of affected relatives. More than 1000 different molecular causes of familial hypercholesterolaemia are documented in the University College London database, and although more than 90% of these clearly cause familial hypercholesterolaemia, the remainder require careful interpretation. SUMMARY: DNA testing, as an adjunct to the measurement of plasma low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, has clinical utility in providing an unequivocal diagnosis in patients and in identifying affected relatives at an early age so that they can be offered lifestyle advice and appropriate lipid-lowering therapies. Researchers and DNA diagnostic laboratories need to interpret novel sequence changes with caution in order to avoid a false positive diagnosis.

Hadfield SG, Humphries SE. · London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, London, UK. · Curr Opin Lipidol. · Pubmed #15990592 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Cascade testing is an important method for identifying individuals at risk of a genetic condition. Recent advances in its application to familial hypercholesterolaemia are reviewed to identify potential problems impeding its application and the extent to which current data address these concerns. RECENT FINDINGS: Different paradigms for cascade testing are being applied in national programmes. Current data demonstrates cost-effectiveness, and an increased uptake of preventive measures. The relationship between molecular and clinical diagnostic methods is discussed. Psychological impacts of a diagnosis of familial hypercholesterolaemia are in line with the risks associated with the disorder. The efficacy of statins in improving vascular function of children with familial hypercholesterolaemia has been demonstrated, but extensive safety data are lacking. Ethical arguments support that it is equally acceptable for relatives of familial hypercholesterolaemia patients to be contacted by healthcare workers as by family members, but the former is likely to be more efficient. Concerns about increased life insurance premiums are valid but insurance companies are assessing risk realistically, so this should not be a barrier to cascade testing. SUMMARY: Current data support the implementation of cascade testing for familial hypercholesterolaemia as being feasible and cost-effective, but national implementation is limited to a small number of countries. Funding and the infrastructure to support it may be the major stumbling blocks in implementing this technique in many countries. Concerns about the ethics of carrying out cascade testing, and the potential psychological damage of DNA testing, appear to have been largely addressed for familial hypercholesterolaemia.

Hadfield SG, Horara S, Starr BJ, Yazdgerdi S, Marks D, Bhatnagar D, Cramb R, Egan S, Everdell R, Ferns G, Jones A, Marenah CB, Marples J, Prinsloo P, Sneyd A, Stewart MF, Sandle L, Wang T, Watson MS, Humphries SE, Anonymous00028. · Institute of Child Health, London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, UCL, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH. · Ann Clin Biochem. · Pubmed #19028807 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Family tracing is a method recognized to find new patients with familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH). We have implemented family tracing led by FH Nurses and have determined acceptability to patients, feasibility and costs. METHODS: Nurses were located at five National Health Service (NHS) Trusts; they identified FH patients and offered them family tracing. Responses and test results were recorded on a database and summarized on a family pedigree. RESULTS: The majority ( approximately 70%) of index cases participated; the proportion was lower when patients had been discharged from the clinics and in metropolitan areas. On average, 34% (range 13-50%) of relatives lived outside the catchment area of the clinics and could not attend the nurse-led FH clinics. Of the previously untested relatives, 76% who lived in the catchment area of the clinic came forward to be tested. One-third of the relatives who came forward for testing were children <or=16 y of age. The proportion of relatives diagnosed as likely to have FH was lower than would be predicted (30% vs. 50%). This was mainly due to the uncertainty of a diagnosis based on lipid measurements. The average cost to identify and test one relative was approximately pound 500 but was higher in the metropolitan areas. CONCLUSION: Cascade testing for FH in the UK is feasible, acceptable and likely to be cost-effective if it is a routine aspect of clinical care. However, national implementation would require an integrated infrastructure, so that all individuals have access to testing, and specialist services for the management of young people.

Starr B, Hadfield SG, Hutten BA, Lansberg PJ, Leren TP, Damgaard D, Neil HA, Humphries SE. · London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, London, UK. · Clin Chem Lab Med. · Pubmed #18601600 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The plasma total and low-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (LDL-C) levels that are used as diagnostic criteria for familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) probands in the general population are too stringent for use in relatives, given the higher prior probability of a first-degree relative being FH (50% vs. 1/500). Our objective was therefore to develop more appropriate LDL-C cutoffs to identify "affected" first-degree relatives found by cascade testing, to test their accuracy and utility in case identification, and to compare them with the published "Make early diagnosis to prevent disease" (MEDPED) cutoffs from the US. METHODS: Using a large, anonymised sample of genetically tested first-degree relatives of Netherlands FH probands (mutation carriers/non-carriers, n=825/2,469), age- and gender-specific LDL-C diagnostic cutoffs for first-degree relatives were constructed. These were used to test similar data from Denmark (n=160/161) and Norway (n=374/742). RESULTS: Gender-specific LDL-C diagnostic cutoffs were established for six different age groups, which achieved an overall accuracy (measured as Youden's index) of 0.53 in the Netherlands data, and performed significantly better amongst younger (<25 years) compared to older first-degree relatives (0.68 vs. 0.42 Youden's index, p<0.001). Compared with the Netherlands data, age- and gender-adjusted mean LDL-C levels were significantly higher (approximately 0.5 mmol/L) in the Denmark and Norway subjects for both mutation carriers and non-carriers. After adjusting for this difference, the LDL-C cut-offs showed a similar accuracy in identifying mutation carriers from Denmark (81%, range 78%-86%) and Norway (84%, range 82%-86%). Although the MEDPED cutoffs performed significantly worse than these for the Netherlands data (p<0.001), they performed equally well in overall accuracy for the Norwegian and Danish data, although the LDL-C cutoffs had a significantly higher sensitivity but lower specificity for all three countries. CONCLUSIONS: The cutoffs developed here are designed to give the greatest overall accuracy when testing relatives of FH patients in the absence of a genetic diagnosis. They have a more balanced specificity and sensitivity than the MEDPED cutoffs that are designed to achieve higher specificity, which is more appropriate for cascade testing purposes. The data suggest that country-specific LDL-C cutoffs may lead to greater accuracy for identifying FH patients, but should be used with caution and only when a genetic diagnosis (DNA) is not available.

Hadfield SG, Horara S, Starr BJ, Yazdgerdi S, Bhatnagar D, Cramb R, Egan S, Everdell R, Ferns G, Jones A, Marenah CB, Marples J, Prinsloo P, Sneyd A, Stewart MF, Sandle L, Wang T, Watson MS, Humphries SE. · London IDEAS Genetics Knowledge Park, Institute of Child Health, University College London, 30 Guilford Street, London WC1N 1EH, UK. · Ann Clin Biochem. · Pubmed #18325186 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Familial hypercholesterolaemia (FH) is an autosomal co-dominant disorder which is relatively common, leads to high levels of LDL-cholesterol and if untreated to early coronary heart disease. An audit of current practice at National Health Service Trusts in England was undertaken to determine whether FH patients meet the diagnostic criteria for FH; are being offered appropriate advice and treatment; and to what extent their families are contacted and offered testing for the disorder. METHODS: Medical records of known FH patients (over 18 years of age and diagnosed before 31 December 2003) were accessed to obtain information on diagnosis, treatment and family tracing. RESULTS: The records of 733 FH patients were examined, 79% met the UK 'Simon Broome' register criteria for the diagnosis of definite or possible FH. Analyses showed that patients were usually offered appropriate advice and treatment, with 89% being on a statin. However, the audit indicated a high variability in family tracing between the sites, with significant differences in the frequency of inclusion of a family pedigree in the notes (range 1-71%, mean 35%); the general practitioner (GP) being advised that first-degree relatives should be tested (range 4-52%, mean 27%); and the proportion of relatives contacted and tested (range 6-50%, mean 32%). CONCLUSION: FH patients are well cared for in lipid clinics in England, are being given appropriate lifestyle advice and medication, but an increase in recording of LDL-cholesterol levels may lead to improvements in their management. Practice in family tracing appears to vary widely between clinics.