Hyperlipidemias: Gohlke H

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 6 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Hyperlipidemias," originating from Planet Earth —» Gohlke H.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Guidelines on diabetes, pre-diabetes, and cardiovascular diseases: executive summary. The Task Force on Diabetes and Cardiovascular Diseases of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and of the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD). free! 2007

Rydén L, Standl E, Bartnik M, Van den Berghe G, Betteridge J, de Boer MJ, Cosentino F, Jönsson B, Laakso M, Malmberg K, Priori S, Ostergren J, Tuomilehto J, Thrainsdottir I, Vanhorebeek I, Stramba-Badiale M, Lindgren P, Qiao Q, Priori SG, Blanc JJ, Budaj A, Camm J, Dean V, Deckers J, Dickstein K, Lekakis J, McGregor K, Metra M, Morais J, Osterspey A, Tamargo J, Zamorano JL, Deckers JW, Bertrand M, Charbonnel B, Erdmann E, Ferrannini E, Flyvbjerg A, Gohlke H, Juanatey JR, Graham I, Monteiro PF, Parhofer K, Pyörälä K, Raz I, Schernthaner G, Volpe M, Wood D, Anonymous00256, Anonymous00257. · Department of Cardiology, Karolinska University Hospital, Sweden. · Eur Heart J. · Pubmed #17220161 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

2 Guideline [Recommendations for an extensive risk decrease for patients with coronary disease, vascular diseases and diabetes. Issued by the Executive Committee of the German Society of Cardiology, Heart and Circulation Research, reviewed on behalf of the Clinical Cardiology Commission by the Prevention Project Group] 2001

Gohlke H, Kübler W, Mathes P, Meinertz T, Schuler G, Gysan DB, Sauer G, Anonymous00156. · No affiliation provided · Z Kardiol. · Pubmed #11263006 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

3 Review [Primary prevention of cardiovascular disease] 2005

Gohlke H. · Klinische Kardiologie II, Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen. · Dtsch Med Wochenschr. · Pubmed #15619173 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

4 Review [Recommendations for statin therapy in the elderly] 2004

Döser S, März W, Reinecke MF, Ringleb P, Schultz A, Schwandt P, Becker HJ, Bönner G, Buerke M, Diener HC, Gohlke H, Keil U, Ringelstein EB, Steinmetz A, Gladisch R, Wehling M. · IV. Medizinische Klinik, Fakultät für Klinische Medizin Mannheim, Ruprecht-Karls-Universität Heidelberg. · Internist (Berl). · Pubmed #15340698 No free full text.

Abstract: Elderly patients are significantly less likely to receive statins than younger patients possibly because of doubts regarding compliance or concerns regarding the increased likelihood of adverse events and drug interactions. Poor compliance can be expected especially in patients suffering from dementia or depression as well as those whose stage of cardiovascular disease exhibits few symptoms. On the other hand, the clinical significance of CHD events is high in the elderly, and 80% of coronary deaths occur in patients aged over 65 years. The average statistical life expectancy of elderly and old patients is often underestimated. The HPS and PROSPER studies showed that statins reduce mortality and morbidity even in very elderly individuals with a high global cardiovascular risk and/or CAD. Patients up to the age of 79 years should be treated according to the same guidelines as younger patients. Statin therapy should only be considered for patients aged 80 years and older who are at a very high risk for cardiovascular events.

5 Article [The global risk for cardiovascular disease. Who is a candidate for pharmacological prevention?] 2004

Gohlke H. · Klinische Kardiologie II, Herz-Zentrum Bad Krozingen, Südring 15, 79189 Bad Krozingen, Germany. · Z Kardiol. · Pubmed #15021989 No free full text.

Abstract: Despite the epidemiological importance of coronary artery disease, cardiovascular events are rare from the individual viewpoint. There is considerable uncertainty when to start medical treatment. A given risk factor modification results in a relative risk reduction independent of the global risk. Therefore the global risk determines the absolute benefit of a preventive measure. The global risk can be estimated using different scoring systems. Using the global risk and the expected relative risk reduction, the Number Needed to Treat (NNT) to avoid one event or cardiac death can be calculated. The NNT is a measure for the usefulness of a preventive intervention. A NNT of < 200 appears acceptable for primary prevention. This can be achieved with pharmacological preventive strategies if the global risk of 10 years is > or = 20%. As age is one of the most important risk predictors the need for treatment at comparable risk factor constellations is age dependent. Risk stratification with estimation of the NNT is therefore important for the decision to treat or not to treat.

6 Article [Current prescription practice of CSE inhibitors at clinic discharge after acute myocardial infarct] 2001

Wienbergen H, Schiele R, Gitt AK, Schneider S, Heer T, Gohlke H, Gottwik M, Thiele R, Keysser M, Horsch A, Weizel A, Senges J, Anonymous00190. · Herzzentrum Ludwigshafen Medizinische Klinik B Bremserstrasse 79 67063 Ludwigshafen, Germany. · Z Kardiol. · Pubmed #11486573 No free full text.

Abstract: We investigated the use of statins in clinical practice in patients with acute myocardial infarction in Germany in 17,732 consecutively included patients of the registries MIR-1 and MITRA-1. A clinical follow-up has been performed in the MITRA-1 study after a mean period of 18 months. In total 30% of all patients with acute myocardial infarction received statins at discharge. From 1994 to 1998 the use of statins increased from 6% to 44%; however in 1998 still less than half of the patients with acute myocardial infarction received statins at discharge. In a logistic regression model, concomittant diseases as renal failure (OR 0.7), heart failure (OR 0.7) and diabetes mellitus (OR 0.9) were associated with a lower use of statins. Age > 70 years (OR 0.5) was also associated with a lower use of statins at hospital discharge. Patients with statins at discharge had a lower long-term mortality of 5.8% versus 12.9% in patients without statins. After adjustment to age and comorbidity, use of statins at discharge was associated with a borderline significant reduction of long-term mortality (multivariate OR 0.7, 95% CI 0.4-1.0). In a subgroup analysis of therapeutic benefit, measured by the "number needed to treat" (NNT), the number of patients to treat with statins to save one life, patients with cardiovascular risk factors, as heart failure (NNT 7.5), diabetes mellitus (NNT 7.8) and age > 70 years (NNT 13.8) had a larger therapeutic benefit as patients without these risk factors (NNT 345). However, these high-risk patients received less often statins than patients without risk factors (use of statins 11.8% versus 19.8%).