HIV Seropositivity: Moyle G

Pozniak A, Gazzard B, Anderson J, Babiker A, Churchill D, Collins S, Fisher M, Johnson M, Khoo S, Leen C, Loveday C, Moyle G, Nelson M, Peter B, Phillips A, Pillay D, Wilkins E, Williams I, Youle M, Anonymous00074. · Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. · HIV Med. · Pubmed #14511246 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Boffito M, Dickinson L, Hill A, Back D, Moyle G, Nelson M, Higgs C, Fletcher C, Mandalia S, Gazzard B, Pozniak A. · Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #15259905 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the steady-state pharmacokinetics and safety of two once-daily saquinavir/ritonavir (SQV/RTV) regimens, 1600/100 and 2000/100 mg, in HIV-positive patients. METHODS: Eighteen HIV-infected adults treated with the standard twice-daily SQV/RTV 1000/100 mg regimen were enrolled in this open-label, two-phase, crossover pharmacokinetic study. The steady-state pharmacokinetics of SQV administered with 100 mg RTV were investigated following once-daily doses of 1600 mg or 2000 mg or a twice-daily dose of 1000 mg. Plasma drug concentrations were determined by high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry and pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated using a non-compartmental model. RESULTS: Compared with SQV 1000 mg twice daily, the Cmax of SQV following a 1600 mg and 2000 mg dose increased in a dose-proportional manner [geometric mean (95% CI) 1915 (1656-2850) ng/ml for 1000 mg, 2782 (2249-4330) ng/ml for 1600 mg and 4179 (3429-6105) ng/ml for 2000 mg doses, respectively]. SQV Ctrough values were 539 (453-1011), 106 (76-223) and 231 (75-822) ng/ml, respectively. A SQV Ctrough value greater than 100 ng/ml was achieved in all subjects on the twice-daily regimen, in 9/18 (50%) subjects on the 1600/100 mg once-daily regimen, and in 14/17 (82%) subjects on the 2000/100 mg once-daily regimen. The once-daily regimens were well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate gastrointestinal symptoms being the only events reported by a small number of patients. CONCLUSION: This is the first study to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of once-daily SQV/RTV 2000/100 mg in HIV-infected subjects. Our findings suggest that this regimen may be an alternative to twice-daily 1000/100 mg doses and should be further evaluated in efficacy studies. The data indicate that most patients (14/17) on once-daily 2000/100 mg achieve trough concentrations above target values (determined for HIV wild-type) for efficacy of SQV with the use of just 100 mg RTV/day and with good tolerability.

Smith NA, Shaw T, Berry N, Vella C, Okorafor L, Taylor D, Ainsworth J, Choudhury A, Daniels RS, El-Gadi S, Fakoya A, Moyle G, Oxford J, Tedder R, O'Shea S, de Ruiter A, Breuer J. · Chelsea Hospital, London, UK. · J Infect. · Pubmed #11531319 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate clinical and RNA load response to antiretroviral therapy amongst patients infected with HIV-2 and to study the development of drug resistance. METHODS: Seven HIV-2 seropositive patients were monitored with clinical examination, CD4 cell count and HIV-2 viral RNA load. Viruses from four subjects were genotyped and in vitro recovery of virus by co-cultivation with PBMCs and HVS T-cells was attempted. Viruses isolated from two subjects were assayed for phenotypic antiviral resistance. The main outcome measures were the relationship between disease stage, viral load, CD4 cell count, viral subtype and the clinical course of HIV-2 infection and the effect of combination antiretroviral therapy on disease progression, CD4 cell count, HIV-2 RNA viral load and drug resistance. RESULTS: The median time of follow-up was 3 years (range 0-8 years). Three patients had AIDS, and one had symptomatic disease. Of the four patients genotyped, three were infected with HIV-2 subtype B and one with subtype A. Viraemia was detectable only at CD4 counts of less than 300 x 10(6)/ml. Two patients with high viral loads failed to respond to antiretroviral therapy although their treatment may not have been optimal. One developed in vitro phenotypic antiviral resistance. The genotype of this patient's viral reverse transcriptase is being analysed. CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to HIV-1, HIV-2 RNA levels were often undetectable despite advanced disease and low CD4 cell counts. However, HIV-2 was clearly capable of causing CD4 cell depletion resulting in symptomatic disease. The principles of highly active antiretroviral therapy seem to apply to HIV-2 and suboptimal therapy may lead to drug resistance. The timing of therapy initiation, monitoring of response and the measurement of resistance remain unresolved issues and conclusions cannot be extrapolated from HIV-1.