Hepatitis: Taieb J

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 5 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Hepatitis," originating from Planet Earth —» Taieb J.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Editorial Anti-tumor necrosis factor-alpha therapy in severe alcoholic hepatitis: are large randomized trials still possible? 2003

Poynard T, Thabut D, Chryssostalis A, Taieb J, Ratziu V. · No affiliation provided · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #12663246 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

2 Review [Fundamental and translational research on hepatocellular carcinoma in 2008: forces and priorities] 2009

Zucman-Rossi J, Clément B, Buendia MA, Lerat H, Beers BV, Bedossa P, Taieb J, Rosenbaum J. · Inserm, U674 ; université Paris-Diderot-Paris-VII, 75010 Paris, France. · Bull Cancer. · Pubmed #19211359 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatocellular carcinogenesis is usually the result of a muti-step process. It begins with an exposure to various risk factors; followed by the development of a chronic hepatitis and cirrhosis that is a pre-neoplastic step; and finally after the occurrence of an hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), different molecular events control aggressiveness of the tumors. The aim of this work was to identify in the international context, forces and priorities of the fundamental and translational HCC research.

3 Review Mechanisms of alcoholic liver disease: cytokines. 2001

Neuman MG, Brenner DA, Rehermann B, Taieb J, Chollet-Martin S, Cohard M, Garaud JJ, Poynard T, Katz GG, Cameron RG, Shear NH, Gao B, Takamatsu M, Yamauchi M, Ohata M, Saito S, Maeyama S, Uchikoshi T, Toda G, Kumagi T, Akbar SM, Abe M, Michitaka K, Horiike N, Onji M. · Sunnybrook and Women's College Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto, Ontario, Canada. · Alcohol Clin Exp Res. · Pubmed #11391079 No free full text.

Abstract: This article represents the proceedings of a workshop at the 2000 ISBRA Meeting in Yokohama, Japan. The chair was Manuela G. Neuman. The presentations were (1) New aspects of hepatic fibrosis, by D. A. Brenner; (2) Cellular immune response in hepatitis C models, by B. Rehermann; (3) The role of interleukin-10 in acute alcoholic hepatitis, by J. Taieb, S. Chollet-Martin, M. Cohard, J. J. Garaud, and T. Poynard; (4) Cytokine-mediated apoptosis in vitro, by M. G. Neuman; (5) Signaling for apoptosis and repair in vitro, by G. G. Katz, R. G. Cameron, N. H. Shear, and M. G. Neuman; (6) Interferons activate the P42/44 mitogen-activated protein kinase and Janus Kinase signal transducers and activation of transcription (JAK-STAT) signaling pathways in hepatocytes: Differential regulation by acute ethanol via a protein kinase C-dependent mechanism, by B. Gao; (7) Genetic polymorphisms of interleukin-1 in association with the development of Japanese alcoholic liver disease, by M. Takamatsu, M. Yamauchi, M. Ohata, S. Saito, S. Maeyama, T. Uchikoshi, and G. Toda; and (8) Increased levels of macrophage migration inhibitory factor in sera from patients with alcoholic liver diseases, by T. Kumagi, S. M. F. Akbar, M. Abe, K. Michitaka, N. Horiike, and M. Onji.

4 Article The diagnostic value of biomarkers (AshTest) for the prediction of alcoholic steato-hepatitis in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease. 2006

Thabut D, Naveau S, Charlotte F, Massard J, Ratziu V, Imbert-Bismut F, Cazals-Hatem D, Abella A, Messous D, Beuzen F, Munteanu M, Taieb J, Moreau R, Lebrec D, Poynard T. · Department of Hepato-Gastroenterology, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 CNRS UMR 8149, Paris Cedex 13, France. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #16580087 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim was to identify a panel of biomarkers (AshTest) for the diagnosis of alcoholic steato-hepatitis (ASH), in patients with chronic alcoholic liver disease. METHODS: Biomarkers were assessed in patients with an alcohol intake>50 g/d, in a training group, and in two validation groups. Diagnosis of ASH (polymorphonuclear infiltrate and hepatocellular necrosis) and its histological severity (four classes: none, mild, moderate and severe) were assessed blindly. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-five patients were included, 70 in the training group, 155 in the validation groups, and 299 controls. AshTest was constructed using a combination of the six components of FibroTest-ActiTest plus aspartate aminotransferase. The AshTest area under the ROC curves for moderate-severe ASH was 0.90 in the training group, 0.88 and 0.89 in the validation groups. The median AshTest value was 0.005 in controls, 0.05 in patients without or with mild ASH, 0.64 in moderate, and 0.84 in severe ASH grade 3, (P<0.05 between all groups). At a 0.50 cut-off, the sensitivity of AshTest was 0.80 and the specificity was 0.84. CONCLUSIONS: In heavy drinkers, AshTest is a simple and non-invasive quantitative estimate of alcoholic hepatitis. The use of AshTest may reduce the need for liver biopsy, and therefore allow an earlier treatment of alcoholic hepatitis.

5 Article Truth survival in clinical research: an evidence-based requiem? free! 2002

Poynard T, Munteanu M, Ratziu V, Benhamou Y, Di Martino V, Taieb J, Opolon P. · Service d'Hépato-Gastroentérologie, Groupe Hospitalier Pitié-Salpêtrière, 47-83 Boulevard de l'Hôpital, 75651 Paris Cedex 13, France. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #12069563 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: Factors associated with the survival of truth of clinical conclusions in the medical literature are unknown. The authors hypothesized that conclusions derived from studies using better methodology should have a longer half-life. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE and hand searches of journals with studies on cirrhosis and hepatitis. STUDY SELECTION: Original articles and meta-analyses published from 1945 to 1999 about cirrhosis or hepatitis in adults. DATA SYNTHESIS: In 2000, 285 of 474 conclusions (60%) were still considered to be true, 91 (19%) were considered to be obsolete, and 98 (21%) were considered to be false. The half-life of truth was 45 years. The 20-year survival of conclusions derived from meta-analysis was lower (57% +/- 10%) than that from nonrandomized studies (87% +/- 2%) (P < 0.001) or randomized trials (85% +/- 3%) (P < 0.001). The survival of conclusions was not different when studies of high methodologic quality were compared with those of low quality. In randomized trials, the 50-year survival rate was higher for 52 negative conclusions (68% +/- 13%) than for 118 positive conclusions (14% +/- 4%) (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Contrary to the authors' hypothesis, conclusions based on recognized, good methodology had no clear survival advantage. To better convince clinicians of the long-term utility of evidence-based medicine, better prognostic factors should be developed.