Hepatitis: Shouval D

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 52 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Hepatitis," originating from Planet Earth —» Shouval D.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Hepatitis B virus, hepatitis C virus and other blood-borne infections in healthcare workers: guidelines for prevention and management in industrialised countries. 2008

FitzSimons D, François G, De Carli G, Shouval D, Prüss-Ustün A, Puro V, Williams I, Lavanchy D, De Schryver A, Kopka A, Ncube F, Ippolito G, Van Damme P. · World Health Organization, Geneva, Switzerland. · Occup Environ Med. · Pubmed #18562683 No free full text.

Abstract: The Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board (VHPB) convened a meeting of international experts from the public and private sectors in order to review and evaluate the epidemiology of blood-borne infections in healthcare workers, to evaluate the transmission of hepatitis B and C viruses as an occupational risk, to discuss primary and secondary prevention measures and to review recommendations for infected healthcare workers and (para)medical students. This VHPB meeting outlined a number of recommendations for the prevention and control of viral hepatitis in the following domains: application of standard precautions, panels for counselling infected healthcare workers and patients, hepatitis B vaccination, restrictions on the practice of exposure-prone procedures by infected healthcare workers, ethical and legal issues, assessment of risk and costs, priority setting by individual countries and the role of the VHPB. Participants also identified a number of terms that need harmonization or standardisation in order to facilitate communication between experts.

2 Editorial What is the clinical significance of the high prevalence of occult hepatitis B in US liver transplant patients with chronic hepatitis C? free! 2008

Shouval D. · No affiliation provided · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #18383088 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

3 Editorial Adoptive transfer of immunity to HBV in liver transplant patients: a step forward toward the proof of concept for therapeutic vaccination or a transient immunologic phenomenon? free! 2007

Shouval D. · No affiliation provided · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #17192904 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

4 Editorial The questionable role of immunization against hepatitis B in HBV infected liver transplant patients. 2005

Samuel D, Shouval D. · No affiliation provided · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #15975686 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

5 Editorial Is universal vaccination against hepatitis B sufficient for control of HBV infection? Lessons from the immunization campaign in Italy. 2000

Shouval D. · No affiliation provided · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #11131438 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

6 Editorial Will transplantation of an hepatitis C-infected graft improve the outcome of liver transplantation in HCV patients? 1999

Féray C, Shouval D, Samuel D. · No affiliation provided · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #10381937 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

7 Review The global impact of vaccination against hepatitis B: a historical overview. 2008

Zanetti AR, Van Damme P, Shouval D. · Department of Public Health-Microbiology-Virology, Faculty of Medicine, University of Milan, Via C. Pascal 36, 20133 Milan, Italy. · Vaccine. · Pubmed #18848855 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection is a world wide public health problem of major concern. HBV infection may lead to chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Vaccination is the most effective measure to control and prevent hepatitis B and its long-term serious sequelae on global scale, both in terms of cost-effectiveness and benefit-cost ratios. According to the WHO recommendations, universal vaccination has been currently implemented in 168 countries world wide with an outstanding record of safety and efficacy. The effective implementation of such programmes of vaccination has resulted in a substantial decrease in disease burden, in the carrier rate and in hepatitis B-related morbidity and mortality. A future challenge is to overcome the social and economic hurdles which still hamper the introduction of hepatitis B vaccination on a global scale.

8 Review Hepatitis A and B vaccination and public health. 2007

Hollinger FB, Bell B, Levy-Bruhl D, Shouval D, Wiersma S, Van Damme P. · Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #17958635 No free full text.

Abstract: The introduction and implementation of hepatitis B vaccination programmes in areas of high endemicity has been very stressful. However, this initial accomplishment has led to the reassessment of priorities in some countries which could undermine these early successes. Work still remains to be done to support and implement interventions that will bring us closer to the WHO goal and to the control of hepatitis B in the community at large. Hepatitis A vaccine strategy for immunizing toddlers is shifting to those countries with intermediate endemicity where increasing morbidity in adults is being observed. Accumulating evidence indicates that such programmes can result in impressive reductions in the incidence of hepatitis A by herd immunity. Monitoring of these populations to determine durability of protection will be important to avoid shifting the infection to the older age population, when symptoms are more likely to occur. National policies need to consider hepatitis A vaccination in the context of other public health priorities.

9 Review Screening, prevention and treatment of viral hepatitis B reactivation in patients with haematological malignancies. 2007

Lalazar G, Rund D, Shouval D. · Liver Unit, Departments of Medicine, Hadassah-Hebrew University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. · Br J Haematol. · Pubmed #17338776 No free full text.

Abstract: The prevalence of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in patients with haematological malignancies is increased compared with the general population worldwide. HBV reactivation is common following chemotherapy and is associated with a high mortality despite prompt anti-viral treatment. HBV reactivation may necessitate interruption of chemotherapy with adverse prognostic consequences for the haematological disease. Chemotherapy-induced immune suppression may lead to increased HBV replication. Immune reconstitution within the weeks and months following recovery from chemotherapy may be associated with a flare of hepatitis B manifested by hepatocellular injury. Risk factors associated with HBV reactivation include detectable hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg), HBV DNA, Hepatitis B e (HBeAg) antigen, antibodies to hepatitis B core antigen (anti-HBc), treatment with corticosteroids, young age and male gender. Lamivudine is effective during HBV reactivation due to immune suppression. Clinical trials have demonstrated that pre-emptive antiviral treatment with lamivudine is superior to deferred treatment. Current recommendations emphasise screening for HBV infection in all haematology patients, particularly prior to chemotherapy. Patients who are HBsAg positive or HBV DNA positive should receive pre-emptive treatment with lamivudine before chemotherapy. The duration of lamivudine treatment may be prolonged commensurate with the degree of immunosuppression. HBV naïve patients should be immunised against hepatitis B, as should haematopoietic stem cell donors. In summary, overt and occult HBV pose a serious, but preventable, threat. Pre-treatment screening of patients at risk should be practiced diligently by all clinicians that treat patients with malignancies.

10 Review Prevention of hepatitis C virus infection. 2004

Kew M, François G, Lavanchy D, Margolis H, Van Damme P, Grob P, Hallauer J, Shouval D, Leroux-Roels G, Meheus A, Anonymous00087. · South African Medical Research Council/Cancer Association of South Africa/University Molecular Hepatology Research Unit, Department of Medicine, University of the Witwatersrand, and Johannesburg Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #15117321 No free full text.

Abstract: In spite of advances made in our understanding of the biology of the hepatitis C virus (HCV), the epidemiology and natural history of HCV infection, and the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, the development and worldwide implementation of a comprehensive prevention and control strategy remains necessary. A World Health Organization informal consultation with the Viral Hepatitis Prevention Board was convened and met in Geneva, Switzerland, 13-14 May 2002, to review epidemiological and public health aspects of HCV infection, and the various prevention and control strategies that are currently in place. Based on the presentations and discussions, a number of specific recommendations were made, which should be considered in conjunction with previously published recommendations.

11 Review Hepatitis B vaccines. 2003

Shouval D. · Hadassah Medical Organization, Hadassah University Hospital, 91120 Jerusalem, Israel. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #14708681 No free full text.

Abstract: Yeast-derived hepatitis B vaccines, containing the small HBV envelope protein SHBAg, are immunogenic, safe and cost-effective in prevention of hepatitis B virus infection in neonates, children and adults. Newly developed pre-S/S hepatitis B vaccines may play a role in inducing fast and augmented seroconversion rates in special risk groups.

12 Review Hepatitis A booster vaccination: is there a need? 2003

Van Damme P, Banatvala J, Fay O, Iwarson S, McMahon B, Van Herck K, Shouval D, Bonanni P, Connor B, Cooksley G, Leroux-Roels G, Von Sonnenburg F, Anonymous00297. · Centre for the Evaluation of Vaccination, WHO Collaborating Centre for Control and Prevention of Viral Hepatitis, Unit of Epidemiology and Social Medicine, University of Antwerp, 2610 , Antwerp, Belgium. · Lancet. · Pubmed #14522539 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis A is one of the most common vaccine-preventable infectious diseases in the world. Effective vaccines against hepatitis A have been available since 1992, and they provide long-term immunity against the infection. However, there is no worldwide consensus on how long protection will last or whether there will be a need for hepatitis A virus (HAV) booster vaccinations in the future. In most countries, booster-vaccination policy is guided by manufacturers' recommendations, national authorities, or both. In June, 2002, a panel of international experts met to review the long-term immunogenicity and protection conferred by HAV vaccine in different population groups. Data have shown that after a full primary vaccination course, protective antibody amounts persist beyond 10 years in healthy individuals, and underlying immune memory provides protection far beyond the duration of anti-HAV antibodies. The group concluded that there is no evidence to lend support to HAV booster vaccination after a full primary vaccination course in a healthy individual. However, further investigations are needed before deciding if boosters can be omitted in special patient-groups.

13 Review Role of vaccination and adoptive immune transfer in persistent hepatitis B virus infection. 2001

Shouval D. · Liver Unit, Division of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, P.O. Box 12000, Jerusalem, Israel. · Indian J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11293182 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

14 Review Hepatitis B immune globulin to prevent hepatitis B virus graft reinfection following liver transplantation: a concise review. 2000

Shouval D, Samuel D. · Hôpital Paul Brousse, Centre Hepato Biliaire, Université Paris Sud, Villejuif Cedex, France. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #11093723 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

15 Review Posttransplantation: future therapies. 2000

Peters MG, Shouval D, Bonham A, Vierling JM, Lok AS. · University of California at San Francisco, USA. · Semin Liver Dis. · Pubmed #10895440 No free full text.

Abstract: Recent advances in prophylaxis and treatment of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection after liver transplantation have improved the outcome of liver transplantation for hepatitis B. Currently, the long-term use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIG) and/or nucleoside analogues are the only effective therapies to prevent or ameliorate HBV recurrence in liver transplant patients. However, they are very expensive, and breakthrough infections due to resistant HBV mutants are not infrequent. New strategies are being sought to decrease the risks of breakthrough infection and to increase the cost-effectiveness of liver transplantation for hepatitis B. Vaccination to prevent de novo infection is strongly recommended before transplantation, despite a decreased response in this immunosuppressed population. Adoptive transfer of immunity with such therapies as bone marrow or cytotoxic T lymphocyte transplants or xenotransplantation of an organ from a donor, which is not susceptible to infection by HBV may be effective in preventing or treating recurrent HBV posttransplantation. In addition, gene therapies and use of nucleoside and nucleotide analogues to disrupt various stages of the HBV life cycle may prevent or slow viral replication or assembly of the virus. Ultimately, the most effective therapy for the prevention of recurrent hepatitis B after liver transplantation will involve a combination of HBIG with one or more of the new antiviral agents.

16 Guideline Hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections in health care workers (HCWs): guidelines for prevention of transmission of HBV and HCV from HCW to patients. 2003

Gunson RN, Shouval D, Roggendorf M, Zaaijer H, Nicholas H, Holzmann H, de Schryver A, Reynders D, Connell J, Gerlich WH, Marinho RT, Tsantoulas D, Rigopoulou E, Rosenheim M, Valla D, Puro V, Struwe J, Tedder R, Aitken C, Alter M, Schalm SW, Carman WF, Anonymous00527. · West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, G12 OZA Glasgow, UK. · J Clin Virol. · Pubmed #12878084 No free full text.

Abstract: The transmission of viral hepatitis from health care workers (HCW) to patients is of worldwide concern. Since the introduction of serologic testing in the 1970s there have been over 45 reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from HCW to patients, which have resulted in more than 400 infected patients. In addition there are six published reports of transmissions of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from HCW to patients resulting in the infection of 14 patients. Additional HCV cases are known of in the US and UK, but unpublished. At present the guidelines for preventing HCW to patient transmission of viral hepatitis vary greatly between countries. It was our aim to reach a Europe-wide consensus on this issue. In order to do this, experts in blood-borne infection, from 16 countries, were questioned on their national protocols. The replies given by participating countries formed the basis of a discussion document. This paper was then discussed at a meeting with each of the participating countries in order to reach a Europe-wide consensus on the identification of infected HCWs, protection of susceptible HCWs, management and treatment options for the infected HCW. The results of that process are discussed and recommendations formed. The guidelines produced aim to reduce the risk of transmission from infected HCWs to patients. The document is designed to complement existing guidelines or form the basis for the development of new guidelines. This guidance is applicable to all HCWs who perform EPP, whether newly appointed or already in post.

17 Clinical Conference Relapse of hepatitis B in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who discontinued successful entecavir treatment: the case for continuous antiviral therapy. 2009

Shouval D, Lai CL, Chang TT, Cheinquer H, Martin P, Carosi G, Han S, Kaymakoglu S, Tamez R, Yang J, Tenney D, Brett-Smith H. · Liver Unit, Hadassah - Hebrew University Hospital, Ein-Kerem, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #19070393 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: To evaluate the off-treatment durability of response in HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Response' (HBV-DNA<0.7MEq/mL and ALT<1.25xULN) with entecavir at 48 weeks and the efficacy of entecavir in patients treated beyond one year. METHODS: Entecavir-treated and lamivudine-treated patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Response' were evaluated off-treatment for HBV-DNA<300copies/mL and ALT normalisation. Entecavir- and lamivudine-treated patients who achieved a protocol-defined 'Virological Response' (HBV-DNA<0.7MEq/mL but ALT1.25xULN) at 48 weeks, continued blinded treatment until they achieved Response or 96 weeks, whichever came first. RESULTS: Among 'Responders' who discontinued treatment after 48 weeks, 7/257 (3%) entecavir-treated and 10/201 (5%) lamivudine-treated patients sustained HBV-DNA below 300copies/mL at 24-weeks off-treatment. Among the 54 patients who continued blinded treatment in the second year, 7/26 (27%) entecavir-treated and 6/28 (21%) lamivudine-treated patients normalised ALT and 22/26 (85%) entecavir-treated and 16/28 (57%) lamivudine-treated patients maintained HBV-DNA<300copies/mL at end-of-dosing. The safety profiles of both drugs remained comparable through a second year of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of protocol-defined Responders relapsed after 1 year when treatment was discontinued. Treatment with entecavir beyond 1 year provided continued virological and biochemical benefit.

18 Clinical Conference Albinterferon alfa-2b dosed every two or four weeks in interferon-naïve patients with genotype 1 chronic hepatitis C. 2008

Zeuzem S, Yoshida EM, Benhamou Y, Pianko S, Bain VG, Shouval D, Flisiak R, Rehak V, Grigorescu M, Kaita K, Cronin PW, Pulkstenis E, Subramanian GM, McHutchison JG. · JW Goethe-University Hospital, Frankfurt, Germany. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #18666223 No free full text.

Abstract: The efficacy and safety of albinterferon alfa-2b (alb-IFN), a novel recombinant protein consisting of interferon alfa-2b genetically fused to human albumin, was evaluated in a phase 2b, open-label study of patients with genotype 1, chronic hepatitis C. In all, 458 IFN-alfa treatment-naïve patients were randomized to 48-week treatment with peginterferon alfa (PEG-IFNalpha)-2a 180 microg one time per week (qwk), or alb-IFN 900 or 1,200 microg once every two weeks (q2wk), or 1,200 microg once every four weeks (q4wk), administered subcutaneously, plus weight-based oral ribavirin 1,000 or 1,200 mg/day. Hepatitis C virus RNA was measured by real-time polymerase chain reaction (limit of detection: 10 IU/mL). The primary efficacy endpoint was sustained virologic response (hepatitis C virus RNA <10 IU/mL 24 weeks after the end of treatment). By intention-to-treat analysis, sustained virologic response rates were 58.5% (69/118) with alb-IFN 900 microg q2wk, 55.5% (61/110) with 1,200 microg q2wk, and 50.9% (59/116) with 1,200 microg q4wk, and 57.9% (66/114) with PEG-IFNalpha-2a (P = 0.64 for overall test). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 9.3% with alb-IFN 900 microg q2wk, 18.2% with 1,200 microg q2wk and 12.1% with 1,200 microg q4wk, and 6.1% with PEG-IFNalpha-2a (P = 0.04). Hematologic reductions were lowest in the q4wk group and comparable across other groups. At week 12, mean treatment-associated missed workdays were significantly lower with alb-IFN 900 mug q2wk versus PEG-IFNalpha-2a (1.1 versus 4.3 days; P = 0.006). CONCLUSION: Alb-IFN administered q2wk or q4wk may offer comparable efficacy, with an improved dosing schedule, compared with PEG-IFNalpha-2a.

19 Clinical Conference Entecavir versus lamivudine for patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B. free! 2006

Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, Chang TT, Cheinquer H, Goodman Z, DeHertogh D, Wilber R, Zink RC, Cross A, Colonno R, Fernandes L, Anonymous00171. · Queen Mary Hospital, Hong Kong, China. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #16525138 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Entecavir is a potent and selective antiviral agent that has demonstrated efficacy in phase 2 studies in patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-negative chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: In this phase 3, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 648 patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue to receive 0.5 mg of entecavir or 100 mg of lamivudine once daily for a minimum of 52 weeks. The primary efficacy end point was histologic improvement (a decrease by at least two points in the Knodell necroinflammatory score, without worsening of fibrosis). RESULTS: Histologic improvement after 48 weeks of treatment occurred in 208 of 296 patients in the entecavir group who had adequate baseline liver-biopsy specimens that could be evaluated (70 percent), as compared with 174 of 287 such patients in the lamivudine group (61 percent, P=0.01). More patients in the entecavir group than in the lamivudine group had undetectable serum hepatitis B virus (HBV) DNA levels according to a polymerase-chain-reaction assay (90 percent vs. 72 percent, P<0.001) and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels (78 percent vs. 71 percent, P=0.045). The mean reduction in serum HBV DNA levels from baseline to week 48 was greater with entecavir than with lamivudine (5.0 vs. 4.5 log [on a base-10 scale] copies per milliliter, P<0.001). There was no evidence of resistance to entecavir. Safety and adverse-event profiles were similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B who had not previously been treated with a nucleoside analogue, the rates of histologic improvement, virologic response, and normalization of alanine aminotransferase levels were significantly higher at 48 weeks with entecavir than with lamivudine. The safety profile of the two agents was similar, and there was no evidence of viral resistance to entecavir. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00035789.).

20 Clinical Conference Lamivudine treatment for chronic hepatitis B infection in children unresponsive to interferon. 2003

Hartman C, Berkowitz D, Shouval D, Eshach-Adiv O, Hino B, Rimon N, Satinger I, Kra-Oz T, Daudi N, Shamir R. · Division of Pediatric Gastroenterology and Nutrition, Meyer Children's Hospital of Haifa, Israel. · Pediatr Infect Dis J. · Pubmed #12634582 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Lamivudine is a potent inhibitor of hepatitis B virus (HBV) replication. This prospective open study reports the results of lamivudine treatment in children with chronic hepatitis B infection who did not respond to previous interferon treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Lamivudine, 3 mg/kg/day (maximum, 100 mg/day), was given for 52 weeks to 20 children and adolescents, ages 8.5 to 19 years, with chronic hepatitis B infection who had been treated with interferon 2 to 5 years earlier. We evaluated virologic and biochemical responses, the occurrence of YMDD mutants and adverse effects. RESULTS: All children were HBV DNA+, hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) /anti-hepatitis B e antibody- at start of treatment. At the end of 1 year, HBV DNA declined by 95% in all patients, and 8 of 18 (44%) had sustained undetectable HBV DNA by hybridization assay. Median pretreatment alanine aminotransferase (ALT) x1.5 upper limit of normal decreased to ALT x0.9 upper limit of normal after 1 year. One child became HBeAg-negative. YMDD mutants were detected in 11 of 17 (65%) children after 1 year of lamivudine treatment. Among children with YMDD mutant variants, 54% maintained normal ALT values and 45% had undetectable HBV DNA by hybridization assay. No adverse effects were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Children with chronic hepatitis B infection treated with lamivudine after failure of interferon therapy had decreased HBV replication and improved ALT values. However, lamivudine treatment resulted in an exceptionally high rate of lamivudine-resistant mutants and low HBeAg seroconversion rate.

21 Clinical Conference Lamivudine therapy for prevention of immunosuppressive-induced hepatitis B virus reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen carriers. free! 2002

Shibolet O, Ilan Y, Gillis S, Hubert A, Shouval D, Safadi R. · Liver Unit, Division of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. · Blood. · Pubmed #12091327 links to  free full text

Abstract: Viral reactivation in hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) carriers undergoing immunosuppressive therapy is well documented. To evaluate the role of lamivudine prophylaxis in Hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers treated with immunosuppression for nonhepatic disorders, we reviewed our experience between 1997 and 2000 at Hadassah University Hospital (Jerusalem, Israel). Controls were patients who were HBV carriers and who, between 1990 and 1995, were treated for hematological malignancies but were not treated with lamivudine. Eighteen HBsAg-positive patients were treated with immunosuppression. Fourteen were males, with a mean age of 48 years. Eleven patients had lymphoma; 2 had colonic adenocarcinoma; and 5 had cryoglobulinemia, enophthalmitis, vasculitis, malignant histocytosis, or ulcerative colitis. Fourteen patients were treated with chemotherapy, and 4 with prolonged high-dose corticosteroids. All patients were HBsAg-positive; 4 had hepatitis B e antigen, and 10 had HBV DNA by polymerase chain reaction. Lamivudine was administered to 13 patients in the treatment group 1 to 60 days (mean, 15 days) before immunosuppressive treatment and continued 0.5 to 24 months (mean, 7 months) following initiation of immunosuppression. Mean follow-up after lamivudine administration was 21 months. Three patients died of lymphoma complications and 10 (77%) survived. None of the patients had clinical or serological evidence of HBV reactivation during or after lamivudine prophylaxis. Of 6 patients who presented with liver function test disturbances, 5 improved during combined lamivudine and immunosuppression treatment. At the end of follow-up, HBV DNA became undetectable in 2 of 10 patients. In 2 patients, seroconversion from HBsAg to anti-HBs was observed. In contrast, 2 of 5 control patients had HBV reactivation. Lamivudine prophylaxis in HBsAg carriers receiving immunosuppressive therapy may prevent HBV reactivation and hepatic failure.

22 Clinical Conference Clinical evaluation (phase I) of a combination of two human monoclonal antibodies to HBV: safety and antiviral properties. 2002

Galun E, Eren R, Safadi R, Ashour Y, Terrault N, Keeffe EB, Matot E, Mizrachi S, Terkieltaub D, Zohar M, Lubin I, Gopher J, Shouval D, Dagan S. · Goldyne Savad Institute of Gene Therapy, Hadassah University Hospital, Jerusalem, Israel. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #11870383 No free full text.

Abstract: Treatment of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection with interferon alfa and lamivudine is characterized by lack of viral clearance, loss of response, or emergence of drug-resistant mutants. Thus, new and multiple drug approaches are needed. We have developed two fully human monoclonal antibodies, directed against different epitopes of hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) that bind to all major HBV subtypes. A phase I clinical study was conducted to evaluate the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of a mixture of these two monoclonal antibodies, HBV-AB(XTL). A total of 27 chronic HBV patients were enrolled. In part A of the study 15 patients in 5 cohorts received a single intravenous infusion of antibodies with doses ranging from 0.26 mg (260 IU) to 40 mg (40,000 IU). All patients completed 16 weeks of follow-up. In the second part of the study (part B), 12 patients in 4 cohorts received 4 weekly infusions of 10, 20, 40, or 80 mg each of HBV-AB(XTL) and were followed for 4 additional weeks. Administration of antibodies was well tolerated. Patients administered doses at an Ab:Ag molar ratio of 1:2 to 1:20 showed a rapid and significant decrease in HBsAg to undetectable levels, with a corresponding reduction of HBV-DNA levels. In part B, HBV-AB(XTL) induced a significant reduction in both HBsAg and HBV-DNA levels repeatedly after administration. In conclusion, these data suggest that HBV-AB(XTL) binds HBV particles and reduces serum viral titers and HBsAg levels. HBV-AB(XTL) could be combined with other monotherapies that are currently used to treat HBV carriers.

23 Clinical Conference Cell adhesion molecules and hyaluronic acid as markers of inflammation, fibrosis and response to antiviral therapy in chronic hepatitis C patients. free! 2001

Granot E, Shouval D, Ashur Y. · Pediatric Gastroenterology Unit, Pediatrics Department, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, PO. Box 12000, Jerusalem 91120, Israel. · Mediators Inflamm. · Pubmed #11759109 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Cell adhesion molecules (intracellular adhesion molecule-1 (ICAM-1), vascular cell adhesion molecule-1 (VCAM-1)) and hyaluronic acid, markers of inflammation and fibrosis were monitored in hepatitis C patients to determine whether changes in plasma levels, during antiviral treatment, can predict long-term response to therapy. METHODS: In 55 patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV), 33 treated with interferon (IFN) and 22 treated with IFN + ribavirin, sera was collected prior to treatment, at 3 + 6 months of therapy and 6 months post-treatment. Levels of ICAM-1, VCAM-1 and hyaluronic acid were correlated with alanine aminotransferase levels, HCV-RNA-polymerase chain reaction status and histological fibrosis scoring. RESULTS: A decrease in ICAM-1 levels at 3 and 6 months of therapy, compared with pretreatment levels, was observed in responders to IFN + ribavirin therapy but this decrease in ICAM-1 levels was not evident following cessation of treatment. Hyaluronic acid levels, in both treatment groups, did not differ significantly between responders and non-responders. Hyaluronic acid levels did correlate, significantly, with degree of fibrosis whereas VCAM-1 levels were marginally increased only in patients with moderate (grade III) fibrosis. CONCLUSIONS: Monitoring of VCAM-1 and hyaluronic acid, during antiviral therapy, does not differentiate between responders and non-responders. A decrease in ICAM-1 levels during IFN + ribavirin treatment is associated with response to therapy, and its efficacy in predicting long-term response should be further substantiated.

24 Clinical Conference Rapid seroprotection against hepatitis B following the first dose of a Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S vaccine. 2001

Shapira MY, Zeira E, Adler R, Shouval D. · Division of Medicine, Hadassah University Hospital, Hebrew University-Hadassah Medical School, Jerusalem, Israel. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #11211888 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Will immunization with an experimental Pre-S1/Pre-S2/S hepatitis B vaccine (Bio-Hep-B) induce faster seroprotection using fewer doses as compared with a yeast derived S vaccine (Engerix B). METHODS: Healthy volunteers, n = 36, mean age 23 y, randomized to receive 2 or 3 doses of both vaccines given months 0 and 6, or 0, 1 and 6. RESULTS: Following primary immunization, seroprotection occurred in 6, 39, 53 and 60% in the Bio-Hep-B group at weeks 1, 2, 3 and 4, compared with 0, 12, 18 and 12.5% in the Engerix-B vaccinees, respectively. Six months following injection of the first dose, seroprotection was 70 and 25% in Pre-S/S and S vaccinees respectively. Area under the curve in vaccinees of Bio-Hep-B; versus Engerix-B showed mean anti-HBs level of 365 +/- 166 and 85 +/- 48 mIU/ml x day respectively (P = 0.012). At month 7, 100% seroprotection was achieved in both groups while anti-HBs rose from 81 to 28,800 mIU/ml and from 12 to 923 mIU/ml in recipients of Bio-Hep-B and Engerix-B respectively (P < 0.025). CONCLUSIONS: Bio-Hep-B induces rapid seroprotection against hepatitis B in 60-70% of vaccinees, within 4-24 weeks after the first dose. Two instead of the conventional three doses of the Pre-S/S vaccine may be sufficient to induce adequate seroprotection.

25 Clinical Conference Interference of antibody production to hepatitis B surface antigen in a combination hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine. 1999

Frey S, Dagan R, Ashur Y, Chen XQ, Ibarra J, Kollaritsch H, Mazur MH, Poland GA, Reisinger K, Walter E, Van Damme P, Braconier JH, Uhnoo I, Wahl M, Blatter MM, Clements D, Greenberg D, Jacobson RM, Norrby SR, Rowe M, Shouval D, Simmons SS, van Hattum J, Wennerholm S, Gress JO. · Saint Louis University Health Sciences Center, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA. · J Infect Dis. · Pubmed #10558961 No free full text.

Abstract: A randomized trial comparing 3 manufacturing consistency lots of a combination hepatitis A/hepatitis B vaccine to each other and to hepatitis A vaccine and hepatitis B vaccine given separately and concurrently was done to evaluate safety, tolerability, and immunogenicity. Healthy volunteers >/=11 years of age were divided into 4 groups. Each of 3 groups received a separate consistency lot of the combination vaccine, and 1 group received separate but concurrent injections of hepatitis A and hepatitis B vaccines. Injections were given at weeks 0 and 24. The combination vaccine was generally well tolerated. The hepatitis A portion of the combination vaccine produced clinically acceptable high seropositivity rates 4 and 52 weeks after the first injection. The hepatitis B portion of the vaccine did not produce clinically acceptable seropositivity rates 4 weeks after the second injection. Lack of antibody production may be attributed, at least in part, to immunologic interference.


Next