Hepatitis: Schmitt HJ

Zepp F, Schmitt HJ, Cleerbout J, Verstraeten T, Schuerman L, Jacquet JM. · University Hospital, Department of Pediatrics, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstrasse 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. · Expert Rev Vaccines. · Pubmed #19485747 No free full text.

Abstract: Combination vaccines that include multiple antigens within one formulation are now widely accepted as an effective means of eliciting protection against several diseases at the same time. Owing to improvements in quality and convenient modes of administration, they have become part of routine pediatric practice. Hexavalent vaccines, including diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, hepatitis B, polio and Haemophilus influenzae type b antigens represent the latest advance in the development of combination vaccines. Over 8 years since its first licensure, this review looks at the immunogenicity, efficacy and safety profile of the only hexavalent pediatric vaccine currently in use--Infanrix hexa (diphtheria, tetanus, acellular pertusis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated poliovirus vaccine/Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccine [DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib]; GlaxoSmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium)--through published clinical trials and postmarketing surveillance data. These data show DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib to be highly immunogenic and well tolerated across a range of different primary and booster vaccination schedules, as well as when administered concomitantly with other licensed vaccines (e.g., pneumococcal conjugate vaccine). Additional issues surrounding the use of hexavalent vaccines are also reviewed.

Knuf M, Schmitt HJ, Wolter J, Schuerman L, Jacquet JM, Kieninger D, Siegrist CA, Zepp F. · Paediatric Immunology and Infectious Diseases, Children's Hospital, Johannes Gutenberg University of Mainz, Mainz, Germany. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #18410769 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Because young infants are at highest risk of pertussis complications, this study assessed whether neonatal acellular pertussis (aP) vaccination could provide earlier immunity. STUDY DESIGN: Neonates (n = 121) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either aP or hepatitis B vaccine (HBV) (controls) vaccine at birth, followed by vaccination with DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib at 2, 4 and 6 months. Immune responses were measured. Reactogenicity was assessed for 7 days after each dose. RESULTS: The aP birth dose was followed by few adverse events. Reactogenicity of subsequent vaccine doses did not differ between groups. Seven serious adverse events were reported from each group; none were related to the study vaccines. At 3 months of age, vaccination with aP at birth had induced significantly higher antibody responses to the 3 pertussis antigens compared with controls. At 7 months, geometric mean/concentrations of antibodies against pertussis antigens were similar in both groups, and all subjects had reached "seroprotective" antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus, and poliovirus types 1, 2, and 3. Geometric mean/concentrations of antibodies to haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and HBV were significantly lower in the aP group. CONCLUSIONS: Early neonatal immunization with aP was safe, well tolerated, and resulted in earlier antibody responses, seen after the first dose of a DTaP combination vaccine. Birth dose of aP did not induce immunologic tolerance to pertussis antigens but appear to dampen responses to Hib and HBV vaccines.

Schmitt HJ, Knuf M, Ortiz E, Sänger R, Uwamwezi MC, Kaufhold A. · Department of Pediatrics, Pediatric Infectious Diseases, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, Kiel, Germany. · J Pediatr. · Pubmed #10969252 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The aim of this open, multicenter, randomized trial was to evaluate the immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a candidate combined diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B virus-inactivated polio virus (DTaP-HBV-IPV) vaccine when given as either a mixed or as separate concomitant injections with Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) vaccine. STUDY DESIGN: A total of 359 subjects were randomized to receive either DTaP-HBV-IPV/Hib (mixed administration - 180 subjects) or DTaP-HBV-IPV + Hib (separate administration in opposite limbs - 179 subjects) at 2, 3, and 4 months of age. RESULTS: After vaccination, seroprotective antibody concentrations against diphtheria, tetanus, hepatitis B, and polio viruses and a high (> or = 97%) pertussis vaccine response were seen in almost all study participants. All subjects except one in the mixed administration group had postvaccination Hib anti-PRP antibody concentrations > or = 0.15 microg/mL. Of subjects in the mixed and separate group, 77.2% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 2. 62 microg/mL) and 88.6% (geometric mean antibody concentration, 4.45 microg/mL) had Hib anti-PRP concentrations > or = 1 microg/mL, respectively. The addition of the Hib component to the 5-component vaccine did not increase the incidence of local or general reactions. CONCLUSION: Both administrations of the candidate vaccine were found to be safe, immunogenic, and well tolerated. Although anti-PRP geometric mean antibody concentrations and the percent of subjects achieving the 1 microg/mL seroprotective level were lower after the mixed administration, they were in the range seen with monovalent Hib vaccines or with other DTaP-based/Hib combinations licensed in some European countries. Therefore both administrations have the potential to simplify childhood immunization.

Schmitt HJ, Steul KS, Borkowski A, Ceddia F, Ypma E, Knuf M. · Zentrum für Präventive Pädiatrie, Kinderklinik, Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz, Langenbeckstrabe 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany. · Vaccine. · Pubmed #18407386 No free full text.

Abstract: The immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a meningococcal serogroup C (MenC) conjugate vaccine given concomitantly with DTaP-IPV-HBV/Hib vaccine according to a two- or three-dose schedule in healthy infants was evaluated. At 1 month post-vaccination, 98% (two doses) and 100% (three doses) of subjects had serum bactericidal antibody using human complement assay (hSBA) titres > or =1:8; at 12 months of age > or =89% of subjects in each group remained seroprotected. Induction of immunological memory, as evaluated by administration of a meningococcal serogroup A/C polysaccharide vaccine challenge dose, was similar for both regimens and no interference was observed in the immune response to MenC or hepatitis B virus antigens. Reactogenicity was similar in each group. MenC conjugate vaccine given concomitantly with DTaP-IPV-HBV/Hib to healthy infants in the first year of life using a two-dose schedule is as safe and immunogenic as a three-dose regimen.

Schmitt HJ, Maechler G, Habermehl P, Knuf M, Saenger R, Begg N, Boutriau D. · Johannes-Gutenberg-Universität, Langenbeckstr. 1, 55101 Mainz, Germany. · Clin Vaccine Immunol. · Pubmed #17287313 links to  free full text

Abstract: We evaluated two formulations of a new combined Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib)-meningococcal serogroup C (MenC)-tetanus toxoid (TT) conjugated vaccine and two formulations of a new MenC-TT vaccine (trials 711202/001 and 711202/008; clinical trial register numbers NCT00135486 and NCT00135564 [www.ClinicalTrials.gov]). A total of 520 healthy infants were randomized to receive primary vaccination (at 2, 3, and 4 months) with either MenC-TT plus diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis (DTPa)-hepatitis B virus (HBV)-inactivated poliovirus (IPV)/Hib, Hib-MenC-TT plus DTPa-HBV-IPV, or MenC-CRM(197) plus DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib (control). At 12 to 15 months, subjects received a polysaccharide challenge with meningococcal polysaccharide C plus a DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib booster. Immune responses were assessed 1 month after dose 2, 1 month after dose 3, and prior to and 1 month after the booster. After primary vaccination, there was no difference between groups in seroprotection rates as measured by titers of serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) to MenC (> or = 1:8) or concentrations of anti-polyribosyl ribitol phosphate (PRP) antibody (> or = 0.15 microg/ml). Prior to the booster, there was no difference between groups in SBA seroprotection rates, whereas anti-PRP seroprotection rates were significantly higher after priming with Hib-MenC-TT. Booster doses induced large increases in SBA and anti-PRP antibodies in primed groups, indicating successful priming with induction of immune memory. Reactogenicity and safety were similar in all groups during the primary and booster phases. A novel combined Hib-MenC-TT conjugate vaccine induced MenC and Hib responses comparable to those induced by licensed monovalent vaccines. A Hib-MenC-TT conjugate vaccine provides vaccination against two major pathogens in a single injection and is a suitable candidate for use in primary or booster vaccination schedules.

Kalies H, Grote V, Verstraeten T, Hessel L, Schmitt HJ, von Kries R. · Department of Pediatric Epidemiology, Institute for Social Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine of Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Munich, Germany. · Pediatr Infect Dis J. · Pubmed #16732148 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In Germany, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib), polio and hepatitis B (HBV) vaccines have been combined with diphtheria, tetanus and acellular pertussis vaccines. We examined whether the use of combination vaccines has improved the timing of these vaccinations. METHODS: Vaccination information was obtained from representative nationwide telephone interviews about 2701 children born from 1996 through 2003 in Germany. We assessed up-to-date vaccination as the percentage of children vaccinated by 3, 5 and 15 months for the first dose, full primary series and full immunization, respectively. We compared results over periods when different combination vaccines were used. We also compared median age at first dose, full priming and full immunization for children receiving different types of combination vaccines. RESULTS: During the study period, monovalent vaccines were replaced by higher-valent combination vaccines. With the change from mono- to 4-, 5- and 6-valent vaccines, up-to-date vaccination increased for Hib, polio and HBV. Median age at immunization improved by 0.5 month for Hib, 0.4 month for polio and 0.9 month for HBV at the first dose and 2.2 months for Hib, 3.2 months for polio and 1.4 months for HBV at full immunization when comparing hexavalent with monovalent vaccines. Median age for 4-5-valent vaccines was intermediate. The difference between monovalent and 6-valent vaccines remained significant after stratifying/adjusting for the effect of birth cohorts. CONCLUSION: Combination vaccines are usually advocated for reducing the number of injections. In Germany, however, the use of combination vaccines has also significantly improved timeliness of immunizations.

Knuf M, Habermehl P, Cimino C, Petersen G, Schmitt HJ. · Pediatric Infectious Disease, Johannes Gutenberg University, Langenbeckstr. 1, D-55101 Mainz, Germany. · Vaccine. · Pubmed #16616973 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To evaluate immunogenicity, reactogenicity, and safety of a hexavalent combination vaccine diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio virus-Haemophilus influenzae type b (DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib) when coadministered with a 7-valent pneumococcal conjugate vaccine (PCV7). METHODS: Infants received either a hexavalent diphtheria-tetanus-acellular pertussis-hepatitis B-inactivated polio virus-H. influenzae type b vaccine concomitantly with PCV7 or DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib alone infants were vaccinated at 2, 3 and 4 months (primary immunization) and 12-15 months of age (booster dose). Local and systemic reactions and adverse events were monitored following each dose and compared between groups. Blood was obtained prior to dose 1, one month after dose 3, immediately prior to and 1 month following the booster dose to measure antibody responses to each of the antigens. RESULTS: Two hundred and fifty-three subjects (PCV7, 127; Control, 126) were enrolled. Antibody responses were compared in 226 subjects for the primary immunization and 212 for the booster dose (per-protocol (PP) population). Although there were some differences in geometric mean concentrations (GMCs) to the DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib antigens after the primary series, GMCs for all antigens after the booster dose were similar in both groups, except for diphtheria which was significantly higher in the PCV7 group (PCV7, 7.41 IU/mL; Control, 5.78 IU/mL). Reactogenicity and safety data were compared in 252 infants receiving primary immunization and 235 children receiving the booster dose. Site reactions were similar in both groups. Fever >or=38.0 degrees C following each vaccination was reported more frequently in the PCV7 group (28.3-50.0%) than in the Control group (15.6-33.6%) whereas fever >39.0 degrees C occurred only in a few cases and to the same extent in both groups (PCV7, 0.8-2.7%; Control, 1.6-4.1%). Only one reported serious adverse event was characterized as being related to the study vaccines: control subject was hospitalized with a fever. CONCLUSION: DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib and PCV7 were highly immunogenic, well-tolerated and safe when coadministered at 2, 3 and 4 months of age with a booster dose at 12-15 months of age. These results support the coadministration of PVC7 with DTPa-HBV-IPV/Hib as part of the routine immunization schedule for infants and children.

Kalies H, Grote V, Schmitt HJ, von Kries R. · Department of Paediatric Epidemiology, Institute of Social Paediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Heiglhofstrasse 63, 81377, Munich, Germany. · Eur J Pediatr. · Pubmed #16160869 No free full text.

Abstract: In Germany, a low coverage with hepatitis B and measles vaccines and a considerable delay in administration of all recommended vaccines were previously apparent. Whether there have been improvements and whether there are regional differences within Germany is not known. Using representative nationwide telephone interviews on 2,701 children born 1996-2003, we assessed vaccination coverage for the first dose or full primary series (2/3 doses, depending on vaccine used) at 24 months of age. The proportions vaccinated with the first dose, full priming and full immunisation (2/3 doses plus booster in the 2nd year of life) until the end of the recommended age (3, 5 and 15 months, respectively, for diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, polio, Haemophilus influenzae type b (Hib) and hepatitis B vaccines (DTPPolioHibHep), and 15 for the first measles, mumps and rubella dose (MMR) were used as indicators of compliance with national guidelines. Coverage for polio, Hib and hepatitis B vaccines increased, while coverage for the first MMR dose remained constantly low at about 70%. Vaccination coverage differed substantially among the German states and was highest for the new states. Compliance with national guidelines increased from 2.5% to 15% for the full primary DTPPolioHibHep series, from 16.2% to 44.7% for the first MMR dose and from 1.0% to 19.3% for the full immunisation with all recommended vaccines (DTPPolioHibHepMMR). CONCLUSION: Vaccination coverage at 24 months and compliance with national guidelines has improved for most vaccines in Germany. However, improving coverage for measles, mumps, rubella and eliminating the regional disparities remain a major challenge for the public health sector.