Hepatitis: Schalm SW

Schalm SW. · No affiliation provided · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #11592606 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Buster EH, Schalm SW, Janssen HL. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #19187869 No free full text.

Abstract: The practising clinician is currently faced with a number of effective treatment options for chronic hepatitis B, including two formulations of interferon (standard IFN and pegylated IFN) and five nucleos(t)ide analogues (lamivudine, adefovir, entecavir, telbivudine and tenofovir). Treatment strategies can be divided into those aiming for sustained response after discontinuation of therapy and those that need to be maintained by prolonged antiviral therapy. Sustained response is particularly achieved with interferon-based therapy, while treatment-maintained response can be achieved with long-term nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy in the majority of patients. Of currently available drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, PEG-IFN seems to result in the highest rate of off-treatment sustained response after a 1-year course of therapy. Sustained transition to the immune-control phase (inactive HBsAg carrier state) can be achieved in 30-35% of HBeAg-positive patients and 20-25% of HBeAg-negative patients. Loss of HBsAg has been observed in 11% of both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients after 3-4 years. Since hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype is an important predictor of response to PEG-IFN, determination of HBV genotype is essential in patients in whom sustained off-treatment response is pursued. Aiming for sustained response is of particular interest because many HBV-infected patients are in need of antiviral therapy at a young age and may otherwise require indefinite antiviral therapy.

de Bruijne J, Buster EH, Gelderblom HC, Brouwer JT, de Knegt RJ, van Erpecum KJ, Schalm SW, Bakker CM, Zaaijer HL, Janssen HL, Reesink HW, Anonymous00041. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Centre Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · Neth J Med. · Pubmed #18663263 links to  free full text

Abstract: The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of practical guidelines in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection. This includes recommendations for the initial evaluation of patients, the choice and duration of antiviral therapy and the follow-up after antiviral therapy. Hepatitis C is a slowly progressive disease. The initial evaluation of chronically HCV-infected patients should include liver biochemistry testing, virological testing and abdominal ultrasound imaging. Liver biopsy is no longer a routine procedure. Antiviral treatment should be considered for all HCV-infected patients. Current antiviral treatment is a long-term process and is associated with substantial side effects. When deciding whether to start treatment or not, the chance of successful treatment (80% with hepatitis C genotype 2 and 3 and 50% with hepatitis C genotype 1 and 4), the fibrosis stage, the expected side effects and the compliance of the patient should be taken into consideration. In the absence of significant fibrosis and necroinflammation in liver biopsy, postponing treatment is an option. Current antiviral treatment is contraindicated in patients with Child-Pugh-class B or C cirrhosis. The possibility of a liver transplantation should be investigated in these patients. Significant comorbidity with a limited life expectancy is an absolute contraindication for antiviral treatment Treatment of chronic hepatitis C consists of administration of peginterferon and ribavirin for 24 or 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4 are treated for 48 weeks. Patients with hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3 are treated for 24 weeks. In patients with undetectable HCV RNA after four weeks (28 days) of treatment, a shorter treatment is equally effective (12 to 16 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 2 or 3; 24 weeks for hepatitis C genotype 1 or 4). Outpatient clinic visits are recommended at the start and after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment, and thereafter every four to six weeks until the end of treatment. It is recommended to stop treatment if the HCV RNA level has not decreased by at least 2 log10 IU/ml (c/ml) after 12 weeks of treatment or when HCV RNA is still detectable after 24 weeks of treatment. The recommended frequency of outpatient clinic visits for patients who are not being treated is once every six months in patients with cirrhosis, otherwise every 12 months. It is expected that new anti-HCV-medication (STAT-C, specifically targeted antiviral therapy for HCV) will become available in the near future. Therefore treatment of chronic HCV infection will probably be more effective in the future.

Buster EH, van Erpecum KJ, Schalm SW, Zaaijer HL, Brouwer JT, Gelderblom HC, de Knegt RJ, Minke Bakker C, Reesink HW, Janssen HL, Anonymous00062. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Centre Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · Neth J Med. · Pubmed #18663260 links to  free full text

Abstract: The development of this guideline was initiated and coordinated by the Netherlands Association of Gastroenterologists and Hepatologists (Nederlandse Vereniging van Maag-Darm-Leverartsen). The aim is the establishment of national standards in the evaluation and antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. This includes recommendations on the initial evaluation of patients, choice and duration of antiviral therapy, follow-up after antiviral therapy and monitoring of patients not currently requiring antiviral therapy. The initial evaluation of chronic HBV-infected patients should include testing of liver biochemistry, virus serology and abdominal imaging. In patients without cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended for those with a serum HBV DNA of at least 1.0 x 105 c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) in combination with: a) elevation of serum alanine aminotransferase (ALAT) level above twice the upper limit of normal during at least three months, and/or b) histological evidence of porto-portal septa or interface hepatitis on liver histology. In patients with cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1.0 x 10(4)c/ml (>or=2.0 x 10(3) IU/ml) or higher, independent of ALAT levels or histological findings. If the patient has decompensated cirrhosis, antiviral treatment is recommended if serum HBV DNA is 1000 c/ml (>or=200 IU/ml) or higher. Patients who do not have an indication for antiviral treatment should be monitored because there is a risk of (re)activation of disease activity. Monitoring every three to six months is recommended for HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients with high viraemia (HBV DNA >or=1.0 x 10(5) c/ml or >or=2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) and normal ALAT levels. For patients with serum HBV DNA below 1.0 x 10(5) c/ml (<2.0 x 10(4) IU/ml) the recommended frequency of monitoring is every three to six months for HBeAg-positive patients and every six to 12 months for HBeAg-negative patients. Peginterferon (PEG-IF N) therapy should be considered as initial therapy in both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients without contraindications for treatment with this drug because of the higher chance of achieving sustained response compared with nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. In patients starting nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy, the use of lamivudine is not preferred if long-term antiviral treatment is expected due to the high risk of antiviral resistance against this drug. Of the currently licensed nucleos(t)ide analogues, entecavir has the lowest risk of antiviral resistance (compared with lamivudine, adefovir and telbivudine), while suppression of viral replication seems most profound with either entecavir or telbivudine. The recommended duration of treatment with PEG-IF N is one year for both HBeAg-positive and HBeAg-negative patients. In HBeAg-positive patents, nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy should at least be continued until HBeAg seroconversion and a decline in HBV DNA to below 400 c/ml (80 IU/ml) has been achieved and maintained for six months during therapy. Whether nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy can be safely discontinued in HBeAg-negative patients is unknown; usually prolonged or indefinite antiviral treatment is necessary. Patients receiving PEG-IF N should be monitored once a month, while three monthly monitoring suffices for those receiving nucleos(t)ide analogues. Genotypic analysis of the HBV polymerase is indicated if an increase in serum HBV DNA of at least 1 log(10) c/ml (IU/ml) compared with the nadir value is observed during nucleos(t)ide analogue therapy. Antiviral therapy should be changed as soon as possible in case of confirmed genotypic resistance. Adding a second antiviral agent seems beneficial over switching to another agent. With the availability of multiple new antiviral drugs for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B, effective treatment is now possible for more patients and for longer periods. However, the complexity of HBV therapy has also increased. Nowadays, virtually all chronic HBV-infected patients can be effectively managed, either by inducing sustained off-treatment response or by maintaining an on-treatment response.

Idris BI, Brosa M, Richardus JH, Esteban R, Schalm SW, Buti M. · Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #18334876 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection can lead to fatal complications and death. Only a relatively small proportion of patients actually receive medication, and the majority requires long-term antiviral therapy that can result in the emergence of resistant strains of HBV. The study aimed to estimate the future burden of chronic hepatitis B in Spain over the next 20 years, the impact of current lamivudine treatment and the emergence of drug-resistant HBV. METHODS: We constructed a hypothetical cohort of people with active chronic HBV infection in Spain in 2005, and 'followed' the cohort for 20 years. The cohort was stratified with respect to factors that affect prognosis (i.e. hepatitis B e-antigen and histology-defined status). To estimate the burden, Markov mathematical simulation was performed based on three scenarios: natural history, treatment with antiviral drug (lamivudine) and treatment with a hypothetical drug with identical profiles to lamivudine but to which there is no resistance. RESULTS: We estimated that in 2005 there were around 111,000 individuals suffering from active chronic HBV infection. If the cohort is not treated, by the year 2025 there will be about 60,000 events of morbidity and 40,000 cases of liver-related deaths, with 1.84 billion euro expected to be consumed in providing care for the cohort. Treating 35% of the cohort with lamivudine will reduce the morbidity and mortality by 19 and 15%, respectively; whereas the hypothetical drug will reduce the morbidity and mortality by 27 and 24%. The cumulative cost savings resulting from the use of lamivudine and the hypothetical drug, respectively, are 160 and 300 million euro. Antiviral resistance accounts for a reduction of about one-third in the potential benefit of treatment, and almost a half of the potential cost saving. CONCLUSION: Chronic hepatitis B will pose a great burden in the future if the individuals with active disease are left untreated. Effective antiviral therapy and treatment coverage have substantial impact in reducing the future burden; however, antiviral resistance decreases treatment benefit considerably.

Bezemer G, Schalm SW, van Gool AR, de Knegt RJ. · Erasmus MC-Centrum, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #17373393 No free full text.

Abstract: Since hepatitis C can be treated more and more successfully, treatment should be considered in every patient. In some of the patients infected by viral genotype I, the duration of treatment can be shortened: 24 weeks instead of 48 weeks. Maintaining the optimal dosage of ribavirin and peginterferon alpha is of great importance for successful treatment. For this purpose, new guidelines are proposed with reference to the haematological side effects, recommending more restraint with the reduction of the dosage and treatment in case of complaints. Treatment with peginterferon alpha frequently causes psychiatric problems, particularly depressive symptoms that are sometimes severe. Adequate treatment and support, including the use of antidepressants, are necessary in such cases and are often effective.

van der Eijk AA, de Man RA, Niesters HG, Schalm SW, Zaaijer HL. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #16364075 No free full text.

Abstract: Different guidelines exist for the management of hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health care workers (HCWs). Various HBV DNA levels are used as a cutoff level to determine whether an HBV-infected HCW is allowed to perform exposure-prone procedures (EPPs) or not. In this paper we discuss the factors that determine HBV DNA levels and the implications of different HBV DNA cutoff levels for EPP performing HCWs. If the level of HBV DNA in the serum of HCWs is used to determine acceptability for the conduct of EPPs, it is necessary to take into account the variability in time of HBV DNA levels in HBV carriers and the reliability and reproducibility of the molecular diagnostic test involved. The issue of standardization has to be addressed, before a universal, maximum level of viraemia for EPP performing HCWs can be introduced.

Buster EH, van der Eijk AA, de Man RA, Schalm SW. · Dept. of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. · Pubmed #15696849 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health-care workers (HCWs) have infected patients during medical procedures. In many countries HBV-infected HCWs are restricted in performing exposure prone procedures based on either HBeAg status or serum HBV DNA level. To prevent loss of skilled HCWs and to minimize transmission risk, highly viraemic HCWs can be offered antiviral therapy. Nucleoside analogues have proven to be effective in reducing transmission of HIV and HBV in the setting of vertical mother-to-infant transmission. Following the same rationale, suppression of viral load in HBV-infected HCWs could minimize the risk of doctor-to-patient transmission to such an extent that job modifications are no longer indicated. To limit the risk of drug resistance, the use of combination therapy is advocated. We describe two chronic HBV-infected HCWs treated with antiviral therapy, eventually leading to well-tolerated and highly effective combination therapy with lamivudine and tenofovir, with continuation of medical practice.

Veldt BJ, Saracco G, Boyer N, Cammà C, Bellobuono A, Hopf U, Castillo I, Weiland O, Nevens F, Hansen BE, Schalm SW. · Erasmus MC, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Room CA 326, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Gut. · Pubmed #15361504 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The key end point for treatment efficacy in chronic hepatitis C is absence of detectable virus at six months after treatment. However, the incidence of clinical events during long term follow up of patients with sustained virological response is still poorly documented and may differ between the Eastern and Western world. AIMS: To assess clinical end points during long term follow up of European patients with a sustained virological response to interferon monotherapy. METHODS: Meta-analysis of individual patient data from eight European protocolled follow up studies of interferon treatment for chronic hepatitis C. RESULTS: A total of 286 sustained virological responders and 50 biochemical responders (detectable virus but normal alanine aminotransferase levels) were followed up for 59 months. Fifteen sustained virological responders (5.2%) had cirrhosis before treatment and 112 (39%) had genotype 1. The late virological relapse rate after five years of follow up was 4.7% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.0-7.4) among sustained virological responders; all late relapses occurred within four years after treatment. Among sustained virological responders, the rate of decompensation after five years of follow up was 1.0% (95% CI 0.0-2.3) and none developed hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Survival was comparable with the general population, matched for age and sex, the standard mortality ratio being 1.4 (95% CI 0.3-2.5). Clinical outcome of patients with cirrhosis was similar to other sustained virological responders. For biochemical responders, the rates of development of decompensation and HCC during long term follow up were 9.1% (95% CI 0.5-17.7) and 7.1% (95% CI 0-15.0), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Five year survival of European sustained virological responders was similar to the overall population, matched for age and sex. No HCCs were detected during long term follow up.

Vrolijk JM, de Knegt RJ, Veldt BJ, Orlent H, Schalm SW. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology (Ca326), Erasmus Medical Centre, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · Neth J Med. · Pubmed #15209471 links to  free full text

Abstract: The treatment of chronic hepatitis C has made remarkable progress over the past two decades. For interferon-alpha monotherapy, sustained virological response rates were between 2 and 9% in genotype 1 and between 16 and 23% in genotypes 2 and 3. By adjusting treatment duration up to 48 weeks for genotype 1 and combining regular interferon-alpha with ribavirin, sustained response rates could be improved to 28 to 31% in genotype 1 and around 65% in genotypes 2 and 3. Attempts to further increase efficacy included the addition of amantadine without conclusive evidence up till now. With the recent introduction of long-acting pegylated interferon-alpha in combination with ribavirin, sustained virological response rates of 8o% can be obtained in genotypes 2 and 3. However, sustained virological response rates for patients with either genotype 1, nonresponse to prior treatment, cirrhosis or a combination of these characteristics are still less than 50%. In view of results with daily high-dose interferon-alpha induction in combination with prolongation of treatment duration up to 18 months, such patients might benefit from induction and prolonged PEG-IFN-alpha treatment and should be treated in an experimental setting.

Orlent H, Vrolijk JM, Veldt BJ, Schalm SW. · Dept. of Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Scand J Gastroenterol Suppl. · Pubmed #14743892 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The current NIH and French consensus provide physicians with clear guidelines on how to care best for patients with hepatitis C. METHODS: Review and discussion. RESULTS: Confirming the diagnosis and guiding the initial investigations have become straightforward. The standard treatment and its monitoring have been described in many publications. Recommending therapy to patients with moderate fibrosis has been the custom since the 1999 EASL guidelines. The 2002 guidelines have widened the spectrum of patients with chronic hepatitis C that should be considered for antiviral therapy. Patient categories not previously considered for therapy, such as alcoholics, intravenous drug users, prison inmates and social subgroups of society that lack adequate medical care, can now be offered therapy provided they are well supported in specific programmes. Liver physicians have learned throughout the years to manage side effects successfully and encourage patient adherence. This is reflected in the higher sustained viral response rates with standard interferon and ribavirin reported in the pegylated interferon registration trials compared with the interferon-ribavirin trials. Reducing the dose rather than stopping therapy is the key issue. Antidepressive agents have their place in the management of mood disorders prior to or during therapy. CONCLUSION: Every patient with chronic hepatitis C should be considered for antiviral therapy. It is probably best for a patient to be treated by a physician who has experience in managing possible side effects and in coaching a patient through his 6 or 12 months of treatment.

Schalm SW. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Room Ca 326, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #14708694 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Buster EH, van der Eijk AA, Schalm SW. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Antiviral Res. · Pubmed #14638402 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B virus (HBV)-infected health care workers (HCWs) can infect patients undergoing exposure prone procedures. Until now reviews have focused on the problem of the HBeAg-positive HCWs. After transmission of HBV by HBeAg-negative surgeons, the focus of Public Health Policy in the UK and the Netherlands has changed from HBeAg status to serum HBV DNA level. Viral load and the volume of blood transmitted determine the transmission risk of HBV. We have estimated the number of infectious particles transmitted by needlesticks, in comparison with those attributed in maternal-fetal transfusion. The blood volume transmitted by needlestick is roughly 1-30% of that of delivery. As vertical transmission with maternal HBV DNA levels below 10(7) g Eq./ml is rarely documented, HBV transmission by needlesticks is, according to our assumptions, unlikely to occur with HBV DNA levels below 10(7) g Eq./ml. Sera of transmitting HCWs contained HBV DNA levels between 5.0 x 10(9) and 6.35 x 10(4) g Eq./ml. Interpretation of these levels is hampered as the sera were taken at least 3 months after transmission. To prevent both loss of expertise and nosocomial infection, highly viremic HCWs can be offered antiviral therapy. Lamivudine and alpha-interferon can now be complemented with adefovir, tenofovir and entecavir to provide effective new therapies for chronic HBV-infected HCWs.

Schalm SW, Buster EH. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · J Clin Virol. · Pubmed #12878085 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Orlent H, Vrolijk JM, de Man RA, Schalm SW. · Erasmus Medisch Centrum, afd. Maag-, Darm- en Leverziekten, Postbus 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #12848055 No free full text.

Abstract: The recent advances in the antiviral therapy of hepatitis C have significantly lowered the threshold for offering such therapy to patients. Sustained virological response rates of 42-46% are achieved after 48 weeks of combination therapy with peginterferon alpha and ribavirin in patients with genotype 1 infection. In patients with a genotype 2 or 3 infection, 24 weeks of combination therapy leads to a sustained response rate of almost 80%. The U.S. National Institutes of Health consensus states that every patient with hepatitis C should be considered for antiviral therapy. Identification of the patients, selection for therapy, the provision of good information, guidance of the patient during therapy and a successful management of side effects lead to better treatment compliance and are of paramount importance in obtaining maximal therapeutic efficacy. Supportive guidance during substance abuse withdrawal programmes and the adequate use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors should be part of these measures.

Willems M, Metselaar HJ, Tilanus HW, Schalm SW, de Man RA. · Department of Gastroenterology, University Hospital Dijkzigt, P.O. Box 2040, 3000 Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Transpl Int. · Pubmed #11935162 No free full text.

Abstract: End-stage liver disease caused by chronic hepatitis C viral infection is one of the major indications for liver transplantation. However, evidence for ongoing viral replication can already be found days after surgery and may lead sequentially to lobular hepatitis, chronic active hepatitis, fibrosis and liver cirrhosis. In some patients, this evolution is remarkably fast, most probably enhanced by the immunosuppressive therapy. A minority of patients develop a clinical picture of progressive cholestatic liver disease with histological signs of chronic rejection, which may necessitate retransplantation. While the 1- and 5-year survival rates for all patients transplanted because of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-induced liver cirrhosis are satisfactory, severe complications of disease recurrence are nonetheless expected during the first and second decade after liver transplantation. Larger and preferably randomized studies are needed to investigate whether combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin, preferably initiated as soon as possible after liver transplantation, prevents the fast evolution to cirrhosis without the appearance of chronic rejection and the expected complications of recurrent end-stage HCV-induced liver disease. The final goal should be the inhibition of viral replication even before liver transplantation, but other antiviral strategies should probably be used to attain this goal in patients with decompensated cirrhosis. Although the recurrence of a hepatitis C infection and concomitant disease in the liver graft may cause substantial morbidity, end-stage liver disease and liver failure caused by a chronic hepatitis C infection remain good indications for liver transplantation.

van Nunen AB, Janssen HL, Wolters LM, Niesters HG, de Man RA, Schalm SW. · Department of Hepatogastroenterology, Erasmus University Hospital Rotterdam, PO Box 2040, 3000 CA Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Antiviral Res. · Pubmed #11672823 No free full text.

Abstract: For the treatment of chronic hepatitis B (CHB) two drugs have been licensed world-wide: interferon-alpha (IFN) and lamivudine. Both drugs significantly increase the hepatitis B e-antigen (HBeAg) seroconversion rate, but a sustained treatment response occurs in less than 40% of patients. To explore whether there is an additional benefit of combining these two drugs, we reviewed the literature on lamivudine-IFN combination therapy in comparison to the two monotherapies in compensated, HBeAg-positive, CHB patients. We focussed on two clinically relevant outcome measures: HBeAg seroconversion, and change in liver histology. Candidates for lamivudine-IFN combination therapy were, previously untreated, patients with moderately elevated alanine aminotransferase (ALT). Such regimen should still be considered experimental. Viral kinetics may provide insight into how long therapy should be continued; prolongation of therapy to 52 weeks currently appears a reasonable approach. According to principles of anti-viral therapy today, simultaneously dosing of both drugs is to be preferred, since rapid maximal virus suppression is thought to be essential to prevent drug resistance and enhance seroconversion. From an immunological point of view, pre-treatment with lamivudine or IFN may alter the virus-host balance and set the stage for the other drug to enhance the effect of treatment. Further clinical research on lamivudine-IFN combination therapy appears warranted.

Schalm SW, Wolters LM, van Nunen AB, Niesters HG, de Man RA. · Dept. of Hepatogastroenterology & Virology, University Hospital Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Acta Gastroenterol Belg. · Pubmed #10925461 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Schalm SW, van Wijngaarden JK. · Department of Hepatogastroenterology, University Hospital Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #10886532 No free full text.

Abstract: It is well-established that hepatitis B may be transmitted from surgeons to their patients. Clear strategies are needed to reduce the risk of transmission whilst not discriminating unnecessarily against surgeons who may pose no risks to their patients. This review outlines the current position and provides a blueprint for action that may reduce the risks to patients whilst minimizing the impact on practising surgeons.

Schalm SW, Brouwer JT, Bekkering FC, van Rossum TG. · Department of Hepatology & Gastroenterology, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #10622584 No free full text.

Abstract: There is solid evidence that retreatment of non-responders with standard regimens of interferon monotherapy is of no clinical value. On the other hand, combination therapy with interferon and ribavirin now produces sustained response rates in non-responders similar to those of interferon monotherapy in untreated patients. Consequently, retreatment of non-responders with the combination of interferon-ribavirin appears to be a valid treatment option. The efficacy of retreatment with the interferon-ribavirin combination can probably be increased by modifying the first weeks of interferon therapy from standard (3 MU tiw) to induction (10 MU daily), and by extending the treatment period to 12 months. In the next few years, the additive value of amantadine to interferon or to interferon-ribavirin combination in inducing sustained viral clearance should be explored. For the many patients who still do not respond with viral clearance despite these new approaches, the goal of therapy might be shifted towards persistent ALT normalization in order to reduce the progression of liver disease. Drugs that can normalize serum ALT such as interferon, ursodeoxycholic acid, ribavirin and glycyrrhizin should be evaluated for this objective.

de Man RA, Honkoop P, Janssen HL, Schalm SW. · Academisch Ziekenhuis Rotterdam-Dijkzigt, afd. Maag-, Darm- en Leverziekten. · Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. · Pubmed #10526598 No free full text.

Abstract: The possibilities for antiviral treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infections have been in flux for the last few years. Apart from interferon alpha, oral nucleoside analogues are given a place. The treatment focuses on the group of patients with active virus multiplication (hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) and HBV DNA are demonstrable), abnormal liver enzyme values and histologically demonstrated inflammatory activity in the liver. For the individual patient the pros and cons of protracted virus inhibition should be weighted by means of an orally administered nucleoside analogue such as lamivudine, immunostimulation with injections of interferon alpha or a combination of these two.

Gunson RN, Shouval D, Roggendorf M, Zaaijer H, Nicholas H, Holzmann H, de Schryver A, Reynders D, Connell J, Gerlich WH, Marinho RT, Tsantoulas D, Rigopoulou E, Rosenheim M, Valla D, Puro V, Struwe J, Tedder R, Aitken C, Alter M, Schalm SW, Carman WF, Anonymous00527. · West of Scotland Specialist Virology Centre, Gartnavel General Hospital, 1053 Great Western Road, G12 OZA Glasgow, UK. · J Clin Virol. · Pubmed #12878084 No free full text.

Abstract: The transmission of viral hepatitis from health care workers (HCW) to patients is of worldwide concern. Since the introduction of serologic testing in the 1970s there have been over 45 reports of hepatitis B virus (HBV) transmission from HCW to patients, which have resulted in more than 400 infected patients. In addition there are six published reports of transmissions of hepatitis C virus (HCV) from HCW to patients resulting in the infection of 14 patients. Additional HCV cases are known of in the US and UK, but unpublished. At present the guidelines for preventing HCW to patient transmission of viral hepatitis vary greatly between countries. It was our aim to reach a Europe-wide consensus on this issue. In order to do this, experts in blood-borne infection, from 16 countries, were questioned on their national protocols. The replies given by participating countries formed the basis of a discussion document. This paper was then discussed at a meeting with each of the participating countries in order to reach a Europe-wide consensus on the identification of infected HCWs, protection of susceptible HCWs, management and treatment options for the infected HCW. The results of that process are discussed and recommendations formed. The guidelines produced aim to reduce the risk of transmission from infected HCWs to patients. The document is designed to complement existing guidelines or form the basis for the development of new guidelines. This guidance is applicable to all HCWs who perform EPP, whether newly appointed or already in post.

Pilli M, Zerbini A, Penna A, Orlandini A, Lukasiewicz E, Pawlotsky JM, Zeuzem S, Schalm SW, von Wagner M, Germanidis G, Lurie Y, Esteban JI, Haagmans BL, Hezode C, Lagging M, Negro F, Homburger Y, Neumann AU, Ferrari C, Missale G, Anonymous00057. · Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Parma, Parma, Italy. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #17919489 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: The second slope of viral decline induced by interferon treatment has been suggested to be influenced mainly by the hepatitis C virus (HCV)-specific T-cell response; however, this hypothesis needs to be validated by results derived from experimental studies. METHODS: To address this issue, the HCV-specific T-cell response of 32 genotype-1-infected patients of the 270 patients enrolled in the dynamically individualized treatment of hepatitis C infection and correlates of viral/host dynamics phase III, open-label, randomized, multicenter trial was studied in relation to viral kinetics and treatment outcome. RESULTS: Greater proliferative responses by HCV-specific CD8 cells were found before treatment in patients with a fast viral decline and with a sustained viral response. However, no significant improvement of HCV-specific CD8 responses was observed in the first weeks of therapy in both rapid viral responder and non-rapid viral responder patients. A mild enhancement of proliferative T-cell responses and a partial restoration of the cytotoxic T-cell potential was expressed only late during treatment, likely favored by HCV clearance. CONCLUSIONS: Early restoration of an efficient T-cell response does not seem to be an essential requirement for a rapid viral decline in the first weeks of treatment. However, patients presenting a better HCV-specific CD8 cell proliferative potential at baseline are more likely to present a rapid and sustained viral response. Therefore, future treatment protocols should consider the development of strategies aimed at improving HCV-specific T-cell responses.

Sprengers D, van der Molen RG, Binda R, Kusters JG, de Man RA, Niesters HG, Schalm SW, Janssen HL. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Erasmus MC University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #17875010 No free full text.

Abstract: Only in a minority of patients with chronic hepatitis B (CHB) will treatment with interferon (IFN)-alpha or nucleoside analogues lead to sustained virological response. In vivo immunization (IVI) following virus suppression aims to optimize conditions for an effective immune response: following rapid and profound virus suppression by interferon-lamivudine combination therapy, lamivudine is withdrawn intermittently during continued interferon therapy. It is thought that withdrawal of lamivudine will lead to increased viral replication and increased antigen expression with subsequent immune stimulation. The aim of this prospective pilot study was to evaluate IVI as a therapeutic approach for CHB. Fourteen HBeAg-positive CHB patients were treated for 42 weeks with a combination of pegylated interferon-alpha 2b and lamivudine. After 12 weeks of combination therapy lamivudine was withdrawn intermittently for three consecutive periods of 4 weeks until it was permanently stopped on week 36. At the end of follow-up (week 52) all patients had remained HBeAg positive and the median viral load was similar to baseline. During the initial 12 weeks of treatment, there was a reduction of both the hepatitis B virus (HBV)-specific proliferation capacity of Th-cells and the frequencies of IFNgamma-producing cells. During the lamivudine interruption-cycle there was an inverse relation between the increase of HBV-DNA, and the decrease in proliferation capacity and frequency of IFN-gamma-producing cells. The intrahepatic fraction of CD8(+) T-cells increased during lamivudine withdrawal. In conclusion, IVI was able to transiently stimulate the HBV-specific immune responsiveness of T-cells, but the magnitude of the response was insufficient to cause a beneficial virological effect.

Westin J, Lagging M, Dhillon AP, Norkrans G, Romero AI, Pawlotsky JM, Zeuzem S, Schalm SW, Verheij-Hart E, Negro F, Missale G, Neumann AU, Hellstrand K, Anonymous00206. · Department of Infectious Diseases, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #17212641 No free full text.

Abstract: Liver steatosis is highly prevalent in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection, especially in patients infected with genotype 3 virus, but its significance for the outcome of antiviral treatment is not fully understood. We have monitored steatosis in liver biopsies from 231 patients with chronic HCV infection who received pegylated recombinant interferon-alpha and ribavirin in a phase III study (DITTO trial). The degree of steatosis, along with relevant metabolic parameters, was correlated with the early disappearance of virus and with the final outcome of treatment. Our data suggest that the presence of steatosis impairs the early reduction of viral load during treatment in patients infected with HCV genotype 3 and non-3. Steatosis negatively affected the final outcome of treatment mainly in patients infected with HCV genotype non-3 virus. Based on these findings, we propose that interventions aiming at reducing hepatic steatosis prior to the onset of antiviral therapy may be of benefit to patients infected with HCV of the non-3 genotypes. Patients infected with genotype 3, on the other hand, should be offered early antiviral treatment.