Hepatitis: Ruiz P

Barril G, González Parra E, Alcázar R, Arenas D, Campistol JM, Caramelo C, Carrasco M, Carreño V, Espinosa M, García Valdecasas J, Górriz JL, López MD, Martín L, Ruiz P, Terruel JL, Anonymous00170. · Nefrólogo Hosp. Universitario de La Princesa, Madrid. · Nefrologia. · Pubmed #15085792 No free full text.

Abstract: The viric infections influence morbi-mortality in Chronic kidney Disease patients in hemodialysis therapy and can affect to the Staff of the Units. The guides considered the most relevant virus at the present moment: C Virus, B Virus and HIV. To prevent horizontal nosocomial transmission is necessary the observance always the universal precautions in the HD units, although sometimes can appeared seroconversions and epidemic bud when exist a break of these. Is analyzed different situations with special focus in units for acute patients. The following steps under the suspicious of the epidemic bud appeared in one of the annexes together with legislation according to this case. Respect to the staff in every one of the virus is shown prevention patterns, serologic markers to perform when an accident with infected blood occur, also is considered when treatment is indicated. The guides considered too the conditions necessary for include these patients on waiting list for kidney transplantation.

Moon J, Island E, Weppler D, Kato T, Tekin A, Selvaggi G, Nakamura N, Ruiz P, Nishida S, Levi D, Martin P, Schiff E, Tzakis AG. · Miami Transplant Institute, University of Miami, Miami, USA. · Clin Transpl. · Pubmed #18637467 No free full text.

Abstract: The clinical outcome of LT has improved significantly with refinements in surgical skill and immunosuppressive agents. Over the past decade, nationally most LT centers have improved their standard care in LT. As a result, short-term survival after LT has increased remarkably. However, recurrence of original liver disease, chronic rejection, and the adverse effect of immunosuppressive agents still impose significant limitations on long-term survival. Here at the MTI, it is our mission to continue technical innovation, improve the management of hepatitis C patients, search for better immunosuppressive protocols, and work towards achieving tolerance after LT to improve the long-term outcome.

Anonymous00331, Demetris AJ, Adeyi O, Bellamy CO, Clouston A, Charlotte F, Czaja A, Daskal I, El-Monayeri MS, Fontes P, Fung J, Gridelli B, Guido M, Haga H, Hart J, Honsova E, Hubscher S, Itoh T, Jhala N, Jungmann P, Khettry U, Lassman C, Ligato S, Lunz JG, Marcos A, Minervini MI, Mölne J, Nalesnik M, Nasser I, Neil D, Ochoa E, Pappo O, Randhawa P, Reinholt FP, Ruiz P, Sebagh M, Spada M, Sonzogni A, Tsamandas AC, Wernerson A, Wu T, Yilmaz F. · No affiliation provided · Hepatology. · Pubmed #16871565 No free full text.

Abstract: Evaluation of needle biopsies and extensive clinicopathological correlation play an important role in the determination of liver allograft dysfunction occurring more than 1 year after transplantation. Interpretation of these biopsies can be quite difficult because of the high incidence of recurrent diseases that show histopathological, clinical, and serological features that overlap with each other and with rejection. Also, more than one insult can contribute to allograft injury. In an attempt to enable centers to compare and pool results, improve therapy, and better understand pathophysiological disease mechanisms, the Banff Working Group on Liver Allograft Pathology herein proposes a set of consensus criteria for the most common and problematic causes of late liver allograft dysfunction, including late-onset acute and chronic rejection, recurrent and new-onset viral and autoimmune hepatitis, biliary strictures, and recurrent primary biliary cirrhosis and primary sclerosing cholangitis. A discussion of differential diagnosis is also presented.

Oton E, Barcena R, Garcia-Garzon S, Moreno-Zamora A, Moreno A, Garcia-Gonzalez M, Blesa C, Foruny JR, Ruiz P. · Liver Gastroenterology Service, Ramon y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #16386597 No free full text.

Abstract: The efficacy of pegylated interferon (p-IFN) and ribavirin (RB) in transplant patients is not well known. Chronic hepatitis C evolves in a more aggressive form after transplantation, causing a worse survival. Twenty-one naïve patients with recurrent chronic hepatitis C demonstrated by biopsy were treated for 48 weeks with p-IFN alpha2b (1.5 microg/kg/wk) and RB (>10.6 mg/kg/d). Quantification of RNA was performed (Amplicor Cobas 2.0 Roche) at baseline, 4, 12, 24, 48, and 72 weeks. A qualitative technique was used when quantitative levels were undetectable. At more than 1 year since liver transplantation we did not detect coinfection with human immunodeficiency virus or use steroid treatment. Among the cohort there were 16 men (76.2%). The mean overall age was 52 +/- 12 years. Time from liver transplant to treatment was 1637 +/- 1030 days. They were all infected with genotype 1. Eight patients received cyclosporine and the others tacrolimus. One patient was coinfected with hepatitis B virus and was receiving lamivudine. The mean initial histological activity index was 6.9 +/- 1.5 and fibrosis, 2.52 +/- 1.8 (Ishak). Two patients needed spleen embolization before the treatment. Two patients had to stop the treatment: one due to clinical intolerance, and the other one due to a cholangitis. In 14%, p-IFN doses were adjusted. In 32% RB was adjusted. Five (23.8%) did not respond at 24 weeks. Fourteen (66.7%) showed end-treatment responses but four relapsed at 72 weeks. A sustained viral response was achieved in 9 (42.8%). One patient died due to arterial thrombosis just after completing the treatment.

Kato T, Yoshida H, Sadfar K, Martinez E, Nishida S, Moon J, Madariaga J, Selvaggi G, Levi D, Ruiz P, Schiff E, Tzakis A. · Division of Transplant, University of Miami, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #15848674 No free full text.

Abstract: Recurrence of hepatitis C (HepC) has been a most difficult dilemma in liver transplantation (OLT) because the effects of immunosuppression with steroid, mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) calcineurin antagonists, and anti-interleukin-2 antibody as well as the role of preemptive antiviral therapy are uncertain. In this study, we randomized OLT recipients with HepC into two treatment arms: tacrolimus+daclizumab+MMF (study arm) versus tacrolimus+steroids+MMF (control arm). The study arm only received steroids for the treatment of biopsy-proven rejection episodes. Both arms received preemptive anti-viral therapy with Pegasys and ribavirin. The 39 enrolled patients (among 50 to be enrolled) have median follow-up of 458 days with 23 patients (8 in study arm, 15 in control arm) having reached 1 year. The incidences of rejection episodes within 0 to 3 months, 3 to 6 months, and 6 to 12 months were (study vs control): 0% vs 28%; 0% vs 6%; and 13% vs 20%; respectively (P = NS). The 1-year protocol biopsies showed advanced fibrosis (stage 3 or greater) in 20% (3 of 15) of the control arm, but none (0 of 7) of the study arm (P = NS). We compared anticipated side effects of steroids in the first 3 months (study vs control): hypertension (36% vs 58%, P = NS), PTDM (7% vs 43%, P = .02), and wound infections (14% vs 37%, P = NS). In conclusion, liver transplant recipients with HepC tolerate a steroid-free protocol. There was a trend toward reduced steroid side effects and a lower incidence of advanced fibrosis in 1-year biopsy samples among patients receiving the steroid-free protocol.

Testillano M, Fernandez JR, Suarez MJ, Gastaca M, Bustamante J, Pijoan JI, Montejo M, Valdivieso A, Ruiz P, Gonzalez J, Ortiz de Urbina J. · Gastroenterology and Liver Unit, Hospital de Cruces, Bilbao, Vizcaya, Spain. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #19376421 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Posttransplant hepatitis C virus (HCV) recurrence has been shown to negatively impact graft and patient survivals. It has been suggested that HCV recurrence among HIV- and HCV-coinfected transplant recipients is even more aggressive. OBJECTIVE: To compare the histological severity and survival of posttransplant HCV recurrence between HIV- and HCV-coinfected and HCV-monoinfected patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Among 72 adult patients who underwent primary liver transplantation at our institution for HCV-related cirrhosis between October 2001 and April 2007. We excluded one coinfected patient who died on postoperative day 5 leaving 12 HIV- and HCV-coinfected patients for comparison with 59 monoinfected patients. When listed, all coinfected patients fulfilled the criteria of the Spanish Consensus Document for transplantation in HIV patients. Immunosuppression did not differ between the two groups: all were treated with tacrolimus + steroids (slow tapering). Aggressive HCV recurrence was defined as cholestatic hepatitis and/or a fibrosis grade > or =2 during the first posttransplant year. RESULTS: Coinfected patients were younger than monoinfected patients: 45 +/- 6 years vs 55 +/- 9 years (P = .0008). There were no differences in Child score, Model for End-stage Liver Disease score, donor age, graft steatosis, ischemia time, HCV pretransplant viral load or genotype between the groups. Significant rejection episodes were also equally distributed (25% vs 14%; P = .38). Seven coinfected patients and 29 monoinfected patients developed aggressive HCV recurrences (58% vs 49%; P = .75). Median follow-up was 924 days. Global survival at 3 years was 80%. Survivals at 1, 2, and 3 years were 83%, 75%, 62% in the coinfected vs 98%, 89%, 84% in the monoinfected patients, respectively (log-rank test = 0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The severity of histological recurrence was similar among HIV- and HCV-coinfected and monoinfected HCV liver recipients in the first posttransplant year. Mortality attributed to recurrent HCV was similar in the groups. There were no short-term (3-year) differences in survival between the two groups of patients.

Kato T, Gaynor JJ, Yoshida H, Montalvano M, Takahashi H, Pyrsopoulos N, Nishida S, Moon J, Selvaggi G, Levi D, Ruiz P, Schiff E, Tzakis A. · Department of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #17984834 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Due to the known high recurrence rate of hepatitis C virus (HCV) among orthotopic liver transplant (OLT) recipients who receive tacrolimus+corticosteroid maintenance, use of steroid-free induction was considered. METHODS: OLT recipients with HCV were randomized to receive tacrolimus+daclizumab (steroid-free) vs. tacrolimus+corticosteroids during 1999-2001 and then tacrolimus+mycophenolate mofetil (MMF)+daclizumab (steroid-free) vs. tacrolimus+MMF+corticosteroids during 2002-2005. Patients in the steroid-free arm of both periods received no steroids except for treating biopsy-proven rejection. Primary objective was to compare mean fibrosis stage at the 1-year protocol biopsy, between the steroid-free and corticosteroid arms, stratifying by period. RESULTS: No noticeable differences in mean fibrosis stage between the two treatment arms, either averaging across periods (P=0.99) or during either period (P>0.35) were found. Occurrence of acute rejection during the first year was the only factor associated with a significantly increased fibrosis stage at 1 year (P=0.0003); stage > or =2 was seen in 63% (17 of 27) vs. 19% (8 of 43) of those with vs. without rejection. In addition, MMF use was associated with significantly fewer patients experiencing acute rejection during the first 6 and 12 months posttransplant (P=0.006 and 0.046). Regarding steroid-related side effects, posttransplant diabetes mellitus occurred in 10% vs. 45%, and wound infection in 6% vs. 31% of steroid-free vs. corticosteroid patients (P=0.003 and 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: OLT recipients with HCV tolerated the steroid-free protocol with fewer side effects; however, its use had no apparent impact on hepatic fibrosis progression. Occurrence of acute rejection was strongly associated with increased hepatic fibrosis at 1 year, and MMF use appears to have significantly reduced the rejection rate.

Gaynor JJ, Moon JI, Kato T, Nishida S, Selvaggi G, Levi DM, Island ER, Pyrsopoulos N, Weppler D, Ganz S, Ruiz P, Tzakis AG. · Department of Surgery, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, 33101, USA. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #17667806 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) distinct causes of graft failure (GF) and death with a functioning graft (DFG) exist. Prognostic factors for one failure type may be distinctly different from those predictive of other types, and an accurate portrayal of these relationships may more clearly explain each factor's importance. METHODS: A multivariable cause-specific hazard (CSH) rate analysis using Cox stepwise regression was performed among 877 adults who received primary OLT during 1996-2004 with tacrolimus+steroids as immunosuppression. RESULTS: Older donor age (P=0.004) implied greater primary dysfunction GF, while primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC; P=0.0002) implied greater vascular thrombosis GF. Recurrent nonmalignant liver disease GF was higher among hepatitis C virus patients (P<0.00001), and younger recipient age (P=0.005) implied greater death from recurrent (metastatic) hepatocellular carcinoma. African-American race (P<0.00001), PSC (P=0.003), and younger recipient age (P=0.005) were independently associated with greater GF due to chronic rejection. Older donor age (P=0.003) implied greater infection DFG, while older recipient age (P=0.003) and pretransplant diabetes (P=0.03) were independently associated with greater cardiovascular/cerebrovascular DFG. Finally, most of these cause-specific predictors were not significant in an overall Cox model for graft survival. CONCLUSIONS: The CSH approach should be more widely used in investigations of prognostic factors. The result of older donor age implying greater primary dysfunction GF and infection DFG but having no association with other failure types demonstrates that its impact is specific to the graft's early posttransplant functional status. In addition, while recipient age was an important prognosticator, its direction of association reverses depending upon the outcome being analyzed.

Kato T, Selvaggi G, Panagiotis T, Hernandez E, McLaughlin G, Moon J, Nishida S, Levi D, Thompson J, Halliday N, Ruiz P, Tzakis A. · Department of Surgery, University of Miami, Liver and GI Transplant, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #17175346 No free full text.

Abstract: Since Campath 1H (C1H) has been successfully used in adult liver transplant recipients since 2001 in our program, we started to use it in children. PATIENTS AND METHODS: C1H induction was employed in 10 children with autoimmune hepatitis (AIH) (n = 6), primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC) (n = 1), biliary atresia (n = 1), glycogen storage disease (n = 1), and Wilson's disease. Eight were primary transplants, and two retransplants. Patients ages ranged from 5 to 17 years. C1H was administered at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg on days 0, 4, and 7. Tacrolimus level was maintained at 5 to 10 ng/mL. No patient received maintenance steroids posttransplantation except two who were on steroid therapy at the time transplant. They were prescribed small doses of maintenance steroids. Median follow-up of C1H recipients was 679 days (range 115-1143). RESULTS: Postoperative courses were mostly uneventful except for one retransplant recipient who required prolonged hospitalization (40 days) for rehabilitation. Median hospital stay was 12 days (range 7-40 days). All 10 patients in the C1H group are currently alive and well with stable graft function. No opportunistic infection was observed in these patients to date. We compared six patients with AIH who received C1H to the historic control of 10 recipients with AIH who received conventional immunosuppression (tacrolimus + steroid). The patients treated with C1H showed significantly prolonged rejection-free survival. CONCLUSION: In our preliminary experience, C1H induction was well tolerated in pediatric liver recipients. Rejections-free survival was prolonged among recipients with AIH despite a low level of maintenance immunosuppression.

Kato T, Selvaggi G, Levi D, Hernandez E, Takahashi H, Velasco M, Moon J, Nishida S, Thompson J, Ruiz P, Sfakianakis G, Tzakis A. · Department of Liver and GI Transplant, University of Miami, Liver and Gastrointestinal Transplant, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #17175345 No free full text.

Abstract: Auxiliary partial orthotopic liver transplantation (APOLT) has been performed for both metabolic disorders and fulminant liver failure (FHF). When the native liver regenerates, the patients with FHF who undergo APOLT have a chance to withdraw immunosuppression. It may be most beneficial for children. This preliminary report describes our start to routinely offer APOLT as an option to standard OLT for children with FHF in 2005. Six children (ages 8 months to 8 years) received APOLT: 1 in 1996 and the others in 2005 and 2006. The donor ages ranged from 4 to 40 years. We used either a left lateral segment or a left lobe graft. The recipient left lobe, which was removed, showed submassive to massive necrosis at the time of transplantation. All children are alive and well. The first patient who received APOLT in 1996 is currently off immunosuppression with a fully recovered native liver; the grafted liver underwent complete atrophy. The 5 remaining subjects are receiving reduced levels of immunosuppression with close monitoring. Their serial liver biopsy specimens show slight to significant recovery. One developed hepatic artery thrombosis, requiring retransplantation. The native liver was retained at the time of retransplantation (redo APOLT). Other postoperative complications included a bile leak (n = 1), invasive mucomycosis of the arm (preexisting condition; n = 1), biliary stricture (n = 1), and acute cellular rejection (n = 3). Posttransplantation length of stay was 6 to 60 days (median, 15 days). In conclusion, APOLT can be safely performed in children with FHF displaying short-term outcomes comparable to standard transplantations.

Bejarano PA, Garcia MT, Rodriguez MM, Ruiz P, Tzakis AG. · Department of Pathology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Jackson Memorial Hospital, 1611 NW 12th Ave Holtz Bldg, Room 2042, Miami, FL 33136, USA. · Virchows Arch. · Pubmed #17024424 No free full text.

Abstract: Ground-glass hepatocytes have been described in Lafora's disease, fibrinogen deposition, hepatitis B, type IV glycogenosis, and alcohol aversion (cyanamide) therapy. We encountered ground-glass hepatocytes with intracytoplasmic inclusions in four liver biopsies from three transplanted patients who had none of the above-mentioned underlying diseases. One patient was a 4-year-old boy who had a kidney transplant for severe ureterovesical reflux. Patient 2 was a 52-year-old man who had two liver transplants because of hepatitis C. The third patient was a 7-month-old girl who underwent a multivisceral transplant because of necrotizing enterocolitis and liver failure induced by total parenteral nutrition. The patients developed liver abnormalities from 45 days to 4 years after their transplants. The livers showed conspicuous ground-glass hepatocytes in 90% of the children's samples and 30% of the adult liver cells. The cytoplasmic bodies stained strongly for Gomori methenamine-silver; they were positive for periodic acid-Schiff without diastase, but negative after diastase digestion. They were negative for colloidal iron and hepatitis B core and surface antigens. Electron microscopy revealed non-membrane bound aggregates of glycogen. Idiopathic ground-glass hepatocytes occur in transplanted patients and represent accumulation of altered glycogen. However, their clinical significance and cause are not entirely elucidated.

Matorin AA, McCurtis H, Jones BE, Varma S, Nene S, Ruiz P, Gorman JM. · University of Texas Medical School at Houston, TX, USA. · J Psychiatr Pract. · Pubmed #16732140 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Nishida S, Gaynor JJ, Nakamura N, Butt F, Illanes HG, Kadono J, Neff GW, Levi DM, Moon JI, Selvaggi G, Kato T, Ruiz P, Tzakis AG, Madariaga JR. · Division of Transplantation, Department of Surgery, University of Miami/Jackson Memorial Medical Center, Miami, Florida, USA. · Am J Transplant. · Pubmed #16433768 No free full text.

Abstract: A retrospective study of 1058 liver transplant recipients was performed to determine: (i) the incidence, etiology, timing, clinical features and treatment of refractory ascites (RA), (ii) risk factors for RA development, (iii) predictors of RA disappearance, (iv) predictors of survival following RA and (v) the impact of RA on patient survival. Sixty-two patients (5.9%) developed RA and its disappearance occurred in 27/62 cases. Patients having hepatitis C virus (HCV) had a significantly higher hazard rate of developing RA (p < 0.00001). No other baseline characteristic was associated with RA. Cox stepwise regression analysis of the hazard rate of RA disappearance found two significant factors: HCV recurrence as the reason for developing RA implied a poorer outcome (p = 0.006), whereas an unknown reason implied a favorable outcome (p = 0.02). In addition, survival following RA was significantly poorer among patients having bacterial peritonitis or HCV recurrence. Finally, the mortality rate was significantly (nearly 8.6 times) higher in patients following RA development while it was ongoing (p < 0.00001); however, if the RA disappeared, then the additional risk of death also disappeared. This study illustrates the importance of developing an optimal treatment strategy to (i) effectively treat RA if it develops and (ii) prevent hepatitis C recurrence.

Neff GW, Shire N, Ruiz P, O'Brien C, Garcia M, Dela Garza J, Rudich SR, Reddy KR. · Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, Ohio 45267-0595, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #16387130 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The exact cause and appropriate treatment for cholestasis following liver transplantation in recipients with hepatitis C virus recurrence (RHCV) are difficult to determine. Our objective was to determine the diagnostic accuracy of clinical and histological parameters in liver transplant recipients with RHCV and concurrent cholestasis. METHODS: A retrospective analysis from June 1996 to May 2003 was performed on adult liver transplant (OLT) recipients with hepatitis C virus. Patients with cholestasis (bilirubin >5 mg/dL, 6 months after OLT) were selected. Demographics, etiology, immune suppression, clinical and histologic outcomes, and virologic features were evaluated. Patients were divided into two groups based on clinical and histological criteria: (1) patients with parameters suggestive of cholestatic HCV; and (2) patients with parameters consistent with acute cellular rejection. RESULTS: Thirty-seven patients met study criteria (20 males). The average age was 54 years (range = 14-72), and time from transplant to jaundice was 769 days (range = 48-2981). The groups were comparable regarding HCV viral load, age, gender, time from transplant, and United Network of Organ Sharing status at time of transplant. Retransplantation was performed in two patients in group 1, neither of whom survived, and in three patients in group 2, all of whom survived. Clinical parameters correlated well with diagnosis of cholestasis (r = 0.85, P < .001) whereas histological evaluation did not (r = 0.11, P = .53). Mortality in group 1 was 78% (7 of 9) vs. 50% (13 of 26) in group 2. Median duration of survival following liver transplantation in group 1 was 132 days versus 435 days in group 2. CONCLUSION: Clinical diagnosis parameters for RHCV with cholestasis appear more accurate than histology parameters and should be the primary consideration in directing therapy. Despite timely diagnosis, cholestatic RHCV LTx recipients have a poor prognosis.

Tryphonopoulos P, Madariaga JR, Kato T, Nishida S, Levi DM, Moon J, Selvaggi G, De Faria W, Regev A, Bejarano P, Khaled A, Safdar K, Esquenazi V, Weppler D, Yoshida H, Ruiz P, Miller J, Tzakis AG. · Department of Surgery, Division of Transplantation, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, Florida 33136, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #15848669 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We report our experience with Campath 1H in adult liver allotransplantation. METHODS: Between December 2001 and February 2004, 77 patients underwent liver transplantation using Campath 1H induction and low-dose maintenance tacrolimus immunosuppression. The control group consisted of 50 patients with similar baseline characteristics and the same eligibility criteria, transplanted under our standard Tacrolimus/steroids regimen. Hepatitis C patients were excluded from the study. RESULTS: Patient and graft survival were similar for both groups. The incidence of rejection was significantly lower in the Campath vs the control group (51% vs 65% at 12 months, P = .009). Tacrolimus trough levels and conversion from Tacrolimus or the addition of other immunosuppressive drugs due to nephrotoxicity were also significantly lower in the Campath 1H group. CONCLUSION: Campath 1H induction with low-dose Tacrolimus maintenance immunosuppression is an effective regimen in reducing acute rejection in adult liver transplantation, while maintaining lower tacrolimus levels and less nephrotoxicity than our conventional immunosuppressive regimen.

Neff GW, delaGarza J, Shire N, Nishida S, O'Brien CB, Safdar K, Madariaga J, Schiff E, Ruiz P. · University of Cincinnati, School of Medicine, Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #15686695 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Adequate immune suppression following liver transplantation in recipients with recurrence of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not standardized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between immune suppression protocol and the clinical/histological parameters in HCV transplant recipients with an HCV recurrence. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed on recipients of liver transplants from June 1998 to October 2003 who experienced HCV recurrence. Only patients with liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years following liver transplantation were included in the analysis. The data set included: patient demographics, immune suppression, antiviral therapies, as well as histology to evaluate ductopenia and chronic rejection. Patients divided into groups of high, medium, and low immune suppression were subdivided by treatment with versus without interferon. A control group with similar demographics suffering from cryptogenic cirrhosis was used for comparison. RESULTS: During this period 45 patients had liver biopsies at 3 to 5 years posttransplantation. Their mean age was 56.5 years and mean time from transplant to biopsy was 1543 days. Their average posttransplant survival was 1964 days. There was no difference among the three groups with respect to HCV RNA levels (log(10) IU/mL), age, gender, time from transplant, donor age, and UNOS status. Median HCV RNA levels within the three groups were comparable at various time periods pre- and posttransplant. CONCLUSION: The development of chronic allograft damage following transplantation in recipients with recurrent HCV tended to be worse among patients with low levels of immune suppression, suggesting the importance of therapy to maintain allograft function.

Neff GW, O'Brien CB, Nery J, Shire NJ, Nishida S, delaGarza J, Montalbano M, Safdar K, Ruiz P, Rideman E, Gascon JA, Tzakis AG, Madariaga J, Rudich SM. · University of Cincinnati, Ohio, USA. <> · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #15558835 links to  free full text

Abstract: Hepatitis C virus (HCV) is becoming the most common indication for liver retransplantation (ReLTx). This study was a retrospective review of the medical records of liver transplant patients at our institution to determine factors that would identify the best candidates for ReLTx resulting from allograft failure because of HCV recurrence. The patients were divided into 2 groups on the basis of indication for initial liver transplant. Group 1 included ReLTx patients whose initial indication for LTx was HCV. Group 2 included patients who received ReLTx who did not have a history of HCV. We defined chronic allograft dysfunction (AD) as patients with persistent jaundice (> 30 days) beginning 6 months after primary liver transplant in the absence of other reasons. HCV was the primary indication for initial orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) in 491/1114 patients (44%) from July 1996 to February 2004. The number of patients with AD undergoing ReLTx in Groups 1 and 2 was 22 and 12, respectively. The overall patient and allograft survival at 1 year was 50% and 75% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = .04). The rates of primary nonfunction and technical problems after ReLTx were not different between the groups. However, the incidence of recurrent AD was higher in Group 1 at 32% versus 17% in Group 2 (P = .04). Important factors that predicted a successful ReLTx included physical condition at the time of ReLTx (P = .002) and Child-Turcotte-Pugh score (P = .008). In conclusion, HCV is associated with an increased incidence of chronic graft destruction with a negative effect on long-term results after ReLTx. The optimum candidate for ReLTx is a patient who can maintain normal physical activity. As the allograft shortage continues, the optimal use of cadaveric livers continues to be of primary importance. The use of deceased donor livers in patients with allograft failure caused by HCV remains a highly controversial issue.

Neff GW, Montalbano M, O'Brien CB, Nishida S, Safdar K, Bejarano PA, Khaled AS, Ruiz P, Slapak-Green G, Lee M, Nery J, De Medina M, Tzakis A, Schiff ER. · Center for Liver Diseases, Division of GI Transplant, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL, USA. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #15548967 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The management issues of transplant patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) are complex, and interferon therapy is often ineffective. We present data from a retrospective review in liver-transplant recipients suffering from HCV recurrence that were treated with pegylated alpha-2b interferon and ribavirin. METHODS: A retrospective review of transplant recipients that received combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon (1.5 mcg/kg/wk) and ribavirin (400-600 mg/day) therapy intended for at least 48 weeks. Complications were recorded and included neutropenia (<750 cells), anemia (hemoglobin <8 g) with and without treatment consisting of blood transfusions, erythropoietin, or dose reduction of ribavirin, and depression. The diagnosis of HCV recurrence was determined by an increase in liver chemistries, histopathologic findings with inflammation along with viral recurrence using the COBAS AMPLICOR HCV test. RESULTS: Fifty-seven liver-transplant recipients were included, 29 naive (group 1) to therapy and 28 nonresponders (group 2) to at least 6 months of interferon and ribavirin therapy. Eight (27.6%) patients in group 1 and six (21%) patients in group 2 were HCV nondetectable at the end of 48 weeks of therapy. Ribavirin therapy was decreased in 13 of 29 (45%) for group 1 and 11 of 28 (39%) in group 2. Therapeutic interventions were 4 of 57 (7%) blood transfusions, 23 of 57 (40%) erythropoietin, and 17 of 57 (30%) filgrastim. CONCLUSION: Combination pegylated interferon with ribavirin appears to effective therapy in HCV recurrence and in HCV nonresponsive to interferon and ribavirin. This data reveals the difficulty and caution that must be taken when treating HCV-R liver-transplant recipients with combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon and ribavirin therapy.

Neff GW, Nery J, Lau DT, O'Brien CB, Duncan R, Shire NJ, Ruiz P, Nery C, Montalbano M, Muslu H, Safdar K, Schiff ER, Tzakis AG, Madariaga JR. · College of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, 231 Albert Sabin Way, MSB Room 6560, Cincinnati, OH 45267-0595, USA. · Ann Pharmacother. · Pubmed #15507498 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) strains develop in 30% of liver transplant recipients treated with lamivudine within 2 years from the time of transplantation. OBJECTIVE: To assess safety and outcomes of tenofovir salvage therapy for patients with lamivudine resistance in a retrospective cohort of liver-transplanted patients. METHODS: Medical records were retrospectively evaluated for patients who received tenofovir. Data collected included demographics, HBV serologic information prior to and during tenofovir therapy, drug-related complications, and creatinine clearance. Criteria for lamivudine resistance included elevation of liver chemistries along with reappearance of hepatitis B surface antigen, hepatitis Be antigen, and/or HBV DNA. RESULTS: Sixteen patients showed resistance to lamivudine at 10-85 months (median 26) following liver transplantation. Tenofovir 300 mg/day orally was added in 8 patients 1-66 months after the development of viral lamivudine resistance and continued for 14-26 months (median 19.3). All 8 patients experienced HBV DNA viral suppression, with 7 currently nondetectable. No adverse events were reported, and creatinine clearance was not impaired. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that tenofovir safely and markedly decreases replication of lamivudine-resistant HBV variants after liver transplantation and is another potential option for the treatment of HBV lamivudine resistance.

Neff GW, O'brien CB, Nery J, Shire N, Montalbano M, Ruiz P, Nery C, Safdar K, De Medina M, Tzakis AG, Schiff ER, Madariaga J. · Center for Liver Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA. · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #15497163 links to  free full text

Abstract: Hepatitis B virus (HBV) recurrence following liver transplantation (LTx) has been controllable primarily with the use of hepatitis B immune globulin (HBIg) and lamivudine (LAM). However, HBV resistance to LAM and/or HBIg has become an increasing problem prompting the use of newer antiviral agents. The purpose of our study was to investigate the association between therapy, HBV breakthrough, and allograft / patient survival in HBV-positive liver transplant recipients. We performed a retrospective review of the medical records of patients that were transplanted for HBV from June 1994 to May 2003. A total of 92 patients, positive for either hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) or HBV deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) pretransplant, received LAM monotherapy or HBIg (6 months) plus LAM therapy post-liver transplant. HBV breakthrough post-LTx was noted in 14 patients. All patients had detectable HBV DNA prior to liver transplantation; none of the patients that were HBV DNA negative prior to transplant had detectable HBV DNA posttransplant. Of these 14, 9 patients (64%) were switched from LAM to adefovir dipivoxil (ADF) and 5 patients (36%) to tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TNV). In conclusion, pre-LTx HBV viremia should be considered in planning post-LTx prophylaxis. Trials to evaluate oral antiviral agents in combination with or without HBIg therapy are needed.

Regev A, Molina E, Moura R, Bejarano PA, Khaled A, Ruiz P, Arheart K, Berho M, Drachenberg CB, Mendez P, O'Brien C, Jeffers L, Tzakis A, Schiff ER. · Division of Hepatology, Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL 33136, USA. · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #15376303 links to  free full text

Abstract: Histopathologic assessment is considered essential for the differentiation of recurrent hepatitis C (RHC) from acute cellular rejection (ACR) after liver transplantation (LT); however, there is limited information regarding its reliability. The aim of this study was to determine the interobserver and intraobserver agreement of the histopathologic diagnosis of RHC vs. ACR, and to determine the reliability of specific histopathologic features for the differentiation of RHC from ACR. Liver biopsy specimens from 105 consecutive patients transplanted for hepatitis C virus (HCV)-related liver disease were studied retrospectively. All the biopsies were performed for evaluation of abnormal liver enzymes within the 1st year after LT. The slides were blindly coded and assessed by 5 liver-transplant pathologists, practicing at 3 medical centers. The pathologists were asked to render a diagnosis, and determine the severity of the disease. Four of the pathologists were asked to determine the presence and severity of 36 histopathologic features. A total of 34 of the samples were then blindly resubmitted to each of the 4 pathologists to determine the intraobserver agreement. There was a slight agreement (kappa = .12) among the 5 pathologists on the histopathologic diagnosis. All 5 pathologists were in agreement on the diagnosis of RHC in only 5 patients (5%) and on the diagnosis of ACR in only 2 patients (2%). The best agreement among any 4 pathologists was fair (kappa = .20). Slight to moderate agreement occurred on the main histological features considered to be important in the diagnosis of ACR. Intraobserver agreement ranged from slight (kappa = .19) to moderate (kappa = .42) among 4 pathologists. In conclusion, the histopathologic differentiation of RHC from ACR after LT had relatively low interobserver and intraobserver agreement rates, and hence showed low reliability. Histopathologic assessment should be used cautiously for the differentiation of RHC from ACR post-LT.

Neff GW, Ruiz P, Madariaga JR, Nishida S, Montalbano M, Meyer D, Levi DM, Tzakis AG, O'Brien CB. · University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH, USA. · Ann Pharmacother. · Pubmed #15328399 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sirolimus is an immunosuppressant that exerts anti-rejection activity by inhibiting T-cell activity and is used to treat chronic rejection and calcineurin-related nephrotoxicity. Unlike tacrolimus and cyclosporine, it has no effect on calcineurin activity in liver transplant recipients. OBJECTIVE: To report correlates of survival outcomes in a series of patients with putative sirolimus-related hepatotoxicity after liver transplant. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent a liver transplant for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) and who received sirolimus immunosuppressive therapy between November 2000 and November 2003. Extracted data included sirolimus serum concentrations, frequency of sirolimus-related adverse effects, drug-related clinical hepatitis, and survival outcomes. RESULTS: Ten patients were found to have been treated with sirolimus for either renal insufficiency (n = 6) or chronic rejection (n = 4). Six patients had liver biopsies, while the remaining 4 patients were clinically diagnosed with rejection. Two of the 6 patients demonstrated changes consistent with sinusoidal congestion and one with eosinophilia, consistent with an allergic drug reaction. HCV viral load increased slightly, from 600 000 to 700 000 IU/mL. Mean baseline transaminase levels were 45 IU/L for aspartate aminotransferase and 50 IU/L for alanine aminotransferase, with peak levels of 210 and 180 IU/L, respectively. The time to transaminase increase was a mean of 21 days when sirolimus was added, with resolution within 27 days (mean) after its discontinuation. No changes were evident in antiviral therapy. Combination sirolimus and tacrolimus concentrations were maintained at >10 ng/mL; average monotherapy with sirolimus was 12 ng/mL, and average time on therapy was 25 weeks. CONCLUSIONS: Sirolimus-related hepatotoxicity is an important complication after liver transplant. Immediate recognition is critical to avoid confusion with other causes of abnormal serum aminotransferases after liver transplant, and discontinuation of the drug may be required.

Neff GW, O'Brien CB, Cirocco R, Montalbano M, de Medina M, Ruiz P, Khaled AS, Bejarano PA, Safdar K, Hill MA, Tzakis AG, Schiff ER. · Center for Liver Diseases and Division of GI Transplant, Department of Medicine, University of Miami, FL 33136, USA. · Liver Transpl. · Pubmed #15108250 links to  free full text

Abstract: The optimal duration of therapy for pegylated interferon combined with ribavirin in recurrent Hepatitis C virus (HCV) following liver transplantation is not known. We wanted to determine if testing for HCV in liver tissue by reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) was superior in predicting sustained virological response (SVR) in comparison to standard HCV ribonucleic acid (RNA) detection in the serum. All recipients received combination pegylated alpha-2b interferon (1.5 mcg/kg) and ribavirin (200-600 mg/d) therapy for at least 48 weeks of therapy and were found to have nondetectable HCV RNA by PCR serum testing at the end of therapy. Sustained virological response (SVR) was defined as nondetectable serum HCV RNA at 6 months post treatment withdrawal. Ten liver transplant recipients were included in the study; mean time from transplantation was 29.2 months. All had nondetectable serum HCV RNA by RT-PCR. In hepatic tissue 7/10 patients HCV RNA was found to be positive by RT-PCR while 3/10 had nondetectable HCV RNA in their liver by RT-PCR. SVR was attained in all 3/10 that were hepatic tissue HCV PCR negative after 12 months of combination therapy. In conclusion, direct detection of HCV RNA by RT-PCR of liver tissue appears to more effectively predict SVR following pegylated interferon and ribavirin therapy than the conventional use of serum.

Nery JR, Nery-Avila C, Reddy KR, Cirocco R, Weppler D, Levi DM, Nishida S, Madariaga J, Kato T, Ruiz P, Schiff E, Tzakis AG. · University of Miami School of Medicine, Department of Surgery, Division of Liver/GI Transplantation, Miami, FL, USA. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #12717200 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The increasing demand for transplantation has resulted in a trend toward using virologically compromised donors. We reviewed our experience with liver grafts from hepatitis-B surface antigen (HBsAg)(-), antibody to core antigen (anti-HBc)(+) donors. METHODS: Sixty-two liver transplants using HBsAg(-), anti-HBc(+) donors were studied. The decision to use prophylaxis was based on the presence or absence of donor and recipient risk factors for posttransplant hepatitis-B virus (HBV) transmission or reinfection. If the donor or recipient showed positive HBVDNA, hepatitis-B immunoglobulin (HBIg) and lamivudine were used. If both donor and recipient HBVDNA were negative, a choice between lamivudine and no prophylaxis was made on the basis of presence or absence of HBsAg and antibody to the surface antigen (anti-HBs) in the recipient. RESULTS: No death or graft loss could be ascribed to HBV. Mild HBV infection occurred in two patients who were not taking the recommended prophylaxis. Among the other 60 patients, 1 showed positive e antigen (HBeAg) early after transplantation, and 2 (1 with recurrent cancer, 1 with HIV infection) showed HBsAg(+). None of the three patients had any other evidence of HBV infection. Forty-seven patients underwent liver biopsies. Changes consistent with hepatitis were observed in 26, and 24 had HCV infection; immunostains for HBV antigens were negative in all cases, and 7 showed positive HBVDNA. CONCLUSIONS: A selective protocol based on donor and recipient risk factors for post-liver transplant HBV infection can prevent hepatitis-B infection and avoid unnecessary administration of antiviral prophylaxis in recipients of HBsAg(-), anti-HBc(+) liver allografts.

Pinna AD, Ricordi C, Weppler D, Ruiz P, Tzakis AG. · Department of Surgery and Pathology, Liver/GI Transplant Division, Cell Transplant Division and Immunopathology, University of Miami, School of Medicine, Miami, Florida, USA. · Transplant Proc. · Pubmed #11267203 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.