Hepatitis: Nemecek V

Husa P, Plísek S, Sperl J, Urbánek P, Galský J, Hůlek P, Kümpel P, Nemecek V, Volfová M, Anonymous00254. · Klinika infekcnich chorob Lékarské fakulty MU a FN Brno, pracoviste Bohunice, prednosta. · Klin Mikrobiol Infekc Lek. · Pubmed #18459234 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Husa P, Plísek S, Sperl J, Urbánek P, Galský J, Hůlek P, Kümpel P, Nemecek V, Volfová M, Anonymous00156. · Klinika infekcních chorob Lékarské fakulty MU a FN Brno, pracoviste Bohunice. · Vnitr Lek. · Pubmed #18277633 No free full text.

Abstract: Chronic hepatitis B is one of the world's most common infectious diseases. In the Czech Republic it has a prevalence of 0.56%. Antiviral therapy for chronic hepatitis B demonstrably increases quality of life and where indication criteria are met and standard therapeutic procedures are followed, it is clearly cheaper than treatment for the complications of advanced cirrhosis of the liver or hepatocellular carcinoma. At the time of issuing of this recommendation, 4 medicines were classified for the treatment of chronic hepatitis B in the Czech Republic--pegylated interferon (IFN) alpha-2a, conventional IFN alpha, lamivudine (LAM) and adefovir dipivoxil (ADV). In a number of other developed states, entecavir (ETV) and telbivudine (LdT) have also been approved for treatment. The most effective treatment available at present is pegylated IFN alpha-2a, which should be the medication of first choice for initial treatment of hepatitis B, HBeAg positive and negative forms, provided that there are no contraindications for IFN alpha treatment. Conventional (standard, classical) IFN alpha can also be used, though clinical studies have shown it to be less effective than pegylated IFN alpha-2a. The main advantage of interferon compared to other commercially available medications is its relatively shorter and more clearly defined treatment period, the high probability of permanent suppression of virus replication and seroconversion of HBeAg/anti-HBe (in HBeAg positive forms of the illness) and the non-creation of mutant strains of HBV resistant to IFN in the course of treatment. If there are contraindications for IFN alpha (pegylated or conventional) or it is ineffective or poorly tolerated, ADV, ETV, LAM or LdT can be used. LAM and LdT treatments are often accompanied by the appearance of mutant strains of HBV, that are resistant to lamivudine or LdT and therefore they are not preferred.

Urbánek P, Husa P, Galský J, Sperl J, Kümpel P, Nemecek V, Plísek S, Volfová M. · Interni klinika 1. LF UK a UVN, Praha. · Cas Lek Cesk. · Pubmed #18630184 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Husa P, Linhartová A, Nemecek V, Husová L. · Department of Infectious Diseases, University Hospital Brno, Jihlavska 20, 625 00 Brno, Czech Republic. · Acta Virol. · Pubmed #16402678 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis D virus (HDV) is a small, RNA-containing virus that requires the concomitant presence of Hepatitis B virus (HBV) in an obligate manner for its survival and pathogenicity. HDV infection is very uncommon in Czech Republic. The results of antiviral therapy of hepatitis D patients are not satisfactory. Alpha-interferon (alpha-IFN) in high doses (9-10 MU three times a week for 12 months) is usually recommended.

Deterding K, Constantinescu I, Nedelcu FD, Gervain J, Nemecek V, Srtunecky O, Vince A, Grgurevic I, Bielawski KP, Zalewska M, Bock T, Ambrozaitis A, Stanczak J, Takács M, Chulanov V, Slusarczyk J, Drazd'áková M, Wiegand J, Cornberg M, Manns MP, Wedemeyer H. · Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · J Med Virol. · Pubmed #18712830 No free full text.

Abstract: The importance of hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotypes for disease progression and response to interferon-alpha-based treatment is well established. While almost all patients in the Mediterranean area are infected with HBV genotype D, HBV genotype A is dominant in Northern Europe. However, the distribution of HBV genotypes is unknown for several Central and Eastern European countries. Data are described of 1313 HBsAg-positive patients recruited at 14 referral centers in eight countries. There were only very few cases of HBV genotype B, C, E, F, and H infection while HBV genotypes A and D were found in 42% and 48% of patients, respectively. Eight percent of patients had positive bands for more than one genotype using the hybridization assay. The frequency of genotype A was higher in Poland (77%) and the Czech Republic (67%) as compared to Hungary (47%), Lithuania (41%), Croatia (8%), and Germany (32%). In contrast, HBV genotype D was most frequent in Croatian, Romanian, and Russian patients with 80%, 67%, and 93% of cases, respectively. In conclusion, HBV genotype A versus D showed significantly different distribution patterns in Central and Eastern Europe which deserves consideration for national guidelines and treatment decisions.

Anastassopoulou CG, Kafatos G, Nardone A, Andrews N, Pebody RG, Mossong J, Davidkin I, Gelb D, DE Ory F, Thierfelder W, Nemecek V, Bruzzone B, Butur D, Barbara C, Sobotová Z, Jones L, Griskevicius A, Hesketh LM, Cohen D, Vranckx R, Tsakris A, Miller E, Hatzakis A. · Department of Hygiene and Epidemiology, University of Athens Medical School, Athens, Greece. · Epidemiol Infect. · Pubmed #18694528 No free full text.

Abstract: The European Sero-Epidemiology Network 2 (ESEN2) aimed to compare serological results of vaccine-preventable diseases across Europe. To ensure direct inter-country comparability of hepatitis A virus antibody (anti-HAV) measurements, a standardization panel of 150 sera was developed by a designated reference laboratory and tested by participating national laboratories using assays of choice; each country's results were subsequently regressed against those of the reference laboratory. Quantitatively, the assays were generally highly correlated (R2>0.90). Nevertheless, qualitative comparisons indicated that results obtained with different assays may differ despite the usage of well-established international and local standards. To a great extent standardization successfully alleviated such differences. The generated standardization equations will be used to convert national serological results into common units to enable direct international comparisons of HAV seroprevalence data. The results of this study are expected to contribute to the evaluation and potential improvement of the currently employed immunization strategies for hepatitis in Europe.

Kafatos G, Anastassopoulou C, Nardone A, Andrews N, Barbara C, Boot HJ, Butur D, Davidkin I, Gelb D, Griskevicius A, Hesketh L, Icardi G, Jones L, Kra-Oz Z, Miller E, Mossong J, Nemecek V, de Ory F, Sobotová Z, Thierfelder W, Van Damme P, Hatzakis A. · Health Protection Agency Centre for Infections, London, UK. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #17381718 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of the European Sero-Epidemiology Network 2 was to coordinate and standardize the serological surveillance of vaccine-preventable diseases in Europe. In this study, the standardization of hepatitis B virus (HBV) results is described. The 15 participating national laboratories tested a unique panel of 172 sera established by the Greek reference centre for HBV surface antigen (HBsAg), antibodies to HBsAg (anti-HBs) and/or to the HBV core antigen (anti-HBc) by assay methods of their choice. Country-specific quantitative measurements for anti-HBs and anti-HBc were transformed into common units using standardization equations derived by regressing each country's panel results against the reference centre's results, thus adjusting for interassay and interlaboratory variability. For HBsAg, a qualitative analysis (positive/negative) showed at least 99% agreement with the reference laboratory for all countries. By combining these standardized and qualitative results for the markers mentioned earlier, it was possible to achieve comparable estimates of the proportion of the population susceptible to HBV, vaccinated against HBV, with a past HBV infection, and with a current infection or chronic carrier state. Standardization is a very important tool that allows for international serological comparisons to assess the current vaccination policies and the progress of HBV control in Europe.

Kohl I, Nemecek V, Summerová M, Chlíbek R, Nad'ová K, Mináriková O. · GlaxoSmithKline, Na Pankraci 17/1685, 140 21, Prague 4, Czech Republic. · Eur J Epidemiol. · Pubmed #17160428 No free full text.

Abstract: Administration of human normal immunoglobulin (HNIG) post-exposure has been routinely used in Slovakia for outbreak control of hepatitis A, but requires deep intramuscular injection, provides only short-lived protection and is a human blood product. The protective effect of post-exposure administration of an inactivated hepatitis A vaccine was evaluated during 10 outbreaks in Slovakia. Direct contacts of confirmed hepatitis A cases received either: a single dose of hepatitis A vaccine (n = 2171) or immunoglobulin (HNIG, n = 3837). In the HNIG group the number of hepatitis A confirmed cases dropped within the first 7 weeks, however the decrease was not as rapid or as marked as that observed in the vaccinated group where the number of hepatitis A cases dropped within the first 4 weeks after vaccination. Among contacts, 67 cases of hepatitis A were detected during the maximum incubation period of 45 days: 16 cases (0.7%) in the vaccine group and 51 cases (1.3%) in the HNIG group (p < 0.05). After two and three years respectively, 50 and 39 volunteers who had previously received one dose of hepatitis A vaccine received a booster dose and anti-HAV antibodies were measured. Differences in anti-HAV antibody GMCs before and after the booster were statistically significant. The longer time interval (3 years instead of 2) between primary vaccination and booster administration did not seem to impact the magnitude of the booster response. The results of this study show that active post-exposure immunisation with only one dose of inactivated vaccine confers high and long-term protection and effectively controls viral hepatitis A outbreaks.

Nemcová J, Nemecek V. · NRL pro virové hepatitidy, SZU, Praha. · Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol. · Pubmed #15807385 No free full text.

Abstract: Genotyping of hepatitis C virus (HCV) is of relevance to scheduling the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C (VHC), making their prognosis and monitoring the treatment efficacy. A set of 62 sera testing HCV RNA positive in Cobas Amplicor HCV 2.0 test (CA) were genotyped using Versant HCV Genotype Assay (LiPA) Bayer, i.e. the reverse hybridization method, with the CA amplified product being directly used in the assay. Fifty-six out of 57 samples reactive in reverse hybridization (92%) were genotyped. One sample showed a profile differing from any genotype, five samples were not reactive and one sample was not tested within this study design. Two out of five non-reactive sera and one non-tested serum could be genotyped by nested PCR based reverse hybridization. It can be concluded that the CA product resulting from one-step HCV RNA amplification is suitable for use in genotyping by reverse hybridization. The CA product based genotyping procedure is easier to perform, less time-consuming and less costly. The nested PCR based procedure could be used for typing of sera with lower HCV concentrations nontypeable with the combination of CA and Versant HCV Genotype Assay. Forty-eight selected samples were typed not only by reverse hybridization but also by a serological kit Murex HCV Serotyping 1-6 Assay (Abbot Murex). Thirty-seven (77%) of these sera, including all of three sera negative in reverse hybridization, appeared typeable by this kit. Although less sensitive, serotyping may be of relevance to typing of sera with low HCV levels or not containing detectable viral NA which are nontypeable by reverse hybridization. Thirty-three sera appeared genotypeable by both of the methods tested with the results being in good agreement. In two cases only the serotyping method revealed one more type of virus (mixed genotype) compared to the reverse hybridization.

Saláková M, Nemecek V, König J, Tachezy R. · Department of Experimental Virology, Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion, U Nemocnice 1, 128 20 Prague 2, Czech Republic. · BMC Infect Dis. · Pubmed #15575965 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: TT virus is prevalent worldwide, but its prevalence and genotype distribution in Central and East-Europe has not been determined. The high prevalence of TTV in multiply-transfused patients points to the importance of a parenteral mode of transmission, but since more than half of the general population is infected other possible routes of transmission must be considered. METHODS: In our study, we investigated the epidemiology, transmission and phylogeny of TTV in the Czech Republic. The following groups were selected: a control group of 196 blood donors, 20 patients with hemophilia, 49 intravenous drug users, 100 sex workers, 50 penitentiary prisoners, 208 healthy children aged 1 to 14 years, 54 cord blood samples, 52 patients with non-A-E hepatitis, 74 patients with hepatitis C, and 51 blood donors with increased ALT levels. Primers specific for the non-coding region were used. The genotype distribution was studied in 70 TTV-positive samples. RESULTS: The prevalence rate of TTV among the Czech population was 52.6%. We have shown that TTV is not transmitted prenatally. Children were infected after birth with two peaks: one at the age of two years and the other after the beginning of primary school. Adults have shown a further increase in the TTV prevalence with age. The highest TTV prevalence was found in the group of patients who had received multiple blood transfusions. The TTV prevalence rate in subjects at an increased risk of sexual transmission was not significantly higher than in the general population. Genotypes G2 and G1 were most prevalent among the Czech population, followed by G8 and G3. The subjects positive for markers of HBV and/or HCV infection tested significantly more often TTV DNA positive, which is suggestive of a common route of transmission of these three infections. CONCLUSIONS: This study on TTV prevalence, mode of transmission and age-specific prevalence is the most extensive study performed in Central and Eastern Europe. It showed insights into the epidemiology of TTV infection, but failed to associate TTV infection with clinical manifestations.

Nemecek V, Cástková J, Fritz P, Linhartová A, Svandová E, Srámová H, Kríz B. · Centre of Epidemiology and Microbiology, National Institute of Public Health, Prague, Czech Republic. · Cent Eur J Public Health. · Pubmed #15080261 No free full text.

Abstract: Within serological surveys 2001, prevalence of markers of hepatitis viruses A (anti-HAV), B (anti-HBc, HBsAg, anti-HBs) and for the first time also C (anti-HCV) was investigated. Sera were collected in 2001 and tested by respective kits AxSYM, Abbott. HAV: 2,623 sera were tested for the presence of anti-HAV antibodies. Comparison with serological surveys of 1984 and 1996 revealed again shifts of the age prevalence curve for anti-HAV antibodies towards higher age groups corresponding to time intervals between epidemiological surveys. High prevalence rates of anti-HAV antibodies (more than 20%) were only found for the population age groups who lived in the period of high incidence of VHA, i.e. up to 1965. The prevalence of anti-HAV antibodies increased by about 5-10% in the population under 20 years of age, the increase being significant and assumingly attributable to vaccination against VHA, and remained the same as in 1996 in the age group 20-29 years. HBV: 2,568 sera were tested for the presence of anti-HBc antibodies and 76 reactive specimens were further tested for the presence of HBsAg and anti-HBs antibodies. The prevalence of anti-HBc antibodies continuously increases with age. The total prevalence of anti-HBc antibodies calculated for the Czech population is 5.59% compared to 6.95% recorded in 1996. The calculated prevalence rate of HBsAg is 0.56% and that of anti-HBs antibodies is 3.99% for the non-vaccinee population. HCV: The prevalence rate of anti-HCV antibodies was 0.2% with 6 out of 2,950 sera testing positive. Age dependence could not be assessed because of the small number of positive persons. HCV infection is known to afflict high-risk groups, likely to escape a general serological survey, rather than the normal population.