Hepatitis: Maddrey WC

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 14 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Hepatitis," originating from Planet Earth —» Maddrey WC.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline International Autoimmune Hepatitis Group Report: review of criteria for diagnosis of autoimmune hepatitis. 1999

Alvarez F, Berg PA, Bianchi FB, Bianchi L, Burroughs AK, Cancado EL, Chapman RW, Cooksley WG, Czaja AJ, Desmet VJ, Donaldson PT, Eddleston AL, Fainboim L, Heathcote J, Homberg JC, Hoofnagle JH, Kakumu S, Krawitt EL, Mackay IR, MacSween RN, Maddrey WC, Manns MP, McFarlane IG, Meyer zum Büschenfelde KH, Zeniya M. · Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, London, UK. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #10580593 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

2 Review Drug-induced hepatotoxicity: 2005. 2005

Maddrey WC. · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, TX 75390-8570, USA. · J Clin Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15758665 No free full text.

Abstract: The removal from the marketplace of several widely prescribed drugs due to hepatotoxicity has attracted considerable attention. Now under extensive review are means by which we can better identify hepatic risk prior to federal approval. Assessment of risk-to-benefit ratios regarding a novel agent with hepatotoxicity issues (especially one for a life-threatening condition) requires considerable judgment and education on the part of prescribers and patients. The spectrum of drug-induced liver injury is broad with simulation of almost all unknown liver disorders. Drug-induced liver injuries often have a somewhat characteristic signature, as regards type of injury (hepatocellular vs cholestatic) and time of onset. The diagnosis of drug-induced liver injury is often one of exclusion with initial suspicion based on circumstantial evidence. Factors affecting susceptibility to drug-induced injury include age, sex, concomitant use of other drugs, and genetic polymorphism in metabolic pathways involved in activation or disposition of therapeutic drugs. Drug-drug interactions present particular problems in patients, often elderly, who are receiving several drugs simultaneously. Mechanisms of drug-induced liver injury are many and varied. With many drugs, intermediary products produced during metabolism are highly reactive and toxic. In these situations, the balance between the rate of production of the metabolite and the effectiveness of the drug may determine whether or not hepatic injury occurs.

3 Review Alcohol-induced liver disease. 2000

Maddrey WC. · Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas Medical Center at Dallas, Dallas, Texas, USA. · Clin Liver Dis. · Pubmed #11232180 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatic changes resulting from the regular ingestion of alcohol are many and include fat infiltration, alcoholic hepatitis, and cirrhosis. Only 10% to 15% of chronic alcoholics develop liver disease. Women are more susceptible. An area of considerable importance is the high prevalence of concomitant infection with hepatitis C virus in chronic alcoholics. Patients who have hepatitis C and alcohol-induced liver injury are much more likely to develop progressive liver disease and cirrhosis. Corticosteroid therapy has proven useful in the treatment of patients with severe acute alcoholic hepatitis.

4 Review Hepatitis B--an important public health issue. 2001

Maddrey WC. · Department of Internal Medicine, The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas 75390-8570, USA. · Clin Lab. · Pubmed #11214223 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases in the world. It has been estimated that 350 million people worldwide are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers. The global prevalence of chronic HBV infection varies widely, from high ( > 8%, e.g., Africa, Asia and the Western Pacific) to intermediate (2-7% e.g., Southern and Eastern Europe) and low (< 2%, e.g., Western Europe, North America and Australia). The predominant routes of transmission vary according to the endemicity of the HBV infection. In areas of high endemicity, perinatal transmission is the main route of transmission, whereas in areas of low endemicity, sexual contact amongst high-risk adults is predominant. Between one-third and one-quarter of people infected chronically with HBV are expected to develop progressive liver disease (including cirrhosis and primary liver cancer). Although mass vaccination programs have begun to control the spread of HBV infection, therapeutic intervention is the only option for those with established chronic HBV-associated liver disease. Until recently, the only treatment for chronic hepatitis B was the immune modulator, interferon (IFN) alpha. However, IFN alpha treatment has several disadvantages; it is expensive, it must be administered by injection, there are side-effects, and IFN alpha is poorly tolerated. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, is the first effective, and well tolerated, oral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. In conclusion, although we are still some way from eradicating or curing chronic hepatitis B, the advent of lamivudine allows new populations to benefit from therapy and helps to address the global public health problem of hepatitis B.

5 Review Update in hepatology. free! 2001

Maddrey WC. · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #11177335 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

6 Review Hepatitis B: an important public health issue. 2000

Maddrey WC. · Department of Internal Medicine, University of Texas, Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, USA. · J Med Virol. · Pubmed #10861647 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B is one of the most common infectious diseases in the world. It has been estimated that 350 million people world-wide are chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) carriers. The global prevalence of chronic HBV infection varies widely, from high (>/=8%, e.g., Africa, Asia and the Western Pacific) to intermediate (2-7% e.g., Southern and Eastern Europe) and low (<2%, e.g., Western Europe, North America and Australia). The predominant routes of transmission vary according to the endemicity of the HBV infection. In areas of high endemicity, perinatal transmission is the main route of transmission, whereas in areas of low endemicity, sexual contact amongst high-risk adults is the predominant route. Between one-third and one-quarter of people infected chronically with HBV are expected to develop progressive liver disease (including cirrhosis and primary liver cancer). Although mass vaccination programmes have begun to control the spread of HBV infection, therapeutic intervention is the only option for those with established chronic HBV-associated liver disease. Until recently, the only treatment for chronic hepatitis B was the immune modulator, interferon (IFN) alpha. IFN alpha treatment has several disadvantages; it is expensive, it must be administered by injection, there are side effects, and IFN alpha is poorly tolerated. Lamivudine, a nucleoside analogue, is the first effective, and well tolerated, oral treatment for chronic hepatitis B. In conclusion, although we are still some way from eradicating or curing chronic hepatitis B, the advent of lamivudine allows new populations to benefit from therapy and helps to address the global public health problem of hepatitis B.

7 Clinical Conference Adult hepatitis B vaccination using a novel triple antigen recombinant vaccine. 2001

Young MD, Schneider DL, Zuckerman AJ, Du W, Dickson B, Maddrey WC, Anonymous00139. · Medeva Group Development, Wayne, PA, USA. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #11481622 No free full text.

Abstract: Present hepatitis B vaccines use multidose prolonged regimens, which even healthcare workers at risk do not always complete. Moreover, when vaccination is completed there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. The protection of adults at risk could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Vaccine-naive adults were randomized to vaccination with either Engerix-B (SmithKline Biologicals, Rixensart, Belgium) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare; Medeva Pharma Plc, Speke, UK). The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of seroprotection 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 304 adults entered the study. Of these, 16 failed to complete the study (9 on Hepacare and 7 on Engerix-B). With the Engerix-B standard (0, 1, 6) regimen, 88% of subjects were protected by month 7, whereas with the triple antigen vaccine a 2-dose regimen (0, 1) provided equivalent protection (91%) within 6 months and a 3-dose (0, 1, 6) regimen was significantly superior (98% seroprotected by 7 months after starting vaccination P <.001). With adults at risk for a suboptimal response (i.e., older adults, the obese, men, and smokers) the triple antigen vaccine produced a greater degree of protection. The vaccines had similar safety profiles. Both vaccines were well tolerated. In healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine containing S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunologic response and was as effective as a 2- and 3-dose regimen.

8 Clinical Conference Comparison of a triple antigen and a single antigen recombinant vaccine for adult hepatitis B vaccination. 2001

Young MD, Gooch WM, Zuckerman AJ, Du W, Dickson B, Maddrey WC. · Medeva Group Development, Wayne, Pennsylvania 19087, USA. · J Med Virol. · Pubmed #11424117 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B and its sequelae are a major public health problem. Vaccines have been available for almost 20 years; however the disease still remains a global problem. Many factors contribute to the failure to control hepatitis B, including the limited nature of the vaccination programs implemented initially. Only relatively recently has mass childhood vaccination begun to be implemented and vaccination of high-risk groups, other than healthcare workers, is still not general policy. Additional factors contributing to continued persistence of hepatitis B in the developed world are that the present vaccines are not fully used by those recommended to be vaccinated and even when vaccination is carried out appropriately, there remain some who fail to achieve adequate protection. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups who have inadequate response to current vaccines, and those who are unwilling or unable to comply with protracted multi-dose vaccine regimens, could be improved if there were a more potent vaccine and/or a shorter vaccination regimen available. Adults who had never been vaccinated against hepatitis B were randomised to receive a vaccination course of either a present single antigen (S) vaccine (Recombivax-HB) or a novel triple antigen (S, pre-S1, and pre-S2) recombinant vaccine (Hepacare Medeva Pharma plc). Doses were given at baseline and 1 month and 6 months later. Hepatitis B surface antibody (anti-HBs) levels were measured at 2, 4, 6, and 7 months after beginning vaccination. The primary efficacy parameter was the degree of protection, measured as the percentage of subjects with anti-HBs titres > or = 10 IU/L, 6 or 7 months (26 +/- 2 weeks) after beginning vaccination. A total of 303 adult subjects entered the study and were vaccinated. Of these, 11 failed to complete the study (4 on Hepacare and 7 on Recombivax-HB); however all but 2 (1 to receive the triple antigen vaccine and 1 to receive Recombivax-HB) were included in the intent-to-treat population for efficacy evaluation. Treatment randomisation was stratified at entry based on age (above and below 40 years old) and gender. The standard three-dose/6-month vaccination regimen of the single antigen vaccine protected 83% of subjects by 7 months after starting vaccination whereas the triple antigen vaccine as a two-dose/1-month regimen protected 88% within 6 months and as a three-dose/6-month regimen protected 97% by 7 months after starting vaccination. Thus the protection rate provided by the shortened (0, 1) regimen of the novel vaccine was "essentially equivalent" (i.e., not statistically inferior) to that provided by the full (0, 1, and 6) regimen of today's vaccine (88% vs. 81%, P < 0.001), and the protection rate provided by a three-dose/6-month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of the new vaccine was significantly superior to that provided by present vaccines (97% vs. 83% P < 0.001). The percentage of subjects protected increases with time after beginning vaccination and at all time points up to and including 6 months was significantly greater with the two-dose regimen of the triple antigen vaccine than with the single antigen vaccine regimen. In adults at risk for a reduced response to hepatitis B vaccination [i.e., older adults (>/=40), the obese, males, and smokers], the triple antigen vaccine produced a significantly greater percentage of protected subjects (P < 0.001) and higher geometric mean titre (P < 0.001). Indeed as a three-dose/6 month regimen, the triple antigen vaccine raised the level of protection in these vulnerable subgroups to that seen when a single antigen vaccine is used in the optimal younger adult group. Both vaccines were well tolerated and had similar safety profiles. The most frequently (> or = 10%) reported adverse events with the use of either vaccine were pain at the site of injection (38% vs. 41% vs. 20% for the two-dose Hepacare regimen, the three-dose Hepacare regimen, and the three-dose Recombivax-HB regimen, respectively), infections at the site of injection (1% vs. 14% vs. 9%), headache (9% vs. 13% vs. 11%), and nausea (7% vs. 11% vs. 3%). It is concluded that in healthy normal adults, a triple antigen hepatitis B vaccine that contained S and pre-S antigens produced an enhanced immunological response. This was exemplified by the novel vaccine's ability to overcome factors such as advancing age (> or = 40 years), obesity, and smoking, each of which is known to reduce the potential for protection with present recombinant S only vaccines. A two-dose/1-month (0 and 1) regimen of this triple antigen vaccine was as effective as the standard three-dose/6 month (0, 1, and 6) regimen of present single antigen vaccines. (c) 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

9 Clinical Conference A multi-center controlled study of rapid hepatitis B vaccination using a novel triple antigen recombinant vaccine. 2001

Young MD, Rosenthal MH, Dickson B, Du W, Maddrey WC. · Medeva Group Development, 1265 Drummers Lane, Suite 300, Wayne, PA 19087, USA. · Vaccine. · Pubmed #11348708 No free full text.

Abstract: Hepatitis B vaccines have been available for 20 years, however, the disease still remains a global problem. Clearly, the protection of at-risk groups could be improved if a more potent vaccine with a shorter vaccination regimen were available. Hepacare is new recombinant vaccine, which contains three of the surface antigens of the HB virus and has higher immunogenicity than present single antigen (HBsAg only) vaccines. This study evaluates the potential for developing seroprotection rapidly and the viability of a 1 month/two dose regimen. A total of 400 adult subjects were vaccinated using either the present accelerated 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B or a 1 month/two dose regimen of a novel triple antigen vaccine (Hepacare). Both vaccines were well tolerated. Four weeks after a single dose, the seroprotective rates for Engerix-B and the triple antigen vaccine were 5 and 17%, respectively. By month 2, 4 weeks after two doses of vaccine, it was 38 and 61%. Finally by month 3, 4 weeks after a third dose of Engerix-B or placebo, respectively, the seroprotection rates were 71 and 82%. The geometric mean titres (GMTs), of these responders was then 119 and 120 IU/l, respectively. Both vaccines were well tolerated. At all points up to and including 3 months after beginning vaccination, the novel 1 month/two dose regimen of Hepacare was significantly more effective in producing seroporotective titres than the 2 month/three dose regimen of Engerix-B (P = 0.001).

10 Clinical Conference Safety of combination interferon alfa-2b/ribavirin therapy in chronic hepatitis C-relapsed and treatment-naive patients. 1999

Maddrey WC. · University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center at Dallas 75235-8570, USA. · Semin Liver Dis. · Pubmed #10349694 No free full text.

Abstract: The coadministration of ribavirin with recombinant interferon alfa-2b (rIFN-alpha 2b) compared with rIFN-alpha 2b alone markedly enhanced sustained virologic response rates in relapsed and treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C patients. The potential for ribavirin to likewise exacerbate the adverse events associated with the alpha interferons is reviewed. The overall safety and tolerability of combination rIFN-alpha 2b/ribavirin therapy was evaluated in 2,089 patients treated in phase III clinical studies conducted in the United States and internationally. Serious adverse events were also evaluated on an interim basis in > 25,000 patients--a majority of whom were treated with combination therapy (open label)--treated worldwide in investigator-initiated studies. Patients in the phase III studies received 3 million International Units rIFN-alpha 2b three times per week by subcutaneous injection plus either ribavirin or placebo orally in divided daily doses of 1,000 or 1,200 mg for patients weighing < or = 75 or > 75 kg, respectively. Adverse event frequency and severity and dose modifications were recorded throughout the 24-week (relapse) or 48-week (naive) treatment period and 24-week follow-up period. Clinically significant adverse events included anemia and depression. There was no evidence that the adverse effects of alpha interferon (e.g., fatigue, depression, neutropenia) were exacerbated by ribavirin. Severe adverse events were limited due to strict adherence to dose-modification criteria; approximately 6% to 9% of patients discontinued combination therapy because of an adverse event. Clinically serious adverse events, dose reductions and discontinuations, and potential mechanisms of toxicity associated with rIFN-alpha 2b and ribavirin are examined.

11 Article Hepatitis B virus infection in 6,130 unvaccinated Korean-Americans surveyed between 1988 and 1990. 2007

Hann HW, Hann RS, Maddrey WC. · Liver Disease Prevention Center, Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Jefferson Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #17397407 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: During the past decades, the influx of immigrants from hepatitis B virus (HBV) endemic regions has brought significant changes in the prevalence of HBV-associated liver diseases and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the United States. Our program, which was intended to identify those in need of hepatitis B vaccination, helped us to learn of the natural history of HBV infection in Korean Americans. METHODS: Between November of 1988 and May 1990, we screened 6,130 Korean Americans in the eastern United States for HBV infection. RESULTS: The overall hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) (+) rate was 6.1%, with 8.0% for males and 4.4% for females. The carrier rate peaked in subjects between the ages of 21 and 40 yr. The HBsAg (+) rate for 452 U.S.-born children was lower (2.7%) than that of 623 Korean-born (5.5%). None received hepatitis B immune-globulin or HBV vaccination. The vertical transmission rate was 30.3% in children born to HBsAg (+) mothers and 100% in those born to hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) positive mothers. In contrast, the paternal transmission rate was low; 10.3% in children with HBsAg (+) fathers and 19.2% in those with HBeAg (+) fathers. Another significant observation was the unexpected finding of ongoing liver diseases in incidentally identified carriers. Evaluation of 139 asymptomatic adult carriers revealed that 42% had elevated liver enzymes and 11% had already developed liver cirrhosis. CONCLUSION: These findings strongly suggest the need for active HBV screening of immigrants from endemic regions and, most importantly, the need for careful monitoring of the carriers.

12 Article Corticosteroids improve short-term survival in patients with severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH): individual data analysis of the last three randomized placebo controlled double blind trials of corticosteroids in severe AH. 2002

Mathurin P, Mendenhall CL, Carithers RL, Ramond MJ, Maddrey WC, Garstide P, Rueff B, Naveau S, Chaput JC, Poynard T. · Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #11943418 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Controversy surrounding the efficacy of corticosteroids in severe alcoholic hepatitis (AH) persists. The aims of our study were: (a) to analyze individual data of patients with severe AH discriminant function (DF)> or =32 from the last three randomized controlled trials; and (b) to identify the independent prognostic factors associated with short-term survival. METHODS: Individual data were collected from the three principal investigators. Survival analysis was performed at 28 days using the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test. The independent prognostic values were assessed by the proportional hazards regression model. RESULTS: About 102 placebo and 113 corticosteroid patients with DF > or =32 were analyzed. At 28 days, corticosteroid patients had significantly higher survival: 84.6+/-3.4% vs. 65.1+/-4.8%, P=0.001. In univariate analysis, corticosteroid treatment, age, DF, albumin, creatinine and encephalopathy were prognostic factors. In multivariate analysis, age (P=0.0001), serum creatinine (P<0.002) and corticosteroid treatment (P=0.002) were independent prognostic variables. A more dramatic decrease of median serum bilirubin values (micromol/l) was observed at 7 and 14 days in corticosteroid patients (P<0.05) : -76.5 vs. -35 and -105 vs. -45. CONCLUSIONS: Corticosteroids improved short-term survival of patients with severe AH. Age and serum creatinine are independent prognostic factors. Corticosteroids are recommended for patients with severe AH.

13 Article A model for a managed care education approach to increase hepatitis awareness: Part I. 2000

Schiff ER, Maddrey WC, Keeffe EB. · Division of Hepatology, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, USA. · Manag Care Interface. · Pubmed #11185177 No free full text.

Abstract: Morbidity and mortality associated with viral hepatitis, especially hepatitis C, are expected to increase rapidly over the next 2 decades. Many MCOs view hepatitis as a high-cost disease with a relatively low incidence; the incentive to develop education or awareness programs for hepatitis is correspondingly low. The American Gastroenterological Association, the American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, and the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases have, through the American Digestive Health Foundation, developed a unique, proactive, and flexible educational initiative for managed care. After providing an overview of hepatitis, this paper describes the four phases of this program designed to increase hepatitis awareness among managed care providers and members.

14 Article A model for a managed care education approach to increase hepatitis awareness: Part. II. 2000

Schiff ER, Maddrey WC, Keeffe EB. · Center for Liver Diseases, University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, USA. · Manag Care Interface. · Pubmed #11142966 No free full text.

Abstract: In last month's issue, the authors described a unique partnership that led to the development of an educational program on hepatitis C for managed health care plans. Part II and the conclusion addresses the implementation of the program in managed health plans.