Hepatitis: Berg T

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 121 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Hepatitis," originating from Planet Earth —» Berg T.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline The German guideline for the management of hepatitis B virus infection: short version. 2008

Cornberg M, Protzer U, Dollinger MM, Petersen J, Wedemeyer H, Berg T, Jilg W, Erhardt A, Wirth S, Schirmacher P, Fleig WE, Manns MP, Anonymous00064, Anonymous00065, Anonymous00066, Anonymous00067, Anonymous00068. · Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #18713127 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

2 Guideline Prophylaxis, diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection: the German guidelines for the management of HBV infection. 2007

Cornberg M, Protzer U, Dollinger MM, Petersen J, Wedemeyer H, Berg T, Jilg W, Erhardt A, Wirth S, Schirmacher P, Fleig WE, Manns MP. · Abteilung Gastroenterologie, Hepatologie und Endokrinologie, Medizinische Hochschule Hannover. · Z Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #18080231 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

3 Guideline [Prophylaxis, Diagnosis and Therapy of Hepatitis-B-Virus-(HBV-)Infection: upgrade of the guideline, AWMF-Register 021/011] 2007

Cornberg M, Protzer U, Dollinger MM, Petersen J, Wedemeyer H, Berg T, Jilg W, Erhardt A, Wirth S, Schirmacher P, Fleig WE, Manns MP. · Die Institutsangaben sind am Ende des Beitrags gelistet. · Z Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #17554641 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

4 Review Expert opinion on the treatment of patients with chronic hepatitis C. 2009

Zeuzem S, Berg T, Moeller B, Hinrichsen H, Mauss S, Wedemeyer H, Sarrazin C, Hueppe D, Zehnter E, Manns MP. · Zentrum der Inneren Medizin, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Frankfurt, Germany. · J Viral Hepat. · Pubmed #18761607 No free full text.

Abstract: The current preferred treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is combination therapy consisting of pegylated interferon alfa and ribavirin (RBV) for 24-48 weeks. Although this approach appears to be highly effective for patients with HCV genotypes 2 or 3, who have a sustained virological response (SVR) of approximately 80%, the treatment algorithm is less effective for patients with HCV genotype 1, as these patients have SVR rates of just 40-50%. In order to improve treatment outcomes, this article explores potential approaches for the optimization of treatment for patients with HCV genotype 1: considering shorter treatment periods for patients with a rapid virological response (RVR), increasing treatment periods for slow responders, and increasing RBV dose are all suggestions. Results from clinical trials suggest that approximately 20% of the HCV genotype 1-infected population are slow responders, and around 15% of all HCV genotype-1 infected patients could benefit from a shorter treatment duration without compromising the SVR rate. Interest has also focused on whether treatment duration could be individualized in some patients with genotype 2 and 3 infection. Here all the findings from recent studies are translated into practical advice, to help practitioners make evidence-based treatment decisions in everyday clinical practice. Although there are areas where currently available data do not provide conclusive evidence to suggest amending treatment approaches, there is clearly potential for individualized treatment in all aspects of hepatitis treatment in the future.

5 Review Tailored treatment for hepatitis C. 2008

Berg T. · Medical Department Hepatology and Gastroenterology, Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. <> · Clin Liver Dis. · Pubmed #18625426 No free full text.

Abstract: Considering the high number of global cases of hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection (around 175 million), effective, individualized, tailored treatment approaches are imperative. In this respect, defining patients according to their initial response profiles was shown to have great impact on choosing the optimal treatment duration. The application of new more sensitive HCV RNA tests may further help to improve treatment individualization. In spite of the many relevant studies conducted in the past and at present, however, this problem is far from being resolved. Generally, it can be said that the presence of a rapid virologic response is a significant predictor of favorable outcome and permits an abbreviated treatment period. In contrast, patients who have a slow response have a high risk for relapse but seem to profit from extending treatment duration. This viral kinetically driven approach to tailor treatment is generally applicable to all genotypes.

6 Review Optimizing outcomes in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 2 or 3. 2008

Berg T, Carosi G. · Charite Universitatsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. · Antivir Ther. · Pubmed #18432159 No free full text.

Abstract: On-treatment predictors of response could be useful in optimizing treatment for patients with hepatitis C virus (HCV) genotype 2 or 3. Early virological response (EVR) has limited value as a predictor of response in genotype 2 or 3 patients, as it is achieved by 97% of this population. However, rapid virological response (RVR) measured at week 4 is a strong predictor of sustained virological response (SVR) in this group, and patients achieving an RVR may be suitable candidates for shorter treatment durations. Several small studies investigating the efficacy of shortened treatment durations in this population have been published; however, differences in study design have made their collective interpretation difficult. We discuss these studies, followed by a comparison of the data from ACCELERATE, the largest, randomized trial carried out to investigate abbreviated therapy in genotype 2 and 3 patients. The data confirm that RVR, and its use alongside significant baseline predictors, can assist in optimizing therapy. Patients achieving an RVR have high SVR rates and might be candidates for shorter treatment duration, particularly those displaying a low viral load at baseline; however, the need to consider the increased rate of relapse versus the benefits of abbreviated therapy must also be considered. Conversely, in patients who do not achieve an RVR there is evidence to suggest they may benefit from intensified therapy (longer therapy and/or increased doses). As in genotype 1 and 4 patients, response-guided therapy aims to optimize treatment outcomes for individuals, without compromising SVR rates.

7 Review [Strategies for the prevention of hepatocellular carcinoma in the context of chronic viral hepatitis] 2008

Schott E, Bergk A, Berg T. · Med. Klinik m.S. Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité, CVK, Berlin. · Z Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #18188819 No free full text.

Abstract: Liver cirrhosis induced by HBV and HCV infections is the main risk factor for the development of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Therefore, prevention of chronic infection with hepatitis viruses and prevention of the development of cirrhosis are essential for the primary prevention of HCC. A consequent vaccination program for HBV is suitable to reduce the rate of infections and the HCC-associated mortality. Since no vaccine is available for HCV, the reduction of risky behaviour and the improvement of hygiene standards are the mainstays for prevention of HCV. An efficient antiviral therapy aimed at the durable suppression of the viral load reduces the risk of progression to cirrhosis and development of HCC in precirrhotic stages of chronic HBV or HCV infections. In cirrhotic patients, the risk of developing HCC remains elevated even if a sustained virological response is achieved, thus requiring further screening with the intention of the early detection of HCC. It is too early to judge whether virological nonresponders profit from continued antiviral therapy. Therefore, the early diagnosis of chronic HBV or HCV infection is the single most important factor for the prevention of HCC. Secondary prevention after surgical resection or local ablative therapy may reduce the frequency of late recurrence. Liver transplantation is today the most effective measure of secondary prevention for selected patients with HCC. Due to its antiproliferative effects, the immunosuppressive drug sirolimus may play a role for secondary prevention of HCC following transplantation.

8 Review [German guidelines on diagnosis and therapy of hepatitis B] 2007

Wedemeyer H, Cornberg M, Protzer U, Berg T, Dollinger MM. · Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany. · Dtsch Med Wochenschr. · Pubmed #17713890 No free full text.

Abstract: Therapeutic option for hepatitis B virus infection have significantly improved in recent years. Moreover, new insights in the natural history of hepatitis B required an update of current national guidelines. Therefore, the German network of competence on viral hepatitis (Hep-Net) has revised guidelines on diagnosis and treatment og HBV incetion in cooperation with the national societies for Gastroenterology, Pathology, Virology, and Pediatric Gastroenterology. Important alterations concern the indication for antiviral therapy considering an HBV viremia of 104 copies/ml (2000 IU/ml) as a critical level. Moreover, specific recommendations how to prevent and to treat antiviral drug resistance are given. Finally, the importance of HBV in the context of organ and bone marrow transplantation, treatment of coinfections and children and prophylaxis of HBV is covered.

9 Review Prevention of hepatitis B recurrence after liver transplantation. 2005

Seehofer D, Berg T. · Department of General, Visceral, and Transplantation Surgery, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum, Berlin, Germany. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #16286888 No free full text.

Abstract: The reults of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatitis B virus (HBV) related liver disease are significantly influenced by the HBV recurrence rate. Complete eradication of hepatitis B is rarely possible after liver transplantation and hepatic and extrahepatic reservoirs are a continuous latent source of HBV recurrence. Therefore an adequate prophylaxis is mandatory. By introduction of long term passive immunoprophylaxis the recurrence rate could be markedly reduced and survival rates significantly improved. Due to the approval of antiviral drugs, especially lamivudine as the first approved antiviral agent against HBV, new prophylactic options, including combination prophylaxis, have been introduced. This modern antiviral managemant improved the outcome of hepatitis B patients after liver transplantation. The Results after OLT are nowadays reported to be as good or in a recent UNOS database report even better than in non-HBV patients. The type of recommended prophylaxis has undergone modifications within the last years and is still subject to changes due to the ongoing development of antiviral agents. In addition, due to high costs of hepatitis immunoglobulin alternatives such as prophylaxis with nucleos(t)ide analogues or vaccination are increasingly investigated. In the following, current strategies of reinfection prophylaxis and future perspectives are reviewed.

10 Review Risk factors for the acquisition of hepatitis C. 2005

Bergk A, Berg T, Neumann UP. · Department of Medicine, Charité Medical Center, Virchow-Hospital, Medical School of the Humboldt-University, Berlin, Germany. · Minerva Gastroenterol Dietol. · Pubmed #15756143 No free full text.

Abstract: About 170 million people are estimated to be chronically infected with hepatitis C worldwide. Despite intense research efforts and considerable improvement of antiviral therapy sustained virological response can only be achieved in a minority of patients due to viral non-response or relapse, contraindications against therapy and high costs. Chronic hepatitis C is the leading cause for end-stage liver disease, hepatocellular carcinoma and liver transplantation in developed countries. To limit the incidence of new infections knowledge about potential transmission pathways and risk factors is crucial. This article aims to summarize recent advances in understanding transmission pathways and outlines future prevention strategies.

11 Review [Procedures for problematic situations with hepatitis B] 2004

Blum HE, Berg T, Tillmann HL, Von Weizsäcker F. · Albert-Ludwigs-Universität, Innere Abteilung II, Freiburg. · Z Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15314717 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

12 Clinical Conference Peginterferon alfa-2b and ribavirin: effective in patients with hepatitis C who failed interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy. 2009

Poynard T, Colombo M, Bruix J, Schiff E, Terg R, Flamm S, Moreno-Otero R, Carrilho F, Schmidt W, Berg T, McGarrity T, Heathcote EJ, Gonçales F, Diago M, Craxi A, Silva M, Bedossa P, Mukhopadhyay P, Griffel L, Burroughs M, Brass C, Albrecht J, Anonymous00084. · Service d'hepatologie, Université Pierre et Marie Curie Liver Center, Hôpital La Pitié Salpêtrière, Paris, France. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #19208349 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Treatment with peginterferon alfa and ribavirin produces a sustained virologic response (SVR) in approximately 60% of hepatitis C virus (HCV)-infected patients. Alternate options are needed for patients who relapse or do not respond to therapy. METHODS: This prospective, international, multicenter, open-label study evaluated efficacy and safety of peginterferon alfa-2b (1.5 microg/kg/wk) plus weight-based ribavirin (800-1400 mg/day) in 2333 chronic HCV-infected patients with significant fibrosis/cirrhosis whose previous interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy failed. Patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at treatment week (TW) 12 received 48 weeks of therapy; patients with detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 could enter maintenance studies at TW18; 188 patients with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12 continued therapy at the investigator's request. RESULTS: Overall, 22% of the patients attained SVR (56% with undetectable HCV-RNA and 12% with low/detectable HCV-RNA at TW12). SVR was better in relapsers (38%) than nonresponders (14%), regardless of previous treatment, and in patients previously treated with interferon-alfa/ribavirin (25%) than peginterferon alfa-ribavirin (17%). Predictors of response in patients with undetectable HCV-RNA at TW12 were genotype (2/3 vs 1, respectively; odds ratio [OR] 2.4; P < .0001), fibrosis score (F2 vs F4; OR, 2.2; F3 vs F4; OR, 1.7; P < .0001), and baseline viral load (< or =600,000 vs >600,000 IU/mL; OR, 1.4; P = .0223). These factors plus previous treatment and response were overall predictors of SVR. Safety was similar among fibrosis groups. CONCLUSIONS: Peginterferon alfa-2b plus weight-based ribavirin is effective and safe in patients who failed interferon alfa/ribavirin therapy. Genotype, baseline viral load, and fibrosis stage were predictors of response.

13 Clinical Conference Therapeutic vaccination of chronic hepatitis C nonresponder patients with the peptide vaccine IC41. 2008

Klade CS, Wedemeyer H, Berg T, Hinrichsen H, Cholewinska G, Zeuzem S, Blum H, Buschle M, Jelovcan S, Buerger V, Tauber E, Frisch J, Manns MP. · Intercell AG, Vienna, Austria. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #18471515 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: IC41 is a synthetic peptide vaccine containing 7 relevant hepatitis C virus (HCV) T-cell epitopes and the T helper cell (Th)1/Tc1 adjuvant poly-L-arginine. IC41 has been shown to be safe and to induce HCV-specific interferon (IFN)-gamma-secreting CD4+ and CD8+ T cells in healthy volunteers. We aimed to investigate whether IC41 is able to induce HCV-specific T-cell responses also in chronic hepatitis C patients. METHODS: Sixty HLA-A2-positive chronic HCV patients not responding to or relapsing from standard therapy were randomized in a double-blind phase II study into 5 groups to receive 6 vaccinations of IC41 (3 different dose groups), HCV peptides alone, or poly-L-arginine alone. RESULTS: IC41 was well tolerated, and no drug-related serious adverse events or induction of hepatitis were observed. T-cell proliferation was recorded in up to 67% of patients in the 3 IC41 vaccine groups but only in 17% of patients treated with peptides alone. IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay responses were observed exclusively in the IC41 groups with response rates up to 42%. There were 3 RNA responders with transient >1-log declines of HCV serum RNA associated with the strongest IFN-gamma enzyme-linked immunospot assay values within all 60 patients. CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that the HCV peptide vaccine IC41 can induce HCV-specific Th1/Tc1 responses in a subset of difficult to treat HCV nonresponder patients despite persisting viremia. However, changes in HCV RNA occurred only in single patients. Because strongest T-cell responses were associated with HCV RNA decline, further studies with optimized vaccine regimens and combination therapies have been initiated.

14 Clinical Conference Eltrombopag for thrombocytopenia in patients with cirrhosis associated with hepatitis C. free! 2007

McHutchison JG, Dusheiko G, Shiffman ML, Rodriguez-Torres M, Sigal S, Bourliere M, Berg T, Gordon SC, Campbell FM, Theodore D, Blackman N, Jenkins J, Afdhal NH, Anonymous00170. · Duke University and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27705, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #18046027 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Eltrombopag is a new, orally active thrombopoietin-receptor agonist that stimulates thrombopoiesis. We evaluated its ability to increase platelet counts and facilitate treatment for hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection in patients with thrombocytopenia associated with HCV-related cirrhosis. METHODS: Seventy-four patients with HCV-related cirrhosis and platelet counts of 20,000 to less than 70,000 per cubic millimeter were randomly assigned to receive eltrombopag (30, 50, or 75 mg daily) or placebo daily for 4 weeks. The primary end point was a platelet count of 100,000 per cubic millimeter or more at week 4. Peginterferon and ribavirin could then be initiated, with continuation of eltrombopag or placebo for 12 additional weeks. RESULTS: At week 4, platelet counts were increased to 100,000 per cubic millimeter or more in a dose-dependent manner among patients for whom these data were available: in 0 of the 17 patients receiving placebo, in 9 of 12 (75%) receiving 30 mg of eltrombopag, in 15 of 19 (79%) receiving 50 mg of eltrombopag, and in 20 of 21 (95%) receiving 75 mg of eltrombopag (P<0.001). Antiviral therapy was initiated in 49 patients (in 4 of 18 patients receiving placebo, 10 of 14 receiving 30 mg of eltrombopag, 14 of 19 receiving 50 mg of eltrombopag, and 21 of 23 receiving 75 mg of eltrombopag) while the administration of eltrombopag or placebo was continued. Twelve weeks of antiviral therapy, with concurrent receipt of eltrombopag or placebo, were completed by 36%, 53%, and 65% of patients receiving 30 mg, 50 mg, and 75 mg of eltrombopag, respectively, and by 6% of patients in the placebo group. The most common adverse event during the initial 4 weeks was headache; thereafter, the adverse events were those expected with interferon-based therapy. CONCLUSIONS: Eltrombopag therapy increases platelet counts in patients with thrombocytopenia due to HCV-related cirrhosis, thereby permitting the initiation of antiviral therapy. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00110799.)

15 Clinical Conference The GNB3 C825T polymorphism affects response to HCV therapy with pegylated interferon in HCV/HIV co-infected but not in HCV mono-infected patients. 2007

Ahlenstiel G, Nischalke HD, Bueren K, Berg T, Vogel M, Biermer M, Grünhage F, Sauerbruch T, Rockstroh J, Spengler U, Nattermann J. · Department of Internal Medicine I, University of Bonn, Sigmund-Freud-Street 25, 53105 Bonn, Germany. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #17559964 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Response to HCV treatment with pegylated interferon-alpha is variable but might at least in part depend on genetic host factors. The G protein beta3 unit (GNB3) C825T polymorphism has been shown to affect treatment response in HCV mono-infection. Here, we analyzed the impact of the GNB3 genotype in the context of HCV/HIV co-infection. METHODS: HIV/HCV co-infected (n=112) and HCV mono-infected patients (n=150), receiving therapy with pegylated IFN-alpha/ribavirin, were enrolled into this study. Furthermore, we analyzed 220 healthy and 92 HIV mono-infected patients. GNB3 genotype was defined and correlated with respect to treatment response. RESULTS: GNB3 genotype distribution differed significantly between HIV/HCV co-infected patients and HIV-positive/HCV-negative (p=0.0002) or healthy controls (p=0.03). Patients with a GNB3 CC genotype had significantly lower SVR rates as compared to carriers of a non-CC genotype (52% versus 77%; p=0.018). In a logistic regression analysis the GNB3 genotype and the HCV genotype were significantly associated with response to treatment (p=0.018). In contrast to HIV/HCV co-infected patients, GNB3 genotype did not affect response to treatment in HCV mono-infected patients. CONCLUSIONS: The GNB3 825 CC genotype is associated with poor SVR rates in HIV/HCV co-infected patients. This underlines the impact of genetic host factors for treatment response.

16 Clinical Conference Combination of tenofovir and lamivudine versus tenofovir after lamivudine failure for therapy of hepatitis B in HIV-coinfection. 2006

Schmutz G, Nelson M, Lutz T, Sheldon J, Bruno R, von Boemmel F, Hoffmann C, Rockstroh J, Stoehr A, Wolf E, Soriano V, Berger F, Berg T, Carlebach A, Schwarze-Zander C, Schürmann D, Jaeger H, Mauss S. · Center for HIV and Hepatogastroenterology, Grafenberger Allee 128a, 40237 Duesseldorf, Germany. · AIDS. · Pubmed #16988516 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: At present sequential monotherapy for chronic hepatitis B with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-polymerase inhibitors is clinical practice. It is unknown to date whether combination therapy with lamivudine plus tenofovir could be superior to sequential therapy with tenofovir after the occurrence of lamivudine resistance. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter, 1: 2 matched pair analysis comparing patients with HBV/HIV-coinfection starting an antiretroviral regimen including tenofovir plus lamivudine with patients who had highly replicative, lamivudine resistant HBe-antigen positive chronic hepatitis B and started with tenofovir as the only active HBV polymerase inhibitor subsequent to lamivudine. RESULTS: At baseline patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine (n = 25) had a median HBV DNA of 5.9 x 10(7) copies/ml compared to 1.37 x 10(8) copies/ml in the tenofovir arm (n = 50; P = 0.32). A sustained undetectable HBV DNA < 1000 copies/ml was achieved in 19/25 (76%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 42/50 (84%) on tenofovir (P = 0.53). A loss of HBe-antigen was observed in 9/25 (36%) patients on tenofovir plus lamivudine and in 12/50 (24%) patients on tenofovir (P = 0.29). HBs-antigen loss was found in 1/25 (4%) and 3/50 (6%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: In this cohort of HBV/HIV-coinfected individuals, full HBV DNA suppression was achieved in the majority of patients independent of treatment allocation. Loss of HBe- and HBs-antigen was not different between the two study arms. Over a median treatment period of 116 weeks tenofovir was as effective as tenofovir plus lamivudine. Longer treatment periods may be needed to evaluate potential benefits of first-line combination therapy for chronic hepatitis B.

17 Clinical Conference Treatment of patients with recurrent hepatitis C after liver transplantation with peginterferon alfa-2B plus ribavirin. 2006

Neumann U, Puhl G, Bahra M, Berg T, Langrehr JM, Neuhaus R, Neuhaus P. · Klinik für Allgemein-, Viszeral-, und Transplantationschirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany. · Transplantation. · Pubmed #16861940 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Recurrent hepatitis C virus (HCV) after liver transplantation (OLT) is a major cause of graft loss in HCV-positive patients. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa-2b (peginterferon) and ribavirin treatment for recurrent HCV after OLT and analyzed the influence of antiviral treatment on the histological course of recurrent hepatitis. METHODS: Twenty-five patients with recurrent HCV (genotype 1 n=20 and 2-4 n=5) received peginterferon (1 mg/kg/weekly) and ribavirin (600 mg) for 48 weeks. Viral load prior to treatment was below 1,000,000 (IU/ml) in 11 of 25 patients. Sustained antiviral response was defined as undetectable HCV-RNA in serum 6 months after stopping of therapy. All patients underwent liver biopsy prior to treatment and after 72 weeks. RESULTS: Seventeen of 25 patients became HCV-RNA-negative after treatment (68%). Sustained virologic response (SVR) was achieved in 9/25 (36%) patients. Liver specimen showed increase of fibrosis from 1.7 to 2.0 within 72 weeks. Side effects like neutropenia (60%) and anemia (36%) were treated with G-CSF, erythropoietin, and dose reduction of peginterferon and ribavirin. CONCLUSIONS: The use of peginterferon is safe and effective in patients with recurrent HCV. Treatment of side effects, especially neutropenia or anemia, helped to maintain antiviral therapy. Despite a viral response of 68% during treatment, the patients showed further progress of recurrent hepatitis in liver specimen.

18 Clinical Conference Early monotherapy with pegylated interferon alpha-2b for acute hepatitis C infection: the HEP-NET acute-HCV-II study. 2006

Wiegand J, Buggisch P, Boecher W, Zeuzem S, Gelbmann CM, Berg T, Kauffmann W, Kallinowski B, Cornberg M, Jaeckel E, Wedemeyer H, Manns MP, Anonymous00202. · Department of Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Endocrinology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #16440367 No free full text.

Abstract: Early treatment of acute hepatitis C with interferon alpha-2b for 24 weeks prevents chronic infection in almost all patients. Because pegylated interferons have replaced conventional interferon in the therapy of chronic hepatitis C, the aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy of an early treatment of acute hepatitis C with peginterferon alpha-2b. Between February 2001 and February 2004, 89 individuals with acute HCV infection were recruited at 53 different centers in Germany. Patients received 1.5 microg/kg peginterferon alpha-2b for 24 weeks; treatment was initiated after a median of 76 days after infection (range 14-150). End-of-treatment response and sustained virological response were defined as undetectable HCV RNA at the end of therapy and after 24 weeks of follow-up, respectively. In the total study population, virological response was 82% at the end of treatment and 71% at the end of follow-up. Of 89 individuals, 65 (73%) were adherent to therapy, receiving 80% of the interferon dosage within 80% of the scheduled treatment duration. End-of-treatment and sustained virological response rates in this subpopulation were 94% and 89%, respectively. A maximum alanine aminotransferase level of more than 500 U/L prior to therapy was the only factor associated with successful treatment. In conclusion, in acute HCV infection, early treatment with peginterferon alpha-2b leads to high virological response rates in individuals who are adherent to treatment. The high number of dropouts underlines the importance of thorough patient selection and close monitoring during therapy. Thus, future studies should identify factors predicting spontaneous viral clearance to avoid unnecessary therapy.

19 Clinical Conference Isatoribine, an agonist of TLR7, reduces plasma virus concentration in chronic hepatitis C infection. 2005

Horsmans Y, Berg T, Desager JP, Mueller T, Schott E, Fletcher SP, Steffy KR, Bauman LA, Kerr BM, Averett DR. · Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université Catholique de Louvain, Unit de Pharmacologie Clinique, Brussels, Belgium. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #16116638 No free full text.

Abstract: Immune-based therapy is the mainstay treatment for chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection but causes multiple side effects and achieves durable viral clearance in only approximately 50% of patients. Most new investigational anti-HCV compounds are direct-acting antivirals for which durability of response and risk of viral mutations and resistance are not yet known. Therefore, continuing discovery and development of new immune-based treatments is desirable. Toll-like receptors (TLRs) are pathogen recognition receptors that initiate the innate immune response. The responsiveness of HCV or other ongoing chronic systemic infections to treatment with a selective TLR agonist has not been reported. Isatoribine is a selective agonist of TLR7. In a proof-of-concept study, we found that once-daily 7-day treatment with intravenous isatoribine 800 mg caused a significant (P = .001) reduction of plasma HCV RNA (mean, -0.76; range, -2.85 to +0.21 log(10) units) in otherwise untreated patients (n = 12) who were chronically infected with HCV. Viral load reduction occurred in patients infected with genotype 1 as well as non-genotype 1 HCV. The reduction of viral load was correlated with induction of markers of a heightened immune antiviral state, including 2'-, 5'- oligoadenylate synthetase levels in whole blood. This treatment was well tolerated, with a low frequency of mild to moderate adverse events. In conclusion, systemic administration of the selective TLR7 agonist isatoribine resulted in dose-dependent changes in immunologic biomarkers and a statistically significant antiviral effect with relatively few and mild side effects.

20 Clinical Conference Peginterferon-alpha-2a (40KD) and ribavirin for 16 or 24 weeks in patients with genotype 2 or 3 chronic hepatitis C. 2005

von Wagner M, Huber M, Berg T, Hinrichsen H, Rasenack J, Heintges T, Bergk A, Bernsmeier C, Häussinger D, Herrmann E, Zeuzem S. · Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg/Saar, Germany. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #16083709 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Standard therapy of patients with chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infected with HCV genotype-2 or -3 is the combination of pegylated interferon-alpha and ribavirin for 24 weeks. Whether shorter treatment durations are possible for these patients without compromising sustained virologic response rates is unknown. METHODS: Patients chronically infected with HCV-2 (n = 39), HCV-2/3 (n = 1), or HCV-3 (n = 113) were treated with peginterferon-alpha-2a (180 microg/wk) plus ribavirin 800-1200 mg/day. HCV RNA was quantitatively assessed after 4 weeks. Patients with a rapid virologic response (HCV RNA below 600 IU/mL) were randomized for a total treatment duration of 16 (group A) or 24 weeks (group B). All patients with HCV RNA > or =600 IU/mL at week 4 (group C) were treated for 24 weeks. End-of-treatment and sustained virologic response were assessed by qualitative RT-PCR (sensitivity 50 IU/mL). RESULTS: Only 11 of 153 patients (7%) were allocated to group C. End-of-treatment and sustained virologic response rates were 94% and 82%, (group A), 85% and 80% (group B), and 73% and 36% (group C), respectively. In patients infected with genotype HCV-3 and high viral load (>800,000 IU/mL), a significant lower sustained virologic response rate was found than in patients infected with HCV-3 and a viral load lower or equal to 800,000 IU/mL (59% vs 85%, respectively; P = .003). CONCLUSIONS: In HCV-2 and -3 (low viral load)-infected patients who have a rapid virologic response, treatment for 16 weeks with peginterferon-alpha-2a and ribavirin is sufficient. In patients infected by HCV-3 (high viral load), longer treatment may be necessary.

21 Clinical Conference Peginterferon Alfa-2a, lamivudine, and the combination for HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B. free! 2005

Lau GK, Piratvisuth T, Luo KX, Marcellin P, Thongsawat S, Cooksley G, Gane E, Fried MW, Chow WC, Paik SW, Chang WY, Berg T, Flisiak R, McCloud P, Pluck N, Anonymous00057. · Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #15987917 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Current treatments for chronic hepatitis B are suboptimal. In the search for improved therapies, we compared the efficacy and safety of pegylated interferon alfa plus lamivudine, pegylated interferon alfa without lamivudine, and lamivudine alone for the treatment of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg)-positive chronic hepatitis B. METHODS: A total of 814 patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B received either peginterferon alfa-2a (180 microg once weekly) plus oral placebo, peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine (100 mg daily), or lamivudine alone. The majority of patients in the study were Asian (87 percent). Most patients were infected with hepatitis B virus (HBV) genotype B or C. Patients were treated for 48 weeks and followed for an additional 24 weeks. RESULTS: After 24 weeks of follow-up, significantly more patients who received peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy or peginterferon alfa-2a plus lamivudine than those who received lamivudine monotherapy had HBeAg seroconversion (32 percent vs. 19 percent [P<0.001] and 27 percent vs. 19 percent [P=0.02], respectively) or HBV DNA levels below 100,000 copies per milliliter (32 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.01] and 34 percent vs. 22 percent [P=0.003], respectively). Sixteen patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a (alone or in combination) had hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg) seroconversion, as compared with 0 in the group receiving lamivudine alone (P=0.001). The most common adverse events were those known to occur with therapies based on interferon alfa. Serious adverse events occurred in 4 percent, 6 percent, and 2 percent of patients receiving peginterferon alfa-2a monotherapy, combination therapy, and lamivudine monotherapy, respectively. Two patients receiving lamivudine monotherapy had irreversible liver failure after the cessation of treatment--one underwent liver transplantation, and the other died. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with HBeAg-positive chronic hepatitis B, peginterferon alfa-2a offers superior efficacy over lamivudine, on the basis of HBeAg seroconversion, HBV DNA suppression, and HBsAg seroconversion.

22 Clinical Conference Prevention of interferon-alpha associated depression in psychiatric risk patients with chronic hepatitis C. 2005

Schaefer M, Schwaiger M, Garkisch AS, Pich M, Hinzpeter A, Uebelhack R, Heinz A, van Boemmel F, Berg T. · Department of Psychiatry, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Schumannstr. 20/21, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #15885349 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha) induced depression is a major limitation for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C, especially for patients with psychiatric disorders. We prospectively studied the efficacy of a pre-emptive treatment with the antidepressant citalopram to prevent depression during hepatitis C treatment with pegylated IFN-alpha-2b plus ribavirin. METHODS: 14 HCV infected patients with psychiatric disorders received a prophylactic medication with citalopram (20mg/day) before and during therapy with IFN-alpha. The incidence of major depression was compared with 22 HCV infected patients with psychiatric disorders (group B; n=11) and without psychiatric risk factors (group C; n=11), who underwent IFN-alpha treatment without a pre-emptive antidepressant therapy. Depression was diagnosed by DSM-IV criteria. RESULTS: Pre-treatment of psychiatric patients with citalopram significantly reduced the incidence of major depression during the first 6 months of antiviral treatment as compared to the two control groups (group A 14% vs. 64% and 55% in group B and C; log-rank 6.89; df=2; P=0.032). Patients who developed symptoms of major depression during IFN therapy could also be improved by antidepressive treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Our open label pilot study, though small, clearly indicates that IFN alpha induced depression in psychiatric risk patients can be ameliorated by both the use of antidepressants as well as by intensive psychiatric care. However, larger, double blind placebo controlled trials in other patient populations are required to confirm these preliminary findings.

23 Clinical Conference Comparison of adefovir and tenofovir in the treatment of lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus infection. 2004

van Bömmel F, Wünsche T, Mauss S, Reinke P, Bergk A, Schürmann D, Wiedenmann B, Berg T. · Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Charité, Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow, Berlin, Germany. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #15565615 No free full text.

Abstract: Adefovir dipivoxil was recently approved for the treatment of wild-type and lamivudine-resistant hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection. Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, a congender of adefovir that is used in the treatment of HIV infected patients, has recently been shown to also be effective in patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection. We therefore compared the two substances in a study of 53 patients defined by high HBV DNA (>6 log10 copies/mL) levels and genotypic evidence of lamivudine resistance. Thirty-five patients received tenofovir for 72 to 130 weeks, and 18 received adefovir for 60 to 80 weeks. Changes in HBV DNA levels were followed for the complete period of 48 weeks. Early viral kinetics were compared on matched subgroups of 5 patients each. Individually, all tenofovir-treated patients showed a strong and early suppression of HBV DNA within a few weeks whether they were coinfected with HIV or were without comorbidity. In contrast, considerable individual variations in HBV DNA decline were observed in the adefovir group. Thus at week 48, only 44% of these patients had HBV DNA levels below 10(5) copies/mL in contrast to 100% of the tenofovir-treated patients (P = .001). No severe side effects were noticed in either group. No evidence of phenotypic viral resistance could be demonstrated in the tenofovir-treated patients in the long term (up to 130 weeks). In conclusion, tenofovir may become an effective alternative for the treatment of patients with lamivudine-resistant HBV infection.

24 Clinical Conference Randomized, controlled trial with IFN-alpha combined with ribavirin with and without amantadine sulphate in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C. 2003

Teuber G, Pascu M, Berg T, Lafrenz M, Pausch J, Kullmann F, Ramadori G, Arnold R, Weidenbach H, Musch E, Junge U, Wiedmann KH, Herrmann E, Zankel M, Zeuzem S. · Medizinische Klinik II, Klinikum der Johann Wolfgang Goethe-Universität, Theodor-Stern Kai 7, D-60590 Frankfurt/M, Germany. · J Hepatol. · Pubmed #12971972 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND/AIMS: Efficacy and safety of interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha)/ribavirin retreatment with or without amantadine sulphate were evaluated in non-responders with chronic hepatitis C. METHODS: Two hundred twenty five consecutive non-responders to previous antiviral treatment(s) with IFN-alpha alone or in combination with ribavirin or amantadine were treated with IFN-alpha 2b 5 MU daily for 4 weeks, 5 MU tiw for 20 weeks, followed by 3 MU tiw for additional 24 weeks combined with ribavirin 1000-1200 mg/d. One hundred fifteen of 225 patients were randomized to receive amantadine sulphate 100 mg bid for 48 weeks. Treatment was discontinued in patients with detectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV)-RNA at treatment week 24. RESULTS: An overall sustained virologic response with undectable serum HCV-RNA levels was observed in 49/225 patients (22%). Patients infected with HCV-genotype non-1 (P<0.001), low viremia (P=0.011) and only one previous antiviral treatment (P=0.032) were more likely to respond to antiviral retreatment. There was a trend towards higher sustained virologic response rates in patients receiving triple retreatment compared with those treated with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone (25 versus 18%, P=0.172). CONCLUSIONS: The addition of amantadine was well tolerated and led to an improvement of sustained virologic responses compared with retreatment with IFN-alpha/ribavirin alone, in particular in patients with low baseline viremia.

25 Clinical Conference Triple therapy with amantadine in treatment-naive patients with chronic hepatitis C: a placebo-controlled trial. 2003

Berg T, Kronenberger B, Hinrichsen H, Gerlach T, Buggisch P, Herrmann E, Spengler U, Goeser T, Nasser S, Wursthorn K, Pape GR, Hopf U, Zeuzem S. · Medizinische Klinik mit Schwerpunkt Hepatologie und Gastroenterologie, Universitätsklinikum Charité, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Humboldt-Universität, Berlin, Germany. · Hepatology. · Pubmed #12774015 No free full text.

Abstract: The antiviral efficacy of amantadine in patients with chronic hepatitis C is controversial. In this randomized, prospective, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial, triple therapy with interferon alfa (IFN-alpha)-2a plus ribavirin and amantadine (amantadine group) was compared with combination therapy IFN-alpha plus ribavirin (control group). Four hundred previously untreated patients with histologically proven chronic hepatitis C were randomly allocated to treatment with amantadine sulphate (100 mg twice daily orally) or a matched placebo together with IFN-alpha induction plus ribavirin (1,000-1,200 mg/day orally) for 48 weeks. The primary end point was sustained virologic response (SVR) defined as undetectable serum hepatitis C virus (HCV) RNA (<100 copies/mL) 24 weeks after the end of treatment. SVR was observed in 52% of the amantadine group and in 43.5% of the control group (P =.11). Among patients with HCV genotype 1 infection, the corresponding SVR rates were 39% and 31%, respectively. The virologic on-treatment response rate in week 24 was significantly higher in the amantadine group as compared with the control group (70% vs. 59%, respectively, P =.016). This beneficial effect was mainly related to HCV type 1-infected patients (63% vs. 47%, respectively, P =.012). Independent factors associated with SVR, according to multiple logistic regression analysis, were amantadine treatment, low baseline HCV RNA, platelet counts (>/=250/nL), pretreatment ALT quotient >/=3, and GGT level (<28 U/L) as well as HCV genotypes other than 1. In conclusion, although we could not demonstrate a significant advantage of the triple regimen in univariate analysis, multivariate analysis offers arguments that amantadine should be considered as a potential anti-HCV drug in future studies.


Next