| 1 |
Guideline [Multicomponent therapy for treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome] 2008
Arnold B, Häuser W, Bernardy K, Brückle W, Friedel E, Köllner V, Kühn-Becker H, Richter M, Weigl M, Weiss T, Offenbächer M. · Abteilung für Schmerztherapie, Klinikum Dachau, Krankenhausstr. 15, 85221, Dachau. · Schmerz. · Pubmed #18463898 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: A guideline for the treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS) was developed in cooperation with 10 German medical and psychological associations and 2 patient self-help groups. METHODS: A systematic literature search including all controlled studies evaluating multicomponent therapy (MT) was performed in the Cochrane Library (1993-12/2006), Medline (1980-12/2006), PsychInfo (1966-12/2006) and Scopus (1980-12/2006). Levels of evidence were assigned according to the classification system of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. Grading of the strengths of recommendations was done according to the German program for disease management guidelines. Standardized procedures to reach a consensus on recommendations were used. RESULTS: MT is superior to control groups or routine treatment (evidence level 1A) and should be offered to FMS patients (recommendation strength A). CONCLUSIONS: Future studies should consider medication, other co-therapies and comorbidities. MT programs tailored to FMS subgroups should be tested.
|
| 2 |
Article Efficacy of multicomponent treatment in fibromyalgia syndrome: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials. 2009
Häuser W, Bernardy K, Arnold B, Offenbächer M, Schiltenwolf M. · Klinikum Saarbrücken, Saarbrücken, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #19177530 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the efficacy of multicomponent treatment of fibromyalgia syndrome (FMS). METHODS: We screened Medline, PsychINFO, Scopus, and the Cochrane Library (through December 2007), as well as reference sections of original studies, reviews, and evidence-based guidelines. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the multicomponent treatment (at least 1 educational or other psychological therapy with at least 1 exercise therapy) of FMS were analyzed. RESULTS: We included 9 (of 14) RCTs with 1,119 subjects (median treatment time 24 hours) in the meta-analysis. Effects were summarized using standardized mean differences (SMDs) or weighted mean differences (WMDs). There was strong evidence that multicomponent treatment reduces pain (SMD -0.37; 95% confidence interval [95% CI] -0.62, -0.13), fatigue (WMD -0.85; 95% CI -1.50, -0.20), depressive symptoms (SMD -0.67; 95% CI -1.08, -0.26), and limitations to health-related quality of life (HRQOL) (SMD -0.59; 95% CI -0.90, -0.27) and improves self-efficacy pain (SMD 0.54; 95% CI 0.26, 0.82) and physical fitness (SMD 0.30; 95% CI 0.02, 0.57) at posttreatment. There was no evidence of its efficacy on pain, fatigue, sleep disturbances, depressive symptoms, HRQOL, or self-efficacy pain in the long term. There was strong evidence that positive effects on physical fitness (SMD 0.30; 95% CI 0.09, 0.51) can be maintained in the long term (median followup 7 months). CONCLUSIONS: There is strong evidence that multicomponent treatment has beneficial short-term effects on the key symptoms of FMS. Strategies to maintain the benefits of multicomponent treatment in the long term need to be developed.
|
| 3 |
Article [Fibromyalgia -- a somatoform (pain) disorder?] 2006
Häuser W, Bernardy K, Arnold B. · Zentrum für Schmerztherapie/Medizinische Klinik I, Klinikum Saarbrücken. · Schmerz. · Pubmed #15806384 No free full text.
Abstract: The hypothesis that fibromyalgia (FM) should be classified as a somatoform disorder was assessed by reviewing current clinical studies. According to the ICD-10, somatic illness beliefs of the patient, high health care utilization, and frustrating patient-doctor relationships are diagnostic criteria of somatoform disorders. For the diagnosis of a somatoform pain disorder, a temporal association between the manifestation of pain and emotional or psychosocial conflicts and the exclusion of a depressive disorder are additionally required. Empirical studies demonstrate a higher lifetime and current prevalence of psychiatric disorders, childhood adversities, life events, and daily hassles and a higher health care utilization of FM patients. Studies also reveal that most patients believe that both somatic and psychosocial factors have caused their disorder. The patient-doctor relationship is characterized to be disappointing for both. Yet in all studies there were patients who did not fulfill the ICD-10 criteria of a somatoform (pain) disorder. A biopsychosocial model of FM differentiating between biological as well as psychosocial predisposing, triggering, and perpetuating factors in the pathogenesis of FM is presented as an alternative model. Hopefully the biopsychosocial model and the distinction of subgroups will enable more differentiated and tailored psychotherapeutic and pharmacological treatment strategies.
|
|
|