Chronic Fatigue Syndrome: Stubhaug B

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 2 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Fatigue Syndrome, Chronic," originating from Planet Earth —» Stubhaug B.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Editorial [Treatment of chronic fatigue syndrome] free! 2009

Stubhaug B. · No affiliation provided · Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. · Pubmed #19521441 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

2 Article Cognitive-behavioural therapy v. mirtazapine for chronic fatigue and neurasthenia: randomised placebo-controlled trial. free! 2008

Stubhaug B, Lie SA, Ursin H, Eriksen HR. · Division of Psychiatry, Haukeland University Hospital, N-5021 Bergen, Norway. · Br J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #18310583 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Single interventions in chronic fatigue syndrome have shown only limited effectiveness, with few studies of comprehensive treatment programmes. AIMS: To examine the effect of a comprehensive cognitive-behavioural treatment (CCBT) programme compared with placebo-controlled mirtazapine medication in patients with chronic fatigue, and to study the effect of combined medication and CCBT. METHOD: A three-armed randomised clinical trial of mirtazapine, placebo and a CCBT programme was conducted to investigate treatment effect in a patient group (n=72) with chronic fatigue referred to a specialist clinic. The CCBT programme was compared with mirtazapine or placebo therapy for 12 weeks, followed by 12 weeks treatment with a mixed crossover-combination design. Assessments were done at 12 weeks and 24 weeks. RESULTS: By 12 weeks the treatment effect was significantly better in the group initially receiving CCBT, as assessed with the Fatigue Scale (P=0.014) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.001). By 24 weeks the treatment group initially receiving CCBT for 12 weeks followed by mirtazapine for 12 weeks showed significant improvement compared with the other treatment groups on the Fatigue Scale (P<0.001) and the Clinical Global Impression Scale (P=0.002). Secondary outcome measures showed overall improvement with no significant difference between treatment groups. CONCLUSIONS: Multimodal interventions may have positive treatment effects in chronic fatigue syndrome. Sequence of interventions seem to be of importance.