Depression: Bschor T

Bauer M, Bschor T, Pfennig A, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Versiani M, Möller HJ, Anonymous00106. · University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #17455102 No free full text.

Abstract: These practical guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care settings were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). They embody the results of a systematic review of all available clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders and offer practical recommendations for general practitioners encountering patients with these conditions. The guidelines cover disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of unipolar depressive disorders, and the principles of management in the acute, continuation and maintenance phase. They deal primarily with biological treatment (including antidepressants, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy).

Bschor T, Lewitzka U, Pfennig A, Bauer M. · Abteilung für Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Jüdisches Krankenhaus Berlin, Heinz-Galinski-Strasse 1, 13347 Berlin. · Nervenarzt. · Pubmed #17458527 No free full text.

Abstract: Twenty-five years ago the research group of the Canadian psychiatrist de Montigny reported treating antidepressant-refractory depressive patients successfully by adding lithium to their antidepressant. The report, published in 1981 as an open-label uncontrolled observation of only eight patients, falls short of today's methodological standards, but the treatment method, subsequently known as lithium augmentation, nonetheless was to change profoundly the pharmacological strategies for depressive disorders. The story of its development is remarkable, starting with a strictly theoretical idea conceived by Montigny and his colleagues after animal experiments in the 1970s had revealed that pretreatment with an antidepressant over several weeks led to sensitization of central nervous serotonin receptors. The team postulated that the proserotonergic characteristics of lithium, which had been systematically used as a psychotropic drug since 1949, could thus be used specifically to stimulate these receptors. Lithium augmentation demonstrated its effectiveness in the 1980s and 1990s, first in open-label and later in randomized and placebo-controlled studies. In the late 1990s studies aimed at optimizing its clinical application indicated that lithium augmentation must be administered for at least 2 weeks, with lithium serum levels within the range established for prophylactic treatment and assuming patient response, and that the combination of lithium and antidepressant must be continued as a maintenance therapy for 6 to 12 months. Research has yet to clarify how lithium augmentation actually works. Current results show that in addition to the idea postulated by Montigny, lithium could also have an activating effect on the cortisol axis. Thanks to the sound body of evidence which has accrued in the meantime, lithium augmentation is recommended in most guidelines and treatment algorithms as a main strategy for patients who do not respond to antidepressant monotherapy.

Grunze H, Adli M, Bauer M, Berger M, Bergmann A, Bräunig P, Bschor T, Falkai P, Gastpar M, Greil W, Kasper S, Krüger S, Laux G, Müller WE, Naber D, Walden J. · Psychiatrische Klinik LMU, München. · Fortschr Neurol Psychiatr. · Pubmed #17427043 No free full text.

Abstract: During recent years valproate has been established as a cornerstone for the drug-treatment of bipolar disorder. In Germany, valproate was licensed both for the treatment of acute mania and for maintenance treatment in summer 2005. At this occasion, this review summarises the scientific evidence and clinical experience of well-known experts with valproate-treatment. It was concluded that valproate will continue to be of high clinical significance despite the recent increase of treatment alternatives, both in monotherapy and combination treatment of acute mania, mixed states and maintenance treatment.

Bschor T, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Jewish Hospital Berlin, Heinz-Galinski-Str. 1, D-13347 Berlin, Germany. · Curr Pharm Des. · Pubmed #16918427 No free full text.

Abstract: Lithium augmentation refers to the addition of lithium to an antidepressant in the acute treatment phase of patients with depressive episodes who have failed to respond satisfactorily to treatment with antidepressant monotherapy. This article reviews the clinical evidence and hypotheses on the mode of action of lithium augmentation. For this purpose, studies were identified by searching Medline and by scanning the references of published reviews and standard textbooks. With regard to efficacy, 28 prospective studies (with a total of 838 depressed patients) were identified. The majority of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated substantial efficacy of lithium augmentation. A recent meta-analysis including only double-blind, placebo-controlled trials (N = 9) provided firm evidence that lithium augmentation has a statistically significant effect on response rate compared to placebo, and showed that lithium augmentation should be administered for at least 2 weeks to allow assessment of the patient's response. A recent double-blind, placebo-controlled trial revealed that responders to lithium augmentation should be maintained on the lithium-antidepressant combination for a minimum of 12 months. From animal studies there is robust evidence that lithium augmentation increases serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission, possibly through a synergistic action of lithium and the antidepressant on brain 5-HT pathways. Neuroendocrine studies in humans on the effects of lithium augmentation on the HPA system showed an unexpected and marked increase in the ACTH and cortisol response in the combined dexamethasone/CRH test. These results are in contrast to the established decline of HPA system activity during treatment with antidepressants. In conclusion, lithium is the foremost and most well-documented augmentation strategy in refractory depression. In international treatment guidelines and algorithms, lithium augmentation is considered a first-line treatment strategy for patients with a major depressive episode who do not adequately respond to standard antidepressant treatment.

Bschor T, Lewitzka U, Sasse J, Adli M, Köberle U, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · Pharmacopsychiatry. · Pubmed #14677084 No free full text.

Abstract: For now more than 50 years, lithium has been the gold standard for the pharmacologic treatment of bipolar disorder. However, its utility is not restricted to acute mania and prophylactic treatment of bipolar disorder. A relatively new indication for its use is the addition to an antidepressant in the acute treatment phase of unipolar major depression. To date, this treatment approach called lithium augmentation is the best-documented approach in the treatment of refractory depression. In international treatment guidelines and algorithms, lithium augmentation is considered a first-line treatment strategy for patients with a major depressive episode who do not adequately respond to standard antidepressant treatment. In a recent double-blind, placebo-controlled trial, lithium augmentation has demonstrated to also be effective in the continuation treatment phase to prevent early relapses. From animal studies there is robust evidence that lithium augmentation increases serotonin (5-HT) neurotransmission, possibly by a synergistic action of lithium and the antidepressant on brain 5-HT pathways. In contrast to the established decline of HPA system activity during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants, neuroendocrine studies on the effects of lithium augmentation on the HPA system showed an unexpected and marked increase in the ACTH and cortisol response in the combined DEX/CRH test. Here we review new data on the efficacy and mechanism of action of lithium augmentation.

Bauer M, Adli M, Baethge C, Berghöfer A, Sasse J, Heinz A, Bschor T. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité University Hospital, Humboldt-University at Berlin, Schumannstr. 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Can J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12971013 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This systematic review examines the evidence and discusses the clinical relevance of lithium augmentation as a treatment strategy for refractory major depressive episodes. It also examines hypotheses on the mode of action of lithium augmentation, with a focus on serotonin (5-HT) and neuroendocrine systems, and proposes recommendations for future research. METHOD: We searched the Medline computer database and the Cochrane Library for relevant original studies published in English from January 1966 to February 2003. The key words were as follows: lithium, augmentation strategies, lithium augmentation, major depression, refractory depression, treatment-resistant depression, neuroendocrinology, and serotonin. RESULTS: Of 27 prospective clinical studies published since 1981, 10 were double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 4 were randomized comparator trials, and 13 were open-label trials. Five of 9 acute-phase placebo-controlled trials demonstrated that lithium augmentation had substantial efficacy. In the acute-treatment trials, the average response rate in the lithium group was 45%, and in the placebo group, 18% (P < 0.001). One placebo-controlled trial showed the efficacy of lithium augmentation in the continuation-phase treatment. Summarizing the open and controlled data, approximately 50% of patients responded to lithium augmentation within 2 to 6 weeks. Animal studies offer robust evidence that lithium augmentation increases 5-HT neurotransmission, possibly by a synergistic action of lithium and the antidepressant on brain 5-HT pathways. CONCLUSIONS: Augmentation of antidepressants with lithium is the best-documented augmentation therapy in the treatment of refractory depression. Emerging data from animal studies suggest that the 5-HTergic system is involved in the augmentatory effect of lithium.

Bauer M, Forsthoff A, Baethge C, Adli M, Berghöfer A, Döpfmer S, Bschor T. · Klinik fur Psychiatrie und Psychotherapie, Charite Campus Mitte Humboldt-Universitat zu Berlin, Schumannstr. 20-21, 10117, Berlin, Germany, · Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #12904977 No free full text.

Abstract: Lithium has been used to augment the efficacy of antidepressant medications for more than 20 years. The present study examines whether evidence exists to support the clinical efficacy of lithium augmentation in refractory, treatment resistant depression. Studies were identified by searching Medline (1980 to August 2002) and by scanning the references of published reviews and standard textbooks. Studies were selected if they were open-labeled or double-blind, placebo-controlled or comparator trials that involved patients who had not responded to conventional antidepressants. 27 prospective studies were identified that included a total of 803 depressed patients displaying the following designs: 10 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials, 2 randomized, double-blind comparator trials, 2 randomized, open comparator trials, and 13 open-label trials. The majority of randomized controlled trials has demonstrated substantial efficacy of lithium augmentation in partial and non responders to antidepressant treatment. In the placebo-controlled trials, the response rate in the lithium group was 45% and in the placebo group 18% (p<0.001). Summarizing all open and controlled studies, approximately 50% of patients responded to lithium augmentation within 4 weeks. In conclusion, lithium is the foremost and most well-documented augmentation strategy in refractory depression.Therefore, it should be considered a first-line treatment strategy in patients with major depression who do not adequately respond to standard antidepressants.

Baethge C, Gruschka P, Smolka MN, Berghöfer A, Bschor T, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Bauer M. · Consolidated Department of Psychiatry, Harvard Medical School, the Bipolar and Psychotic Disorders Program, McLean Division of Massachusetts General Hospital, Belmont, Mass 02478-9106, USA. · J Psychiatry Neurosci. · Pubmed #14517579 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of lithium prophylaxis in unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) and to identify predictors of outcome including comedication. METHODS: In this long-term naturalistic study, clinical data from 55 patients with MDD (DSM-III-R) were collected prospectively in an outpatient clinic specializing in the treatment of affective disorders. OUTCOME MEASURES: Change in hospital admission rate (number and duration) during prophylaxis compared with the period before prophylaxis, Morbidity-Index during prophylaxis and time to first recurrence after initiation of lithium treatment. RESULTS: During an average follow-up period of 6.7 years, a significant decline in the number of days spent in hospital (p<0.001; 52 d/yr less; 95; CI 31-73 d) and a low Morbidity-Index (mean 0.07) was observed. Only in 6 patients did medication have to be changed because of side-effects (n=4) or a lack of efficacy (n=2). None of the independent variables we analyzed proved to be important in predicting the outcome of lithium prophylaxis. Comedication was necessary in 21 patients. The overall outcome of their prophylactic treatment, however, did not differ from the group that did not receive comedication in the symptom-free intervals. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study, with its long observation period and the inclusion of comedication as a confounding variable, indicate that lithium is a potent prophylactic agent for unipolar MDD in a naturalistic setting. In contrast to the findings of others, age was not associated with the outcome of prophylaxis, and latency did not predict outcome. Contrary to doubts that have been raised in recent years with regard to the effectiveness of lithium in everyday clinical practice, lithium appears to be a safe and potent alternative to antidepressants.

Bschor T, Baethge C, Adli M, Eichmann U, Ising M, Uhr M, Modell S, Künzel H, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstrasse 74, D-01307, Dresden, Germany. · J Psychiatr Res. · Pubmed #12842167 No free full text.

Abstract: Although lithium augmentation is the foremost and most well-documented treatment strategy for treatment resistant depression, knowledge of factors related to response remains scanty. Findings with the combined dexamethasone/corticotropin-releasing hormone (DEX/CRH) test are associated with response to treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant. This study investigated the potential predictive value of the DEX/CRH test for lithium augmentation response in major depressive disorder. The DEX/CRH test was conducted prior to lithium augmentation in 30 patients with a major depressive episode who had not responded to an antidepressant monotherapy trial of at least 4 weeks. Response status was assessed weekly using the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. For multivariate prediction, a logistic regression analysis was performed. Eleven (37%) patients responded to lithium augmentation within 4 weeks. Responders showed higher ACTH response and lower cortisol response in the DEX/CRH test, but results were not statistically significant. However, non-responders had a statistically significant higher cortisol/ACTH peak ratio (3.43+/-1.75) compared to responders (2.18+/-1.38) (P=0.027). This ratio is an indicator for the sensitivity of the adrenal cortex to ACTH. A cortisol/ACTH peak ratio of 1.8 was identified as the best cutoff point to differentiate responders from non-responders. In conclusion, results suggest a more sensitive adrenal cortex in non-responders to lithium augmentation. The findings would be in line with the assumption of a more chronic course of depression with more pronounced biological alterations in the non-responder group, because chronic depression is known to cause enlargement of the adrenal gland with a subsequent hypersensitivity to ACTH. Results of this study should be confirmed in a larger study group.

Bschor T, Baethge C, Adli M, Eichmann U, Ising M, Uhr M, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Germany. · Depress Anxiety. · Pubmed #12577277 No free full text.

Abstract: Although considerable evidence exists on the efficacy of lithium as an augmenting agent in refractory depression, the underlying neurobiology of this phenomenon is unknown. In patients with major depression, changes of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system have been detected by means of the dexamethasone suppression test (DST), when administered during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants. We investigated whether the DST also reveals alterations of the HPA system during lithium augmentation. We also sought to identify whether response to lithium augmentation can be predicted with the DST. Twenty-five patients with unipolar major depression, who did not respond to an adequate antidepressant monotherapy of at least 4 weeks, were measured for basal (pre-dexamethasone, 0800h) cortisol and ACTH levels and were administered the DST the day before initiation of lithium augmentation treatment. The same neuroendocrine procedures were repeated after 3 to 4 weeks. Criteria of response to lithium augmentation, defined as a reduction of the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS17) score by > or =50% and an end point score of 9 or less, were determined by weekly HDRS ratings. The DST revealed a statistically significant increase of the post-dexamethasone cortisol values (P = 0.021) and an increase in the post-dexamethasone ACTH values (P = 0.051) during lithium augmentation as compared to pre-treatment baseline evaluations. The pre-dexamethasone hormone values were unchanged. The number of non-suppressors at baseline was one and increased to three at follow-up. Results of DST did not predict response to lithium augmentation, which occurred in 40% of subjects. Results suggest that lithium augmentation increases HPA system activity, as indicated by the increase of post-dexamethasone cortisol and ACTH levels measured by the DST. This is in contrast to the established decline of HPA system activity during treatment with tricyclic antidepressants.

Bauer M, Berghöfer A, Bschor T, Baumgartner A, Kiesslinger U, Hellweg R, Adli M, Baethge C, Müller-Oerlinghausen B. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité, Humboldt University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. · Neuropsychopharmacology. · Pubmed #12377398 links to  free full text

Abstract: This prospective open-label study examined the efficacy of adjunctive supraphysiological doses of L-thyroxine (T(4)) in the maintenance treatment of prophylaxis-resistant affective disorder. Twenty-one (16 women, 5 men) of 25 patients enrolled consecutively over an 8-year period on the basis of their status of prophylaxis resistance (defined as two or more failures to standard prophylactic trials) participated for more than four months in the study and were eligible for the intention-to-treat analysis. The mean length of adjunctive treatment with T(4) was 51.4 +/- 21.7 months. The mean T(4) dose at study end was 378.6 +/- 90.2 micro g/d. The number of episodes and hospitalizations, and the morbidity indices during the time of prophylactic T(4) treatment, were compared with those measured for the same length of time before the start of T(4) treatment (mirror-image method). On the Clinical Global Impression for Bipolar Disorder scale (CGI-BP, Change from Worst Phase of Illness), eleven subjects (52.4%) were rated as "very much improved", four (19%) as "much improved", two (9.5%) as "minimally improved" and four (19%) as "no change." The mean total number of recurrences (8.6 before T(4) treatment vs. 2.8 during T(4) treatment; p =.004), the number of hospitalizations (3.1 vs. 1.9; p =.026) and the Morbidity Index (MI(Total) = 0.71 vs. MI(Total) = 0.28; p <.001) significantly declined during T(4) treatment. Subjects with bipolar disorder (n = 13) benefited more from the T4 treatment intervention than did subjects with unipolar major depressive disorder (n = 4) and schizoaffective disorder (n = 4). In conclusion, adjunctive treatment with L-thyroxine in supraphysiological doses may be an effective strategy in the maintenance treatment of patients with prophylaxis-resistant affective disorders.

Bschor T, Adli M, Baethge C, Eichmann U, Ising M, Uhr M, Modell S, Künzel H, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · Neuropsychopharmacology. · Pubmed #12225704 links to  free full text

Abstract: Lithium augmentation is a well established strategy for treatment-resistant depression. The exact mode of its action is unknown, but an enhancement of serotonergic transmission is hypothesized. The authors investigated changes in the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) system during lithium augmentation and their correlation to clinical response by means of the combined dexamethasone/CRH test (DEX/CRH test). Thirty patients with unipolar major depressive episodes (DSM IV) who had not responded to an adequate trial with an antidepressant were assessed on the day before lithium augmentation (baseline) with the DEX/CRH test (pretreatment with 1.5 mg dexamethasone p.o. at 11 P.M. and CRH stimulation at 3 P.M. on the next day). Twenty-four patients were re-assessed after response was determined or, in cases of non-response, four weeks after initiation of lithium augmentation. Response to lithium augmentation was measured by weekly ratings on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS 17-item version). Response was defined as a DeltaHDRS of > or =50% and an endpoint score of < 10. Patients had a significantly higher ACTH and cortisol response to CRH stimulation during lithium augmentation compared with the values at baseline. There was no difference in ACTH and cortisol reaction between responders and non-responders to lithium augmentation. This increase is in contrast to the known normalization of HPA-axis overdrive after treatment with a tricyclic antidepressant like amitriptyline. Because the effect was independent of response status we suggest that this increase reflects an effect of lithium that is independent from the psychopathological state or its change. This effect might be explained by the serotonergic effects of lithium.

Bschor T, Berghöfer A, Ströhle A, Kunz D, Adli M, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Bauer M. · Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · J Clin Psychopharmacol. · Pubmed #12172345 No free full text.

Abstract: There is compelling evidence from placebo-controlled studies that lithium augmentation is an effective strategy in the acute and continuation treatment of refractory unipolar major depression. Authors prospectively investigated the 1-year outcome of 22 subjects diagnosed with unipolar major depression who had participated in a 4-month placebo-controlled, double-blind continuation study of lithium augmentation without relapse. At the end of the double-blind phase, the blinded medication (lithium in 14 patients, placebo in 8 patients) was tapered off over a 1-week period, while the antidepressant was continued at the same dosage for another 4 weeks. Subsequently, the antidepressant was gradually discontinued over a 4-week period. Clinical status was assessed at regular follow-up visits. During the open 6-month follow-up period, seven subjects suffered an affective recurrence, five of whom had received lithium during the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the study. Study data suggest that active medication should be maintained for at least 1 year after successful lithium augmentation in patients with unipolar major depressive disorder.

Bauer M, Bschor T, Kunz D, Berghöfer A, Ströhle A, Müller-Oerlinghausen B. · Neuropsychiatric Institute & Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles, 90095-6968, USA. · Am J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #10964859 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Use of lithium to augment antidepressant medication has been shown to be beneficial in the acute treatment of depression. The authors examined the efficacy of lithium augmentation in the continuation treatment of unipolar major depressive disorder. METHOD: Thirty patients with a refractory major depressive episode who had responded to acute lithium augmentation during an open 6-week study participated in a randomized, parallel-group, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of lithium augmentation during continuation treatment. After a 2-4-week stabilization period following remission, patients were randomly assigned to receive either lithium or placebo for a 4-month period. Antidepressant medication was continued throughout the study. RESULTS: Relapses (including one suicide) occurred in seven (47%) of the 15 patients who received placebo in addition to antidepressants. None (0%) of the 14 patients who received lithium augmentation with antidepressants suffered a relapse during the double-blind phase of the study. Five of the seven relapsing patients in the placebo group developed a depressive episode, and the other two experienced a manic episode. CONCLUSIONS: Lithium augmentation in the continuation phase of treatment of unipolar major depressive disorder effectively protects patients against a relapse. Patients who respond to lithium augmentation should be maintained on lithium augmentation for a minimum of 6 months or even longer.

Bschor T, Adli M. · No affiliation provided · Dtsch Arztebl Int. · Pubmed #19578410 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: A confusing variety of options are available for the treatment of depressive disorders. METHOD: Selective literature review under consideration of current guidelines. RESULTS: The treatment of depression can be divided into acute, maintenance and prophylactic phases. The basic forms of treatment are pharmacotherapy, psychotherapy, and supportive strategies. The approximately 30 antidepressants currently on the market differ mainly with respect to their side effect profiles. Of the specific types of psychotherapy, cognitive behavioral therapy, psychodynamic therapy, and psychoanalysis are funded by the statutory health insurance providers in Germany. All treatment strategies (except for sleep deprivation) show a latency of onset of several weeks and a nonresponse rate of about 30% to 50%. In clinical practice it is essential to follow a stepwise procedure and to perform a standardized evaluation of response after the latency period. In the event of nonresponse, the next step of treatment should be initiated. DISCUSSION: Depressive disorders have a good prognosis provided one takes best advantage of the available treatment options. Preconditions are continuation of treatment for an appropriate length of time (for antidepressants ca. 4 to 6 weeks, for psychotherapy ca. 4 to 12 weeks) and standardized evaluation of response thereafter.

Adli M, Pilhatsch M, Bauer M, Köberle U, Ricken R, Janssen G, Ulrich S, Bschor T. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany. · Pharmacopsychiatry. · Pubmed #19067263 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Because the irreversible monoamine oxidase inhibitor tranylcypromine (TCP) was introduced nearly 50 years ago, only few studies exist on today's clinical prescribing practice together with 2nd and 3rd generation psychotropic drugs. METHODS: We performed a practice-based observational study of patients with depression treated with TCP in two psychiatric departments in Berlin to assess side effects, effectiveness, comedication and acceptance of the low-tyramine diet. RESULTS: We identified thirty-two patients treated with TCP at a mean dose of 51.9 mg/day after an average of 3.3 pre-treatments in the current episode. Dosing of TCP and the use of multiple psychotropic comedications indicate a high-intensity treatment. The most frequent side effects resulted from arterial hypotonia (28%). Dietary restrictions were mainly rated as moderate. 59% of patients remitted (HAMD- (21)<9 or CGI-I=1) and 22% responded (HAMD- (21) reduction >50% or CGI-I=2). DISCUSSION: A high-intensity treatment of inpatients with TCP is clinically feasible, i.e., the use of high doses and multiple comedications with a good benefit-risk-ratio. Prospective data aiming at comparisons with modern antidepressants and clarifying further safety issues are warranted.

Mahlberg R, Adli M, Bschor T, Kienast T. · Institute of Psychogerontology, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität, Erlangen-Nürnberg, Germany. · Int J Neurosci. · Pubmed #18698515 No free full text.

Abstract: Impairment of executive functions and attention has been found in patients with acute depressive episodes but has rarely been investigated in manic patients to date. At the same time, executive functions decline with age. Thus, it is currently a matter of debate how to best measure decreased executive performance in elderly patients with affective disorders. In our study, we examined 30 depressed patients, 28 manic patients, and 30 healthy subjects of all age groups, using the Trail Making Test (TMT). Both depressed and manic patients needed twice as long as healthy subjects to perform the TMT Part A. In addition to this reduced performance due to affective disorders, we were also able to detect a decline in performance due to age. One could thus postulate that age and affective disorders each influence a different neuropsychological function, age affecting executive performance and affective disorders affecting attention, as measured in both cases by the TMT.

Mahlberg R, Kienast T, Bschor T, Adli M. · Institute of Psychogerontology, Naegelsbachstr. 25, D-91052 Erlangen, Germany. · Eur Psychiatry. · Pubmed #18515048 No free full text.

Abstract: Patients with affective disorders have often been reported to experience subjective changes in how they perceive the flow of time. Time reproduction tasks provide information about the memory component of time perception and are thought to remain unaffected by pulse rate disturbances in the pacemaker of the internal clock. In our study, 30 patients with acute depression, 30 patients with acute mania, and 30 healthy subjects of all age groups were presented with a time reproduction task. Participants were asked to observe a stimulus presented on a computer screen for a certain length of time and, subsequently, to reproduce the stimulus for a similar length of time by pressing the space bar on the computer keyboard. Stimuli were presented to each subject for 1, 6, and 37s. On average, the time intervals reproduced by manic patients were shorter than those reproduced by depressed patients. Manic patients reproduced the short time interval (6s) correctly, but under-reproduced the long time interval (37s, P<0.001). Depressed patients correctly reproduced the long time interval, but over-reproduced the short time interval (P<0.001). Remembering time intervals as having been longer than they actually were may lead to a slowed experience of time, as has been described in depressed patients; precisely the converse seems to apply to manic patients.

Bauer M, Wilson T, Neuhaus K, Sasse J, Pfennig A, Lewitzka U, Grof P, Glenn T, Rasgon N, Bschor T, Whybrow PC. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany. · Psychiatry Res. · Pubmed #18423616 No free full text.

Abstract: With the widespread recognition of the value of active patient participation in their care, ChronoRecord software was developed to automate daily self-reporting by patients with bipolar disorder. A prior study demonstrated concurrent validity between self-ratings on ChronoRecord and clinician ratings on the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HAMD), but validity with the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) could not be shown due to a lack of data when the outpatients were manic (Bauer et al., Bipolar Disorders 6, 67-74, 2004). This study expanded upon the prior validation study to include inpatients with mania. Self-reported mood ratings on ChronoRecord and clinician ratings on the YMRS were obtained on the same day from 27 inpatients (57 ratings); these data were also combined with the ratings from the 80 outpatients (total 107 patients, 340 ratings). Using Pearson correlation, the self-reported ratings on ChronoRecord were significantly correlated with the YMRS. The accuracy of ChronoRecord to discriminate hypomania and mania was high, as described by the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve. Post-hoc analysis of the level of agreement between ChronoRecord and YMRS ratings was excellent or good in all cases using the kappa statistic. These data demonstrate concurrent validity between ChronoRecord and YMRS.

Bauer M, Blumentritt H, Finke R, Schlattmann P, Adli M, Baethge C, Bschor T, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Berghöfer A. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #17346802 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To determine thyroid gland volume and the prevalence of goiter in patients receiving long-term lithium treatment for affective disorders. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we performed ultrasonographic examinations in 96 patients on long-term lithium treatment, including those with bipolar, major depressive, and schizoaffective disease. Patients with documented continuous and adequate serum lithium levels for more than or equal to 6 months were recruited consecutively from the Berlin Lithium Clinic. Ultrasonographic examinations were also performed in 96 gender- and age-matched control subjects. Patients and controls were 18 years of age or older and were residents of Berlin, Germany and surrounding areas. RESULTS: Total thyroid volume was significantly greater in the lithium-treated group than among controls (23.7 ml vs. 13.6 ml). Ultrasonography detected that significantly more lithium-treated subjects had goiter than did control subjects (N=53 vs. N=19). Clinical inspection and palpation only detected goiter in 24 of the lithium-treated patients and in 12 control subjects. In a patient subgroup taking levothyroxine, the prevalence of goiter was still 37%. Patients who were not taking levothyroxine had significantly higher TSH basal levels than normal controls (2.1 mU/L vs. 1.3 mU/L). LIMITATIONS: Cross-sectional study; no control for other factors related to thyroid enlargement and goiter such as dietary issues, smoking, or iodine intake; affectively ill subjects were treated with additional psychotropic medications. CONCLUSIONS: Thyroid enlargement was found in a significant number of lithium-treated patients. Ultrasonography proved superior to palpatory inspection in detecting goiter. Regular use of ultrasonography for early detection of thyroid enlargement in patients on long-term lithium treatment is therefore recommended.

Bauer M, Rasgon N, Grof P, Glenn T, Lapp M, Marsh W, Munoz R, Suwalska A, Baethge C, Bschor T, Alda M, Whybrow PC. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Schumannstrasse 20/21, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Eur Psychiatry. · Pubmed #16782312 No free full text.

Abstract: This prospective, longitudinal study compared the frequency and pattern of mood changes between outpatients receiving usual care for bipolar disorder who were either taking or not taking antidepressants. One hundred and eighty-two patients with bipolar disorder self-reported mood and psychiatric medications for 4 months using a computerized system (ChronoRecord) and returned 22,626 days of data. One hundred and four patients took antidepressants, 78 did not. Of the antidepressants taken, 95% were selective serotonin or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors, or second-generation antidepressants. Of the patients taking an antidepressant, 91.3% were concurrently taking a mood stabilizer. The use of antidepressants did not influence the daily rate of switching from depression to mania or the rate of rapid cycling, independent of diagnosis of bipolar I or II. The primary difference in mood pattern was the time spent normal or depressed. Patients taking antidepressants frequently remained in a subsyndromal depression. In this naturalistic study using self-reported data, patients with bipolar disorder who were taking antidepressants--overwhelmingly not tricyclics and with a concurrent mood stabilizer--did not experience an increase in the rate of switches to mania or rapid cycling compared to those not taking antidepressants. Antidepressants had little impact on the mood patterns of bipolar patients taking mood stabilizers.

Bauer M, Grof P, Rasgon N, Bschor T, Glenn T, Whybrow PC. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité--University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte (CCM), Berlin, Germany. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #16542186 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Early recognition of the prodromal symptoms of bipolar disorder, combined with a patient action plan, may help to prevent relapses. Sleep disturbances are frequent warning signs of both mania and depression. This study used cross correlation analysis to characterize the relationship between mood, sleep and bedrest in longitudinal data. METHODS: Self-reported mood, sleep and bedrest (mean 169 +/- 59 days of data per patient) from 59 outpatients with bipolar disorder receiving standard treatment were analyzed. The cross correlation function was used to determine the latency between the changes in sleep and/or bedrest and mood for time shifts of between -7 and 7 days. RESULTS: For sleep and/or bedrest, a significant inverse correlation was found with the change in mood, most commonly with a time latency of one day. Sleep plus bedrest had the strongest relationship with a change in mood, with a significant correlation in 24 of 59 patients (41%) for the night before or night of a mood change. The patients with a significant cross-correlation between mood and sleep plus bedrest reported about two thirds of all large sleep changes of >3 h and three fourths of all large mood changes (>20 on 100-unit scale). Patients with a significant cross correlation were more likely to take benzodiazepines. CONCLUSION: In most patients with a significant cross correlation between sleep and/or bedrest and mood, the mood change occurred on the day following the change in sleep and/or bedrest. Sleep changes from a previous pattern, especially those of more than 3 h, may indicate that a large mood change is imminent.

Baethge C, Baldessarini RJ, Freudenthal K, Streeruwitz A, Bauer M, Bschor T. · Department of Psychiatry, International Consortium for Bipolar Disorder Research, Harvard Medical School, McLean Division of Massachusetts General Hospital, Belmont, MA 02478-9106, USA. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #15762854 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: As there is very little research on the topic, we compared the frequency and the type hallucinations among hospitalized patients diagnosed with bipolar disorder (BPD) versus other major psychiatric illnesses. METHODS: At admission, all patients hospitalized at the Department of Psychiatry at the Freie Universität Berlin (1981-2001) underwent comprehensive assessments using the standardized Association for Methodology and Documentation in Psychiatry (AMDP) system. We used these data to compare risks and types of hallucinations and associated factors by bivariate and multivariate testing in patients diagnosed with BPD, major depression, or schizophrenia. RESULTS: At admission, the cross-sectional prevalence of current hallucinations among 4972 hospitalized subjects ranked: schizophrenia (61.1%), bipolar mixed (22.9%), bipolar manic (11.2%), bipolar depressed (10.5%), unipolar depressed (5.9%). The most frequent hallucinations across all patients were auditory, followed by somatic and visual hallucinations. There were only minor age or sex differences in risk of hallucinations. Compared with patients diagnosed with schizophrenia, hallucinations among patients with BPD were less severe, more visual and less often auditory. Characteristics of hallucinations were similar among manic and both bipolar- and unipolar-depressed subjects. Among patients with major affective disorders, those with hallucinations were less well-educated, had higher anxiety scores, less insight into the illness, and their hospitalizations averaged 17% longer. Across all diagnoses, hallucinations, particularly olfactory, were significantly associated with delusions. Hallucinations in BPD were most often accompanied by persecutory delusions; delusions of grandeur were least associated with hallucinations. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides detailed descriptive data regarding the frequency (cross-sectional) and characteristics of hallucinations in a large sample of patients with BPD, major depression or schizophrenia. Our results suggest a link of lower education and the presence of hallucinations in major affective disorders. The significance of this finding, as well as the role of anxiety in hallucinating patients, requires further study.

Bauer M, Fairbanks L, Berghöfer A, Hierholzer J, Bschor T, Baethge C, Rasgon N, Sasse J, Whybrow PC. · Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Campus Charité Mitte, Berlin, Germany. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #15555712 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This prospective study was designed to determine whether patients with prophylaxis-resistant affective disorders, receiving adjunctive maintenance therapy with supraphysiological doses of levothyroxine (L-T4), show evidence of accelerated bone loss compared to the reference population database. METHODS: In 21 patients, bone mineral density (BMD) of the spine (lumbar vertebrae L1-L4) and femur (femoral neck, trochanter, and Ward's triangle) was measured by dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). BMD measurement was performed first after patients had been on thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)-suppressive therapy with L-T4 (mean dose=411 mcg/d) for an average of 16.4 months and again after 33.6 months of L-T4 (mean dose=416 mcg/d) therapy. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the actual percentage decline in bone mineral density and the expected percentage decline in any of the measured bone regions. In a stepwise linear regression analysis, age was identified as a predictor of percentage change in BMD. After controlling for age, the only other variable that showed a consistent trend was the dose of L-T4, with higher doses being positively correlated with the percentage decline of BMD. LIMITATIONS: Relatively small sample size, no bone density assessment prior to treatment with L-T4, no patient control group with mood disorders who did not receive L-T4 treatment, and bone density follow-up intervals were variable. CONCLUSIONS: This study did not demonstrate evidence that long-term treatment of affectively ill patients with supraphysiological doses of L-T4 significantly accelerates loss of bone mineral density compared to the age-matched reference population. However, the decline of BMD in one individual patient underscores that caution is indicated and that regular assessment of BMD during longer-term supraphysiological thyroid hormone treatment is needed.

Bschor T, Ising M, Bauer M, Lewitzka U, Skerstupeit M, Müller-Oerlinghausen B, Baethge C. · Department of Psychiatry, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · Acta Psychiatr Scand. · Pubmed #14984395 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Studies on the time sense of depressed patients have revealed inconsistent results. Manic patients have been almost neglected. METHOD: Patients with a major depressive episode (n = 32), or a manic episode (n = 30) (both Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders-IV, Mini-International Neuropsychiatric Interview-confirmed), and 31 healthy controls were included. The subjective time experience was assessed by a visual analog scale (VAS), the objectively measurable time judgment abilities by the Chronotest, a computer program developed for this study, consisting of time estimation and time production tasks. RESULTS: Controls reported a balanced, manic patients an enhanced, and depressive patients a slowed experience of time flow in the VAS (P < 0.001). In the time judgment tasks, however, both depressed and manic patients showed time overestimation for the longer time spans (P < 0.008). CONCLUSION: This largest study on time sense in manic patients confirmed results of a divergent alteration of time experience in depressive and in manic patients but revealed an uniform time overestimation by both patient groups in time judgment tasks.