| 1 |
Guideline World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders in Primary Care. 2007
Bauer M, Bschor T, Pfennig A, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Versiani M, Möller HJ, Anonymous00106. · University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #17455102 No free full text.
Abstract: These practical guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders in primary care settings were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). They embody the results of a systematic review of all available clinical and scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders and offer practical recommendations for general practitioners encountering patients with these conditions. The guidelines cover disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of unipolar depressive disorders, and the principles of management in the acute, continuation and maintenance phase. They deal primarily with biological treatment (including antidepressants, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy).
|
| 2 |
Guideline World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 2: Maintenance treatment of major depressive disorder and treatment of chronic depressive disorders and subthreshold depressions. 2002
Bauer M, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Versiani M, Möller HJ, Anonymous00267. · University of California Los Angeles (UCLA), Neuropsychiatric Institute & Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, Los Angeles, CA, USA. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12479080 No free full text.
Abstract: These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal for developing these guidelines was to systematically review all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of the complete spectrum of unipolar depressive disorders, and to produce a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating patients with these conditions. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for depressive disorders, as well as from meta-analyses and reviews on the efficacy of antidepressant medications and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and was then categorized into four levels of evidence (A-D). The first part of these WFSBP guidelines on unipolar depressive disorders covered the acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder (Bauer et al 2002). This second part of the guidelines covers the management of the maintenance-phase treatment of major depressive disorder, as well as the treatment of chronic and subthreshold depressive disorders (dysthymic disorder, double depression, minor depressive disorder and recurrent brief depression). These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antidepressants, lithium, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, and electroconvulsive therapy) of young adults and also, albeit to a lesser extent, children, adolescents and older adults.
|
| 3 |
Editorial The bipolar spectrum. free! 2007
Angst J. · No affiliation provided · Br J Psychiatry. · Pubmed #17329735 links to free full text
Abstract: The two-dimensional bipolar spectrum described here comprises a continuum of severity from normal to psychotic and a continuum from depression, via three bipolar subgroups to mania. This combination of dimensional and categorical principles for classifying mood disorders may help alleviate the problems of underdiagnosis and undertreatment of bipolar disorders.
|
| 4 |
Review Are antidepressants safe in the treatment of bipolar depression? A critical evaluation of their potential risk to induce switch into mania or cycle acceleration. 2008
Licht RW, Gijsman H, Nolen WA, Angst J. · Mood Disorders Research Unit, Aarhus University Hospital, Risskov, Denmark. · Acta Psychiatr Scand. · Pubmed #18754834 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To address whether switch of depression into hypomania or mania or cycle acceleration in patients with bipolar disorder is caused by antidepressants or whether this phenomenon is attributable to the natural history of bipolar disorder itself. METHOD: A critical review of the literature, pointing at sources of bias that have been previously overlooked. For examining the causation in question, the Bradford-Hill criteria were applied, i.e. specificity of the potential causative agent, strength of effect, consistency in findings, dose-response relation, temporal relation with exposure to agent preceding effect and biological plausibility. RESULTS: There is a scarcity of randomized studies addressing the question, and the available studies all suffer from various forms of bias. However, there is some evidence suggesting that antidepressants given in addition to a mood stabilizer are not associated with an increased rate of switch when compared with the rate associated with the mood stabilizer alone. CONCLUSION: When combined with a mood stabilizer, antidepressants given for acute bipolar depression seemingly do not induce a switch into hypomania or mania. Whether antidepressants may accelerate episode frequency and/or may cause other forms of destabilization in patients with bipolar disorder remain to be properly studied.
|
| 5 |
Review Bipolar disorder--methodological problems and future perspectives. 2008
Angst J. · Zurich University, Psychiatric Hospital, Research Department, Zurich, Switzerland. · Dialogues Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #18689284 No free full text.
Abstract: Since its "rebirth" in 1966, bipolar disorder (BPD) has rapidly come to occupy a central position in the research and treatment of mood disorders. Compared with major depressive disorder (MDD), BPD is a more serious condition, characterized by much more frequent recurrence, more complex comorbidity, and higher mortality. One major problem is the lack of valid definitions in adult and in child psychiatry; the current definitions are unsatisfactory, and heavily favor an overdiagnosis of MDD. Biological research is partially based on those definitions, which have a short half-life. An additional, dimensional, approach, quantifying hypomania, depression, and anxiety by self-assessment and symptom checklists is recommended. A further, related problem is the early recognition of the onset of BPD, especially in adolescence, and the identification of correlates in childhood. Early and timely diagnosis of BPD is necessary to enable prompt intervention and secondary prevention of the disorder. The paper describes the current status and future directions of developing clinical concepts of bipolarity.
|
| 6 |
Review Diagnosis and course of affective psychoses: was Kraepelin right? 2008
Angst J, Gamma A. · Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik, Lenggstrasse 31, Postfach 1931, 8032, Zurich, Switzerland. · Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #18516522 No free full text.
Abstract: Kraepelin's basic attitude to the classification of psychoses was data-oriented and flexible. In his latter years he was close to revising his own celebrated dichotomy between manic-depressive insanity and dementia praecox in order to take account of a large group of intermediate psychoses, which today are called schizo-affective. His concept of a continuum from healthy to ill has stood the test of time and corresponds to modern epidemiological findings. Kraepelin's unitarian concept of manic-depressive insanity did not survive. It was differentiated and broken down into several subgroups, and a proportional diagnostic spectrum with a continuum from mania via bipolar disorders to depression has recently even been proposed. Bipolar disorders would in that case be comorbid disorders of mania plus depression. In contrast to Kraepelin's unitarian view the long-term prognosis of subgroups of mood disorders varies considerably. Overall it is nevertheless astonishing how much of Kraepelin's legacy has survived.
|
| 7 |
Review Validity and utility of bipolar spectrum models. 2008
Phelps J, Angst J, Katzow J, Sadler J. · Corvallis Psychiatric Clinic, Corvallis, OR 97330, USA. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #18199236 No free full text.
Abstract: The bipolar spectrum model suggests that several patient presentations not currently recognized by the DSM warrant consideration as part of a mood disorders continuum. These include hypomania or mania associated with antidepressants; manic symptoms which fall short of the current DSM threshold for hypomania; and depression attended by multiple non-manic markers that are associated with bipolar course. Evidence supporting the inclusion of these groups within the realm of bipolar disorder (BP) is examined. Several diagnostic tools for detecting and characterizing these patient groups are described. Finally, options for altering DSM-IV criteria to allow some of the above patient presentations to be recognized as bipolar are considered. More data on the validity and utility of these alterations would be useful, but limited changes appear warranted now. We describe an additional BP Not Otherwise Specified (BP NOS) example which creates a subthreshold hypomanic analogue to cyclothymia, consistent with existing BP NOS criteria. This change should be accompanied by additional requirements for the assessment and reporting of non-manic bipolar markers.
|
| 8 |
Review Recurrent brief depression revisited. 2005
Pezawas L, Angst J, Kasper S. · Department of General Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Int Rev Psychiatry. · Pubmed #16194772 No free full text.
Abstract: Recurrent Brief Depressive Disorder (RBD) is a well-defined and prevalent mood disorder with an increased risk of suicidal behavior and significant clinical impairment in the community and general practice. Occurring at least monthly with depressive episodes lasting only a few days defines recurrent Brief Depressive Disorder. The lifetime co-occurrence of both RBD and Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), called Combined Depression (CD), substantially increases the risk for attempted suicide, even more than that known for 'pure' MDD. The diagnostic criteria for RBD found in the ICD-10 and DSM-IV are helpful in research and clinical routine as well as several methodological issues, which make clinical diagnostic and drug response evaluation of RBD very different from MDD. Formal differences in the course of RBD and MDD require different designs for drug treatment studies. Denials of disorder, specific methodological requirements, and highly selected patient samples have probably been responsible for false negative results in double blind, placebo-controlled treatment studies. Although several authors reported successful treatment of RBD with different compounds in about 60 patients, it is still not possible to deduce a treatment algorithm for RBD to date. Obviously future treatment studies without the limitations of previous studies are clearly required for RBD. Results of ongoing studies will soon provide the first data on the biological underpinnings of RBD.
|
| 9 |
Review The mood spectrum: improving the diagnosis of bipolar disorder. 2005
Angst J, Cassano G. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #15948762 No free full text.
Abstract: Although the distinction between bipolar and unipolar disorders served our field well in the early days of psychopharmacology, in clinical practice it is apparent that their phenotypes are only partially described by current diagnostic classification systems. A substantial body of evidence has accrued suggesting that clinical variability needs to be viewed in terms of a broad conceptualization of mood disorders and their common threshold or subthreshold comorbidity. The spectrum model provides a useful dimensional approach to psychopathology and is based on the assumption that early-onset and enduring symptoms shape the adult personality and establish a vulnerability to the subsequent development of Axis-I disorders. To obtain a clearer understanding of the depressive phenotype, it is pivotal that we increase our detection of hypomanic symptoms so that clinicians can better distinguish bipolar II disorder from unipolar depression. Diagnostic criteria sensitive to hypomanic symptoms have been identified that suggest bipolar II disorder is at least as prevalent as major depression. Moreover, the comorbidities of these illnesses are very different and alcoholism in particular appears to be a greater problem in bipolar II disorder than in unipolar depression. Structured clinical interviews and patient self-report questionnaires have also successfully identified the presence of hypomanic symptoms in patients with unipolar disorder and support the concept of a spectrum of bipolar illness. In conclusion, the importance of subthreshold syndromes should not be underestimated as failure to recognize bipolar spectrum disorder could delay treatment and worsen prognosis.
|
| 10 |
Review Diagnostic issues in bipolar disorder. 2003
Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Ajdacic V, Eich D, Rössler W. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Lenggstrasse 31 CH-8029, Zürich, Switzerland. · Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. · Pubmed #12957719 No free full text.
Abstract: Bipolar disorder is a highly recurrent and chronic psychiatric condition that shortens life expectancy, causes functional impairment and disruption to social, work and family life. Several forms of bipolar disorder are recognised, including both bipolar I and bipolar II disorder. Bipolar I is characterised by recurrent episodes of depression and mania whereas bipolar II disorder is characterised by recurrent depression and hypomania, a milder form of mania. There has been debate concerning the definition of hypomania since at least the 1970s. The main areas of argument focus on the minimum duration of hypomania, its stem criteria and the number of symptoms required for diagnosis. Arriving at the correct definition of hypomania is a key diagnostic issue. There is increasing evidence for the existence of a broad spectrum of bipolar disorders, and data demonstrating the clinical validity of modifying some of the criteria for hypomania are reviewed here.
|
| 11 |
Review Recurrent brief depression--past and future. 2003
Pezawas L, Angst J, Gamma A, Ajdacic V, Eich D, Rössler W. · Department of General Psychiatry, University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12551729 No free full text.
Abstract: Recurrent brief depressive disorder (RBD) is a well-defined and significantly prevalent affective disorder with an increased risk of suicidal behavior and significant clinical impairment in the community and general practice. RBD is characterized by depressive episodes occurring at least once a month and lasting for only a few days. The lifetime co-occurrence of both RBD and major depressive disorder (MDD), called combined depression (CD), increases substantially the risk for suicide attempts, even more than is known for "pure" MDD. Diagnostic criteria for RBD can be found in the ICD-10 and DSM-IV and are helpful in both, research and clinical routine. Furthermore, several methodological issues are covered in this paper, which make clinical diagnostic and drug response evaluation of RBD very different from MDD. However, clinical procedures rather bear a resemblance to those used in the treatment of migraine or epilepsy. Formal differences in the course of RBD and MDD create different needs concerning the design of drug treatment studies. Absence of special methodological requirements and highly selected patient samples has probably been responsible for false negative results in double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment studies. Although several authors reported successful treatment of RBD with different compounds in about 60 patients, it is still not possible to deduce a treatment algorithm for RBD to date. Obviously, future treatment studies without the limitations of previous studies are clearly required for RBD.
|
| 12 |
Review A new bipolar spectrum concept: a brief review. 2002
Angst J, Gamma A. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #12479669 No free full text.
Abstract: Research on the broad bipolar spectrum is dependent on the definition of hypomania. We recently proposed a new, softer syndromal definition with clinical validity. This broadens the diagnosis of bipolar II (BP-II) disorder at the expense of major depressive disorder (MDD). There is evidence for a third group of suspected BP-II manifesting major depression plus hypomanic symptoms. The two bipolar-II groups together are as prevalent as MDD. A new concept of minor bipolar disorder embracing dysthymia, minor and recurrent brief depression with hypomanic syndromes and symptoms is discussed. Some methodological pitfalls of research on drug-induced hypomania as an element of the bipolar spectrum are also summarized.
|
| 13 |
Review World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP) Guidelines for Biological Treatment of Unipolar Depressive Disorders, Part 1: Acute and continuation treatment of major depressive disorder. 2002
Bauer M, Whybrow PC, Angst J, Versiani M, Möller HJ, Anonymous00268. · Neuropsychiatric Institute & Hospital, Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California at Los Angeles (ULCA), 300 UCLA Medical Plaza, Suite 2330, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12479086 No free full text.
Abstract: These practice guidelines for the biological treatment of unipolar depressive disorders were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). The goal for developing these guidelines was to systematically review all available evidence pertaining to the treatment of unipolar depressive disorders, and to produce a series of practice recommendations that are clinically and scientifically meaningful based on the available evidence. These guidelines are intended for use by all physicians seeing and treating patients with these conditions. The data used for developing these guidelines have been extracted primarily from various national treatment guidelines and panels for depressive disorders, as well as from meta-analyses and reviews on the efficacy of antidepressant medications and other biological treatment interventions identified by a search of the MEDLINE database and Cochrane Library. The identified literature was evaluated with respect to the strength of evidence for its efficacy and was then categorized into four levels of evidence (A-D). This first part of the guidelines covers disease definition, classification, epidemiology and course of unipolar depressive disorders, as well as the management of the acute and continuation-phase treatment. These guidelines are primarily concerned with the biological treatment (including antidepressants, other psychopharmacological and hormonal medications, electroconvulsive therapy, light therapy, adjunctive and novel therapeutic strategies) of young adults and also, albeit to a lesser extent, children, adolescents and older adults.
|
| 14 |
Review [Temperament and affective disorders. The TEMPS-A Scale as a convergence of European and US-American concepts] 2002
Akiskal HS, Brieger P, Mundt C, Angst J, Marneros A. · International Mood Centre, Department of Psychiatry, University of California at San Diego, USA. · Nervenarzt. · Pubmed #11963262 No free full text.
Abstract: In temperament research, three traditions can be found: (1) in psychiatry or psychopathology, (2) in neurobiology, and (3) in developmental psychology. After giving an overview, we present results and theories concerning the relation between temperament and affective disorders. Based on Kraepelin's concept of the fundamental states ("Grundszustände"), we describe four types of temperament: hyperthymic (manic), depressive, irritable, and cyclothymic. A fifth anxious temperament is added. Clinical description and scientific implications are described in the light of recent work by Akiskal and the German version of the TEMPS-A scale, a self-report questionnaire for assessing temperament.
|
| 15 |
Review Bipolarity from ancient to modern times: conception, birth and rebirth. 2001
Angst J, Marneros A. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #11869749 No free full text.
Abstract: We review the history of bipolar disorders from the classical Greek period to DSM-IV. Perhaps the first person who described mania and melancholia as two different phenomenological states of one and the same disease was the Greek physician of the 1st century AD, Aretaeus of Cappadocia. The modern concept of bipolar disorders was born in France, with the publications of and. Emil Kraepelin, however, in 1899, unified all types of affective disorders in 'manic-depressive insanity'; in spite of some opposition, Kraepelin's unitary concept was adopted worldwide. In the 1960s, however, the rebirth of bipolar disorders took place through the publications of Jules Angst, Carlo Perris, and George Winokur, who independently showed that there exist clinical, familial and course characteristics validating the distinction between unipolar and bipolar disorders; in addition, they verified several of the corresponding opinions of the Wernicke-Kleist-Leonhard school. The concept of unipolar and bipolar disorders has further advanced in the last three decades: landmark developments include the renaissance of Kraepelin's mixed states and of Kahlbaum's and Hecker's cyclothymia and related affective temperaments, the concept of soft bipolar spectrum (Akiskal), and the distinction of schizoaffective disorders into unipolar and bipolar forms.
|
| 16 |
Review Re-evaluating the prevalence of and diagnostic composition within the broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. 2000
Akiskal HS, Bourgeois ML, Angst J, Post R, Möller H, Hirschfeld R. · International Mood Center, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #11121824 No free full text.
Abstract: Until recently it was believed that no more than 1% of the general population has bipolar disorder. Emerging transatlantic data are beginning to provide converging evidence for a higher prevalence of up to at least 5%. Manic states, even those with mood-incongruent features, as well as mixed (dysphoric) mania, are now formally included in both ICD-10 and DSM-IV. Mixed states occur in an average of 40% of bipolar patients over a lifetime; current evidence supports a broader definition of mixed states consisting of full-blown mania with two or more concomitant depressive symptoms. The largest increase in prevalence rates, however, is accounted for by 'softer' clinical expressions of bipolarity situated between the extremes of full-blown bipolar disorder where the person has at least one manic episode (bipolar I) and strictly defined unipolar major depressive disorder without personal or family history for excited periods. Bipolar II is the prototype for these intermediary conditions with major depressions and history of spontaneous hypomanic episodes; current evidence indicates that most hypomanias pursue a recurrent course and that their usual duration is 1-3 days, falling below the arbitrary 4-day cutoff required in DSM-IV. Depressions with antidepressant-associated hypomania (sometimes referred to as bipolar III) also appear, on the basis of extensive international research neglected by both ICD-10 and DSM-IV, to belong to the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders. Broadly defined, the bipolar spectrum in studies conducted during the last decade accounts for 30-55% of all major depressions. Rapid-cycling, defined as alternation of depressive and excited (at least four per year), more often arise from a bipolar II than a bipolar I baseline; such cycling does not in the main appear to be a distinct clinical subtype - but rather a transient complication in 20% in the long-term course of bipolar disorder. Major depressions superimposed on cyclothymic oscillations represent a more severe variant of bipolar II, often mistaken for borderline or other personality disorders in the dramatic cluster. Moreover, atypical depressive features with reversed vegetative signs, anxiety states, as well as alcohol and substance abuse comorbidity, is common in these and other bipolar patients. The proper recognition of the entire clinical spectrum of bipolarity behind such 'masks' has important implications for psychiatric research and practice. Conditions which require further investigation include: (1) major depressive episodes where hyperthymic traits - lifelong hypomanic features without discrete hypomanic episodes - dominate the intermorbid or premorbid phases; and (2) depressive mixed states consisting of few hypomanic symptoms (i.e., racing thoughts, sexual arousal) during full-blown major depressive episodes - included in Kraepelin's schema of mixed states, but excluded by DSM-IV. These do not exhaust all potential diagnostic entities for possible inclusion in the clinical spectrum of bipolar disorders: the present review did not consider cyclic, seasonal, irritable-dysphoric or otherwise impulse-ridden, intermittently explosive or agitated psychiatric conditions for which the bipolar connection is less established. The concept of bipolar spectrum as used herein denotes overlapping clinical expressions, without necessarily implying underlying genetic homogeneity. In the course of the illness of the same patient, one often observes the varied manifestations described above - whether they be formal diagnostic categories or those which have remained outside the official nosology. Some form of life charting of illness with colored graphic representation of episodes, stressors, and treatments received can be used to document the uniquely varied course characteristic of each patient, thereby greatly enhancing clinical evaluation.
|
| 17 |
Review Major depression in 1998: are we providing optimal therapy? 1999
Angst J. · Department of Psychiatry, Psychiatric University Hospital, Zurich, Switzerland. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #10235118 No free full text.
Abstract: Depression is a common illness associated with long duration of episodes, high rates of chronicity, relapse and recurrence, psychosocial and physical impairment, and high suicide rate. A lifetime prevalence of approximately 17% has been widely reported, and the likelihood of recurrence is more than 50%. A conceptual shift has occurred in our understanding of depression. It is now seen as a chronic medical disorder that produces as much functional limitation and morbidity as chronic diseases such as hypertension and diabetes. Predictors of chronicity include long duration of index episode, relationship difficulties, low family income, admitting research center, and inpatient hospitalization. Risk factors for recurrence include lack of self-confidence, neuroticism, previous hospital admission, loss events, and age. The aim of treatment is to induce a stable, fully asymptomatic state with full restoration of psychosocial function and to establish a long-term state of wellness. Despite effective pharmacotherapy, depressed patients are often underdiagnosed and undertreated by both psychiatrists and primary care physicians. The psychosocial and physical impairment, comorbidity, and high suicide rate associated with chronic, recurrent depression require optimal treatment strategies. The future of antidepressant treatment should focus on remission or getting the patient well and drugs that will induce and maintain long-term recovery.
|
| 18 |
Review Suicide risk in patients with major depressive disorder. 1999
Angst J, Angst F, Stassen HH. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Switzerland. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #10073389 No free full text.
Abstract: Understanding the origins of suicide is the first step in preventing it. Review of the current literature has revealed only limited data from general practice and community samples; most research has been performed on inpatient psychiatric populations, and extended follow-ups are rare. Mood disorders were found to be highly associated with suicide, especially in patients with major depressive disorder. Depression is an important factor in suicides of adolescents and the elderly, but those with late-onset depression are at higher risk. Both comorbidity with other disorders, such as anxiety and agitation, and rapid changes in the depressive state, for instance after release from the hospital, increase the risk for suicide.
|
| 19 |
Clinical Conference Melancholia and atypical depression in the Zurich study: epidemiology, clinical characteristics, course, comorbidity and personality. 2007
Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Ajdacic V, Rössler W. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Department of Psychiatry, Zurich, Switzerland. · Acta Psychiatr Scand Suppl. · Pubmed #17280573 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: A comparison of psychiatric, psychological and somatic characteristics in specified subgroups of major depressive episodes (MDE). METHOD: In a stratified community sample of young adults investigated prospectively from age 20/21 to 40/41, we defined four MDE subgroups: i) DSM-IV melancholia or atypical depression (the 'combined group'), ii) pure melancholia, iii) pure atypical depression, and iv) unspecified MDE. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence rates of the four groups were 4.1%, 7.1%, 3.5% and 8.2% respectively. Women were over-represented in the combined and atypically depressed group. In 56 of 117 (47.9%) cases, melancholia was longitudinally associated with atypical MDE (n = 84) (OR = 11.9). CONCLUSION: Melancholic MDE was more severe than atypical MDE although the two groups shared many characteristics. The longitudinal overlap of melancholia with atypical depression in almost half of all cases calls for comparative analyses of combined, pure and unspecified MDE.
|
| 20 |
Clinical Conference Fluoxetine versus moclobemide: cross-comparison between the time courses of improvement. 1999
Stassen HH, Angst J, Delini-Stula A. · Psychiatric University Hospital Zurich, Research Department, Switzerland. · Pharmacopsychiatry. · Pubmed #10333163 No free full text.
Abstract: Competitive statistical methods were used in a meta-analysis of the data of 440 fluoxetine-treated and 437 moclobemide-treated patients in order to address the issue of the timing of recovery from depression, and to elucidate potential differences in the onset of action between the two different classes of antidepressants. In spite of large biochemical and pharmacological differences, fluoxetine and moclobemide turned out to be virtually identical with regard to the overall efficacy, proportions and time characteristics of premature withdrawal, and most notably, the time course of recovery. The onset of improvement occurred in the majority of cases within the first two weeks of treatment and was highly predictive for the outcome after six weeks. The analyses yielded no indication of a delayed onset of action of antidepressants. Given the apparent nonspecificity of antidepressants, together with their relatively modest response rates, future research will need consider whether mechanisms different from those related to the monoaminergic systems may be involved in the pathogenesis of depression.
|
| 21 |
Article Adult versus adolescent onset of smoking: how are mood disorders and other risk factors involved? 2009
Ajdacic-Gross V, Landolt K, Angst J, Gamma A, Merikangas KR, Gutzwiller F, Rössler W. · Psychiatric University Hospital, University of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland. · Addiction. · Pubmed #19624327 No free full text.
Abstract: AIMS: To examine the strength of association between smoking and mood disorders and the association between smoking and its traditional risk factors, comparing those who started smoking in adolescence with those who started smoking in early adulthood. DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: The analyses relied on prospective data from the Zurich Study. This longitudinal community study started in 1979 with a stratified sample of 591 participants aged 20/21 years, weighted towards those with mental disorders. Follow-up interviews were conducted at ages 23, 28, 30, 35 and 41. MEASUREMENTS: In this analysis the adult versus adolescent onset of smoking was regressed on the cumulative prevalence of mood disorders, personality characteristics measured by the Freiburg Personality Inventory, common risk factors such as parental smoking, conduct and school problems, troubles with the family and basic socio-demographic variables (sex, education). FINDINGS: In the Zurich Study cohort we found that 61.6% were former or current smokers, of whom 87% started smoking before the age of 20 and 13% after the age of 20. Adolescent onset of smoking was associated strongly with later major depression, dysthymia or bipolar disorders and, furthermore, with parental smoking, extroverted personality and discipline problems and rebelliousness in youth. However, only depression and dysthymia were associated with adult onset smoking and other risk factors associated with smoking were not so associated in this group. CONCLUSIONS: Correlates of smoking onset in adolescence are mainly not applicable to the onset of smoking in young adulthood. Smoking onset beyond adolescence is an open research issue.
|
| 22 |
Article Long-term depression versus episodic major depression: results from the prospective Zurich study of a community sample. 2009
Angst J, Gamma A, Rössler W, Ajdacic V, Klein DN. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Lenggstrasse 31, P.O. Box 1931, CH-8032 Zurich, Switzerland. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #18973954 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Clinical studies have demonstrated a great clinical relevance of long-term depression (LTD). Our study aims to characterise LTD in comparison with episodic (non-chronic) major depressive episodes (MDE) on the basis of data from a community sample. METHOD: The Zurich Cohort Study is a prospective study of young adults followed from age 20/21 to 40/41 with six interviews. The stratified sample consisted of two thirds high scorers and one third lower scorers on the Symptom Checklist-90 R (SCL-90-R). LTD was assessed from age 27/28 to 40/41 and defined as being symptomatic more days than not over 2 years plus the presence of work impairment. MDE and dysthymia were defined by DSM-III-R criteria. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of LTD was 5.7%, and of episodic MDE 20.9%. In both groups we found a similar preponderance of women. LTD subjects reported disturbed memory, feelings of inferiority, hopelessness, fear of everyday tasks, fear of being alone and thoughts of dying significantly more often than subjects with episodic MDE. Subjects with LTD had an earlier age of onset. 82% of them were treated over lifetime for depression compared to 61% with MDE. LTD subjects were less often married, less often in fulltime employment, more often unemployed, and more often receiving social benefits. LTD was comorbid with cardiac and respiratory syndromes, and LTD subjects were more frequently treated for insomnia and pain. They suffered significantly more from social phobia and benzodiazepine abuse; there was also a statistical trend to greater comorbidity with panic attacks, agoraphobia, obsessive-compulsive syndrome, binge eating and neurasthenia. Somatic and psychological well-being were also reduced. CONCLUSIONS: LTD is common, clinically more serious than episodic MDE and highly comorbid. LIMITATIONS: The sample is relatively small with an attrition rate of 38.5% over 20 years. The results cannot be generalised to persons over 40 years of age and may be dependent on the definition of LTD.
|
| 23 |
Article Refined insights into the pain-depression association in chronic pain patients. 2008
Angst F, Verra ML, Lehmann S, Aeschlimann A, Angst J. · RehaClinic Zurzach, Bad Zurzach, Switzerland. · Clin J Pain. · Pubmed #18936599 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The relationship between chronic pain and depression is controversial and the data on association show strong variation. This study aimed to provide refined correlation and regression data on the basis of categorical and continuous measures. METHODS: Cross-sectional assessment was based on standardized instruments that measure on a quasi-continuous scale, the Short Form-36, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale, and the Multidimensional Pain Inventory. Correlations between depression and pain were determined by the instruments' scales, with and without correction for confounders, and within chronic pain subgroups using multivariate regression analysis. RESULTS: In 273 chronic pain patients participating in an inpatient pain rehabilitation program, the Multidimensional Pain Inventory pain severity scale and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale showed maximum overall correlations of 0.27 to 0.29 (bivariate) and 0.30 (partial). The odds ratios for depression varied between 1.72 and 2.10 for different pain levels. Distinguishing 3 subtypes of pain patients, the pain-depression correlation was moderate in the "interpersonally distressed" subgroup (up to 0.57) (characterized by relatively low support, high punishing, low solicitous, and low distracting responses), weak in the "dysfunctional" subgroup (up to 0.26), and absent in the "adaptive copers/minimizers" subgroup (up to -0.09). CONCLUSIONS: The strengths of the pain-depression association and the "dose-response" relationship were both weak-weaker than to be expected if the hypothesis of a causal relationship were true. In the interpersonally distressed subgroup, the moderate association may have an impact on pain management, that is, pain could be treated by treatment of depression and vice versa.
|
| 24 |
Article Does psychomotor agitation in major depressive episodes indicate bipolarity? Evidence from the Zurich Study. 2009
Angst J, Gamma A, Benazzi F, Ajdacic V, Rössler W. · Psychiatric Hospital, Zurich University, Lenggstrasse 31, P.O. Box 1931, 8032 Zurich, Switzerland. · Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci. · Pubmed #18806921 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Kraepelin's partial interpretation of agitated depression as a mixed state of "manic-depressive insanity" (including the current concept of bipolar disorder) has recently been the focus of much research. This paper tested whether, how, and to what extent both psychomotor symptoms, agitation and retardation in depression are related to bipolarity and anxiety. METHOD: The prospective Zurich Study assessed psychiatric and somatic syndromes in a community sample of young adults (N = 591) (aged 20 at first interview) by six interviews over 20 years (1979-1999). Psychomotor symptoms of agitation and retardation were assessed by professional interviewers from age 22 to 40 (five interviews) on the basis of the observed and reported behaviour within the interview section on depression. Psychiatric diagnoses were strictly operationalised and, in the case of bipolar-II disorder, were broader than proposed by DSM-IV-TR and ICD-10. As indicators of bipolarity, the association with bipolar disorder, a family history of mania/hypomania/cyclothymia, together with hypomanic and cyclothymic temperament as assessed by the general behavior inventory (GBI) [15], and mood lability (an element of cyclothymic temperament) were used. RESULTS: Agitated and retarded depressive states were equally associated with the indicators of bipolarity and with anxiety. Longitudinally, agitation and retardation were significantly associated with each other (OR = 1.8, 95% CI = 1.0-3.2), and this combined group of major depressives showed stronger associations with bipolarity, with both hypomanic/cyclothymic and depressive temperamental traits, and with anxiety. Among agitated, non-retarded depressives, unipolar mood disorder was even twice as common as bipolar mood disorder. CONCLUSION: Combined agitated and retarded major depressive states are more often bipolar than unipolar, but, in general, agitated depression (with or without retardation) is not more frequently bipolar than retarded depression (with or without agitation), and pure agitated depression is even much less frequently bipolar than unipolar. The findings do not support the hypothesis that agitated depressive syndromes are mixed states. LIMITATIONS: The results are limited to a population up to the age of 40; bipolar-I disorders could not be analysed (small N).
|
| 25 |
Article Commentary on the paper of Smith, et al. 2008
Angst J. · Zurich University Psychiatric Hospital, Lenggstrasse, Zurich, Switzerland. · J Psychopharmacol. · Pubmed #18635718 No free full text.
This publication has no abstract.
|
Next |
|
|