Coronary Artery Disease: Moscucci M

King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Hirshfeld JW, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM, Anonymous00143, Anonymous00144, Anonymous00145. · No affiliation provided · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #17601554 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00180, King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM. · No affiliation provided · Circulation. · Pubmed #17592076 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Moscucci M. · No affiliation provided · Arch Intern Med. · Pubmed #17698678 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Moscucci M, Eagle KA. · No affiliation provided · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #15625338 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Gurm HS, Smith DE, Chetcuti SJ, Share D, Khanal S, Riba A, Carter AJ, Lalonde T, Kline-Rogers E, O'Donnell M, O'Neill W, Safian R, Moscucci M, Anonymous00081. · University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48103-0311, USA. · J Interv Cardiol. · Pubmed #17524111 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of bivalirudin based therapy among patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for stable coronary artery disease in a large multicenter registry. BACKGROUND: The REPLACE I trial demonstrated the non-inferiority of a strategy of bivalirudin compared with heparin and glycoprotein (GP) IIbIIIa inhibition in patients undergoing PCI. There is a paucity of outcome data with bivalirudin use in the setting of real-world PCI practice. METHODS: We evaluated the outcome of 11,719 patients who underwent elective PCI for stable coronary artery disease (CAD) from 2002 to 2004 in a large regional consortium, and who were treated with bivalirudin (n = 2051) or with heparin and GP IIbIIIa inhibitors (n = 9,668). The primary endpoints were transfusion and in-hospital major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) defined as the composite of death, MI, stroke, and any coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) or target lesion revascularization. RESULTS: Compared with patients who received heparin plus GP IIbIIIa inhibitors, patients who received bivalirudin had a similar incidence of post-procedural MI, stroke, in-hospital death, MACE (2.88 vs. 2.48, P = 0.30), or transfusion (2.83% vs. 2.41%, P = 0.27). Patients at greater risk of bleeding were more likely to be treated with bivalirudin. After adjusting for the propensity to receive bivalirudin and for baseline co-morbidities, there was no difference in the odds of MACE or the need for transfusion between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with heparin plus GP IIbIIIa inhibition, use of bivalirudin in patients undergoing PCI for stable CAD is associated with similar ischemic and bleeding complications. Given the ease of administration and lower cost, bivalirudin provides an attractive treatment option in this patient population.

Raff GL, Chinnaiyan KM, Share DA, Goraya TY, Kazerooni EA, Moscucci M, Gentry RE, Abidov A, Anonymous00130. · Cardiology Division, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 W 13 Mile Rd, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #19509381 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: Cardiac computed tomography angiography (CCTA) can accurately diagnose coronary artery disease, but radiation dose from this procedure is of concern. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether a collaborative radiation dose-reduction program would be associated with reduced radiation dose in patients undergoing CCTA in a statewide registry over a 1-year period and to define its effect on image quality. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: A prospective, controlled, nonrandomized study conducted during a control period (July-August 2007), an intervention period (September 2007-April 2008), and a follow-up period (May-June 2008) at 15 hospital imaging centers participating in the Advanced Cardiovascular Imaging Consortium in Michigan, which included small community hospitals and large academic medical centers. A total of 4995 sequential patients undergoing CCTA for suspected coronary artery disease were enrolled; 4862 patients (97.3%) had complete radiation data for analysis. INTERVENTION: A best-practice CCTA scan model was used, which included minimized scan range, heart rate reduction, electrocardiographic-gated tube current modulation, and reduced tube voltage in suitable patients. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcomes included dose-length product and effective radiation dose from all phases of the CCTA scan. Secondary outcomes were image quality assessed by a 4-point scale (1 indicated excellent; 2, good; 3, adequate; and 4, nondiagnostic) and frequency of diagnostic-quality scans. RESULTS: Compared with the control period, patients' estimated median radiation dose in the follow-up period was reduced by 53.3% (dose-length product decreased from 1493 mGy x cm [interquartile range {IQR}, 855-1823 mGy x cm] to 697 mGy x cm [IQR, 407-1163 mGy x cm]; P < .001) and effective dose from 21 mSv (IQR, 12-26 mSv) to 10 mSv (IQR, 6-16 mSv) (P < .001). The greatest reduction in dose occurred at low-volume sites. There were no significant changes in median image quality assessment during the control period compared with the follow-up period (median image quality of 2 [images rated as good] vs median image quality of 2; P = .13) or frequency of diagnostic-quality scans (554/620 patients [89%] vs 769/835 patients [92%]; P = .07). CONCLUSION: Consistent application of currently available dose-reduction techniques was associated with a marked reduction in estimated radiation doses in a statewide CCTA registry, without impairment of image quality. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00640068.

Boyden TF, Nallamothu BK, Moscucci M, Chan PS, Grossman PM, Tsai TT, Chetcuti SJ, Bates ER, Gurm HS. · University Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor VA Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #17493468 No free full text.

Abstract: Diabetes mellitus is a major risk factor for restenosis in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention. Randomized controlled trials comparing drug-eluting stents (DESs) with bare metal stents (BMSs) showed a marked decrease in in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization with DESs in the total patient population enrolled in the studies, including patients with diabetes. However, it remains unclear whether the antirestenotic benefit of DESs is preserved in the high-risk diabetic subgroup. MEDLINE, EMBASE, ISI Web of Knowledge, Current Contents, International Pharmaceutical Abstracts, and recent Scientific Sessions databases were searched to identify relevant clinical trials comparing DESs with BMSs. A randomized controlled trial was included if it provided outcome data for patients with diabetes for > or =1 of the following: late lumen loss, in-stent restenosis, or target lesion revascularization. Data were combined using fixed-effects models, and standard tests for heterogeneity were performed. Eight studies with 1,520 patients with diabetes were identified that reported > or =1 outcome of interest. Mean late lumen losses (7 studies) were 0.93 mm (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.510 to 1.348) with BMSs and 0.18 mm (95% CI -0.088 to +0.446) with DESs. For patients receiving a DES, this translated into a marked decrease in in-stent restenosis (7 studies, RR 0.14, 95% CI 0.10 to 0.22, p <0.001) and target lesion revascularization (8 studies, RR 0.34, 95% CI 0.26 to 0.45, p <0.001). DES use is associated with a marked decrease in in-stent restenosis and target lesion revascularization in patients with diabetes. In conclusion, the analysis supports the current widespread use of DESs in these high-risk patients.

Moscucci M, Share D, Smith D, O'Donnell MJ, Riba A, McNamara R, Lalonde T, Defranco AC, Patel K, Kline Rogers E, D'Haem C, Karve M, Eagle KA. · Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-0311, USA. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #16098426 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The aim of our study was to evaluate the volume-outcome relationship in a large, quality-controlled, contemporary percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI) database. BACKGROUND: Whether the relationship between physician volume of PCI and outcomes still exists in the era of coronary stents is unclear. METHODS: Data on 18,504 consecutive PCIs performed by 165 operators in calendar year 2002 were prospectively collected in a regional consortium. Operators' volume was divided into quintiles (1 to 33, 34 to 89, 90 to 139, 140 to 206, and 207 to 582 procedures/year). The primary end point was a composite of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) including death, coronary artery bypass grafting, stroke or transient ischemic attack, myocardial infarction, and repeat PCI at the same site during the index hospital stay. RESULTS: The unadjusted MACE rate was significantly higher in quintiles one and two of operator volume when compared with quintile five (7.38% and 6.13% vs. 4.15%, p = 0.002 and p = 0.0001, respectively). A similar trend was observed for in-hospital death. After adjustment for comorbidities, patients treated by low volume operators had a 63% increased odds of MACE (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.29 to 2.06, p < 0.0001 for quintile [Q]1; adjusted OR 1.63, 95% CI 1.34 to 1.90, p < 0.0001 for Q2 vs. Q5), but not of in-hospital death. Overall, high volume operators had better outcomes than low volume operators in low-risk and high-risk patients. CONCLUSIONS: Although the relationship between operator volume and in-hospital mortality is no longer significant, the relationship between volume and any adverse outcome is still present. Technological advancements have not yet completely offset the influence of procedural volume on proficiency of PCIs.

Moscucci M, Eagle KA, Share D, Smith D, De Franco AC, O'Donnell M, Kline-Rogers E, Jani SM, Brown DL. · University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #15936602 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to determine the potential effect of public reporting on case selection for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that public reporting of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) mortality might result in case selection bias and in denial of care to or out migration of high-risk patients. The potential effect of public reporting on case selection for PCI is unknown. METHODS: We compared demographics, indications, and outcomes of 11,374 patients included in a multicenter (eight hospitals) PCI database in Michigan where no public reporting is present, with 69,048 patients in a statewide (34 hospitals) PCI database in New York, where public reporting is present. The primary end point was in-hospital mortality. RESULTS: Patients in Michigan more frequently underwent PCI for acute myocardial infarction (14.4% vs. 8.7%, p < 0.0001) and cardiogenic shock (2.56% vs. 0.38%, p < 0.0001) than those in New York. The Michigan cohort also had a higher prevalence of congestive heart failure and extracardiac vascular disease. The unadjusted in-hospital mortality rate was significantly lower in New York than in Michigan (0.83% vs. 1.54%, p < 0.0001; odds ratio [OR] 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.45 to 0.63). However, after adjustment for comorbidities, there was no significant difference in mortality between the two groups (adjusted OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.84 to 1.31, p = 0.70, c-statistic 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: There are significant differences in case mix between patients undergoing PCI in Michigan and New York that result in marked differences in unadjusted mortality rates. A propensity in New York toward not intervening on higher-risk patients because of fear of public reporting of high mortality rates is a possible explanation for these differences.

Chetcuti SJ, Moscucci M. · Division of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Michigan Health System, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48103, USA. · Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. · Pubmed #15170714 No free full text.

Abstract: We report a case of restenosis following ostial stenting of the right coronary artery with protrusion of the stent into the aorta. Treatment was only possible after a guidewire advanced through a lower strut was used to lever the guide, and a second guidewire was advanced through the true lumen.

Moscucci M, O'Donnell M, Share D, Maxwell-Eward A, Kline-Rogers E, De Franco AC, Meengs WL, Clark VL, McGinnity JG, De Gregorio M, Patel K, Eagle KA. · University of Michigan, Division of Cardiology, Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium Coordinating Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #14556874 No free full text.

Abstract: We evaluated the frequency and prognosis of emergency coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction in a large, multicenter registry of contemporary PCI. In this study, emergency CABG occurred in 2% of cases, and was associated with high in-hospital mortality (20%) and with a high incidence of stroke (8%), renal failure requiring dialysis (8.3%), and bleeding (63.3%).

Freeman RV, O'Donnell M, Share D, Meengs WL, Kline-Rogers E, Clark VL, DeFranco AC, Eagle KA, McGinnity JG, Patel K, Maxwell-Eward A, Bondie D, Moscucci M, Anonymous00088. · Division of Cardiology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #12423705 No free full text.

Abstract: This study was undertaken to determine the incidence, risk factors, and in-hospital outcome of nephropathy requiring dialysis (NRD) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and to evaluate the role of a weight- and creatinine-adjusted maximum radiographic contrast dose (MRCD) on NRD. Data were obtained from a registry of 16,592 PCIs. The data were divided into development and test sets. Univariate predictors were identified and a multivariate logistic regression model was developed. The MRCD was calculated for each patient as: MRCD = 5 ml x body weight (kilograms)/serum creatinine (milligrams per deciliter). Predictive accuracy was assessed by receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. In the development set, 41 patients (0.44%) developed NRD with a subsequent in-hospital mortality rate of 39.0%. NRD increased with worsening baseline renal dysfunction. Other risk factors included peripheral vascular disease, diabetes mellitus, congestive heart failure, and cardiogenic shock. There was a direct relation between the number of risk factors and NRD. After adjustment for baseline risk factors, MRCD was the strongest independent predictor of NRD (adjusted odds ratio 6.2, 95% confidence interval 3.0 to 12.8). NRD and in-hospital mortality were both significantly higher in patients who exceeded the MRCD compared with patients who did not (p <0.001). In conclusion, NRD following PCI is a rare complication with a poor prognosis. Baseline clinical characteristics identify patients at greatest risk for NRD. Optimization of procedural variables such as timing of the intervention relative to the diagnostic catheterization, staging coronary procedures, or dosing within the MRCD may help reduce the risk of this complication in high-risk patients. A risk prediction tool for NRD with guidelines for prevention is presented.

Spencer FA, Santopinto JJ, Gore JM, Goldberg RJ, Fox KA, Moscucci M, White K, Gurfinkel EP. · Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Massachusetts Medical School, 55 Lake Avenue North, Worcester, MA 01655, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #12423703 No free full text.

Abstract: The long-term use of aspirin (ASA) reduces the risk of subsequent acute coronary syndromes in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). It is less clear whether ASA therapy benefits patients who develop an acute coronary syndrome despite its use. Baseline characteristics, type of acute coronary syndrome, and in-hospital events were compared on the basis of previous use of ASA in 11,388 patients with and without a history of CAD presenting to 94 multinational hospitals. A total of 73.0% of patients with a history of CAD (n = 4,974) were previously on long-term ASA therapy compared with 19.4% of patients without a history of CAD (n = 6,414). After multivariate regression analysis controlling for various potentially confounding factors, patients with a history of CAD who were previously taking ASA were significantly less likely to present with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI) (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 0.52, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.44 to 0.61) or die during hospitalization (OR 0.69, 95% CI 0.50 to 0.95) in comparison to patients who were not taking ASA. Patients without a history of CAD and who were previously taking ASA also had a lower risk of developing ST-segment elevation MI (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.40) and a trend toward a decreased hospital death rate (OR 0.77, 95% CI 0.55 to 1.07). These results demonstrate that patients with a history of CAD who present with an acute coronary syndrome despite prior ASA use have less severe clinical presentation, fewer hospital complications, and lower in-hospital death rates than patients not previously taking ASA.

Simonini A, Moscucci M, Muller DW, Bates ER, Pagani FD, Burdick MD, Strieter RM. · Department of Internal Medicine, Division of Cardiology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA. · Circulation. · Pubmed #10747344 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Interleukin-8 (IL-8), a CXC chemokine that induces the migration and proliferation of endothelial cells and smooth muscle cells, is a potent angiogenic factor that may play a role in atherosclerosis. Previously, IL-8 has been reported in atherosclerotic lesions and circulating macrophages from patients with atherosclerosis. Therefore, we sought to determine whether IL-8 plays a role in mediating angiogenic activity in atherosclerosis. METHODS AND RESULTS: Homogenates from 16 patients undergoing directional coronary atherectomy (DCA) and control samples from the internal mammary artery (IMA) of 7 patients undergoing bypass graft surgery were assessed for IL-8 content by specific ELISA, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization for IL-8 mRNA. The contribution of IL-8 to net angiogenic activity was assessed using the rat cornea micropocket assay and cultured cells. IL-8 expression was significantly elevated in DCA samples compared with IMA samples (1.71+/-0.6 versus 0.05+/-0.03 ng/mg of total protein; P<0.01). Positive immunolocalization of IL-8 was found exclusively in DCA tissue sections, and it correlated with the presence of factor VIII-related antigen. In situ reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction revealed the expression of IL-8 mRNA in DCA tissue. Corneal neovascular response, defined by ingrowth of capillary sprouts toward the implant, was markedly positive with DCA pellets, but no constitutive vessel ingrowth was seen with IMA specimens. Neutralizing IL-8 attenuated both the in vivo corneal neovascular response and the in vitro proliferation of cultured cells. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that, in human coronary atherosclerosis, IL-8 is an important mediator of angiogenesis and may contribute to plaque formation via its angiogenic properties.