| 1 |
Guideline Clinical competence in myocardial perfusion scintigraphic stress testing: general training guidelines and assessment. 2007
Jones I, Latus K, Bartle L, Gardner M, Parkin V, Anonymous00259. · Nuclear Medicine Department, Derby Hospitals NHS Trust, Uttoxeter Road, Derby, UK. · Nucl Med Commun. · Pubmed #17538400 No free full text.
Abstract: The suggestion by the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE) to more than triple the number of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy (MPS) procedures carried out by the NHS each year is a challenge both in terms of numbers of gamma cameras available to carry out the scans and qualified staff to supervise stress tests. In the past, exercise and pharmacological stress testing have been supervised only by doctors but, increasingly, this is taken on by suitably trained non-medical professionals such as nurses, radiographers and clinical technologists. The expansion of the numbers of non-medical professionals qualified to supervise stress testing will be key to meeting NICE's recommendations. This paper sets out how potential new stressors should be identified, what their training should cover and discusses the standards of competence they should meet. It provides guidelines for training non-medical stressors to perform a safe and efficient stress test during MPS and advice for maintaining competency.
|
| 2 |
Article Side effect profile and tolerability of adenosine myocardial perfusion scintigraphy in patients with mild asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. 2007
Reyes E, Loong CY, Wechalekar K, Latus K, Anagnostopoulos C, Underwood SR. · National Heart and Lung Institute, Imperial College London, London, England. · J Nucl Cardiol. · Pubmed #18022109 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Adenosine may cause bronchoconstriction in subjects with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recent evidence suggests that this effect may be dependent on the severity of disease. This study investigates the tolerability of adenosine stress in patients with mild asthma or COPD undergoing myocardial perfusion scintigraphy. METHODS AND RESULTS: In this case-control study patients with known or suspected mild asthma or COPD were pretreated with an inhaled beta(2)-adrenergic agonist and adenosine titrated up to the maximal dose of 140 microg x kg(-1) x min(-1) over a period of 6 minutes. The occurrence of side effects and test tolerability were compared between the airway disease group and 72 control subjects. Of 1261 patients, 124 had known or suspected airway disease; of these, 72 (58%) were suitable for adenosine stress. The proportion of tests completed as per protocol in the asthma/COPD group was similar to that of control subjects (93% vs 100%, P = .06). Dyspnea (n = 38 [53%] in asthma/COPD group vs n = 25 [35%] in control group, P = .03) and chest pain (n = 14 [19%] in asthma/COPD group vs n = 16 [22%] in control group, P = .7) were the most common side effects, and these were mostly mild and well tolerated. Bronchospasm occurred in 5 patients with asthma/COPD but reverted shortly after discontinuation of the adenosine infusion. Aminophylline was not required in any case. CONCLUSIONS: A stepwise 6-minute adenosine infusion with prophylactic beta(2)-adrenergic agonist is safe and well tolerated in patients with mild asthma or COPD.
|
|
|