Coronary Artery Disease: Hannan EL

King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Hirshfeld JW, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM, Anonymous00143, Anonymous00144, Anonymous00145. · No affiliation provided · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #17601554 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00180, King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM. · No affiliation provided · Circulation. · Pubmed #17592076 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

King SB, Hannan EL. · No affiliation provided · Circulation. · Pubmed #18852362 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hannan EL. · No affiliation provided · Ital Heart J. · Pubmed #14699702 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Hannan EL, Racz M, Holmes DR, Sharma S, Katz S, Walford G, King SB, Clark LT, Jones RH. · School of Public Health, University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY 12144-3456, USA. · Am Heart J. · Pubmed #17719304 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Drug-eluting stents are now used in most percutaneous coronary interventions. There are only 2 approved devices: sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) and paclitaxel-eluting stents (PES). Only a few population-based studies have compared their patient outcomes. METHODS: All New York State patients undergoing SES or PES in nonfederal hospitals in the state between April 1 and December 31, 2004, except those with a previous revascularization, left main coronary artery disease, or a recent myocardial infarction (MI) or shock (4867 patients with PES and 6914 with SES) were followed up through the end of 2005. We compared SES and PES with respect to inhospital and 18-month mortality, 18-month mortality/MI, and subsequent target vessel and target lesion revascularization (TVR and TLR) after adjusting for differences in patient risk factors. RESULTS: By 18 months after receiving a PES, 4.0% of the patients died compared with 4.1% for SES patients, 5.9% of PES patients experienced mortality/MI compared with 6.3% of SES patients, 6.8% of the PES patients had a subsequent TVR within 18 months compared with 7.8% for SES patients, and 4.5% of the PES patients had a subsequent TLR within 18 months compared with 5.3% for SES patients. The respective adjusted hazards ratios (PES/SES) for these adverse outcomes were 1.02 (95% CI 0.82-1.26, P = .86), 0.94 (95% CI 0.78-1.13, P = .52), 0.89 (95% CI 0.75-1.06, P = .20), and 0.86 (95% CI 0.70-1.05, P = .14). CONCLUSIONS: Patients receiving PES and SES do not have significantly different 18-month mortality, mortality/MI, subsequent TVR, or subsequent TLR rates.

Wu C, Hannan EL, Walford G, Faxon DP. · University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA. · Ann Thorac Surg. · Pubmed #18805151 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Limited contemporary information is available on outcomes for patients with unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease who are revascularized. METHODS: We examined the relative frequency, severity of illness, and outcomes of stenting and coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery for treating unprotected LMCA disease in New York between January 1, 2000 and December 31, 2004. A total of 16,336 (98.7%) patients who underwent CABG surgery and 212 (1.3%) who underwent stenting were included in this study. RESULTS: Stent patients had higher preprocedural severity of illness (eg, they were older, more likely to be female, and had more comorbidities). A total of 135 stent patients were matched to 135 CABG patients on baseline characteristics identified by a propensity model as predictors of type of procedure received. At the end of follow-up on December 31, 2004, the respective 2-year survival rates were 94.1% and 82.0% (hazard ratio = 0.32, p = 0.005) for the 135 pairs of matched CABG and stent patients. The respective 2-year rates for freedom from subsequent revascularization were 93.7% and 62.7% (hazard ratio = 0.15, p < 0.001). In the drug-eluting stent era between October 1, 2003 and December 31, 2004, the same trends in mortality (hazard ratio = 0.73, p = 0.69) and repeat revascularization (hazard ratio = 0.10, p = 0.03) were observed among the 56 pairs of matched CABG and drug-eluting stent patients. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with LMCA disease who needed coronary revascularization received CABG surgery; stent patients were sicker. This study found that surgery patients experienced lower risk of long-term death and repeat revascularization. However, more studies comparing these procedures are needed, especially in the drug-eluting stent era.

van Gameren M, Kappetein AP, Steyerberg EW, Venema AC, Berenschot EA, Hannan EL, Bogers AJ, Takkenberg JJ. · Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. <> · Ann Thorac Surg. · Pubmed #18291172 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The EuroSCORE (European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation) is often used to benchmark and predict hospital mortality after cardiac surgery. Based mainly upon coronary surgery patients, EuroSCORE may not be optimal for valve surgery patients. We evaluated the New York (NY) State dedicated valve surgery models and compared their performance to the EuroSCORE model. METHODS: Required model variables were collected prospectively for all patients, followed by calculation of predictive mortality rates using the logistic and additive EuroSCORE, the logistic and additive NY State models for valve surgery without concomitant coronary surgery (isolated valve surgery) and the logistic and additive NY State models for combined valve and coronary surgery. RESULTS: Observed mortality was 2.8% (25 of 904) for isolated valve surgery and 6.8% (27 of 395) for valve plus coronary surgery. Logistic NY State and EuroSCORE expected mortality for isolated valve surgery was respectively 3.0% and 6.1%, and for valve plus coronary surgery 5.9% and 7.8%. The logistic NY State model for isolated valve surgery showed better discrimination (c-index 0.86 versus 0.76) and calibration than the logistic EuroSCORE. Discriminatory power for the logistic NY State model for valve plus coronary surgery was comparable to the logistic EuroSCORE (c-index 0.74 versus 0.72), as was calibration. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that dedicated risk models for valve surgery may be useful to provide more valid estimates of hospital mortality after heart valve surgery. Further exploration is needed to demonstrate general applicability of our results and assess the possible additional value of separate models for isolated valve surgery and valve plus coronary artery surgery, or aortic and mitral valve surgery, or both.

Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Smith CR, Higgins RS, Carlson RE, Jones RH. · Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, University at Albany, Albany, NY 12144-3456, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #18216353 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have compared the outcomes of two competing interventions for multivessel coronary artery disease: coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and coronary stenting. However, little information has become available since the introduction of drug-eluting stents. METHODS: We identified patients with multivessel disease who received drug-eluting stents or underwent CABG in New York State between October 1, 2003, and December 31, 2004, and we compared adverse outcomes (death, death or myocardial infarction, or repeat revascularization) through December 31, 2005, after adjustment for differences in baseline risk factors among the patients. RESULTS: In comparison with treatment with a drug-eluting stent, CABG was associated with lower 18-month rates of death and of death or myocardial infarction both for patients with three-vessel disease and for patients with two-vessel disease. Among patients with three-vessel disease who underwent CABG, as compared with those who received a stent, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.80 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.65 to 0.97) and the adjusted survival rate was 94.0% versus 92.7% (P=0.03); the adjusted hazard ratio for death or myocardial infarction was 0.75 (95% CI, 0.63 to 0.89) and the adjusted rate of survival free from myocardial infarction was 92.1% versus 89.7% (P<0.001). Among patients with two-vessel disease who underwent CABG, as compared with those who received a stent, the adjusted hazard ratio for death was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.57 to 0.89) and the adjusted survival rate was 96.0% versus 94.6% (P=0.003); the adjusted hazard ratio for death or myocardial infarction was 0.71 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.87) and the adjusted rate of survival free from myocardial infarction was 94.5% versus 92.5% (P<0.001). Patients undergoing CABG also had lower rates of repeat revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with multivessel disease, CABG continues to be associated with lower mortality rates than does treatment with drug-eluting stents and is also associated with lower rates of death or myocardial infarction and repeat revascularization.

Hannan EL, Wu C, Bennett EV, Carlson RE, Culliford AT, Gold JP, Higgins RS, Isom OW, Smith CR, Jones RH. · University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, New York, USA. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #16458152 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this research was to develop a risk index for in-hospital mortality for coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery. BACKGROUND: Risk indexes for CABG surgery are used to assess patients' operative risk as well as to profile hospitals and surgeons. None has been developed using data from a population-based region in the U.S. for many years. METHODS: Data from New York's Cardiac Surgery Reporting System in 2002 were used to develop a statistical model that predicts mortality and to create a risk index based on a relatively small number of patient risk factors. The fit of the index was tested by applying it to another year (2003) of New York data and testing the correspondence of expected and observed mortality rates for each risk score in the index. RESULTS: The risk index contains a total of 10 risk factors (age, female gender, hemodynamic state, ejection fraction, pre-procedural myocardial infarction, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, calcified ascending aorta, peripheral arterial disease, renal failure, and previous open heart operations). The score possible for each variable ranges from 0 to 5, and total risk scores possible range from 0 to 34. The highest score observed for any patient was 22, and 93% of the patients had scores of 8 or lower. When the risk index was applied to another year of New York data with a considerably lower mortality rate, the C-statistic was 0.782. CONCLUSIONS: The risk index appears to be a valuable tool for predicting patient risk when applied to another year of New York data. It should now be tested against other risk indexes in a variety of geographical regions.

Halm EA, Hannan EL, Rojas M, Tuhrim S, Riles TS, Rockman CB, Chassin MR. · Department of Health Policy, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, NY 10029, USA. · J Vasc Surg. · Pubmed #16171582 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The net benefit for patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy is critically dependent on the risk of perioperative stroke and death. Information about risk factors can aid appropriate selection of patients and inform efforts to reduce complication rates. This study identifies the clinical, radiographic, surgical, and anesthesia variables that are independent predictors of deaths and stroke following carotid endarterectomy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy in 1997 and 1998 by 64 surgeons in 6 hospitals was performed (N = 1972). Detailed information on clinical, radiographic, surgical, anesthesia, and medical management variables and deaths or strokes within 30 days of surgery were abstracted from inpatient and outpatient records. Multivariate logistic regression models identified independent clinical characteristics and operative techniques associated with risk-adjusted rates of combined death and nonfatal stroke as well as all strokes. RESULTS: Death or stroke occurred in 2.28% of patients without carotid symptoms, 2.93% of those with carotid transient ischemic attacks, and 7.11% of those with strokes (P < .0001). Three clinical factors increased the risk-adjusted odds of complications: stroke as the indication for surgery (odds ratio [OR], 2.84; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.55-5.20), presence of active coronary artery disease (OR, 3.58; 95% CI = 1.53-8.36), and contralateral carotid stenosis > or =50% (OR, 2.32; 95% CI = 1.33-4.02). Two surgical techniques reduced the risk-adjusted odds of death or stroke: use of local anesthesia (OR, 0.30; 95% CI = 0.16-0.58) and patch closure (OR, 0.43; 95% CI = 0.24-0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Information about these risk factors may help physicians weigh the risks and benefits of carotid endarterectomy in individual patients. Two operative techniques (use of local anesthesia and patch closure) may lower the risk of death or stroke.

Hannan EL, Wu C, Walford G, King SB, Holmes DR, Ambrose JA, Sharma S, Katz S, Clark LT, Jones RH. · State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA. · Circulation. · Pubmed #16103238 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Most studies that are the basis of recommended volume thresholds for percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs) predate the routine use of stent placement. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from New York's Percutaneous Coronary Interventions Reporting System in 1998 to 2000 (n=107 713) were used to examine the impact of annual hospital volume and annual operator volume on in-hospital mortality, same-day coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery after adjustment for differences in patients' severity of illness. For a hospital-volume threshold of 400, the odds ratios for low-volume hospitals versus high-volume hospitals were 1.98 (95% CI, 1.17, 3.35) for in-hospital mortality, 2.07 (95% CI, 1.36, 3.15) for same-day CABG surgery, and 1.51 (95% CI, 1.03, 2.21) for same-stay CABG surgery. For an operator-volume threshold of 75, the odds ratios for low-volume versus high-volume operators were 1.65 (95% CI, 1.05, 2.60) for same-day CABG surgery and 1.55 (95% CI, 1.10, 2.18) for same-stay CABG surgery. Operator volume was not significantly associated with mortality. Also, for hospital volumes below 400 and operator volumes below 75, the respective odds of mortality, same-day CABG surgery, and same-stay CABG surgery were 5.92, 4.02, and 3.92 times the odds for hospital volumes of 400 or higher and operator volumes of 75 or higher. CONCLUSIONS: Higher-volume operators and hospitals continue to experience lower risk-adjusted PCI outcome rates.

Weeks WB, Bazos DA, Bott DM, Lombardo R, Racz MJ, Hannan EL, Fisher ES. · Veterans' Rural Health Initiative, VA Medical Center, White River Junction, VT, USA. · Health Serv Res. · Pubmed #16033499 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine whether patients' use of the Veterans Health Administration health care system (VHA) is an independent risk factor for mortality following coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) in the private sector in New York. DATA SOURCES: VHA administrative and New York Department of Health Cardiac Surgery Reporting System (CSRS) databases for surgeries performed in 1999 and 2000. STUDY DESIGN: Prospective cohort study comparing observed, expected, and risk-adjusted mortality rates following private sector CABG for 2,326 male New York State residents aged 45 years and older who used the VHA (VHA users) and 21,607 who did not (non-VHA users). DATA COLLECTION METHODS: We linked VHA administrative databases to New York's CSRS to identify VHA users who obtained CABG in the private sector in New York in 1999 and 2000. Using CSRS risk factors and previously validated risk-adjustment model, we compared patient characteristics and expected and risk-adjusted mortality rates of VHA users to non-VHA users. PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Compared with non-VHA users, patients undergoing private sector CABG who had used the VHA were older, had more severe cardiac disease, and were more likely to have the following comorbidities associated with increased risk of mortality: diabetes, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, cerebrovascular disease, peripheral vascular disease, and history of stroke (p<.001 for all); a calcified aorta (p=.009); and a high creatinine level (p=.003). Observed (2.28 versus 1.80 percent) and expected (2.48 versus 1.78 percent) mortality rates were higher for VHA users than for non-VHA users. The risk-adjusted mortality rate for VHA users (1.70 percent; 95 percent confidence interval [CI]: 1.27-2.22) was not statistically different than that for the non-VHA users (1.87 percent; 95 percent CI: 1.69-2.06). Use of the VHA was not an independent risk factor for mortality in the risk-adjustment model. CONCLUSIONS: Although VHA users had a greater illness burden, use of the VHA was not found to be an independent risk factor for mortality following private sector CABG in New York. The New York Department of Health risk adjustment model adequately applies to veterans who obtain CABG in the private sector in New York.

Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Walford G, Jones RH, Ryan TJ, Bennett E, Culliford AT, Isom OW, Gold JP, Rose EA. · University at Albany, State University of New York, Albany, NY, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #15917382 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Several studies have compared outcomes for coronary-artery bypass grafting (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), but most were done before the availability of stenting, which has revolutionized the latter approach. METHODS: We used New York's cardiac registries to identify 37,212 patients with multivessel disease who underwent CABG and 22,102 patients with multivessel disease who underwent PCI from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2000. We determined the rates of death and subsequent revascularization within three years after the procedure in various groups of patients according to the number of diseased vessels and the presence or absence of involvement of the left anterior descending coronary artery. The rates of adverse outcomes were adjusted by means of proportional-hazards methods to account for differences in patients' severity of illness before revascularization. RESULTS: Risk-adjusted survival rates were significantly higher among patients who underwent CABG than among those who received a stent in all of the anatomical subgroups studied. For example, the adjusted hazard ratio for the long-term risk of death after CABG relative to stent implantation was 0.64 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.56 to 0.74) for patients with three-vessel disease with involvement of the proximal left anterior descending coronary artery and 0.76 (95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.96) for patients with two-vessel disease with involvement of the nonproximal left anterior descending coronary artery. Also, the three-year rates of revascularization were considerably higher in the stenting group than in the CABG group (7.8 percent vs. 0.3 percent for subsequent CABG and 27.3 percent vs. 4.6 percent for subsequent PCI). CONCLUSIONS: For patients with two or more diseased coronary arteries, CABG is associated with higher adjusted rates of long-term survival than stenting.

Peterson ED, Alexander KP, Malenka DJ, Hannan EL, O'Conner GT, McCallister BD, Weintraub WS, Grover FL, Anonymous00396. · The Outcomes Research and Assessment Group, The Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, NC 27715, USA. · Am Heart J. · Pubmed #15389237 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Very elderly patients are increasingly referred for revascularization yet have been underrepresented in both prior percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and coronary bypass surgery (CABG) clinical trials. We pooled the largest PCI and CABG clinical registries in the United States to better understand revascularization procedure use, risks and outcomes in patients aged > or =75 years. METHODS: Six PCI registries (n = 48,439) and 8 CABG registries (n = 180,709) voluntarily contributed all procedural data in patients aged > or =75 years from 1990 through 1999. Patient characteristics, procedural process, and inhospital mortality and morbidity outcomes were evaluated. Risk factors for mortality in elderly patients were identified and compared across registries using standardized multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: Between the years 1991 and 1999, the proportion of patients aged > or =75 years undergoing revascularization was on the rise (10% increase). Pooled estimates of inhospital mortality following PCI during this decade was 3.0% (range 1.5%-5.2% among databases), and following CABG was 5.9% (range 4.9%-8.4% among databases). Mortality rates declined significantly in older patients for both PCI and CABG over this decade. While process measures varied across registries, the most significant predictors of inhospital death (procedural urgency, left ventricular dysfunction, prior CABG) seemed consistent across all sites. CONCLUSION: Over the last decade, the use of coronary revascularization in elderly patients increased and outcomes improved. While age remains a determinant of procedural risk, this risk varies markedly among elderly patients, emphasizing the need for individualized risk assessments.

Rosenthal GE, Vaughan Sarrazin M, Hannan EL. · Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa 52242, USA. · Med Care. · Pubmed #12665716 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Compare severity-adjusted in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) in VA and private sector hospitals in two geographic regions. RESEARCH DESIGN: Retrospective Cohort Study. SUBJECTS: Consecutive male patients undergoing CABG from October 1993 to December 1996 in: 43 VA hospitals with cardiac surgery programs (n = 19,266); 32 hospitals in New York (NY) State (n = 44,247); and 10 hospitals in Northeast (NE) Ohio (n = 9696). METHODS: Demographic and clinical data were abstracted from medical records. Logistic regression analysis identified 10 independent patient-level predictors (P <0.01) of in-hospital mortality: age, prior CABG, angioplasty before CABG, ejection fraction, diabetes, peripheral vascular disease, congestive heart failure (CHF), cerebrovascular disease, renal insufficiency, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). RESULTS: Unadjusted mortality was higher in VA patients than in NY or NE Ohio patients (3.5% vs. 2.0%, and 2.2%, respectively). Mortality decreased (P <0.001) with increasing volume (3.6% in low [<500 cases], 3.0% in moderate [500-1000 cases], and 2.0% in high [>1000 cases] volume hospitals). Median volume was lower in VA than private sector hospitals (410 vs. 1520), and no VA hospitals were classified as high volume. Adjusting for patient-level predictors and volume, the odds of death was higher in VA patients, relative to private sector patients (OR, 1.34; 95% CI, 1.11-1.63; P <0.001). In stratified analyses, the odds of death in VA patients was similar in low volume hospitals (OR, 0.86; P = 0.39), but higher in moderate volume hospitals (OR, 1.50; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: VA hospitals had lower CABG volume than private sector hospitals in NY and NE Ohio, and higher in-hospital mortality. However, the difference in mortality was limited to moderate-volume hospitals. These findings suggest that hospital volume is an important modifier in comparisons of CABG mortality in VA and private sector hospitals. The higher mortality in VA hospitals may, in part, be caused by differences in surgical capacity and patient demand that lead to lower volume cardiac surgery programs.

Szczech LA, Reddan DN, Owen WF, Califf R, Racz M, Jones RH, Hannan EL. · Division of Nephrology, Department of Medicine, Duke Institute for Renal Outcomes Research and Health Policy, and Duke Clinical Research Institute, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA. · Kidney Int. · Pubmed #11422764 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Acute myocardial infarction, cardiac arrest, and other cardiac events are the major cause of mortality among patients with renal insufficiency. Previous studies of interventions for coronary artery disease among patients with renal insufficiency have not controlled for potentially confounding factors such as coronary artery disease severity and left ventricular function. This study investigates the comparative survival for patients with renal insufficiency and coronary artery disease following coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery as compared with percutaneous coronary artery intervention (PCI), while controlling for confounding factors. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing CABG surgery or PCI discharged between 1993 and 1995 uses the New York Department of Health databases and Cox proportional hazards analyses to estimate the mortality risk associated with CABG as compared with PCI for patients with renal insufficiency. Renal function was categorized as creatinine <2.5 mg/dL (N = 58,329), creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL (N = 840), and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) requiring dialysis (N = 407). RESULTS: Patients with either ESRD or serum creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL had more severe coronary artery disease and a greater frequency of comorbid conditions as compared with patients with creatinine <2.5 mg/dL. Creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL and ESRD were both associated with an increased mortality risk among all distributions of coronary artery disease anatomy. Among patients with ESRD, the risk ratio (RR) of mortality for patients undergoing CABG compared with PCI was 0.39 (95% CI, 0.22 to 0.67, P = 0.0006). Among patients with creatinine > or =2.5 mg/dL, CABG surgery did not convey a survival benefit over PCI (RR, 0.86, 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.33, P = 0.50). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates a survival benefit among patients with ESRD undergoing CABG surgery as compared with PCI, while controlling for severity of coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, and other comorbid conditions. These results suggest that management decisions among patients with coronary artery disease should be made in the context of not only location and severity of coronary artery lesions, but also on the presence and severity of renal dysfunction.

Hannan EL, Racz MJ, Arani DT, McCallister BD, Walford G, Ryan TJ. · Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, School of Public Health, State University of New York, University at Albany, New York 12144-3456, USA. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #10933348 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: We sought to compare patient outcomes for coronary stent placement and balloon angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Since 1994, the number of patients treated only with balloon angioplasty has decreased nationally, whereas the use of coronary stents as an alternative has grown tremendously. The objectives of this study were to compare short- and long-term survival and subsequent revascularization rates for patients undergoing single-vessel balloon angioplasty and coronary stent placement. METHODS: New York's Coronary Angioplasty Registry was used to identify New York patients undergoing either balloon angioplasty or stent placement between July 1, 1994, and December 31, 1996. Statistical models were used to compare risk-adjusted short- and long-term survival and subsequent coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). RESULTS: No significant differences were found in adjusted in-patient mortality, but patients who had balloon angioplasty were, on average, 1.36 times more likely to have died at any time during the two-year period after the index procedure (p = 0.003). The adjusted in-patient CABG rate was significantly higher for balloon angioplasty (2.72% vs. 1.66%, p<0.0001), and the adjusted two-year CABG rate was also significantly higher for balloon angioplasty (10.81% vs. 7.25%, p<0.001). The adjusted two-year rate for subsequent PCIs was also significantly higher for balloon angioplasty (19.6% vs. 14.3%, p<0.0001). Although measures were taken to eliminate or minimize the effect of selection bias, it should be noted that patients with stents were healthier at hospital admission than patients who had balloon angioplasty. CONCLUSIONS: Stent placement is associated with significantly lower risk-adjusted long-term mortality, CABG and subsequent PCI rates, as compared with balloon angioplasty.

Hannan EL, van Ryn M, Burke J, Stone D, Kumar D, Arani D, Pierce W, Rafii S, Sanborn TA, Sharma S, Slater J, DeBuono BA. · State University of New York, University at Albany, Rensselar, 12144-3456, USA. · Med Care. · Pubmed #10413394 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The study sought to determine if there were race/ethnicity or gender differences in access to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery among patients who have been designated as appropriate and as necessary for that surgery according to the RAND methodology. METHODS: RAND appropriateness and necessity criteria were used to identify a race/gender stratified sample of postangiography patients who would benefit from coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These patients were tracked for 3 months to determine if they had undergone coronary artery bypass graft surgery in New York State. Subjects were a total of 1,261 postangiography patients in eight New York hospitals in 1994 to 1996. Measures included percentages of patients for whom coronary artery bypass graft surgery was appropriate and necessary undergoing surgery by race/ethnicity and gender, as well as multivariate odds ratios for race/ethnicity and gender. RESULTS: After controlling for age, payer, number of vessels diseased, and presence of left main disease, African-American and Hispanic patients were found to be significantly less likely to undergo coronary artery bypass graft surgery than white non-Hispanic patients (respective odds ratios 0.64 and 0.60). When "necessity" was used as a criterion instead of "appropriateness," significant differences in access for African-American patients remained. The gatekeeper physician recommended surgery only 10% of the time that patients did not undergo "appropriate" coronary artery bypass graft surgery, and this percentage did not vary significantly by race/ethnicity or gender of the patient. CONCLUSIONS: Even after controlling for appropriateness and necessity for coronary artery bypass graft surgery in a prospective study, African-American patients had significant access problems in obtaining coronary artery bypass graft surgery. These problems appeared not to be related to patient refusals.

Hannan EL, Racz MJ, McCallister BD, Ryan TJ, Arani DT, Isom OW, Jones RH. · Department of Health Policy, Management, and Behavior, State University of New York, Rensselaer 12144-3456, USA. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #9935010 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to compare 3-year risk-adjusted survival in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery and percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. BACKGROUND: Coronary artery bypass graft surgery and angioplasty are two common treatments for coronary artery disease. For referral purposes, it is important to know the relative pattern of survival after hospital discharge for these procedures and to identify patient characteristics that are related to survival. METHODS: New York's CABG surgery and angioplasty registries were used to identify New York patients undergoing CABG surgery and angioplasty from January 1, 1993 to December 31, 1995. Mortality within 3 years of undergoing the procedure (adjusted for patient severity of illness) and subsequent revascularization within 3 years were captured. Three-year mortality rates were adjusted using proportional hazards methods to account for baseline differences in patients' severity of illness. RESULTS: Patients with one-vessel disease with the one vessel not involving the left anterior descending artery (LAD) or with less than 70% LAD stenosis had a statistically significantly longer adjusted 3-year survival with angioplasty (95.3%) than with CABG surgery (92.4%). Patients with proximal LAD stenosis of at least 70% had a statistically significantly longer adjusted 3-year survival with CABG surgery than with angioplasty regardless of the number of coronary vessels diseased. Also, patients with three-vessel disease had a statistically significantly longer adjusted 3-year survival with CABG surgery regardless of proximal LAD disease. Patients with other one-vessel or two-vessel disease had no treatment-related differences in survival. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment-related survival benefit at 3-years in patients with ischemic heart disease is predicted by the anatomic extent and specific site of the disease, as well as by the treatment chosen.