Coronary Artery Disease: Daemen J

Daemen J, Simoons ML, Wijns W, Bagust A, Bos G, Bowen JM, Braunwald E, Camenzind E, Chevaliers B, DiMario C, Fajadeto J, Gitt A, Guagliumi G, Hillege HL, James S, Jüni P, Kastrati A, Kloth S, Kristensen SD, Krucoff M, Legrand V, Pfisterer M, Rothman M, Serruys PW, Silber S, Steg PG, Tariah I, Wallentin L, Windecker SW, Aimonetti A, Allocco D, Berenger M, Boam A, Calle JP, Campo G, Carlier S, de Schepper J, Di Bisceglie G, Dobbels H, Farb A, Ghislain JC, Hellbardt S, ten Hoedt R, Isaia C, de Jong P, Lekehal M, LeNarz L, Mhullain FN, Nagai H, Patteet A, Paunovic D, Potgieter A, Purdy I, Raveau-Landon C, Ternstrom S, Van Wuytswinkel J, Waliszewski M, Anonymous00071. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · EuroIntervention. · Pubmed #19284063 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Onuma Y, Daemen J, Kukreja N, Serruys P. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Minerva Cardioangiol. · Pubmed #17912164 No free full text.

Abstract: The aim of this article is to review the treatment of patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease. Percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has been challenging coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) as the gold standard of care for patients with multi-vessel disease; however, the application of PCI to these patients has been mainly limited by restenosis. Up to the late 1990s, numerous large-scale, randomized trials addressed this issue comparing CABG to PCI with balloon angioplasty or bare-metal stents. These studies demonstrated similar rates of death and myocardial infarction in both groups, while the need for revascularization remained significantly lower in the CABG group. Drug-eluting stents (DES) have dramatically reduced restenosis and repeat revascularization rates. CABG has also progressed with improvements in perioperative management, a higher use of arterial grafting, and advanced techniques with the implementation of minimally invasive and off-pump surgery as options. Therefore, the results of previous trials in the pre-DES era can no longer be extrapolated into the ''real world''. As intermediate steps preceding a fully-fledged, randomized trial, several trials have compared PCI with DES and the historical control of CABG, but the results are still inconclusive. Several dedicated randomized trials are currently ongoing to compare PCI with DES and CABG using contemporary techniques. Until the results of these randomized trials are presented, the choice for each strategy should be based on the patients' individual risk and anatomy.

Daemen J, Serruys PW. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Circulation. · Pubmed #17709651 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Serruys PW, Daemen J. · Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · Circulation. · Pubmed #17344323 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Daemen J, Serruys PW. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Curr Opin Cardiol. · Pubmed #17053410 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The aim of this article is to review the current status of optimal revascularization strategies in patients presenting with multivessel coronary artery disease. RECENT FINDINGS: Coronary artery bypass surgery is the gold standard for patients with multivessel disease. Recent developments in the interventional field, like drug-eluting stents, which significantly reduced restenosis and the need for repeat revascularizations, have cut back one of the largest limitations of percutaneous coronary intervention. SUMMARY: There is currently little evidence to believe that in a general population, opting for either coronary artery bypass surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention would imply a better long-term survival. Coronary artery bypass surgery is still associated with higher rates of complete revascularization and a higher durability than percutaneous coronary intervention, resulting in lower rates of repeat revascularization. The current evidence, however, is based on sub-optimal inconclusive data from single center or multicenter registries. Until the results of several dedicated ongoing randomized trials are presented, the choice for a revascularization strategy should be made not only on the basis of feasibility but also by taking into account each patient's co-morbidities and risk factors. Careful monitoring of glycemic control and lipid concentrations and an optimal pharmacological treatment are at least as important in achieving an optimal outcome.

Aoki J, Ong A, Rodriguez-Granillo G, VanMieghem C, Daemen J, Sonnenschein K, McFadden E, Sianos G, van der Giessen W, de Feyter P, van Domburg R, Serruys P. · Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, 3015 GD, The Netherlands. · J Invasive Cardiol. · Pubmed #16003016 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Diabetes mellitus is a well-known risk factor for future adverse cardiac events after coronary intervention with conventional metal stents. In this study, the impact of sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) were evaluated in a consecutive group of diabetic patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary treatment and compared to a population treated with bare metal stents. METHODS AND RESULTS: From April 2002, a policy of routine SES implantation has been instituted in our hospital. During 1 year of enrollment, a total of 112 consecutive diabetic patients with de novo coronary lesions were electively treated with SES (SES group). A similar group for comparison comprised 118 consecutive patients treated with bare metal stents in the preceding period (the pre-SES group). After 1-year follow-up, the cumulative rate of major adverse cardiac events (death, myocardial infarction, and any repeat revascularization) was 17.3% in the SES group versus 30.2% in the pre-SES group (hazard ratio, 0.54 [95% confidence interval, 0.32-0.91]; p = 0.02), mainly due to a marked reduction in the need for repeat revascularization (10.2% versus 23.5%; hazard ratio, 0.40 [95% confidence interval, 0.21-0.78]; p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Routine utilization of SES for diabetic patients significantly reduces the rate of adverse cardiac events at 1 year compared to bare metal stents.

Daemen J, Lemos P, Aoki J, Arampatzis C, Hoye A, McFadden E, Serruys P. · Erasmus Medical Center, Catheterization Laboratory Thoraxcenter 416a, Dr. Molewaterplein, 40, 3015 GD, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · J Invasive Cardiol. · Pubmed #15596869 No free full text.

Abstract: From April 16, 2002 to October 16, 2002, 10 consecutive patients with coronary disease on chronic dialysis were treated with sirolimus-eluting stents. Diabetes was present in 30% and half of the patients had multivessel coronary disease. On average, patients had been on dialysis for 5 years prior to the procedure (range: 2-15 years). Five patients were on hemodialysis and 5 patients were on peritoneal dialysis. Overall, 18 lesions were treated with 1.9 +/- 1.1 sirolimus-eluting stents per patient. At a mean follow-up of 403 days, there were no cases of death, myocardial infarction, or target lesion revascularization.

Daemen J, van Twisk PH, Kukreja N, van Domburg RT, Boersma E, de Jaegere P, Serruys PW. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · EuroIntervention. · Pubmed #19284068 No free full text.

Abstract: AIMS: Sirolimus- and paclitaxel- eluting stents (SES and PES respectively) have been shown to produce a sustained reduction in restenosis and repeat revascularisations as compared to bare-metal stents (BMS) up to four years. There is still limited data about the long-term safety and efficacy of DES in high-risk subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 6,129 consecutive patients were treated during three sequential periods with BMS (n = 2,428; January, 2000 to April, 2002), SES (n = 866; April 2002 to February 2003) or PES (n = 2,835; February 2003 to December 2005). A stratified analysis (including age, gender, diabetes, clinical presentation, treated vessel, multivessel disease, AHA lesion class, bifurcation, in-stent restenosis, average stent diameter < or = 2.5 mm and total stented length < or = 30 mm) was performed to evaluate possible heterogeneities in treatment effect. At four years, all-cause mortality was identical between the drug-eluting stent (DES) and BMS cohorts (13.5% vs. 13.4%, respectively; Adjusted HR 1.10, 95% CI 0.90 - 1.34) without evidence of heterogeneity in the high-risk patient subsets. Both DES significantly reduced the risk for target vessel revascularisation (TVR) as compared to BMS (TVR: 11.9% vs. 15.7% respectively; Adjusted HR 0.69, 95% CI 0.58 - 0.82) along with a reduced risk for post-operative MI (adjusted HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.57 - 0.98), but counterbalanced by a non-significantly higher risk for stent thrombosis (3.1% vs. 1.6%; adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.82 - 1.95). DES failed to show superiority to BMS in patients with acute myocardial infarction (TVR 10.5% vs. 9.2% respectively; Adjusted HR 1.26, 95% CI 0.82 - 1.93). CONCLUSIONS: In a real world patient population, after four years, the overall use of DES was associated with similar all-cause mortality rates and a significantly reduced risk for post-operative MI and TVR as compared to BMS.

Kukreja N, Onuma Y, Garcia-Garcia HM, Daemen J, van Domburg R, Serruys PW, Anonymous00082. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #19121437 No free full text.

Abstract: Drug-eluting stents (DESs) have been shown to reduce the rate of repeat revascularization compared with bare-metal stents (BMSs) after multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention in carefully selected patients. However, the long-term safety and efficacy of DESs in patients with multivessel disease outside the setting of randomized trials was unknown. Therefore, all patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention with BMSs, sirolimus-eluting stents (SESs), or paclitaxel-eluting stents (PESs) from January 2000 to December 2005 were investigated. The primary end point was all-cause mortality. A total of 1,720 patients were recruited in 3 consecutive sequential groups of BMS (n=701; January 2000 to April 2002), SES (n=293; April 2002 to February 2003), and PES (n=726; February 2003 to December 2005). Overall median follow-up was 1,440 days. There was improved 3-year survival in the SES group (93.7%) compared with both the BMS (86.1%) and PES groups (87.3%), which remained significant after propensity score adjustment for differences in baseline and procedural characteristics (SES vs BMS, adjusted hazard ratio 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.30 to 0.94; SES vs PES, adjusted hazard ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.28 to 0.87). There was no difference in mortality between the PES and BMS groups. Both DES types significantly reduced the need for clinically driven target-vessel and target-lesion revascularization without an excess in myocardial infarction or stent thrombosis. In conclusion, both SESs and PESs significantly reduced the need for repeated revascularization in these patients with no excess in mortality. SESs might reduce mortality in patients undergoing multivessel percutaneous coronary intervention.

van Twisk PH, Daemen J, Kukreja N, van Domburg RT, Serruys PW. · Department of Cardiology, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · EuroIntervention. · Pubmed #19110803 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Recently, concerns were raised about the relative long-term safety and efficacy of drug-eluting stents (DES) in saphenous vein bypass grafts (SVG). Our objective was to assess the 4-year relative safety and efficacy of the unrestricted use of drug-eluting stents (DES) as compared to bare metal stents (BMS) in saphenous vein bypass grafts (SVG). METHODS: Between April 16, 2002 and December 2005 a total of 122 consecutive patients were treated with either sirolimus- or paclitaxel-eluting stents for saphenous vein graft disease. These patients were compared with 128 consecutive patients treated with BMS in the immediate preceding period (January 1, 2000 to April 2002). RESULTS: At 4-years the cumulative survival rate in the DES group was 77.5% versus 73.0% in the BMS group (adjusted HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.63-1.90, Logrank p=0.65). The cumulative survival free of major adverse cardiac events (MACE: death, myocardial infarction and target vessel revascularisation) was 61.5% vs. 46.8% in the DES and BMS groups respectively (adjusted HR 0.77, 95% CI; 0.51-1.16) due to a higher event free survival of clinically driven target vessel revascularisation in the DES group as compared to the BMS group (81.6% vs. 69.0%; adjusted HR 0.53; 95% CI 0.27-1.05). CONCLUSIONS: In the present study, the use of DES for SVG PCI was associated a similar safety profile and there was a trend towards lower rates of TVR and MACE at four years as compared to BMS.

Daemen J, Kuck KH, Macaya C, LeGrand V, Vrolix M, Carrie D, Sheiban I, Suttorp MJ, Vranckx P, Rademaker T, Goedhart D, Schuijer M, Wittebols K, Macours N, Stoll HP, Serruys PW, Anonymous00039. · Thoraxcenter, Erasmus Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands. · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #19055986 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to assess the 3-year outcome of coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG) and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) in patients who had multivessel coronary artery disease with and without diabetes mellitus. BACKGROUND: The optimal method of revascularization in diabetic patients remains in dispute. METHODS: The ARTS-II (Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study-Part II) trial is a single-arm study (n = 607) that included 159 diabetic patients treated with SES whose 3-year clinical outcome was compared with that of the historical diabetic and nondiabetic arms of the randomized ARTS-I trial (n = 1,205, including 96 diabetic patients in the CABG arm and 112 in the PCI arm). RESULTS: At 3 years, among nondiabetic patients, the incidence of the primary composite of death, CVA, myocardial infarction (MI), and repeat revascularization (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events [MACCE]), was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted odds ratio [OR]: 0.41; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.26 to 0.64) and similar to ARTS-I CABG. The ARTS-II patients were at significantly lower risk for death, CVA, and MI as compared with both the ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.55; 95% CI: 0.34 to 0.91) and ARTS-I CABG patients (adjusted OR: 0.56; 95% CI: 0.35 to 0.92). Among diabetic patients, the incidence of MACCE in ARTS-II was similar to that of both PCI and CABG in ARTS-I. Conversely, the incidence of death, CVA, and MI was significantly lower in ARTS-II than in ARTS-I PCI (adjusted OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.27 to 1.65) and was similar to that of ARTS-I CABG. CONCLUSIONS: At 3 years, PCI using SES for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease seems to be safer and more efficacious than PCI using bare-metal stents, irrespective of the diabetic status of the patient. Hence, PCI using SES appears to be a valuable alternative to CABG for both diabetic and nondiabetic patients.

Daemen J, Boersma E, Flather M, Booth J, Stables R, Rodriguez A, Rodriguez-Granillo G, Hueb WA, Lemos PA, Serruys PW. · Thoraxcenter, Ba-583, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, Netherlands. · Circulation. · Pubmed #18725490 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Randomized trials that studied clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with bare metal stenting versus coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) are underpowered to properly assess safety end points like death, stroke, and myocardial infarction. Pooling data from randomized controlled trials increases the statistical power and allows better assessment of the treatment effect in high-risk subgroups. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a pooled analysis of 3051 patients in 4 randomized trials evaluating the relative safety and efficacy of PCI with stenting and CABG at 5 years for the treatment of multivessel coronary artery disease. The primary end point was the composite end point of death, stroke, or myocardial infarction. The secondary end point was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular accidents, death, stroke, myocardial infarction, and repeat revascularization. We tested for heterogeneities in treatment effect in patient subgroups. At 5 years, the cumulative incidence of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke was similar in patients randomized to PCI with stenting versus CABG (16.7% versus 16.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 1.04, 95% confidence interval, 0.86 to 1.27; P=0.69). Repeat revascularization, however, occurred significantly more frequently after PCI than CABG (29.0% versus 7.9%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.23; 95% confidence interval, 0.18 to 0.29; P<0.001). Major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events were significantly higher in the PCI than the CABG group (39.2% versus 23.0%, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.53; 95% confidence interval, 0.45 to 0.61; P<0.001). No heterogeneity of treatment effect was found in the subgroups, including diabetic patients and those presenting with 3-vessel disease. CONCLUSIONS: In this pooled analysis of 4 randomized trials, PCI with stenting was associated with a long-term safety profile similar to that of CABG. However, as a result of persistently lower repeat revascularization rates in the CABG patients, overall major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular event rates were significantly lower in the CABG group at 5 years.

Khattab AA, Daemen J, Richardt G, Rioux P, Amann FW, Levy R, Horvath IG, Teles RC, Ordoubadi F, Pieters M, Wittebols K, Stoll HP, Serruys PW. · Herz-Kreislauf-Zentrum, Segeberger Kliniken GmbH, Bad Segeberg, Germany. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #18489932 No free full text.

Abstract: The differential safety and efficacy profiles of sirolimus-eluting stents when implanted in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease who have increased body mass indexes (BMIs) compared with those with normal BMIs are largely unknown. This study evaluated the impact of BMI on 1-year outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents as part of the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study Part II (ARTS II). From February to November 2003, 607 patients were included at 45 centers; 176 patients had normal BMIs (<25 kg/m(2)), 289 were overweight (> or =25 and < or =30 kg/m(2)), and 142 were obese (>30 kg/m(2)). At 30 days, the cumulative incidence of the primary combined end point of death, myocardial infarction, cerebrovascular accident, and repeat revascularization (major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events) was 3.4% in the group with normal BMIs, 3.1% in overweight patients, and 2.8% in obese patients (p = 0.76). At 1 year, the cumulative incidence of major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events was 10.8%, 11.8%, and 7.0% in the normal BMI, overweight, and obese groups, respectively (p = 0.31). In conclusion, BMI had no impact on 1-year clinical outcomes in patients with multivessel coronary artery disease treated with sirolimus-eluting stents in ARTS II.

Denollet J, Pedersen SS, Daemen J, de Jaegere P, Serruys PW, van Domburg RT. · CoRPS-Center of Research on Psychology in Somatic Diseases, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands. · J Intern Med. · Pubmed #18069998 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Emotional distress has been related to clinical events in patients with coronary artery disease, but the influence of positive affect (i.e. mood states such as activity, joy and cheerfulness) has received little attention. Therefore, we wanted to investigate the role of positive affect on clinical outcome after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with stent implantation in these patients. DESIGN: Prospective follow-up study. At baseline, patients from the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated At Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) registry completed measures of positive affect, depression and anxiety post-PCI. Patients with reduced positive affect scored 1 SD below the mean score. SETTING: University Hospital; Thoraxcenter of the Department of Cardiology. SUBJECTS: 874 patients (72% men; 62.2 +/- 10.9 years) from the RESEARCH registry. Main outcome measure. Death or myocardial infarction (MI) 2 years post-PCI. RESULTS: At follow-up, there were 52 clinical events (deaths n = 27, MIs n = 25). Reduced positive affect and depression/anxiety were associated with poor prognosis, but reduced positive affect was the only independent predictor of events. The incidence of death/MI in adequate versus reduced positive affect patients was 4% (29/663) vs. 11% (23/211); HR = 2.55 (95% CI 1.46-4.34, P = 0.001), adjusting for clinical variables. Reduced positive affect and diabetes were independent prognostic factors, and patients with one (HR = 2.84, 95% CI 1.58-5.10) or both (HR = 5.61, 95% CI 2.25-13.99) of these factors had a higher risk when compared with nondiabetic patients with adequate positive affect, P < or = 0.003. CONCLUSIONS: Reduced positive affect independently predicted death/MI following stent implantation, and improved risk stratification above and beyond diabetes.

Meliga E, García-García HM, Kukreja N, Daemen J, Tanimoto S, Ramcharitar S, van Mieghem CA, Sianos G, van der Ent M, van der Giessen WJ, de Feyter P, van Domburg R, Serruys PW. · Interventional Cardiology Department, Thoraxcenter, Erasmus University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. · Pubmed #17584913 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare the postprocedural and long-term clinical outcomes of two groups of patients, all presenting with chronic saphenous vein graft (SVG) occlusion, who underwent either SVG or native vessel reopening. BACKGROUND: Chronic total occlusions (CTO) treatment in patients who underwent previous surgical revascularization is a dilemma and the choice of performing native vessel or SVG recanalization is not always easy. METHODS: Between July 2002 and October 2004, a total of 260 patients were successfully treated for a CTO. Of them, we selected all patients (n = 24) who had previous bypass surgery with graft occlusion. Of this final group, 13 patients underwent a percutaneous graft recanalization while 11 underwent native vessel reopening. RESULTS: Primary end points were in-hospital and 3-year rates of death, myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, and target vessel revascularization. No events occurred in either group during the in-hospital period. Cumulative 3-year event-free survival in the native vessel and SVG group was 81.8% and 83.9% respectively (P = NS). One death and one TVR occurred in each group. CONCLUSION: In selected cases, SVG reopening instead of the native vessel is feasible. In such a high-risk population, drug-eluting stent implantation in both SVG and native CTO lesions is associated with good long-term outcomes.

Chieffo A, Park SJ, Valgimigli M, Kim YH, Daemen J, Sheiban I, Truffa A, Montorfano M, Airoldi F, Sangiorgi G, Carlino M, Michev I, Lee CW, Hong MK, Park SW, Moretti C, Bonizzoni E, Rogacka R, Serruys PW, Colombo A. · San Raffaele Scientific Institute and Emo Centro Cuore Columbus, Via Olgettina 60, 20132 Milan, Italy. · Circulation. · Pubmed #17576862 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The presence of a lumen narrowing at the ostium and the body of an unprotected left main coronary artery but does not require bifurcation treatment is a class I indication of surgical revascularization. METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 147 consecutive patients who had a stenosis in the ostium and/or the midshaft of an unprotected left main coronary artery (treatment of the bifurcation not required) and were electively treated with percutaneous coronary intervention and sirolimus-eluting stents (n=107) or paclitaxel-eluting stents (n=40) in 5 centres were included in this registry. In 72 patients (almost 50%), intravascular ultrasound guidance was performed. Procedural success was achieved in 99% of the patients; in 1 patient with stenosis in the left main coronary artery ostium, a >30% residual stenosis persisted at the end of the procedure, and the patient was referred for coronary artery bypass graft surgery. During hospitalization, no patients experienced a Q-wave myocardial infarction or died. One patient died 19 days after the procedure because of pulmonary infection. At long-term clinical follow-up (886+/-308 days), 5 patients had died; 7 patients had target vessel revascularization (5 repeat percutaneous coronary interventions and 2 coronary artery bypass graft surgeries), and of these only 1 patient had a target lesion revascularization. Angiographic follow-up was performed in 106 patients (72%) with a late loss of -0.01 mm. Restenosis in the left main trunk occurred only in 1 patient (0.9%). CONCLUSIONS: Percutaneous coronary intervention with sirolimus-eluting stents or paclitaxel-eluting stents implantation in nonbifurcation left main coronary artery lesions appears safe with a long-term major adverse clinical event rate of 7.4% and a restenosis rate of 0.9%.

van Domburg RT, Lemos PA, Takkenberg JJ, Liu TK, van Herwerden LA, Arampatzis CA, Smits PC, Daemen J, Venema AC, Serruys PW, Bogers AJ. · Thoraxcenter, room H 539, Erasmus Medical Center, Dr Molewaterplein 40, 3015 GD Rotterdam, The Netherlands. · Eur Heart J. · Pubmed #15637087 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIMS: Sirolimus-eluting stents (SES) have recently been shown to reduce restenosis in selected patients. The impact of this new stent on the use of coronary bypass graft (CABG) surgery or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in clinical practice is yet unknown. Therefore, we investigated the impact of SES on the clinical practice of CABG and PCI in a series of unselected consecutive patients. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between April and October 2002, a policy of SES implantation for all procedures has been instituted in our hospital. In total, 798 patients were referred to PCI and 275 to CABG (SES group). A control group was composed of all interventions (806 PCI and 314 CABG) performed during the preceding 6 months (pre-SES). The main outcome was the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 15 months. In the SES era, a significant shift was noted in the PCI group towards more multi-vessel stenting (28 vs. 24%; P<0.05), more bifurcation stenting (18 vs. 7%; P<0.0001), and the use of more stents (1.9 vs. 1.5; P<0.05). In the PCI elective patients, a shift was noted towards more three-vessel disease (pre-SES: 16% vs. SES: 23%; P=0.02). Furthermore, we observed a shift in the CABG group towards more impaired LV function (pre-SES: 34% vs. SES: 41%; P=0.02) and towards more three-vessel disease (pre-SES: 67% vs. SES: 75%; P=0.03). Overall, the cumulative MACE percentages at 1 year after coronary revascularization (PCI and CABG combined) decreased from 16.8 to 13.8% (P=0.03). The cumulative MACE percentages in the pure SES group and the pre-SES bare metal stent group at 12 months were 15.6 and 19.8%, respectively (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: The introduction of the SES has certainly had an impact on the treatment strategy of coronary artery disease (CAD). Increased use of these stents allows more complex coronary anatomy to be treated by PCI, and results in lower repeat revascularization rates.

Daemen J, Kukreja N, Serruys PW. · No affiliation provided · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #18550881 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.