Coronary Artery Disease: Cowley MJ

King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Hirshfeld JW, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM, Anonymous00143, Anonymous00144, Anonymous00145. · No affiliation provided · J Am Coll Cardiol. · Pubmed #17601554 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Anonymous00180, King SB, Aversano T, Ballard WL, Beekman RH, Cowley MJ, Ellis SG, Faxon DP, Hannan EL, Hirshfeld JW, Jacobs AK, Kellett MA, Kimmel SE, Landzberg JS, McKeever LS, Moscucci M, Pomerantz RM, Smith KM, Vetrovec GW, Creager MA, Holmes DR, Newby LK, Weitz HH, Merli G, Piña I, Rodgers GP, Tracy CM. · No affiliation provided · Circulation. · Pubmed #17592076 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Whitlow PL, Bass TA, Kipperman RM, Sharaf BL, Ho KK, Cutlip DE, Zhang Y, Kuntz RE, Williams DO, Lasorda DM, Moses JW, Cowley MJ, Eccleston DS, Horrigan MC, Bersin RM, Ramee SR, Feldman T. · Department of Cardiology, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Ohio 44195, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #11249886 No free full text.

Abstract: Rotational atherectomy is used to debulk calcified or complex coronary stenoses. Whether aggressive burr sizing with minimal balloon dilation (<1 atm) to limit deep wall arterial injury improves results is unknown. Patients being considered for elective rotational atherectomy were randomized to either an "aggressive" strategy (n = 249) (maximum burr/artery >0.70 alone, or with adjunctive balloon inflation < or = 1 atm), or a "routine" strategy (n = 248) (maximum burr/artery < or =0.70 and routine balloon inflation > or =4 atm). Patient age was 62 +/- 11 years. Fifty-nine percent routine and 60% aggressive strategy patients had class III to IV angina. Fifteen percent routine and 16% aggressive strategy patients had a restenotic lesion treated; lesion length was 13.6 versus 13.7 mm. Reference vessel diameter was 2.64 mm. Maximum burr size (1.8 vs 2.1 mm), burr/artery ratio (0.71 vs 0.82), and number of burrs used (1.9 vs 2.7) were greater for the aggressive strategy, p <0.0001. Final minimum lumen diameter and residual stenosis were 1.97 mm and 26% for the routine strategy versus 1.95 mm and 27% for the aggressive strategy. Clinical success was 93.5% for the routine strategy and 93.9% for the aggressive strategy. Creatine kinase-myocardial band (CK-MB) was >5 times normal in 7% of the routine versus 11% of the aggressive group. CK-MB elevation was associated with a decrease in rpm of >5,000 from baseline for a cumulative time >5 seconds, p = 0.002. At 6 months, 22% of the routine patients versus 31% of the aggressive strategy patients had target lesion revascularization. Angiographic follow-up (77%) showed minimum lumen diameter to be 1.26 mm in the routine group versus 1.16 mm in the aggressive group, and the loss index 0.54 versus 0.62. Dichotomous restenosis was 52% for the routine strategy versus 58% for the aggressive strategy. Multivariable analysis indicated that left anterior descending location (odds ratio 1.67, p = 0.02) and operator-reported excessive speed decrease >5,000 rpm (odds ratio 1.74, p = 0.01) were significantly associated with restenosis. Thus, the aggressive rotational atherectomy strategy offers no advantage over more routine burr sizing plus routine angioplasty. Operator technique reflected by an rpm decrease of >5,000 from baseline is associated with CK-MB elevation and restenosis.

Lipinski MJ, Martin RE, Cowley MJ, Goudreau E, Malloy WN, Johnson RE, Vetrovec GW. · Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Health Systems, Richmond 23298-0036, USA. · Clin Cardiol. · Pubmed #16477776 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: While morbidity and mortality were shown to be increased in the setting of an elevated white blood cell (WBC) count for patients with acute coronary syndrome, the impact of statin therapy on mortality for patients with an elevated WBC count is unknown in high-risk patients with coronary artery disease. HYPOTHESIS: The goal of this study was to determine whether statin therapy improved survival in patients with elevated WBC count undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with preexisting left ventricular (LV) dysfunction, a population at high risk for adverse outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated consecutive patient procedures performed at our institution from 1996 through 1999. Patients had a technically adequate angiographic left ventriculogram with a calculated ejection fraction (EF) < or = 50%. Patients with prior coronary artery bypass graft were excluded. Mortality data were retrieved using the U.S. Social Security Death Index. Follow-up ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 years. Means are provided with +/- standard deviation, and p values < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of the study population of 238 patients (average EF 39 +/- 9.8%, mean age 57.5 +/- 12 years, 68% men) 61% underwent PCI for a recent myocardial infarction, 68% received stents, and 65% were discharged on statins. Mean WBC count was 9,000 +/- 3,100 cells/mm3, with 28% of patients having a WBC > or = 10,000 cells/mm3. During follow-up, 27% of our population died. Patients with a WBC > or = 10,000 had worse survival than patients with WBC < 10,000 (1-year survival: 86 vs. 96%, p < 0.05; 3-year survival: 79 vs. 89%, p < 0.05). Survival was significantly improved in patients on statin therapy regardless of WBC count, but the greatest benefit tended to be in patients with WBC > or = 10,000 (WBC > or = 10,000; odds ratio [OR] 5.14, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.44-19.0, WBC < 10,000; OR 2.79,95% CI 1.13-7.1). Proportional hazard regression analysis demonstrated that both statin therapy and WBC count predicted mortality. CONCLUSION: Patients undergoing PCI with LV dysfunction discharged on statins had improved survival regardless of WBC count, with a trend for greater improvement in patients with elevated WBC counts. In addition, WBC count predicts mortality in this high-risk population with LV dysfunction undergoing PCI.

Lipinski MJ, Martin RE, Cowley MJ, Goudreau E, Malloy WN, Vetrovec GW. · Division of Cardiology, Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center, Richmond, Virginia. · Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. · Pubmed #16216018 No free full text.

Abstract: While earlier studies of balloon angioplasty (BA) in patients with left ventricular (LV) dysfunction suggested high late mortality, a study directly comparing coronary stenting and BA has not been performed. Since stenting provides a more durable revascularization, we sought to compare long-term survival in patients undergoing stenting vs BA in patients with decreased left ventricular ejection fractions (LVEF). We evaluated consecutive patient procedures performed in our institution from 1996 through 1999. Patients were considered part of the stent group if they received at least one stent. To be included, patients had to have a technically adequate angiographic LV gram with a calculated LVEF<or=50%. Patients with prior CABG were excluded. Mortality data was retrieved using the United States Social Security Death Index. Follow-up ranged from 3.5 to 6.5 years. Statistical analysis was performed and tests were significant with a P-value<0.05. A total of 238 patients fulfilled our criteria. Mean age was 57.5+/-12 years, mean LVEF was 39+/-10%, 67% were males, 71.5% received stents, 62% had a recent MI, and 19% died during follow-up. Overall 5-year survival was 84% for stenting and 77% for BA (P=NS). Patients with an LVEF<or=40% (n=110) had better survival at 5 years if they received a stent compared with BA alone (76% for stents vs. 53% for BA; P<0.05). Stenting was found to be significant predictor of late survival on Cox Hazard Regression analysis in patients with an LVEF<or=50% and LVEF<or=40%. This study demonstrates improved 5-year survival for patients undergoing stenting compared with balloon angioplasty in patients with LVEF<or=40%.

Thomas WJ, Cowley MJ, Vetrovec GW, Malloy W, Goudreau E. · Division of Cardiology, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia 23298, USA. · Am J Cardiol. · Pubmed #10867099 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Topaz O, Cowley MJ, Mohanty PK, Vetrovec GW. · Cardiac Catheterization Laboratories, McGuire VA Medical Center and Medical College of Virginia Hospitals, Medical College of Virginia, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond 23249, USA. · Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. · Pubmed #10348551 No free full text.

Abstract: Accelerated allograft vasculopathy significantly limits the survival of heart transplant recipients. The prevalence of allograft coronary artery disease is as high as 18% by 1 year and 50% by 5 years following heart transplant. Heart failure and sudden cardiac death are the two most common clinical presentations. In heart transplant recipients with severe, discrete focal allograft vascular disease, percutaneous balloon angioplasty is a viable palliative option. However, its application is limited by a significant restenosis rate and progression of allograft disease in nontreated segments. Diffuse disease with tapering of vessels may be approached by debulking devices. Emerging revascularization modalities for focal stenoses and some of the diffuse tapering vessels include coronary stents, rotational atherectomy, various wavelength lasers, and, to a lesser extent, directional atherectomy. Conceivably, stents will reduce restenosis rates related to focal, discrete plaques; yet it is unknown whether they will be efficacious in short- and long-term treatment of diffusely diseased segments affected by allograft disease. Accurate assessment of clinical outcomes and long-term evaluation is imperative prior to acceptance of these devices as fundamental interventional tools for treatment of allograft coronary artery disease.