Ulcerative Colitis: Veres G

Veres G, Baldassano RN, Mamula P. · First Department of Pediatrics, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. · Drugs. · Pubmed #17683171 No free full text.

Abstract: This review summarises the present knowledge of infliximab therapy in children with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) based on the available published literature. Infliximab, the chimeric monoclonal IgG(1) antibody to tumour necrosis factor-alpha, is indicated for medically refractory luminal and fistulising paediatric Crohn's disease. Recently, ulcerative colitis case series in children and adolescents suggested that infliximab might also be effective for treatment of ulcerative colitis resistant to standard medical therapy. Induction therapy with infliximab 5 mg/kg at weeks 0, 2 and 6 is routinely used. Since the majority of patients will relapse if not re-treated, a long-term approach with systematic re-treatment with 5 mg/kg every 8-12 weeks is recommended. Maintenance therapy every 8 weeks was superior to 12 weeks' administration in maintaining response and remission in the largest-to-date paediatric randomised trial. Concomitant immunosuppressive therapy reduces the risk of infliximab antibody formation and infusion reactions, and prolongs the duration of treatment success. Severe reactions may not be an absolute contraindication to future infliximab therapy. Premedication does not prevent the development of infusion reactions; however, it is indicated for prevention of subsequent infusion reactions. Adverse events and safety findings in children are comparable to those observed in adults. Latent tuberculosis needs to be screened for. Malignancy rates in paediatric patients treated with infliximab do not seem to be increased. However, newly reported cases of hepatosplenic T-cell lymphoma in young patients with IBD treated with infliximab and mercaptopurine therapy raise concern, and long-term follow-up studies are necessary to determine the true malignancy risk.

Papp M, Altorjay I, Lakos G, Tumpek J, Sipka S, Dinya T, Palatka K, Veres G, Udvardy M, Lakatos PL. · 2nd Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Hungary. · Clin Vaccine Immunol. · Pubmed #19193830 No free full text.

Abstract: No clear guidelines for indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) detection and interpretation of antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibodies (ANCA) have been proposed for inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). We evaluated the reliability of the combined use of ethanol- and formalin-fixed neutrophil substrates to identify atypical perinuclear ANCA (P-ANCA) by IIF under routine laboratory circumstances. A total of 204 IBD patients were assessed with four different fluorescent substrates in two distinct laboratories. Antibodies against myeloperoxidase, proteinase-3, and other specific granule proteins (elastase, lactoferrin, cathepsin G, lysozyme, and bactericidal permeability-increasing protein) were measured by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The combined application of ethanol- and formalin-fixed slides to detect atypical P-ANCA resulted in a lack of agreement between assays (kappa, < or =0.39) in the interassay study and moderate agreement in the interobserver study (kappa, 0.42). After atypical and typical P-ANCA patterns were combined, the consensus improved greatly. A total of 26.9% of patients were P-ANCA positive by at least two tests (44.3% of ulcerative colitis [UC] and 13.1% of Crohn's disease [CD] patients; P < 0.0001), while overall ANCA positivity was 22.5% to 34.8%. The combined application of ethanol-fixed and formaldehyde-fixed neutrophil substrates did not facilitate differentiation between P-ANCA and atypical P-ANCA, and the results were not consistent when substrates from different sources were used. Combining all P-ANCA ensures the highest sensitivity and specificity in differentiating UC from CD.

Lakatos PL, Altorjay I, Szamosi T, Palatka K, Vitalis Z, Tumpek J, Sipka S, Udvardy M, Dinya T, Lakatos L, Kovacs A, Molnar T, Tulassay Z, Miheller P, Barta Z, Stocker W, Papp J, Veres G, Papp M, Anonymous00019. · 1st Department of Medicine, Semmelweis University, Budapest, Hungary. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #18972554 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pancreatic autoantibodies (PAB) and goblet cell autoantibodies (GAB) are specific for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC), but the sensitivity alone is low. Conventional antibodies and carbohydrates (glycans) are associated with disease phenotype and may be of diagnostic importance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Our aim was to determine the accuracy of PAB and GAB autoantibodies as well as to study relevant phenotype-serotype associations. METHODS: A Hungarian study cohort of 1092 subjects, including 689 well-characterized, unrelated IBD patients (CD: 579, m/f ratio: 274/305, duration: 7.9 +/- 11.2 years; UC: 110, m/f ratio: 53/57, duration: 8.9 +/- 9.8 years), 139 celiac patients, 100 healthy, and 64 non-IBD gastrointestinal controls were investigated. Sera were assayed for PAB-GAB IgA/IgG, anti-Omp, anti-Saccharomyces cerevisiae antibodies (ASCA), and anti-glycans. TLR4 and NOD2/CARD15 was tested by polymerase chain reaction / restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Detailed clinical phenotypes were determined. RESULTS: The prevalence of PAB was significantly more frequent in CD (41.1%) versus UC (22.7%), celiac (22.3%), and controls (8% and 4.6%, P < 0.01 for each), while GAB detection was poor in all groups except UC (15.4%). In CD the combination of PAB and/or anti-glycans/ASCA increased the sensitivity to 72% and 59%, respectively, for isolated colonic disease. PAB was associated to gylcans (odds ratio [OR] 1.74,P = 0.002), ASCA IgG/IgA (OR 1.75, P = 0.002), Omp (OR 1.86, P = 0.001) as well as perforating, perianal disease, arthritis, ocular, and cutaneous manifestations (P = 0.002-0.032). In contrast, PAB and GAB antibodies were not associated with NOD2/CARD15 or TLR4, response to medical therapy, or need for surgery. No associations were found in UC. CONCLUSIONS: PAB autoantibodies in combination with ASCA or anti-glycan antibodies increase the sensitivity for detecting CD, especially isolated colonic CD. Antibody response to PAB was associated with complicated disease phenotype and extraintestinal manifestations in this Eastern European IBD cohort.

Papp M, Altorjay I, Norman GL, Shums Z, Palatka K, Vitalis Z, Foldi I, Lakos G, Tumpek J, Udvardy ML, Harsfalvi J, Fischer S, Lakatos L, Kovacs A, Bene L, Molnar T, Tulassay Z, Miheller P, Veres G, Papp J, Anonymous00415, Lakatos PL. · 2nd Department of Medicine, University of Debrecen, Debrecen, Hungary. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #17417801 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Antibodies directed against Saccharomyces cerevisiae (ASCA), perinuclear components of neutrophils (pANCA), and porin protein C of Escherichia coli (anti-OmpC) are reported to be associated with disease phenotype and may be of diagnostic importance in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Since limited data are available from Eastern Europe, we assessed the above antibodies in Hungarian IBD patients. METHODS: In all, 653 well-characterized, unrelated consecutive IBD patients (Crohn's disease [CD]: 558, m/f: 263/295, duration: 8.1 +/- 10.7 years; ulcerative colitis [UC]: 95, m/f: 44/51, duration: 8.9 +/- 9.8 years) and 100 healthy subjects were investigated. Sera were assayed for anti-Omp and ASCA by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ANCA by indirect immunofluorescence assay (IIF). TLR4 and NOD2/CARD15 variants were tested by polymerase chain reaction/restriction fragment length polymorphism (PCR-RFLP). Detailed clinical phenotypes were determined by reviewing the medical charts. RESULTS: Anti-Omp, ASCA, and atypical pANCA antibodies were present in 31.2%, 59.3%, and 13.8% of CD, 24.2%, 13.7%, and 48.5% of UC patients, and in 20%, 16%, and 5.6% of controls, respectively. ASCA and anti-Omp positivity were associated with increased risk for CD (odds ratio [OR](ASCA) = 7.65, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 4.37-13.4; OR(Omp) = 1.81, 95% CI: 1.08-3.05). In a logistic regression analysis, anti-Omp and ASCA were independently associated with ileal and noninflammatory disease, but not with a risk for surgery or response to steroids or infliximab. A serology dosage effect was also observed. ASCA and anti-Omp antibodies were associated with NOD2/CARD15, in addition to a gene dosage effect. No associations were found in UC. CONCLUSIONS: Serological markers were useful in the differentiation between CD and UC in an Eastern European IBD cohort. Reactivity to microbial components was associated with disease phenotype and NOD2/CARD15 genotype, further supporting the role of altered microbial sensing in the pathogenesis of CD.