| 1 |
Guideline Guidelines for treatment of ulcerative colitis in children. 2004
Tomomasa T, Kobayashi A, Ushijima K, Uchida K, Kagimoto S, Shimizu T, Tajiri H, Tahara T, Yoden A, Anonymous00348. · Department of Pediatrics, Gunma University Graduate School, Japan. · Pediatr Int. · Pubmed #15310325 No free full text.
Abstract: This paper introduces the guidelines for treatment of ulcerative colitis in children, created by the working group of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition (Chair: Yuichiro Yamashiro) and the Japanese Society for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) (Chair: Akio Kobayashi). The ideas of the working group, with regard to the fundamental differences in medical treatment between children and adults, included: (1) for children, intensive medical treatment including appropriate systemic management is important during the acute phase of illness. (2) Treatment with steroids, which can cause growth disturbances, should not be continued for long periods of time. (3) Pulsed steroid therapy, selective removal of blood cells, and intravenous infusion of cyclosporin should be included in the therapeutic option for severe and fluminant cases.
|
| 2 |
Article Efficacy and safety of azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine in Japanese pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis: a survey of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease. 2008
Tajiri H, Tomomasa T, Yoden A, Konno M, Sasaki M, Maisawa S, Sumazaki R, Shimizu T, Toyoda S, Etani Y, Nakacho M, Ushijima K, Kobayashi A, Anonymous00112. · Department of Pediatrics, Osaka General Medical Center, Osaka, Japan. · Digestion. · Pubmed #18577852 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Azathioprine (AZA) and 6-mercaptopurine (6-MP) have recently been used in Japanese pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis. The aims of this study were to evaluate both the therapeutic efficacy and safety of AZA/6-MP in this group of patients. METHODS: Fourteen members of the Japanese Society for Pediatric Inflammatory Bowel Disease reported 35 retrospective cases that received AZA/6-MP and were evaluated for adverse drug effects. In those who tolerated AZA/6-MP, disease activity and corticosteroid doses before and during the first 6 months of therapy were assessed. RESULTS: AZA or 6-MP was safely used in 21 of 35 patients (60%) without adverse drug effects. The disease activity began to decrease from the first month of therapy and the maximum effect was achieved after 3 months. The mean daily prednisolone dose was decreased from 26.9 to 11.6 mg and dose reduction was achieved in 58% of patients after 6 months of therapy. Fourteen of the 35 patients (40%) experienced adverse drug effects, including leukopenia (n = 11), aplastic anemia (n = 1), pancreatitis (n = 1) and liver dysfunction (n = 1). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of Japanese children with ulcerative colitis tolerated AZA/6-MP and experienced favorable effects. However, 40% experienced adverse drug effects, mainly myelosuppression.
|
| 3 |
Article Extracorporeal leukocyte removal therapy for patients with ulcerative colitis. 2007
Kumagai M, Yamato Y, Maeda K, Nakashima E, Ushijima K, Kimura A. · Department of Pediatrics and Child Health, Kurume University School of Medicine, Kurume, Japan. · Pediatr Int. · Pubmed #17587263 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present paper was to investigate efficacy of leukocytapheresis (LCAP) or granulocytapheresis (GCAP) in pediatric patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), including reduction of the total dose and side-effects of corticosteroids. METHODS: Courses of five Japanese adolescents with UC were analyzed. Four patients had recurrent UC with repeated remissions and exacerbations despite therapy including 5-aminosalicylic acid in combination with a corticosteroid. The other patient had a first attack. Effectiveness of adding LCAP or GCAP was assessed with regard to short-term changes in clinical activity, complications, and longer-term outcome. RESULTS: Clinical improvement was attained in three patients, while the other two did not improve and underwent colectomy. One of the two patients had moderately severe complications from LCAP and showed increased clinical activity during LCAP. The other, who began therapy with LCAP alone, had moderate improvement only after addition of a corticosteroid. CONCLUSION: Additional studies are needed to determine optimum timing of LCAP or GCAP and initiation of remission-maintenance therapy.
|
|
|