Ulcerative Colitis: Travis SP

 Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 21 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Colitis, Ulcerative," originating from Planet Earth —» Travis SP.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Guidelines for the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults. free! 2004

Carter MJ, Lobo AJ, Travis SP, Anonymous00282. · Division of Molecular and Genetic Medicine, Royal Hallamshire Hospital, Sheffield, UK. · Gut. · Pubmed #15306569 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

2 Editorial Editorial: mesalazine in ulcerative colitis--is it time to revise treatment guidelines in the UK? 2006

Travis SP. · No affiliation provided · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #16939422 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

3 Review Systematic review: does concurrent therapy with 5-ASA and immunomodulators in inflammatory bowel disease improve outcomes? 2009

Andrews JM, Travis SP, Gibson PR, Gasche C. · Departments of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Royal Adelaide Hospital and School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, SA, Australia. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #19077129 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: With greater use of immunomodulators in inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), it is uncertain whether concurrent therapy with both 5-aminosalicylic acid [5-ASA, mesalazine (mesalamine)] and an immunomodulator is necessary. AIM: To determine whether concurrent therapy with both 5-ASA and immunomodulator(s) improves outcomes in IBD. METHODS: Systematic review with search terms 'azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, thiopurine(s), 5 aminosalicylic acid, mesalazine, inflammatory bowel disease, ulcerative colitis, Crohn's disease, immunosuppressant(s), immunomodulator and methotrexate' in November 2007 to identify clinical trials on concurrent 5-ASA and immunomodulator therapy. RESULTS: Two small controlled studies were found. Neither showed a benefit on disease control beyond immunomodulator monotherapy. Potential pharmacological interactions exist between 5-ASA and thiopurines. Whilst circumstantial, epidemiological and laboratory evidence suggests that 5-ASA may assist colorectal cancer (CRC) chemoprevention, it may simply be via anti-inflammatory effects. With changes in practice, ethical issues and the long lead-time needed to demonstrate or disprove an effect, no clinical studies can/will directly answer this. The costs of avoiding one CRC in IBD may be as low as 153 times the annual cost of 5-ASA therapy. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear whether concurrent 5-ASA and immunomodulator therapy improves outcomes of disease control, drug toxicity or compliance. Concurrent therapy of 5-ASA and immunomodulators may decrease CRC risk at 'acceptable' cost.

4 Review Therapy of ulcerative colitis: state of the art. 2008

Brain O, Travis SP. · Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Curr Opin Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #18622161 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Advances in conventional therapy, novel targets and therapeutic goals are the highlights of treatment for ulcerative colitis in the last year. There have also been disappointments. This review summarizes the highs and lows, with an emphasis on strategy as opposed to seeking the newest treatment option. RECENT FINDINGS: In conventional therapy, once daily therapy for 5-aminosalicylic acid is generally sufficient. Furthermore, a new 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalamine MMX) has been released that effectively induces and maintains remission. There have been reappraisals of immunomodulators and further evaluation of (yes, now conventional!) infliximab for ulcerative colitis. Opportunistic infections, long-term outcomes and the burden of disease are being characterized. New therapeutic targets included an antibody against T cells (anti-CD3), but trials on visilizumab for acute severe colitis have been suspended. T-cell costimulation, phosphatidylcholine to promote barrier function, new anti-tumour necrosis factor agents, B-cell (anti-CD20) depletion and complementary therapies represent new therapeutic horizons. International agreement is needed on activity indices, definitions of remission, therapeutic goals (including mucosal healing) and outcomes that matter to patients, so that trials can be compared. SUMMARY: Advances will take time to alter mainstream practice, but 2007-2008 is the year of organized strategies, with European, American and British guidelines on ulcerative colitis published or in press. These should be the platform for better outcomes for patients.

5 Review Review article: what do patients with inflammatory bowel disease want for their clinical management? 2008

Westwood N, Travis SP. · National Association of Colitis and Crohn's Disease, UK. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #18307643 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The patient's perceptions of benefits and risks of treatment differ from those of physicians, yet this topic is rarely explored in ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease. AIM: To present a patient's perspective on care for their colitis, to consider how patients' views will influence preliminary proposals for standards of care, and to discuss the different priorities of patients and physicians. METHODS: Description of an individual patient's journey from diagnosis of ulcerative colitis to colectomy, compared with priorities proposed by a patient-based organization (National Association of Colitis and Crohn's disease). RESULTS: Awareness of colitis in primary care, prompt referral, timely investigation and specialist care if admitted to hospital are shared goals of patients and physicians. Patients are generally prepared to accept higher risks from medical treatment to avoid their undesirable outcomes (especially colectomy) than physicians will on their behalf. There has been little systematic study of this disparity in ulcerative colitis. Under-reporting the symptom burden, tolerance of treatment side effects, substantial lifestyle changes and willingness to explore any treatment options are characteristic coping strategies. Physicians should be alert to coping strategies, with a willingness to seek second opinions. CONCLUSION: Perceptions of risk and benefit differ between patients and physicians, and recognition of this difference is a starting point for difficult clinical decision-making.

6 Review Review article: induction therapy for patients with active ulcerative colitis. 2006

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital and Linacre College, Oxford, UK. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #16939424 No free full text.

Abstract: 5-aminosalicylic acid (mesalazine) is considered first-line therapy for active mild-moderate, left-sided or extensive ulcerative colitis. With modern delayed-release formulations, conventional doses are very well tolerated, and there is accumulating evidence that increasing the dose, to >4 g/day, leads to higher response rates and earlier symptom relief in patients with ulcerative colitis. There is evidence that combining oral and rectal (enema) formulations of 5-aminosalicylic acid leads to faster and higher remission rates. Despite the fact that clinical trials in ulcerative colitis have often used different endpoints, making it difficult to make objective comparisons, the evidence now strongly suggests that it is appropriate to start patients with mild or moderately active ulcerative colitis on doses of 5-aminosalicylic acid of at least 4 g/day. For those with extensive disease, adding rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid improves remission rates; the same seems likely to be true for limited disease, but robust evidence is lacking. Rectal 5-aminosalicylic acid may in fact be sufficient on its own for patients with active proctitis. Patients with mild-moderate ulcerative colitis who do not improve within 2 weeks of high-dose 5-aminosalicylic acid should have treatment augmented by oral steroids.

7 Review Management of acute severe colitis. 2005

Jakobovits SL, Travis SP. · Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Headington, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. · Br Med Bull. · Pubmed #16847166 No free full text.

Abstract: The management of acute severe ulcerative colitis depends on early recognition of the unwell patient with colitis, the prompt initiation of treatment and objective assessment of the likelihood of medical failure. This deters 'hopeful expectation' in an attempt to avoid surgery. Intravenous corticosteroids remain first-line therapy but are completely effective in only 40%, partially effective in 30% and around 30% come to colectomy. The decision to use ciclosporin or infliximab for those with a poor response to steroids should be made at an early stage, often 3 or 4 days after starting intensive therapy. Decision-making is becoming more difficult with agents such as visilizumab, tacrolimus and the technique of leucocytapheresis as further options. Nevertheless, intravenous corticosteroids and timely colectomy have reduced mortality from nearly 30% to < 1% in specialist centres. Ciclosporin has delayed the need for urgent colectomy in many patients, but long-term follow-up suggests the majority come to colectomy within 7 years. Long-term outcome with newer agents, including infliximab, is not yet known.

8 Review Review article: the management of mild to severe acute ulcerative colitis. free! 2004

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #15352901 links to  free full text

Abstract: The goals for the management of acute ulcerative colitis are the objective evaluation of disease activity, induction of remission, prevention of relapse and treatment of complications. Clinical practice should be guided by simple activity indices, as it is easy to underestimate severity. For the induction of remission, topical treatment with mesalazine (mesalamine) is appropriate initial therapy for distal disease but, if symptoms persist for over a fortnight, decisive treatment is usually appreciated by the patient. For mild to moderate disease, corticosteroids have been the mainstay in Europe, although high-dose aminosalicylates (such as Pentasa, 4 g orally daily and 1 g rectally) are an alternative for symptoms not interfering with daily activity. Novel therapeutic approaches in ulcerative colitis have lagged behind those used for Crohn's disease, but several (epidermal growth factor, RDP 58, basiliximab, leucocytapheresis) are on the horizon. Severe colitis, defined as a bloody stool frequency of more than six per day with any one of tachycardia (pulse > 90 beats/min), temperature (> 37.8 degrees C), anaemia (haemoglobin < 10.5 g/dL) or raised erythrocyte sedimentation rate (> 30 mm/h), is an indication for intensive intravenous treatment. National UK figures indicate that 30% of ulcerative colitis cases progress to colectomy, and objective criteria for predicting the need for colectomy have been validated. The timing of colectomy is the most important decision that a physician is called upon to make, in conjunction with the patient and surgical colleagues. For the maintenance of remission, aminosalicylates continue to be first-line therapy, although the choice of 5-aminosalicylate appears to be influenced as much by geography as by theoretical considerations. Steroids have no place in the maintenance of remission. Indications for azathioprine include patients after a severe relapse of ulcerative colitis, those with early relapse after steroids (dose of < 15 mg/day, or within 6 weeks of stopping) and those needing a second course of steroids within a year. Therapeutic decisions should have a strategy, aimed at navigating the patient around relapses and through to sustained remission. Good management depends on clinical skills, compassion and care of the individual, in addition to pharmaceuticals.

9 Review Thiopurine therapy: when to start and when to stop. 2003

McGovern DP, Travis SP. · Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics and Linacre College, University of Oxford, Oxford, UK. · Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #12610314 No free full text.

Abstract: The thiopurines azathioprine and 6-mercaptopurine are effective both for active disease and for maintaining remission in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis. This review describes criteria for starting thiopurines (two or more courses of steroids in a calendar year, relapse as prednisolone is reduced below 15 mg/day, within 6 weeks of stopping steroids) and the benefits of continuing treatment for up to 5 years. Challenging issues, such as thiopurine intolerance, relative merits of azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurine, monitoring therapy and thiopurines in pregnancy are addressed.

10 Review Therapeutic inhibitors of tumor necrosis factor in Crohn's disease. 2002

Ganesan S, Travis SP, Ahmad T, Jazrawi R. · Phase 1 Clinical Trials Unit, 119 Looseleigh Lane, Derriford, Plymouth, PL6 5HH, UK. · Curr Opin Investig Drugs. · Pubmed #12498004 No free full text.

Abstract: Therapeutic options for patients with refractory ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease have recently been augmented by the introduction of biological therapies. The pro-inflammatory cytokine, tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha is present in elevated concentrations in patients with inflammatory bowel disease and inhibitors of TNF alpha have proved effective as treatment. Strategies aimed at reducing TNF in patients with Crohn's disease, include the mouse/human chimeric monoclonal antibody, infliximab (Centocor Inc), the humanized monoclonal antibody, CDP-571 (Celltech Group plc), the human recombinant TNF receptor fusion protein, etanercept (Immunex Corp), and thalidomide. New approaches, including the use of soluble TNF receptors, appear promising. This article reviews the evidence of therapeutic inhibition of TNF.

11 Article Immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory disease in people with sarcoidosis: disease associations in a large UK database. 2009

Rajoriya N, Wotton CJ, Yeates DG, Travis SP, Goldacre MJ. · John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Postgrad Med J. · Pubmed #19520873 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Sarcoidosis is a multi-system disorder characterised by non-caseating granulomas. Coexistence of sarcoidosis with immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory diseases has been described in case series. However, the coexistence of two different diseases in individuals can occur by chance, even if each of the diseases is rare. AIM: To determine whether sarcoidosis necessitating hospital admission or day-case care coexists with a range of immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory diseases more commonly than expected by chance. DESIGN: Analysis of an epidemiological database of hospital admission and day-case statistics, spanning 30 years. RESULTS: 1510 patients with sarcoidosis were identified (mean age 44 years, median follow-up 19 years) who had been admitted to hospital or day-case care. Significant associations in the sarcoidosis cohort were identified with systemic lupus erythematosus (odds ratio (OR) 8.3; 95% CI 2.7 to 19.4), autoimmune chronic hepatitis (OR 6.7; 95% CI 1.8 to 17.1), multiple sclerosis (OR 3.3; 95% CI 1.7 to 5.6), coeliac disease (OR 3.1; 95% CI 1.01 to 7.3), thyrotoxicosis (OR 2.5; 95% CI 1.4 to 4.0), myxoedema (OR 2.2; 95% CI 1.2 to 3.7) and ulcerative colitis (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1.1 to 3.7). Weaker associations were found for diabetes mellitus with a first admission aged 30-49 years (OR 2.9; 95% CI 2.1 to 4.0) or age >50 (OR 1.7; 95% CI 1.2 to 2.3), but not for people age <30. No significant association with Crohn's disease (OR 1.52; 95% CI 0.61 to 3.14) or primary biliary cirrhosis (OR 3.75; 95% CI 0.77 to 11.0),was found. When all immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory diseases for which associations were sought were combined, the overall rate ratio associated with sarcoidosis was 2.2 (95% CI 1.9 to 2.6). CONCLUSION: This study adds epidemiological evidence to information from clinical reports that there is a connection between sarcoidosis and other immune-mediated and chronic inflammatory diseases.

12 Article Long-term outcome after admission for acute severe ulcerative colitis in Oxford: the 1992-1993 cohort. 2009

Bojic D, Radojicic Z, Nedeljkovic-Protic M, Al-Ali M, Jewell DP, Travis SP. · Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #19145641 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: To determine the long-term outcome of patients admitted with acute severe colitis (ASC) who avoided colectomy on the index admission, a retrospective cohort study was performed. METHODS: Patients admitted for intensive treatment of ASC in 1992-1993 previously described for a predictive index of short-term outcome in severe ulcerative colitis (UC) were followed for a median 122 months (range 3-144). Complete responders (CR) to intensive therapy had <3 nonbloody stools/day on day 7 of the index admission; incomplete responders (IR) were all others who avoided colectomy on that admission. Main outcome measures were colectomy-free survival, time to colectomy, and duration of steroid-free remission. RESULTS: In all, 6/19 CR (32%) came to colectomy compared to 10/13 IR (P = 0.016; relative risk 3.33, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.12-9.9). The median +/- interquartile range time to colectomy was 28 +/- 47 months (range 6-99) for CR who came to colectomy versus 7.5 +/- 32 (3-72) months for IR (P = 0.118). Among the IR, 7/13 came to colectomy within 12 months, and all within 6 years from the index admission. The longest period of steroid-free remission was 42 +/- 48 (0-120) months for CR, but 9 +/- 20 (1-35) months for IR (P = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: One week after admission with ASC in the prebiologic era, IRs had a 50% chance of colectomy within a year and 70% within 5 years, despite cyclosporin and azathioprine where appropriate. The maximum duration of remission in CRs was almost 5 times longer than IRs. It is unknown whether biologics change the long-term outcome.

13 Article The European consensus on ulcerative colitis: new horizons? 2008

Stange EF, Travis SP. · Robert Bosch Krankenhaus, Stuttgart, Germany. · Gut. · Pubmed #18448568 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

14 Article Outcome measurement in clinical trials for Ulcerative Colitis: towards standardisation. free! 2007

Cooney RM, Warren BF, Altman DG, Abreu MT, Travis SP. · Gastroenterology Unit, John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, OX3 9DU, UK. · Trials. · Pubmed #17592647 links to  free full text

Abstract: Clinical trials on novel drug therapies require clear criteria for patient selection and agreed definitions of disease remission. This principle has been successfully applied in the field of rheumatology where agreed disease scoring systems have allowed multi-centre collaborations and facilitated audit across treatment centres. Unfortunately in ulcerative colitis this consensus is lacking. Thirteen scoring systems have been developed but none have been properly validated. Most trials choose different endpoints and activity indices, making comparison of results from different trials extremely difficult. International consensus on endoscopic, clinical and histological scoring systems is essential as these are the key components used to determine entry criteria and outcome measurements in clinical trials on ulcerative colitis. With multiple new therapies under development, there is a pressing need for consensus to be reached.

15 Article Infliximab for the treatment of ulcerative colitis: outcomes in Oxford from 2000 to 2006. 2007

Jakobovits SL, Jewell DP, Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford, UK. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #17439506 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Infliximab has been shown to be of benefit in the treatment of ulcerative colitis but long-term colectomy rates remain unknown. AIMS: To review the rate of colectomy after infliximab for ulcerative colitis and to identify factors that might predict the need for colectomy. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients with active ulcerative colitis treated with infliximab between 2000 and 2006. The primary outcome was colectomy-free survival. Disease and treatment characteristics and complications were documented. RESULTS: Thirty patients were treated with infliximab for refractory ulcerative colitis. Sixteen (53%) came to colectomy a median of 140 days after their first infusion (range 4-607). There was no difference in colectomy between those receiving infliximab for acute severe ulcerative colitis failing intravenous steroids (8/14) and out-patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis (8/16). Only 17% (5/30) achieved a steroid-free remission after a median follow-up of 13 months (range 2-72). Univariate analysis showed that a younger age at diagnosis of colitis was significantly associated with an increased rate of colectomy (27.5 years vs. 38.7 years, P = 0.016). CONCLUSION: Over half the patients studied came to colectomy. Of those avoiding colectomy, only five (17%) sustained a steroid-free remission.

16 Article TUCAN (CARD8) genetic variants and inflammatory bowel disease. 2006

McGovern DP, Butler H, Ahmad T, Paolucci M, van Heel DA, Negoro K, Hysi P, Ragoussis J, Travis SP, Cardon LR, Jewell DP. · Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, University of Oxford, Drive, Headington, Oxford OX3 7BN, England, UK. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #17030188 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: The identification of the association between Crohn's disease (CD) and NOD2 (CARD15) confirmed both the heritability of CD and highlighted the role of the nuclear factor kappaB (NFkappaB) pathway in disease pathogenesis. Other susceptibility loci exist. TUCAN (CARD8) is located beneath a CD peak of linkage on chromosome 19q. TUCAN is expressed in the gut and is a negative regulator of NFkappaB, making it an excellent candidate gene for gastrointestinal inflammation. METHODS: Ten single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) across TUCAN were genotyped in 365 controls, 372 patients with CD, and 373 patients with ulcerative colitis. A diagnostic panel for CD was constructed using smoking status and TUCAN, NOD2, IBD5, NOD1, and TNFSF15 data. RESULTS: We demonstrate significant association between a TUCAN SNP and CD (OR 1.35, P = .0083). The association was more pronounced with disease affecting sites other than the colon (odds ratio, 1.52) and NOD2-negative CD (odds ratio, 1.50). Combination of these data with smoking and NOD2, IBD5, NOD1, and TNFSF15 status demonstrated very strong associations with CD and high sensitivities (96.3%), specificities (99.4%), and likelihood ratios (12.8) for CD, although further work will be needed before this model can be translated into direct clinical utility. CONCLUSIONS: We have shown an association between a likely functional polymorphism in TUCAN and CD. The combination of these data in a genetic panel suggests that clinicians may soon be able to translate genetic advances into direct benefits for patients.

17 Article New thinking: theory vs practice. A case study illustrating evidence-based therapeutic decision making. 2006

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital and Linacre College, Oxford, UK. · Colorectal Dis. · Pubmed #16594961 No free full text.

Abstract: Evidence-based medicine (EBM) plays a key role for decision making in clinical practice. Clinicians are encouraged to adhere to treatment guidelines based on high quality clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses, that are the focus of the Cochrane Collaboration. EBM is not, however, a panacea for medical decision making. The results of randomized clinical trials apply to populations of patients, and the challenge is to translate the results to individuals. Individual patients require different thought processes because presentation and response vary, and external factors (e.g. patient preference) influence the choice of treatment. The application of EBM demands clinical judgement. The case of a 28 year old scientist who presented with typical features of moderate ulcerative colitis, illustrates the dilemma. At each stage of his illness the treatment options based on EBM were discussed, including high dose 5-aminosalicyclic acid with or without topical therapy, corticosteroids, infliximab, immunomodulation, complementary therapy and surgery. Ultimately, therapeutic decisions depended on the patient's circumstances, preferences and response. Decisions should avoid circular motion caused by the illusion of progress and always consider the direction of travel.

18 Article Dose escalation of 5ASA: does it work? 2005

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital and Linacre College, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7LJ, UK. · Dig Liver Dis. · Pubmed #15733517 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

19 Article Oral methotrexate in ulcerative colitis. free! 2005

Cummings JR, Herrlinger KR, Travis SP, Gorard DA, McIntyre AS, Jewell DP. · Gastroenterology Unit, University of Oxford, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #15709988 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We performed an audit of methotrexate for ulcerative colitis, because efficacy is unclear. Aim : To investigate the role of methotrexate in the management of ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Patients with ulcerative colitis treated with oral methotrexate at the inflammatory bowel disease clinics of Oxford and Wycombe General Hospital, UK, were evaluated. Efficacy was defined by remission (complete steroid withdrawal for >3 months) and response (good, partial or nil, proportionate reduction of steroids). RESULTS: There were 50 patients (42 ulcerative colitis alone; eight had rheumatoid arthritis associated with ulcerative colitis and were analysed separately). Indications for methotrexate in ulcerative colitis alone were azathioprine intolerance (31 of 42) and lack of benefit from azathioprine (11 of 42). The mean dose of methotrexate in ulcerative colitis alone was 19.9 mg/week for a median of 30 weeks (range: 7-395). Remission occurred in 42%. The response was good in 54% and partial in 18%. Side-effects occurred in 23%; 10% stopped treatment because of side-effects. Of those treated with methotrexate because of treatment failure with azathioprine, three of 11 achieved remission, but four came to colectomy within 90 days of starting methotrexate. The colitis remained in remission in seven of eight of those with RA treated with methotrexate and ulcerative colitis (mean dose 15.0 mg/week). CONCLUSION: Oral methotrexate (approximately 20 mg/week) is well-tolerated and moderately effective in steroid-dependent or steroid-refractory patients with ulcerative colitis.

20 Article Predicting outcome in severe ulcerative colitis. 2004

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital and Linacre College, Old Road, Headington, Oxford OX3 7L1, UK. · Dig Liver Dis. · Pubmed #15285522 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

21 Article Which 5-ASA? free! 2002

Travis SP. · John Radcliffe Hospital, Oxford OX3 9DU, UK. · Gut. · Pubmed #12235078 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.