Ulcerative Colitis: Provenzale D

Muir AJ, Edwards LJ, Sanders LL, Bollinger RR, Koruda MJ, Bachwich DR, Provenzale D. · Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina 27710, USA. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11374686 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The ileal pouch anal anastomosis is a safe and effective procedure but is also associated with pouchitis, small bowel obstruction, and incontinence. We prospectively evaluated the health-related quality of life using generic and disease-specific measures in a cohort of patients with ulcerative colitis undergoing ileal pouch anal anastomosis. METHODS: Health-related quality of life measures included the Time Trade-off, Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns, and the Short-Form 36. Assessments occurred preoperatively and 1, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Time Trade-off scores had significantly improved at the 1-month postoperative assessment and approached perfect health at the 12-month postoperative assessment. The Rating Form of IBD Patient Concerns revealed a significant reduction in patient concerns at 1 month, and this difference persisted at 6 and 12 months. Seven of the eight subscales of the Short-Form 36 revealed improved health-related quality of life postoperatively. CONCLUSIONS: Health-related quality of life improved after ileal pouch anal anastomosis when assessed with both generic and disease-specific measures. Improvements were observed as early as 1 month postoperatively. These results may guide patients and physicians as they consider and prepare for the impact of ileal pouch anal anastomosis.

Provenzale D, Onken J. · Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, North Carolina 27710, USA. · J Clin Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11205664 No free full text.

Abstract: This review article on the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis provides an overview of the criteria for evaluating screening and surveillance programs and applies the criteria to the available evidence to determine the effectiveness of the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis. We examine the clinical outcomes associated with surveillance, the additional clinical time required to confirm the diagnosis of dysplasia and cancer, compliance with surveillance and follow-up, and the effectiveness of the individual components of a surveillance program, including colonoscopy and pathologist's interpretation. The disability associated with colectomy is considered, as are the cost and acceptability of surveillance programs. Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis are at risk for developing colorectal cancer. Recommended surveillance colonoscopy should be supported. New endoscopic and histopathologic techniques to improve the identification of high-risk patients may enhance the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surveillance practices.