Ulcerative Colitis: Onken J

Sands BE, Cuffari C, Katz J, Kugathasan S, Onken J, Vitek C, Orenstein W. · Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #15472534 No free full text.

Abstract: During the past 2 decades, medical therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) has grown to incorporate a variety of immunesuppressing agents. At the same time, basic insights into the aberrant mucosal immune response underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded dramatically. The interplay of host susceptibility to infection and the safety and efficacy of immunization for vaccine-preventable diseases has been explored in other immune-mediated disease states but only rarely in IBD. The purpose of this review is to formulate best-practice recommendations for immunization in children and adults with IBD by considering the effects of the IBD disease state and its treatments on both the safety and efficacy of immunization. To do so, we first considered the routine recommendations for immunization of children, adults and distinct populations at increased risk for vaccine-preventable disease. Because it was rarely possible to examine direct data on safety and efficacy of immunization in IBD populations, we relied to a large extent upon extrapolation from similar populations and from knowledge of basic mechanisms. The literature suggests that efficacy of immunization may be diminished in some patients whose immune status is compromised by immune suppression. However, except for live agent vaccines, most immunizations may be safely administered to patients with IBD even when immune compromised. Conversely, protection against vaccine-preventable illness may be of even greater benefit to those at risk for morbid or lethal complications of infections because of an immune compromised state. We conclude that for most patients with IBD, recommendations for immunization do not deviate from recommended schedules for the general population.

Arseneau KO, Sultan S, Provenzale DT, Onken J, Bickston SJ, Foley E, Connors AF, Cominelli F. · Division of Gastroenterology & Hepatology, University of Virginia Health System, Charlottesville, Virginia, USA. · Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #16829206 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis face a difficult treatment decision between colectomy and therapy with infliximab or cyclosporine. The aim of this study was to understand how individual patient preferences for the various treatment outcomes influence the optimal treatment decision for a given patient. METHODS: A Markov model was used to simulate treatment with total colectomy with an ileo pouch-anal anastomosis (TC/IPAA), cyclosporine (CSA), infliximab (INFLX), and infliximab followed by cyclosporine for treatment failures (INFLX-->CSA). Utility weights for treatment outcomes were elicited from 48 patients using both time trade-off and visual rating scale methods. Preference sets were applied to the model to identify the therapy that maximized quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) for each patient. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess model robustness. RESULTS: Optimal treatment was highly variable among patients (INFLX-->CSA = 42%, 20/48; TC/IPAA = 37%, 18/48; CSA = 21%, 10/48; INFLX = 0%, 0/48). However, when average preference weights from our sample were applied to the model, medical treatments were superior to TC (CSA = .26 QALYs gained vs TC/IPAA; INFLX-->CSA = .25 QALYs gained vs TC/IPAA). CONCLUSIONS: Patient preferences have a clear impact on the optimal treatment for steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. Although averaged preferences support the use of medical interventions, a third of individual patients may benefit most from proceeding directly to colectomy. Failure to fully assess individual preferences may result in suboptimal treatment for these patients.

Provenzale D, Onken J. · Division of Gastroenterology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham VA Medical Center, North Carolina 27710, USA. · J Clin Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11205664 No free full text.

Abstract: This review article on the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis provides an overview of the criteria for evaluating screening and surveillance programs and applies the criteria to the available evidence to determine the effectiveness of the surveillance of patients with ulcerative colitis. We examine the clinical outcomes associated with surveillance, the additional clinical time required to confirm the diagnosis of dysplasia and cancer, compliance with surveillance and follow-up, and the effectiveness of the individual components of a surveillance program, including colonoscopy and pathologist's interpretation. The disability associated with colectomy is considered, as are the cost and acceptability of surveillance programs. Patients with long-standing ulcerative colitis are at risk for developing colorectal cancer. Recommended surveillance colonoscopy should be supported. New endoscopic and histopathologic techniques to improve the identification of high-risk patients may enhance the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of surveillance practices.