| 26 |
Article The C/C(-13910) and G/G(-22018) genotypes for adult-type hypolactasia are not associated with inflammatory bowel disease. 2003
Büning C, Ockenga J, Krüger S, Jurga J, Baier P, Dignass A, Vogel A, Strassburg C, Weltrich R, Genschel J, Lochs H, Schmidt H. · Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, Charité, Humboldt University, Berlin, Germany. · Scand J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #12795467 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lactose intolerance with adult-onset is due to the inadequate enzymatic activity of lactasephlorizin hydrolase (LPH). It is frequently seen in patients with Crohn disease, but the mechanism remains to be elucidated. Two DNA genotypes, C/C(-13910) and G/G(-22018), located upstream from the LCT locus, the gene encoding for LPH, were recently identified as representing genetic markers for lactose intolerance. We utilized these two DNA genotypes to study their role in inflammatory bowel disease. METHODS: We investigated the prevalence of these two DNA variants using specific restriction enzyme digest assays in 166 patients with Crohn disease, in 120 healthy first-degree relatives of Crohn disease patients, in 63 patients with ulcerative colitis and in 187 healthy individuals. RESULTS: The analysis revealed a frequency of 21.4% of the 2 genotypes for adult-type hypolactasia in our studied German cohort of healthy individuals, which is higher than previously reported (15%) based on the hydrogen (H2) breath test. This might indicate a higher sensitivity of genotyping, but it has to be confirmed in larger cohorts. No significant difference was detectable in the frequency of the C/C(-13910) and G/G(-22018) genotypes in patients with Crohn disease (C/C(-13910): 21.7%; G/G(-22018): 22.3%) compared to first-degree relatives (C/C(-13910): 21.7%; G/G(-22018): 20.8%), patients with ulcerative colitis (C/C(-13910): 20.3%; G/G(-22018): 20.3%) and healthy individuals (C/C(-13910): 21.4%; G/G(-22018): 21.4%). CONCLUSION: The C/C(-13910) and G/G(-22018) genotype of adult-type hypolactasia is not associated with susceptibility to the pathogenesis of Crohn disease and ulcerative colitis.
|
| 27 |
Article Non-invasive evaluation of activity in inflammatory bowel disease by power Doppler sonography. 2002
Heyne R, Rickes S, Bock P, Schreiber S, Wermke W, Lochs H. · Dept. of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Endocrinology, University Hospital Charité (Campus Mitte), 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Z Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #11901450 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: To study the vascularization in the diseased bowel wall by power Doppler sonography in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The diseased bowel wall was investigated in 99 patients with inflammatory bowel disease (60 patients with Crohn's disease and 39 patients with ulcerative colitis) either with active disease or in remission by B-mode and power Doppler sonography. Disease activity was determined by clinical indices. Twenty healthy age and sex matched individuals served as controls. RESULTS: Bowel wall was thickened in active Crohn's disease (mean 7 mm, range 4-14) and ulcerative colitis (mean 5 mm, range 2-15) as compared to healthy controls (mean 2 mm, range 1-3), p < 0.001. In contrast to healthy controls blood vessels were detected in the bowel wall in 100 % of patients with active Crohn's disease and 91 % with active ulcerative colitis. Vascularization was significant decreased in patients with quiescent versus active disease in ulcerative colitis (p < 0.05), while in Crohn's disease there was no significance between active and remission phase. CONCLUSIONS: Thickened and hypervascularized bowel wall are characteristic findings in inflammatory bowel disease. A combination of B-mode and power Doppler sonography offers an additional noninvasive procedure for the determination of activity in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
|
| 28 |
Article Higher expression of glucocorticoid receptor in peripheral mononuclear cells in inflammatory bowel disease. 2000
Schottelius A, Wedel S, Weltrich R, Rohde W, Buttgereit F, Schreiber S, Lochs H. · IV and III Medical Department of Medicine and Institute for Experimental Endocrinology, Charité University Medical Center, Berlin, Germany. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #10950048 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Glucocorticoids are widely used in the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Up- and down-regulated expression of glucocorticoid receptors (GR) has been reported for different chronic inflammatory diseases. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression of GR and their apparent dissociation constant (Kd) in patients with IBD. METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with IBD (22 with ulcerative colitis, 17 with Crohn's disease) and 35 normal controls were studied. Twenty-five patients did not receive steroids, 14 patients were treated with steroids. Peripheral blood mononuclear cells from patients and controls were isolated using the Ficoll-Hypaque gradient and a whole cell [3H]-dexamethasone binding assay and Scatchard plot analysis were performed to assess GR number and the apparent dissociation constant. Results were expressed as mean +/- standard deviation. RESULTS: Normal controls showed an expression of 3,969 +/- 1,555 GR per cell with an apparent dissociation constant of 6.16 +/- 3.8 nmol/L. IBD patients without steroids had a significant increase both in the expression of GR per cell (6,401 +/- 2,344; p < 0.0001; Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test) and in the apparent dissociation constant (11.02 +/- 7.57 nmol/L; p = 0.006). Expression of GR in IBD patients was suppressed to normal levels under steroid treatment (4,594 +/- 2,237; p = 0.024), but Kd remained elevated (13.56 +/- 9.05 nmol/L). Plasma cortisol levels were not different between IBD patients and the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Our data show a systemic increase in GR expression and a decrease in the affinity to the GR in IBD, in contrast to other inflammatory diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis and asthma. These changes point towards a systemic character of IBD, which might be considered in a decision between topical and systemic treatment.
|
Prior |
|
|