Ulcerative Colitis: Katz J

Sands BE, Cuffari C, Katz J, Kugathasan S, Onken J, Vitek C, Orenstein W. · Gastrointestinal Unit, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #15472534 No free full text.

Abstract: During the past 2 decades, medical therapy for Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) has grown to incorporate a variety of immunesuppressing agents. At the same time, basic insights into the aberrant mucosal immune response underlying inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) have expanded dramatically. The interplay of host susceptibility to infection and the safety and efficacy of immunization for vaccine-preventable diseases has been explored in other immune-mediated disease states but only rarely in IBD. The purpose of this review is to formulate best-practice recommendations for immunization in children and adults with IBD by considering the effects of the IBD disease state and its treatments on both the safety and efficacy of immunization. To do so, we first considered the routine recommendations for immunization of children, adults and distinct populations at increased risk for vaccine-preventable disease. Because it was rarely possible to examine direct data on safety and efficacy of immunization in IBD populations, we relied to a large extent upon extrapolation from similar populations and from knowledge of basic mechanisms. The literature suggests that efficacy of immunization may be diminished in some patients whose immune status is compromised by immune suppression. However, except for live agent vaccines, most immunizations may be safely administered to patients with IBD even when immune compromised. Conversely, protection against vaccine-preventable illness may be of even greater benefit to those at risk for morbid or lethal complications of infections because of an immune compromised state. We conclude that for most patients with IBD, recommendations for immunization do not deviate from recommended schedules for the general population.

Seidner DL, Lashner BA, Brzezinski A, Banks PL, Goldblum J, Fiocchi C, Katz J, Lichtenstein GR, Anton PA, Kam LY, Garleb KA, Demichele SJ. · Department of Gastroenterology\A30, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, 9500 Euclid Avenue, Cleveland, OH 44195, USA. · Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #15822041 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: N-3 fatty acids from fish oil, antioxidants, and short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) produced during the fermentation of soluble fiber may attenuate inflammation associated with ulcerative colitis (UC). We assessed the efficacy of a nutritionally balanced oral supplement enriched with fish oil, fructooligosaccharides, gum arabic, vitamin E, vitamin C, and selenium on disease activity and medication use in adults with mild to moderate UC. METHODS: A total of 121 patients with UC and a disease activity index (DAI) from 3-9 on a 12-point scale were block randomized for extent of disease and smoking status. In addition to their usual diet, patients consumed 18 oz of the oral supplement or a carbohydrate-based placebo formula each day for 6 months. Clinical and histologic responses were assessed at 3 and 6 months or at the final visit. A change in average prednisone use between groups was tested by using a linear mixed-effects model. RESULTS: Eighty-six patients completed the study. Baseline characteristics were not different between groups except for a higher total DAI score in the oral supplement group (7.3 +/- 1.3; n = 36) compared with the placebo group (6.2 +/- 2.0; n = 50) ( P < .05). Both groups showed significant and similar degree of improvement at 6 months in DAI (-2.5 for oral supplement and -2.8 for placebo) and histologic index (-1.9 for oral supplement vs. -2.0 for placebo). Both intent-to-treat and completed patients given oral supplement had a significantly greater rate of decrease in the dose of prednisone required to control clinical symptoms over 6 months as compared with the placebo group ( P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: The improvement in clinical response combined with a decreased requirement for corticosteroids suggest that this enriched oral supplement can be a useful adjuvant therapy in patients with UC.

Sandborn WJ, Sands BE, Wolf DC, Valentine JF, Safdi M, Katz S, Isaacs KL, Wruble LD, Katz J, Present DH, Loftus EV, Graeme-Cook F, Odenheimer DJ, Hanauer SB. · Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #12786629 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Repifermin (keratinocyte growth factor-2) has been shown to reduce inflammation in animal models of colitis. AIM: To evaluate repifermin for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. METHODS: Eighty-eight patients with active ulcerative colitis were enrolled in a 6-week, double-blind trial. Patients were randomized to receive treatment for five consecutive days with intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1, 5, 10, 25 or 50 microg/kg, or placebo. The primary objective of the study was to evaluate the safety of repifermin. The primary efficacy outcome was clinical remission at week 4, defined as a score of zero on the endoscopic appearance and stool blood components of the Mayo score and a score of zero or unity on the stool frequency and physician's global assessment components. RESULTS: At week 4, the rates of clinical remission in the 1, 5, 10, 25 and 50 microg/kg repifermin groups were 19%, 9%, 0%, 0% and 0%, respectively, and 11% for the placebo group (P = 0.32 for repifermin vs. placebo). The frequencies of commonly occurring adverse events and severe adverse events were similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous repifermin at a dose of 1-50 microg/kg was very well tolerated, but there was no evidence that repifermin was effective for the treatment of active ulcerative colitis at these doses. An additional study to determine the efficacy of repifermin at doses of > 50 microg/kg or for a longer treatment duration may be warranted, as the maximally tolerated dose was not reached in the present study.

Katz J, Shenkman A, Stavropoulos F, Melzer E. · Department of Oral Maxillofacial Surgery and Diagnostic Sciences, College of Dentistry, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610-0416, USA. · Oral Dis. · Pubmed #12617256 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: An assessment of oral symptoms and signs in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). METHODS: Fifty-four patients with IBD, 34 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 20 with ulcerative colitis (UC) participated in the study. Forty-two patients without gastrointestinal disease or complaints attending the orthopedic clinic served as controls. Each patient completed a written questionnaire and was subjected to an oral examination. RESULTS: The main findings of this study were the higher prevalence of halitosis (50% vs 10% P < 0.0008), nausea (30% vs 7%, P < 0.017) and reflux (regurgitation) (45% vs 17%, P < 0.017) in patients with UC, and nausea (50% vs 7%, P < 0.026), dry mouth and halitosis (29% vs 10%, P < 0.026) and vomiting (41% vs 5%, P = 0.01) in patients with CD, compared with controls. Patients with active CD had a higher prevalence of dry mouth, nausea and vomiting compared with controls (46, 69 and 54% vs 10, 7 and 5%, respectively, P < 0.001) and of reflux compared with non-active CD (46% vs 5%, P < 0.001). Patients with active UC had a higher prevalence of halitosis and regurgitation (50 and 60% vs 10 and 17%, P < 0.001) compared with controls. CONCLUSIONS: The present study demonstrates increased frequency of oral signs and symptoms in patients with IBD. Patients with active CD had more oral signs compared with non-active CD patients. Manifestations such as nausea, vomiting, regurgitation and dry mouth may have detrimental effects on teeth and soft tissues of the oral cavity. Communication between gastroenterologists and dentists is imperative for success of the overall treatment of their patients.