Ulcerative Colitis: Heriot AG

Reese GE, Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Yamamoto T, Heriot AG, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP. · Imperial College London, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St Mary's Hospital, 10th Floor QEQM Building, Praed Street, London, UK. · Dis Colon Rectum. · Pubmed #17180251 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study was designed to compare postoperative adverse events and functional outcomes after ileal pouch-anal anastomosis between patients with Crohn's disease and those with non-Crohn's disease diagnoses. METHODS: A literature search was performed to identify studies published between 1980 and 2005 comparing outcomes of patients undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, and indeterminate colitis. Random-effect, meta-analytical techniques were used and sensitivity analysis was performed. RESULTS: Ten studies comprising 3,103 patients (Crohn's disease=225; ulcerative colitis=2,711; indeterminate colitis=167) were included. Patients with Crohn's disease developed more anastomotic strictures than non-Crohn's disease diagnoses (odds ratio, 2.12; P=0.05) and experienced pouch failure more frequently than patients with ulcerative colitis (Crohn's disease vs. ulcerative colitis: 32 vs. 4.8 percent, P<0.001; Crohn's disease vs. indeterminate colitis: 38 vs. 5 percent, P<0.001). Urgency was more common in Crohn's disease compared with non-Crohn's disease: 19 vs. 11 percent (P=0.02). Incontinence occurred more frequently in Crohn's disease compared with non-Crohn's disease patients: 19 vs. 10 percent (odds ratio, 2.4; P=0.01). Twenty-four-hour stool frequency did not differ significantly between Crohn's disease, ulcerative colitis, or indeterminate colitis. Patients with isolated colonic Crohn's disease were not significantly at increased risk of postoperative complications or pouch failure (P=0.06). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Crohn's disease undergoing ileal pouch-anal anastomosis should be appropriately counseled toward poorer functional outcomes and higher failure compared with non-Crohn's disease patients. It maybe possible to preoperatively select patients with isolated colonic Crohn's disease who may benefit from ileal pouch-anal anastomosis with acceptable adverse outcomes.

Lovegrove RE, Tilney HS, Heriot AG, von Roon AC, Athanasiou T, Church J, Fazio VW, Tekkis PP. · Imperial College London, Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St. Mary's Hospital, Praed Street, London, United Kingdom. · Dis Colon Rectum. · Pubmed #16830218 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Restorative proctocolectomy is the procedure of choice for patients undergoing proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis or ulcerative colitis. This meta-analysis was designed to identify differences in adverse events and functional outcomes between these two groups. METHODS: Studies published between 1986 and 2003 that compared outcomes between patients with familial adenomatous polyposis and ulcerative colitis were included. Meta-analytical techniques using random effect models were used to compare short-term and long-term adverse events as well as functional outcomes between the groups. RESULTS: Nineteen studies comprising 5,199 patients (familial adenomatous polyposis, 782; ulcerative colitis, 4,417) were analyzed. There were no significant differences in immediate postoperative adverse events between the two groups. Pouch-related fistulation was significantly increased in the ulcerative colitis group (10.5 percent vs. familial adenomatous polyposis 4.8 percent; odds ratio 2.31; P < 0.001). There was no significant difference in pouch failure between the two groups (ulcerative colitis 5.8 percent vs. familial adenomatous polyposis 4.5 percent; odds ratio 1.22; P = 0.43). The incidence of pouchitis was significantly greater in the ulcerative colitis group (30.1 vs. 5.5 percent; odds ratio 6.44; P < 0.001). Patients with familial adenomatous polyposis had a significant advantage in stool frequency with one less motion per 24 hours (95 percent confidence interval, 0.21-1.76; P = 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: In contrast to studies reporting similar outcomes for patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy for familial adenomatous polyposis or ulcerative colitis, the present meta-analysis suggested that patients with ulcerative colitis are at greater risk of pouch-related fistulation and pouchitis. Although there was an increase in the 24-hour stool frequency in the ulcerative colitis group, this may be accounted for by the younger age at surgery in the familial adenomatous polyposis group.

Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith JJ, Das P, Canero A, Nicholls RJ. · Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Watford Road, Harrow HA1 3UJ, UK. · Br J Surg. · Pubmed #16432813 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This study evaluated outcomes of patients who underwent abdominal salvage ileal pouch redo surgery and identified factors associated with pouch failure following restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: Data on patients who underwent abdominal salvage surgery in a tertiary referral centre between 1985 and 2003 were collected. Outcomes studied included failure of salvage and bowel function of patients with an intact intestine. RESULTS: One hundred and twelve patients underwent 117 pouch salvage procedures for ulcerative colitis (86), indeterminate colitis/ulcerative colitis (eight), indeterminate colitis/Crohn's disease (three), familial adenomatous polyposis (ten) and other conditions (five). The most common indications for pouch salvage were intra-abdominal sepsis (45 patients), anastomotic stricture (13) and retained rectal stump (35). Median follow-up was 46 (range 1-147) months. Twenty-four patients (21.4 per cent) experienced pouch failure, the incidence of which increased with time. The pouch failed in all patients with Crohn's disease. Successful salvage at 5 years was significantly associated with non-septic (85 per cent) rather than septic (61 per cent) indications (P = 0.016). Frequency of night-time defaecation and faecal urgency improved after salvage surgery (P = 0.036 and P = 0.016 respectively at 5-year follow-up; n = 32). CONCLUSION: Abdominal salvage surgery was associated with a failure rate of 21.4 per cent. A successful outcome was less likely when the procedure was carried out for septic compared with non-septic indications. The rate of pouch failure increased with length of follow-up.

Tekkis PP, Fazio VW, Remzi F, Heriot AG, Manilich E, Strong SA. · Department of Colorectal Surgery, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Cleveland, Ohio 44195, USA. · Br J Surg. · Pubmed #15988792 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Pouch-related fistula occurs in 5-10 per cent of patients after restorative proctocolectomy. The present study identified risk factors associated with the development of such fistulas. METHODS: Data on preoperative and postoperative risk factors were recorded from 1965 patients who underwent restorative proctocolectomy in a single tertiary centre between 1983 and 2001. Cox regression analysis was used to identify independent predictors of pouch-perineal, pouch-abdominal wall and pouch-vaginal fistula during follow-up. RESULTS: Median patient follow-up was 4.1 (range 0-19) years. By 15 years' follow-up, pouch-vaginal fistulas had occurred in 44 women (5.2 per cent). The prevalence of ileal pouch-perineal and pouch-abdominal wall fistula was 3.6 per cent (70 patients) and 1.5 per cent (30 patients) respectively. Independent predictors of pouch-related fistula identified by multivariate analysis were diagnosis of indeterminate colitis or Crohn's disease (hazard ratio (HR) 1.28 (95 per cent confidence interval (c.i.) 1.00 to 1.65) and 1.73 (95 per cent c.i. 1.07 to 3.48) respectively versus ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis), previous anal pathology (HR 3.43 (95 per cent c.i. 2.43 to 4.84) and 4.02 (95 per cent c.i. 1.27 to 12.77) respectively for perineal abscess and fistula in ano versus no previous anal pathology), abnormal anal manometry (HR 4.29 (95 per cent c.i. 2.33 to 7.91)), patient sex (HR 0.74 (95 per cent c.i. 0.58 to 0.95) for men versus women) and pelvic sepsis (HR 3.79 (95 per cent c.i. 2.48 to 5.79)). CONCLUSION: This study suggests that Crohn's disease and the clinical signs that favour the diagnosis of Crohn's disease may contribute to the development of pouch-related fistula.

Tekkis PP, Heriot AG, Smith O, Smith JJ, Windsor AC, Nicholls RJ. · Department of Surgery, St Mark's Hospital, Harrow, UK. · Colorectal Dis. · Pubmed #15859957 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: The present study aims to evaluate the short-term and long-term outcomes of patients undergoing restorative proctocolectomy (RPC) for Crohn's disease (CD) and Indeterminate colitis (IC) and to identify factors associated with adverse outcomes. METHODS: A descriptive study of 52 patients with CD or IC from a total of 1652 patients undergoing primary or salvage RPC in a single tertiary referral centre between 1978 and 2003. Primary outcomes were ileal pouch failure (excision or indefinite diversion), adverse events and functional outcomes (bowel frequency, urgency and continence). RESULTS: Patients with IC or IC favouring ulcerative colitis (Group 1, n = 26) had a pouch failure rate of 11.5%vs 57.5% for patients with CD or IC favouring CD (Group 2, n = 26). Pouch salvage surgery was undertaken in 15 patients with a 13.3% failure rate. Patients in Group 2 were 2.6 times more likely (95% CI: 0.96-7. No significant differences were evident between CD and IC patients with regards to pelvic sepsis (19.2%vs 15.4%), anastomotic stricture (23.1%vs 21.7%), small bowel obstruction (26.9%vs 26.9%) or pouchitis (15.4%vs 11.5%). The 24-h bowel frequency (7.5 vs 8), faecal urgency, daytime or night time incontinence were similar between patients with CD or IC..17) to develop a pouch-related fistula than patients in Group 1. DISCUSSION: Crohn's disease and to a great extent indeterminate colitis favouring CD were both associated with high failure rates and postoperative pouch-related fistula rates. Despite these problems, functional outcomes for patients with CD or IC were similar. Patients with IC should remain candidates for RPC but careful pre-operative assessment is advised to exclude clinical signs favouring the diagnosis of CD. The complications associated with failure are extensive and the option of reconstructive surgery in patients with CD should be questioned.

Heriot AG, Tekkis PP, Smith JJ, Bona R, Cohen RG, Nicholls RJ. · Department of Surgery, St. Mark's Hospital, London, United Kingdom. · Dis Colon Rectum. · Pubmed #15747067 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to assess the short-term and long-term outcomes of surgical repair of patients with pouch-vaginal fistulas after restorative proctocolectomy. METHODS: A descriptive study was undertaken of all patients developing pouch-vaginal fistulas following restorative proctocolectomy between 1978 and 2003 in a single tertiary referral institution. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used to evaluate the time to first pouch-vaginal fistula recurrence and pouch-vaginal fistula-free survival at last follow-up. RESULTS: Sixty-eight patients (mean age, 32.2 years; standard deviation, 10.7) were identified with a median follow-up of 5.5 (range, 0.2-25.5) years. The origin of the pouch-vaginal fistulas was the pouch-anal anastomosis in 52 (76.5 percent) patients, pouch body/top in 9 (13.2 percent), or cryptoglandular or other source in 7 (10.3 percent). Associated early complications in patients with pouch-vaginal fistulas included pelvic sepsis in 20 (29 percent) patients, anastomotic separation in 6 (24 percent), anastomotic stricture in 16 (24 percent), small bowel obstruction in 17 (25 percent), hemorrhage in 2 (3 percent), or pouchitis in 12 (18 percent). Surgery was undertaken in 59 (87 percent) patients with 14 (20.6 percent) of them undergoing pouch excision/diversion or seton drainage. Forty-five (66 percent) patients underwent primary repair. First recurrence of pouch-vaginal fistula occurred in 27 of 45 (60 percent) patients with a median pouch-vaginal fistula-free interval of 1.6 years (95 percent confidence interval, 0.6-2.7). Fourteen (51.9 percent) patients with recurrent pouch-vaginal fistulas healed following one or more repeat procedures. The diagnosis of Crohn's disease was made in eight (12 percent) patients, with pouch-vaginal fistulas persisting or recurring in all patients with Crohn's disease within five years of the primary treatment. Median pouch-vaginal fistula-free survival was 1.4 years for patients with Crohn's disease and 8.1 years for patients with ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis. The pouch-vaginal fistula-free survival improved with repeated local or abdominal repairs for patients with ulcerative colitis. The overall pouch failure rate for patients with pouch-vaginal fistulas was 35 percent (median pouch survival, 4.2 years). CONCLUSIONS: Pouch-vaginal fistulas can persist and recur indefinitely, even after repeated repairs. Repair in those patients with Crohn's disease uniformly failed within five years from primary repair. Patients with recurrent pouch-vaginal fistulas and ulcerative colitis should be offered salvage surgery because successful closure following initial failure occurs in approximately 50 percent.