Ulcerative Colitis: D'Haens G

Melange M, D'Haens G, Devos M, Kartheuser A, Louis E, Pattyn P, Pelckmans P, Penninckx F, Potvin P, Schapira M, Van de Stadt J, Van Gossum AV, Anonymous00094. · No affiliation provided · Acta Gastroenterol Belg. · Pubmed #11189986 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

D'Haens G. · No affiliation provided · Digestion. · Pubmed #16410687 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

D'Haens G. · No affiliation provided · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #15940648 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

D'Haens G, Sandborn WJ, Feagan BG, Geboes K, Hanauer SB, Irvine EJ, Lémann M, Marteau P, Rutgeerts P, Schölmerich J, Sutherland LR. · University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #17258735 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

D'Haens G, Daperno M. · Imelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imelda General Hospital, Department of Gastroenterology, Bonheiden, Belgium. · Curr Gastroenterol Rep. · Pubmed #17105690 No free full text.

Abstract: The medical management of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) has changed considerably since the advent of biologic treatments. In this review we offer a critical evaluation of controlled studies with biologic agents for the management of both Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC). Biologics under evaluation or approved for UC that are discussed include monoclonal antibodies to tumor necrosis factor ([TNF]) infliximab), inhibitors of adhesion molecules (MLN02 and alicaforsen), anti-CD3 antibodies (visilizumab), and anti-interleukin (IL)-2 receptor antibodies (daclizumab). Biologics under evaluation or approved for CD that are reviewed include three monoclonal antibodies to TNF (infliximab, adalimumab, and certolizumab pegol), monoclonal antibodies against IL-12, interferon-chi, and IL-6 receptors, inhibitors of adhesion molecules (natalizumab, alicaforsen), and growth factors. Only the chimeric monoclonal anti-TNF antibody infliximab is currently available worldwide. The potency of this agent in moderate-to-severe UC and CD has been one of the most important advances in the care of IBD in the past decade.

Baert F, Vermeire S, Noman M, Van Assche G, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P. · Department of Gastroenterology, at the University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. · Acta Clin Belg. · Pubmed #15641402 No free full text.

Abstract: The conventional medical treatment of IBD consists of aminosalicylates, corticosteroids, immunosuppressive drugs (azathioprine, 6-mercaptopurin, methotrexate, cyclosporin) and antibiotics. The only drugs able to modify the disease course are azathioprine, its metabolite 6-mercaptopurin and methotrexate. However, these drugs have a slow onset of action and are associated with important side-effects in some patients, necessitating the discontinuation of the drug. Moreover, up to 60% of patients do not respond to these drugs long-term. Fortunately, the management of IBD has entered a new era in the beginning of the 1990s with the development of new biological therapies, selectively blocking the inflammatory cascade. The novel molecules have arisen from the increasing knowledge about the disease pathogenesis and their production has been precipitated by the techniques of molecular biology. Infliximab, the first available biological for Crohn's disease has certainly revolutionised standard treatment. Because of its profound clinical, endoscopic and histological effects, the standard step up approach in the treatment of IBD has been challenged. A large array of new rationally designed biologicals, with a better safety profile and equally selectively acting is underway, and is likely to change our current practise even more dramatically in the next decade.

Kulnigg S, Stoinov S, Simanenkov V, Dudar LV, Karnafel W, Garcia LC, Sambuelli AM, D'Haens G, Gasche C. · Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine III, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #18371137 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AIMS: Anemia is a common complication of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD) This multicenter study tested the noninferiority and safety of a new intravenous iron preparation, ferric carboxymaltose (FeCarb), in comparison with oral ferrous sulfate (FeSulf) in reducing iron deficiency anemia (IDA) in IBD. METHODS: Two hundred patients were randomized in a 2:1 ratio (137 FeCarb:63 FeSulf) to receive FeCarb (maximum 1,000 mg iron per infusion) at 1-wk intervals until the patients' calculated total iron deficit was reached or FeSulf (100 mg b.i.d.) for 12 wk. The primary end point was change in hemoglobin (Hb) from baseline to week 12. RESULTS: The median Hb improved from 8.7 to 12.3 g/dL in the FeCarb group and from 9.1 to 12.1 g/dL in the FeSulf group, demonstrating noninferiority (P= 0.6967). Response (defined as Hb increase of >2.0 g/dL) was higher for FeCarb at week 2 (P= 0.0051) and week 4 (P= 0.0346). Median ferritin increased from 5.0 to 323.5 mug/L at week 2, followed by a continuous decrease in the FeCarb group (43.5 mug/L at week 12). In the FeSulf group, a moderate increase from 6.5 to 28.5 mug/L at week 12 was observed. Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) occurred in 28.5% of the FeCarb and 22.2% of the FeSulf groups, with discontinuation of study medication due to AEs in 1.5% and 7.9%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: FeCarb is effective and safe in IBD-associated anemia. It is noninferior to FeSulf in terms of Hb change over 12 wk, and provides a fast Hb increase and a sufficient refill of iron stores.

D'Haens G, Hommes D, Engels L, Baert F, van der Waaij L, Connor P, Ramage J, Dewit O, Palmen M, Stephenson D, Joseph R. · Department of Gastroenterology, Imelda General Hospital, Imelda GI Clinical Research Center, Imeldalaan, Bonheiden, Belgium. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #16984503 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: SPD476 (MMX mesalazine), is a novel, once daily, high-strength mesalazine formulation (1.2 g/tablet) that utilizes Multi Matrix System (MMX) technology to delay and extend delivery of the active drug throughout the colon. AIM: To assess the safety and efficacy of MMX mesalazine in patients with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis, in a pilot, phase II, randomized, multicentre, double-blind, parallel-group, dose-ranging study (SPD476-202). METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis were randomized to MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 or 4.8 g/day given once daily for 8 weeks. Remission ulcerative colitis-disease activity index (UC-DAI) < or =1, a score of 0 for rectal bleeding and stool frequency, and > or =1 -point reduction in sigmoidoscopy score from baseline was the primary end point. RESULTS: Week 8 remission rates were 0%, 31% and 18% of patients receiving MMX mesalazine 1.2, 2.4 and 4.8 g/day respectively. No statistically significant difference in remission was observed between treatment groups. MMX mesalazine 2.4 and 4.8 g/day groups demonstrated greater improvement in overall UC-DAI and component scores from baseline, compared with the 1.2 g/day group. CONCLUSION: MMX mesalazine given as 2.4 or 4.8 g/day once daily is well tolerated and effective for the treatment of mild-to-moderately active ulcerative colitis.

Tilg H, Vogelsang H, Ludwiczek O, Lochs H, Kaser A, Colombel JF, Ulmer H, Rutgeerts P, Krüger S, Cortot A, D'Haens G, Harrer M, Gasche C, Wrba F, Kuhn I, Reinisch W. · Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Innsbruck, Austria. · Gut. · Pubmed #14633951 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pilot studies of interferon alpha (IFN-alpha) suggest a high remission rate in the treatment of active ulcerative colitis. We evaluated the safety of pegylated interferon alpha (PegIFN) and its role in induction of remission in patients with active ulcerative colitis, in a multicentre placebo controlled trial. METHODS: Sixty patients with a clinical activity score (CAI) of >6 were randomised to receive placebo (n=20), PegIFN 0.5 microg/kg (n=19), or PegIFN 1.0 microg/kg body weight (n=21) once weekly (PegIntron; Schering-Plough, USA) over 12 weeks. Patients receiving 5-aminosalicylates, steroids, and/or azathioprine in stable dosages were included. RESULTS: Serious adverse events were seen in none of the placebo patients, in 3/19 patients in the PegIFN 0.5 microg/kg group (hospitalisation due to disease flare up n=3), and in 3/21 in the PegIFN 1.0 microg/kg group (hospitalisation due to disease flare up n=1; thrombosis n=1; grand mal seizure n=1). Otherwise, we observed only minor IFN-alpha side effects. Clinical remission rates at week 12 (CAI < or =4) were 7/20 (35%) in the placebo, 9/19 (47%) in the PegIFN 0.5 microg/kg group, and 7/21 (33%) in the PegIFN 1.0 microg/kg group (NS). Early withdrawal from the study was observed in 11/20 placebo patients, in 6/19 in the PegIFN 0.5 microg/kg group, and in 10/21 in the PegIFN 1.0 microg/kg group, mainly due to lack of efficacy. The higher PegIFN dose was associated with a significant decrease in levels of C reactive protein (p=0.003, day 0 v 85). CONCLUSIONS: PegIFN is safe but not effective, at the dosages used, in patients with ulcerative colitis.

Van Assche G, D'Haens G, Noman M, Vermeire S, Hiele M, Asnong K, Arts J, D'Hoore A, Penninckx F, Rutgeerts P. · Department of Gastroenterology, University of Leuven, 49, Herestraat, Leuven 3000, Belgium. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #14517785 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Cyclosporine A is highly effective in severe attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC) but is associated with important adverse effects that are mainly dose dependent. Our single center, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial aimed to evaluate the additional clinical benefit of 4 mg/kg over 2 mg/kg IV cyclosporine in the acute treatment of severe UC. METHODS: Primary end point was the proportion of patients with a clinical response. Secondary end points included time to response, colectomy rate, and adverse effects. RESULTS: Seventy-three patients were included. Day-8 response rates were 84.2% (32 of 38, 4 mg/kg) and 85.7% (32 of 35, 2 mg/kg) after a median of 4 days in both groups. Short-term colectomy rates were 13.1% (4 mg/kg) and 8.6% (2 mg/kg). Mean cyclosporine blood levels were 237 +/- 33 in the 2-mg/kg group and 332 +/- 43 ng/mL in the 4-mg/kg group. Active smoking was inversely correlated with clinical response (odds ratio, 0.06), but concomitant azathioprine or steroids were not predictive. A trend toward a higher incidence of hypertension was observed in the 4-mg/kg group (23.7% vs. 8.6%, 2 mg/kg, P < 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: High-dose IV cyclosporine has no additional clinical benefit over low dose in the treatment of severe UC. Although we did not observe differences in adverse effects on the short term, the use of 2 mg/kg IV cyclosporine should provide an improved toxicity profile for medical treatment of severe UC.

D'Haens G, Lemmens L, Geboes K, Vandeputte L, Van Acker F, Mortelmans L, Peeters M, Vermeire S, Penninckx F, Nevens F, Hiele M, Rutgeerts P. · Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital Gasthuisberg, Leuven, Belgium. · Gastroenterology. · Pubmed #11313301 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND & AIMS: Cyclosporine has been effective in patients with steroid-refractory attacks of ulcerative colitis (UC). We investigated the effects of intravenous (IV) cyclosporine as single IV therapy (without glucocorticosteroids) for severe UC and compared these with the response to glucocorticosteroids. METHODS: Patients with a severe attack of UC were randomized to treatment with IV cyclosporine, 4 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1), or with methylprednisolone, 40 mg/day, in a randomized, double-blind, controlled trial. After 8 days, patients who had a response received the same medication orally in combination with azathioprine. Patients were followed up clinically, endoscopically, and by scintigraphy. Renal function was assessed using urinary inulin clearances. Endpoints were clinical improvement, discharge from the hospital, and remission up to 12 months after intravenous therapy. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. After 8 days, 8 of 15 patients (53%) who received methylprednisolone had a response to therapy vs. 9 of 14 (64%) receiving cyclosporine. In nonresponders, 3 of 7 methylprednisolone patients and 1 of 3 cyclosporine patients improved when both treatments were combined. No serious drug-related toxicity was observed with either treatment. At 12 months, 7 of 9 patients (78%) initially controlled with cyclosporine maintained their remission vs. 3 of 8 (37%) initially treated with methylprednisolone. No clinically significant decrease of renal function was observed. CONCLUSIONS: Cyclosporine monotherapy is an effective and safe alternative to glucocorticosteroids in patients with severe attacks of UC.

Bennink R, Peeters M, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P, Mortelmans L. · Department of Nuclear Medicine, Academic Medical Center Amsterdam, The Netherlands. · Clin Nucl Med. · Pubmed #11201494 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Ulcerative colitis (UC) is a chronic inflammatory bowel disease with frequent exacerbations, including the risk for toxic megacolon and severe complications. In very active disease, colonoscopy should not be performed to assess the severity and the extent of the disease. The aim of the current study was to determine whether Tc-99m HMPAO-labeled white blood cell (WBC) scintigraphy can be used as an alternative to colonoscopy to determine the extent and the severity of the disease in critically ill patients. METHODS: Twenty consecutive patients (7 women, 13 men; age 38.1 +/- 13.1 years) who had a severe attack of UC underwent scintigraphy on the day of admission. Leukocytes were labeled with 200 MBq (5.35 mCi) Tc-99m HMPAO. Planar anterior and posterior imaging of the abdomen was performed 45 and 120 minutes after WBC reinjection. The tracer uptake in the different colon segments was scored visually compared with bone marrow uptake. A symptom score was made and C-reactive protein was measured as a serologic marker of inflammation. Rectosigmoidoscopy with biopsy was performed within 24 hours of scintigraphy. Scintigraphic, endoscopic, and histologic results were compared for disease activity. RESULTS: The mean symptom score was 12.7 (+/-0.7) on a scale of 21, and mean the C-reactive protein level was 6.8 (+/-1.2) mg/l. No significant difference was found between the scintigraphic score of the rectum and the endoscopic or the histologic score. The best correlation was found with the latter (r = 0.66, P < 0.01). Based on the results of scintigraphy, disease involved the left side of the colon up to the splenic flexure in 10 patients. The other patients had pancolitis. CONCLUSIONS: Disease severity can be determined adequately by planar WBC scintigraphy in patients with severe attacks of UC. Because the presence and severity of disease correlates well with endoscopic and histologic findings, WBC scintigraphy can assess disease extent without the need for colonoscopy. This decreases the number and severity of complications that can occur in already critically ill patients.

Cortot A, Maetz D, Degoutte E, Delette O, Meunier P, Tan G, Cazals JB, Dewit O, Hebuterne X, Beorchia S, Grunberg B, Leprince E, D'Haens G, Forestier S, Idier I, Lémann M. · Gastroenterologie, Hôpital Claude Huriez, Lille, France. · Am J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #19086960 No free full text.

Abstract: AIM: To determine in a noninferiority study whether mesalamine foam is as effective as mesalamine liquid enema for inducing clinical remission in patients with active left-sided ulcerative colitis (UC). METHODS: In a multicenter investigator-blind trial, 375 patients with mild-to-moderate UC were randomized to receive mesalamine foam 1 g/80 mL/day or mesalamine liquid enema 1 g/100 mL/day for 4 wk (W). Inclusion criteria were: disease extension at least 5 cm from anorectal junction and not above splenic flexure and Clinical Activity Index (CAI) 1-4 > or = 4. Primary end point was clinical remission at W4 defined as a CAI 1-4 < or = 2. Noninferiority of the foam to liquid enema was declared if the lower limit of the 97.5% unilateral confidence interval (97.5% CI) of the difference in remission rates between foam and liquid enema groups was greater than -15% . RESULTS: Remission rates at W4 in foam versus liquid were 68.3%versus 73.6% in per protocol (PP) population (lower limit of 97.5% CI -15.1%) and 66.7%versus 70.5% in intention-to-treat (ITT) population (97.5% CI -13.4%). Remission rates at W2 were 48.1 %versus 50.6% in ITT (97.5% CI -12.8%) and 49.1%versus 52.1% in PP (97.5% CI -13.8%) in foam versus liquid, respectively. Both treatments were well tolerated. CONCLUSIONS: A 4-wk treatment of 1 g mesalamine foam induced a clinical remission in 68% patients versus 73% with 1 g mesalamine liquid enema. Although the noninferiority of mesalamine foam could not be strictly demonstrated at W4 in the PP analysis, it was achieved in the ITT population and at W2 in both populations. Mesalamine foam represents a therapeutic alternative to mesalamine liquid enema in patients with mild-to-moderate active proctitis and proctosigmoiditis.

Holtmann MH, Krummenauer F, Claas C, Kremeyer K, Lorenz D, Rainer O, Vogel I, Böcker U, Böhm S, Büning C, Duchmann R, Gerken G, Herfarth H, Lügering N, Kruis W, Reinshagen M, Schmidt J, Stallmach A, Stein J, Sturm A, Galle PR, Hommes DW, D'Haens G, Rutgeerts P, Neurath MF. · First Department of Medicine, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany. · Dig Dis Sci. · Pubmed #16927148 No free full text.

Abstract: In Crohn's disease the optimal duration of azathioprine treatment is still controversial and for ulcerative colitis only limited data are available to support its efficacy. Charts of 1176 patients with IBD from 16 European centers were analyzed. Flare incidences and steroid dosages were assessed for the time before and during treatment and after discontinuation. Within the first 4 years, azathioprine suppressed flare incidence and steroid consumption in both diseases (P < 0.001). While in CD discontinuation after 3-4 years did not lead to reactivation, this was the case in UC. However, continuation beyond 4 years further improved clinical activity in CD and steroid requirement in both diseases (P < 0.001). Discontinuation of azathioprine may thus be considered after 3-4 years in CD patients in complete remission without steroid requirement. In all other CD patients and for UC patients in general, continuation seems beneficial. These results support a novel differential algorithm for long-term azathioprine therapy in IBD.

Arts J, D'Haens G, Zeegers M, Van Assche G, Hiele M, D'Hoore A, Penninckx F, Vermeire S, Rutgeerts P. · Department of Internal Medicine, University Hospital, Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #15168804 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: Iv cyclosporin A (CSA) is an effective therapy in patients with severe ulcerative colitis (UC). It remains unclear if this treatment affects the course of the disease in the long run. We investigated the long-term efficacy and safety in 86 patients with ulcerative colitis treated with i.v. CSA at our center. METHODS: The records of all patients treated with i.v. CSA between 11/1992 and 11/2000 were reviewed. RESULTS: Seventy-two of 86 patients (83.7%) responded to i.v. CSA therapy, administered for a mean of 9 +/- 2 days. Following the initial treatment, 69 patients (96%) were discharged on oral CSA with mean blood CSA concentrations of 192 +/- 55 ng/mL. Azathioprine was added in 64 (89%) patients. A second treatment with CSA was necessary in 11 patients; 1 patient received three courses of i.v. treatment. The duration of follow-up averaged 773 +/- 369 days. Patients who were responders but were still having certain symptoms at discharge had a higher incidence of colectomy during follow-up. Of all initial responders, 18 (25%) underwent colectomy after a mean interval of 178 +/- 141 days. The life-table predicts that of all treated patients, 55% will avoid a colectomy during a period of 3 years. Complications of CSA treatment were mostly reversible, but 3 patients (3.5%) died of opportunistic infections (1 of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia and 2 of Aspergillus fumigatus pneumoniae). One patient with anaphylactic shock caused by the CSA solvent was successfully resuscitated. CONCLUSIONS: CSA is an effective treatment of the majority of patients with severe attacks of UC, although the toxicity and even mortality associated with its use necessitates careful evaluation, selection, and follow-up.

Elseviers MM, D'Haens G, Lerebours E, Plane C, Stolear JC, Riegler G, Capasso G, Van Outryve M, Mishevska-Mukaetova P, Djuranovic S, Pelckmans P, De Broe ME, Anonymous00354. · Department of Nephrology, University Hospital of Antwerp, Belgium. · Clin Nephrol. · Pubmed #14989626 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In recent years, several case reports have been published suggesting an association between the use of 5-aminosalicylic acid (5-ASA) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and the development of chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis. Apart from lesions associated to 5-ASA treatment, however, it is clear that IBD itself may also induce renal impairment, albeit the frequency is unknown. METHODS: During 1 year, all IBD patients seen at the outpatient clinic of 27 European centres of gastro-enterology were registered and screened for renal impairment controlling for a possible association with 5-ASA therapy. Patients were questioned about their medical and drug history and their IBD disease activity. Renal screening (calculated creatinine clearance) was performed at baseline, after 6 and 12 months. RESULTS: Included patients (n = 1,529) had a mean age of 39 (range 14-98), 56% had Crohn's disease, 42% ulcerative colitis and 2% indeterminate colitis. Half of the patients used 5-ASA during the study period. Decreased creatinine clearance was observed in 34 patients, among them 13 with chronic renal impairment. Comparing patients with and without renal impairment, no difference could be observed in 5-ASA consumption. In contrast, patients with renal impairment were significantly older, had a lower body mass index and showed a higher frequency of male sex, bowel resection and stoma. CONCLUSION: Although the association between 5-ASA therapy and chronic tubulo-interstitial nephritis is clearly described in several case reports, this prospective study came to the reassuring conclusion that renal impairment in IBD patients is not frequently observed and is rarely associated with 5-ASA therapy.

Van Assche G, Baert F, De Reuck M, De Vos M, De Wit O, Hoang P, Louis E, Mana F, Pelckmans P, Rutgeerts P, Van Gossum A, D'Haens G. · Department of Internal Medicine-Gastroenterology, UZ Gasthuisberg, Herestraat 49, 3000 Leuven, Belgium. · Acta Gastroenterol Belg. · Pubmed #12619425 No free full text.

Abstract: Aminosalicylates (5-ASA, sulfasalazine and mesalazine) play a central role in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). For acute treatment of mild to moderate flares and in maintenance treatment, their efficacy has been established. Since ulcerative colitis is limited to the distal colon in two thirds of the patients, topical therapy also plays an important role. In mild/moderate active disease 5-ASA 4 g/d is as effective as oral corticosteroids. Ulcerative proctitis is treated with 2 x 500 mg or 1 x 1 g suppositories and proctosigmoiditis with 1 to 4 g enemas. Oral 5-ASA is also safe in maintenance treatment and is generally well tolerated. The risk of colorectal tumours is increased in patients with longstanding ulcerative colitis and epidemiological evidence indicates that chronic 5-ASA treatment reduces this risk. However, at present there is insufficient evidence to maintain patients on life-long 5-ASA maintenance treatment for this indication.