Ulcerative Colitis: Bar-Meir S

Eliakim R, Tulassay Z, Kupcinskas L, Adamonis K, Pokrotnieks J, Bar-Meir S, Lavy A, Mueller R, Greinwald R, Chermesh I, Gross V, Anonymous00328. · Gastroenterology Department, Rambam Medical Center, Haifa, Israel. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #17944738 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Rectally administered mesalazine (mesalamine; 5-aminosalicylic acid) is the first-line therapy for treatment of distal ulcerative colitis. Recently, a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam has been shown to be as effective and safe as standard 5-aminosalicylic acid enema. AIM: To study the efficacy and safety of a low-volume vs. a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam. METHODS: In this investigator-blinded study, patients with active distal ulcerative colitis [Clinical Activity Index (CAI) > 4, Endoscopic Index > or = 4] were randomized to receive 2 x 1 g/30 mL low-volume (n = 163) or 2 x 1 g/60 mL high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam (n = 167) for 42 days. Primary end point was clinical remission (CAI < or = 4) at the final/withdrawal visit (per-protocol). RESULTS: 330 patients were evaluable for efficacy and safety by intention-to-treat, 290 for per-protocol analysis. Clinical remission rates at week 6 (per-protocol) were 77% on low-volume foam vs. 77% on high-volume foam (P = 0.00002 for non-inferiority). The low-volume foam was associated with a lower frequency of severe discomfort, pain and retention problems. CONCLUSIONS: Low-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam is as effective and safe as a high-volume 5-aminosalicylic acid foam in the treatment of active distal ulcerative colitis, but offers compliance advantages compared to the high-volume preparation.

Kruis W, Bar-Meir S, Feher J, Mickisch O, Mlitz H, Faszczyk M, Chowers Y, Lengyele G, Kovacs A, Lakatos L, Stolte M, Vieth M, Greinwald R. · Evangelisches Krankenhaus Kalk, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany. · Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. · Pubmed #15017515 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND AIMS: 5-Aminosalicylate is the gold standard for inducing remission in patients with mildly to moderately active ulcerative colitis. The optimal dose is as yet not defined. Despite some recent developments, the ideal formulation for 5-aminosalicylic acid is still awaited. A new pellet preparation was designed combining slow and delayed release properties. Aims of the study were to find the optimal dose and to test efficacy and safety of a new 5-aminosalicylic acid formulation. METHODS: Three hundred twenty-one patients were included in a double-blind multicenter trial. Inclusion criteria were active ulcerative colitis (Clinical Activity Index [CAI] and Endoscopic Index [EI] according to Rachmilewitz, CAI 6-12; EI >/=4). Three different doses of 5-aminosalicylic acid (0.5 g 3 times a day, 1.0 g 3 times a day, and 1.5 g 3 times a day) were studied for 8 weeks. RESULTS: Clinical remission rate (CAI </=4) was highest in the 1.0 g 3 times a day group (66 %), 50% in the 0.5 g 3 times a day group, and 55% in the 1.5 g 3 times a day group. Hierarchical testing showed no significance, indicating a lack of dose response across the 3 mesalamine doses. In addition, times to first clinical response were similar: 26.5 days (1.0 g 3 times a day), 27.5 days (0.5 g 3 times a day), and 21.5 days (1.5 g 3 times a day). Endoscopic improvement was better with 1.0 g mesalamine 3 times a day than with 0.5 g 3 times a day, but overall endoscopic and histologic improvement was not different between treatment groups. Baseline activity, duration, and localization of ulcerative colitis did have some influence on the therapeutic activity, but there was no significant interaction with the dose of the study drug. Safety, with special focus on kidney function, was excellent in all 3 groups. CONCLUSIONS: There is no significant dose response between mesalamine 1.5 g/day, 3.0 g/day, and 4.5 g/day. The optimal dose to induce remission of ulcerative colitis is 0.5 g 5-aminosalicylic acid 3 times a day. Patients failing with this dose may benefit from an increase of the dose up to 1.0 g 3 times a day, but should also be considered for alternative treatment. A newly developed pellet formulation of 5-aminosalicylic acid has promising efficacy and excellent safety.

Bar-Meir S, Fidder HH, Faszczyk M, Bianchi Porro G, Sturniolo GC, Mickisch O, Müller R, Greinwald R, Chowers Y, Grobeta V, Anonymous00042. · Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Hashomer, Israel. · Dis Colon Rectum. · Pubmed #12847368 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Rectal administration of corticosteroids is advocated in patients with proctosigmoiditis who have failed therapy with mesalamine enema. Foam offers patients better tolerability than an enema. In this study the efficacy and adverse effects of a new budesonide foam are compared with the presently available hydrocortisone foam. METHODS: Two hundred fifty-one patients with proctosigmoiditis were randomly assigned to receive either budesonide foam or hydrocortisone foam for eight weeks. RESULTS: Remission rates were comparable in the budesonide and hydrocortisone groups, 53 and 52 percent, respectively. The mean disease activity index for the two groups decreased to a similar extent, from 7.2 +/- 1.9 and 7 +/- 2 to 3.6 +/- 3.1 and 3.9 +/- 3.4 in the budesonide and hydrocortisone groups, respectively. In a subgroup of patients who had not responded to rectal administration of mesalamine, 23 of 44 (52 percent) patients who received budesonide responded favorably to the foam, as compared with 14 of 38 (37 percent) patients who received hydrocortisone (P = not significant). Low plasma cortisol occurred in 3 percent of the budesonide group and in none of the hydrocortisone patients. CONCLUSIONS: This trial demonstrates a similar efficacy and safety of the two foams in patients with proctosigmoiditis.

Bourreille A, Ignjatovic A, Aabakken L, Loftus EV, Eliakim R, Pennazio M, Bouhnik Y, Seidman E, Keuchel M, Albert JG, Ardizzone S, Bar-Meir S, Bisschops R, Despott EJ, Fortun PF, Heuschkel R, Kammermeier J, Leighton JA, Mantzaris GJ, Moussata D, Lo S, Paulsen V, Panés J, Radford-Smith G, Reinisch W, Rondonotti E, Sanders DS, Swoger JM, Yamamoto H, Travis S, Colombel JF, Van Gossum A, Anonymous00249. · Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, CHU, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. · Endoscopy. · Pubmed #19588292 No free full text.

Abstract: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong diseases seen predominantly in the developed countries of the world. Whereas ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition causing diffuse and continuous mucosal inflammation of the colon, Crohn's disease is a heterogeneous entity comprised of several different phenotypes, but can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. A change in diagnosis from Crohn's disease to ulcerative colitis during the first year of illness occurs in about 10 % - 15 % of cases. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) restricted to the colon that cannot be characterized as either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease is termed IBD-unclassified (IBDU). The advent of capsule and both single- and double-balloon-assisted enteroscopy is revolutionizing small-bowel imaging and has major implications for diagnosis, classification, therapeutic decision making and outcomes in the management of IBD. The role of these investigations in the diagnosis and management of IBD, however, is unclear. This document sets out the current Consensus reached by a group of international experts in the fields of endoscopy and IBD at a meeting held in Brussels, 12-13th December 2008, organised jointly by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and the Organisation Mondiale d'Endoscopie Digestive (OMED). The Consensus is grouped into seven sections: definitions and diagnosis; suspected Crohn's disease; established Crohn's disease; IBDU; ulcerative colitis (including ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]); paediatric practice; and complications and unresolved questions. Consensus guideline statements are followed by comments on the evidence and opinion. Statements are intended to be read in context with qualifying comments and not read in isolation.

Lahat A, Avidan B, Bar-Meir S, Chowers Y. · Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center and Sackler School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel. · Inflamm Bowel Dis. · Pubmed #17206677 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Diverticulosis is associated with high intracolonic pressure and a weakened bowel wall. Chronic colitis is characterized by liquid stools suggestive of low intracolonic pressure and a thickened bowel wall. Therefore, the aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of diverticulosis in colitis patients. METHODS: Colonoscopy results of patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)-associated colitis older than 50 years were retrospectively evaluated and compared with those of patients who underwent screening colonoscopy. Only patients with biopsy-proven disease, disease duration of more than 5 years, and disease beyond the distal 20 cm were included. RESULTS: In all, 1037 patients were diagnosed by colonoscopy as suffering from IBD-associated colitis between 1987-2005. After exclusion of patients who did not meet the inclusion criteria the study population consisted of 314 IBD patients and 1023 age-matched control patients. A significantly higher percent of diverticuli was detected in the control group compared with the IBD group (15% versus 3.5%, P < 0.001). No significant difference in the prevalence of diverticuli was detected between the three subtypes of IBD patients (2% in ulcerative colitis versus 4.7% in Crohn's colitis versus 7.6% in indeterminant colitis). Neither disease duration nor the specific colonic segment involved had a significant influence on the prevalence of diverticulosis. CONCLUSIONS: Long-standing colonic inflammation in IBD patients is associated with a lower prevalence of diverticuli.

Fidder HH, Heijmans R, Chowers Y, Bar-Meir S, Avidan B, Pena AS, Crusius JB. · Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, 52621 Tel Hashomer, Israel. · Int J Immunogenet. · Pubmed #16611251 No free full text.

Abstract: Tumour necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha is an important pro-inflammatory cytokine that has been implicated in the pathogenesis of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). The promoter TNF-857 C-->T single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is functional through the binding to the transcription factor octamer transcription factor-1 (OCT-1). In order to investigate the frequency of this SNP in Israeli Jewish IBD patients, we analysed a cohort of well-characterized patients, 153 with Crohn's disease (CD) and 78 with ulcerative colitis (UC) and 188 healthy controls individually matched for age, sex and ethnicity. Forty-one per cent of the patients were of Ashkenazi and 48% were of non-Ashkenazi background. The remaining 11% were of mixed Ashkenazi-non-Ashkenazi background. Patients and controls were genotyped for the TNF-857 SNP by Taqman technology. Stratification for the CARD15 Arg702Trp, Gly908Arg and Leu1007fsinsC mutations took place in 136 CD patients. Carrier frequency of TNF-857T between CD and controls (36% vs. 40%; P = 0.556; OR: 1.18, 95% CI 0.74-1.88), or between UC and controls (41% vs. 37%; P = 0.743; OR: 0.85, 95% CI 0.45-1.62) did not differ significantly. Neither did stratifying for the presence of at least one of the common CARD15 mutations result in a significant difference between CD and controls. No associations were found between TNF-857T and CD phenotype as defined by the Vienna classification, perianal disease or extra-intestinal disease irrespective of CARD15 carrier status. In conclusion, it appears that TNF-857 SNP does not contribute to susceptibility of IBD, neither does it define the phenotype of CD in Israeli Jewish IBD patients.

Gross V, Bar-Meir S, Lavy A, Mickisch O, Tulassay Z, Pronai L, Kupcinskas L, Kiudelis G, Pokrotnieks J, Kovács A, Faszczyk M, Razbadauskas A, Margus B, Stolte M, Müller R, Greinwald R, Anonymous00134. · Hospital St. Marien, Amberg, Germany. · Aliment Pharmacol Ther. · Pubmed #16393311 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Rectal budesonide is an effective treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis. AIM: To compare the therapeutic efficacy, tolerability and safety, and patient's preference of budesonide foam vs. budesonide enema. METHODS: Patients with active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis (clinical activity index > 4 and endoscopic index > or = 4) were eligible for this double-blind, double-dummy, randomized, multicentre study. They received 2 mg/25 mL budesonide foam and placebo enema (n = 265), or 2 mg/100 mL budesonide enema and placebo foam (n = 268) for 4 weeks. Primary endpoint was clinical remission (clinical activity index < or = 4) at the final/withdrawal visit (per protocol). RESULTS: A total of 541 patients were randomized--533 were evaluable for intention-to-treat analysis and 449 for per protocol analysis. Clinical remission rates (per protocol) were 60% for budesonide foam and 66% for budesonide enema (P = 0.02362 for non-inferiority of foam vs. enema within a predefined non-inferiority margin of 15%). Both formulations were safe and no drug-related serious adverse events were observed. Because of better tolerability and easier application most patients preferred foam (84%). CONCLUSION: Budesonide foam is as effective as budesonide enema in the treatment of active ulcerative proctitis or proctosigmoiditis. Both budesonide formulations are safe, and most patients prefer foam.

Fidder HH, Olschwang S, Avidan B, Zouali H, Lang A, Bardan E, Picard O, Bar-Meir S, Colombel JF, Chowers Y. · Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Affiliated with the Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Israel. · Am J Med Genet A. · Pubmed #12923865 No free full text.

Abstract: Ulcerative colitis (UC) and Crohn's disease (CD) are heterogeneous disorders characterized by chronic intestinal inflammation. Genetic predisposition is a major risk factor in both diseases. The CARD15 (NOD2) gene has been implied as a candidate gene in the pathogenesis CD. Our aim was to delineate the frequency of three missense and one frameshift variant of CARD15 in Israeli Jewish CD and UC patients. DNA was extracted from blood samples from 238 unrelated inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) patients, 68 with UC and 170 with CD. The DNA was genotyped for two missense mutations, R675W and G881R, and one frameshift mutation, 980FS981X. Mutations in CARD15 were observed with significantly greater frequency in CD patients (46/170, 27%) than in UC patients (7/68, 10%) (P = 0.005). Homozygous and compound heterozygous carriers were restricted to seven (4%) patients with CD as compared to none of the UC patients (P = 0.01). Similar rates in Ashkenazi and non-Ashkenazi Jewish patients were observed. Age-of-onset of disease was lower in Ashkenazi mutation carriers as compared to non-carriers of Ashkenazi origin (18.7 +/- 8.6 years vs. 25.8 +/- 13.4 years, respectively, P = 0.03). No other phenotypic characteristics could distinguish mutation carriers from non-carriers. We conclude that germline mutations in the CARD15 gene are more frequently found in CD than UC patients and appear to predict an earlier age-of-onset in Ashkenazi Jewish patients. No association could be demonstrated between CARD15 mutations and specific disease course or behavior.

Lahav M, Levite M, Bassani L, Lang A, Fidder H, Tal R, Bar-Meir S, Mayer L, Chowers Y. · Department of Gastroenterology, Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Tel Hashomer, Israel. · Clin Exp Immunol. · Pubmed #11876744 links to  free full text

Abstract: Lidocaine and related local anaesthetics have been shown to be effective in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC). However, the mechanisms underlying their therapeutic effect are poorly defined. Intestinal epithelial cells play an important role in the mucosal inflammatory response that leads to tissue damage in UC via the secretion of pro-inflammatory cytokines and chemokines. The aim of this study was to evaluate the direct immunoregulatory effect of lidocaine on pro-inflammatory cytokine and chemokine secretion from intestinal epithelial cells. HT-29 and Caco-2 cell lines were used as a model system and treated with lidocaine and related drugs. The expression of IL-8, IL-1beta and the IL-1 receptor antagonist (RA) were assessed by ELISA and quantification of mRNA. In further experiments, the effect of lidocaine on the secretion of IL-8 from freshly isolated epithelial cells stimulated with TNFalpha was tested. Lidocaine, in therapeutic concentrations, inhibited the spontaneous and TNFalpha-stimulated secretion of IL-8 and IL-1beta from HT-29 and Caco-2 cell lines in a dose-dependent manner. Similarly, suppression of IL-8 secretion was noted in the freshly isolated epithelial cells. Other local anaesthetics, bupivacaine and amethocaine, had comparable effects. Lidocaine stimulated the secretion of the anti-inflammatory molecule IL-1 RA. Both the inhibitory and the stimulatory effects of lidocaine involved regulation of transcription. The results imply that the therapeutic effect of lidocaine may be mediated, at least in part, by its direct effects on epithelial cells to inhibit the secretion of proinflammatory molecules on one hand while triggering the secretion of anti-inflammatory mediators on the other.