Ulcerative Colitis: Aabakken L

Laake KO, Bjørneklett A, Aamodt G, Aabakken L, Jacobsen M, Bakka A, Vatn MH. · Department of Medicine, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · Scand J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15841713 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Pouchitis is a common and troublesome condition in patients operated on with ileal-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA). A disturbed microecology in the pouch has been suggested as one possible explanation. In a previous double-blind, randomized, controlled study we demonstrated clinical improvement of symptoms in patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) operated on with IPAA, during intervention with live probiotic microbes Lactobacilli and Bifidobacteriae. The aim of the present study was to confirm our previous results in a much larger material, including clinical symptoms, faecal flora and endoscopic evaluation, and to compare the results in UC/IPAA patients with those of patients with familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) with IPAA and UC patients with ileorectal anastomosis (IRA). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Five hundred millilitres of a fermented milk product (Cultura) containing live lactobacilli (La-5) and bifidobacteriae (Bb-12) was given daily for 4 weeks to 51 UC patients and 10 patients with FAP, operated on with IPAA, and six UC patients operated on for IRA. Stool samples were cultured for examination of lactobacilli, bifidobacteriae, fungi and pH before, during and after intervention. Before, during and after intervention, endoscopic evaluation was performed. Categorized symptomatology was examined prospectively using diary cards in addition to an interview, before and on the last day of intervention. RESULTS: The number of lactobacilli and bifidobacteriae increased significantly during intervention in the UC patients operated on with IPAA and remained significantly increased one week after intervention. Involuntary defecation, leakage, abdominal cramps and the need for napkins (category I), faecal number and consistency (category II) and mucus and urge to evacuate stools (category III) were significantly decreased during intervention in the UC/IPAA group. In the FAP group there was a significant decrease in faecal leakage, abdominal cramps and use of napkins (category I) during intervention. The median endoscopic score of inflammation was significantly decreased during intervention in the UC/IPAA patients. Blood tests, faecal fungi and faecal pH did not change significantly during intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Results of this extended study, showing an effect of probiotics on symptoms and endoscopic inflammation in UC patients operated on with IPAA confirm our previously reported effect of probiotics on clinical symptoms and endoscopic score in a smaller, double-blind, randomized, controlled study. The significantly higher response to probiotics in families with increased risk of IBD will have to be repeated in future studies.

Laake KO, Line PD, Grzyb K, Aamodt G, Aabakken L, Røset A, Hvinden AB, Bakka A, Eide J, Bjørneklett A, Vatn MH. · Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Dept of Medicine,Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · Scand J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15743000 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is a common and troublesome condition in patients operated on with ileal-pouch-anal-anastomosis (IPAA). A disturbed mucosal perfusion in the pouch has been suggested as a possible cause. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used successfully to measure gastric and colonic mucosal perfusion in humans. In a previous study, we demonstrated a reduced mucosal perfusion in the distal part of the pouch, during probiotic intervention, examined by LDF measurement. The aim of the present study was to confirm our previous results in a much larger material, and to compare the results of LDF measurements and inflammatory activity in ulcerative colitis (UC) patients with those in familial adenomatous polyposis (FAP) patients. METHODS: Five hundred millilitres of a fermented milk product (Cultura), containing live lactobacilli (La-5) and bifidobacteria (Bb-12), was given daily for 4 weeks to 41 UC and 10 patients with FAP, operated on with IPAA. Mucosal perfusion was measured with LDF and the degree of inflammation was examined at predefined levels of the distal bowel by histology and faecal calprotectin measurements both before and after intervention. We also evaluated the applicability of a Pouchitis Disease Activity Index (PDAI). RESULTS: The LDF measurements were reproducible in the pelvic pouch at each of the predefined levels, but did not change during intervention. Mucosal perfusion was significantly reduced in the distal compared to the proximal part of the pouch in the UC group (P < 0.05). The perfusion levels were higher in the FAP patients compared to the UC patientsat all predefined levels (P < 0.05). Calprotectin levels and histological score did not change significantlyafter intervention in any of the groups. The calprotectin level was significantly lower in the FAP compared to the UC group both before and after intervention. The PDAI decreased in both groups from alevel considered diagnostic for pouchitis to a level considered as not active pouchitis. The decreasewas significant for the UC patients. CONCLUSIONS: The results did not demonstrate an effect of probiotics on histology, although a significant effect on the PDAI was achieved, which concurs with the previously reported effect on symptoms and endoscopic score. The significantly reduced blood flow in the UC group compared to the FAP group, operated on with the same procedure, and the significantly increased calprotectin levels in the UC group, are original findings. Both findings may be related to an increased risk for pouchitis among UC patients. The lack of effect of intervention on mucosal perfusion does not exclude a role for reduced circulation as a cause of pouchitis based on the reduced LDF measurements in the distal part of the pouch.

de Lange T, Larsen S, Aabakken L. · Department of Gastroenterology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · BMC Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #15149550 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Endoscopic findings are essential in evaluating the disease activity in ulcerative colitis. The aim of this study was to evaluate how endoscopists assess individual endoscopic features of mucosal inflammation in ulcerative colitis, the inter-observer agreement, and the importance of the observers' experience. METHODS: Five video clips of ulcerative colitis were shown to a group of experienced and a group of inexperienced endoscopists. Both groups were asked to assess eight endoscopic features and the overall mucosal inflammation on a visual analogue scale. The following statistical analyses were used; Contingency tables analysis, kappa analysis, analysis of variance, Pearson linear correlation analysis, general linear models, and agreement analysis. All tests were carried out two-tailed, with a significance level of 5%. RESULTS: The inter-observer agreement ranged from very good to moderate in the experienced group and from very good to fair in the inexperienced group. There was a significantly better inter-observer agreement in the experienced group in the rating of 6 out of 9 features (p < 0.05). The experienced and inexperienced endoscopists scored the "ulcerations" significantly different. (p = 0.05). The inter-observer variation of the mean score of "erosions", "ulcerations" and endoscopic activity index in mild disease, and the scoring of "erythema" and "oedema" in moderate-severe disease was significantly higher in the inexperienced group.A correlation was seen between all the observed endoscopic features in both groups of endoscopists. Among experienced endoscopists, a set of four endoscopic variables ("Vascular pattern", "Erosions", "Ulcerations" and Friability") explained 92% of the variation in EAI. By including "Granularity" in these set 91% of the variation in EAI was explained in the group of inexperienced endoscopists. CONCLUSION: The inter-observer agreement in the rating of endoscopic features characterising ulcerative colitis is satisfactory in both groups of endoscopists but significantly higher in the experienced group. The difference in the mean score between the two groups is only significant for "ulcerations". The endoscopic variables "Vascular pattern", "Erosions", "Ulcerations" and Friability" explained the overall endoscopic activity index. Even though the present result is quite satisfactory, there is a potential of improvement. Improved grading systems might contribute to improve the consistency of endoscopic descriptions.

Laake KO, Line PD, Aabakken L, Løtveit T, Bakka A, Eide J, Roseth A, Grzyb K, Bjørneklett A, Vatn MH. · Research Institute of Internal Medicine, Dept. of Medicine, Rikshospitalet University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · Scand J Gastroenterol. · Pubmed #12739713 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Pouchitis is a common and troublesome condition, and a disturbed microbiological flora and mucosal blood flow in the pouch have been suggested as possible causes. Laser Doppler flowmetry (LDF) has been used successfully to measure gastric and colonic mucosal perfusion in humans. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of intervention with probiotics on ileal pouch inflammation and perfusion in the pouch, assessed by endoscopy, histology, fecal calprotectin and LDF. METHODS: A fermented milk product (Cultura; 500 ml) containing live lactobacilli (La-5) and bifidobacteria (Bb-12) was given daily for 4 weeks to 10 patients operated with ileal-pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) for ulcerative colitis (UC). Mucosal perfusion was measured with LDF and the degree of inflammation was examined at predefined levels of the distal bowel by endoscopy and histology. Stool samples were cultured for lactobacilli and bifidobacteria and calprotectin were measured before and after intervention. RESULTS: The LDF measurements were reproducible in the pelvic pouch at each of the predefined levels, but did not change after intervention. The mucosal perfusion was reduced in the distal compared to the proximal part of the pouch. Calprotectin levels did not change significantly after intervention. The median endoscopic score for inflammation was significantly reduced by 50% after intervention, whereas the histological score did not change significantly. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that probiotics primarily act superficially, with change of gross appearance of the mucosa at endoscopy, but without significant effect on histological picture, mucosal perfusion or faecal calprotectin, during a relatively short period of 4 weeks.

Bourreille A, Ignjatovic A, Aabakken L, Loftus EV, Eliakim R, Pennazio M, Bouhnik Y, Seidman E, Keuchel M, Albert JG, Ardizzone S, Bar-Meir S, Bisschops R, Despott EJ, Fortun PF, Heuschkel R, Kammermeier J, Leighton JA, Mantzaris GJ, Moussata D, Lo S, Paulsen V, Panés J, Radford-Smith G, Reinisch W, Rondonotti E, Sanders DS, Swoger JM, Yamamoto H, Travis S, Colombel JF, Van Gossum A, Anonymous00249. · Institut des Maladies de l'Appareil Digestif, CHU, Université de Nantes, Nantes, France. · Endoscopy. · Pubmed #19588292 No free full text.

Abstract: Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis are lifelong diseases seen predominantly in the developed countries of the world. Whereas ulcerative colitis is a chronic inflammatory condition causing diffuse and continuous mucosal inflammation of the colon, Crohn's disease is a heterogeneous entity comprised of several different phenotypes, but can affect the entire gastrointestinal tract. A change in diagnosis from Crohn's disease to ulcerative colitis during the first year of illness occurs in about 10 % - 15 % of cases. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) restricted to the colon that cannot be characterized as either ulcerative colitis or Crohn's disease is termed IBD-unclassified (IBDU). The advent of capsule and both single- and double-balloon-assisted enteroscopy is revolutionizing small-bowel imaging and has major implications for diagnosis, classification, therapeutic decision making and outcomes in the management of IBD. The role of these investigations in the diagnosis and management of IBD, however, is unclear. This document sets out the current Consensus reached by a group of international experts in the fields of endoscopy and IBD at a meeting held in Brussels, 12-13th December 2008, organised jointly by the European Crohn's and Colitis Organisation (ECCO) and the Organisation Mondiale d'Endoscopie Digestive (OMED). The Consensus is grouped into seven sections: definitions and diagnosis; suspected Crohn's disease; established Crohn's disease; IBDU; ulcerative colitis (including ileal pouch-anal anastomosis [IPAA]); paediatric practice; and complications and unresolved questions. Consensus guideline statements are followed by comments on the evidence and opinion. Statements are intended to be read in context with qualifying comments and not read in isolation.

de Lange T, Svensen AM, Larsen S, Aabakken L. · Department of Gastroenterology, Faculty Division Ullevål University Hospital, University of Oslo, Norway. · Gastrointest Endosc. · Pubmed #16500394 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Validation studies of medical images are required before the general use of new imaging techniques, and they necessitate a substantial number of observers. Multicenter studies are desirable but the logistic challenges are considerable. OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to develop and test the functionality and reliability of an Internet interface for distributed evaluation of endoscopic still images and video clips. DESIGN: An Internet site for assessment of endoscopic still images and video clips was developed. To avoid limitations of the bandwidth, a solution was developed to launch and score high-quality video clips on digital video disks (DVDs) from the Internet interface. SETTING: Fifty-five observers were enrolled in the randomized, prospective multicenter study of still images. The feasibility study of video clips included 7 observers. PATIENTS: Four patients presenting with various degree of ulcerative colitis, ranging from normal to severe, were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: We tested the reliability of the interface by dual-image assessment, as well as the feasibility of Internet assessment of endoscopic images. We physically distributed high-quality DVD video footage. RESULTS: We recorded 2084 assessments of endoscopic still images and 35 assessments of video clips. The reliability of the Internet interface was confirmed by adequate repeatability and intraobserver agreement of the assessments. Video clips running from a DVD were also successfully shown on the Internet interface. Thus, high-quality video may be assessed independently of the Internet bandwidth. CONCLUSIONS: The present Internet-based tool is functional, efficient, and reliable for high-volume assessment of endoscopic images and video clips.

de Lange T, Larsen S, Aabakken L. · Department of Gastroenterology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · Gastrointest Endosc. · Pubmed #15855977 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Previous studies have shown deficiencies in the endoscopy reports and substantial interobserver variation in the assessments of endoscopic findings. The aim of this study was to determine how to perform systematic digital image documentation in ulcerative colitis and to evaluate if mucosal inflammation is assessed equally on a still image and on a video clip. METHODS: Eighteen video clips and their corresponding photographs that visualize different severities of ulcerative colitis were shown in randomized order to 20 experienced endoscopists. They assessed the mucosal inflammation of each image twice on a visual analog scale. Three comparisons were performed between the video clips, the photographs, and the video clips to the photographs, respectively. RESULTS: The mean score of the inflammation of the video clips at tape 1 and 2 was 4.74: 95% confidence interval (CI)[4.41, 5.08] and 4.90: 95% CI[4.56, 5.24), respectively, and of the photographs 4.53: 95% CI[4.19, 4.88] and 4.43: 95% CI[4.09, 4.77], respectively. The first answer explains 83% of the variation in the second answer for all comparisons, and the agreement index ranged from 0.38 to 0.42. CONCLUSIONS: The mucosal inflammation might be documented nearly as well with a still image as on a video clip. Systematic use of still images probably improves the endoscopy reports by adding more objective information about the mucosal inflammation.

de Lange T, Moum BA, Tholfsen JK, Larsen S, Aabakken L. · Department of Gastroenterology, Ullevaal University Hospital, Oslo, Norway. · Endoscopy. · Pubmed #14551861 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS: The text report is the primary tool for documenting endoscopic findings but there is no consensus on the content and structure of these reports. Therefore, at four Norwegian hospitals, the content of endoscopy reports concerning ulcerative colitis was assessed. Quality indices for the medical history of active ulcerative colitis and endoscopic signs of inflammation were determined, as well as technical items in the report. The effect of structured compared with free-text reporting was evaluated. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Endoscopy reports in 445 cases of ulcerative colitis were retrieved. Two of the hospitals used a semi-structured computerized documentation system, and two hospitals used transcription-based free-text reports. RESULTS: A substantial amount of information was missing in the majority of the reports. Individual endoscopic signs of inflammation were defined in 27 % - 77 % of the reports. Various clinical symptoms of active ulcerative colitis were defined in 1 % - 44 % of the reports. We observed a reminder effect of structured systems in that they prompted more informative reports. There was a tendency towards better free-text documentation in the transcription-based systems than in the free text of the semi-structured ones. CONCLUSIONS: There is a potential for improving the content, completeness and standardization of endoscopy reports. Standardization efforts may be a part of the solution.