Breast Neoplasms: Wade JL

Visvanathan K, Chlebowski RT, Hurley P, Col NF, Ropka M, Collyar D, Morrow M, Runowicz C, Pritchard KI, Hagerty K, Arun B, Garber J, Vogel VG, Wade JL, Brown P, Cuzick J, Kramer BS, Lippman SM, Anonymous00092. · Cancer Policy and Clinical Affairs, 2318 Mill Rd, Suite 800, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #19470930 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE To update the 2002 American Society of Clinical Oncology guideline on pharmacologic interventions for breast cancer (BC) risk reduction. METHODS A literature search identified relevant randomized trials published since 2002. Primary outcome of interest was BC incidence (invasive and noninvasive). Secondary outcomes included BC mortality, adverse events, and net health benefits. An expert panel reviewed the literature and developed updated consensus guidelines. Results Seventeen articles met inclusion criteria. In premenopausal women, tamoxifen for 5 years reduces the risk of BC for at least 10 years, particularly estrogen receptor (ER) -positive invasive tumors. Women < or = 50 years of age experience fewer serious side effects. Vascular and vasomotor events do not persist post-treatment across all ages. In postmenopausal women, raloxifene and tamoxifen reduce the risk of ER-positive invasive BC with equal efficacy. Raloxifene is associated with a lower risk of thromboembolic disease, benign uterine conditions, and cataracts than tamoxifen in postmenopausal women. No evidence exists establishing whether a reduction in BC risk from either agent translates into reduced BC mortality. Recommendations In women at increased risk for BC, tamoxifen (20 mg/d for 5 years) may be offered to reduce the risk of invasive ER-positive BC, with benefits for at least 10 years. In postmenopausal women, raloxifene (60 mg/d for 5 years) may also be considered. Use of aromatase inhibitors, fenretinide, or other selective estrogen receptor modulators to lower BC risk is not recommended outside of a clinical trial. Discussion of risks and benefits of preventive agents by health providers is critical to patient decision making.

Lower EE, Esparaz BT, Garnett SA, Wade JL. · University of Cincinnati Medical Center, OH 45219, USA. · Clin Breast Cancer. · Pubmed #17509166 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Most postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive advanced breast cancer eventually develop resistance to endocrine therapy, resulting in disease progression and the need for further treatment. Fulvestrant's distinct mode of action offers the potential to overcome tumor resistance to previous endocrine treatments. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This observational, postmarketing, Web-based surveillance study collected "real-world" information on the use of, and the outcomes associated with, fulvestrant 250-mg-per month treatment of patients with advanced breast cancer in clinical practice. RESULTS: A total of 213 postmenopausal patients with advanced breast cancer were enrolled from 34 practices throughout the United States. Of these, 200 patients (93.9%) had received previous endocrine therapy. Overall, 85.4% of patients had received previous aromatase inhibitor treatment for early breast cancer, advanced breast cancer, or both. In clinical practice, fulvestrant was most frequently administered as a second-line (46% of patients) or a third-line endocrine treatment (27.7% of patients) for advanced disease. Most patients who discontinued fulvestrant (55.1%) subsequently received cytotoxic chemotherapy. Fulvestrant treatment resulted in clinical benefit for 47.9% of patients; 58 patients (27.2%) exhibited an objective response, of whom 3 exhibited a complete response. The median time to response was 2.1 months, and the median duration of response was 7.6 months. At the time of analysis, 74.6% of patients had experienced disease progression; median time to progression was 4.7 months. CONCLUSION: These findings are similar to those reported in the clinical trial setting and confirm that fulvestrant has clinical activity after progression on previous endocrine therapy, including aromatase inhibitors.

Land SR, Wickerham DL, Costantino JP, Ritter MW, Vogel VG, Lee M, Pajon ER, Wade JL, Dakhil S, Lockhart JB, Wolmark N, Ganz PA. · National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project (NSABP) Operations and Biostatistical Centers, Department of Biostatistics, Graduate School of Public Health, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #16754728 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Tamoxifen has been approved for breast cancer risk reduction in high-risk women, but how raloxifene compares with tamoxifen is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To compare the differences in patient-reported outcomes, quality of life [QOL], and symptoms in Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene (STAR) participants by treatment assignment. DESIGN, SETTING, PARTICIPANTS, AND INTERVENTIONS: STAR was a double-blind, randomized phase 3 prevention trial designed to evaluate the relative efficacy of raloxifene vs tamoxifen in reducing the incidence of invasive breast cancer in high-risk postmenopausal women. Between July 1, 1999, and November 4, 2004, 19,747 participants were enrolled at centers throughout North America, with a median potential follow-up time of 4.6 years (range, 1.2-6.5 years). Patient-reported symptoms were collected from all participants using a 36-item symptom checklist. Quality of life was measured with the Medical Outcomes Study Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36), the Center for Epidemiologic Studies-Depression (CES-D), and the Medical Outcomes Study Sexual Activity Questionnaire in a substudy of 1983 participants, median potential follow-up 5.4 years (range, 4.6-6.0 years). Questionnaires were administered before treatment, every 6 months for 60 months and at 72 months. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary QOL end points were the SF-36 physical (PCS) and mental (MCS) component summaries. RESULTS: Among women in the QOL analysis, mean PCS, MCS, and CES-D scores worsened modestly over the study's 60 months, with no significant difference between the tamoxifen (n = 973) and raloxifene (n = 1010) groups (P>.2). Sexual function was slightly better for participants assigned to tamoxifen (age-adjusted repeated measure odds ratio, 1.22%; 95% CI, 1.01-1.46). Of the women in the symptom assessment analyses, the 9769 in the raloxifene group reported greater mean symptom severity over 60 months of assessments than the 9743 in the tamoxifen group for musculoskeletal problems (1.15 vs 1.10, P = .002), dyspareunia (0.78 vs 0.68, P<.001), and weight gain (0.82 vs 0.76, P<.001). Women in the tamoxifen group reported greater mean symptom severity for gynecological problems (0.29 vs 0.19, P<.001), vasomotor symptoms (0.96 vs 0.85, P<.001), leg cramps (1.10 vs 0.91, P<.001), and bladder control symptoms (0.88 vs 0.73, P<.001). CONCLUSIONS: No significant differences existed between the tamoxifen and raloxifene groups in patient-reported outcomes for physical health, mental health, and depression, although the tamoxifen group reported better sexual function. Although mean symptom severity was low among these postmenopausal women, those in the tamoxifen group reported more gynecological problems, vasomotor symptoms, leg cramps, and bladder control problems, whereas women in the raloxifene group reported more musculoskeletal problems, dyspareunia, and weight gain. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003906.

Rivera E, Valero V, Arun B, Royce M, Adinin R, Hoelzer K, Walters R, Wade JL, Pusztai L, Hortobagyi GN. · Department of Breast Medical Oncology, The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 424, Houston, TX 77030-4009, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12947059 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We conducted a phase II clinical trial to determine the clinical efficacy and safety of pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine in patients with metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were eligible if they had measurable disease, no prior chemotherapy for metastatic disease, and a performance status </= 2 on the Zubrod scale. Patients received pegylated liposomal doxorubicin 24 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1, plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1 and 8 of each 21-day cycle. RESULTS: Of 49 patients enrolled, 27 had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy (19 with an anthracycline). Prior median cumulative anthracycline dose was 240 mg/m2. In total, three complete responses and 21 partial responses were achieved in 46 assessable patients, for an overall response rate of 52% (95% confidence interval, 37% to 67%). Responses were observed in 11 (58%) of 19 patients with previous anthracycline exposure. Median response duration was 5.6 months, time to progression was 4.5 months, and overall survival was 16.1 months. Although the most common grade 3 to 4 toxicities were hematologic, few neutropenic complications resulted. The most frequent nonhematologic toxicities were nausea and vomiting, fatigue, stomatitis, and hand-foot syndrome. One patient previously treated with an anthracycline developed a transient decrease (21%) in the left ventricular ejection fraction, with cardiac function recovering within 2 months. CONCLUSION: Pegylated liposomal doxorubicin in combination with gemcitabine is active and well tolerated in patients with metastatic breast cancer. Median overall survival was 16.1 months, and approximately 78% of patients derived clinical benefit from treatment. This regimen represents a therapeutic option for patients receiving front-line therapy for their metastatic breast cancer.

Vogel VG, Costantino JP, Wickerham DL, Cronin WM, Cecchini RS, Atkins JN, Bevers TB, Fehrenbacher L, Pajon ER, Wade JL, Robidoux A, Margolese RG, James J, Lippman SM, Runowicz CD, Ganz PA, Reis SE, McCaskill-Stevens W, Ford LG, Jordan VC, Wolmark N, Anonymous00147. · Magee-Womens Hospital, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, Pa 15213-3221, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #16754727 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Tamoxifen is approved for the reduction of breast cancer risk, and raloxifene has demonstrated a reduced risk of breast cancer in trials of older women with osteoporosis. OBJECTIVE: To compare the relative effects and safety of raloxifene and tamoxifen on the risk of developing invasive breast cancer and other disease outcomes. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: The National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial, a prospective, double-blind, randomized clinical trial conducted beginning July 1, 1999, in nearly 200 clinical centers throughout North America, with final analysis initiated after at least 327 incident invasive breast cancers were diagnosed. Patients were 19,747 postmenopausal women of mean age 58.5 years with increased 5-year breast cancer risk (mean risk, 4.03% [SD, 2.17%]). Data reported are based on a cutoff date of December 31, 2005. INTERVENTION: Oral tamoxifen (20 mg/d) or raloxifene (60 mg/d) over 5 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Incidence of invasive breast cancer, uterine cancer, noninvasive breast cancer, bone fractures, thromboembolic events. RESULTS: There were 163 cases of invasive breast cancer in women assigned to tamoxifen and 168 in those assigned to raloxifene (incidence, 4.30 per 1000 vs 4.41 per 1000; risk ratio [RR], 1.02; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.82-1.28). There were fewer cases of noninvasive breast cancer in the tamoxifen group (57 cases) than in the raloxifene group (80 cases) (incidence, 1.51 vs 2.11 per 1000; RR, 1.40; 95% CI, 0.98-2.00). There were 36 cases of uterine cancer with tamoxifen and 23 with raloxifene (RR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.35-1.08). No differences were found for other invasive cancer sites, for ischemic heart disease events, or for stroke. Thromboembolic events occurred less often in the raloxifene group (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.54-0.91). The number of osteoporotic fractures in the groups was similar. There were fewer cataracts (RR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.68-0.92) and cataract surgeries (RR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.68-0.99) in the women taking raloxifene. There was no difference in the total number of deaths (101 vs 96 for tamoxifen vs raloxifene) or in causes of death. CONCLUSIONS: Raloxifene is as effective as tamoxifen in reducing the risk of invasive breast cancer and has a lower risk of thromboembolic events and cataracts but a nonstatistically significant higher risk of noninvasive breast cancer. The risk of other cancers, fractures, ischemic heart disease, and stroke is similar for both drugs. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00003906.

Roscoe JA, Jean-Pierre P, Morrow GR, Hickok JT, Issell B, Wade JL, King DK. · University of Rochester Medical Center-URCC Community Clinical Oncology Program (CCOP) Research Base, Rochester, NY, USA. · J Soc Integr Oncol. · Pubmed #16737668 No free full text.

Abstract: The present study examines the efficacy of acupressure wristbands, compared with standard care alone and acustimulation wristbands, in preventing severe nausea among 86 breast cancer patients receiving doxorubicin-based chemotherapy who were at high risk of experiencing severe nausea following treatment. Significant differences in the proportion of patients who reported severe nausea were observed across three conditions (standard care, standard care with acupressure bands, and standard care with an acustimulation band). The proportion of patients in the acupressure band group who reported severe nausea following their chemotherapy treatment (41%) was significantly less than that of the standard care group (68%) and the acustimulation band group (73%). Overall, these findings showed that acupressure wristbands were efficacious and may be an appropriate form of adjuvant therapy for nausea management for breast cancer patients, especially those who are most at risk for experiencing severe nausea following chemotherapy treatment.