Breast Neoplasms: Vicini FA

Smith BD, Arthur DW, Buchholz TA, Haffty BG, Hahn CA, Hardenbergh PH, Julian TB, Marks LB, Todor DA, Vicini FA, Whelan TJ, White J, Wo JY, Harris JR. · Radiation Oncology Flight, Wilford Hall Medical Center, Lackland AFB, TX, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #19545784 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To present guidance for patients and physicians regarding the use of accelerated partial-breast irradiation (APBI), based on current published evidence complemented by expert opinion. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A systematic search of the National Library of Medicine's PubMed database yielded 645 candidate original research articles potentially applicable to APBI. Of these, 4 randomized trials and 38 prospective single-arm studies were identified. A Task Force composed of all authors synthesized the published evidence and, through a series of meetings, reached consensus regarding the recommendations contained herein. RESULTS: The Task Force proposed three patient groups: (1) a "suitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is acceptable, (2) a "cautionary" group, for whom caution and concern should be applied when considering APBI outside of a clinical trial, and (3) an "unsuitable" group, for whom APBI outside of a clinical trial is not generally considered warranted. Patients who choose treatment with APBI should be informed that whole-breast irradiation (WBI) is an established treatment with a much longer track record that has documented long-term effectiveness and safety. CONCLUSION: Accelerated partial-breast irradiation is a new technology that may ultimately demonstrate long-term effectiveness and safety comparable to that of WBI for selected patients with early breast cancer. This consensus statement is intended to provide guidance regarding the use of APBI outside of a clinical trial and to serve as a framework to promote additional clinical investigations into the optimal role of APBI in the treatment of breast cancer.

Arthur DW, Vicini FA, Kuske RR, Wazer DE, Nag S, Anonymous00286. · Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond 23298-0058, USA. · Brachytherapy. · Pubmed #15062164 No free full text.

Abstract: Logistical barriers of time and travel created by the conventional six week course of radiotherapy prevent many women from pursuing breast conservation treatment. For the past 12 years, Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) has been investigated as a potential alternative treatment approach in women with early stage breast cancer. The ability to complete treatment in five days has the potential to provide additional women with the option of breast conservation. The validity of this APBI is supported in the study of in-breast recurrence patterns, pathologic data and the clinical treatment experience. The review of the recent data on contemporary APBI reveals that patient selection criteria and brachytherapy quality assurance are clearly critical components and necessary to assure a successful treatment outcome. This updated report from the American Brachytherapy Society on Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation reviews the appropriate background data supporting this treatment approach with conclusions regarding patient selection criteria and treatment delivery.

Arthur DW, Vicini FA, Kuske RR, Wazer DE, Nag S, Anonymous00345. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond 23298-0058, USA. · Brachytherapy. · Pubmed #15062155 No free full text.

Abstract: Logistical barriers of time and travel created by the conventional six-week course of radiotherapy prevent many women from pursuing breast conservation treatment. For the past 12 years, Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation (APBI) has been investigated as a potential alternative treatment approach in women with early stage breast cancer. The ability to complete treatment in five days has the potential to provide additional women with the option of breast conservation. The validity of this APBI is supported in the study of in-breast recurrence patterns, pathologic data and the clinical treatment experience. The review of the recent data on contemporary APBI reveals that patient selection criteria and brachytherapy quality assurance are clearly critical components and necessary to assure a successful treatment outcome. This updated report from the American Brachytherapy Society on Accelerated Partial Breast Irradiation reviews the appropriate background data supporting this treatment approach with conclusions regarding patient selection criteria and treatment delivery.

Arthur DW, Vicini FA. · No affiliation provided · Ann Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #15249340 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Swanson TA, Vicini FA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Beaumont Cancer Institute, William Beaumont Hospital, 3601 West 13 Mile Road, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · Curr Oncol Rep. · Pubmed #18366961 No free full text.

Abstract: Breast conserving therapy (BCT) has become an accepted option in the management of patients with early-stage breast cancer. However, studies have suggested that a lengthy course of adjuvant whole breast irradiation, as a component of BCT, may not always be necessary and that radiation therapy delivered only to the region of the tumor bed may be acceptable in appropriately selected patients. Several modalities are currently being explored as a means to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI), including multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy, the MammoSite breast brachytherapy catheter (Cytyc Corporation, Marlborough, MA), and three-dimensional conformal external-beam radiation therapy. To date, phase 1/2 published data have demonstrated excellent local control rates and cosmesis. As additional data addressing the effectiveness of this treatment approach accumulate, a new standard of care may emerge. This review discusses data accumulated to date exploring the experience with all APBI modalities and presents future studies exploring this concept.

Chen PY, Vicini FA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · Front Radiat Ther Oncol. · Pubmed #17641514 No free full text.

Abstract: Studies evaluating selected patients treated with partial breast irradiation (PBI) in accelerated fractionation schemes have demonstrated the equivalence of PBI with traditional whole-breast irradiation. The major advantage of PBI is the time compression of treatment down to less than 1 week compared with 6.5 weeks for whole-breast external beam treatments. Four techniques are available to deliver PBI. These include interstitial brachytherapy multicatheter systems, the Mammosite Radiation Therapy System applicator, external beam three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy and intraoperative radiation therapy. For the two brachytherapy techniques of multicatheter implantation and the Mammosite, accurate placement is achieved with image guidance via intraoperative ultrasonography, mammography, and/or CT scanning. Technologies such as image-guided cone beam CT assure accurate delivery of PBI with external beam three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy. Results of PBI show excellent control rates with mild toxicities; cosmetic outcomes are good to excellent in the vast majority of patients.

Fearmonti RM, Vicini FA, Pawlik TM, Kuerer HM. · The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Surgical Oncology-Unit#444, 1400 Holcombe Boulevard, #FC.12.3000, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Surg Clin North Am. · Pubmed #17498539 No free full text.

Abstract: The use of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) in place of whole-breast irradiation (WBI) for breast-conservation therapy (BCT) is an area of intensive clinical investigation. This article describes evolving methods of APBI in comparison to WBI and in the setting of ongoing clinical trials.

Vicini FA, Arthur DW. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073-6769, USA. · Semin Radiat Oncol. · Pubmed #15809936 No free full text.

Abstract: Accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) has been investigated for over a decade as a potential alternative adjuvant treatment approach after lumpectomy for women with early-stage breast cancer. The rationale for APBI is based on pathologic data regarding the spread of cancer within the breast and study of the patterns of in-breast recurrence after breast-conserving therapy performed with or without whole-breast irradiation. This report reviews the North American experience using interstitial brachytherapy for APBI. Studies achieving low failure rates have universally been distinguished from those with high failure rates by requiring documented microscopically negative surgical margins, using a target definition consisting of the lumpectomy cavity plus a 1- to 2-cm margin, and having a rigorous quality assurance program to assure target coverage. We conclude that APBI brachytherapy programs that include all of these components have great potential to overcome many of the barriers that have prevented women from pursuing standard breast-conserving therapy.

Arthur DW, Vicini FA. · Radiation Oncology Department, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia, Richmond, VA, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15755981 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Arthur DW, Morris MM, Vicini FA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Medical College of Virginia Campus, Richmond, Virginia, USA. · Oncology (Williston Park). · Pubmed #15648295 No free full text.

Abstract: Conventional radiotherapeutic treatment for early and advanced breast cancer has been based on broad-field radiation treatment principles that date back several decades. Although these strategies have been successful, newer techniques now offer the ability to incorporate improved target imaging, dosimetric planning, and treatment delivery into the treatment design. These newer techniques include accelerated partial-breast irradiation and hypofractionated whole-breast irradiation for early-stage breast cancer, and intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for both early and advanced breast cancer. Accelerated partial-breast irradiation and hypofractionated whole-breast radiotherapy are treatment approaches that promise both reduced overall treatment times and the potential for increased use of breast-conservation therapy. IMRT offers unparalleled dose homogeneity and conformality that enables dose reduction to normal structures with the potential to reduce treatment toxicity and improve cosmesis. Based on the published literature, an increasing number of treatment facilities are offering treatment with these techniques. However, further clinical study remains important to thoroughly define the appropriate clinical setting, patient selection criteria, and limitations for each of these innovative treatment approaches.

Kuerer HM, Julian TB, Strom EA, Lyerly HK, Giuliano AE, Mamounas EP, Vicini FA. · Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas 77030, USA. · Ann Surg. · Pubmed #15075650 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To critically review the theoretical and actual risks and benefits of accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) after breast-conserving surgery. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Because of rapid evolution of radiation therapy techniques related to brachytherapy and three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy, APBI has very recently come to the forefront as a potential local treatment option for women with breast cancer. This review aims to give an overview of the biologic rationale for APBI techniques, and benefits and limitations of APBI techniques. METHODS: The authors reviewed the currently available published world medical literature on breast-conserving surgery with and without postoperative irradiation; all studies involving partial breast irradiation, including brachytherapy, for breast cancer; and currently accruing and planned APBI trials. The focus of this review was the early results of treatment in terms of toxicity, complications, cosmesis, and local control. RESULTS: On average, approximately 3% of patients treated with breast-conserving surgery will have an in-breast local recurrence away from the original lumpectomy site with or without postoperative standard whole-breast irradiation. The results of phase I-II studies involving approximately 500 patients treated with APBI after breast-conserving surgery have been published. Although many of the studies have limited long-term follow-up and potential selection bias, early results suggest that toxicity, cosmesis, and local control are comparable to outcomes seen after breast-conserving surgery followed by standard whole-breast irradiation. CONCLUSIONS: Recent advances in radiation delivery and published series of partial breast irradiation support large randomized trials comparing APBI with standard whole-breast irradiation after breast-conserving surgery.

Vicini FA, Recht A. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12039936 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Patients younger than 35 to 45 years old at the time of diagnosis of invasive breast cancer have been found to have a worse prognosis than older patients in many studies. However, the impact of patient age at diagnosis on the outcome of treatment with either lumpectomy and radiation therapy (RT) or mastectomy for patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS) of the breast has not been extensively analyzed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Articles addressing the effect of patient age at diagnosis on the outcome of treatment of DCIS with lumpectomy and RT or mastectomy were identified through the MEDLINE and CancerLit databases and reference lists of relevant articles. Studies were reviewed to determine the impact of patient age at diagnosis on clinical and pathologic features of DCIS, the influence of age on outcome after lumpectomy and RT, and the impact of age on outcome after mastectomy. RESULTS: DCIS in younger patients more frequently contains adverse prognostic pathologic factors and extends over a greater distance in the breast than in older patients. In series with adequate follow-up, younger patients treated with lumpectomy and RT had a significantly higher rate of local recurrence than older patients, especially for invasive local recurrences. Some studies have suggested that careful attention to margin status and excising larger volumes of tissue can reduce this difference substantially. No available data show that younger patients have better long-term cancer-free survival rates if treated by mastectomy rather than lumpectomy and RT. CONCLUSION: Successful treatment of younger patients with DCIS with lumpectomy and RT requires careful attention to patient evaluation, selection, and surgical technique. When this is done, age at diagnosis should not be a contraindication to breast-conserving therapy.

Vicini FA, Baglan KL, Kestin LL, Mitchell C, Chen PY, Frazier RC, Edmundson G, Goldstein NS, Benitez P, Huang RR, Martinez A. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #11283132 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Radiation therapy (RT) restricted to the tumor bed, by means of an interstitial implant, and lasting 4 to 5 days after lumpectomy was prospectively evaluated in early-stage breast cancer patients treated with breast-conserving therapy (BCT). The goals of the study were to determine whether treatment time can be reduced and whether elective treatment of the entire breast is necessary. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between January 1993 and January 2000, 174 cases of early-stage breast cancer were managed with lumpectomy followed by RT restricted to the tumor bed using an interstitial implant. Each brachytherapy patient was matched with one external-beam RT (ERT) patient derived from a reference group of 1,388 patients treated with standard BCT. Patients were matched for age, tumor size, histology, margins of excision, absence of an extensive intraductal component, nodal status, estrogen receptor status, and tamoxifen use. Median follow-up for both the ERT and brachytherapy groups was 36 months. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were noted in the 5-year actuarial rates of ipsilateral breast treatment failure or locoregional failure between ERT and brachytherapy patients (1% v 0%, P =.31 and 2% v 1%, P =.63, respectively). In addition, there were no statistically significant differences noted in rates of distant metastasis (6% v 3%, P =.24), disease-free survival (87% v 91%, P =.55), overall survival (90% v 93%, P =.66), or cause-specific survival (97% v 99%, P =.28). CONCLUSION: Accelerated treatment of breast cancer using an interstitial implant to deliver radiation to the tumor bed alone over 4 to 5 days seems to produce 5-year results equivalent to those achieved with conventional ERT. Extended follow-up will be required to determine the long-term efficacy of this treatment approach.

Nag S, Kuske RR, Vicini FA, Arthur DW, Zwicker RD. · James Cancer Hospital and Solove Research Institute, Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, USA. · Oncology (Williston Park). · Pubmed #11252933 No free full text.

Abstract: Whole-breast external-beam radiation therapy (EBRT) involves a 6-week course of fractionated treatments. In contrast, brachytherapy can be completed in a 4- to 5-day treatment course. Because of this shortened time frame, there has been interest in breast brachytherapy as a sole modality after lumpectomy. The American Brachytherapy Society (ABS) has issued guidelines specifically for the use of brachytherapy in breast carcinoma. In these guidelines, the ABS addresses important areas of controversy related to the indications, execution, and evaluation of breast implants when utilized in the following settings: as the sole treatment modality following lumpectomy, as an alternative to a 6-week course of EBRT following lumpectomy, as a boost following whole-breast irradiation, and for the treatment of local recurrences following breast-conservation treatment. The ABS recommends a precise definition and meticulous delineation of the clinical target volume. In addition, the Society recommends the routine use of dose-volume histograms and a dose-homogeneity index as tools to ensure reproducible brachytherapy and to allow interinstitutional comparisons. Brachytherapy as a sole modality is currently considered investigational and should be performed in the context of a controlled clinical trial. Practitioners and cooperative groups are encouraged to use these guidelines to formulate treatment and dose-reporting policies, but responsibility for medical decisions ultimately rests with the treating radiation oncologist.

Vicini FA, Goldstein NS, Kestin LL. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI, USA. · Ann Oncol. · Pubmed #10509147 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Lumpectomy and radiation therapy is considered a standard treatment option for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) of the breast. The incidence of locally recurrent carcinoma using this therapeutic approach ranges from 6%-19%. Multiple studies have attempted to identify factors associated with the development of local recurrences in these patients. Despite extensive reports examining this issue, no factor(s) has consistently been correlated with outcome. METHODS: This review examines the criteria that various authors have proposed as being associated with recurrence, including DCIS grade, size, histologic subtype, status of surgical margins, and technical factors to help clarify their roles in optimizing treatment outcome. The issue of the definition of the type of recurrence is also addressed. RESULTS: Though multiple studies have examined the impact of grade, histologic subtype, necrosis, and DCIS size on outcome, no consistent results have been observed to suggest that these factors can be routinely used to guide therapy. The adequacy of excision appears to correlate with local control but is imprecisely defined by margin status alone. Based upon recent data, it appears that atypical ductal hyperplasia and cancerization of lobules in the context of coexistent DCIS, may need to be considered as part of the DCIS lesion that should be excised. This issue may account for some of the disparate results of different studies of DCIS. For statistical purposes, recent studies also suggest that only recurrences developing within or adjacent to the bed of the initial DCIS lesion should be considered when analyzing factors associated with outcome. Recurrences developing elsewhere in the breast may include new DCIS and invasive lesions that bear no biologic relationship with the initial DCIS lesion. Finally, since it is impossible to insure that all DCIS has been removed, it may be more appropriate to consider DCIS lesions as adequately or inadequately excised instead of completely or incompletely excised. Since DCIS is essentially a microscopic disease, pathologists should have a primary role in helping to define the adequacy of excision. CONCLUSIONS: Additional studies with complete pathology review and longer follow-up are needed to reach a consensus on which prognostic factors are consistently associated with recurrence for patients with DCIS treated with lumpectomy and radiation therapy. At the present time, adequacy of excision appears to correlate with outcome. However, more precise and consistent methods need to be developed to assist in the determination of adequate DCIS extirpation.

Jeruss JS, Vicini FA, Beitsch PD, Haffty BG, Quiet CA, Zannis VJ, Keleher AJ, Garcia DM, Snider HC, Gittleman MA, Whitacre E, Whitworth PW, Fine RE, Arrambide S, Kuerer HM. · Department of Surgical Oncology, Unit 444, The University of Texas M. D. Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Boulevard, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Ann Surg Oncol. · Pubmed #16788759 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The MammoSite device was designed as a breast brachytherapy applicator and is currently used to deliver accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI). We hypothesized that APBI delivered with the MammoSite device would be well tolerated and be associated with a good cosmetic outcome in patients with ductal carcinoma-in-situ (DCIS). METHODS: From 2002 to 2004, 191 patients with DCIS were enrolled in a registry trial to assess the MammoSite applicator. Fifteen patients were excluded from analysis because of device- or patient-related factors; 7 patients were excluded after receiving a radiotherapy boost, thus leaving 169 patients available for study. Follow-up information was available for 158 patients. The average length of follow-up was 7.35 months. Forty-three patients had at least 1 year of follow-up. RESULTS: Skin spacing for the MammoSite applicator was as follows: < 5 mm, 3 patients (1.78%); 5 to 7 mm, 18 patients (10.65%); and > or = 7 mm, 148 patients (87.57%). Patients with a device-to-skin distance of > or = 7 mm had the best cosmetic result. Patients with a device-to-skin distance of > or = 7 mm also had a lower incidence of radiation dermatitis. Data on 43 patients who were followed up for at least 1 year confirmed these findings. Additional adverse events were primarily related to skin changes, with breast infections occurring in five patients (3.16%). No patient in the study has experienced a recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: APBI delivered via MammoSite is well tolerated in patients with DCIS, and the lowest toxicity was obtained in patients with the greatest device-to-skin distance. Long-term follow-up data regarding patient satisfaction, cosmesis, and efficacy are needed and will be determined from a recently opened large randomized study.

Chen PY, Vicini FA, Benitez P, Kestin LL, Wallace M, Mitchell C, Pettinga J, Martinez AA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan 48073, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #16421922 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to assess the cosmesis and toxicities in patients with early-stage breast carcinoma who received treatment with accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) using interstitial brachytherapy. METHODS: From April 1993 to December 2001, 199 patients with Stage I-II breast carcinoma received breast-conserving therapy with APBI to the tumor bed alone through a low-dose-rate (LDR) or high-dose-rate (HDR) implant. A template guide was used. The LDR dose was 50 Gray (Gy) over 96 hours; the outpatient HDR implant delivered 32 Gy in 8-Gy or 34 Gy in 10-Gy twice-daily fractions. Cosmesis (Harvard criteria) and toxicities (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group guidelines) were assessed at < or = 6 months, 2 years, and 5 years. RESULTS: The median follow up was 6.4 years. Breast pain, edema, erythema, and hyperpigmentation all diminished over time. Breast fibrosis and hypopigmentation increased until the 2-year mark and then stabilized. Fat necrosis and telangiectasia increased over time, with a fat necrosis rate of 11% at 5 years. Nearly all telangiectasias (34% at 5 yrs) were Grade 1 (< 2 mm). The remaining toxicities were Grade 1 at all follow-up intervals. Infections (11%) occurred predominantly within the first month after treatment. Good-to-excellent cosmetic outcomes were noted in 95-99% of patients over time; cosmetic results stabilized at 2 years with excellent results increased out to 5 years. CONCLUSIONS: APBI with interstitial brachytherapy resulted in mild chronic toxicities, the majority of which diminished or reached a plateau over time. Long-term cosmesis was good to excellent in 95-99% of patients and stabilized at 2 years.

Vicini FA, Beitsch PD, Quiet CA, Keleher A, Garcia D, Snider HC, Gittleman MA, Zannis VJ, Kuerer H, Whitacre EB, Whitworth PW, Fine RE, Haffty BG, Arrambide LS. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48072, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #16088962 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Eighty-seven institutions participated in a Registry Trial that was designed to collect data on the clinical use of the MammoSite breast brachytherapy catheter for delivering breast irradiation. Patient demographics, technical reproducibility, cosmesis, and early toxicity were evaluated. METHODS: From May 4, 2002 through July 30, 2004, 1419 patients with Stage 0, I, or II breast carcinoma who were undergoing breast-conserving therapy were enrolled on the trial. The device was placed in 1403 of these patients. The 1237 patients (87% of enrolled patients) who received accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) (34 grays prescribed to 1.0 cm in 10 fractions; 95% of patients who received APBI) constituted the study population; 86% of those patients (1068) had Stages I-II breast carcinoma (median tumor size, 10 mm), and 14% of those patients (169) had Stage 0 breast carcinoma. Ninety-one percent of the patients with invasive carcinoma (977 of 1068 patients) had negative lymph node status, and 99% of all patients had negative margins. The median patient age was 65 years. Systemic chemotherapy alone was administered to 79 patients with invasive carcinoma (7%), hormone therapy was administered to 501 patients (45%), and both were administered to 39 patients (4%). The median follow-up was 5 months. RESULTS: Five hundred fifty-four catheters (45%) were placed with an open cavity at the time of lumpectomy, and 683 catheters (55%) were placed with a closed cavity after lumpectomy. Skin spacing ranged from 2 mm to 75 mm (median, 10 mm). In 89% of patients, there was a minimum balloon-to-skin distance of 7 mm (2% of patients had distances < 5 mm). In terms of cosmetic assessment, 95% of patients (1030 of 1084 patients) who had a cosmetic assessment had a good/excellent result (last follow-up visit). Cosmetic results at 12 months were good/excellent in 92% of 248 evaluable patients. The median skin spacing (> or = 7 mm vs. < 7 mm) was associated significantly with a good/excellent cosmetic result (96.1% vs. 86.8%; P = 0.0001) overall and at 6 months (P = 0.006). Increasing skin spacing was associated with a good/excellent cosmetic result as a continuous variable (P < 0.0001). In total, 92 of 1140 evaluable patients (8.1%) developed an infection in the breast, which was device-related in 5.3% of patients (60 of 1140 patients). Good/excellent cosmetic results were noted in 86% of these patients (last follow-up visit). Fifteen of 442 evaluable patients (3.4%) developed a radiation recall reaction. Good/excellent cosmetic results were noted in 93% of these patients at their last follow-up visit. One local recurrence (0.1%) was reported (new primary carcinoma). CONCLUSIONS: Clinical evaluation of the ability of the MammoSite breast brachytherapy catheter to deliver APBI demonstrated acceptable technical reproducibility between multiple institutions and use in appropriate groups of patients. Cosmetic results at 12 months (92% good/excellent) were comparable to those reported with whole-breast RT. Early toxicity rates (infections, radiation recall) appeared to be acceptable.

Solin LJ, Fourquet A, Vicini FA, Taylor M, Olivotto IA, Haffty B, Strom EA, Pierce LJ, Marks LB, Bartelink H, McNeese MD, Jhingran A, Wai E, Bijker N, Campana F, Hwang WT. · Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104, USA. · Cancer. · Pubmed #15674853 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is detected most commonly on routine screening mammography in the asymptomatic patient, and has a long natural history. The objective of the current study was to determine the long-term outcome after breast-conservation surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation for women with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast. METHODS: In total, 1003 women with unilateral, mammographically detected DCIS of the breast underwent breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation. These women were treated in 10 institutions in North America and Europe. The median follow-up was 8.5 years (mean, 9.0 years; range, 0.2-24.6 years). RESULTS: The 15-year overall survival rate was 89%, and the 15-year cause-specific survival rate was 98%. The 15-year rate of freedom from distant metastases was 97%. In total, there were 100 local failures (10%) in the treated breast. The 15-year rate of any local failure was 19%, and the 15-year rate of local only first failure was 16%. Patient age > or = 50 years at the time of treatment and negative final pathology margins from the primary tumor excision both were associated independently with a lower risk of local failure in univariate analysis (P = 0.00062 and P = 0.024, respectively) and in multivariate analysis (P = 0.00057 and P = 0.0026, respectively). For favorable subgroups of patients age > or = 50 years or with negative resection margins, the 10-year risk of local failure was < or = 8%. CONCLUSIONS: The current results support the use of breast-conserving surgery followed by definitive breast irradiation for the treatment of patients with mammographically detected DCIS of the breast. Patient age > or = 50 years at the time of treatment and negative resection margins both were associated independently with a decreased risk of local failure.

Vicini FA, Remouchamps V, Wallace M, Sharpe M, Fayad J, Tyburski L, Letts N, Kestin L, Edmundson G, Pettinga J, Goldstein NS, Wong J. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, Michigan, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #14630258 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We present our ongoing clinical experience utilizing 3D conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) to deliver partial-breast irradiation (PBI) in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-one patients referred for postoperative radiation therapy after lumpectomy were treated with PBI using our previously reported 3D-CRT technique. Ninety-four percent of patients had surgical clips outlining the lumpectomy cavity (mean: 6 clips). The clinical target volume (CTV) consisted of the lumpectomy cavity plus a 10-mm margin in 9 patients and 15-mm margin in 22 (median: 15 mm). The planning target volume consisted of the CTV plus a 10-mm margin for breathing motion and treatment setup uncertainties. The prescribed dose (PD) was 34 or 38.5 Gy (6 patients and 25 patients, respectively) in 10 fractions b.i.d. separated by 6 h and delivered in 5 consecutive days. Patients were treated in the supine position with 3-5 beams (mean: 4) designed to irradiate the CTV with <10% inhomogeneity and a comparable or lower dose to the heart, lung, and contralateral breast compared with standard whole-breast tangents. The median follow-up duration is 10 months (range: 1-30 months). Four patients have been followed >2 years, 6 >1.5 years, and 5 >1 year. The remaining 16 patients have been followed <12 months. RESULTS: No skin changes greater than Grade 1 erythema were noted during treatment. At the initial 4-8-week follow-up visit, 19 patients (61%) experienced Grade 1 toxicity and 3 patients (10%) Grade 2 toxicity. No Grade 3 toxicities were observed. The remaining 9 patients (29%) had no observable radiation effects. Cosmetic results were rated as good/excellent in all evaluable patients at 6 months (n = 3), 12 months (n = 5), 18 months (n = 6), and in the 4 evaluable patients at >2 years after treatment. The mean coverage of the CTV by the 100% isodose line (IDL) was 98% (range: 54-100%, median: 100%) and by the 95% IDL, 100% (range: 99-100%). The mean coverage of the planning target volume by the 95% IDL was 100% (range: 97-100%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 100% of the PD was 23% (range: 14-39%). The mean percentage of the breast receiving 50% of the PD was 47% (range: 34-60%). CONCLUSIONS: Utilizing 3D-CRT to deliver PBI is technically feasible, and acute toxicity to date has been minimal. Additional follow-up will be needed to assess the long-term effects of these larger fraction sizes on normal-tissue sequelae and the impact of this fractionation schedule on treatment efficacy.

Baglan KL, Sharpe MB, Jaffray D, Frazier RC, Fayad J, Kestin LL, Remouchamps V, Martinez AA, Wong J, Vicini FA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #12527042 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: We present a novel three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) technique to treat the lumpectomy cavity, plus a 1.5-cm margin, in patients with early-stage breast cancer and study its clinical feasibility. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A 3D-CRT technique for partial-breast irradiation was developed using archived CT scans from 7 patients who underwent an active breathing control study. The clinical feasibility of this technique was then assessed in 9 patients who were prospectively enrolled on an Investigational Review Board-approved protocol of partial-breast irradiation. The prescribed dose was 34 Gy in 5 patients and 38.5 Gy in 4 patients, delivered in 10 fractions twice daily over 5 consecutive days. The impact of both breathing motion and patient setup uncertainty on clinical target volume (CTV) coverage was studied, and an appropriate CTV-to-PTV (planning target volume) margin was calculated. RESULTS: By adding a CTV-to-PTV "breathing-only" margin of 5 mm, 98%-100% of the CTV remained covered by the 95% isodose surface at the extremes of normal inhalation and normal exhalation. The "total" CTV-to-PTV margin employed to accommodate organ motion and setup error (10 mm) was found to be sufficient to accommodate the observed uncertainty in the delivery precision. Patient tolerance was excellent, and acute toxicity was minimal. No skin changes were noted during treatment, and at the initial 4-8-week follow-up visit, only mild localized hyperpigmentation and/or erythema was observed. No instances of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis have occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Accelerated partial-breast irradiation using 3D-CRT is technically feasible, and acute toxicity to date has been minimal. A CTV-to-PTV margin of 10 mm seems to provide coverage for most patients. However, more patients and additional studies will be needed to validate the accuracy of this margin, and longer follow-up will be needed to assess acute and chronic toxicity, tumor control, and cosmetic results.

Kestin LL, Jaffray DA, Edmundson GK, Martinez AA, Wong JW, Kini VR, Chen PY, Vicini FA. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48073, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #10656370 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE: We performed a retrospective computed tomography (CT)-based three-dimensional (3D) dose-volume analysis of high-dose-rate (HDR) interstitial breast implants to evaluate the adequacy of lumpectomy cavity coverage, and then designed a simple, reproducible algorithm for dwell-time adjustment to correct for underdosage of the lumpectomy cavity. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Since March 1993, brachytherapy has been used as the sole radiation modality after lumpectomy in selected protocol patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast-conserving therapy. In this protocol, all patients received 32 Gy in 8 fractions of 4 Gy over 4 days. Eleven patients treated with HDR brachytherapy who underwent CT scanning after implant placement were included in this analysis. For each patient, the postimplant CT dataset was transferred to a 3D treatment planning system, and the relevant tissue volumes were outlined on each axial slice. The implant dataset, including the dwell positions and dwell times, were imported into the 3D planning system and then registered to the visible implant template in the CT dataset. The calculated dose distribution was analyzed with respect to defined volumes via dose-volume histograms. Due to the variability of lumpectomy cavity coverage discovered in this 3D quality assurance analysis, dwell times at selected positions were adjusted in an attempt to improve dosimetric coverage of the lumpectomy cavity. Using implant data from 5 cases, a dwell-time adjustment algorithm was designed and was then tested on 11 cases. In this algorithm, a point P was identified using axial CT images, which was representative of the underdosed region within the cavity. The distance (d) from point P to the nearest dwell position was measured. A number of dwell positions (N) nearest to point P were selected for dwell time adjustment. The algorithm was tested by increasing the dwell times of a variable number of positions (N = 1, 3, 5, 7, 10, and 20) by a weighting factor (alpha), where alpha = f(d) and alpha > 1, and subsequently performing 3D dose-volume analysis to evaluate the improvement in lumpectomy cavity coverage. RESULTS: Before adjustment in the 11 implants, the median proportion of the lumpectomy cavity and target volume that received at least the prescription dose was 85% and 68%, respectively. After dwell-time adjustment, lumpectomy cavity coverage was significantly improved in all 11 cases. The median distance from point P to the nearest dwell position (d) was 1.4 cm (range 0.9-1.9). The median volume of the lumpectomy cavity receiving 32 Gy increased from 85.3% in the actual implant to 97.0% (range 74-100%) by increasing the dwell time of a single dwell position by a median factor (alpha) of 12.2 according to the above algorithm. With N = 3, the median proportion of the cavity volume receiving 32 Gy was improved to 97.5% (range 77-100%), with a median alpha of 5.7. Further improvement in lumpectomy cavity coverage was relatively small by increasing additional dwell times. In addition, with N = 20, the median absolute volume of breast tissue receiving 150% of the prescription dose was 70.3 cm3 compared to 26.3 cm3 in the actual implant; whereas with N = 1 or N = 3, this median volume was only 35.9 and 42.0 cm3, respectively. CONCLUSION: Lumpectomy cavity coverage sometimes appears suboptimal with interstitial HDR breast brachytherapy using our current technique. A simple dwell-time increase at only 1-3 dwell positions can compensate for some underdosage without creating significant regions of overdosage. Using simple methodology, a single reference point representing the underdosed region can be utilized for initial selection of the dwell positions to be increased.

Nelson JC, Beitsch PD, Vicini FA, Quiet CA, Garcia D, Snider HC, Gittleman MA, Zannis VJ, Whitworth PW, Fine RE, Keleher AJ, Kuerer HM. · Department of Surgical Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson, Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. · Am J Surg. · Pubmed #19268900 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We present a 4-year update on the efficacy, cosmetic results, and complications of MammoSite breast brachytherapy in patients enrolled in the American Society of Breast Surgeons registry trial. METHODS: A total of 1,449 breasts in 1,440 patients with early stage breast cancer undergoing breast-conserving therapy were treated with adjuvant, accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) (34 Gy in 3.4-Gy fractions) delivered with the MammoSite device. The median follow-up period for the entire group was 36.1 months. RESULTS: The 3-year actuarial rate of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence was 2.15%. The 3-year actuarial rate of axillary recurrence was .36%. Complication rates were as follows: infection, 9.5%; seroma, 26.8% (symptomatic seroma, 12.7%); and fat necrosis, 2.0%. The percentages of breasts with good or excellent cosmetic results were as follows: 12 months, 95%; 24 months, 94%; 36 months, 94%; and 48 months, 91%. CONCLUSIONS: Locoregional control, complications, and cosmetic outcomes from MammoSite APBI at the 4-year update are acceptable and similar to results seen with other forms of APBI.

Haffty BG, Vicini FA, Beitsch P, Quiet C, Keleher A, Garcia D, Snider H, Gittleman M, Zannis V, Kuerer H, Whitacre E, Whitworth P, Fine R, Keisch M. · Department of Radiation Oncology, The Cancer Institute of New Jersey, UMDNJ-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, NJ, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #18692330 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate cosmetic outcome and radiation recall in the American Society of Breast Surgeons registry trial, as a function of the interval between accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) and initiation of chemotherapy (CTX). METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 1440 patients at 97 institutions participated in this trial. After lumpectomy for early-stage breast cancer, patients received APBI (34 Gy in 10 fractions) with MammoSite RTS brachytherapy. A total of 148 patients received CTX within 90 days of APBI. Cosmetic outcome was evaluated at each follow-up visit and dichotomized as excellent/good or fair/poor. RESULTS: Chemotherapy was initiated at a mean of 3.9 weeks after the final MammoSite procedure and was administered </=3 weeks after APBI in 54 patients (36%) and >3 weeks after APBI in 94 patients (64%). The early and delayed groups were well balanced with respect to multiple factors that may impact on cosmetic outcome. There was a superior cosmetic outcome in those receiving chemotherapy >3 weeks after APBI (excellent/good in 72.2% at </=3 weeks vs. excellent/good in 93.8% at >3 weeks; p = 0.01). Radiation recall in those receiving CTX at </=3 weeks was 9 of 50 (18%), compared with 6 of 81(7.4%) in those receiving chemotherapy at >3 weeks (p = 0.09). CONCLUSION: The majority of patients receiving CTX after APBI have excellent/good cosmetic outcomes, with a low rate of radiation recall. Chemotherapy initiated >3 weeks after the final MammoSite procedure seems to be associated with a better cosmetic outcome and lower rate of radiation recall. An excellent/good cosmetic outcome in patients receiving CTX after 3 weeks was similar to the cosmetic outcome of the overall patient population who did not receive CTX.

Vicini FA, Goldstein NS, Wallace M, Kestin L. · Department of Radiation Oncology, William Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak, MI 48072, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #18410995 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To examine the clonality relationships among initial invasive breast carcinoma (IBC), ipsilateral breast failure (IBF), and distant metastasis (DM) to determine the effect of local tumor recurrence on the development of DMs. METHODS AND MATERIALS: A total of 18 patients treated with breast-conserving therapy who developed an IBF followed by DMs were studied using a 20 informative-marker, polymerase chain reaction-based allelic imbalance clonality assay. RESULTS: Four relationships were identified. First, in 7 cases, the IBF and DMs were clonally related to the initial IBC as one progressively genetic unstable process. Second, in 3 cases, the IBF and DMs were each clonally related to the IBC but clonally distinct from each other. Third, in 3 cases, the IBC and the IBF were clonally related and the DMs were clonally related to the IBFs, with a weak relationship to the initial IBC. Finally, in 5 cases, the IBF was clonally distinct from the initial IBC (new second primary) and the DMs were clonally related to the IBF and clonally distinct from the initial IBC. CONCLUSION: These findings provide molecular evidence demonstrating that some DMs can directly develop from IBFs and support the importance of local tumor control in the overall treatment of breast cancer patients.