Breast Neoplasms: Powles T

Reid DM, Doughty J, Eastell R, Heys SD, Howell A, McCloskey EV, Powles T, Selby P, Coleman RE. · Department of Rheumatology, University of Aberdeen, United Kingdom. · Cancer Treat Rev. · Pubmed #18515009 No free full text.

Abstract: In postmenopausal women, the use of aromatase inhibitors increases bone turnover and induces bone loss at sites rich in trabecular bone at an average rate of 1-3% per year leading to an increase in fracture incidence compared to that seen during tamoxifen use. The bone loss is much more marked in young women with treatment-induced ovarian suppression followed by aromatase inhibitor therapy (average 7-8% per annum). Pre-treatment with tamoxifen for 2-5 years may reduce the clinical significance of the adverse bone effects associated with aromatase inhibitors, particularly if this leads to a shortening in the duration of exposure to an aromatase inhibitor. However, skeletal status should still be assessed at the commencement of aromatase inhibitor therapy. The rate of bone loss in women who experience a premature menopause before the age of 45 or are receiving ovarian suppression therapy is accelerated by the concomitant use of aromatase inhibitors. These patients are considered to be at high risk of clinically important bone loss and should have a baseline dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Randomised clinical trials in postmenopausal women indicate that bisphosphonates prevent the bone loss and accelerated bone turnover associated with aromatase inhibitor therapy and are a promising strategy for the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis in this setting. Treatment initiation recommendations are based on a combination of risk factors for osteoporotic fracture and BMD levels. Bisphosphonates, along with a healthy lifestyle and adequate intake of calcium and vitamin D are the treatments of choice to prevent bone loss. Due to the rate of bone loss associated with breast cancer treatments, and uncertainties about the interaction between aromatase inhibitor use and BMD for fracture risk, the threshold for intervention has been set at a higher level than that generally recommended for postmenopausal osteoporosis. Management recommendations have been summarised in two algorithms, one for women experiencing a premature menopause and the other for postmenopausal women requiring adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy.

Powles T, Oliver T, Bower M. · Department of Medical Oncology, St Bartholomew's Hospital, West Smithfield, London. · J HIV Ther. · Pubmed #17580500 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Powles T, McCroskey E, Paterson A. · Parkside Oncology Clinic, London, and University of Sheffield, United Kingdom. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #17062718 links to  free full text

Abstract: Bone is the most common site of metastatic spread from primary operable breast cancer, causing pain, fractures, and hypercalcemia. This spread depends on the release of osteolytic substances by the cancer cells, which activate osteoclasts to cause bone resorption. The osteoclasts also release growth factors that can act back on the cancer cells to activate growth. This vicious circle thereby facilitates the growth of metastases in bone, thus making this a preferential site for relapse. Agents, such as the bisphosphonates, which block osteoclast function, have been shown to reduce the progression of established bone metastases. The oral bisphosphonate clodronate (1,600 mg/d) is effective for treatment of patients with bone metastases. When used as adjuvant therapy, given to patients with operable breast cancer for 2 years, clodronate has been reported to significantly reduce the risk of bone metastases during the 2-year study period [19 clodronate patients versus 35 placebo patients; hazard ratio (HR), 0.546; P=0.03] and 5-year study period (51 clodronate patients versus 73 placebo patients; HR, 0.692; P=0.04) with a significant reduction in mortality (HR, 0.768; P=0.048). This benefit, together with the low toxicity and safety of clodronate, supports its use as additional adjuvant therapy for patients with primary breast cancer. Further, similarly designed trials are under way to establish the optimal duration of therapy, the efficacy in stage I disease, and the relative potential of other bisphosphonates, particularly the more powerful aminobisphosphonates, such as ibandronate and zoledronate.

Martino S, Costantino J, McNabb M, Mershon J, Bryant K, Powles T, Secrest RJ. · The John Wayne Cancer Institute, St. Johns Health Center, Santa Monica, California, USA. · Oncologist. · Pubmed #15047916 links to  free full text

Abstract: The role of estrogen in the development of breast cancer is well recognized, and the use of selective estrogen receptor modulators (SERMs) to reduce breast cancer risk continues to be evaluated. Tamoxifen is the only SERM approved for the reduction of breast cancer incidence in women at high risk. This approval was based on results from the Breast Cancer Prevention Trial. Although initial results from the Royal Marsden Hospital tamoxifen trial and Italian Tamoxifen Prevention Study did not show a similar overall effect of tamoxifen, recent updates from these two trials and initial results from the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study are consistent with a risk reduction effect of tamoxifen for estrogen-receptor-positive breast cancer. Raloxifene, approved for the prevention and treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis, is another SERM being evaluated for breast cancer risk reduction. The recently completed Continuing Outcomes Relevant to Evista trial and the Raloxifene Use for The Heart trial, have breast cancer risk reduction as a primary end point. A third, ongoing trial, the Study of Tamoxifen and Raloxifene trial, is evaluating the relative efficacy and adverse event profile of these two agents in a population at high risk. The study populations of these raloxifene breast cancer prevention trials and the four tamoxifen prevention trials are quite diverse in terms of breast cancer risk. Completion of these trials will provide important information about the occurrence of invasive breast cancer in postmenopausal women and the efficacy of raloxifene for breast cancer risk reduction.

Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, Forbes J, Edwards R, Ashley S, Boyle P. · Cancer Research UK, London, UK. · Lancet. · Pubmed #12559863 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Early findings on the use of tamoxifen or raloxifene as prophylaxis against breast cancer have been mixed; we update available data and overview the combined results. METHODS: All five randomised prevention trials comparing tamoxifen or raloxifene with placebo were included. Relevant data on contralateral breast tumours and side-effects were included from an overview of adjuvant trials of tamoxifen versus control. FINDINGS: The tamoxifen prevention trials showed a 38% (95% CI 28-46; p<0.0001) reduction in breast-cancer incidence. There was no effect for breast cancers negative for oestrogen receptor (ER; hazard ratio 1.22 [0.89-1.67]; p=0.21), but ER-positive cancers were decreased by 48% (36-58; p<0.0001) in the tamoxifen prevention trials. Age had no apparent effect. Rates of endometrial cancer were increased in all tamoxifen prevention trials (consensus relative risk 2.4 [1.5-4.0]; p=0.0005) and the adjuvant trials (relative risk 3.4 [1.8-6.4]; p=0.0002); no increase has been seen so far with raloxifene. Venous thromboembolic events were increased in all tamoxifen studies (relative risk 1.9 [1.4-2.6] in the prevention trials; p<0.0001) and with raloxifene. Overall, there was no effect on non-breast-cancer mortality; the only cause showing a mortality increase was pulmonary embolism (six vs two). INTERPRETATION: The evidence now clearly shows that tamoxifen can reduce the risk of ER-positive breast cancer. New approaches are needed to prevent ER-negative breast cancer and to reduce the side-effects of tamoxifen. Newer agents such as raloxifene and the aromatase inhibitors need to be evaluated. Although tamoxifen cannot yet be recommended as a preventive agent (except possibly in women at very high risk with a low risk of side-effects), continued follow-up of the current trials is essential for identification of a subgroup of high-risk, healthy women for whom the risk-benefit ratio is sufficiently positive.

Cleator S, Tsimelzon A, Ashworth A, Dowsett M, Dexter T, Powles T, Hilsenbeck S, Wong H, Osborne CK, O'Connell P, Chang JC. · Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom. · Breast Cancer Res Treat. · Pubmed #16322899 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (Adriamycin/cytoxan, AC) is a standard chemotherapy regimen for breast cancer, but de novo resistance is frequent. We hypothesized that gene expression profiles predictive of AC response may be different from our previously published patterns with docetaxel. METHODS: Core biopsies from 40 patients were obtained before treatment with AC (6 cycles, 60/600 mg/m2q3 weeks), and clinical responses recorded after treatment. Gene expression patterns were analyzed using Affymetrix U133A chips which comprise approximately 22,200 genes. RESULTS: Clinical complete responses (cCR) were observed in 22, partial responses in 7, stable disease in 11 patients. Differential expression between sensitive cCR and resistant tumors with a low false discovery rate (< 5%) was obtained. Of these 253 differentially expressed genes, pathways up-regulated in sensitive tumors included cell cycle (BUB3, CDKN1B), survival (BCL2, BAG1, BIRC1, STK39), stress response (CYP2B6, MAPK14), and estrogen-related pathways (ER, IRS1). Resistant tumors expressed gene promoting transcription (GTF3C1, ILF3), differentiation (ST14, CTNNBIP1), signal transduction (EIF1AX, EIF4EBP1), and amino acid metabolism (SRM, PLOD1, PLOD3). With leave-one-out cross validation, 67% of the samples were correctly classified, with a permutation p-value of 0.4. The previously published 92-gene molecular portrait for docetaxel sensitivity could not discriminate AC sensitivity and resistance. CONCLUSIONS: This preliminary study supports that molecular profiles for AC response are likely to exist, with unique expression patterns for individual chemotherapy regimens. Larger validation studies are necessary to define and refine patterns for different agents.

Waterston AM, Gumbrell L, Bratt T, Waller S, Gustav-Aspland J, L'hermenier C, Bellenger K, Campbell M, Powles T, Highley M, Bower M, Mouritsen S, Feldmann M, Coombes RC. · Department of Cancer Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Imperial college School of Medicine, London, W12 0HS, UK. · Cancer Immunol Immunother. · Pubmed #15754205 No free full text.

Abstract: We evaluated the safety and immunogencity of a novel vaccine directed against autologous TNFalpha in a Phase I fixed dose escalation trial. The vaccine consisted of two recombinant TNFalpha proteins, with specific peptides replaced by foreign immunodominant T cell epitopes from tetanus toxoid. The main objectives were to establish a safe dose and evaluate the vaccines ability to raise neutralising TNFalpha antibodies. Secondary objectives were improvements in body weight and tumour response. Thirty-three patients were vaccinated with three doses (20, 100, or 400 mug) of TNFalpha vaccine at 2-weekly intervals adjuvanted with aluminium hydroxide. Anti-TNFalpha antibody titres were measured by both a RIA, using soluble native TNFalpha as the antigen, and by an ELISA using immobilized partly denatured TNFalpha. Eleven patients (33%) had mild grade1/2 injection site reactions at the higher doses. In 10 of 20 patients, serum antibodies recognize denatured TNFalpha in the ELISA, whereas, antibody titres against native TNFalpha in the RIA were undetectable. This suggests that the production process had partly denatured the vaccine preventing the formation of cross-reacting antibodies to native TNFalpha. In conclusion, TNFalpha vaccine was able to elicit vaccine specific antibodies. However, since the antibodies were only able to cross-react with partly denatured TNFalpha, evaluation of safety and tumour responses to the TNFalpha vaccine was compromised.

Atula S, Powles T, Paterson A, McCloskey E, Nevalainen J, Kanis J. · Schering Oy, Helsinki 00101, Finland. · Drug Saf. · Pubmed #12814333 No free full text.

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Long-term safety and tolerance is paramount when treating women who are otherwise healthy after the primary adjuvant therapy of breast cancer. Efficacy and limited safety results of a large-scale clinical trial, using adjuvant oral clodronate to prevent bone metastases in primary breast cancer patients, have been reported previously, demonstrating a reduction in the rate of bone metastases during treatment. Here we present expanded safety and tolerability results for clodronate treatment from this trial (cut-off date extended from June 1997 to June 2000). STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: For this randomised, double-blind, placebocontrolled, multicentre study, patients were enrolled and randomised to receive oral clodronate (Bonefos) 1600 mg/day or placebo for 2 years. The total median treatment period plus follow-up was 5.5 years. Adverse events (AEs) and laboratory parameters were followed up regularly for the total study period. The 95% CIs were estimated for the difference in the rate of AEs between the treatment groups. PATIENTS: A total of 1079 women with primary operable breast cancer were enrolled to the study; 538 received clodronate and 541 received placebo. RESULTS: Overall incidence of AEs (96.5% of the patients) was the same in both treatment groups, although gastrointestinal disorders were significantly more frequent in the clodronate group during the total study period (66% vs 56.2%; 95% CI 4.0-15.6; p < 0.05). This was mainly due to an increase in non-severe diarrhoea beginning 3-4 months after treatment start. Serious AEs (SAEs) were reported for 39.4% of the patients receiving clodronate and 44.5% of those receiving placebo; no drug-related (clodronate or placebo) SAEs were identified. Clodronate significantly lowered mortality (98 deaths vs 129 deaths; hazard ratio 0.77; 95% CI 0.59-1.00; p = 0.047) reducing the risk of death over the total study period by 23%. AEs caused 58 early discontinuations (five drug-related events) in the clodronate group and 43 discontinuations (three drug-related events) in the placebo group. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that in women with early breast cancer receiving adjuvant systemic therapy, oral clodronate for 2 years is generally well tolerated with no serious long-term sequelae, providing a safe, long-term therapy in the adjuvant setting.

Cuzick J, Forbes J, Edwards R, Baum M, Cawthorn S, Coates A, Hamed A, Howell A, Powles T, Anonymous00278. · No affiliation provided · Lancet. · Pubmed #12243915 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Three clinical trials on the use of tamoxifen to prevent breast cancer have reported mixed results. The overall evidence supports a reduction in the risk of breast cancer, but whether this benefit outweighs the risks and side-effects associated with tamoxifen is unclear. METHODS: We undertook a double-blind placebo-controlled randomised trial of tamoxifen, 20 mg/day for 5 years, in 7152 women aged 35-70 years, who were at increased risk of breast cancer. The primary outcome measure was the frequency of breast cancer (including ductal carcinoma in situ). Analyses were by intention to treat after exclusion of 13 women found to have breast cancer at baseline mammography. FINDINGS: After median follow-up of 50 months (IQR 32-67), 69 breast cancers had been diagnosed in 3578 women in the tamoxifen group and 101 in 3566 in the placebo group (risk reduction 32% [95% CI 8-50]; p=0.013). Age, degree of risk, and use of hormone-replacement therapy did not affect the reduction. Endometrial cancer was non-significantly increased (11 vs 5; p=0.2) and thromboembolic events were significantly increased with tamoxifen (43 vs 17; odds ratio 2.5 [1.5-4.4], p=0.001), particularly after surgery. There was a significant excess of deaths from all causes in the tamoxifen group (25 vs 11, p=0.028). INTERPRETATION: Prophylactic tamoxifen reduces the risk of breast cancer by about a third. Temporary cessation of tamoxifen should be considered and the use of appropriate antithrombotic measures is recommended during and after major surgery or periods of immobilisation. Prophylactic use of tamoxifen is contraindicated in women at high risk of thromboembolic disease. The combined evidence indicates that mortality from non-breast-cancer causes is not increased by tamoxifen. The overall risk to benefit ratio for the use of tamoxifen in prevention is still unclear, and continued follow-up of the current trials is essential.

Powles T, Paterson S, Kanis JA, McCloskey E, Ashley S, Tidy A, Rosenqvist K, Smith I, Ottestad L, Legault S, Pajunen M, Nevantaus A, Männistö E, Suovuori A, Atula S, Nevalainen J, Pylkkänen L. · Royal Marsden National Health Service Trust, Royal Marsden Hospital, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12149294 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: The development of bone metastases depends on tumor-induced osteoclastic resorption of bone, which may be inhibited by the antiosteolytic bisphosphonate clodronate. Given to patients with primary breast cancer, clodronate might reduce the subsequent incidence of bone metastases. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This double-blind, multicenter trial accrued 1,069 assessable patients with operable breast cancer between 1989 and 1995. All patients received surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tamoxifen as required. Patients were randomized to receive oral clodronate 1,600 mg/d or a placebo for 2 years starting within 6 months of primary treatment. The primary end point was relapse in bone, analyzed on an intent-to-treat basis, during the medication period and during the total follow-up period (median follow-up, 2,007 days). Secondary end points were relapse in other sites, mortality, and toxicity. RESULTS: During the total follow-up period, there was a nonsignificant reduction in occurrence of bone metastases (clodronate, n = 63; placebo, n = 80; hazards ratio [HR], 0.77; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.56 to 1.08; P =.127). During the medication period there was a significant reduction in the occurrence of bone metastases (clodronate, n = 12; placebo, n = 28; HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.22 to 0.86; P =.016). The occurrence of nonosseous metastases was similar (clodronate, n = 112; placebo, n = 128; P =.257), but there was a significant reduction in mortality (clodronate, n = 98; placebo, n = 129; P =.047) during the total follow-up period. CONCLUSION: Clodronate, given to patients with primary operable breast cancer, may reduce the occurrence of bone metastases, although this reduction was only significant during this medication period. There was a significant reduction in mortality.

Kanis JA, McCloskey EV, Powles T, Paterson AH, Ashley S, Spector T. · WHO Collaborating Centre for Metabolic Bone Diseases, University of Sheffield Medical School, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #10098755 No free full text.

Abstract: Because treatment for breast cancer may adversely affect skeletal metabolism, we investigated vertebral fracture risk in women with non-metastatic breast cancer. The prevalence of vertebral fracture was similar in women at the time of first diagnosis to that in an age-matched sample of the general population. The incidence of vertebral fracture, however, was nearly five times greater than normal in women from the time of first diagnosis [odds ratio (OR), 4.7; 95% confidence interval (95% CI), 2.3-9.9], and 20-fold higher in women with soft-tissue metastases without evidence of skeletal metastases (OR, 22.7; 95% CI, 9.1-57.1). We conclude that vertebral fracture risk is markedly increased in women with breast cancer.

Pierga JY, Reis-Filho JS, Cleator SJ, Dexter T, Mackay A, Simpson P, Fenwick K, Iravani M, Salter J, Hills M, Jones C, Ashworth A, Smith IE, Powles T, Dowsett M. · Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Center, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, SW3 6JB, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #17133270 links to  free full text

Abstract: We analysed the molecular genetic profiles of breast cancer samples before and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy with combination doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide (AC). DNA was obtained from microdissected frozen breast core biopsies from 44 patients before chemotherapy. Additional samples were obtained before the second course of chemotherapy (D21) and after the completion of the treatment (surgical specimens) in 17 and 21 patients, respectively. Microarray-based comparative genome hybridisation was performed using a platform containing approximately 5800 bacterial artificial chromosome clones (genome-wide resolution: 0.9 Mb). Analysis of the 44 pretreatment biopsies revealed that losses of 4p, 4q, 5q, 12q13.11-12q13.12, 17p11.2 and 17q11.2; and gains of 1p, 2p, 7q, 9p, 11q, 19p and 19q were significantly associated with oestrogen receptor negativity. 16q21-q22.1 losses were associated with lobular and 8q24 gains with ductal types. Losses of 5q33.3-q4 and 18p11.31 and gains of 6p25.1-p25.2 and Xp11.4 were associated with HER2 amplification. No correlations between DNA copy number changes and clinical response to AC were found. Microarray-based comparative genome hybridisation analysis of matched pretreatment and D21 biopsies failed to identify statistically significant differences, whereas a comparison between matched pretreatment and surgical samples revealed a statistically significant acquired copy number gain on 11p15.2-11p15.5. The modest chemotherapy-driven genomic changes, despite profound loss of cell numbers, suggest that there is little therapeutic selection of resistant non-modal cell lineages.

Padhani AR, Hayes C, Assersohn L, Powles T, Makris A, Suckling J, Leach MO, Husband JE. · Cancer Research UK Clinical Magnetic Resonance Research Group and the Breast Unit, Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Trust, Surrey, England. · Radiology. · Pubmed #16543585 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: To prospectively document changes in contrast agent kinetics in patients with primary breast cancer treated with systemic chemotherapy after one or two cycles and to determine whether kinetic measures can be used to predict final clinicopathologic response. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Institutional committees on clinical research and ethics approval and patient consent were obtained. Dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) examinations were performed in 25 women with primary breast cancer before treatment and after the first (n = 21) and second (n = 15) cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Kinetic parameters (transfer constant, leakage space, and rate constant) were derived for whole tumor regions of interest. Changes in histogram distributions of pixel data (median value and range) and MR imaging-derived size were correlated with final clinical and histologic response by using nonparametric methods. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis of tumor size and transfer constant changes were used to identify patients in whom no benefit was gained from chemotherapy. RESULTS: After the first cycle of treatment, 12 of 14 clinical responders showed decreases in tumor size, and six of seven nonresponders showed increases or no change in tumor size (P < .001). Transfer constant changes did not differ between responders and nonresponders for either clinical or pathologic assessments. After two cycles of treatment, there were tumor size increases in five of six nonresponders compared with decreases in eight of nine responders (P < .001). Reductions in transfer constant range were also observed in responders for both clinical and pathologic assessments (P = .008 and .02, respectively). No other kinetic parameter change predicted response. Size and transfer constant range were equally accurate for predicting the absence of pathologic response after two cycles of treatment (sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve were 100%, 90%, and 0.93, respectively, for size and 100%, 75%, and 0.94, respectively, for transfer constant range). CONCLUSION: Reductions in MR imaging-determined size of the primary tumor best predict clinicopathologic response of breast cancer after one cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Transfer constant and size changes are equally sensitive in the identification of patients who would gain no clinical or pathologic benefit after two cycles of treatment.

Powles T, Paterson A, McCloskey E, Schein P, Scheffler B, Tidy A, Ashley S, Smith I, Ottestad L, Kanis J. · Parkside Oncology, London, UK. · Breast Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16542503 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: Experimental and clinical data show that the oral bisphosphonate clodronate (Bonefos) can inhibit tumor-induced osteoclastic bone resorption. This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter trial was designed to determine if the addition of oral clodronate to standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer could reduce the subsequent occurrence of bone metastases and thereby improve overall survival. METHODS: 1,069 patients with primary operable stage I-III breast cancer were randomized to receive oral clodronate (1,600 mg/day) or placebo for 2 years, in conjunction with standard treatment for primary breast cancer including surgery, radiotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and/or tamoxifen. All patients were assessed for bone metastases at two and five years and additionally when clinically indicated. Survival status was determined as of the close of the study on 30 June 2000 with a median follow up of 5.6 years. The treatment arms were compared using the unstratified log-rank test. Hazard ratios (HRs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated. RESULTS: Oral clodronate significantly reduced the risk of bone metastases in all patients over the 5 year study period (51 patients versus 73 patients with placebo; HR = 0.692, P = 0.043); the difference was also statistically significant over the 2 year medication period (19 patients versus 35 patients with placebo; HR = 0.546, P = 0.031). These differences were most pronounced in patients with stage II/III disease (39 patients versus 64 patients with placebo, HR = 0.592, P = 0.009 over 5 years; 16 patients versus 32 patients with placebo, HR= 0.496, P = 0.020 over 2 years). Survival data also favoured the clodronate arm (HR for all patients = 0.768, P = 0.048; HR for stage II/III disease = 0.743, P = 0.041), although this was not significant due to multiple analyses. Oral clodronate was well tolerated, with mild-to-moderate diarrhoea being the most frequently reported adverse event. CONCLUSION: These results confirm that oral clodronate will significantly improve the 5 year bone relapse free survival when used as a supplementary adjuvant treatment for patients receiving standard treatment for primary operable breast cancer.

Erkkola R, Mattila L, Powles T, Heikkinen J, Toivola B, Korhonen P, Mustonen M. · Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Turku University Central Hospital, Turku, Finland. · Breast Cancer Res Treat. · Pubmed #16172794 No free full text.

Abstract: A double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled pilot study was initiated to evaluate the feasibility of chemoprevention with toremifene 60 mg/day in healthy women at high risk for breast cancer. Enrolment in the study was terminated earlier than planned because of slow patient accrual, although 13% of patients continued for 5 years. The revised efficacy outcomes were change in bone mineral density (BMD) from baseline at four skeletal sites, plus effects on serum lipids. In premenopausal women there was a trend for sustained increase in BMD during toremifene therapy after year 1 in lumbar spine. In postmenopausal women, toremifene had little or no effect on BMD trends. Levels of total and low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol were largely unchanged from baseline in premenopausal women treated with toremifene but were often slightly lower than in the placebo group during follow-up. Total and LDL cholesterol levels declined slightly from baseline in the postmenopausal women and were, at several points during the first 3 years, significantly lower than in the corresponding placebo group (p < 0.01). We conclude that: (a) assessment of toremifene 60 mg/day in chemoprevention will require further clinical trials; (b) toremifene 60 mg/day has no substantive negative effects on BMD in pre- or postmenopausal women and may exert a minor favourable influence (in particular, the effects of toremifene 60 mg/day on BMD in premenopausal women may make the drug an attractive alternative to tamoxifen 20 mg/day for that patient subset); (c) lipid effects of toremifene 60 mg/day are, at minimum, neutral and may be modestly favourable for reducing cardiovascular risk.

Powles T. · Parkside Hospital, Wimbledon, London. · Breast Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15084236 links to  free full text

Abstract: There is evidence that diets which contain high levels of phytoestrogenic isoflavanoids are associated with a low incidence of osteoporosis and menopausal vasomotor symptoms. Plant extracts such as red clover, which contain high levels of isoflavanoids, have been used to reduce menopausal symptoms and have been shown to reduce bone loss in healthy women. A placebo-controlled clinical trial [ISRCTN42940165] of red clover is reported in this issue of Breast Cancer Research and shows that these phytoestrogens do not cause any oestrogenic increase in breast density, which would indicate that they are unlikely to cause an increased risk of breast cancer.

Saso R, Kulkarni S, Mitchell P, Treleaven J, Swansbury GJ, Mehta J, Powles R, Ashley S, Kuan A, Powles T. · Department of Haematology, The Royal Marsden Hospital, Sutton, UK. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #10883674 links to  free full text

Abstract: Of 1774 patients with breast cancer given mitoxantrone (MTZ) with methotrexate (n = 492) or with methotrexate and mitomycin C (n = 1282), nine developed MDS/AML after a median of 2.5 years. Median duration of survival from diagnosis of MDS/AML was 10 months and six patients died. The crude incidence of developing MDS/AML after MMM or MM chemotherapy was 15 per 100,000 patient years follow-up, while the actuarial risk was 1.1% and 1.6% at 5 and 10 years respectively. MTZ-based regimens carry a 10 x higher risk of subsequent MDS/AML compared to that seen in the general population.

Palmieri C, Powles T, Vigushin D. · No affiliation provided · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #11575297 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.