Breast Neoplasms: Pintér T

Tóth-Gombkötö B, Tardos K, Oláh A, Pintér T, Erényi A. · Petz Aladár Megyei Oktatókórház, Sebészeti Osztály. · Magy Seb. · Pubmed #11299541 No free full text.

Abstract: Malignant eccrine poroma is a rare malignoma of the skin. Number of the publicated cases less than a hundred. Authors detected a case of rapid progression malignant eccrine poroma on a young female following a short onset of symptoms. According to the case survey of literature is reported.

Stea B, Shaw E, Pintér T, Hackman J, Craig M, May J, Steffen RP, Suh JH. · Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Arizona Health Sciences Center, Tucson, 85724, USA. · Br J Cancer. · Pubmed #16773073 links to  free full text

Abstract: Efaproxiral (Efaproxyn, RSR13), a synthetic allosteric modifier of haemoglobin (Hb), decreases Hb-oxygen (O(2)) binding affinity and enhances oxygenation of hypoxic tumours during radiation therapy. This analysis evaluated the Phase 3, Radiation Enhancing Allosteric Compound for Hypoxic Brain Metastases; RT-009 (REACH) study efficacy results in relation to efaproxiral exposure (efaproxiral red blood cell concentration (E-RBC) and number of doses). Recursive partitioning analysis Class I or II patients with brain metastases from solid tumours received standard whole-brain radiation therapy (3 Gy/fraction x 10 days), plus supplemental O(2) (4 l/min), either with efaproxiral (75 or 100 mg/kg daily) or without (control). Efaproxiral red blood cell concentrations were linearly extrapolated to all efaproxiral doses received. Three patient populations were analysed: (1) all eligible, (2) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) as primary cancer, and (3) breast cancer primary. Efficacy endpoints were survival and response rate. Brain metastases patients achieving sufficient E-RBC (> or =483 microg/ml) and receiving at least seven of 10 efaproxiral doses were most likely to experience survival and response benefits. Patients with breast cancer primary tumours generally achieved the target efaproxiral exposure and therefore gained greater benefit from efaproxiral treatment than NSCLC patients. This analysis defined the efaproxiral concentration-dependence in survival and response rate improvement, and provided a clearer understanding of efaproxiral dosing requirements.

Boér K, Láng I, Juhos E, Pintér T, Szántó J. · Onkológiai Osztály, Szent Margit Kórház, Budapest, 1032 Hungary. · Magy Onkol. · Pubmed #12975660 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIM: The authors present the Hungarian interim analysis and experience with the BCIRG 001 randomized, multicentric, phase III clinical trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) and FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive breast cancer patients. The results are presented according to international data. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three Hungarian centers - St. Margit Hospital, Budapest, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Petz Aladár Hospital, Gyôr - participated in the international trial. Between June 1997 and June 1999, 61 patients with node positive breast cancer were enrolled in the study after the surgery. Thirty-four patients were randomized to TAC (75/50/500 mg/m2 6x q3wk) and 27 patients were randomized to FAC (500/50/500 mg/m2 6x q3wk) chemotherapy, with prospective stratification by node (1-3, 4+). In the case of patients with ER and/or PR positive tumours 5 years tamoxifen treatment was started. Radiotherapy was performed after the 6th cycle of chemotherapy. RESULTS: 36 months of follow up was performed. In both arms the hematological toxicity was more frequent. The TAC group showed a higher incidence of neutropenia (76%) compared to the FAC (22%), as well as a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (26%), without grade 3-4 infection and there were no cases of septic death. Regarding non-hematological toxicity more grade 3-4 nausea and vomiting was observed in the FAC group. At three years follow up, the international results show statistically significant improvement in disease-free survival (82% vs. 74%, p=0.0011) in favour of TAC, and similar tendency was observed in the case of overall survival (92% vs. 87%, p=0.11). This benefit with TAC was seen regardless of hormone receptor status. Due to the low number of Hungarian patients we cannot declare the same results. CONCLUSIONS: Based on the international analysis TAC was superior to FAC chemotherapy. Additional follow up data will evaluate the role of TAC in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer treatment. The results indicate that TAC has the potential to be incorporated in the new strategies of adjuvant breast cancer treatments.

Szántó J, Pintér T, Szántó J. · Debreceni Egyetem, Orvos- és Egészségtudományi Centrum, Altalános Orvostudományi Kar, Onkológiai Tanszék. · Orv Hetil. · Pubmed #11341166 No free full text.

Abstract: Between June 1996 and March 1998 a multinational multicentric phase III randomised comparative study was made for comparing 1. the effectiveness, 2. the adverse events and 3. the quality of life of two combinations i.e. DD versus DC. 18 patients were treated with DD and 15 patients with DC. Age, tumour stage, visceral involvement, receptor status were well matched in the two groups. Good partial remission was obtained in 10 patients treated with DD whereas only seven remissions were seen in the DC arm. Response duration was similar in the 2 arms. No difference in adverse events was observed.

Chan S, Friedrichs K, Noel D, Pintér T, Van Belle S, Vorobiof D, Duarte R, Gil Gil M, Bodrogi I, Murray E, Yelle L, von Minckwitz G, Korec S, Simmonds P, Buzzi F, González Mancha R, Richardson G, Walpole E, Ronzoni M, Murawsky M, Alakl M, Riva A, Crown J, Anonymous00001. · Department of Clinical Oncology, City Hospital, Nottingham, and CRC Wessex Medical Oncology Unit, Royal South Hants Hospital, Southampton, United Kingdom. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #10561296 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: This phase III study compared docetaxel and doxorubicin in patients with metastatic breast cancer who had received previous alkylating agent-containing chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized to receive an intravenous infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m(2) or doxorubicin 75 mg/m(2) every 3 weeks for a maximum of seven treatment cycles. RESULTS: A total of 326 patients were randomized, 165 to receive doxorubicin and 161 to receive docetaxel. Overall, docetaxel produced a significantly higher rate of objective response than did doxorubicin (47.8% v 33.3%; P =.008). Docetaxel was also significantly more active than doxorubicin in patients with negative prognostic factors, such as visceral metastases (objective response, 46% v 29%) and resistance to prior chemotherapy (47% v 25%). Median time to progression was longer in the docetaxel group (26 weeks v 21 weeks; difference not significant). Median overall survival was similar in the two groups (docetaxel, 15 months; doxorubicin, 14 months). There was one death due to infection in each group, and an additional four deaths due to cardiotoxicity in the doxorubicin group. Although neutropenia was similar in both groups, febrile neutropenia and severe infection occurred more frequently in the doxorubicin group. For severe nonhematologic toxicity, the incidences of cardiac toxicity, nausea, vomiting, and stomatitis were higher among patients receiving doxorubicin, whereas diarrhea, neuropathy, fluid retention, and skin and nail changes were higher among patients receiving docetaxel. CONCLUSION: The observed differences in activity and toxicity profiles provide a basis for therapy choice and confirms the rationale for combination studies in early breast cancer.

Boér K, Láng I, Juhos E, Pintér T, Szántó J. · V. Department of Internal Medicine - Oncology, Szent Margit Hospital, Budapest, H-1032, Hungary. · Pathol Oncol Res. · Pubmed #14530809 links to  free full text

Abstract: The adjuvant chemotherapy of breast cancer changed in the past two decades. Docetaxel containing regimens are highly active in metastatic breast cancer. A logical approach was their incorporation into trials of early breast cancer adjuvant therapy. The authors present the Hungarian interim analysis and experience with the BCIRG 001 randomized, multicentric, phase III clinical trial comparing TAC (docetaxel, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) and FAC (5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide) in the adjuvant treatment of node positive breast cancer patients. The results are presented compared to the international data. Three Hungarian centers - Szt. Margit Hospital, Budapest, National Institute of Oncology, Budapest, Petz Aladár Hospital, Gyôr - participated in the international trial. Between June 1997 and June 1999, 61 patients with node positive breast cancer were enrolled in the study after the surgery. Thirty-four patients were randomized to TAC (75/50/500 mg/m2 6xq3wk) and 27 patients were randomized to FAC (500/50/500 mg/m2 6x q3wk) chemotherapy, with prospective stratification by node (1-3, 4+). Patients with hormone receptor positive tumors received tamoxifen for 5 years after the chemotherapy. Radiotherapy was performed after the 6th cycle of chemotherapy. 33 months of follow up was performed. In both arms the hematological toxicity was more frequent. The TAC group showed a higher incidence of neutropenia (76%) compared to the FAC (22%), as well as a higher incidence of febrile neutropenia (26 % versus none), without grade 3-4 infection and there was no cases of septic death. More grade 3-4 nausea and vomiting was observed in the FAC group. At three years follow up, results indicated improvement in disease-free survival (88% vs. 76%) in favour of TAC, and similar tendency was observed in the case of overall survival (97% vs. 88%). Based on the international data analysis TAC was superior to FAC chemotherapy, the results show statistically significant differences between the two arms. This benefit with TAC was seen regardless of hormone receptor status. Additional follow up data will evaluate the role of TAC in the adjuvant setting of early breast cancer treatment.