Breast Neoplasms: Cobleigh MA

Taylor ME, Haffty BG, Rabinovitch R, Arthur DW, Halberg FE, Strom EA, White JR, Cobleigh MA, Edge SB. · Washington University, Saint Louis, Missouri 63110-1032, USA. · Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. · Pubmed #19251087 No free full text.

Abstract: This summary focuses on the role of postoperative radiation therapy in patients treated with modified radical mastectomy for invasive breast cancer, particularly in patients receiving systemic therapy.

Moore S, Cobleigh MA. · Cancer Expertise, Chicago, IL, USA. · Semin Oncol Nurs. · Pubmed #17303515 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To review the chemotherapy and targeted biologic options for treatment of advanced and metastatic breast cancer. DATA SOURCES: Clinical and research articles and textbook chapters. CONCLUSION: Recent clinical research has led to the use of novel targeted therapies in the management of locally advanced and metastatic breast cancer. Although metastatic breast cancer remains incurable, increases in disease-free and overall survival has been achieved. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Recent advances in the biological targeted therapies against Her2/neu, VEGF, and EGFR are now either approved therapies or are in the final stages of clinical testing. Oncology nurses can help decrease toxicities and maintain better QOL by fully understanding the mechanism of action of the drugs, expected side effects, and anticipated response to the novel regimen.

Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, Wolff AC, Pritchard KI, Ingle JN, Chlebowski RT, Gelber R, Edge SB, Gralow J, Cobleigh MA, Mamounas EP, Goldstein LJ, Whelan TJ, Powles TJ, Bryant J, Perkins C, Perotti J, Braun S, Langer AS, Browman GP, Somerfield MR. · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, D1210, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15545664 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To update the 2003 American Society of Clinical Oncology technology assessment on adjuvant use of aromatase inhibitors. RECOMMENDATIONS: Based on results from multiple large randomized trials, adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer should include an aromatase inhibitor in order to lower the risk of tumor recurrence. Neither the optimal timing nor duration of aromatase inhibitor therapy is established. Aromatase inhibitors are appropriate as initial treatment for women with contraindications to tamoxifen. For all other postmenopausal women, treatment options include 5 years of aromatase inhibitors treatment or sequential therapy consisting of tamoxifen (for either 2 to 3 years or 5 years) followed by aromatase inhibitors for 2 to 3, or 5 years. Patients intolerant of aromatase inhibitors should receive tamoxifen. There are no data on the use of tamoxifen after an aromatase inhibitor in the adjuvant setting. Women with hormone receptor-negative tumors should not receive adjuvant endocrine therapy. The role of other biomarkers such as progesterone receptor and HER2 status in selecting optimal endocrine therapy remains controversial. Aromatase inhibitors are contraindicated in premenopausal women; there are limited data concerning their role in women with treatment-related amenorrhea. The side effect profiles of tamoxifen and aromatase inhibitors differ. The late consequences of aromatase inhibitor therapy, including osteoporosis, are not well characterized. CONCLUSION: The Panel believes that optimal adjuvant hormonal therapy for a postmenopausal woman with receptor-positive breast cancer includes an aromatase inhibitor as initial therapy or after treatment with tamoxifen. Women with breast cancer and their physicians must weigh the risks and benefits of all therapeutic options.

Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, Chlebowski RT, Ingle JN, Edge SB, Mamounas EP, Gralow J, Goldstein LJ, Pritchard KI, Braun S, Cobleigh MA, Langer AS, Perotti J, Powles TJ, Whelan TJ, Browman GP. · Health Services Research Department, American Society of Clinical Oncology, 1900 Duke Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12149306 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To conduct an evidence-based technology assessment to determine whether the routine use of anastrozole or any of the aromatase inhibitors in the adjuvant breast cancer setting is appropriate for broad-based conventional use in clinical practice. POTENTIAL INTERVENTIONS: Anastrozole, letrozole, and exemestane. OUTCOMES: Outcomes of interest include breast cancer incidence, breast cancer-specific survival, overall survival, and net health benefit. EVIDENCE: A comprehensive, formal literature review was conducted for relevant topics and is detailed in the text. Testimony was collected from invited experts and interested parties. The American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO)-prescribed technology assessment procedure was followed. BENEFITS/HARMS: The ASCO panel recognizes that a woman and her physician's decision regarding adjuvant hormonal therapy is complex and will depend on the importance and weight attributed to information regarding both cancer and non-cancer-related risks and benefits. CONCLUSION: The panel was influenced by the compelling, extensive, and long-term data available on tamoxifen. Overall, the panel considers the results of the Arimidex (anastrozole) or Tamoxifen Alone or in Combination (ATAC) trial and the extensive supporting data to be very promising but insufficient to change the standard practice at this time (May 2002). A 5-year course of adjuvant tamoxifen remains the standard therapy for women with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer. The panel recommends that physicians discuss the available information with patients, and, in making a decision, acknowledge that treatment approaches can change over time. Individual health care providers and their patients will need to come to their own conclusions, with careful consideration of all of the available data. (Specific questions addressed by the panel are summarized in Appendix 3.) VALIDATION: The conclusions of the panel were endorsed by the ASCO Health Services Research Committee and the ASCO Board of Directors.

Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ. · University of Miami School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Research Group, Inc, and Columbia Cancer Research Network of Florida, Miami, Fla, USA. · Oncology. · Pubmed #11694786 No free full text.

Abstract: The pivotal phase II and III Herceptin trials proved the efficacy and safety of second- or third-line single-agent Herceptin and first-line Herceptin in combination with chemotherapy, respectively. In the current trial, 114 patients were randomized to one of two dose groups of first-line Herceptin monotherapy: standard dose of 4 mg/ kg initial dose followed by 2 mg/kg intravenous (i.v.) weekly; or high dose of 8 mg/kg initial dose followed by 4 mg/kg i.v. weekly. The regimen was generally well tolerated. A similar incidence of adverse events was demonstrated in the two dose groups with the possible exception of acute infusion-related events such as fever and chills as well as rash and dyspnea, which appear to be more prevalent in the higher dose group. The overall response rate was 26% and response rates were similar between the two dose groups (24% for the standard Herceptin dose group and 28% for the high Herceptin dose group). Subgroup analysis determined a higher response rate in IHC 3+ patients (35%) and FISH-positive patients (41%). When women with stable disease for > or =6 months were included with responders, the clinical benefit rate in IHC 3+ patients was 47%. Median survival was 24.4 months, which is comparable with the survival rate seen in the pivotal phase III combination trial (25 months). Therefore, single-agent Herceptin is an important new option for the first-line treatment of HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer patients.

Vogel C, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ, Anonymous00277. · University of Miami School of Medicine, Miami, FL, USA. · Eur J Cancer. · Pubmed #11167088 No free full text.

Abstract: Following confirmation of the appropriate dosage, safety and potential efficacy of Herceptin(trastuzumab) in small-scale phase I and II trials involving patients with refractory disease, a large trial was conducted in 222 patients with breast cancer who had relapsed after one or two chemotherapy regimens for their metastatic disease. The results showed a positive and durable overall response rate (15% according to a response evaluation committee (REC) assessment) using trastuzumab monotherapy (initial dose 4 mg/kg intravenously (i.v.) followed by 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly). In another recently completed phase II trial, 113 patients were randomised to two dose levels (initial dose of 4 mg/kg i.v. dose followed by 2 mg/kg i.v. weekly, or initial dose of 8 mg/kg followed by 4 mg/kg i.v. weekly) of single-agent trastuzumab as first-line therapy for metastatic disease. The preliminary overall response rate was 23% based on investigator assessment, and tolerability was excellent as in previous trials; efficacy was similar in both dose groups, but the side-effects tended to be more frequent in the higher dose group. The preferred dosage is therefore the same as that currently recommended, i.e. an initial dose of 4 mg/kg i.v. followed by 2 mg/kg weekly i.v. until disease progression.

Cobleigh MA. · Rush-Presbyterian-St. Luke's Medical Center, USA. · Cancer Treat Res. · Pubmed #10948439 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Burstein HJ, Elias AD, Rugo HS, Cobleigh MA, Wolff AC, Eisenberg PD, Lehman M, Adams BJ, Bello CL, DePrimo SE, Baum CM, Miller KD. · Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, 44 Binney St, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #18347007 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Sunitinib is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor that inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR), platelet-derived growth factor receptor, stem cell factor receptor (KIT), and colony-stimulating factor-1 receptor. This phase II, open-label, multicenter study evaluated sunitinib monotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer (MBC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty-four patients previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane received sunitinib 50 mg/d in 6-week cycles (4 weeks on, then 2 weeks off treatment). The primary end point was objective response rate. Plasma samples were obtained for pharmacokinetic and biomarker analysis. RESULTS: Seven patients achieved a partial response (median duration, 19 weeks), giving an overall response rate of 11%. Three additional patients (5%) maintained stable disease for >or= 6 months. Median time to progression and overall survival were 10 and 38 weeks, respectively. Notably, responses occurred in triple negative tumors and HER2-positive, trastuzumab-treated patients. Thirty-three patients (52%) required dose interruption during >or= 1 cycle, and 25 patients required dose reduction (39%). Thirty-six patients (56%) had dose modifications due to adverse events (AEs). Treatment was associated with increases in plasma VEGF and decreases in soluble VEGFRs and KIT. The most common AEs were fatigue, nausea, diarrhea, mucosal inflammation, and anorexia. Most AEs were mild to moderate (grade 1 to 2) in severity and were effectively managed with dose delays or reductions. CONCLUSION: Sunitinib is active in patients with heavily pretreated MBC. Most AEs were of mild-to-moderate severity and manageable with supportive treatment and/or dose modification. Further studies in breast cancer are warranted.

Miller KD, Chap LI, Holmes FA, Cobleigh MA, Marcom PK, Fehrenbacher L, Dickler M, Overmoyer BA, Reimann JD, Sing AP, Langmuir V, Rugo HS. · Indiana University, Indianapolis, IN, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #15681523 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial compared the efficacy and safety of capecitabine with or without bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, in patients with metastatic breast cancer previously treated with an anthracycline and a taxane. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive capecitabine (2,500 mg/m2/d) twice daily on day 1 through 14 every 3 weeks, alone or in combination with bevacizumab (15 mg/kg) on day 1. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS), as determined by an independent review facility. RESULTS: From November 2000 to March 2002, 462 patients were enrolled. Treatment arms were balanced. No significant differences were found in the incidence of diarrhea, hand-foot syndrome, thromboembolic events, or serious bleeding episodes between treatment groups. Of other grade 3 or 4 adverse events, only hypertension requiring treatment (17.9% v 0.5%) was more frequent in patients receiving bevacizumab. Combination therapy significantly increased the response rates (19.8% v 9.1%; P = .001); however, this did not result in a longer PFS (4.86 v 4.17 months; hazard ratio = 0.98). Overall survival (15.1 v 14.5 months) and time to deterioration in quality of life as measured by the Functional Assessment Of Cancer Treatment--Breast were comparable in both treatment groups. CONCLUSION: Bevacizumab was well tolerated in this heavily pretreated patient population. Although the addition of bevacizumab to capecitabine produced a significant increase in response rates, this did not translate into improved PFS or overall survival.

Miller KD, Saphner TJ, Waterhouse DM, Chen TT, Rush-Taylor A, Sparano JA, Wolff AC, Cobleigh MA, Galbraith S, Sledge GW. · Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indiana, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #15041714 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: This pilot trial was performed to evaluate the safety, pharmacokinetics and feasibility of incorporating BMS-275291, a matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor (MMPI), into adjuvant breast cancer therapy. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with stage I (T1c)-IIIA breast cancer were eligible if planned adjuvant therapy consisted of either tamoxifen alone, doxorubicin + cyclophosphamide every 21 days for four cycles (AC), or AC followed by paclitaxel every 21 days for 4 cycles (AC>T). Patients were stratified by planned adjuvant therapy and randomized (2:1 ratio) to BMS-275291 (1200 mg/day) or matched placebo for 1 year. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were recruited from March 2001 to July 2002. Grade >or=2 musculoskeletal toxicity, generally reversible arthralgia, was reported by 36.2% of patients receiving BMS-275291 compared with 16.7% of patients receiving placebo; difference = 19.5% (95% confidence interval: -0.06, 0.44; P = NS). Two patients receiving BMS-275291 developed palpable nodules along tendons. Grade >or=3 rash was reported by 8.5% of patients receiving BMS-275291 compared with 4.2% of patients receiving placebo; difference = 4.3% (95% confidence interval: -0.18, 0.3; P = NS). Overall, 33% of BMS-275291 patients and 21% of placebo patients discontinued treatment due to adverse events. BMS-275291 trough levels tended to decrease over time; 9 of 47 (19%) had >or=50% of trough concentrations > 124 ng/ml (IC(90) for matrix metalloproteinase-9). CONCLUSIONS: The pattern of arthralgia in BMS-275291-treated patients was consistent with matrix metalloproteinase inhibitor toxicity. Although the differential incidence of arthralgia did not reach statistical significance, the trial was terminated. An adjuvant trial in this patient population is not feasible.

Cobleigh MA, Langmuir VK, Sledge GW, Miller KD, Haney L, Novotny WF, Reimann JD, Vassel A. · Rush-Presbyterian-St Lukes Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · Semin Oncol. · Pubmed #14613032 No free full text.

Abstract: Vascular endothelial growth factor promotes angiogenesis, an important mediator of growth and metastasis in human breast cancer. Bevacizumab, a monoclonal antibody to vascular endothelial growth factor, is under investigation as an anti-angiogenic agent. This phase I/II trial evaluated the safety and efficacy of bevacizumab in patients with previously treated metastatic breast cancer. Seventy-five patients were treated with escalating doses of bevacizumab ranging from 3 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg administered intravenously every other week. Tumor response was assessed before the sixth (70 days) and 12th (154 days) doses. Safety was evaluated during every cycle. Eighteen patients were treated at 3 mg/kg, 41 at 10 mg/kg, and 16 at 20 mg/kg. Four patients discontinued study treatment because of an adverse event. Hypertension was reported as an adverse event in 17 patients (22%). The overall response rate was 9.3% (confirmed response rate, 6.7%). The median duration of confirmed response was 5.5 months (range, 2.3 to 13.7 months). At the final tumor assessment on day 154, 12 of 75 patients (16%) had stable disease or an ongoing response. The optimal dose of bevacizumab in this trial was 10 mg/kg every other week and toxicity was acceptable. These data support the initiation of trials in metastatic breast cancer combining bevacizumab with chemotherapy.

Vogel CL, Cobleigh MA, Tripathy D, Gutheil JC, Harris LN, Fehrenbacher L, Slamon DJ, Murphy M, Novotny WF, Burchmore M, Shak S, Stewart SJ, Press M. · University of Miami School of Medicine, Comprehensive Cancer Research Group Inc, and Columbia Cancer Research Network of Florida, Miami, FL, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #11821453 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of first-line, single-agent trastuzumab in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred fourteen women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer were randomized to receive first-line treatment with trastuzumab 4 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 2 mg/kg weekly, or a higher 8 mg/kg loading dose, followed by 4 mg/kg weekly. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 26% (95% confidence interval [CI], 18.2% to 34.4%), with seven complete and 23 partial responses. Response rates in 111 assessable patients with 3+ and 2+ HER2 overexpression by immunohistochemistry (IHC) were 35% (95% CI, 24.4% to 44.7%) and none (95% CI, 0% to 15.5%), respectively. The clinical benefit rates in assessable patients with 3+ and 2+ HER2 overexpression were 48% and 7%, respectively. The response rates in 108 assessable patients with and without HER2 gene amplification by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis were 34% (95% CI, 23.9% to 45.7%) and 7% (95% CI, 0.8% to 22.8%), respectively. Seventeen (57%) of 30 patients with an objective response and 22 (51%) of 43 patients with clinical benefit had not experienced disease progression at follow-up at 12 months or later. The most common treatment-related adverse events were chills (25% of patients), asthenia (23%), fever (22%), pain (18%), and nausea (14%). Cardiac dysfunction occurred in two patients (2%); both had histories of cardiac disease and did not require additional intervention after discontinuation of trastuzumab. There was no clear evidence of a dose-response relationship for response, survival, or adverse events. CONCLUSION: Single-agent trastuzumab is active and well tolerated as first-line treatment of women with metastatic breast cancer with HER2 3+ overexpression by IHC or gene amplification by FISH.

Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Tripathy D, Robert NJ, Scholl S, Fehrenbacher L, Wolter JM, Paton V, Shak S, Lieberman G, Slamon DJ. · Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #10561337 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE: Overexpression of the HER2 protein occurs in 25% to 30% of human breast cancers and leads to a particularly aggressive form of the disease. Efficacy and safety of recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody as a single agent was evaluated in women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Two hundred twenty-two women, with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that had progressed after one or two chemotherapy regimens, were enrolled. Patients received a loading dose of 4 mg/kg intravenously, followed by a 2-mg/kg maintenance dose at weekly intervals. RESULTS: Study patients had advanced metastatic disease and had received extensive prior therapy. A blinded, independent response evaluation committee identified eight complete and 26 partial responses, for an objective response rate of 15% in the intent-to-treat population (95% confidence interval, 11% to 21%). The median duration of response was 9.1 months; the median duration of survival was 13 months. The most common adverse events, which occurred in approximately 40% of patients, were infusion-associated fever and/or chills that usually occurred only during the first infusion, and were of mild to moderate severity. These symptoms were treated successfully with acetaminophen and/or diphenhydramine. The most clinically significant adverse event was cardiac dysfunction, which occurred in 4.7% of patients. Only 1% of patients discontinued the study because of treatment-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: Recombinant humanized anti-HER2 monoclonal antibody, administered as a single agent, produces durable objective responses and is well tolerated by women with HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer that has progressed after chemotherapy for metastatic disease. Side effects that are commonly observed with chemotherapy, such as alopecia, mucositis, and neutropenia, are rarely seen.

Oleske DM, Galvez A, Cobleigh MA, Ganschow P, Ayala LD. · Department of Preventive Medicine, Rush University Medical Center, Chicago 60612, USA. · Breast J. · Pubmed #17214789 No free full text.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy of women with breast cancer as teachers of the importance of breast cancer screening to their first-degree female relatives. The sample was restricted to low-income working age women recruited from four hospitals. The study design was a randomized clinical trial. At each hospital, breast cancer patients (probands) were randomized into one of two study groups: (i) intensive, individual educational training on breast cancer screening or (ii) standard clinic education on breast cancer screening. The probands were instructed to teach at least one of their first-degree female relatives (21+ years of age) about breast cancer screening techniques. Three to six months after the enrollment of the probands, their relatives were contacted by telephone to determine breast cancer screening practices. A total of 79 probands and 96 relatives participated in the study. Relatives in the education group when compared with the control group were: 1.25 times more likely to have clinical breast examination (p = 0.005), 2.83 times more likely to have scheduled a clinical breast examination (p = 0.046), and, 1.36 times more likely to have been told about performing breast self-examination (p = 0.05). Additionally, relatives in the education group were more likely to have received a pamphlet on breast cancer screening (RR = 1.58, p = 0.009) and have discussed the importance of breast cancer screening (RR = 1.33, p = 0.020) from the proband. Special education training did not impact mammography utilization of the relatives. From these findings, a tri-ethnic group of low-income women with breast cancer can be effective teachers of breast cancer screening practices, at least for promoting clinical breast examination and transmitting messaging for performance of breast self-examination if given the adequate training.

Cobleigh MA, Tabesh B, Bitterman P, Baker J, Cronin M, Liu ML, Borchik R, Mosquera JM, Walker MG, Shak S. · Rush University Medical Center, Chicago, Illinois 60612, USA. · Clin Cancer Res. · Pubmed #16361546 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE: This study, along with two others, was done to develop the 21-gene Recurrence Score assay (Oncotype DX) that was validated in a subsequent independent study and is used to aid decision making about chemotherapy in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive, node-negative breast cancer patients. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Patients with >or=10 nodes diagnosed from 1979 to 1999 were identified. RNA was extracted from paraffin blocks, and expression of 203 candidate genes was quantified using reverse transcription-PCR (RT-PCR). RESULTS: Seventy-eight patients were studied. As of August 2002, 77% of patients had distant recurrence or breast cancer death. Univariate Cox analysis of clinical and immunohistochemistry variables indicated that HER2/immunohistochemistry, number of involved nodes, progesterone receptor (PR)/immunohistochemistry (% cells), and ER/immunohistochemistry (% cells) were significantly associated with distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS). Univariate Cox analysis identified 22 genes associated with DRFS. Higher expression correlated with shorter DRFS for the HER2 adaptor GRB7 and the macrophage marker CD68. Higher expression correlated with longer DRFS for tumor protein p53-binding protein 2 (TP53BP2) and the ER axis genes PR and Bcl2. Multivariate methods, including stepwise variable selection and bootstrap resampling of the Cox proportional hazards regression model, identified several genes, including TP53BP2 and Bcl2, as significant predictors of DRFS. CONCLUSION: Tumor gene expression profiles of archival tissues, some more than 20 years old, provide significant information about risk of distant recurrence even among patients with 10 or more nodes.

Mass RD, Press MF, Anderson S, Cobleigh MA, Vogel CL, Dybdal N, Leiberman G, Slamon DJ. · Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, CA 94080, USA. · Clin Breast Cancer. · Pubmed #16137435 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: We evaluated the influence of HER2 gene amplification, as determined by fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), on clinical outcomes (objective response rates, time to disease progression, and overall survival time) in women with metastatic breast cancer treated with trastuzumab in 3 clinical trials. Breast cancer tissue specimens were evaluated using a direct labeled, dual-probe FISH assay. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Specimens with a HER2:CEP17 ratio of > or = 2:0 were considered positive for gene amplification. All specimens had previously demonstrated overexpression of HER2 protein at the 2+ or 3+ level by immunohistochemistry using the Clinical Trials Assay. Response rate, time to disease progression, and survival times were then compared between the FISH-positive and FISH-negative cohorts in each of the 3 clinical trials. RESULTS: Informative FISH results were obtained in 765 (96%) of the 799 patients enrolled in the 3 clinical trials. Overall, 596 (78%) were FISH-positive and 169 (22%) were FISH-negative. The proportion of FISH-positive patients was comparable in all 3 trials. Clinical benefit from trastuzumab therapy appeared to be restricted to patients with FISH-positive metastatic breast cancer. In each clinical trial, the cohort of FISH-positive patients had higher overall response rates and longer durations of survival compared with FISH-negative patients. CONCLUSION: These data indicate that assessment of HER2 amplification by FISH is the preferred method to select patients for trastuzumab therapy.

Oleske DM, Cobleigh MA, Phillips M, Nachman KL. · Department of Health Systems Management, Rush University Medical Center in Chicago, IL, USA. <> · Oncol Nurs Forum. · Pubmed #15547631 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE/OBJECTIVES: To identify factors associated with hospitalization after diagnosis of breast cancer in working-age women. DESIGN: Descriptive, retrospective survey. SETTING: Caseload of a single medical oncologist affiliated with an urban, not-for-profit, academic medical center. SAMPLE: 123 consecutively evaluated women aged 21-65 years with breast cancer associated with projected survival greater than three years. METHODS: Data were collected from an electronic clinical file with demographic, diagnostic, and hormone replacement therapy (HRT) information. Four survey forms were mailed to subjects: (a) a form ascertaining personal demographics, health status, and healthcare utilization, (b) menopausal Symptom Rating Scale, (c) a hot flash diary, and (d) the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale. MAIN RESEARCH VARIABLES: Menopausal symptoms, depression symptoms, age, time since diagnosis, and overnight hospitalization. FINDINGS: An increasing depression score and increasing menopausal symptoms score were found to be independent predictors of hospitalization controlling for age at diagnosis, disease stage, and time since diagnosis. Demographic variables, HRT use at or prior to diagnosis (a proxy measure of health status), current self-reported health status, and hot flashes were not associated with hospitalization. CONCLUSIONS: Psychological factors can be important significant predictors of hospitalization in survivors of breast cancer independent of disease stage. Further study should be undertaken to determine whether support services directed at identifying and treating those at risk for depression or menopausal symptoms may reduce the likelihood of potentially avoidable hospitalization. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING: The identification of those at high risk for hospitalization because of high levels of depressive or menopausal symptoms and prompt intervention offer the opportunity to improve the quality of life of breast cancer survivors and reduce the cost of health care for themselves, their families, and the healthcare system.

Winer EP, Hudis C, Burstein HJ, Bryant J, Chlebowski RT, Ingle JN, Edge SB, Mamounas EP, Gelber R, Gralow J, Goldstein LJ, Pritchard KI, Braun S, Cobleigh MA, Langer AS, Perotti J, Powles TJ, Whelan TJ, Browman GP. · American Society of Clinical Oncology, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA. · J Clin Oncol. · Pubmed #12732612 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Tangney CC, Young JA, Murtaugh MA, Cobleigh MA, Oleske DM. · Department of Clinical Nutrition, Rush Presbyterian St Luke's Medical Center Chicago, IL 60612, USA. · Breast Cancer Res Treat. · Pubmed #11881909 No free full text.

Abstract: Little information is available about the relationship between quality of life of women who have survived breast cancer (specifically, symptoms including those of menopause and depression) and the quality of their diet. In this cross-sectional study, 117 women with known primary breast cancer completed a self-administered food frequency questionnaire (FFQ) reflecting usual diet during the past year, a Survey of Feelings and Attitudes using the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression scale (CES-D) and a survey that includes menopausal symptoms among others common to women with a history of breast cancer. When women's responses to the FFQ were scored using the Healthy Eating Index (HEI), most often diets were evaluated as those that 'need improvement' with a mean total HEI score of 67.2. With regard to the CES-D scores, study women averaged 9.5, with 19 women being classified as clinically depressed. HEI and CES-D scores were inversely related (p = -0.22, p = 0.02). A negative correlation was also observed between energy-adjusted calcium intakes and CES-D scores (p = -0.19, p = 0.04). Clinical depressed women had not only lower HEI scores and calcium intakes, but also lower grain and variety scores. Comparisons to national data for disease-free women and that available for those with breast cancer suggest that our study women consumed diets low in energy and dietary variety. Diet quality may be an important factor influencing the manifestation of depressive symptoms in breast cancer survivors or conversely, poorer diet quality may be an outcome of depression.

Cobleigh MA, Norlock FE, Oleske DM, Starr A. · Section of Medical Oncology, Rush-Presbyterian-St Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, Ill 60612, USA. · JAMA. · Pubmed #10227323 links to  free full text

Abstract: CONTEXT: Prolonged postmenopausal hormone replacement therapy (HRT) is associated with increased incidence of breast cancer and, paradoxically, reduced breast cancer mortality. The biological rationale for this discrepancy has not been explored. OBJECTIVE: To compare the prognostic characteristics of cancers arising in women who have used HRT with those in women who never have used HRT. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study from December 1989 to November 1996. SETTING: Teaching hospital in a large midwestern metropolitan area. PATIENTS: Cohort of 331 postmenopausal women who presented consecutively with 349 invasive breast cancers. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Estrogen receptor (ER) status (ER positive vs ER negative) and S phase (low vs high) for current HRT users vs never users. RESULTS: The frequency of high S-phase fraction among cancers in women who were using HRT was markedly increased compared with that in women who had never used HRT (adjusted odds ratio [OR], 2.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.04-7.66). However, the greater frequency of high S-phase fraction was limited to women with ER-positive cancers (for HRT users vs never users, OR, 5.25; 95% CI, 1.36-20.28; for ER-negative cancers in HRT users vs never users, OR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.20-5.86). CONCLUSIONS: Use of HRT appears to stimulate growth of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer as measured by S-phase fraction. The prognostic significance of high S-phase fraction in current HRT users who have ER-positive tumors is unknown.