| 1 |
Guideline [Argentine consensus on the treatment of bipolar disorders] 2005
Vázquez GH, Strejilevich S, García Bonetto G, Cetkovich-Bakmas M, Zaratiegui R, Lagomarsino A, Goldchluk A, Kalina E, Herbst L, Gutiérrez B, Anonymous00416. · Departamento de Neurociencias, Universidad de Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · Vertex. · Pubmed #16601825 No free full text.
Abstract: The consensus guidelines of argentine experts in the treatment of bipolar disorders are the result of three days of work of the 10 main local experts under the organization of the Argentine Association of Biological Psychiatry (AAPB). It was adopted a mixed criterion for its preparation: all the recent data of the evidence medicine based published until now were discussed and were balanced with the knowledge acquired from clinical experience of the local experts on the bipolar field. It presents general recommendations and suggested therapeutic sequences for the phase of maintenance, the manic/hypomanic or mixed episode and the depressive episode. These have been divided according to the classification in type I and II; with or without rapid cycling. Since the group of experts identified the delay and miss-diagnoses like the most important barrier for a suitable treatment enclosed a series of recommendations for differential diagnosis of bipolar disorders.
|
| 2 |
Article Bipolar disorders and affective temperaments: a national family study testing the "endophenotype" and "subaffective" theses using the TEMPS-A Buenos Aires. 2008
Vázquez GH, Kahn C, Schiavo CE, Goldchluk A, Herbst L, Piccione M, Saidman N, Ruggeri H, Silva A, Leal J, Bonetto GG, Zaratiegui R, Padilla E, Vilapriño JJ, Calvó M, Guerrero G, Strejilevich SA, Cetkovich-Bakmas MG, Akiskal KK, Akiskal HS. · Department of Neuroscience, University of Palermo, Buenos Aires, Argentina. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #18006072 No free full text.
Abstract: BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to examine the prevalence of affective temperaments between clinically unaffected relatives of bipolar patients and secondarily to investigate the impact of these "subaffective" forms on their quality of life (QoL). METHODS: The study was performed in seven sites across Argentina. We administered the scales TEMPS-A and Quality of Life Index to a sample of 114 non-ill first degree relatives of bipolar disorder patients ("cases") and 115 comparison subjects without family history of affective illness ("controls"). We used The Mood Disorder Questionnaire to rule out clinical bipolarity. RESULTS: Mean scores on all TEMPS-A subscales were significantly higher in cases, except for hyperthymia. The prevalence of affective temperaments, according to Argentinean cut-off points, was also higher, with statistical significance for cyclothymic and anxious temperaments. Regarding QoL, we found no significant differences between both groups, except for interpersonal functioning, which was better in controls. A detailed subanalysis showed significant effects of QoL domains for all temperaments, except for the hyperthymic. LIMITATIONS: We used self-report measures. A larger sample size would have provided us greater statistical power for certain analyses. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support the concept of a spectrum of subthreshold affective traits or temperaments - especially for the cyclothymic and anxious - in bipolar pedigrees. We further demonstrated that, except for the hyperthymic, quality of life was affected by these temperaments in "clinically well" relatives. Overall, our data are compatible with the "endophenotype" and "subaffective" theses for affective temperaments.
|
| 3 |
Article [Interactions of mood stabilizers] 2003
Zaratiegui R. · No affiliation provided · Vertex. · Pubmed #12888858 No free full text.
Abstract: This review on the drug-drug interactions of mood stabilizers is aimed to be practical and clinically relevant. Polypharmacy has became the most frequent approach in the treatment of bipolar disorders, and patients given with a long term treatment are expected to suffer occasionally medical intercurrences, which in turn lead to prescriptions of other drugs. Both factors render a possibility of drug-drug interactions rather frequent. Two actual clinical vignettes will be given, illustrating clinical situations in which drug interactions may often occur. It will be reviewed the main drug-drug interactions reported with lithium, carbamazepine, oxcarbazepine, valproate, lamotrigine, gabapentin and topiramate, and also some pharmacokinetic aspects of mood stabilizers that are important in order to understand the possibility of interactions.
|
|
|