Bipolar Disorder: Bowden C

Grunze H, Vieta E, Goodwin GM, Bowden C, Licht RW, Moller HJ, Kasper S. · Institute of Neuroscience, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #19347775 No free full text.

Abstract: These updated guidelines are based on a first edition that was published in 2003, and have been edited and updated with the available scientific evidence until end of 2008. Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of acute mania in adults. The data used for these guidelines have been extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, from the clinical trial database clinicaltrials.gov, from recent proceedings of key conferences, and from various national and international treatment guidelines. Their scientific rigor was categorised into six levels of evidence (A-F). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was finally asigned different grades of recommendation to ensure practicability.

Grunze H, Kasper S, Goodwin G, Bowden C, Möller HJ, Anonymous00338. · Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #15346536 No free full text.

Abstract: As with the two preceding guidelines of this series, these practice guidelines for the pharmacological maintenance treatment of bipolar disorder were developed by an international task force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence relating to maintenance treatment. The data used for these guidelines were extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, from recent proceedings from key conferences and various national and international treatment guidelines. The scientific justification of support for particular treatments was categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was not only graded, but also reviewed by the experts of the task force to ensure practicality.

Grunze H, Kasper S, Goodwin G, Bowden C, Baldwin D, Licht RW, Vieta E, Möller HJ, Anonymous00027. · Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12582971 No free full text.

Abstract: Identical to the preceding guidelines of this series, these practice guidelines for the biological, mainly pharmacological treatment of acute bipolar mania were developed by an international Task Force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of acute mania. The data used for these guidelines have been extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, from recent proceedings of key conferences, and from various national and international treatment guidelines. Their scientific rigor was categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was finally not only graded, but has also been commented by the experts of the task force to ensure practicability. Key words: bipolar disorder, mania, acute treatment, evidence-based guidelines, pharmacotherapy, antipsychotics, mood stabiliser, electroconvulsive therapy.

Grunze H, Kasper S, Goodwin G, Bowden C, Baldwin D, Licht R, Vieta E, Möller HJ, Anonymous00265. · Department of Psychiatry, Ludwig-Maximilians-University, Nussbaumstrasse 7, 80336 Munich, Germany. · World J Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12478876 No free full text.

Abstract: These practice guidelines for the biological, mainly pharmacological treatment of bipolar depression were developed by an international task force of the World Federation of Societies of Biological Psychiatry (WFSBP). Their purpose is to supply a systematic overview of all scientific evidence pertaining to the treatment of bipolar depression. The data used for these guidelines have been extracted from a MEDLINE and EMBASE search, and from recent proceedings of key conferences and various national and international treatment guidelines. Their scientific rigor was categorised into four levels of evidence (A-D). As these guidelines are intended for clinical use, the scientific evidence was not only graded, but also commented on by the experts of the task force to ensure practicability.

Sachs GS, Thase ME, Otto MW, Bauer M, Miklowitz D, Wisniewski SR, Lavori P, Lebowitz B, Rudorfer M, Frank E, Nierenberg AA, Fava M, Bowden C, Ketter T, Marangell L, Calabrese J, Kupfer D, Rosenbaum JF. · Partners Bipolar Treatment Center, Department of Psychiatry, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · Biol Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12788248 No free full text.

Abstract: The Systematic Treatment Enhancement Program for Bipolar Disorder (STEP-BD) was conceived in response to a National Institute of Mental Health initiative seeking a public health intervention model that could generate externally valid answers to treatment effectiveness questions related to bipolar disorder. STEP-BD, like all effectiveness research, faces many design challenges, including how to do the following: recruit a representative sample of patients for studies of readily available treatments; implement a common intervention strategy across diverse settings; determine outcomes for patients in multiple phases of illness; make provisions for testing as yet undetermined new treatments; integrate adjunctive psychosocial interventions; and avoid biases due to subject drop-out and last-observation-carried-forward data analyses. To meet these challenges, STEP-BD uses a hybrid design to collect longitudinal data as patients make transitions between naturalistic studies and randomized clinical trials. Bipolar patients of every subtype with age >/= 15 years are accessioned into a study registry. All patients receive a systematic assessment battery at entry and are treated by a psychiatrist (trained to deliver care and measure outcomes in patients with bipolar disorder) using a series of model practice procedures consistent with expert recommendations. At every follow-up visit, the treating psychiatrist completes a standardized assessment and assigns an operationalized clinical status based on DSM-IV criteria. Patients have independent evaluations at regular intervals throughout the study and remain under the care of the same treating psychiatrist while making transitions between randomized care studies and the standard care treatment pathways. This article reviews the methodology used for the selection and certification of the clinical treatment centers, training study personnel, the general approach to clinical management, and the sequential treatment strategies offered in the STEP-BD standard and randomized care pathways for bipolar depression and relapse prevention.

Bowden C. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, Mail Code 7792, 7703 Floyd Curl Drive, San Antonio, TX 78229-3900, USA. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #15121342 No free full text.

Abstract: Divalproate (VPA) was the first drug, other than lithium, reported to be efficacious for the treatment of bipolar disorder. Since then, the effectiveness of VPA, alone, in combination, and as maintenance therapy, has been investigated in a number of studies. As a monotherapy, clinical studies revealed that VPA was superior to lithium with regard to being effective in a broader patient population: patients with depressive symptoms concurrent with their mania, patients previously poorly responsive to lithium, patients with more lifetime episodes, and on specific symptoms of elation/grandiosity and reduced need for sleep. In addition, while VPA had superior efficacy versus carbamazepine (CBZ), an anti-manic agent, and equivalent efficacy to the anti-psychotic agent olanzapine (OLZ) in manic patients with psychotic manic features, patients showed much better tolerability to VPA than CBZ, anti-psychotics, and, in particular, lithium. Recently, combination therapy (mood stabilizers plus anti-psychotic agents) has shown some advantages compared with monotherapy. Manic symptoms have been observed to improve to a greater extent when the mood stabilizer was co-administered with an anti-psychotic rather than either agent used alone. While only a few maintenance studies have been conducted to date, two randomized studies have indicated consistent trends toward greater efficacy of VPA than lithium, and significant superiority over placebo on most, although not all, measures. In general, VPA provides a well-tolerated treatment that is efficacious for a broad spectrum of manic states and improves outcomes during maintenance treatment.

Tohen M, Vieta E, Calabrese J, Ketter TA, Sachs G, Bowden C, Mitchell PB, Centorrino F, Risser R, Baker RW, Evans AR, Beymer K, Dube S, Tollefson GD, Breier A. · Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, USA. · Arch Gen Psychiatry. · Pubmed #14609883 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Despite the longer duration of the depressive phase in bipolar disorder and the frequent clinical use of antidepressants combined with antipsychotics or mood stabilizers, relatively few controlled studies have examined treatment strategies for bipolar depression. OBJECTIVE: To examine the use of olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination in the treatment of bipolar I depression. DESIGN: Double-blind, 8-week, randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Eighty-four sites (inpatient and outpatient) in 13 countries.Patients A total of 833 randomized adults with bipolar I depression with a Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) score of at least 20.Intervention Patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo (n = 377); olanzapine, 5 to 20 mg/d (n = 370); or olanzapine-fluoxetine combination, 6 and 25, 6 and 50, or 12 and 50 mg/d (n = 86). MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Changes in MADRS total scores using mixed-effects model repeated-measures analyses. RESULTS: During all 8 study weeks, the olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups showed statistically significant improvement in depressive symptoms vs the placebo group (P<.001 for all). The olanzapine-fluoxetine group also showed statistically greater improvement than the olanzapine group at weeks 4 through 8. At week 8, MADRS total scores were lower than at baseline by 11.9, 15.0, and 18.5 points in the placebo, olanzapine, and olanzapine-fluoxetine groups, respectively. Remission criteria were met by 24.5% (87/355) of the placebo group, 32.8% (115/351) of the olanzapine group, and 48.8% (40/82) of the olanzapine-fluoxetine group. Treatment-emergent mania (Young Mania Rating Scale score <15 at baseline and > or =15 subsequently) did not differ among groups (placebo, 6.7% [23/345]; olanzapine, 5.7% [19/335]; and olanzapine-fluoxetine, 6.4% [5/78]). Adverse events for olanzapine-fluoxetine therapy were similar to those for olanzapine therapy but also included higher rates of nausea and diarrhea. CONCLUSIONS: Olanzapine is more effective than placebo, and combined olanzapine-fluoxetine is more effective than olanzapine and placebo in the treatment of bipolar I depression without increased risk of developing manic symptoms.

Wagner KD, Weller EB, Carlson GA, Sachs G, Biederman J, Frazier JA, Wozniak P, Tracy K, Weller RA, Bowden C. · University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, TX 77555-0188, USA. · J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. · Pubmed #12364844 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the safety and effectiveness of divalproex sodium (Depakote ) in the treatment of youths with bipolar disorder. METHOD: Forty bipolar disorder patients aged 7 to 19 years, with a manic, hypomanic, or mixed episode, enrolled in an open-label study of divalproex (2-8 weeks), followed by a double-blind, placebo-controlled period (8 weeks). RESULTS: Twenty-two subjects (61%) showed > or =50% improvement in Mania Rating Scale (MRS) scores during the open-label period. Significant ( <.001) improvements from baseline were seen for mean scores of all efficacy measures, including the MRS, Manic Syndrome Scale, Behavior and Ideation Scale, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale, Clinical Global Impressions Severity scale, and Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression. Of the 23 subjects who discontinued the study during the open-label period, 6 (15%) discontinued for ineffectiveness, 6 (15%) for intolerance, 6 (15%) for noncompliance, and 6 (15%) for other reasons. Adverse events were generally mild or moderate in severity, with the most common being headache, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and somnolence. Laboratory data results were unremarkable. Too few subjects participated in the double-blind period for statistical analysis. CONCLUSION: This study provides preliminary support for the safety and effectiveness of divalproex in the treatment of bipolar disorder in youths.

Bowden C, Singh V. · Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX, USA. · Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. · Pubmed #19412459 links to  free full text

Abstract: Functional recovery, the goal of treatment, has long been overlooked in the assessment of effectiveness of pharmacological treatments. However, with the recent shift in paradigm, from syndromal-symptomatic recovery to functional recovery, there appears to be a new interest in the definition and evaluation of functional recovery. Since functional recovery lags symptomatic recovery, sometimes by months or years, the attainment of functional recovery will be determined by both efficacy and long-term compliance. Quetiapine, due to its efficacy in both mania and depression, and effect on cognition may lead to improved functioning in patients with bipolar disorder.

Severus WE, Kleindienst N, Evoniuk G, Bowden C, Möller HJ, Bohus M, Frangou S, Greil W, Calabrese JR. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Munich, Munich, Germany. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #19019453 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Preliminary evidence suggests that the polarity of relapse/recurrence (depressive vs. hypomanic/manic/mixed) in bipolar patients on lithium might be related to serum lithium levels. METHODS: Polarity of episodes in 64 bipolar-I patients on lithium monotherapy during a prospective 18-month maintenance trial was predicted from (a) intra-individual oscillations of lithium levels over time and from (b) absolute lithium levels preceding relapse/recurrence. RESULTS: On an individual basis, depressive (vs. hypomanic/manic/mixed) episodes were mostly preceded by lithium levels above the individual means (p<0.001). Relapse/recurrence occurring at lithium levels above the overall mean serum level of 0.66 mmol/l was depressive (not hypomanic/manic/mixed) in most cases (odds-ratio=3.86, p=0.032). Lithium levels before depressive episodes were numerically higher than before hypomanic/manic/mixed episodes (0.769+/-0.242 vs. 0.675+/-0.262 mmol/l, p=0.13). Cox-regression including current lithium levels as time-dependent predictor essentially confirmed these results. LIMITATIONS: As patients were not randomized to specific lithium levels, potential confounders could not be completely ruled out. Furthermore, a closer than monthly assessment of both lithium levels and psychopathology would have been desirable to better understand the interplay between lithium levels and new mood episodes. CONCLUSIONS: The results indicate that within the currently accepted therapeutic range (0.4-1.1 mmol/l), the relative risk for depressive vs. hypomanic/manic/mixed relapses/recurrences may be associated with higher lithium levels. Therefore, lithium levels at the lower range of the therapeutic spectrum may be sufficient for the optimal prevention of depressive episodes whereas higher lithium levels within this range may be needed for optimal protection against manic/mixed episodes.

Tohen M, Vieta E, Goodwin GM, Sun B, Amsterdam JD, Banov M, Shekhar A, Aaronson ST, Bardenstein L, Grecu-Gabos I, Tochilov V, Prelipceanu D, Oliff HS, Kryzhanovskaya L, Bowden C. · Lilly Research Laboratories, 450 South Madison Ave., Indianapolis, IN 46225, USA. · J Clin Psychiatry. · Pubmed #19014751 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of olanzapine, divalproex, and placebo in a randomized, double-blind trial in mild to moderate mania (DSM-IV-TR criteria). METHOD: The study was conducted from October 2004 to December 2006. A total of 521 patients from private practices, hospitals, and university clinics were randomly assigned to olanzapine (5-20 mg/day), divalproex (500-2500 mg/day), or placebo for 3 weeks; those completing continued with a 9-week double-blind extension. Efficacy (mean change in Young Mania Rating Scale [YMRS] total score was the primary outcome) and safety were assessed. RESULTS: After 3 weeks of treatment, olanzapine-treated (N = 215) and placebo-treated (N = 105) patients significantly differed in YMRS baseline-to-endpoint total score change (p = .034; least squares [LS] mean: -9.4 and -7.4, respectively). Such changes were not significantly different between olanzapine vs. divalproex (N = 201) or divalproex vs. placebo. After 12 weeks of treatment, olanzapine- and divalproex-treated patients significantly differed in YMRS baseline-to-endpoint changes (p = .004; LS mean: -13.3 and -10.7, respectively). Of observed cases, 35.4% (35/99; 3 weeks) to 57.1% (28/49; 12 weeks) had valproate plasma concentrations lower than the recommended valproate therapeutic range, but these patients' YMRS scores were lower than those of patients with valproate concentrations above/within range. Compared with divalproex, after 12 weeks, olanzapine-treated patients had significant increases in weight (p < .001) and in glucose (p < .001), triglyceride (p = .003), cholesterol (p = .024), uric acid (p = .027), and prolactin (p < .001) levels. Divalproex-treated patients had significant decreases in leukocytes (p = .044) and platelets (p < .001) compared with olanzapine after 12 weeks of treatment. The incidence of potentially clinically significant weight gain (>/= 7% from baseline) was higher with olanzapine than with divalproex (3-week: p = .064, 6.4% vs. 2.7%; 12-week: p = .002, 18.8% vs. 8.5%; respectively).CONCLUSION: Olanzapine was significantly more efficacious than placebo but not divalproex at 3 weeks and significantly more efficacious than divalproex at 12 weeks. Olanzapine-treated patients had significantly greater increases in weight and in glucose, cholesterol, triglyceride, uric acid, and prolactin levels than divalproex-treated patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00094549.

Bowden C, Göğüş A, Grunze H, Häggström L, Rybakowski J, Vieta E. · Department of Psychiatry, University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio, Texas 78229-3900, USA. · Int Clin Psychopharmacol. · Pubmed #18703934 No free full text.

Abstract: On the basis of 3-week studies, lithium and valproate are both recommended for first-line treatment of acute mania. It is, however, also important to demonstrate that antimanic efficacy can be maintained. This study has been designed to compare the efficacy and tolerability of valproate and lithium over 12 weeks in the treatment of acute mania in patients with type I bipolar disorder. Three hundred patients with bipolar I disorder presenting with acute mania were randomized to open treatment with lithium (starting dose: 400 mg/day) or valproate (starting dose: 20 mg/kg/day) for 12 weeks. The primary efficacy criterion was remission (YMRS score <or=12 at study end and a reduction of >or=2 on the CGI-BP severity scale). Remission rates were 65.5% (lithium group) and 72.3% (valproate group). Noninferiority of valproate with respect to lithium was demonstrated [between-group difference: 6.78% (95% confidence intervals: -3.80 to 17.36%)]. Remission rates assessed by the secondary mixed model repeated measures analysis were significantly greater with valproate than with lithium. Adverse events were reported in 44% of patients in both groups. Valproate and lithium showed comparable efficacy and tolerability in the treatment of acute mania over 12 weeks.

Tohen M, Calabrese J, Vieta E, Bowden C, Gonzalez-Pinto A, Lin D, Xu W, Corya S. · Lilly Research Laboratories, Indianapolis, IN 46285, United States. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #17512607 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: This secondary analysis from a randomized double-blind study of acute bipolar depression compared olanzapine monotherapy, olanzapine-fluoxetine combination (OFC) and placebo in patients with or without comorbid anxiety. METHODS: Patients with bipolar disorder and a current depressive episode received olanzapine (5-20 mg/day), OFC (6/25, 6/50, or 12/50 mg/day), or placebo in an 8-week trial. Two populations were defined: comorbid (Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale, HAM-A > or =18) or non-comorbid (HAM-A <18) anxiety. Changes in Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) and HAM-A total scores, and rates of response (> or =50% decrease from baseline to endpoint) and remission (MADRS < or =12 or HAM-A < or =7) were analyzed. RESULTS: Baseline MADRS and YMRS scores were significantly higher in patients with comorbid anxiety relative to those without. Patients without comorbid anxiety were more likely to achieve MADRS response and remission than those with comorbid anxiety (relative risk, RR: 1.21 and 1.29, respectively). Patients with comorbid anxiety had greater rates of response and remission with olanzapine and OFC relative to placebo (response RR:1.45 and 2.14; remission RR:1.96 and 2.32, respectively). Response and remission rates on the HAM-A scale were greater for OFC relative to placebo (RR: 2.00 and 3.20). Weight gain was greater for olanzapine (2.59+/-3.24 kg) and OFC (2.79+/-3.23 kg) relative to placebo, as were baseline to endpoint changes in cholesterol levels (6+/-31 and 10+/-67 mg/dL, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Comorbid anxiety symptoms in patients with bipolar depression have a negative impact on treatment outcome. Olanzapine and, to a greater extent, olanzapine-fluoxetine combination were effective in reducing both depressive and anxiety symptoms in these patients. The significantly greater changes in weight, glucose and cholesterol parameters observed in the olanzapine and olanzapine-fluoxetine combination groups should be entered into the risk-benefit assessment in determining appropriate treatment options for these patients.

Sachs G, Bowden C, Calabrese JR, Ketter T, Thompson T, White R, Bentley B. · Department of Psychiatry, Harvard University, Harvard Bipolar Research Program, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA 02114, USA. · Bipolar Disord. · Pubmed #16542188 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The effect of lamotrigine maintenance therapy on body weight was assessed retrospectively in analyses of data from two double-blind, placebo- and lithium-controlled, 18-month studies in patients with bipolar I disorder (n = 227 for lamotrigine, 190 for placebo, 166 for lithium). METHODS: Endpoints included mean change in weight, the percentage of patients with > or = 7% change (increase, decrease, fluctuation) in weight, and the percentage of patients with weight-related adverse events during double-blind treatment. RESULTS: Mean weight remained stable during maintenance therapy with lamotrigine. In a mixed-model repeated-measures analysis, mean changes in weight (kg) at week 52 were -1.2 with lamotrigine, +0.2 with placebo, and +2.2 with lithium [estimated difference (95% CI) lamotrigine minus placebo = -1.3 (-3.6, 0.9), p = 0.237; lithium minus placebo = +2.0 (-0.3, 4.4), p = 0.094; lithium minus lamotrigine = +3.4 (1.4, 5.4), p < 0.001]. Analyses were truncated at week 52 because of the high incidence of missing data at later time points. The percentages of patients with a >/=7% weight gain, during randomized treatment, were 10.9%, 7.6% and 11.8% for the lamotrigine, placebo, and lithium groups, respectively. The percentages of patients with a > or = 7% weight loss, during randomized treatment, were 12.1%, 11.5%, and 5.1% for the lamotrigine, placebo, and lithium groups, respectively. The percentage of patients with a > or = 7% weight loss did not significantly differ between lamotrigine and placebo but was significantly higher with lamotrigine than lithium. The incidences of > or = 7% weight changes and of weight changes reported as adverse events were comparable between active treatments and placebo. CONCLUSION: Lamotrigine was associated with stable body weight during 1 year of treatment and was comparable to placebo in mean weight change, incidence of clinically significant weight change, and incidence of weight changes reported as adverse events in patients with bipolar disorder. Lithium was associated with weight gain, but the magnitude of lithium-associated weight gain was lower in the current analysis than in previous studies.

Caetano SC, Olvera RL, Hunter K, Hatch JP, Najt P, Bowden C, Pliszka S, Soares JC. · Department of Psychiatry, The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, San Antonio, TX 78229, USA. · J Affect Disord. · Pubmed #16445989 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Psychosis in pediatric mood disorder patients may be related to suicidal ideation. Bipolar (BP) adolescents are at high risk of completed suicide. We examined whether pediatric BP patients with psychosis have a higher prevalence of suicidality than non-psychotic BP patients. Based on previous findings in adult BP patients, we predicted that pediatric BP patients with psychotic symptoms would have higher prevalence of suicidality, higher occurrence of lifetime psychiatric hospitalizations and worse current Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) scores compared to non-psychotic BP patients. METHODS: We studied 43 BP children and adolescents (mean age +/- S.D = 11.2 +/- 2.8 y, range = 8-17) who did (n = 17) or did not have (n = 26) a lifetime history of psychotic symptoms. Indicators of suicidality (thoughts of death and suicidal ideation, plans, and attempts), psychiatric diagnoses, psychotic symptoms, psychiatric hospitalizations and GAF scores were assessed with the K-SADS-PL interview. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size, cross-sectional study and exclusion of substance abuse comorbidity. RESULTS: Pediatric BP patients with a lifetime history of psychotic symptoms compared to BP patients without psychosis were more likely to have thoughts of death (100% versus 69.2%, p = 0.01), suicidal ideation (94.1% versus 42.3%, p = 0.001) and suicidal plans (64.7% versus 15.4%, p = 0.002). Occurrence of psychiatric hospitalization was higher in psychotic BP patients compared to non-psychotic BP patients (82.4% versus 46.2%, p = 0.018). CONCLUSIONS: Psychotic symptoms in pediatric BP patients are associated with suicidal ideation and plans, and psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychotic symptoms are a risk factor for suicidality amongst pediatric BP patients.

Bearden CE, Glahn DC, Monkul ES, Barrett J, Najt P, Kaur S, Sanches M, Villarreal V, Bowden C, Soares JC. · Department of Psychiatry & Biobehavioral Sciences, University of California Los Angeles, 300 Building Medical Plaza, Suite 2265, Los Angeles, CA 90095, USA. · J Psychiatr Res. · Pubmed #16199055 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: There is mounting evidence that declarative memory processes are impaired in patients with bipolar disorder. However, predictors of the observed impairment are not well understood. This study seeks to: (i) better characterize the nature of declarative memory impairment in bipolar disorder, and (ii) determine the relationship between clinical variables and memory function in bipolar disorder. METHODS: 49 adult patients with bipolar disorder in varying mood states and 38 demographically matched healthy participants completed a comprehensive neurocognitive battery assessing general cognitive functioning, processing speed, and declarative memory. The California verbal learning test was used to characterize learning and memory functions. RESULTS: Although patients with bipolar disorder utilized a similar semantic clustering strategy to healthy controls, they recalled and recognized significantly fewer words than controls, suggesting impaired encoding of verbal information. In contrast, lack of rapid forgetting suggests relative absence of a storage deficit in bipolar patients. While severity of mood symptomatology and illness duration were not associated with task performance, gender and family history significantly affected memory function. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that declarative memory impairments in bipolar patients: (1) are consistent with deficits in learning, but do not appear to be related to different organizational strategies during learning, and (2) do not appear to be secondary to clinical state, but rather may be associated with the underlying pathophysiology of the illness.

Najt P, Glahn D, Bearden CE, Hatch JP, Monkul ES, Kaur S, Villarreal V, Bowden C, Soares JC. · South Texas Veterans Health Care System, Audie L. Murphy Division, San Antonio, TX, USA. · Neurosci Lett. · Pubmed #15823428 No free full text.

Abstract: Although attentional deficits measured by Continuous Performance Tests (CPTs) have been observed in patients with bipolar disorder, their relationship with clinical state is not well understood. The identical pairs Continuous Performance Test (CPT-IP) shows particular promise as a measure sensitive to trait abnormalities in attentional function. In this study, the CPT-IP was administered to 27 patients with bipolar disorder (22 type I, 5 type II) and 25 demographically matched healthy comparison subjects, in order to assess the presence and nature of attentional deficits as a function of mood symptoms. Results showed significantly impaired CPT performance in bipolar patients compared with healthy subjects. Patients made fewer hits (p < 0.01), were slower to respond (p < 0.007), and had poorer discrimination (p < 0.05) and bias (p < 0.006) than comparison subjects. Severity of mania and depression was not correlated with any of the CPT measures. Our findings suggest that attentional dysfunction may be a trait deficit associated with bipolar illness. However, within-subjects longitudinal studies examining fluctuations in performance over time are needed.

Bowden C, Fawcett J. · No affiliation provided · JAMA. · Pubmed #14982904 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.