Back Pain: Bonaiuti D

  Topic:  
Hints · Remembered Topics    
  Start Here  Overview  World Articles  Find Experts  Books & DVDs  Help 
 
Column View Map 2 Articles   Help
A digest of articles written 1999 and later, on the topic "Back Pain," originating from Planet Earth —» Bonaiuti D.  Display:  All Citations ·  All Abstracts
1 Guideline Diagnostic therapeutic flow-charts for low back pain patients: the Italian clinical guidelines. free! 2006

Negrini S, Giovannoni S, Minozzi S, Barneschi G, Bonaiuti D, Bussotti A, D'Arienzo M, Di Lorenzo N, Mannoni A, Mattioli S, Modena V, Padua L, Serafini F, Violante FS. · ISICO (Italian Scientific Spine Institute), Milan, Don Carlo Gnocchi Foundation, ONLUS, IRCCS, Milan, Italy. · Eura Medicophys. · Pubmed #16767064 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

2 Article Manual autotraction: preliminary study on the effectiveness of a new device for back pain treatment. free! 2004

Bonaiuti D, Gatti R, Raschi A, Cantarelli L, Sirtori V. · Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Department, San Gerardo Hospital, Milan, Italy. · Eura Medicophys. · Pubmed #16046930 links to  free full text

Abstract: AIM: The aim of this study is to assess the efficacy of a new, simple and cheap device of manual autotraction (MAT), in comparison with Natchev's autotraction system. METHODS: Fifty-four patients, with lumbalgia or sciatalgia for more than 4 months and disc herniation or protrusion at computed tomography (CT) or nuclear magnetic resonance (NRM), have been selected, at random, in a randomized control trial. Patients have been treated by MAT or by Natchev's autotraction. Treatments' efficacy has been assessed through the differences in visual analogic scale (VAS) for pain, and Backill scale for disability, before and after therapy (diffVAS and diffBi). The results of the 2 autotraction's devices have been compared in order to distinguish their differences. The results have been considered significant if p<0.05. RESULTS: Both treatments proved to be effective (MAT: diffVAS p<0.0001, diffBackill p<0.001; Natchev's group: diffVAS p<0.0001, diffBackill p<0.001). No significant difference of efficacy emerges between the treatments in diffVAS (p=0.199) and diffBi (p=0.906), and a greater efficacy of both in case of pain with nocturnal aggravation (MAT group: diffVAS: p=0.001; Natchev's group: p=0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show an equal efficacy of MAT compared to the known Natchev's system, so it could be equally proposed like a simple conservative treatment in disc protrusion or herniation without surgery indication.