Back Pain: Atlas SJ

Chou R, Loeser JD, Owens DK, Rosenquist RW, Atlas SJ, Baisden J, Carragee EJ, Grabois M, Murphy DR, Resnick DK, Stanos SP, Shaffer WO, Wall EM, Anonymous00055. · Department of Medicine, Oregon Evidence-based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #19363457 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Clinical practice guideline. OBJECTIVE: To develop evidence-based recommendations on use of interventional diagnostic tests and therapies, surgeries, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation for low back pain of any duration, with or without leg pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Management of patients with persistent and disabling low back pain remains a clinical challenge. A number of interventional diagnostic tests and therapies and surgery are available and their use is increasing, but in some cases their utility remains uncertain or controversial. Interdisciplinary rehabilitation has also been proposed as a potentially effective noninvasive intervention for persistent and disabling low back pain. METHODS: A multidisciplinary panel was convened by the American Pain Society. Its recommendations were based on a systematic review that focused on evidence from randomized controlled trials. Recommendations were graded using methods adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation Working Group. RESULTS: Investigators reviewed 3348 abstracts. A total of 161 randomized trials were deemed relevant to the recommendations in this guideline. The panel developed a total of 8 recommendations. CONCLUSION: Recommendations on use of interventional diagnostic tests and therapies, surgery, and interdisciplinary rehabilitation are presented. Due to important trade-offs between potential benefits, harms, costs, and burdens of alternative therapies, shared decision-making is an important component of a number of the recommendations.

Atlas SJ, Nardin RA. · General Medicine Division, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 50 Staniford Street, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · Muscle Nerve. · Pubmed #12635113 No free full text.

Abstract: Low back pain is a common reason for patient visits to a health care provider. For most patients, low back symptoms are nonspecific, meaning that the pain is localized to the back or buttocks and is due to a presumed musculoligamentous process. For patients with radicular leg symptoms, a precise etiology is more commonly identified. The history and physical examination usually provide clues to the uncommon but potentially serious causes of low back pain, as well as to those patients at risk for prolonged recovery. Diagnostic testing should not be a routine part of the initial evaluation, but used selectively based upon the history, examination, and initial treatment response. For patients without significant neurological impairment, initial treatments should include activity modification, nonnarcotic analgesics, and education. For patients whose symptoms are not improving over 2 to 4 weeks, referral for physical treatments is appropriate. A variety of therapeutic options of limited or unproven benefit are available for patients with radicular leg symptoms or chronic low back pain. Patients with radicular pain and little or no neurological findings should receive conservative treatment, but elective surgery is appropriate for those with nerve root compression who are unresponsive to conservative therapy.

Atlas SJ, Deyo RA. · General Medicine Division and the Medical Practices Evaluation Center, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA. · J Gen Intern Med. · Pubmed #11251764 links to  free full text

Abstract: Acute low back pain is a common reason for patient calls or visits to a primary care clinician. Despite a large differential diagnosis, the precise etiology is rarely identified, although musculoligamentous processes are usually suspected. For most patients, back symptoms are nonspecific, meaning that there is no evidence for radicular symptoms or underlying systemic disease. Because episodes of acute, nonspecific low back pain are usually self-limited, many patients treat themselves without contacting their primary care clinician. When patients do call or schedule a visit, evaluation and management by primary care clinicians is appropriate. The history and physical examination usually provide clues to the rare but potentially serious causes of low back pain, as well as to identify patients at risk for prolonged recovery. Diagnostic testing, including plain x-rays, is often unnecessary during the initial evaluation. For patients with acute, nonspecific low back pain, the primary emphasis of treatment should be conservative care, time, reassurance, and education. Current recommendations focus on activity as tolerated (though not active exercise while pain is severe) and minimal if any bed rest. Referral for physical treatments is most appropriate for patients whose symptoms are not improving over 2 to 4 weeks. Specialty referral should be considered for patients with a progressive neurologic deficit, failure of conservative therapy, or an uncertain or serious diagnosis. The prognosis for most patients is good, although recurrence is common. Thus, educating patients about the natural history of acute low back pain and how to prevent future episodes can help ensure reasonable expectations.

Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Robson D, Deyo RA, Singer DE. · Medical Practices Evaluation Center and the General Medicine Division, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #10749631 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons and neurosurgeons throughout Maine. OBJECTIVE: To assess 4-year outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis has increased dramatically despite the lack of randomized trials comparing surgical with nonsurgical treatments. Long-term evaluation of surgical series has documented deterioration in initial symptomatic improvement, but few studies have compared long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatment. METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients had baseline interviews with mailed follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months, then annually thereafter. Clinical data were obtained at baseline from a physician questionnaire. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, and satisfaction. RESULTS: Of 148 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis initially enrolled, 4-year outcomes were available on 119 patients (80.4%): 67 of 81 (83%) treated surgically and 52 of 67 (78%) treated nonsurgically. The surgically treated patients had more severe symptoms and worse functional status at baseline and better outcomes at 4-year evaluation than the nonsurgically treated patients. After 4 years, 70% of the surgically treated and 52% of the nonsurgically treated patients reported that their predominant symptom, either leg or back pain, was better (P = 0.05). Satisfaction of patients with their current state at 4 years was reported by 63% of the surgically treated and 42% of the nonsurgically treated patients (P = 0.04). Surgical treatment remained a significant determinant of 4-year satisfaction, even after adjustment for other independent predictors (P = 0.001). For the nonsurgically treated patients, there was no significant change in outcomes over 4 years, whereas the initial improvement seen in the surgically treated patients modestly decreased over the subsequent 4 years. CONCLUSIONS: For the patients with severe lumbar spinal stenosis, surgical treatment was associated with greater improvement in patient-reported outcomes than nonsurgical treatment at 4-year evaluation, even after adjustment for differences in baseline characteristics among treatment groups. The relative benefit of surgery declined over time but remained superior to nonsurgical treatment. Outcomes for the nonsurgically treated patients improved modestly and remained stable over 4 years. Determining whether outcomes continue to converge will require longer-term evaluation.

Chou R, Atlas SJ, Stanos SP, Rosenquist RW. · Department of Medicine, Oregon Evidence-Based Practice Center, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #19363456 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Systematic review. OBJECTIVE: To systematically assess benefits and harms of nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back and radicular pain. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although use of certain interventional therapies is common or increasing, there is also uncertainty or controversy about their efficacy. METHODS: Electronic database searches on Ovid MEDLINE and the Cochrane databases were conducted through July 2008 to identify randomized controlled trials and systematic reviews of local injections, botulinum toxin injection, prolotherapy, epidural steroid injection, facet joint injection, therapeutic medial branch block, sacroiliac joint injection, intradiscal steroid injection, chemonucleolysis, radiofrequency denervation, intradiscal electrothermal therapy, percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation, Coblation nucleoplasty, and spinal cord stimulation. All relevant studies were methodologically assessed by 2 independent reviewers using criteria developed by the Cochrane Back Review Group (for trials) and by Oxman (for systematic reviews). A qualitative synthesis of results was performed using methods adapted from the US Preventive Services Task Force. RESULTS: For sciatica or prolapsed lumbar disc with radiculopathy, we found good evidence that chemonucleolysis is moderately superior to placebo injection but inferior to surgery, and fair evidence that epidural steroid injection is moderately effective for short-term (but not long-term) symptom relief. We found fair evidence that spinal cord stimulation is moderately effective for failed back surgery syndrome with persistent radiculopathy, though device-related complications are common. We found good or fair evidence that prolotherapy, facet joint injection, intradiscal steroid injection, and percutaneous intradiscal radiofrequency thermocoagulation are not effective. Insufficient evidence exists to reliably evaluate other interventional therapies. CONCLUSION: Few nonsurgical interventional therapies for low back pain have been shown to be effective in randomized, placebo-controlled trials.

Wasiak R, Pransky GS, Atlas SJ. · Center for Disability Research, Liberty Mutual Research Institute for Safety, Hopkinton, MA 01748, USA. · J Eval Clin Pract. · Pubmed #18373572 No free full text.

Abstract: RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES: Low back pain (LBP) is a common condition with frequent health care visits and work disability. Quality improvement efforts in primary care focused on guidelines adherence, provider selection and education, and feedback on appropriateness of care. Such efforts can only succeed if a health care provider is in charge of care over a substantial period. This study was conducted to provide insights about actual patterns of provider involvement in LBP care and implications for quality evaluation. METHODS: Established primary care patients with occupational LBP and health care covered by a workers' compensation insurer were selected. Primary care physician (PCP) involvement was examined relative to overall health care utilization. Four methods of classifying PCP involvement were used to assess the association between PCP involvement and health care and work disability outcomes over a 2-year follow-up period. RESULTS: Primary care physician was rarely the sole provider during episodes of occupational LBP. PCP was the initial non-emergency room provider in 55% of cases, and was the most prevalent provider during at least one episode of care in 45% of cases. Different methods of classification led to different conclusions about the association between PCP involvement and work disability or number of health care visits. Multiple providers were involved throughout the clinical course of the small number of cases that accounted for most of the health care visits and work disability; in these cases, the role of PCP in care was difficult to determine. CONCLUSIONS: Administrative data alone are adequate for provider comparisons only in relatively simple cases. Provider comparisons based on initial treating provider likely overstate the importance of early care, particularly in more complex cases. For LBP, quality improvement models based on PCP-directed interventions or reinforcing guideline adherence may not impact outcomes. A patient-centred model may be necessary to achieve outcome improvements.

Mishra BK, Wu T, Belfer I, Hodgkinson CA, Cohen LG, Kiselycznyk C, Kingman A, Keller RB, Yuan Q, Goldman D, Atlas SJ, Max MB. · Clinical Pain Research Section, Laboratory of Sensory Biology, National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, National Institutes of Health, DHHS, Bethesda, MD, USA. · Mol Pain. · Pubmed #17655760 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Because excessive reduction in activities after back injury may impair recovery, it is important to understand and address the factors contributing to the variability in motor responses to pain. The current dominant theory is the "fear-avoidance model", in which the some patients' heightened fears of further injury cause them to avoid movement. We propose that in addition to psychological factors, neurochemical variants in the circuits controlling movement and their modification by pain may contribute to this variability. A systematic search of the motor research literature and genetic databases yielded a prioritized list of polymorphic motor control candidate genes. We demonstrate an analytic method that we applied to 14 of these genes in 290 patients with acute sciatica, whose reduction in movement was estimated by items from the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. RESULTS: We genotyped a total of 121 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 14 of these genes, which code for the dopamine D2 receptor, GTP cyclohydrolase I, glycine receptor alpha1 subunit, GABA-A receptor alpha2 subunit, GABA-A receptor beta1 subunit, alpha-adrenergic 1C, 2A, and 2C receptors, serotonin 1A and 2A receptors, cannabinoid CB-1 receptor, M1 muscarinic receptor, and the tyrosine hydroxylase, and tachykinin precursor-1 molecules. No SNP showed a significant association with the movement score after a Bonferroni correction for the 14 genes tested. Haplotype analysis of one of the blocks in the GABA-A receptor beta1 subunit showed that a haplotype of 11% frequency was associated with less limitation of movement at a nominal significance level value (p = 0.0025) almost strong enough to correct for testing 22 haplotype blocks. CONCLUSION: If confirmed, the current results may suggest that a common haplotype in the GABA-A beta1 subunit acts like an "endogenous muscle relaxant" in an individual with subacute sciatica. Similar methods might be applied a larger set of genes in animal models and human laboratory and clinical studies to understand the causes and prevention of pain-related reduction in movement.

Tegeder I, Costigan M, Griffin RS, Abele A, Belfer I, Schmidt H, Ehnert C, Nejim J, Marian C, Scholz J, Wu T, Allchorne A, Diatchenko L, Binshtok AM, Goldman D, Adolph J, Sama S, Atlas SJ, Carlezon WA, Parsegian A, Lötsch J, Fillingim RB, Maixner W, Geisslinger G, Max MB, Woolf CJ. · Neural Plasticity Research Group, Department of Anesthesia and Critical Care, Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, 149 13th Street, Room 4309, Charlestown, Massachusetts 02129, USA. · Nat Med. · Pubmed #17057711 No free full text.

Abstract: We report that GTP cyclohydrolase (GCH1), the rate-limiting enzyme for tetrahydrobiopterin (BH4) synthesis, is a key modulator of peripheral neuropathic and inflammatory pain. BH4 is an essential cofactor for catecholamine, serotonin and nitric oxide production. After axonal injury, concentrations of BH4 rose in primary sensory neurons, owing to upregulation of GCH1. After peripheral inflammation, BH4 also increased in dorsal root ganglia (DRGs), owing to enhanced GCH1 enzyme activity. Inhibiting this de novo BH4 synthesis in rats attenuated neuropathic and inflammatory pain and prevented nerve injury-evoked excess nitric oxide production in the DRG, whereas administering BH4 intrathecally exacerbated pain. In humans, a haplotype of the GCH1 gene (population frequency 15.4%) was significantly associated with less pain following diskectomy for persistent radicular low back pain. Healthy individuals homozygous for this haplotype exhibited reduced experimental pain sensitivity, and forskolin-stimulated immortalized leukocytes from haplotype carriers upregulated GCH1 less than did controls. BH4 is therefore an intrinsic regulator of pain sensitivity and chronicity, and the GTP cyclohydrolase haplotype is a marker for these traits.

Chang Y, Singer DE, Wu YA, Keller RB, Atlas SJ. · General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02114, USA. · J Am Geriatr Soc. · Pubmed #15877553 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess the relative effect of initial surgical and nonsurgical treatment on longitudinal outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis over a 10-year follow-up period. DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study. SETTING: Enrollment from community-based specialist practices throughout Maine. PARTICIPANTS: One hundred forty-four patients with lumbar spinal stenosis who had at least one follow-up: 77 initially treated surgically and 67 initially treated nonsurgically. INTERVENTION: Initial surgical or nonsurgical treatment. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical data were obtained at baseline and outcomes followed at regular intervals over 10 years with mailed questionnaires including patient-reported symptoms of back pain, leg symptoms, back-specific functional status, and satisfaction. Longitudinal data were analyzed using general linear mixed models. In addition to treatment (initial surgical or nonsurgical care), time period, and the interaction between treatment and time, the models included baseline score, patient age and sex, and a time-varying general health status score. The effects of these covariates in explaining differences between treatment groups were also examined. The effect of subsequent surgical procedures was assessed using different analysis strategies. RESULTS: The 10-year rate of subsequent surgical procedures was 23% and 38% for patients initially treated surgically and nonsurgically, respectively, and the overall 10-year survival rate was 69%. Patients undergoing initial surgical treatment had worse baseline symptoms and functional status than those initially treated nonsurgically. For all outcomes and at each time point, surgically treated patients reported greater improvement in symptoms and functional status and higher satisfaction scores, indicative of better outcomes, than nonsurgically treated patients. However, the relative magnitude of the benefit diminished over time such that the relative differences for low back pain and satisfaction were no longer significant over long-term follow-up (both P=.08 for treatment effect between 5 and 10 years after controlling for covariates). Regardless of initial treatment received, patients undergoing subsequent surgical procedures reported less improvement in outcomes over time than patients who did not undergo subsequent procedures, but the relative differences between treatment groups were similar in analyses that controlled for outcomes after subsequent procedures. CONCLUSION: After controlling for covariates, patients initially treated surgically demonstrated better outcomes on all measures than those initially treated nonsurgically. Although outcomes of initial surgical treatment remained superior over time, the relative benefit of surgery diminished in later years, especially for low back pain and satisfaction. Patients undergoing subsequent surgery had worse outcomes regardless of initial treatment received, but excluding them did not change overall treatment group comparisons. The analytical methods described may be helpful in the design and analysis of future studies comparing treatment outcomes for patients with lumbar spinal stenosis.

Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. · General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #15834339 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A prospective observational cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess long-term outcomes of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The relative benefit of various treatments for lumbar spinal stenosis is uncertain. Surgical treatment has been associated with short-term improvement, but recurrence of symptoms has been documented. Few studies have compared long-term outcomes of surgical and nonsurgical treatments. METHODS: Patients recruited from the practices of orthopaedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and occupational medicine physicians throughout Maine had baseline interviews with follow-up questionnaires mailed at regular intervals over 10 years. Clinical data were obtained at baseline from a physician questionnaire. Most patients initially undergoing surgery had a laminectomy without fusion performed. Outcomes including patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, and satisfaction were assessed at 8- to 10-year follow-up. Primary analyses were based on initial treatment received with secondary analyses examining actual treatment received by 10 years. RESULTS: Of 148 eligible consenting patients initially enrolled, 105 were alive after 10 years (67.7% survival rate). Among surviving patients, long-term follow-up between 8 and 10 years was available for 97 of 123 (79%) patients (including 11 patients who died before the 10-year follow-up but completed a 8 or 9 year survey); 56 of 63 (89%) initially treated surgically and 41 of 60 (68%) initially treated nonsurgically. Patients undergoing surgery had worse baseline symptoms and functional status than those initially treated nonsurgically. Outcomes at 1 and 4 years favored initial surgical treatment. After 8 to 10 years, a similar percentage of surgical and nonsurgical patients reported that their low back pain was improved(53% vs. 50%, P = 0.8), their predominant symptom (either back or leg pain) was improved (54% vs. 42%, P = 0.3), and they were satisfied with their current status (55% vs. 49%, P = 0.5). These treatment group findings persisted after adjustment for other determinants of outcome in multivariate models. However, patients initially treated surgically reported less severe leg pain symptoms and greater improvement in back-specific functional status after 8 to 10 years than nonsurgically treated patients. By 10 years, 23% of surgical patients had undergone at least one additional lumbar spine operation, and 39% of nonsurgical patients had at least one lumbar spine operation. Patients undergoing subsequent surgical procedures had worse outcomes than those continuing with their initial treatment. Outcomes according to actual treatment received at 10 years did not differ because individuals undergoing additional surgical procedures had worse outcomes than those continuing with their initial treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with lumbar spinal stenosis completing 8- to 10-year follow-up, low back pain relief, predominant symptom improvement, and satisfaction with the current state were similar in patients initially treated surgically or nonsurgically. However, leg pain relief and greater back-related functional status continued to favor those initially receiving surgical treatment. These results support a shared decision-making approach among physicians and patients when considering treatment options for lumbar spinal stenosis.

Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Wu YA, Deyo RA, Singer DE. · General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #15834338 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess 10-year outcomes of patients with sciatica resulting from a lumbar disc herniation treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is little information comparing long-term outcomes of surgical and conservative therapy of lumbar disc herniation in contemporary clinical practice. Prior studies suggest that these outcomes are similar. METHODS: Patients recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and occupational medicine physicians throughout Maine had baseline interviews with follow-up questionnaires mailed at regular intervals over 10 years. Clinical data were obtained at baseline from a physician questionnaire. Primary analyses were based on initial treatment received, either surgical or nonsurgical. Secondary analyses examined actual treatments received by 10 years. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, satisfaction, and work and disability compensation status. RESULTS: Of 507 eligible consenting patients initially enrolled, 10-year outcomes were available for 400 of 477 (84%) surviving patients; 217 of 255 (85%) treated surgically, and 183 of 222 (82%) treated nonsurgically. Patients undergoing surgery had worse baseline symptoms and functional status than those initially treated nonsurgically. By 10 years, 25% of surgical patients had undergone at least one additional lumbar spine operation, and 25% of nonsurgical patients had at least one lumbar spine operation. At 10-year follow-up, 69% of patients initially treated surgically reported improvement in their predominant symptom (back or leg pain) versus 61% of those initially treated nonsurgically (P = 0.2). A larger proportion of surgical patients reported that their low back and leg pain were much better or completely gone (56% vs. 40%, P = 0.006) and were more satisfied with their current status (71% vs. 56%, P = 0.002). Treatment group differences persisted after adjustment for other determinants of outcome in multivariate models. Change in the modified Roland back-specific functional status scale favored surgical treatment, and the relative benefit persisted over the follow-up period. Despite these differences, work and disability status at 10 years were comparable among those treated surgically or nonsurgically. CONCLUSIONS: Surgically treated patients with a herniated lumbar disc had more complete relief of leg pain and improved function and satisfaction compared with nonsurgically treated patients over 10 years. Nevertheless, improvement in the patient's predominant symptom and work and disability outcomes were similar regardless of treatment received. For patients in whom elective discectomy is a treatment option, an individualized treatment plan requires patients and their physicians to integrate clinical findings with patient preferences based on their symptoms and goals.

Atlas SJ, Wasiak R, van den Ancker M, Webster B, Pransky G. · General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, MA General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #15105679 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective case series of primary care patients receiving Workers' Compensation (WC) for back pain. OBJECTIVE: To describe the extent of primary care provider (PCP) involvement in work-related low back pain (WRLBP), and whether PCP involvement is a significant determinant of patterns of care or outcomes. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: In general, WRLBP has inferior outcomes compared with nonoccupational LBP. Although it has been suggested that better outcomes are achieved when care for WRLBP involves specialists such as occupational medicine physicians rather than a PCP, limited evidence supports this claim. METHODS: Adult patients were identified by electronic records from four hospital-affiliated PCP practices in fiscal years 1996 to 1998. Those with a WRLBP claim filed during the same time period were identified by searching a WC claims database. Medical records were reviewed to assess past medical history, the extent of prior PCP contacts for any visits before and for visits 2 years after the reported onset of the WRLBP claim, and detailed information on visits for this condition. Disability outcomes (total costs and days of work disability) were obtained from the WC database. RESULTS: Among 68,710 individuals with a PCP practice visit, 118 with a WRLBP claim were identified. The final study sample included 87 patients with a WRLBP claim and at least 1 documented PCP practice visit during the study period. Seventy-eight percent of patients saw the PCP at least once in the 2 years after the claim onset date, but only 34 patients (39%) visited the PCP for their WRLBP, and 20 (23%) had more than 1 visit. Although almost all patients with a PCP visit for WRLBP saw a physician (not the PCP in 79% of cases) within a week of the claim onset date, the median number of days between the onset date and the first WRLBP visit to the PCP was 47.5. Patients with a prior history of back problems were more likely to have a PCP visit for WRLBP (odds ratio 2.9, 95% confidence interval 1.1-7.7). Patients with PCP visits for WRLBP had higher total and medical costs than those without PCP visits, but a similar number of paid disability days. After controlling for other potential predictors, involvement of the PCP was not a significant predictor of the total cost of the WRLBP claim. CONCLUSIONS: Many individuals with a WC claim do not have a stable PCP relationship around the onset of their WRLBP episode. Those with PCP relationships uncommonly involve the PCP in their WRLBP, and if they do, it is usually later in the course because of persistent or recurrent symptoms. Disability outcomes appear to be similar regardless of whether a PCP was involved. However, PCP involvement is associated with greater medical costs, which may reflect confounding based on duration of symptoms rather than the nature of the care provided. Additional research is needed to understand how different patterns of care for patients with a WRLBP claim relate to outcomes and how these patients compare with individuals without such a claim, as well as the factors that lead patients to involve their PCP or not.

Atlas SJ, Deyo RA, van den Ancker M, Singer DE, Keller RB, Patrick DL. · General Medicine Division and the Clinical Epidemiology Unit, Medical Services, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #12923478 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: Analysis of health-related quality of life data obtained from a prospective cohort study of patients with sciatica due to an intervertebral disc herniation or lumbar spinal stenosis. OBJECTIVE: To derive and validate a shortened version of a previously validated 23-item modification of the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: For patients with low back pain, improving health-related quality of life is often the main goal of therapy. The Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire is one of the best validated and most frequently used back-specific functional status measures. A shortened version may permit more widespread use in clinical and research settings. METHODS: Data from 507 patients with sciatica enrolled in the Maine Lumbar Spine Study were used to derive a shortened version of a 23-item modification of the original Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire using qualitative and cluster analysis techniques. The internal consistency, construct validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness in detecting change over a 3-month period for a new 12-item scale was compared to the original 23-item scale. The 12-item scale was then validated in an independent cohort of 148 patients with lumbar spinal stenosis. RESULTS: Internal consistency was very good but modestly lower for the 12-item instrument compared to the 23-item original scale. Reproducibility over a 3-month interval was good and did not differ between the 12-item and original scale. Findings from the validation cohort were similar or better than the derivation cohort. A high degree of construct validity with patient-reported symptoms was demonstrated for the 12-item and original scales. The responsiveness and interpretability of the 12-item scale over 3 months was excellent and comparable to the original scale. Responsiveness assessed in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis in the independent validation cohort showed consistent findings compared to patients with a disc herniation in the derivation cohort. CONCLUSIONS: This short, simple, self-administered 12-item back-specific functional status questionnaire performed extremely well in comparison with the original 23-item scale. If validated in additional study populations, this new questionnaire may be useful in the clinical setting as a way for providers to prospectively compare their outcomes of care to other patient populations, and to study treatment effectiveness.

Atlas SJ, Keller RB, Chang Y, Deyo RA, Singer DE. · General Medicine Division and the Medical Practices Evaluation Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02114, USA. · Spine (Phila Pa 1976). · Pubmed #11413434 No free full text.

Abstract: STUDY DESIGN: A prospective cohort study. OBJECTIVE: To assess 5-year outcomes for patients with sciatica caused by a lumbar disc herniation treated surgically or nonsurgically. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: There is limited knowledge about long-term treatment outcomes of sciatica caused by a lumbar disc herniation, particularly the relative benefits of surgical and conservative therapy in contemporary clinical practice. METHODS: Eligible, consenting patients recruited from the practices of orthopedic surgeons, neurosurgeons, and occupational medicine physicians throughout Maine had baseline interviews with mailed follow-up questionnaires at 3, 6, and 12 months and annually thereafter. Clinical data were obtained at baseline from a physician questionnaire. Outcomes included patient-reported symptoms of leg and back pain, functional status, satisfaction, and employment and compensation status. RESULTS: Of 507 patients initially enrolled, 5-year outcomes were available for 402 (79.3%) patients: 220 (80%) treated surgically and 182 (78.4%) treated nonsurgically. Surgically treated patients had worse baseline symptoms and functional status than those initially treated nonsurgically. By 5 years 19% of surgical patients had undergone at least one additional lumbar spine operation, and 16% of nonsurgical patients had opted for at least one lumbar spine operation. Overall, patients treated initially with surgery reported better outcomes. At the 5-year follow-up, 70% of patients initially treated surgically reported improvement in their predominant symptom (back or leg pain) versus 56% of those initially treated nonsurgically (P < 0.001). Similarly, a larger proportion of surgical patients reported satisfaction with their current status (63% vs. 46%, P < 0.001). These differences persisted after adjustment for other determinants of outcome. The relative advantage of surgery was greatest early in follow-up and narrowed over 5 years. There was no difference in the proportion of patients receiving disability compensation at the 5-year follow-up. The least symptomatic patients at baseline did well regardless of initial treatment, although function improved more in the surgical group. CONCLUSIONS: For patients with moderate or severe sciatica, surgical treatment was associated with greater improvement than nonsurgical treatment at 5 years. However, patients treated surgically were as likely to be receiving disability compensation, and the relative benefit of surgery decreased over time.