Replacement Arthroplasty: Lustig S

Lustig S, Bruderer J, Servien E, Neyret P. · No affiliation provided · Knee. · Pubmed #19138856 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Lustig S, Servien E, Biedert R, Neyret P. · Centre Albert Trillat, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Grande Rue de la Croix-Rousse 103, F-69317 Lyon, France. · Orthopade. · Pubmed #18719888 No free full text.

Abstract: In the majority of cases, arthrosis of the patellofemoral joint (PFJ) is combined with arthrosis of the femorotibial compartment and thus assumes a somewhat secondary role. Nevertheless, it can occur as an isolated entity. Several radiological studies evidenced isolated degenerative alterations in the PFJ in the age group >55 years (13.6-24.0% in women and 11.0-15.4% in men). In younger patients the incidence is lower and is mainly associated with patellar instability or post-traumatic arthrosis. Just the same, the choice of appropriate treatment for these patients is challenging. Total replacement can be recommended for older and less active patients. In contrast, for younger and more active patients, various conservative treatment options and more demanding operative techniques are available to the surgeon to avoid arthroplasty. This article describes the different therapeutic possibilities for managing arthrosis of the PFJ in patients aged <50 years.

Lustig S, Paillot JL, Servien E, Henry J, Ait Si Selmi T, Neyret P. · Knee Surgery Department, centre Livet, Albert Trillat Center, North Hospitals Group, 8, rue de Margnolles, 69300 Caluire, France. · Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. · Pubmed #19251232 No free full text.

Abstract: Unicompartimental knee arthroplasty outcome is sometimes compared to total knee arthroplasty but various implant parameters might greatly influence this outcome. The objectives of this study were to report the results of a consecutive series of 172 all-polyethylene unicompartmental knee arthroplasties (UKAs) and to detail possible factors of success and failure. HYPOTHESIS: It is possible to outline implant and technique factors determining success or failure in unicompartimental knee arthroplasty. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred seventy-two HLS-type cemented resurfacing UKAs, with the femoral implant made of chrome-cobalt and the tibial implant tibial entirely in polyethylene (without anchorage studs) were consecutively implanted between 1988 and 2004 in 134 patients (111 females and 23 males) in our center according to the indications established in 1988, using the same technique for each surgery. The patients' mean age was 72.2 years (range, 25-90 years). The review rate was 83.7% (144 UKAs), with a mean follow-up of 62.3 months (range, 24-160 months). The series included 84 medial UKAs and 60 lateral UKAs. The clinical data were analyzed using the IKS criteria and the patients had a complete radiological evaluation before surgery and at the last follow-up. RESULTS: The rate of satisfied or very satisfied patients was 97.2%. No pain or slight pain was found in 81% of the cases. The mean flexion was 133 degrees (range, 85-150 degrees). The mean knee score varied from 63.6 before surgery to 91.5 (90.4 for medial UKAs and 92.9 for lateral UKAs) and the function score from 63.6 to 83.8 (84.7 for medial UKAs and 82.6 for lateral UKAs). The mean range of motion was 133 degrees (range, 85-150 degrees), better than the medial UKAs for osteonecrosis. The mean residual deformity was 4 degrees varus for the medial UKAs and 2 degrees valgus for the lateral UKAs. A radiolucency was found in 23% of the cases (20% tibial and 3% femoral), nonprogressive in all cases. In 87.2% of the cases, the opposite femorotibial compartment remained radiologically normal. No progression to osteoarthritis in the femoropatellar joint required additional surgery. Sixteen patients required revision surgery: in six cases, the implant was removed and a total prosthesis implanted (one late infection, one case of involvement of the opposite compartment, and four cases of tibial component loosening). In the other cases, one tibial baseplate was changed, five arthroscopies were done, and four unicompartmental knee replacements were done on the opposite compartment. The Kaplan-Meier survival rate (taking into account the revisions with implant change) was 95.6. The results of this series were very satisfactory and were similar to recent series in the world literature that showed survival rates between 90 and 98% at 10 years, rates that are equivalent to those found for total knee replacements. The mean flexion range of motion found was higher than the majority of other recent series, probably because of the precise patient selection in the present study, a minimally invasive approach, and the femoral implant design with an ascending condylar posterior cut. The deterioration of the contralateral compartment is frequently reported, but was perhaps prevented by the absence of overcorrection and patient selection. In this series, none of the UKAs was revised for wear. We explain this by the systematic preservation of a moderate undercorrection, particularly for medial UKAs, the quality of the polyethylene, and a selection based on patient weight and age. CONCLUSIONS: The option of an all-polyethylene tibial implant, with minimal bone cuts (femoral resurfacing), makes excellent long-term results possible.

Hannaoui S, Lustig S, Servien E, Aït Si Selmi T, Neyret P. · Al-Hayat hospital, Shayah, Liban. · Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. · Pubmed #18984125 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Knee pain can be a problem after unicompartmental arthroplasty, compromising the long-term outcome. Arthroscopy may be useful to treat some of the causes such as cement extrusion, fibrous interposition between prosthetic elements, meniscal regeneration, hypertrophic synovitis, or arthroscopic degeneration. We evaluated the results of these procedures. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Seven patients, mean age of 75 years (range 70-79), underwent knee arthroscopy. These patients were among a series of 214 unicompartmental knee prostheses implanted from 1988 to 2005. Arthroscopy was undertaken because of persistent pain after prosthesis implantation. Repeated physical examinations, X-rays and laboratory work-ups were negative for infection or mechanical anomaly. Medical treatment was attempted. The delay before recourse to arthroscopy was 16.3 months (range 9-36 months). The series was composed of five women and two men. RESULTS: Arthroscopy after unicompartmental prosthesis enabled the discovery of chondral, meniscal, and synovial lesions which had not been diagnosed with the usual imaging and laboratory tests. Meniscal regeneration, neomeniscus, and fibrous interpositions were observed. Biopsies were obtained. The arthroscopic procedures performed were: regularization of degenerative contralateral menisci, resection of neomenisci, and synovectomy. Arthroscopic treatment by washout shaving of the cartilage lesions and regularization of the meniscal lesions provided good results. Outcome was scored excellent or good in five knees, and insufficient in two due to progressive degeneration. For one of these two knees, the non-prosthesis femorotibial compartment progressed to overt degeneration. The IKS knee score improved 13 points in the seven patients and the function score 20 points at one to five years follow-up. DISCUSSION: Arthroscopy after unicompartmental prosthesis for knee pain can give good results for unexplained pain, both in terms of diagnosis and in terms of etiological treatment. In certain knees, diagnostic arthroscopy can enable identification of the cause of pain after unicompartmental prosthesis. Therapeutic arthroscopy avoids repeated arthrotomy and shortens recovery time.

Servien E, Saffarini M, Lustig S, Chomel S, Neyret P. · Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Centre Albert-Trillat, Hopital de la Croix-Rousse, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France. · Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. · Pubmed #18779949 No free full text.

Abstract: The purpose of this study was to analyze the in vivo dimensions of each tibial plateau for planning of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), and to compare the morphometric data to the dimensions of nine current designs of UKA tibial components. Thirty-seven knees (31 females and 6 males) operated on with UKA were studied. All patients were examined postoperatively using computed tomography (CT). There were 18 lateral and 19 medial UKAs. On the CT scan, each operated tibial plateau was measured in the transverse plane at the resection level, just below the full polyethylene tibial component. We measured the length of the anteroposterior (AP) cut as well as the maximal mediolateral dimension of the resected plateau (perpendicular to the AP cut). We compared the measurements with nine current UKA systems: Accuris (Smith and Nephew), Advance (Wright Medical), HLS Uni Evolution (Tornier), Miller-Galante and "ZUK" (Zimmer), Oxford and Oxford alpha (Biomet), Preservation (DePuy) and Unix (Stryker). There was good correlation between patient height and mediolateral dimension (r=0.6), and between patient height and area of total tibial plateau (r=0.7). The anteroposterior dimension was greater for the medial plateau (mean 50.8 mm, SD 3.3) than for the lateral plateau (mean 47.2 mm, SD 3.3). This difference was statistically significant (P=0.0016). Some UKA implants are designed with an asymmetric femoral component, but none have an asymmetric tibial component. The present study suggests, however, that the shape of the medial tibial plateau differs from that of the lateral plateau. This difference can lead to mediolateral overhang for medial UKA, if the surgeon aims for optimal anteroposterior coverage.

Debarge R, Lustig S, Neyret P, Ait Si Selmi T. · Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique, Centre Livet, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, Caluire, France. · Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. · Pubmed #18555863 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: For hip prosthesis surgery, the challenge is to obtain optimal function of the instrumented hip but also to eliminate any limb length discrepancy, correct the femur offset and guarantee the center of rotation of the hip joint. Preoperative planning for total hip arthroplasty (THA) enables determination of the appropriate length for the prosthetic neck and the size and eventually the type of implants to use. From a prospective series of 86 patients who underwent first-intention THA for implantation of a noncemented prosthesis, we studied the precision of the outcome as function of the preoperative planning. We also ascertained whether the preoperative planning was sufficient to provide the measurements necessary for correct implant position. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We analyzed a prospective series of patients who underwent first-intention THA from January 2004 through January 2006. To be eligible for inclusion, patients could not have a THA of the contralateral hip. The series was composed of 58 females and 28 males, mean age 70.2 years (range 45-93). The reasons for THA were primary degenerative disease (n=76) and aseptic osteonecrosis (n=10). The contalateral hip was intact and free of osteoarthritis with an anatomic presentation considered to be normal. The standard X-ray protocol included an anteroposterior view of the pelvis in the upright position and 10 degrees internal rotation obtained preoperatively and three months postoperatively. All radiographic measurements were made by the same investigator using a manual nondigitalized technique. We compared planning parameters (pivot size and type, length of the neck, and size of the cup) with the final outcome in order to determine the compliance with the preoperative planning. All operations were performed in the lateral supine position under general anesthesia and by the same surgeon. The posterolateral Moore approach was used. All implants were press fit without cement, both for the cup and for the femoral piece. RESULTS: All planning parameters selected for study (offset, size of the head and the cup, length of the neck) were available for 32 hips, giving an overall conformity of 37%. The length of the neck was as planned in 75% of hips, the size of the cup in 62% and the size of the femoral stem in 64%. The offset defined preoperatively was never changed during the operation. Ideal implantation (+/- 5mm for all criteria selected for study) was obtained in 60% of hips; the height of the center of rotation was reproduced in 81% and the lateralization in 84%. Femur lateralization was reproduced in 75% of the hips and hip offset in 66%. Leg length discrepancy was avoided in 85% of the patients. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: Preoperative planning reliably predicts the final offset of the implanted femoral stem. It is more difficult to predict the size of a press fit cup but in our experience the difference does not greatly affect restitution of the hip anatomy. We readily changed the length of the neck during the operation if necessary and have found that the leg length has been better with this approach. This leads to the observation that all of the planning parameters are not fully accurate because of the magnification effect, anatomic conditions, or possible defective execution. While the overall rate of conformity was low, looking at the results for each element separately provided a useful element for each phase of the operation. We recommend planning a medium length neck so it can be easily changed during the operation. The availability of offset measurements is particularly important to control hip lateralization and leg length. Current advances in computer-assisted surgery should be helpful in improving the imperfections of preoperative planning.

Lustig S, Lavoie F, Selmi TA, Servien E, Neyret P. · Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Livet, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 8, rue de Margnolles, 69300 Caluire, Lyon, France. · Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. · Pubmed #18478201 No free full text.

Abstract: Many authors presented the epicondylar axis as the fixed axis of rotation of the femoral condyles during flexion of the knee. Positioning of the femoral component of a total knee arthroplasty (TKA) based on the epicondyles has been proposed. This work is a critical analysis of this concept. Metallic bodies were inserted at the level of collateral ligament insertions on 16 dried femurs, allowing us to locate the surgical epicondylar axis. The dried femurs were studied using standard radiographs and CT-scan. CT cuts were made perpendicular to the epicondylar axis. The medial mechanical femoral angle and the epicondylar angle were measured on the radiographs. The posterior and distal epiphyseal rotations relative to the epicondylar axis (Posterior Condylar Angle, PCA, and Distal Condylar Angle, DCA, respectively) were measured on the CT-scans. PCA and DCA values were compared. The centre of the posterior femoral condyles was located on sagittal reconstructions using the tangent method and was confirmed with circular templates, and then compared to the location of the epicondyles. Circle-fitting of the entire femoral condylar contours centred on the epicondyles was also tried. The mechanical femoral axis was nearly perpendicular to the epicondylar axis but with important variations. The average PCA and DCA were 1.9 degrees +/- 1.8 degrees and 3.1 degrees +/- 2.1 degrees , respectively. No relationship could be established between the mechanical femoral angle and the PCA. The individual differences between the PCA and the DCA averaged 2.2 degrees . A significant distance was found between the centre of the condylar contours and the epicondyles: 6.5 mm in average on the lateral side (range 2.3-11.3 mm) and 8.4 mm on the medial side (range 4.0-11.6 mm). Circle-fitting of the entire medial or lateral femoral condylar contours centred on the epicondyles was not possible. The centre of the posterior femoral condyles is significantly different from the epicondylar axis, thus refuting the conclusions of previous authors. Furthermore, considering the differences between the distal and posterior condylar angles shown here, as well as the difficulty of repeatably locating the epicondyles during surgery, using the epicondylar axis as the only landmark to position the femoral component during a first intention TKA is not recommended. The surgical epicondylar axis does not appear to be an adequate basis for the understanding of the shape of the distal femur.

Lustig S, Vaz G, Guyen O, Tayot O, Chavane H, Bejui-Hugues J, Carret JP. · Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Pavillon T, Hôpital Edouard Herriot, 5, place d'Arsonval, 69437 Lyon cedex 03. · Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. · Pubmed #18166955 No free full text.

Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: Revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) after hip arthrodesis is an uncommon and challenging operation. The task would appear to be even more difficult if the arthrodesis was performed because of septic arthritis due to the theoretical risk of recurrent infection. We report our fifteen-year experience. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This retrospective study concerned 17 procedures performed in 17 patients (11 women, 6 men) between 1988 and 2003 on 5 right and 12 left hips. All of the patients had arthrodesis for sepsis: eight subsequent to tuberculosis and nine subsequent to septic arthritis (Staphylococcus aureus). We examined the impact of the initial arthrodesis (surgical technique, position, leg length) on neighboring joints and indications for de-fusion. Mean age was 53 years (range 32-74) and on average, the patients had a fixed hip for 36 years (range 7-59). Mean follow-up was six years (range 11 months to 15 years). Revision surgery was performed via a posterolateral approach for 12 hips (nine trochanterotomies) and via an anterolateral approach for five hips for implantation of nine cemented implants, six press fit implants, and two hybrid implants (cemented cup and press fit stem). Clinical assessment at last follow-up noted pain, walking capacity and joint motion. Leg length discrepancy was measured and complications were noted. RESULTS: The position of the original arthrodesis was considered satisfactory (flexion 20 degrees , adduction 0-10 degrees , external rotation 0-20 degrees ) for eight hips; leg length discrepancy was 4 cm (2-8 cm). Neighboring joints involved concerned the lumbar spine in 15 patients, the ipsilateral knee in ten patients, the contralateral knee in eight and the contralateral hip in six. The decision to remove the arthrodesis was based on functional needs related to lumbar pain (n=6), the homolateral knee (n=10, limping and leg length discrepancy), or an operation on the ipsilateral knee. After surgery, 14 hips (83%) were free of pain with improvement of the lumbar pain and pain of the homolateral knee. Six patients walked without support but 16 still had a limp. Flexion was 78 degrees . Leg length discrepancy was 2.5 cm on average and seven patients had balanced limbs. The postoperative period was uneventful for 14 of 17 patients (one paresia of the common fibular nerve, one femoral phlebitis, one early infection). Six late complications were noted: nonunion of the greater trochanter (n=2), recurrent ankylosis (n=1) and loosening (n=3). DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: An earlier history of infection does not appear to be a contraindication for implantation of a total hip arthroplasty after hip arthrodesis. Despite the long recovery period and the modest gain in joint motion, 80% of patients were satisfied after having had a blocked hip for 36 years on average.

Aït Si Selmi T, Lustig S, Dojcinovic S, Neyret P. · Service de Chirurgie Orthopédique, Centre Livet, Hôpital de la Croix-Rousse, 8, rue des Margnolles, 69300 Caluire-Lyon. · Rev Chir Orthop Reparatrice Appar Mot. · Pubmed #17245234 links to  free full text

Abstract: PURPOSE OF THE STUDY: We wanted to determine whether the minimally invasive posterior approach for total hip arthroplasty leads to defective implant positioning or specific complications. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred total hip arthroplasties were performed in 98 patients via the posterior minimally invasive approach using a specific instrumentation between June 2003 and January 2004. All operations were performed by the same surgeon. The series included 59 men. Mean patient age was 61 years (range 25-83) and the mean body mass index as 26.1 kg/cm2 (14.1-40.7). RESULTS: Mean length of the incision was 65 mm (range 45-80 mm). Mean operative blood loss was 393 ml. The VAS decreased from 2.6 on day 1 to 1.0 on day 5. The Harris score rose from 54.5 preoperatively to 85.6 six weeks postop. Mean cup abduction was 43.6 degrees and mean anteversion 16.4 degrees . The center of the hip was restituted within 5 mm in 91% of hips. Stem alignment was 0.8 degrees varus. The femoral offset and the overall hip offset were restituted within 10 mm in 88% of hips. There were no leg length discrepancies greater than 15 mm. Two patients required in addition cup fixation intraoperatively due to acetabular fracture and cup instability. There was one vertical fissuration at the lower end of the stem on one postoperative x-ray. There were no infections nor vascular or neurological lesions. Early dislocation occurred in one 78-year-old patient. There were no revisions for complications. DISCUSSION: Total hip prosthesis implanted via the minimally invasive posterior approach is a difficult operation. Despite the use of specific instruments adapted to this limited approach, the method appear to be safe and to provide reliable results. If the incision has to be widened in a given patient, use of a familiar approach would be advisable. Experience and use of specific instruments enables proposing this technique for the majority of first intention total hip arthroplasties.