| 1 |
Review Clinical outcome measures in rheumatoid arthritis. free! 2000
van Riel PL, van Gestel AM. · University Medical Centre Nijmegen, Department of Rheumatology, Geert Grooteplein 8, 6525 GA Nijmegen, the Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11053082 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 2 |
Review Evaluation of established rheumatoid arthritis. 1999
van Gestel AM, Stucki G. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Baillieres Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10652644 No free full text.
Abstract: There are two major aspects to evaluate in patients with established RA, namely (i) the state or progress of the disease, and (ii) the effects of specific interventions. The evaluation should include reliable, valid and sensitive measures of disease activity, tissue damage and health status. It is important to recognise that measures of disease activity can be influenced by tissue damage as well. Also, in established RA, health status is likely to be influenced by both disease activity and tissue damage. Whether current rules concerning improvement or remission, which were developed in the context of early RA, can be applied to established disease has to be investigated. While use of radiographs is the current standard method of assessing damage in established RA, range-of-motion measures and muscle strength indices may be a more practical and an equally valid alternative. When selecting health status instruments one should carefully explore and pretest possible health status measures for specific clinical or study settings.
|
| 3 |
Clinical Conference Dose titration using the Disease Activity Score (DAS28) in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with anti-TNF-alpha. free! 2002
Den Broeder AA, Creemers MC, van Gestel AM, van Riel PL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center St Radboud, Nijmegen, PO Box 9101, 6500 HB, The Netherlands. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #12048289 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Anti-tumour necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha) therapy yields high response rates shortly after institution of therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and on theoretical grounds large differences in the effective dose between patients can be expected. Together with the high costs, these differences warrant new approaches to the way patients are dosed. METHODS: We used the Disease Activity Score (DAS28), a composite disease activity index, to titrate the dose of anti-TNF-alpha (adalimumab, D2E7; Knoll) in 21 patients with low disease activity in an open extension study lasting 40 weeks. The dose of anti-TNF-alpha was reduced stepwise and dosing intervals were kept stable. Disease activity and flares were assessed using the DAS28. Patients who flared received the previous effective dose. RESULTS: Dose reduction was accomplished in 15 patients. The total amount of anti-TNF-alpha given to the patients was reduced by 67%. At the end of the study the mean DAS28 had not changed and no patients dropped out because of persistent worsening of the RA. CONCLUSION: Dose titration of anti-TNF-alpha treatment using the DAS28 is feasible and leads to overall dose reduction while maintaining clinical efficacy. This approach will save costs and possibly prevent long-term side-effects.
|
| 4 |
Clinical Conference ACR and EULAR improvement criteria have comparable validity in rheumatoid arthritis trials. American College of Rheumatology European League of Associations for Rheumatology. 1999
van Gestel AM, Anderson JJ, van Riel PL, Boers M, Haagsma CJ, Rich B, Wells G, Lange ML, Felson DT. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10090187 No free full text.
Abstract: We compared the validity of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) and the European League of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) definitions of response in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) clinical trials. US: ACR and EULAR improvement criteria were calculated in 7 large randomized RA clinical trials. The discriminant validity of the response criteria between treatment groups was studied using the Mantel-Haenszel chi-squared value. To compare both sets of criteria the chi-squared ratio was determined for each trial. Europe: In 2 large randomized RA clinical trials, ACR and EULAR criteria were calculated, once with extensive and once with 28 joint counts. The classification of patients with these 4 criteria were compared with each other using cross tables. We further studied the difference in response between treatment groups per trial, the association of response with patient and investigator assessment of improvement, and the association of response with radiological progression. US: The chi-squared ratio for most trials was close to 1. There was no clear pattern suggesting that the discriminant validity of the ACR criteria was stronger than the discriminant validity of the EULAR definition of response or vice versa. Europe: Conflicting results between ACR and EULAR were present in only 3% of patients in both trials. The discriminant validity of all 4 criteria (ACR and EULAR with reduced and extensive joint counts) was comparable. All criteria were related with the overall assessment of improvement by both investigator and patient. The association with radiographic progression was comparable for EULAR and ACR improvement criteria. There is a high level of agreement between ACR and EULAR improvement classification, and their validity is equivalent. The discriminating potential of the criteria between treatment groups is comparable, as is the association with patient's and investigator's overall assessment and with radiographic progression.
|
| 5 |
Article The initial validation of a Markov model for the economic evaluation of (new) treatments for rheumatoid arthritis. 2006
Welsing PM, Severens JL, Hartman M, van Gestel AM, van Riel PL, Laan RF. · Department of Rheumatology, Radboud University Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Pharmacoeconomics. · Pubmed #17002483 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Markov models are increasingly used in economic evaluations of (new) treatments for chronic diseases. In this study we propose a Markov model with health states defined by the disease activity score (DAS) to be used to extrapolate efficacy data from short-term clinical trials in rheumatoid arthritis to longer term cost-effectiveness results. Moreover, we perform an initial validation of this model. METHODS: To test the validity of the model, the expected disease course (according to the model) was first compared with the observed disease course in an inception cohort of newly diagnosed rheumatoid arthritis patients. Then the relationship of the health states with utility and costs was investigated. Finally, costs and QALYs were calculated for usual care of patients in the first 5 years of their disease using the model and compared with the literature. RESULTS: The model seemed to be able to extrapolate 1-year efficacy data as seen by a comparable distribution over the Markov states between the model results and the observational data. The health states had a significant relationship with costs and utility, and population characteristics had only a moderate effect on the cost and utility values of the Markov states. The distribution over the Markov states resulted in 3.266 expected QALYs per patient over 5 years. The expected medical and total costs per patient over 5 years were 6754 euro (1997 values) and 12,641 euro, respectively, for standard rheumatoid arthritis care in The Netherlands. CONCLUSION: The developed Markov model seems a valid model for use in economic evaluations in rheumatoid arthritis. The model produced similar utilities, but lower total costs, to those in previously published studies. Although the steps to develop and validate this Markov model were applied in the context of rheumatoid arthritis, they can be generalised to other chronic diseases.
|
| 6 |
Article The relationship between disease activity and radiologic progression in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal analysis. free! 2004
Welsing PM, Landewé RB, van Riel PL, Boers M, van Gestel AM, van der Linden S, Swinkels HL, van der Heijde DM. · University Medical Center Nijmegen, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15248205 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Radiologic progression in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered the consequence of persistent inflammatory activity. To determine whether a change in disease activity is related to a change in radiologic progression in individual patients, we investigated the longitudinal relationship between inflammatory disease activity and subsequent radiologic progression. METHODS: The databases of the University Medical Center Nijmegen (UMCN) cohort and the Maastricht Combination Therapy in RA (COBRA) followup study cohort were analyzed. The UMCN cohort included 185 patients with early RA who were followed up for up to 9 years. Patients were assessed every 3 months for disease activity and every 3 years for radiologic damage. The COBRA cohort included 152 patients with early RA who were followed up for up to 6 years. Patients were assessed at least every year for disease activity and every 12 months for radiologic damage. Disease activity was assessed with the Disease Activity Score (DAS) (original DAS in the UMCN cohort, DAS28 in the COBRA cohort). Radiologic damage was measured by the Sharp/van der Heijde score in both cohorts. Data were analyzed with longitudinal regression analysis (generalized estimating equations [GEE]), using autoregression for longitudinal associations and radiologic damage as the dependent variable. Time, time(2) baseline predictors for radiologic progression and their interactions with time, as well as DAS/DAS28 (actual values or interval means and interval SDs of the means) were subsequently modeled as explanatory variables. RESULTS: Data analyzed by GEE showed a decrease in radiologic progression over time (regression coefficient for time(2) -1.0 [95% confidence interval -1.4, -0.6] in the UMCN cohort and -0.4 [95% confidence interval -0.8, 0.0] in the COBRA cohort). After adjustment for time effects and baseline predictors of radiologic progression and their interactions with time, a positive longitudinal relationship was indicated by autoregressive GEE between the mean interval DAS and radiologic progression in the UMCN cohort (regression coefficient 5.4 [95% confidence interval 2.1, 8.6]), and between the DAS28 and radiologic progression in the COBRA cohort (regression coefficient 1.4 [95% confidence interval 0.8, 2.0]). In the UMCN cohort, the SD of the mean interval DAS was independently longitudinally related to the radiologic progression over the same periods (regression coefficient 20.2 [95% confidence interval 7.2, 33.3]). In both cohorts, the longitudinal relationships between (fluctuations in) disease activity and radiologic progression were found selectively in rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive patients. CONCLUSION: Radiologic progression is not linear in individual patients. Fluctuations in disease activity are directly related to changes in radiologic progression, which supports the hypothesis that disease activity causes radiologic damage. This relationship might only exist in RF-positive patients.
|
| 7 |
Article The relationship between disease activity, joint destruction, and functional capacity over the course of rheumatoid arthritis. free! 2001
Welsing PM, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, Kiemeney LA, van Riel PL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11592361 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between functional capacity, disease activity, and joint destruction over the course of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The followup data on 378 patients with early RA (duration <1 year), included in an open, prospective study since 1985 at the Department of Rheumatology of the University Medical Center Nijmegen, were used. Functional capacity, disease activity, and joint destruction were assessed using the Health Assessment Questionnaire disability index (HAQ DI), the Disease Activity Score (DAS), and a modification of the sharp radiographic damage score, respectively. Multiple linear regression was used to model the data collected at 0, 3, 6, and 9 years after study start, to investigate which variables influenced functional capacity during the disease course. A general linear mixed model for longitudinal data, which included the variables identified as significant in the multiple linear regression models and several interaction terms between the variables, was run. RESULTS: On average, the functional capacity of the patients, as measured by the HAQ DI, worsened over the course of the disease after an initial improvement. After an initial reduction in the extent of disease activity, the mean DAS remained more or less stable over the course of the disease. The mean modified sharp joint damage score worsened over the course of the disease, with a slower progression rate later in the disease. In the multiple linear regression at 0, 3, and 6 years after study start, disease activity was found to be an important factor influencing functional capacity, and at 6 and 9 years, joint damage had an important effect on functional capacity. Furthermore, at 6 and 9 years, there was an interaction effect of joint destruction with disease activity. In the general linear mixed model, disease activity, joint damage, and an interaction effect of disease activity and joint damage were the main factors explaining functional capacity. CONCLUSION: The effect of disease activity and joint destruction on functional capacity changes over the course of the disease. In early RA, functional capacity is most associated with disease activity, and in late disease, with joint damage.
|
| 8 |
Article Influence of sex, age, and menopausal state on the course of early rheumatoid arthritis. 2001
Kuiper S, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, de Boo TM, da Silva JA, van Riel PL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11508583 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the influences of the menopausal state, sex, and age on the course and outcome of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: A cohort of patients with early RA (209 female, 123 male) was studied. Sex, age, and menopausal state at baseline, and disease activity, radiographic joint destruction, and physical disability during 6 years of followup were assessed. RESULTS: The Disease Activity Score (DAS) was significantly higher in female compared to male patients at any time point except at the time of inclusion. This was mainly due to postmenopausal patients. Radiographic joint destruction (RJD) was significantly worse in female patients compared to males at the time of inclusion. Postmenopausal patients had significantly higher RJD than premenopausal patients at the time of inclusion and 3 years thereafter. Older male patients showed worse RJD than younger male patients at all time points measured. Physical disability was significantly worse in female compared to male patients, as well as in postmenopausal compared to premenopausal patients, and older male compared to younger male patients. Stepwise regression analysis revealed that at 3 years higher age and female sex were the best predictors for a worse DAS. Higher age and the interaction term between menopausal state and age best predicted higher RJD. Higher age and the interaction term between menopausal state and age best predicted Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score. CONCLUSION: Higher age at presentation of RA leads to a more severe disease course in terms of DAS, RJD, and HAQ. Although female sex has a deteriorating effect on the DAS, the menopausal state is responsible for the major part of the differences in outcome between men and women. Postmenopausal state in early RA influences future disability and damage, especially in older patients.
|
| 9 |
Article Health Assessment Questionnaire modifications: is standardisation needed? free! 2001
Zandbelt MM, Welsing PM, van Gestel AM, van Riel PL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Centre St Radboud, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #11502610 links to free full text
Abstract: BACKGROUND: Physical disability is part of the end point measures in rheumatoid arthritis clinical trials. The Stanford Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ DI) is often used for this purpose but lacks international uniformity owing to variations in the translated and adapted questionnaires and variations in its calculation. To study the consequences of these variations the previous Dutch HAQ (HAQ90) was revised, resulting in a new Dutch HAQ (HAQ99). OBJECTIVE: To compare DI scores from the two versions, and to study the consequences of applying different calculation methods for the DI score. METHODS: 78 patients completed both the HAQ99 and the HAQ90. To compare the use of different category score calculation methods a post hoc analysis on prospectively collected data obtained in clinical trials was performed. RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were observed between the DI scores of the HAQ90 and the HAQ99 using the alternative method (that is, without correcting for aid and devices). However, correcting for the use of aid or devices or not did result in statistically significant different DI scores. The systematic shift when using the maximum or mean item score for calculation of the category score resulted in non-comparable absolute DI scores. CONCLUSION: The use of HAQ DI questionnaires with different numbers of items and/or categories does not hinder international comparability, except when these variations interfere with the calculation method of the DI (as in the case of questionnaires without a section correcting for devices). For the sake of international uniformity the HAQ or any validated translation should be used and calculated in a standard way, including correcting for the use of aid and devices, and taking the maximum within each category as the category score.
|
| 10 |
Article Chronic comorbidity in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis: a descriptive study. 2001
Kroot EJ, van Gestel AM, Swinkels HL, Albers MM, van de Putte LB, van Riel PL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11469455 No free full text.
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To study the presence of chronic coexisting diseases in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and its effect on RA treatment, disease course, and outcome during the first years of the disease. METHODS: From January 1985 to December 1990, 186 patients with recent onset RA were enrolled in a prospective longitudinal study. Between January 1991 and November 1992 patients were interviewed on the basis of a comorbidity questionnaire. For analysis the diseases were coded according to the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) medical diagnoses. Disease activity during the period of followup was measured by the Disease Activity Score. Outcome in terms of physical disability (Health Assessment Questionnaire) and radiological damage (Sharp's modified version) over 3 and 6 year periods was determined. RESULTS: In the group of 186 patients, with mean disease duration of 4.3 years at January 1991, 50 patients (27%) reported at least one chronic coexisting disease. The most frequently reported coexisting diseases were of cardiovascular (29%), respiratory (18%), or dermatological (11%) origin. For the major part (66%) chronic coexisting diseases were already present before onset of RA. No statistically significant differences in use of disease modifying antirheumatic drugs or corticosteroids were observed between RA patients with and without chronic coexisting diseases. No statistically significant differences were found in disease activity or in outcome in terms of physical disability and radiological damage over 3 and 6 year periods between the 2 groups with RA. CONCLUSION: The results showed that about 27% of patients with RA in this inception cohort had at least one chronic coexisting disease. Treatment, disease course, and outcome did not differ between patients with and without chronic coexisting diseases during the first years of the disease.
|
| 11 |
Article Socio-economic consequences of rheumatoid arthritis in the first years of the disease. free! 1999
Albers JM, Kuper HH, van Riel PL, Prevoo ML, van 't Hof MA, van Gestel AM, Severens JL. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Nijmegen, The Netherlands. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10371280 links to free full text
Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Few data have been presented to document the impact of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) on socio-economic well-being. In this study, exact figures on socio-economic consequences were assessed. METHODS: The socio-economic consequences were studied in an inception cohort (186 early RA patients, mean disease duration 3 yr) by measuring the change in work capability, income, rest during the daytime, leisure time activity, transport mobility, housing and social support occurring in the first years of the disease. RESULTS: For 89% of the patients, RA had an impact on one of the socio-economic items; for 58%, at least three of these items were affected simultaneously. Work disability appeared to be 4-15 times higher than in the general population. After 3 yr, 42% of the patients were registered as work disabled. Nearly a quarter of the patients experienced income reduction. Over 40% of the patients claimed extra rest during the daytime. Leisure activity changed towards activities with a lower joint load. There was a decline in transport mobility for 52% of the patients. Social support increased strongly. CONCLUSIONS: Socio-economic change already presents in the first years of RA and appears to be influenced by age, gender, marital status and work disability. Furthermore, physical limitation appeared to be predictive for work-related income reduction, reduced transport mobility and development of social dependency.
|
| 12 |
Minor Area under the curve for the American College of Rheumatology improvement criteria: a valid addition to existing criteria in rheumatoid arthritis? free! 2001
van Riel PL, van Gestel AM. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11465727 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
| 13 |
Minor Improvement criteria--clinical and statistical significance: comment on the article by Pincus and Stein. free! 2000
van Gestel AM, van Riel PL. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10902775 links to free full text
This publication has no abstract.
|
|
|