Rheumatoid Arthritis: Zink A

Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Bombardieri S, Choi H, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Gomez-Reino J, Keystone E, Koch G, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Matucci-Cerinic M, Michaud K, O'Dell J, Paulus H, Pincus T, Richards P, Simon L, Siegel J, Smolen JS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, van der Heijde D, van Riel P, Vlad S, van Vollenhoven R, Ward M, Weinblatt M, Wells G, White B, Wolfe F, Zhang B, Zink A, Felson D, Anonymous00358, Anonymous00359. · Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18821648 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations on how to report disease activity in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) endorsed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). METHODS: The project followed the EULAR standardized operating procedures, which use a three-step approach: 1) expert-based definition of relevant research questions (November 2006); 2) systematic literature search (November 2006 to May 2007); and 3) expert consensus on recommendations based on the literature search results (May 2007). In addition, since this is the first joint EULAR/ACR publication on recommendations, an extra step included a meeting with an ACR panel to approve the recommendations elaborated by the expert group (August 2007). RESULTS: Eleven relevant questions were identified for the literature search. Based on the evidence from the literature, the expert panel recommended that each trial should report the following items: 1) disease activity response and disease activity states; 2) appropriate descriptive statistics of the baseline, the endpoints and change of the single variables included in the core set; 3) baseline disease activity levels (in general); 4) the percentage of patients achieving a low disease activity state and remission; 5) time to onset of the primary outcome; 6) sustainability of the primary outcome; 7) fatigue. CONCLUSION: These recommendations endorsed by EULAR and ACR will help harmonize the presentations of results from clinical trials. Adherence to these recommendations will provide the readership of clinical trials with more details of important outcomes, while the higher level of homogeneity may facilitate the comparison of outcomes across different trials and pooling of trial results, such as in meta-analyses.

Zink A, Gromnica-Ihle E. · No affiliation provided · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16788838 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Zink A. · No affiliation provided · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #15517296 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Mau W, Beyer W, Ehlebracht-König I, Engel M, Genth E, Greitemann B, Jäckel WH, Zink A. · Institut für Rehabilitationsmedizin, Medizinische Fakultät der Martin-Luther-Universität Halle-Wittenberg, 06097, Halle (Saale), Deutschland. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #18299856 No free full text.

Abstract: A synopsis of different socio-medical consequences of inflammatory rheumatic diseases is not yet available for Germany. Therefore, the data reported during the past decade for rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis, systemic sclerosis, systemic lupus erythematodes, and Wegener's granulomatosis are summarized in this article. Apart from clinical studies, relevant data sources were the national data base of the German collaborative arthritis centres, statistical figures from the compulsory health insurance and the national pension insurance scheme.Data were mainly available for sick leave and work disability showing limitations, which frequently occurred during the early course of diseases and increased with disease duration. Furthermore, different risk factors were identified. Measures to maintain continued participation in the labour force, such as part-time employment, partial work disability instead of full work disability, were not being adequately utilized. Only few data regarding the need of help and care were available. The proportion of patients in need of help and care increased with the duration of rheumatoid arthritis to more than 50% after more than 2 decades.This review presents detailed information concerning aspects of the burden of rheumatic diseases, which are frequently not adequately taken into account. They may be useful for the advice and care of individual patients as well as for decision processes concerning the health care system.

Westhoff G, Zink A. · Forschungsbereich Rheumatologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17334734 No free full text.

Abstract: The major challenge in the management of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is the early initiation and long-term continuation of disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. A total of 916 RA patients (ACR criteria, disease duration <2 years) were investigated in regard to frequency and reasons for DMARD discontinuation. All patients were under rheumatological care at the start of the observation and almost all were receiving DMARDs at study entry (95%). The proportion decreased to 87% within 3 years. Of the 171 patients without DMARD, 5% abstained due to (planned) pregnancy, 28% due to contraindications and/or severe adverse events and 54% due to remission. Only 12% were non-compliant. Multivariate regression analysis revealed non-specialised care (OR 4.6; 59% CI 3.2-6.7), RF seronegativity (OR 2.6; 95% CI 1.8-3.8), no patient education (OR 2.2; CI 95% 1.5-3.4), preference for alternative medicine (OR 8.2; 95% CI 4.0-16.8) and > or =10 years of education (OR 1.8; 95% CI 1.3-2.7) as independent risks for DMARD abstention. Age, sex, comorbidity or disease activity did not influence adherence to DMARD therapy. Since preference for alternative medicine was the strongest risk predictor, further investigations are needed to determine the characteristics of this preference regarding compliance with DMARD medication in RA. The positive influence of patient education on DMARD continuation emphasizes its importance.

Zink A, Huscher D, Westhoff G. · Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin Forschungsbereich Epidemiologie Schumannstr. 21/22 1077 Berlin, Germany. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11974489 No free full text.

Abstract: One of the areas of research in the Rheumatology Competence Network deals with health services research. It evaluates the structures and outcomes of rheumatological care. The paper presents selected results from the projects in the field of health services research. Data for rheumatoid arthritis are presented according to the criteria for the inclusion of diseases in new health care programs ("Disease Management"). The national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centers and cohort studies show the high individual and economic burden of disease in rheumatoid arthritis. Treatment by rheumatologists and non-rheumatologists differs greatly and leads to different outcomes. There is great potential for improvement. Data on practice variation within the rheumatologic subspecialty are used for quality management. The involvement of rheumatology into new concepts of care offers the chance to show the effectiveness of rheumatologic care and to enhance existing forms of cooperation.

Zink A, Mau W, Schneider M. · Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin, Forschungsbereich Epidemiologie, Schumannstrasse 21-22, 10117 Berlin. · Internist (Berl). · Pubmed #11244876 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Sparmann M, Wolke B, Czupalla H, Banzer D, Zink A. · Orthopaedic Department, Immanuel Hospital, Free University of Berlin, Berlin, Germany. · J Bone Joint Surg Br. · Pubmed #12931800 links to  free full text

Abstract: We conducted this prospective randomised and externally evaluated study to investigate whether the use of a navigation system during total knee arthroplasty leads to significantly better results than the hand-guided technique. A total of 240 patients was included in the study. All patients received a condylar knee prosthesis. Two surgeons performed all the operations using the Stryker knee navigation system. Exclusion criteria included the necessity for the primary use of constrained implants. The results revealed a highly significant difference between the two groups in favour of navigation with regard to the mechanical axis, the frontal and sagittal femoral axis and the frontal tibial axis (p < 0.0001). The use of a navigation system was therefore shown to improve the alignment of the implant.

Westhoff G, Schneider M, Raspe H, Zeidler H, Runge C, Volmer T, Zink A. · Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19321515 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of health care for RA patients in the general population of Germany. METHODS: A three-stage population survey was conducted to identify individuals with RA using a health care access panel (18-79 years; n = 70,112). A 20-item postal screening questionnaire of musculoskeletal symptoms and diagnoses was followed by a detailed questionnaire for those who indicated the possibility of having RA. Respondents who fulfilled the modified ACR decision tree, who reported an RA diagnosis, care by a rheumatologist or the use of DMARDs were asked to participate in a clinical examination by rheumatologists who diagnosed the participants and rated the adequacy of treatment. RESULTS: RA could not be ruled out in 1177 cases, of which 643 agreed to participate in the clinical examination, which was finally attended by 317 participants. Attendees did not differ with regard to any health or treatment measure from those who did not attend. Forty-one RA patients were detected. Of them, 93% had seen a rheumatologist at least once and 63% within the last 12 months. A total of 73% had received DMARD therapy at some time and 59% were currently receiving it. An unmet need for DMARDs was discovered in 29% of the RA attendees. It pertained almost exclusively to the seronegative cases of which 29% had a need to start and 17% to increase a DMARD therapy according to the opinion of the examining rheumatologist. CONCLUSION: Health care for RA patients has improved significantly since the last German RA survey in 1989. However, DMARD prescription still does not meet clinical recommendations, specifically in RF-negative patients. Since seronegative RA is a treatable disease, this group should not be overlooked.

Strangfeld A, Listing J, Herzer P, Liebhaber A, Rockwitz K, Richter C, Zink A. · Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Center, Chariteplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · JAMA. · Pubmed #19224750 No free full text.

Abstract: CONTEXT: The risk of bacterial infection is increased in patients treated with drugs that inhibit tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-alpha). Little is known about the reactivation of latent viral infections during treatment with TNF-alpha inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether TNF-alpha inhibitors together as a class, or separately as either monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibodies (adalimumab, infliximab) or a fusion protein (etanercept), are related to higher rates of herpes zoster in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Patients were enrolled in the German biologics register RABBIT, a prospective cohort, between May 2001 and December 2006 at the initiation of treatment with infliximab, etanercept, adalimumab, or anakinra, or when they changed conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD). Treatment, clinical status, and adverse events were assessed by rheumatologists at fixed points during follow-up. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratio (HR) of herpes zoster episodes following anti-TNF-alpha treatment. Study aims were to detect a clinically significant difference (HR, 2.0) between TNF-alpha inhibitors as a class compared with DMARDs and to detect an HR of at least 2.5 for each of 2 types of TNF-alpha inhibitors, the monoclonal antibodies or the fusion protein, compared with conventional DMARDs. RESULTS: Among 5040 patients receiving TNF-alpha inhibitors or conventional DMARDs, 86 episodes of herpes zoster occurred in 82 patients. Thirty-nine occurrences could be attributed to treatment with anti-TNF-alpha antibodies, 23 to etanercept, and 24 to conventional DMARDs. The crude incidence rate per 1000 patient-years was 11.1 (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.9-15.1) for the monoclonal antibodies, 8.9 (95% CI, 5.6-13.3) for etanercept, and 5.6 (95% CI, 3.6-8.3) for conventional DMARDs. Adjusted for age, rheumatoid arthritis severity, and glucocorticoid use, a significantly increased risk was observed for treatment with the monoclonal antibodies (HR, 1.82 [95% CI, 1.05-3.15]), although this risk was lower than the threshold for clinical significance. No significant associations were found for etanercept use (HR, 1.36 [95% CI, 0.73-2.55]) or for anti-TNF-alpha treatment (HR, 1.63 [95% CI, 0.97-2.74]) as a class. CONCLUSION: Treatment with monoclonal anti-TNF-alpha antibodies may be associated with increased risk of herpes zoster, but this requires further study.

Karonitsch T, Aletaha D, Boers M, Bombardieri S, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Felson D, Gomez-Reino J, Keystone E, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Matucci-Cerinic M, Richards P, van Riel P, Siegel J, Smolen JS, Sokka T, van der Heijde D, van Vollenhoven R, Ward M, Wells G, Zink A, Landewe R. · Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18791056 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To use an evidence-based and consensus-based approach to elaborate recommendations on how to report disease activity in clinical trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) endorsed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). METHODS: After an initial expert meeting, during which relevant research questions were identified, a systematic literature search was performed using Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Library as sources. To ensure literature retrieved was comprehensive, we emphasised search algorithms that were sensitive rather than specific. The results of the literature search were discussed by the expert panel, modified and expanded, and were used as the basis for the elaboration of the recommendation in the consensus process. Finally, an independent ACR panel approved these items with some minor modifications. RESULTS: The following pieces of evidence were obtained from the literature search: (1) timing and the sustaining of a response is relevant to achieve better outcomes; (2) composite disease activity indices have been used to define low disease activity and remission and these definitions have been validated as has the American Rheumatism Association (ARA) remission criteria. The "patient-reported symptom state" (PASS) is not yet well validated; (3) evidence was obtained to identify those measures, scales and patient-reported instruments, for which there is a documented association with relevant outcomes; (4) baseline disease activity is associated with disease activity levels at the end of follow-up; and (5) there was not sufficient evidence relating the added benefit of MRI or ultrasound over clinical assessments. Most data stemmed from observational studies rather than clinical trials and literature review was supplemented by input from experts. The results served as the basis for the elaboration of the seven recommendations by the experts. CONCLUSIONS: The approach based on scientific evidence from the literature as well as on expert input provided sufficient information to derive recommendations on reporting disease activity in RA clinical trials. The methodology, results and conclusions of this project were endorsed by EULAR and the ACR.

Aletaha D, Landewe R, Karonitsch T, Bathon J, Boers M, Bombardier C, Bombardieri S, Choi H, Combe B, Dougados M, Emery P, Gomez-Reino J, Keystone E, Koch G, Kvien TK, Martin-Mola E, Matucci-Cerinic M, Michaud K, O'Dell J, Paulus H, Pincus T, Richards P, Simon L, Siegel J, Smolen JS, Sokka T, Strand V, Tugwell P, van der Heijde D, van Riel P, Vlad S, van Vollenhoven R, Ward M, Weinblatt M, Wells G, White B, Wolfe F, Zhang B, Zink A, Felson D. · Division of Rheumatology, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18791055 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To make recommendations on how to report disease activity in clinical trials of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) endorsed by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and the American College of Rheumatology (ACR). METHODS: The project followed the EULAR standardised operating procedures, which use a three-step approach: (1) expert-based definition of relevant research questions (November 2006); (2) systematic literature search (November 2006 to May 2007); and (3) expert consensus on recommendations based on the literature search results (May 2007). In addition, since this is the first joint EULAR/ACR publication on recommendations, an extra step included a meeting with an ACR panel to approve the recommendations elaborated by the expert group (August 2007). RESULTS: Eleven relevant questions were identified for the literature search. Based on the evidence from the literature the expert panel recommended that each trial should report the following items: (1) disease activity response and disease activity states; (2) appropriate descriptive statistics of the baseline, the endpoints and change of the single variables included in the core set; (3) baseline disease activity levels (in general); (4) the percentage of patients achieving a low disease activity state and remission; (5) time to onset of the primary outcome; (6) sustainability of the primary outcome; (7) fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: These recommendations endorsed by EULAR and ACR will help harmonise the presentations of results from clinical trials. Adherence to these recommendations will provide the readership of clinical trials with more details of important outcomes, while the higher level of homogeneity may facilitate the comparison of outcomes across different trials and pooling of trial results, such as in meta-analyses.

Huscher D, Thiele K, Gromnica-Ihle E, Hein G, Demary W, Dreher R, Zink A, Buttgereit F. · German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Epidemiology Unit, Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18684744 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To identify patterns of self-reported health problems relating to dose and duration of glucocorticoid intake in unselected patients with rheumatoid arthritis from routine practice. METHODS: Data from 1066 patients were analysed. The clinical status and drug treatment were reported by the physician, health problems during the past 6 months by the patient using a comprehensive list of symptoms. Patients with ongoing glucocorticoid treatment for more than 6 months and current doses of less than 5, 5-7.5 and over 7.5 mg/day prednisone equivalent were compared with a group without any glucocorticoid treatment for at least 12 months. RESULTS: The frequency of self-reported health problems was lowest in the group without glucocorticoid exposition and increased with dosage. Two distinct dose-related patterns of adverse events were observed. A "linear" rising with increasing dose was found for cushingoid phenotype, ecchymosis, leg oedema, mycosis, parchment-like skin, shortness of breath and sleep disturbance. A "threshold pattern" describing an elevated frequency of events beyond a certain threshold value was observed at dosages of over 7.5 mg/day for glaucoma, depression/listlessness and increase in blood pressure. Dosages of 5 mg/day or more were associated with epistaxis and weight gain. A very low threshold was seen for eye cataract (<5 mg/day). CONCLUSION: The associations found are in agreement with biological mechanisms and clinical observations. As there is a paucity of real-life data on adverse effects of glucocorticoids prescribed to unselected groups of patients, these data may help the clinician to adapt therapy with glucocorticoids accordingly and improve the benefit-risk ratio.

Westhoff G, Buttgereit F, Gromnica-Ihle E, Zink A. · Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18413345 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe the association between morning stiffness (MS) and early retirement in patients with early RA. METHODS: The study used data from a prospective RA cohort of 916 RA patients with disease duration <or=24 months. Data pertained to standard clinical measures and patients' self-reports, such as functional capacity, pain and MS. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the association between MS and early retirement at 3 yrs, adjusting for sex, age, baseline working status, functional capacity, pain and 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28). RESULTS: MS was strongly associated with pain and functional capacity and to a lesser degree with joint counts and active phase responses. Severe MS in early disease had a significant impact on early retirement within the following 3 yrs. Of the 389 patients who were <or=61 yrs old and working at baseline, 80 (21%) had to take early retirement until the end of the study. Early retirement concerned 46% of the patients with severe and 10% of those with mild MS at study entry. Baseline working status was the strongest predictor and was severe compared with mild MS, the second strongest predictor of early retirement (adjusted odds ratio 6.0; 95% CI 2.9, 12.6). CONCLUSIONS: Severe MS in the early course of the disease has a high impact on RA patients' decision to withdraw from working life. Great attention should be paid to the effective treatment of MS in early RA, to prevent patients from possible untimely decisions that will have long-lasting and costly consequences.

Westhoff G, Rau R, Zink A. · Epidemiology Unit, German Rheumatism Research Centre Berlin, Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Germany. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18390589 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the influence of smoking on disease activity, drug need and radiographic joint damage in RF-positive and -negative patients with early RA. METHODS: Baseline and 3-yr follow-up data of 896 patients of an early RA cohort comprised clinical and radiographic parameters (Ratingen Score). Information about disease severity, treatment and smoking were obtained by questionnaires. Univariate and multivariate analyses were used to show the influence of smoking on drug use, ACR improvement and joint damage. Smokers and non-smokers were compared according to RF serology. RESULTS: Fifty per cent of the patients were never, 23% past and 27% current smokers. Current smokers were significantly more often RF-positive (71%) than past (66%) or never smokers (53%), but neither the RF-positive nor the RF-negative current smokers had higher 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) or radiographic scores than never or past smokers. Within 3 yrs, current smokers had taken significantly more DMARD combinations or biologics. Non-smokers and those with <20 pack-years (PYs) had a 2-fold higher probability to reach ACR improvement than heavy smokers (>20 PYs). However, smokers did not differ in radiographic joint damage when compared with non-smokers of the same serological group. CONCLUSIONS: The higher use of DMARDs may indicate that smoking weakens the potency of anti-rheumatic drugs and/or is needed to control an otherwise higher disease activity. Since the risk of adverse events increases with the amount of drugs taken, this is another reason to persuade RA patients to quit smoking.

Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kekow J, Schneider M, Kapelle A, Wassenberg S, Zink A. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18311816 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To determine the hazard risk of developing or worsening heart failure in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFalpha) inhibitors. METHODS: RA patients ages 18-75 years who started treatment with infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab (n = 2,757), or conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (controls; n = 1,491) at the time of enrollment in a German biologics register were studied. Cox proportional hazards models were applied to investigate the influence of disease-related and treatment-specific risk factors on the incidence or worsening of heart failure. RESULTS: The 3-year incidence rates of heart failure in patients with and patients without cardiovascular disease at the start of treatment were 2.2% and 0.4%, respectively. After adjustment for traditional cardiovascular risk factors, an increased risk of developing heart failure was found in patients who had a higher 28-joint Disease Activity Score at followup (hazard ratio [HR] 1.47 [95% confidence interval 1.07-2.02], P = 0.019). A residual nonsignificant risk related to treatment with TNFalpha inhibitors remained (adjusted HR 1.66 [95% confidence interval 0.67-4.1], P = 0.28). This residual risk was balanced by the efficacy of the anti-TNF treatment. When only baseline characteristics were taken into account, the HR related to TNFalpha inhibitor treatment decreased to 0.70 (95% confidence interval 0.27-1.84). CONCLUSION: The findings of this study indicate that TNFalpha inhibitor treatment that effectively reduces the inflammatory activity of RA is more likely to be beneficial than harmful with regard to the risk of heart failure, especially if there is no concomitant therapy with glucocorticoids or cyclooxygenase 2 inhibitors. Furthermore, the data suggest that TNFalpha inhibition does not increase the risk of worsening of prevalent heart failure.

Westhoff G, Rau R, Zink A. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17968909 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association between body mass index (BMI) and radiographic joint damage (using the Ratingen Score [RS]) in early rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: The study was carried out in 767 patients with early RA. Standard clinical data, RS, and BMI were evaluated at baseline and after 3 years. Multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed in rheumatoid factor (RF)-positive and RF-negative patients to determine the influence of BMI (<25 versus > or = 30 kg/m(2)) on considerable joint damage (RS > or = 7) after 3 years, adjusting for sex, age, disease duration, and disease activity (using the Disease Activity Scale in 28 joints [DAS28]). RESULTS: Patients of normal weight already had significantly more joint damage at study entry than obese patients (mean RS 4.5 versus 2.4; P = 0.004) and experienced significantly more progression than obese patients (RS 3.4 versus 1.3; P = 0.011). At 3 years, their RS score was twice as high as that of the obese patients (7.5 versus 3.7; P < 0.001). Multivariate regression analyses in both serologic groups revealed significantly higher odds of RS > or = 7 in RF-positive patients of normal weight than in RF-positive obese patients (odds ratio [OR] 3.3), but not in RF-negative patients. Male sex (OR 1.6), osteoporosis (OR 2.0), C-reactive protein levels >15 mg/liter versus <5 mg/liter (OR 2.6), and disease activity (DAS28 > or = 5.1 versus <3.2; OR 1.9) were independently associated with RS > or = 7. CONCLUSION: BMI provides a risk estimate of joint damage in RA patients. Further studies are needed to elucidate the association between BMI, RF, and joint damage in RA and the possible role of adipose tissue.

Zink A, Strangfeld A, Schneider M, Herzer P, Hierse F, Stoyanova-Scholz M, Wassenberg S, Kapelle A, Listing J. · German Rheumatism Research Centre and Charité University Medicine, Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #17075823 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluate the efficacy of treatments in selected groups of patients defined by strict inclusion criteria. The value of these trials in predicting therapeutic effectiveness in "real world" patients is limited. This observational cohort study was designed to complement the knowledge obtained in RCTs by evaluating the effectiveness of tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitors in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) according to their eligibility for the major trials. METHODS: Using the data from the German biologics register Rheumatoid Arthritis Observation of Biologic Therapy (RABBIT [in German]), we investigated how many of the RA patients who were treated with a TNF inhibitor (infliximab, etanercept, or adalimumab) would have been eligible for the major clinical trials that led to approval of the drugs. In addition, therapeutic effectiveness was compared in the eligible and ineligible patients using the American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) and 50% (ACR50) improvement response criteria. RESULTS: Only 21-33% of the patients in the RABBIT register would have been eligible for the major trials. In these patients, the ACR20 and ACR50 improvement responses, indicating therapeutic effectiveness, were comparable with the response rates in the published trials. ACR response rates were lower in those patients considered ineligible for the trials; however, absolute improvement was similar to that in eligible patients. Ineligible patients had lower baseline disease activity, more comorbidity, and lower functional status. CONCLUSION: RCT cohorts reflect only a minor proportion of the patients treated with biologic agents in routine care. In the clinic setting, the indications for treatment with biologic agents are not identical to the inclusion criteria for trials. Despite the smaller relative improvement achieved in these patients with longstanding, severe RA who would not fulfill the inclusion criteria of a major trial, the majority of such patients would nevertheless benefit from biologic therapy.

Westhoff G, Weber C, Zink A. · Forschungsbereich Rheumatologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin (DRFZ), Charitéplatz 1, 10117 Berlin, Deutschland. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16988848 No free full text.

Abstract: Three-year follow-up data of 1,032 patients with recent onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were analyzed regarding the frequency of 21 common comorbid chronic conditions and their impact on health outcome (i.e., pain, functional capacity, disease activity, and radiographic joint damage). Multivariate logistic regression analyses were used to calculate age- and gender-adjusted odds ratios for each chronic condition on severe functional capacity (<60% of full function). Comorbidity was already common at the onset of RA, with 72% of the patients having at least one comorbid condition and almost 50% having at least two. Common comorbidities were associated with significantly worse baseline measures in at least three of seven investigated outcome parameters. The more of these conditions patients had, the worse their 3-year outcome. Functional capacity was most sensitive to comorbid conditions. In logistic regression, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, type II diabetes, and osteoporosis resulted in a twofold risk of severe functional limitation (<60% of full function), independent of each other and of age and gender. The impact of comorbidity on measures of disease severity should be considered when used to compare outcome parameters of different RA samples.

Listing J, Strangfeld A, Rau R, Kekow J, Gromnica-Ihle E, Klopsch T, Demary W, Burmester GR, Zink A. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #16600016 links to  free full text

Abstract: We investigated the frequency of remission according to the disease activity score (DAS28) definition, modified American Rheumatology Association (ARA) criteria, and the frequency of an achievement of a functional status above defined thresholds ('functional remission', 'physical independence') in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with either biologics or conventional DMARDs. We used the data of a prospective cohort study, the German biologics register RABBIT (German acronym for Rheumatoid Arthritis--Observation of Biologic Therapy) to investigate the outcomes in RA patients with two or more DMARD failures who received new treatment with biologics (BIOL; n = 818) or a conventional DMARD (n = 265). Logistic regression analysis was applied to adjust for differences in baseline risks. Taking risk indicators such as previous DMARD failures or baseline clinical status into account, we found that biologics doubled the chance of remission compared to conventional DMARD therapies (DAS28 remission, adjusted odds ratio (OR) 1.95 (95% confidenece interval (CI) 1.2-3.2)); ARA remission, OR 2.05 (95% CI 1.2-3.5)). High remission rates (DAS28 remission, 30.6%; ARA remission, 16.9%) were observed in BIOL patients with a moderate disease activity (DAS28, 3.2 to 5.1) at the start of treatment. These rates decreased to 8.5% in patients with DAS28 > 6. Sustained remission at 6 and 12 months was achieved in <10% of the patients. Severely disabled patients (< or = 50% of full function) receiving biologic therapies were significantly more likely to achieve a status indicating physical independence (> or = 67% of full function) than controls (OR 3.88 (95% CI 1.7-8.8)). 'Functional remission' (> or = 83% of full function) was more often achieved in BIOL than in controls (OR 2.18 (95% CI 1.04-4.6)). In conclusion, our study shows that biologics increase the chance to achieve clinical remission and a status of functional remission or at least physical independence. However, temporary or even sustained remission remain ambitious aims, which are achieved in a minority of patients only.

Huscher D, Merkesdal S, Thiele K, Zeidler H, Schneider M, Zink A, Anonymous00022. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16540552 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate and compare the direct and indirect costs of illness in rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and to evaluate the effect of sex, disease duration and functional status on the various cost domains. METHODS: Data of outpatients, aged 18-65, with rheumatoid arthritis (n = 4351), ankylosing spondylitis (n = 827), PsA (n = 908) or SLE (n = 844), who were enrolled in the national database of the German collaborative arthritis centres in 2002, were analysed. Data on healthcare consumption, out-of-pocket expenses and productivity losses were derived from doctors and patients. For the calculation of indirect costs, the human capital approach (HCA) and the friction cost approach (FCA) were applied. RESULTS: Mean direct costs amounted to 4737 euros a year in rheumatoid arthritis, 3676 euros in ankylosing spondylitis, 3156 euros in PsA and 3191 euros in SLE. By using the HCA, total costs were calculated at 15,637 euros in rheumatoid arthritis, 13,513 euros in ankylosing spondylitis, 11,075 euros in PsA and 14,411 euros in SLE, whereas with the FCA the numbers were 7899 euros, 7204 euros, 5570 euros and 6518 euros, respectively. Costs increased with disease duration and were strongly dependent on functional status. In patients with the highest disability (<50% of full function), the total costs on applying the HCA were 34,915 euros in rheumatoid arthritis, 29,647 euros in alkylosing spondylitis, 37,440 euros in PsA and 32,296 euros in SLE. CONCLUSION: The costs of illness are high in all four diseases, with a strong effect of functional status on total costs. Indirect costs differ by the factor 3, based on whether the HCA or the FCA is used.

Zink A, Listing J, Strangfeld A, Gromnica-Ihle E, Demary W, Schneider M. · Forschungsbereich Epidemiologie, Deutsches Rheuma-Forschungszentrum Berlin. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16534537 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Data from international observational studies show that a considerable proportion of patients use higher dosages of infliximab (INF) than the usual 3 mg every 8 weeks used in Germany for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. The Data are, however, inconsistent and vary between countries. Using data from the German Biologics Register RABBIT we investigated: (1) how dosage of INF develops during the first year of treatment in routine care, and (2) how dosage translates into clinical effectiveness. PATIENTS: We analysed data from 344 patients who started a treatment with INF at their inclusion into the register and who were observed for the subsequent 12 months. Mean dosage at 3 months (after the loading dose) was 3.2 mg/kg body weight/infusion and 3.3 mg/kg after 1 year. If we also consider shortening the infusion intervals, the mean dosages at the start and after 1 year were 4.0 mg/kg body weight every 8 weeks. RESULTS: Patients who were treated with low dosages of up to 3 mg/kg/8 weeks showed significantly less improvement (EULAR response) than those who were treated with higher dosages. CONCLUSIONS: The data show that German rheumatologists are aware of the high costs of treatment and try to use the lowest possible dosage. However, for a certain proportion of the patients this might be insufficient.

Zink A, Thiele K, Huscher D, Listing J, Sieper J, Krause A, Gromnica-Ihle E, von Hinueber U, Wassenberg S, Genth E, Schneider M, Anonymous00144. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin, Germany. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16395755 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To compare quality of life and treatment among patients with psoriatic arthritis (PsA), rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and ankylosing spondylitis (AS) treated by German rheumatologists. METHODS: Data for outpatients with PsA (n = 1863), RA (n = 9627), or AS (n = 1378) enrolled in the national database of the German collaborative arthritis centers in the year 2002 were analyzed. Among those with PsA, 2 subgroups with predominantly peripheral arthritis (n = 1612) and predominantly axial disease (n = 251) were distinguished. RESULTS: We found a high burden of illness in patients with PsA treated by rheumatologists. Among the 2 subgroups, those with axial PsA had worse outcomes (pain, function) than those with peripheral PsA. However, compared with RA and AS, physician ratings of disease activity and severity were lower in PsA. Concerning access to rheumatology care, there were similarities between AS and axial PsA, with very long disease duration at first visit (mean of about 6 yrs), versus RA and peripheral PsA, with shorter duration (1.6 and 2.5 yrs, respectively). A majority (84%) of patients with PsA were treated with disease modifying antirheumatic drugs. Thirty percent of the patients with PsA currently were under therapy with glucocorticoids, mainly (89%) with a dose < 7.5 mg. CONCLUSION: Patients with PsA seen in rheumatologic care have a burden of illness comparable to that of patients with RA or AS.

Listing J, Strangfeld A, Kary S, Rau R, von Hinueber U, Stoyanova-Scholz M, Gromnica-Ihle E, Antoni C, Herzer P, Kekow J, Schneider M, Zink A. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Schumannstrasse 21/22, D-10117 Berlin, Germany. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16255017 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To estimate the incidence rates of serious and nonserious infections in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who start treatment with a biologic agent, and to compare these rates with those in patients with RA who receive conventional treatment. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the German biologics register between May 2001 and September 2003 were included. Treating rheumatologists assessed adverse events and serious adverse events. All adverse events and serious adverse events experienced within 12 months after study entry were analyzed. Propensity score methods were applied to estimate which part of a rate increase was likely to be attributable to differences in patient characteristics. RESULTS: Data were available for 512 patients receiving etanercept, 346 patients receiving infliximab, 70 patients receiving anakinra, and 601 control patients treated with disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. The total number of adverse events per 100 patient-years was 22.6 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 18.7-27.2) among patients receiving etanercept, 28.3 (95% CI 23.1-34.7) among patients receiving infliximab, and 6.8 (95% CI 5.0-9.4) among controls (P < 0.0001). Significant differences in the rate of serious adverse events were also observed. For patients receiving etanercept, those receiving infliximab, and controls, the total numbers of serious adverse events per 100 patient-years were 6.4 (95% CI 4.5-9.1), 6.2 (95% CI 4.0-9.5), and 2.3 (95% CI 1.3-3.9), respectively (P = 0.0016). After adjusting for differences in the case patient mix, the relative risks of serious adverse events were 2.2 (95% CI 0.9-5.4) for patients receiving etanercept and 2.1 (95% CI 0.8-5.5) for patients receiving infliximab, compared with controls. CONCLUSION: Patients treated with biologic agents have a higher a priori risk of infection. However, our data suggest that this risk is increased by treatment with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors.

Thiele K, Buttgereit F, Huscher D, Zink A, Anonymous00460. · German Rheumatism Research Centre, Berlin. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #16208641 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To describe the current use of glucocorticoids in German patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We analyzed clinical and patient-derived data from 10,068 outpatients with RA from the national database of the German Collaborative Arthritis Centres for the year 2001 collected by more than 80 rheumatologists in hospitals and private practices. RESULTS: Systemic glucocorticoid therapy was prescribed for 60% of all patients with RA in rheumatologic care. The proportion of patients receiving systemic glucocorticoids in addition to disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy ranged from 53% to 81% of the patients for the various DMARDs. Glucocorticoid therapy was administered more often in combination with tumor necrosis factor inhibitors (81%), cyclosporin A (80%), or leflunomide (77%) than with more traditional DMARDs such as methotrexate (63%) or sulfasalazine (55%). Regarding the prevention and treatment of osteoporosis, 63% of patients taking systemic glucocorticoids were also receiving some type of osteoporosis therapy, as opposed to only 26% of those not taking glucocorticoids. CONCLUSION: Glucocorticoids play a pivotal role in the management of RA. This is reflected in the extensive use of low-dose glucocorticoids by German rheumatologists. Even if highly effective DMARDs are prescribed, they are accompanied by glucocorticoids, at least in the initial phase. High-dose glucocorticoids are prescribed for only a small proportion of the patients. There is increasing awareness of the risk of osteoporosis in long-term glucocorticoid treatment, demonstrated by the fact that osteoporosis medication is prescribed for a large proportion of patients taking glucocorticoids.