Rheumatoid Arthritis: Westhovens R

Kay J, Westhovens R. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #19525405 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Westhovens R, Verschueren P. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Herestraat, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19007424 links to  free full text

Abstract: Currently available information from clinical trials and open-label extensions suggest that abatacept is a good alternative to other biologicals in rheumatoid arthritis. Although at first glance the efficacy of all biologicals appears to be the same, in routine practice one might expect there to be differences in effectiveness, safety profiles and specific patient-centered outcomes. These patient-centered outcomes, as well as safety, deserve further attention in follow-up registries, but also in prospective studies, if we are to optimize patient care. After failing a first tumor necrosis factor blocker, patients have several treatment options - starting a second tumor necrosis factor blocker, or rituximab or abatacept - but no formal randomized studies are available to indicate what is the optimal strategy. Potential differences between treatments with biologicals with different modes of action in very early disease also require more study. It is difficult to determine how co-stimulation blockade will influence Crohn's disease or psoriatic arthritis as well as other diseases characterized by a specific role of the adaptive immune system, such as systemic lupus erythematosus and multiple sclerosis. It is clear, however, that every additional targeted therapy creates new opportunities for treatment in many different patient populations.

Sibilia J, Westhovens R. · Rheumatology Department, Immunopathology Laboratory, Louis Pasteur University, Strasbourg, France. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17977488 No free full text.

Abstract: Abatacept selectively modulates the CD80/CD86:CD28 co-stimulatory signal required for full T-cell activation, and has been approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) in combination with methotrexate in a number of countries, including the United States, Canada, and the European Union. As with any new agent, it is important to assess the safety and tolerability of abatacept, and hence an integrated safety analysis of five randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind core abatacept clinical trials was performed. The 2,944 patients enrolled had active RA and were receiving a variety of biologic and non-biologic background disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Overall, 1,955 patients were treated with abatacept during the double-blind periods, and 2,688 during the cumulative double-blind and open-label periods (yielding 4764 patient-years of exposure in total). Overall frequencies of adverse events (AEs; 88.8% vs. 85.1%), serious AEs (SAEs14.0% vs. 12.5%) and malignancies (1.4% vs. 1.1%) were similar in abatacept- versus placebo-treated patients, respectively (regardless of the potential relationship to the study therapy). Discontinuations due to SAEs were 2.8% in the abatacept group vs. 1.6% in the placebo group. The frequency of serious infections was low overall (3.0% vs. 1.9% in abatacept- versus placebo-treated patients, respectively). Acute infusional AEs (9.8% vs. 6.7% in the abatacept versus placebo groups, respectively) were mostly mild-to-moderate in intensity. Safety data through cumulative exposure were consistent with those from the double-blind periods; there was no evidence of an increase in the incidence of serious infections or malignancies with increasing exposure to abatacept. Abatacept was associated with low levels of immunogenicity, with no detectable association between immunogenicity and safety or efficacy. Abatacept treatment did not result in a higher rate of seroconversion for anti-nuclear or anti-dsDNA antibodies versus placebo, and was associated with a similar frequency of autoimmune events versus placebo (1.4% vs. 1.8%, respectively). Moreover, treatment with abatacept may not markedly impair the response to vaccination in healthy volunteers or RA patients. Overall, these findings suggest that abatacept has acceptable safety and tolerability in patients with RA. Ongoing follow-up will monitor whether these features are maintained over long-term abatacept use.

Dequeker J, Esselens G, Westhovens R. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals K.U. Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. · Clin Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16609822 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Dequeker J, Westhovens R, Luyten FP. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals, KU Leuven, Belgium. · Front Horm Res. · Pubmed #11892257 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Westhovens R, Dequeker J. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals KU Leuven, Pellenberg, Belgium. · Z Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10769433 No free full text.

Abstract: Some controversial issues in the current literature in relation to osteoporosis and rheumatoid arthritis are updated and discussed. Because most studies agree that osteoporosis in postmenopausal women and in men with RA is more evident at the hip and radius than at the spine, and that the most important determinants of bone loss are disability, local disease activity, and cumulative corticosteroid dose, osteoporosis is not a common systemic extra-articular manifestation of RA. In early arthritis, periarticular osteoporosis does indeed reflect disease activity because it is closely related to the acute phase reactants, but once periarticular osteoporosis is established it is no longer a marker of disease severity. The threshold dose for corticosteroid-induced osteoporotic fractures is the cumulative rather than the actual dose. Statements based on quantitative tomography concerning the acute effects (and their reversal) of corticosteroids on bone have to be interpreted with care because of important body composition changes, in particular in bone marrow fat, during corticosteroid treatment. At present there is no evidence that anti-resorbing drugs can change the progress of RA erosions, probably because erosions are the result of non-osteoclast mediated mechanisms. Stress fractures in RA are underdiagnosed and are often confused with synovitis, and therefore it is likely that they are more frequent than commonly thought, especially in the lower limbs. Methotrexate osteopathy is known in oncological practice. Whether low dose methotrexate is toxic for bone is not clear, but a number of clinical observations suggest that the occurrence of spontaneous fractures and lower extremity pain is more frequent in methotrexate treated patients than expected. Prospective studies are necessary to confirm these impressions.

Westhovens R, Kremer JM, Moreland LW, Emery P, Russell AS, Li T, Aranda R, Becker JC, Qi K, Dougados M. · Department of Rheumatology, KU Leuven, Herestraat 49, B 3000 Leuven, Belgium. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19273451 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of abatacept plus methotrexate (MTX) over 5 years in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: Patients were randomized to abatacept 10 or 2 mg/kg or placebo, plus MTX. Patients completing the 1-year, double-blind period entered the longterm extension, where all patients received a fixed dose of abatacept ~10 mg/kg. We describe safety analyses for all patients who received at least 1 dose of abatacept and efficacy analyses for the original ~10 mg/kg abatacept-treated group, over 5 years. RESULTS: Of the 235 abatacept- or placebo-treated patients completing the double-blind period, 219 entered the longterm extension; 130 (59.4%) were continuing at Year 5. No unexpected safety events were observed during the longterm extension compared with the double-blind period. Incidence rates of adverse events (AE) and serious AE were 489.7 and 20.0/100 patient-years in Year 1 versus 374.9 and 18.9/100 patient-years in the cumulative period, respectively. Using exploratory analyses, improvements observed at Year 1 in the 10 mg/kg group were maintained at Year 5, as assessed by ACR responses (ACR20=77.1% vs 82.7%; ACR50=53.0% vs 65.4%; ACR70=28.9% vs 40.4% at Years 1 and 5, respectively) and disease activity (Low Disease Activity State=48.2% vs 58.5%; Disease Activity Score-28-defined remission=25.3% vs 45.3% at Years 1 and 5, respectively). CONCLUSION: Abatacept maintained the efficacy observed at Year 1 over 5 years of treatment, and demonstrated consistent safety and tolerability. These data, along with relatively high retention rates, support the longterm clinical benefit provided by selective T cell costimulation modulation. Clinical trial registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; clinical trial registration number: NCT00254293.

Esselens G, Westhovens R, Verschueren P. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospital Leuven, Belgium. · Musculoskeletal Care. · Pubmed #18618520 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To investigate the effectiveness of an integrated care programme in daily practice compared with present-day standard care for ambulatory early rheumatoid arthritis patients. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, group A received programmed multidisciplinary outpatient care and group B standard rheumatologist-centred care. Demographics, disease duration, initial and actual treatment, disease activity (Disease Activity-28 Score), general health (Short Form-36 [SF-36]), functionality (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]), coping style (Utrecht's Coping List), illness perception (Dutch-Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire) and satisfaction about care were recorded. RESULTS: Eight-nine patients were included in group A and 102 in group B. Demographics, rheumatoid factor, antibodies against cyclic citrullinated peptides and disease duration were comparable. More patients in group A received initial combination therapy (35% versus 3%). Actual treatment regimens were comparable. More patients were in remission (69% versus 39%) or had low disease activity (80% versus 60%), mean HAQ-scores were lower (0.52 versus 0.80), more patients had no functional impairment (38% versus 15%) and SF-36 scores were higher in group A. Coping style and illness perception were similar, except for illness coherence. Satisfaction differed only for aspects typically favouring a care programme. Participation in a care programme independently predicted remission and absence of disability in a regression model, including gender and initial treatment as other predictors. CONCLUSION: Disease activity was better controlled and functionality and general health better preserved in patients following an outpatient care programme. This was partly due to the easier implementation of an intensive initial treatment strategy but apparently also to other aspects of organized pharmacological and non-pharmacological care, to be defined in randomized, controlled studies.

Li T, Gignac M, Wells G, Shen S, Westhovens R. · Global Epidemiology and Outcomes Research, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, New Jersey, USA. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #18498922 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: The aims of this study were to examine the relationship between external home help (EHH) use (ie, help provided by someone other than family or friends) and clinical response and patient-reported outcomes in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether abatacept treatment in addition to methotrexate reduces the need for EHH. METHODS: EHH use was recorded monthly in the Abatacept in Inadequate responders to Methotrexate (AIM) trial, a 12-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of abatacept in patients with active RA also receiving methotrexate. Clinical response was defined using American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) criteria, and Disease Activity Scale (DAS)-28 score. Patient-reported outcomes included the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), 100-mm visual analog scales (VASs) for pain and fatigue, and the Medical Outcomes Study 36-item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36) for health-related quality of life. Analysis of covariance and regression analysis were performed to investigate the relationship between change in EHH use and both clinical response and patient-reported outcomes. RESULTS: Of 590 patients enrolled in the study, 232 (39.3%) were receiving EHH at baseline (mean age, 50.2 years; 88% female; 85% white; mean duration of RA, 8.8 years; mean [SD] EHH use, 15.6 [11.3] days). The level of EHH use was consistently higher with poorer scores on the HAQ, pain and fatigue VASs, DAS28, and SF-36. At 12 months, the mean reduction from baseline in EHH use was significantly greater in patients with ACR-50 or ACR-70 clinical response, EULAR good or moderate response, DAS28 remission, and clinically meaningful improvements in patient-reported outcomes. On multiple regression analysis, change in SF-36 Physical Functioning subscale score was the most important contributor to change in EHH after adjustment for other variables. The mean reduction from baseline in EHH use was significantly greater with abatacept compared with placebo over the study period (all, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In this exploratory analysis of data from patients with active RA from the AIM trial, EHH use was decreased significantly with improvements in clinical response, disease activity, and patient-reported outcomes. Treatment with abatacept in addition to methotrexate was associated with significantly decreased EHH use, suggesting that abatacept may have been associated with improved function and increased physical independence in these patients with RA.

Kremer JM, Genant HK, Moreland LW, Russell AS, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C, Szechiński J, Li T, Teng J, Becker JC, Westhovens R. · Center for Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, Albany, New York 12206, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18383390 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, radiographic changes, and safety of abatacept and methotrexate therapy through 2 years in a long-term extension of a previously published 1-year study. METHODS: Patients who received placebo during year 1 were switched to abatacept. Patients taking abatacept continued to take it. Efficacy and safety were assessed through 2 years. RESULTS: Of 539 patients enrolled in the initial 1-year study, 488 completed 1 year of the long-term extension (2% discontinued for lack of efficacy). At 2 years, patients taking abatacept had maintained their responses on the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria and the Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28; using the C-reactive protein [CRP] level), as well as their physical function (according to the Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] disability index [DI]) and health-related quality of life (HRQOL; assessed with the Short Form 36 [SF-36] health survey), that were observed at the end of the double-blind period (year 1 versus year 2 values were 81.9% versus 80.3% for ACR 20% improvement, 25.4% versus 30.9% for a DAS28 [CRP] of <2.6, 71.8% versus 66.8% for the HAQ DI, and 9.7 versus 10.6 and 7.3 versus 7.2, respectively, for the mean change in the physical and mental components summary scores of the SF-36). In the abatacept group, post hoc analysis demonstrated further inhibition of radiographic progression during year 2 (57% reduction in mean change of total score in year 2 versus year 1; P<0.0001), and minimal radiographic progression was observed (mean change in total score from baseline was 1.1 and 1.6 at year 1 and 2, respectively). Rates of adverse events (AEs) and severe AEs were consistent throughout the cumulative period. CONCLUSION: The improvements in signs and symptoms, physical function, and HRQOL observed after 1 year of abatacept treatment were maintained through 2 years of treatment. This durability was accompanied by a safety profile consistent with that in the double-blind portion of the study. Radiographic progression was further inhibited in year 2 compared with year 1, suggesting an increasing effect of abatacept on the inhibition of structural damage in year 2.

Vera-Llonch M, Massarotti E, Wolfe F, Shadick N, Westhovens R, Sofrygin O, Maclean R, Yuan Y, Oster G. · Policy Analysis Inc., Brookline, MA 02445, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #18356179 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess cost-effectiveness of abatacept in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX. METHODS: We developed a simulation model to depict progression of disability [in terms of the HAQ Disability Index (HAQ-DI)] in women aged 55-64 yrs with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX. At model entry, patients were assumed to receive either only MTX or MTX plus abatacept. Patients were then tracked from model entry until death. Future health-state utilities and medical-care costs (except study therapy) were estimated based on predicted values of the HAQ-DI. The model was estimated using data from a Phase III clinical trial of abatacept plus various secondary sources. Cost-effectiveness was expressed in terms of incremental cost (2006 US$) per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained over alternatively 10 yrs and a lifetime. Costs and health effects were both discounted at 3% annually. RESULTS: Over 10 yrs, abatacept would yield 1.2 additional QALYs (undiscounted) per patient (4.6 vs 3.4 for MTX) at an incremental (discounted) cost of $51,426 ($103,601 vs $52,175, respectively); over a lifetime, corresponding figures were 2.0 QALYS (6.8 vs 4.8) and $67,757 ($147,853 vs $80,096). Cost-effectiveness was [mean (95% CI)] $47,910 ($44,641, $52,136) per QALY gained over 10 yrs and $43,041 ($39,070, $46,725) per QALY gained over a lifetime. Findings were robust in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSION: Abatacept is cost-effective by current standards of medical practice in patients with moderately to severely active RA and inadequate response to MTX.

Han C, Rahman MU, Doyle MK, Bathon JM, Smolen J, Kavanaugh A, Westhovens R, St Clair EW, Baker D, Bala M. · Centocor Research and Development Inc., 200 Great Valley Parkway, Malvern, PA 19355, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17937474 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the relationship between hemoglobin concentration and physical disability in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Data were derived from 2495 patients with RA enrolled in 3 clinical trials (ATTRACT, ASPIRE, and START) and treated with infliximab (3 to 10 mg/kg) plus methotrexate (MTX), or MTX plus placebo. The association of hemoglobin and the Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score was assessed at baseline (n = 2471) and Week 22 (n = 2458) by Spearman correlation, and multivariate linear regression models were employed to control for confounding effects from demographic and other clinical variables. A logistic regression model was used to estimate the odds ratio (OR) for a clinically meaningful improvement (> or = 0.25 point increase) in HAQ associated with a > or = 1 g/dl improvement in hemoglobin from baseline at Week 22. RESULTS: About 37% of patients with RA had anemia based on World Health Organization criteria: hemoglobin < 12 g/dl in women (39%) and < 13 g/dl in men (32%). Low hemoglobin level was significantly associated with more severe physical disability at baseline (p < 0.001), and both male and female patients with anemia had more severe disability at baseline. Improvement in hemoglobin after treatment at Week 22 was an independent contributor to improvement in HAQ, and a > or = 1 g/dl improvement in hemoglobin after treatment was associated with a clinically meaningful improvement in the HAQ score at Week 22 (OR 1.43, 95% CI 1.10-1.86; p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Anemia is one of the independent factors contributing to physical disability in patients with RA. Improvement in anemia following effective RA treatment may play an independent role in improving physical function.

Kremer JM, Genant HK, Moreland LW, Russell AS, Emery P, Abud-Mendoza C, Szechinski J, Li T, Ge Z, Becker JC, Westhovens R. · Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York, USA. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #16785475 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: The selective co-stimulation modulator abatacept demonstrated efficacy for treating rheumatoid arthritis in early clinical studies. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effects of abatacept in patients with persistent, active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. DESIGN: One-year, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial (November 2002 to October 2004). SETTING: 116 centers worldwide. PATIENTS: 652 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate treatment. INTERVENTION: Once-monthly infusion of a fixed dose of abatacept, approximately 10 mg/kg of body weight, or placebo. MEASUREMENTS: Co-primary end points were a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology (ACR) response criteria (ACR 20) at 6 months, clinically meaningful improvements in physical function, and change from baseline in joint erosion score at 1 year. RESULTS: Four hundred thirty-three and 219 patients were randomly assigned to abatacept or placebo, respectively, and 385 (89%) and 162 (74%), respectively, completed 1 year of treatment. In a modified intention-to-treat analysis, 6-month ACR 20, ACR 50, and ACR 70 responses were 67.9% for abatacept versus 39.7% for placebo (difference, 28.2 percentage points [95% CI, 19.8 to 36.7 percentage points]), 39.9% for abatacept versus 16.8% for placebo (difference, 23.0 percentage points [CI, 15.0 to 31.1 percentage points]), and 19.8% for abatacept versus 6.5% for placebo (difference, 13.3 percentage points [CI, 7.0 to 19.5 percentage points]), respectively. At 1 year, the responses increased to 73.1% for abatacept versus 39.7% for placebo (difference, 33.4 percentage points [CI, 25.1 to 41.7 percentage points]), 48.3% for abatacept versus 18.2% for placebo (difference, 30.1 percentage points [CI, 21.8 to 38.5 percentage points]), and 28.8% for abatacept versus 6.1% for placebo (difference, 22.7 percentage points [CI, 15.6 to 29.8 percentage points]), respectively (P < 0.001 for all). Physical function significantly improved in 63.7% versus 39.3% of patients (P < 0.001). At 1 year, abatacept statistically significantly slowed the progression of structural joint damage compared with placebo. Abatacept-treated patients had a similar incidence of adverse events (87.3% vs. 84.0%; difference, 3.3 percentage points [CI, -2.5 to 9.1 percentage points]) and a higher incidence of prespecified serious infections (2.5% vs. 0.9%; difference, 1.6 percentage points [CI, -0.3 to 3.6 percentage points]) and infusion reactions (acute, 8.8% vs. 4.1%; difference, 4.7 percentage points [CI, 0.9 to 8.4 percentage points]; peri-infusional, 24.5% vs. 16.9%; difference, 7.6 percentage points [CI, 1.2 to 14.0 percentage points]) compared with placebo recipients. LIMITATIONS: The study involved only 1 group of patients over 1 year. CONCLUSIONS: Abatacept statistically significantly reduced disease activity in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and an inadequate response to methotrexate. Longer treatment in different patient populations is needed to establish its appropriate role in rheumatoid arthritis.

Westhovens R, Houssiau F, Joly J, Everitt DE, Zhu Y, Sisco D, Van Hartingsveldt B, Mascelli MA, Graham MA, Durez P, Bouman-Thio E. · No affiliation provided · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16583466 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To assess safety, clinical response, and pharmacokinetics of subcutaneous (SC) and intramuscular (IM) doses of an experimental formulation of infliximab [including experimental SC doses following administration of commercially-formulated intravenous (IV) infliximab] in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) refractory to methotrexate. METHODS: In this randomized, open-label, 3-stage design, 43 subjects were enrolled in 7 dose groups. In Stage I, 15 subjects received single SC doses of 0.5, 1.5, or 3.0 mg/kg. In Stage II, 21 subjects received one of 3 regimens: 100 mg SC every 2 weeks (3 injections); 3 mg/kg commercially-formulated IV infliximab every 2 weeks (2 infusions) followed by 100 mg SC every 2 weeks (3 injections); or 100 mg IM every 2 weeks (3 injections). In Stage III, 7 subjects received 100 mg SC every 4 weeks (3 injections). RESULTS: No treatment-related serious adverse events were observed, and there were no serious injection site reactions. A low-titer infliximab antibody response was detected in 27% of subjects receiving single SC doses, 5% receiving multiple SC doses, and 43% receiving IM doses. SC administration yielded roughly dose-proportional increases in Cmax and AUC. American College of Rheumatology 20% response (ACR20) was achieved 2 weeks after the last injection by 86.7% of subjects receiving single SC doses, 85.7% receiving SC doses every 2 weeks, 85.7% receiving both IV and SC doses, 57.1% receiving multiple IM doses, and 80.0% receiving SC doses every 4 weeks. CONCLUSION: SC and IM treatment with this experimental infliximab formulation was well tolerated and was associated with a favorable ACR response.

Durez P, Nzeusseu Toukap A, Lauwerys BR, Manicourt DH, Verschueren P, Westhovens R, Devogelaer JP, Houssiau FA. · Rheumatology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, Université catholique de Louvain, Bruxelles, Belgium. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #15308515 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To compare the short term clinical and biological effects of intravenous (i.v.) pulse methylprednisolone (MP) and infliximab (IFX) in patients with severe active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate (MTX) treatment. METHODS: Patients with active RA despite MTX treatment were randomly allocated to receive a single i.v. infusion of MP (1 g) or three i.v. infusions of IFX (3 mg/kg) on weeks 0, 2, and 6. Patients were "blindly" evaluated for disease activity measures. Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated through the SF-36 health survey. Serum matrix metalloproteinase-3 (MMP-3) titres were measured at baseline, weeks 2 and 6. RESULTS: Compared with baseline, significant improvement was noted in all activity measures, including serum C reactive protein (CRP) titres, in the IFX group only. At week 14, 6/9 (67%) and 4/9 (44%) IFX patients met the ACR20 and 50 response criteria, while this was the case in only 1/12 (8%) and 0/12 (0%) MP patients, respectively (p<0.05). None of the QoL scales improved with MP treatment, whereas some did so in the IFX group. Serum MMP-3 titres significantly decreased (41% drop) at week 6 in the IFX group, while no changes were seen in patients given MP. CONCLUSION: This short term randomised comparative study demonstrates that TNF blockade is better than MP pulse therapy in a subset of patients with severe refractory RA, with improvement in not only clinical parameters of disease activity but also biological inflammatory indices, such as serum CRP and MMP-3 titres.

Kremer JM, Westhovens R, Leon M, Di Giorgio E, Alten R, Steinfeld S, Russell A, Dougados M, Emery P, Nuamah IF, Williams GR, Becker JC, Hagerty DT, Moreland LW. · Center for Rheumatology, Albany, NY 12206, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #14614165 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Effective new therapies are needed for rheumatoid arthritis. Current therapies target the products of activated macrophages; however, T cells also have an important role in rheumatoid arthritis. A fusion protein--cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated antigen 4-IgG1 (CTLA4Ig)--is the first in a new class of drugs known as costimulation blockers being evaluated for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. CTLA4Ig binds to CD80 and CD86 on antigen-presenting cells, blocking the engagement of CD28 on T cells and preventing T-cell activation. A preliminary study showed that CTLA4Ig may be effective for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. METHODS: We randomly assigned patients with active rheumatoid arthritis despite methotrexate therapy to receive 2 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram of body weight (105 patients), 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram (115 patients), or placebo (119 patients) for six months. All patients also received methotrexate therapy during the study. The clinical response was assessed at six months with use of the criteria of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR), which define the response according to its extent: 20 percent (ACR 20), 50 percent (ACR 50), or 70 percent (ACR 70). Additional end points included measures of the health-related quality of life. RESULTS: Patients treated with 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram were more likely to have an ACR 20 than were patients who received placebo (60 percent vs. 35 percent, P<0.001). Significantly higher rates of ACR 50 and ACR 70 responses were seen in both CTLA4Ig groups than in the placebo group. The group given 10 mg of CTLA4Ig per kilogram had clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in all eight subscales of the Medical Outcomes 36-Item Short-Form General Health Survey. CTLA4Ig was well tolerated, with an overall safety profile similar to that of placebo. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who were receiving methotrexate, treatment with CTLA4Ig significantly improved the signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis and the health-related quality of life. CTLA4Ig is a promising new therapy for rheumatoid arthritis.

Landewé RB, Boers M, Verhoeven AC, Westhovens R, van de Laar MA, Markusse HM, van Denderen JC, Westedt ML, Peeters AJ, Dijkmans BA, Jacobs P, Boonen A, van der Heijde DM, van der Linden S. · Department of Internal Medicine/Rheumatology, PO Box 5800, University Hospital Maastricht, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11840436 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: The Combinatietherapie Bij Reumatoide Artritis (COBRA) trial demonstrated that step-down combination therapy with prednisolone, methotrexate, and sulfasalazine (SSZ) was superior to SSZ monotherapy for suppressing disease activity and radiologic progression of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The current study was conducted to investigate whether the benefits of COBRA therapy were sustained over time, and to determine which baseline factors could predict outcome. METHODS: All patients had participated in the 56-week COBRA trial. During followup, they were seen by their own rheumatologists and were also assessed regularly by study nurses; no treatment protocol was specified. Disease activity, radiologic damage, and functional ability were the primary outcome domains. Two independent assessors scored radiographs in sequence according to the Sharp/van der Heijde method. Outcomes were analyzed by generalized estimating equations on the basis of intent-to-treat, starting with data obtained at the last visit of the COBRA trial (56 weeks after baseline). RESULTS: At the beginning of followup, patients in the COBRA group had a significantly lower mean time-averaged 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) and a significantly lower median radiologic damage (Sharp) score compared with those in the SSZ monotherapy group. The functional ability score (Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ]) was similar in both groups. During the 4-5 year followup period, the time-averaged DAS28 decreased 0.17 points per year in the SSZ group and 0.07 in the COBRA group. The Sharp progression rate was 8.6 points per year in the SSZ group and 5.6 in the COBRA group. After adjustment for differences in treatment and disease activity during followup, the between-group difference in the rate of radiologic progression was 3.7 points per year. The HAQ score did not change significantly over time. Independent baseline predictors of radiologic progression over time (apart from treatment allocation) were rheumatoid factor positivity, Sharp score, and DAS28. CONCLUSION: An initial 6-month cycle of intensive combination treatment that includes high-dose corticosteroids results in sustained suppression of the rate of radiologic progression in patients with early RA, independent of subsequent antirheumatic therapy.

Larsen A, Kvien TK, Schattenkirchner M, Rau R, Scott DL, Smolen JS, Rozman B, Westhovens R, Tikly M, Oed C, Rosenburg R, Anonymous00001. · Kongsvinger Sjukehus, Norway. · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #11469522 No free full text.

Abstract: Radiographic disease progression with leflunomide and sulfasalazine treatment was assessed in rheumatoid arthritis patients in a double-blind trial that was placebo controlled for the first 6 months. Completers at 6 months opted to continue on 12- and 24-month double-blind extensions; patients in the placebo group were switched to sulfasalazine. Changes in Larsen scores were assessed in evaluable patient cohorts at 6 (n=228), 12 (n=136), and 24 (n=65) months. Changes in Larsen scores and erosive joint counts with leflunomide and sulfasalazine at 6 months showed significantly less radiographic progression than placebo. Sustained retardation of radiographic progression was seen in the 24-month intent-to-treat cohorts (delta Larsen scores: leflunomide -0.07, sulfasalazine -0.03). Changes in erosive joint counts within the 24-month leflunomide cohort suggest halting of disease progression for patients who continued in the study for 2 years (leflunomide -0.92, sulfasalazine 0.80). Leflunomide was well tolerated with no unexpected adverse events during the 2-year period. This study demonstrates that slowing of disease progression with leflunomide, observed as early as 6 months, is maintained long term in patients who complete 2 years of treatment.

Wells G, Boers M, Shea B, Tugwell P, Westhovens R, Saurez-Almazor M, Buchbinder R. · University of Ottawa and Ottawa Hospital, Canada. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #9918267 No free full text.

Abstract: This is the initial report of the generic health OMERACT study concerned with the sensitivity to change of generic quality of life (QOL) measures. Our objective was to determine which QOL instrument is best able to show a statistically significant improvement in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) demonstrating relevant improvement in a core set of disease activity and disease-specific disability measures. A multicenter controlled trial of a single group with repeated measurements at 0 (baseline), 3, and 6 months was conducted. All participating centers recruited 10 patients with RA who were about to start methotrexate therapy for the first time because of active disease. Assessments included disease activity measures, disease-specific disability measures, and generic QOL measures. To date, 40 patients have been recruited from 4 centers for the study. After 6 months of treatment many of the generic QOL measures showed a 20% improvement from baseline and medium standardized response means around 0.5. In particular, the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) and the Rheumatoid Arthritis Quality of Life (RAQOL) measures had the largest percentage improvement (22 and 29%, respectively) and standardized response means (both with 0.54). Early results on the sensitivity of generic health QOL measures are promising, in particular for the NHP and RAQOL measures.

Teixeira VH, Pierlot C, Migliorini P, Balsa A, Westhovens R, Barrera P, Alves H, Vaz C, Fernandes M, Pascual-Salcedo D, Bombardieri S, Dequeker J, Radstake TR, Van Riel P, van de Putte L, Lopes-Vaz A, Bardin T, Prum B, Cornélis F, Petit-Teixeira E, Anonymous00058. · GenHotel-EA3886, Evry University - Paris 7 University Medical School, AutoCure European Consortium, Evry-Genopole, France. · Arthritis Res Ther. · Pubmed #19302705 links to  free full text

Abstract: INTRODUCTION: A candidate gene approach, in a large case-control association study in the Dutch population, has shown that a 480 kb block on chromosome 4q27 encompassing KIAA1109/Tenr/IL2/IL21 genes is associated with rheumatoid arthritis. Compared with case-control association studies, family-based studies have the added advantage of controlling potential differences in population structure. Therefore, our aim was to test this association in populations of European origin by using a family-based approach. METHODS: A total of 1,302 West European white individuals from 434 trio families were genotyped for the rs4505848, rs11732095, rs6822844, rs4492018 and rs1398553 polymorphisms using the TaqMan Allelic discrimination assay (Applied Biosystems). The genetic association analyses for each SNP and haplotype were performed using the Transmission Disequilibrium Test and the genotype relative risk. RESULTS: We observed evidence for association of the heterozygous rs4505848-AG genotype with rheumatoid arthritis (P = 0.04); however, no significance was found after Bonferroni correction. In concordance with previous findings in the Dutch population, we observed a trend of undertransmission for the rs6822844-T allele and rs6822844-GT genotype to rheumatoid arthritis patients. We further investigated the five SNP haplotypes of the KIAA1109/Tenr/IL2/IL21 gene region. We observed, as described in the Dutch population, a nonsignificant undertransmission of the AATGG haplotype to rheumatoid arthritis patients. CONCLUSIONS: Using a family-based study, we have provided a trend for the association of the KIAA1109/Tenr/IL2/IL21 gene region with rheumatoid arthritis in populations of European descent. Nevertheless, we failed to replicate a significant association of this region in our rheumatoid arthritis family sample. Further investigation of this region, including detection and testing of all variants, is required to confirm rheumatoid arthritis association.

Van den Bergh K, Hooijkaas H, Blockmans D, Westhovens R, Op De Beéck K, Verschueren P, Dufour D, van de Merwe JP, Fijak M, Klug J, Michiels G, Devogelaere B, De Smedt H, Derua R, Waelkens E, Blanckaert N, Bossuyt X. · Laboratory Medicine, Immunology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. · Clin Chem. · Pubmed #19264855 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Serum samples from patients with autoimmune connective tissue diseases that show a finely speckled antinuclear antibody (ANA) on indirect immune-fluorescence often have antibodies against unknown nuclear target antigens. To search for such autoantigens we applied a proteomic approach using sera from patients with a high ANA titer (>or=640) and finely speckled fluorescence but in whom no antibodies to extractable nuclear antigens (ENA) could be identified. METHODS: Using an immunoproteomics approach we identified heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein H1 (hnRNP H1) as a novel nuclear target of autoantibody response. RESULTS: Recombinant rat hnRNP H1 reacted in Western blot analyses with 48% of 93 sera from patients with primary Sjögren syndrome and with 5.2% of 153 sera from patients with other connective tissue diseases (diseased controls). For comparison, the diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of anti-Sjögren syndrome A (SSA) antibodies for primary Sjögren syndrome in the same patient cohort were 88.2% and 76.3%, respectively. Interestingly, 5 of 11 primary Sjögren syndrome patients with no anti-SSA or anti-SSB antibodies had anti-hnRNP H1 antibodies. Anti-hnRNP H1 antibodies were preabsorbed by hnRNP H1, as demonstrated by indirect immunofluorescence. In an evaluation of the presence of anti-hnRNP H1 antibodies in 188 consecutive samples submitted to the clinical laboratory with positive ANA (titer >or=160), anti-hnRNP H1 antibodies were found in 3 of 7 (2 primary and 5 secondary) Sjögren syndrome patients and in 8.3% of the diseased controls. CONCLUSIONS: HnRNP H1 is a newly discovered autoantigen that could become an additional diagnostic marker.

Geens E, Geusens P, Vanhoof J, Berghs H, Praet J, Esselens G, Lens S, Dufour JP, Vandenberghe M, Van Mullem X, Westhovens R, Verschueren P. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19254920 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To assess discrepancies between perception of Belgian rheumatologists on eligibility of RA patients for anti-TNF treatment and Belgian reimbursement criteria and to compare Belgian with Dutch criteria and UK guidelines. METHODS: Consecutive MTX-experienced patients with active RA were recruited from 25 private and academic rheumatology practices. Discrepancies between eligibility for anti-TNF treatment according to the rheumatologist and fulfillment of Belgian reimbursement criteria [HAQ > or =25%, tender joint count (TJC) and swollen joint count (SJC) > or =8; > or =1 erosion; failure of > or =2 DMARDs including MTX; no tuberculosis] were recorded. Reasons for failing the Belgian criteria and results of applying Dutch reimbursement criteria and UK guidelines on the dataset were analysed. RESULTS: Of 492 patients, rheumatologists considered 135 (27.4%) as eligible, whereas Belgian criteria were fulfilled for only 34 (6.9%). Positive predictive value (PPV) of rheumatologists' perception on eligibility for fulfillment of Belgian criteria was 22.9%, whereas negative predictive value (NPV) was 99.1%. The 104 patients (21.1%) considered eligible despite criteria not being fulfilled had significantly greater TJCs, SJCs, disease activity score (DAS28) and Rheumatoid Arthritis Disease Activity Index scores than the 385 patients (78.2%) in the no-discrepancy group. Number of swollen joints, HAQ and erosions mainly accounted for discrepancies. Of 492 patients, 263 (53.4%) qualified for Dutch criteria and 41 (8.3%) for UK guidelines. PPV of Belgian rheumatologists' perception was 72.6% for fulfilling Dutch criteria (NPV 49.6%) and 23.4% for UK guidelines (NPV 96.7%). CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatologists consider more RA patients eligible for anti-TNF treatment than would be reimbursed according to Belgian criteria. Dutch guidelines, based on DAS28, match more closely eligibility according to Belgian rheumatologists.

Verschueren P, Esselens G, Westhovens R. · Department of Rheumatology, University Hospitals, Leuven, Belgium. · Scand J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #19169906 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVES: To evaluate possible predictors of remission, normalized physical function, and work change in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: We determined in our early RA cohort the proportion of patients in remission [Disease Activity Score (DAS28)<2.6], with normalized function [Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) = 0], and with changed working situation since disease onset. Candidate predictors of remission, normalized function, and work change were studied by subgroup comparison and logistic regression analysis, including demographics, education, rheumatoid factor (RF), anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide (anti-CCP) antibodies, treatment, and DAS28, HAQ, pain and fatigue scores (on the visual analogue scale, VAS). RESULTS: Median (interquartile range, IQR) disease duration was 18 (29) months. Of 89 patients included, 69% were in remission. DAS28, HAQ, pain and fatigue scores of these patients were lower throughout year 1, although similar at baseline, compared to patients not in remission. At month 4, more of these patients were already good responders. Remission at month 4 independently predicted remission at follow-up. Thirty-eight per cent had no functional limitations; compared to patients with limitations, they had a lower baseline HAQ and lower DAS28, HAQ, pain and fatigue scores during year 1. At month 4, more achieved remission or HAQ = 0. Male sex, baseline HAQ, and month 4 good European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) response predicted long-term HAQ = 0, but month 4 HAQ = 0 was the strongest independent predictor. Of the 40% with a paid job at baseline, 43.8% reported changes in their work situation; they had higher DAS28, HAQ, pain and fatigue scores during year 1. Failing a month 4 good EULAR response independently predicted work change. CONCLUSION: Month 4 disease response predicts later remission, normalized physical function, and work change in RA.

Li T, Wells G, Westhovens R, Tugwell P. · Global Health Outcomes, P.O. Box 4000, Mail stop J23-02, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ 08543, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #19141573 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the Activity Participation Questionnaire (APaQ), a simple measure of activity participation for patients with RA. METHODS: The questionnaire contained two items: (i) number of days in the past month of being unable to perform one's usual activities because of RA; and (ii) a score measuring how often one's usual activities could be completed. The APaQ was administered to 1043 RA patients in two clinical trials of abatacept. Construct validity was evaluated by examining changes from baseline in activity scores by clinical response measured by the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) and ACR criteria and minimal disease activity (MDA) state and by correlations with patient-reported outcome measures of physical function, disease activity, pain and fatigue at study end-point. Internal consistency, test-retest reliability and sensitivity to change were assessed. RESULTS: Both activity participation items were significantly associated with levels of EULAR and ACR response and the achievement of MDA state (P < 0.0005 for all comparisons). Moderate correlations with patient-reported outcomes were consistently found (correlations 0.5-0.6). Cronbach's alpha was 0.7 indicating good internal consistency, the intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.6 suggesting acceptable test-retest reliability. Sensitivity to change was demonstrated by the treatment differences and the standardized response mean (0.39 and 0.30) for the two activity items. CONCLUSION: The APaQ is a simple, reliable and valid measure of patient activity, which is sensitive to change, suggesting its suitability for use in clinical trials.

Kurreeman FA, Rocha D, Houwing-Duistermaat J, Vrijmoet S, Teixeira VH, Migliorini P, Balsa A, Westhovens R, Barrera P, Alves H, Vaz C, Fernandes M, Pascual-Salcedo D, Michou L, Bombardieri S, Radstake T, van Riel P, van de Putte L, Lopes-Vaz A, Prum B, Bardin T, Gut I, Cornelis F, Huizinga TW, Petit-Teixeira E, Toes RE, Anonymous00030. · Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #18759306 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: We recently showed, using a candidate gene approach in a case-control association study, that a 65-kb block encompassing tumor necrosis factor receptor-associated factor 1 (TRAF1) and C5 is strongly associated with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Compared with case-control association studies, family-based studies have the added advantage of controlling potential differences in population structure and are not likely to be hampered by variation in population allele frequencies, as is seen for many genetic polymorphisms, including the TRAF1/C5 locus. The aim of this study was to confirm this association in populations of European origin by using a family-based approach. METHODS: A total of 1,356 western European white individuals from 452 "trio" families were genotyped for the rs10818488 polymorphism, using the TaqMan allelic discrimination assay. RESULTS: We observed evidence for association, demonstrating departure from Mendel's law, with an overtransmission of the rs10818488 A allele (A = 55%; P = 0.036). By taking into consideration parental phenotypes, we also observed an increased A allele frequency in affected versus unaffected parents (A = 64%; combined P = 0.015). Individuals carrying the A allele had a 1.2-fold increased risk of developing RA (allelic odds ratio 1.24, 95% confidence interval 1.04-1.50). CONCLUSION: Using a family-based study that is robust against population stratification, we provide evidence for the association of the TRAF1/C5 rs10818488 A allele and RA in populations of European descent, further substantiating our previous findings. Future functional studies should yield insight into the biologic relevance of this locus to the pathways involved in RA.