Rheumatoid Arthritis: Weinblatt ME

Smolen JS, Weinblatt ME. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #18854512 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Bijlsma JW, Weinblatt ME. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17934080 No free full text.

Abstract: The CAMERA study shows that using methotrexate in a tight control setting might lead to considerable improvement in disease activity in early rheumatoid arthritis See linked article p 1443.

Weinblatt ME. · No affiliation provided · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #16126790 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Pincus T, Gibofsky A, Weinblatt ME. · No affiliation provided · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11953958 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Furst DE, Breedveld FC, Kalden JR, Smolen JS, Burmester GR, Sieper J, Emery P, Keystone EC, Schiff MH, Mease P, van Riel PL, Fleischmann R, Weisman MH, Weinblatt ME. · David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA - RM 32-59, 1000 Veteran Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90025, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #17934088 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Weinblatt ME, Kuritzky L. · Harvard Medical School, Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA. · J Fam Pract. · Pubmed #17403322 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Todd DJ, Costenbader KH, Weinblatt ME. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Int J Clin Pract. · Pubmed #17313619 No free full text.

Abstract: Over the past decade, biological immunotherapy has revolutionised the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The most widely used of these therapies targets tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha). Approximately 20% of patients fail to respond to TNF-alpha antagonism, however, and a significant number of additional patients become refractory to anti-TNF-alpha therapy over time. Thus investigators have sought to target other pathogenic elements of RA using novel biological therapies. Abatacept is the first immunotherapy directed against the process of T-cell costimulation. Abatacept has shown clinical effectiveness in RA by improving disease activity, quality of life measures and radiographic progression of disease. In this article, we review the immunology of T-cell activation and costimulation, define the role of abatacept in this process, and discuss the clinical trials that led to the approval of abatacept as the latest biological therapy in RA in the USA and Canada. We also address the role of abatacept in the greater context of biological therapy for RA.

Cabral D, Katz JN, Weinblatt ME, Ting G, Avorn J, Solomon DH. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #15696560 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To develop a set of indicators for assessing the severity of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) through medical records. METHODS: A list of 47 potential indicators of RA was reviewed by an expert Delphi panel of 6 rheumatologists. The Delphi method is a formal approach for gathering expert opinion. The 47 potential indicators included items from the following 5 categories: radiologic and laboratory findings, clinical and functional status measures, extraarticular manifestations, prior surgical history, and medications. The panelists rated the potential indicators' relationship to RA disease severity. Each panelist rated each indicator on a scale of 0-6, in which 0 indicated no relationship at all with severe RA and 6 indicated a perfect relationship with severe RA. After a baseline set of ratings, a literature review was distributed to the panelists along with the panel's initial mean ratings and the ranges. The panelists then met to discuss the literature and rerate all indicators. RESULTS: After repeat ratings and review of relevant literature, the panel rated 28 of 47 (60%) potential indicators as having a strong or very strong relationship to severe RA. These 28 indicators were drawn from all 5 categories of potential indicators. There was agreement among the panelists on ratings for 41 of 47 indicators. Agreement was defined as a range of scores among the panelists </=3. CONCLUSION: A Delphi panel of rheumatologists agreed that data generally available in medical records may serve as potential indicators of severe RA.

Weinblatt ME. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Rheumatology-Immunology-Allergy, Arthritis Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass 02115, USA. · Cleve Clin J Med. · Pubmed #15195775 links to  free full text

Abstract: As recently as 10 years ago, many patients with rheumatoid arthritis would receive only a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and low-dose corticosteroids until damage to their joints was documented. Now, despite risks of toxicity and adverse effects, a disease-modifying antirheumatic drug such as methotrexate is given as early as possible to retard disease progression and help prevent new erosions. Other agents can be added to or used in place of methotrexate, such as a biologic response modifier that regulates the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha.

Weinblatt ME. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Ann Rheum Dis. · Pubmed #14532160 links to  free full text

This publication has no abstract.

Lee DM, Weinblatt ME. · Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, 75 Francis Street, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · Lancet. · Pubmed #11567728 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis is a systemic inflammatory disorder that mainly affects the diarthrodial joint. It is the most common form of inflammatory arthritis, and has a substantial societal effect in terms of cost, disability, and lost productivity. Although the pathogenesis of rheumatoid arthritis remains incompletely understood, much insight into the cellular and molecular mechanisms involved has been gained in the past decade. On the basis of these insights, new therapies have been developed, and clinical trials have shown the efficacy of aggressive treatment of patients with active disease. In this review, we discuss improvements in our understanding of the pathophysiology of inflammatory synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis, and improvements in therapy for patients with the disorder. The past decade has seen substantial advances in these areas. Future studies will be directed at improving methods for early diagnosis and identification of patients with progressive disease, and at improving methods to identify candidates for subclasses of disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs). Long-term safety and efficacy data for the new DMARD agents and combination regimens will also further delineate efficacy and toxicity and thus the appropriate clinical context for use of these therapeutic approaches. The continuing elucidation of pathophysiological pathways relevant in rheumatoid arthritis, coupled with continuing advances in biotechnology and rational drug design, offer substantial hope for the continued development of increasingly potent and specific pharmacotherapy for treatment of rheumatoid arthritis.

Weinblatt ME. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham & Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston 02115, USA. · Rheumatology (Oxford). · Pubmed #10646485 No free full text.

Abstract: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is a serious, chronic, debilitating disease for which no cure is available. Therapeutic aims for patients with RA are to alleviate symptoms, slow disease progression and optimize quality of life. In recent years, measures to achieve these goals have changed, and the development of new drugs will probably result in new treatment regimens. Two drugs with an extensive record of clinical experience are methotrexate and cyclosporin. Methotrexate is widely used because of its efficacy and high therapy retention rate. Both drugs have been shown to slow the progression of RA, but not without side-effects that sometimes preclude their use. As neither drug generally induces remission, improved treatments are needed. Combination therapy using drugs with different mechanisms of action is beginning to be evaluated, as are biological response modifiers targeted to specific mediators of the immune response. The future treatment of RA should provide more effective relief with fewer side-effects.

Weinblatt ME, Abbott GF, Koreishi AF. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology, and Allergy, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #19387019 No free full text.

This publication has no abstract.

Parker A, Izmailova ES, Narang J, Badola S, Le T, Roubenoff R, Ginsburg GS, Maier A, Coblyn JS, Shadick NA, Weinblatt ME. · Millennium Pharmaceuticals Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #17696278 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate peripheral blood expression of genes regulated by nuclear factor-kappaB (NF-kappaB), a key mediator of tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) signaling, in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) before and during treatment with anti-TNF-alpha or methotrexate (MTX). We analyzed association of gene expression with disease activity, rheumatoid factor (RF), age, sex, disease duration, treatment modality, and clinical response. METHODS: Sixty patients consented for RNA analysis at baseline and after 2 and 6 weeks of treatment. Disease activity was quantified using Disease Activity Score (DAS28) and C-reactive protein (CRP). Expression of 67 TNF-alpha-responsive, NF-kappaB-regulated genes was measured using Affymetrix arrays and RT-PCR. RESULTS: Expression of 34 genes was associated with DAS28-CRP, notably S100A12/calgranulin C, IL7R, and aquaporin 3. No association was observed with age, sex, RF, or disease duration. Expression of 16 genes changed in a manner that differed significantly between treatment groups. Eleven were reduced in anti-TNF-alpha-treated patients relative to MTX, while 5 were increased. The majority of these observations were confirmed using RT-PCR. Gene expression was not associated significantly with change in disease activity. CONCLUSION: NF-kappaB-dependent gene expression in peripheral leukocytes is highly correlated with RA activity as measured by DAS28-CRP. Expression of many genes responds differentially to anti-TNF-alpha versus MTX, suggesting fundamentally different effects on the NF-kappaB pathway. This peripheral blood expression signature provides candidate markers that could lead to development of a simple, minimally invasive pharmacodynamic assay for RA treatments directed at the NF-kappaB pathway. Combination of gene expression data with clinical scores and serum markers may provide more sensitive and predictive measures of RA disease activity.

Benito-Garcia E, Heller JE, Chibnik LB, Maher NE, Matthews HM, Bilics JA, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA. · Division of Rheumatology, Immunology and Allergy, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · J Rheumatol. · Pubmed #16821266 No free full text.

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: Methylxanthines, like caffeine, have been thought to reverse the antiinflammatory effects of methotrexate (MTX) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We investigated whether patients with RA taking MTX with a higher dietary caffeine intake have a worse clinical response to MTX than those with a lower intake. METHODS: Patients with RA enrolled in a prospective cohort study and currently taking MTX were divided equally into low, moderate, and high caffeine consumers. MTX clinical response was defined by the Disease Activity Score (DAS)28, Multidimensional Health Assessment Questionnaire (MDHAQ) score, and duration of morning stiffness. Regression models were used to study the relationship between caffeine intake and MTX response adjusting for age, sex, and other relevant variables at study enrollment. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-four patients with RA taking MTX had an average caffeine intake of 211.7 mg and average MTX dose of 16.0 mg/wk. The low caffeine group comprised 87 patients, the moderate 86, and the high 91. In 3 multivariate models, there was no statistical difference in MTX efficacy between groups, as measured by DAS28 score, MDHAQ score, and duration of morning stiffness at study enrollment. Moderate and high caffeine group had higher DAS28 scores, physician's global assessment, and swollen joint counts, but differences were not significant. CONCLUSION: Caffeine intake among patients taking high doses of MTX for RA did not affect MTX efficacy and RA disease activity over time.

Weisman MH, Moreland LW, Furst DE, Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Paulus HE, Teoh LS, Velagapudi RB, Noertersheuser PA, Granneman GR, Fischkoff SA, Chartash EK. · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, California 90048, USA. · Clin Ther. · Pubmed #12860493 No free full text.

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Because traditional therapies for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) such as methotrexate (MTX) do not produce an adequate response in many patients, newer therapies that block the proinflammatory cytokine tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-alpha) are increasingly being used in combination with MTX. OBJECTIVE: This study evaluated the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and safety profile of adalimumab, a fully human anti-TNF alpha monoclonal antibody, when added to continuing MTX therapy. METHODS: This Phase I, randomized, dose-titration study consisted of a 4-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled treatment phase and a 26-month, open-label continuation phase. Patients with RA who had been taking stable doses of MTX (mean dose, 17 mg/wk) for > or =3 months before enrollment with an inadequate response were randomly assigned to receive 2 single doses of either adalimumab 0.25, 0.5, 1, 3, or 5 mg/kg i.v. or placebo in the double-blind phase. In the open-label phase, patients received treatment with 1 of the doses of adalimumab every other week or monthly for 18 months; patients were then switched to adalimumab 40 mg i.v. or SC every other week or monthly. The main efficacy end point was 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology response criteria (ACR20). Other efficacy end points included 50% (ACR50) and 70% improvements in ACR response criteria. Pharmacokinetic parameters were analyzed for adalimumab and MTX during both phases of the study. Serum adalimumab concentrations were analyzed using a validated enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay relying on the double-antigen principle. Peak and trough concentrations were determined from observed concentration-time data, and a modeling approach was used to estimate total serum clearance, mean apparent terminal half-life, apparent volume of distribution at steady state, and area under the concentration-time curve. RESULTS: Sixty patients entered the double-blind phase, 45 receiving adalimumab and 15 receiving placebo; 1 placebo recipient chose not to continue into the open-label phase. Overall, the study population included 47 (78.3%) women and 13 (21.7%) men. The mean age was 52.9 years (range, 24-73 years), and the mean body weight was 69.7 kg (range, 43-98 kg). ACR20 and ACR50 responses were achieved on at least 1 assessment during the 4-week double-blind phase by a respective 29 (64.4%) and 11 (24.4%) of 45 patients receiving active treatment and by 4 (26.7%) and none of the 15 patients receiving placebo. Responses to adalimumab were rapid, with 10 (22.2%) of 45 patients achieving an ACR20 response within 24 hours of dosing. Of 29 adalimumab recipients who had an ACR20 response, 18 (62.1%) had a duration of response (time from first occurrence of a response to first occurrence of a nonresponse) of 1 to 2 weeks, and 11 (37.9%) had a duration of response of 3 to 13 weeks. The pharmacokinetic properties of adalimumab appeared to be linear. The mean apparent terminal half-life after a single intravenous dose of adalimumab ranged from 15 to 19 days in the 5 dose groups. Repeated administration of adalimumab had no statistically significant effect on the pharmacokinetics of MTX, indicating that dose adjustment of MTX is not necessary. Adalimumab was well tolerated, and there were no dose-related adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with active RA who had not had an adequate response to MTX, addition of adalimumab to MTX achieved statistically significant, long-term improvement compared with placebo plus MTX (P < or = 0.05), as indicated by ACR responses at 26 months. The combination was well tolerated. Adalimumab exhibited linear pharmacokinetics. In this selected patient population, adalimumab's long half-life of 15 to 19 days supports every-other-week dosing. Coadministration of adalimumab did not alter serum levels of MTX.

Kremer JM, Weinblatt ME, Bankhurst AD, Bulpitt KJ, Fleischmann RM, Jackson CG, Atkins KM, Feng A, Burge DJ. · The Center for Rheumatology, Albany, New York 12206, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12794815 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To observe the long-term safety and efficacy of combination therapy with etanercept and methotrexate in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), and to determine whether the addition of etanercept allowed reductions in methotrexate or corticosteroid dosages while maintaining a clinical response. METHODS: Patients with RA who received methotrexate plus etanercept in a previous randomized, placebo-controlled trial were offered the opportunity to enroll in an open-label extension study for further evaluation of treatment with etanercept and methotrexate. RESULTS: Seventy-nine of the 89 patients in the original blinded study enrolled in the extension study, and 65 of these patients continue in the study. Patients have received etanercept therapy for up to 47 months (median 44 months). The types and rate of adverse events noted during the extension trial were similar to those observed in the controlled trial. At the 3-year assessment, 77% of the 57 patients available for evaluation met American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) criteria for improvement in RA, 47% met the ACR50 criteria, and 23% met the ACR70 criteria. Of the 36 patients assessed at 3 years in the extension study, 30 (83%) were able to decrease their dosages of corticosteroids, and 20 (56%) were able to discontinue corticosteroid therapy. At 3 years, the dosage of methotrexate was decreased in 41 of 66 patients (62%), and methotrexate therapy was discontinued in 19 patients (29%). CONCLUSION: In this observational continuation study, the addition of etanercept to background methotrexate provided sustained clinical benefit over a median period of 44 months. With etanercept therapy, there were trends toward dosage reduction or discontinuation of methotrexate and corticosteroids, without apparent worsening of ACR response rates. Compared with the controlled trial, no increases in the rate of adverse events were observed.

Weinblatt ME, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Moreland LW, Weisman MH, Birbara CA, Teoh LA, Fischkoff SA, Chartash EK. · Rheumatology and Immunology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12528101 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of adalimumab (D2E7), a fully human monoclonal tumor necrosis factor alpha antibody, in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite treatment with MTX. METHODS: In a 24-week, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 271 patients with active RA were randomly assigned to receive injections of adalimumab (20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg subcutaneously) or placebo every other week while continuing to take their long-term stable dosage of MTX. The primary efficacy end point was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for 20% improvement (ACR20) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: An ACR20 response at week 24 was achieved by a significantly greater proportion of patients in the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab plus MTX groups (47.8%, 67.2%, and 65.8%, respectively) than in the placebo plus MTX group (14.5%) (P < 0.001). ACR50 response rates with the 20-mg, 40-mg, and 80-mg adalimumab dosages (31.9%, 55.2%, and 42.5%, respectively) were significantly greater than that with placebo (8.1%) (P = 0.003, P < 0.001, and P < 0.001, respectively). The 40-mg and 80-mg doses of adalimumab were associated with an ACR70 response (26.9% and 19.2%, respectively) that was statistically significantly greater than that with placebo (4.8%) (P < 0.001 and P = 0.020). Responses were rapid, with the greatest proportion of adalimumab-treated patients achieving an ACR20 response at the first scheduled visit (week 1). Adalimumab was safe and well tolerated; comparable numbers of adalimumab-treated patients and placebo-treated patients reported adverse events. CONCLUSION: The addition of adalimumab at a dosage of 20 mg, 40 mg, or 80 mg administered subcutaneously every other week to long-term MTX therapy in patients with active RA provided significant, rapid, and sustained improvement in disease activity over 24 weeks compared with MTX plus placebo.

Husni ME, Maier AL, Mease PJ, Overman SS, Fraser P, Gravallese EM, Weinblatt ME. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #12115220 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of etanercept in the treatment of adult patients with Still's disease. METHODS: Twelve adult patients who met criteria for Still's disease and had active arthritis were enrolled in a 6-month open-label trial of etanercept given in biweekly doses of 25 mg. The mean disease duration at study entry was 10.7 years. All patients had been treated unsuccessfully with other disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Efficacy was evaluated according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) improvement criteria, and adverse events were recorded. RESULTS: Ten patients successfully completed the study; 2 withdrew due to disease flare. In 4 patients, the dosage of etanercept was increased from 25 mg biweekly to 25 mg 3 times per week. Seven patients met ACR 20% response criteria. Of these 7 responders, 4 met ACR 50% response criteria and 2 met ACR 70% response criteria. Among the 3 patients with systemic features of Still's disease (fever and rash), improvement in these features was seen in 1; the arthritis did not improve in any of these 3 patients. Except in the 2 patients who withdrew due to disease flare (rash, fever, and arthritis), no other significant adverse events occurred. CONCLUSION: In this initial study of etanercept therapy for Still's disease in the adult, this treatment resulted in improvement in the arthritis and was well tolerated. Additional trials should be performed to elucidate the effects of tumor necrosis factor inhibitors in Still's disease.

Moreland LW, Bucy RP, Weinblatt ME, Mohler KM, Spencer-Green GT, Chatham WW. · Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama 35294-7201, USA. · Clin Immunol. · Pubmed #11987981 No free full text.

Abstract: Etanercept, a recombinant human tumor necrosis factor (TNF) inhibitor that binds both soluble and cell-bound TNF, has been shown to reduce disease activity and inhibit joint destruction when administered to patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Because TNF receptors are found on many types of cells that modulate the immune response, we evaluated the general immune function of a subset of RA patients in a blinded clinical study. No significant differences were seen between patients treated with etanercept or placebo in the surface antigen phenotypes of peripheral blood leukocytes, T cell proliferative responses, neutrophil function, delayed-type hypersensitivity (DTH) reactions, serum immunoglobulin levels, or incidence of infections. Although this observational study was relatively small and could detect only major changes in immunological status, the stability of immune function over time in patients receiving etanercept corroborates the findings in clinical studies, which suggest that etanercept does not alter overall global immune function.

Cohen S, Hurd E, Cush J, Schiff M, Weinblatt ME, Moreland LW, Kremer J, Bear MB, Rich WJ, McCabe D. · Department of Rheumatology, St. Paul Medical Center, Dallas, Texas 75235, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #11920396 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anakinra in combination with methotrexate (MTX) in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA). METHODS: Patients with moderate-to-severe active RA who were receiving MTX for 6 consecutive months, with stable doses for > or = 3 months (those with disease duration of >6 months but <12 years) were randomized into 6 groups: placebo or 0.04, 0.1, 0.4, 1.0, or 2.0 mg/kg of anakinra administered in a single, daily, subcutaneous injection. The primary efficacy end point was the proportion of subjects who met the American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement criteria (attained an ACR20 response) at week 12. RESULTS: A total of 419 patients were randomized in the study. Patient demographics and disease status were similar in the 6 treatment groups. The ACR20 responses at week 12 in the 5 active treatment plus MTX groups demonstrated a statistically significant (P = 0.001) dose-response relationship compared with the ACR20 response in the placebo plus MTX group. The ACR20 response rate in the anakinra 1.0-mg/kg (46%; P = 0.001) and 2.0-mg/kg (38%; P = 0.007) dose groups was significantly greater than that in the placebo group (19%). The ACR20 responses at 24 weeks were consistent with those at 12 weeks. Similar improvements in anakinra-treated subjects were noted in individual ACR components, erythrocyte sedimentation rate, onset of ACR20 response, sustainability of ACR20 response, and magnitude of ACR response. Anakinra was safe and well tolerated. Injection site reaction was the most frequently noted adverse event, and this led to premature study withdrawal in 7% (1.0-mg/kg group) to 10% (2.0-mg/kg group) of patients receiving higher doses. CONCLUSION: In patients with persistently active RA, the combination of anakinra and MTX was safe and well tolerated and provided significantly greater clinical benefit than MTX alone.

Mroczkowski PJ, Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM. · Division of Rheumatology, Albany Medical College, New York 12208-3479, USA. · Clin Exp Rheumatol. · Pubmed #10589360 No free full text.

Abstract: An open-label, one-year study was conducted to evaluate the safety and clinical response to leflunomide and methotrexate combination therapy for rheumatoid arthritis. Study results revealed tolerable safety, no significant pharmacokinetic interactions between methotrexate and leflunomide, and suggested improved clinical response with combination therapy.

Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Coblyn JS, Maier AL, Helfgott SM, Morrell M, Byrne VM, Kaymakcian MV, Strand V. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA. · Arthritis Rheum. · Pubmed #10403258 links to  free full text

Abstract: OBJECTIVE: To examine the safety and pharmacokinetics of and clinical response to leflunomide, a de novo pyrimidine synthesis inhibitor, when administered to patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who have been receiving long-term methotrexate therapy. METHODS: This was an open-label, 52-week study in which 30 patients with RA that remained active despite therapy with methotrexate at 17+/-4 mg/week (mean +/- SD) for > or =6 months were given leflunomide, 10-20 mg/day. Patients were assessed for adverse effects, pharmacokinetic measurements of leflunomide and methotrexate, and clinical response by American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% response criteria. RESULTS: Twenty-three patients completed 1 year of treatment. No significant pharmacokinetic interactions between leflunomide and methotrexate were noted. This combination therapy was generally well tolerated clinically, with the exception of elevations of liver enzyme levels. Seven patients withdrew from the treatment regimen: 2 withdrawals were voluntary, 3 were due to persistent elevation of plasma transaminase levels, and 2 were due to lack of efficacy. Of the patients, 16 (53%) met ACR 20% response criteria. Two met ACR criteria for remission after 1 year. CONCLUSION: The combination of methotrexate and leflunomide has therapeutic potential in RA.

Moreland LW, Schiff MH, Baumgartner SW, Tindall EA, Fleischmann RM, Bulpitt KJ, Weaver AL, Keystone EC, Furst DE, Mease PJ, Ruderman EM, Horwitz DA, Arkfeld DG, Garrison L, Burge DJ, Blosch CM, Lange ML, McDonnell ND, Weinblatt ME. · Division of Clinical Immunology and Rheumatology, University of Alabama at Birmingham, 35294-7201, USA. · Ann Intern Med. · Pubmed #10075615 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: In a phase II study, etanercept (recombinant human tumor necrosis factor receptor [p75]:Fc fusion protein) safely produced rapid, dose-dependent improvement in rheumatoid arthritis over 3 months. OBJECTIVE: To confirm the benefit of etanercept therapy of longer duration and simplified dosing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. DESIGN: Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial with blinded joint assessors. SETTING: 13 North American centers. PATIENTS: 234 patients with active rheumatoid arthritis who had an inadequate response to disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. INTERVENTION: Twice-weekly subcutaneous injections of etanercept, 10 or 25 mg, or placebo for 6 months. MEASUREMENTS: The primary end points were 20% and 50% improvement in disease activity according to American College of Rheumatology (ACR) responses at 3 and 6 months. Other end points were 70% ACR responses at 3 and 6 months and other measures of disease activity at 3 and 6 months. RESULTS: Etanercept significantly reduced disease activity in a dose-related fashion. At 3 months, 62% of the patients receiving 25 mg of etanercept and 23% of the placebo recipients achieved 20% ACR response (P < 0.001). At 6 months, 59% of the 25-mg group and 11% of the placebo group achieved a 20% ACR response (P < 0.001); 40% and 5%, respectively, achieved a 50% ACR response (P < 0.01). The respective mean percentage reduction in the number of tender and swollen joints at 6 months was 56% and 47% in the 25-mg group and 6% and -7% in the placebo group (P < 0.05). Significantly more etanercept recipients achieved a 70% ACR response, minimal disease status (0 to 5 affected joints), and improved quality of life. Etanercept was well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxic effects. CONCLUSIONS: Etanercept can safely provide rapid, significant, and sustained benefit in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis.

Weinblatt ME, Kremer JM, Bankhurst AD, Bulpitt KJ, Fleischmann RM, Fox RI, Jackson CG, Lange M, Burge DJ. · Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA 02115, USA. · N Engl J Med. · Pubmed #9920948 links to  free full text

Abstract: BACKGROUND: Patients treated with methotrexate for rheumatoid arthritis often improve but continue to have active disease. This study was undertaken to determine whether the addition of etanercept, a soluble tumor necrosis factor receptor (p75):Fc fusion protein (TNFR:Fc), to methotrexate therapy would provide additional benefit to patients who had persistent rheumatoid arthritis despite receiving methotrexate. METHODS: In a 24-week, double-blind trial, we randomly assigned 89 patients with persistently active rheumatoid arthritis despite at least 6 months of methotrexate therapy at a stable dose of 15 to 25 mg per week (or as low as 10 mg per week for patients unable to tolerate higher doses) to receive either etanercept (25 mg) or placebo subcutaneously twice weekly while continuing to receive methotrexate. The primary measure of clinical response was the American College of Rheumatology criteria for a 20 percent improvement in measures of disease activity (ACR 20) at 24 weeks. RESULTS: The addition of etanercept to methotrexate therapy resulted in rapid and sustained improvement. At 24 weeks, 71 percent of the patients receiving etanercept plus methotrexate and 27 percent of those receiving placebo plus methotrexate met the ACR 20 criteria (P<0.001); 39 percent of the patients receiving etanercept plus methotrexate and 3 percent of those receiving placebo plus methotrexate met the ACR 50 criteria (for a 50 percent improvement) (P<0.001). Patients receiving etanercept plus methotrexate had significantly better outcomes according to all measures of disease activity. The only adverse events associated with etanercept were mild injection-site reactions, and no patient withdrew from the study because of adverse events associated with etanercept. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with persistently active rheumatoid arthritis, the combination of etanercept and methotrexate was safe and well tolerated and provided significantly greater clinical benefit than methotrexate alone.